Guy Wants Freedom To Explore Outside Of Marriage, Wife Uncovers His Gym Affair And Walks Away
For some, after twenty years together, a marriage can feel like both a comfort and a cage. When one partner begins to question whether they’ve missed out on life’s experiences, it brings things like tension, uncertainty, and even fear of betrayal to the surface.
This was exactly the position today’s Original Poster (OP) found herself in when her husband suggested opening their marriage, claiming it was a way to explore life while still keeping their bond intact. However, she wasn’t on board with it and would later discover why.
More info: Reddit
Suggesting an open marriage after decades together isn’t just a casual idea, it’s an idea that raises questions about love, loyalty, and personal fulfillment
Image credits: freepik / Freepik (not the actual photo)
After 20 years of marriage, the author’s husband suggested opening their relationship, saying they were “missing out” on life experiences
Image credits: freepik / Freepik (not the actual photo)
She agreed to the idea to see the truth, suspecting he might already have someone else in mind
Image credits: jet-po / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Her suspicions were confirmed when she discovered he had been flirting with a woman from his gym, revealing emotional infidelity
Image credits: AdLeast2511
She moved out, prepared divorce papers, and ended the marriage to protect her well-being, despite his protests that he “would have chosen” her
After 20 years together, the OP’s husband raised the idea of opening their marriage. He claimed that he loved her, but felt like that were missing out on other experiences especially since they had settled down too young. She understood the curiosity, but for her, non-monogamy was never an option. In fact, she believed that if he wanted to “live more”, the honest solution was to end the marriage.
The OP also suspected that it wasn’t a random suggestion, rather it developed gradually, and so, she began to suspect he either had someone in mind, or was already emotionally involved. Instead of arguing, she agreed to the arrangement, and it didn’t take long before she discovered there was indeed another woman. It was someone from his gym, and they had been flirting with for a while.
For her, that was the breaking point, and she was convinced that his suggestion was premeditated. When her husband traveled to visit family, she then sent a message to him, prepared divorce papers, and moved out quietly. Her husband accused her of tricking him, saying he would have chosen her if she had refused, but she believed he had already stepped outside the marriage emotionally.
At 40, she wasn’t pretending this was an easy decision. She clarified that he was the love of her life and admitted she didn’t want to start over, but she also knew that saying “no” to the arrangement in the first place might have left her trapped in endless suspicion.
Image credits: prostock-studio / Freepik (not the actual photo)
When the OP’s husband said they had been together since 20 and might be “missing out”, his reasoning echoed a pattern relationship experts often describe. Hello Prenup explains that some couples explore open marriages to address unmet emotional or physical needs while preserving the core relationship.
Curiosity, desire for variety, or personal growth, especially after settling down young, can all fuel the conversation. However, Sagebrush Counseling notes that it’s not uncommon for a partner proposing an open marriage to already be emotionally or physically involved elsewhere. Sometimes, the suggestion is framed as mutual exploration while quietly serving to legitimize an existing attachment or ease guilt.
Adding to that, Brainz Magazine reports that emotional affairs frequently precede physical ones because they build intimacy in private, gradually weakening boundaries. Emotional closeness can become intoxicating, creating excitement and validation that rival, or even surpass, physical attraction.
Netizens were on the OP’s side, arguing that her husband’s request wasn’t theoretical but strategic. They also rejected his claim that he would have “chosen” her, pointing out that he had already made that choice 20 years ago. What do you think about this situation? Do you think saying “yes” to see the truth is justified, or would you have said no? We would love to know your thoughts!
Netizens expressed sympathy for the author, suggested the open marriage proposal was less about growth and more about permission
I would have told him, "The thing is, the minute you suggested this, all the love and attraction I ever had for you disappeared in an instant, so there was never going to be any other outcome here than divorce, that was inevitable. You want to date other people, now your free to do so. But in the process you've lost my love forever".
I’m afraid I snort laughed at him being upset she fooled him, didn’t want a divorce, and would have chosen her if she’d said no. “Honey, that’s predicated on a false idea that after your request to open our marriage I would still want you. From the moment you spoke, I knew you were cheating; all I did was give you enough rope to hang yourself.”
I would have told him, "The thing is, the minute you suggested this, all the love and attraction I ever had for you disappeared in an instant, so there was never going to be any other outcome here than divorce, that was inevitable. You want to date other people, now your free to do so. But in the process you've lost my love forever".
I’m afraid I snort laughed at him being upset she fooled him, didn’t want a divorce, and would have chosen her if she’d said no. “Honey, that’s predicated on a false idea that after your request to open our marriage I would still want you. From the moment you spoke, I knew you were cheating; all I did was give you enough rope to hang yourself.”





















25
4