Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
50 Hilarious Science Memes That Prove That Science Can Be Funny, As Shared On This Instagram Page
While science may not be for everyone, science memes are a whole different thing.
By combining educational material and painfully relatable situations that bring back the memories of everything from physics class to your chemistry teacher, from lab work to a math test, it serves as one kind of hilarious entertainment.
And this Instagram page titled “Memes Of Science” features some of the “funniest science-related memes in one place,” according to their description. With 42.6K followers and counting, the page clearly has a lot to offer, so put on your safety glasses, everyone, we are about to dive deep into the rabbit hole.
This post may include affiliate links.
RELATED:
#3
While not everyone has a gift for science (shout out to all my fellow humanities people!), the recent body of research showed that there are other factors that might be to blame for our limited brain capacity and decreased cognitive functions.
One such factor is quite surprising – it turns out that something as basic as an unhealthy diet which is high in fat and sugar can cause detrimental changes to the brain and lead to cognitive impairment. Recently, scientists ran two large-scale studies that revealed that eating ultra-processed foods may exacerbate age-related cognitive decline and increase the risk of developing dementia.
#4
#5
troufaki13 2 years ago
I recently saw a video of someone asking random people in the street general knowledge questions. They all got them wrong, except the question "name the 3 Kardashian sisters, bonus points for the brother". Just sadness...
According to Sara N. Burke, an Associate Professor of Neuroscience and Associate Director of the Cognitive Aging and Memory Center (CAM), ultra-processed foods tend to be lower in nutrients and fiber and higher in sugar, fat, and salt compared to unprocessed or minimally processed foods.
“Some examples of ultra-processed foods include soda, packaged cookies, chips, frozen meals, flavored nuts, flavored yogurt, distilled alcoholic beverages, and fast foods. Even packaged breads, including those high in nutritious whole grains, qualify as ultra-processed in many cases because of the additives and preservatives they contain,” she explained in this article.
#8
Old Roadie 2 years ago
Wrote Wiki article on my family's business.. which dates back almost a century. We developed, customized much of the equipment. Article was "corrected" by some numbskull that had never operated the equipment. I changed it back. He changed it again. I finally got sick of the bully and just deleted the page. He then made one on *my business with wrong information.
Load More Replies...
Doctor Strange 2 years ago
Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source. My friend had a professor who assigned a project, a report on the "North American Tree Mollusk". If you went to Wikipedia, you would find a full entry. It had pictures, even links to sources. It was all BS. If you actually tried to do any research you'd find that such a thing didn't exist. Heck, if you even read the wikipedia article you'd realize it. It listed one of its primary predators as Bigfoot. But if you just opened wikipedia, skimmed or copied it, then turned in a report, you failed.
RedMarbles 2 years ago
It is simply a fantastic starting point. Guessing that the less niche a subject is, the higher the likelihood the relevant community will be on top of correcting misinformation. Overall still an incredibly useful tool, even if it includes misinformation and disinformation and can't be relied upon to be the final word.
Load More Replies...
Ray Ceeya (RayCeeYa) 2 years ago
Wikipedia has really tightened things up over the last decade or so. Make some random change and then see how long it takes for it to be corrected. It's usually corrected within 10 minutes.
VonBlade 2 years ago (edited)
"Sir, why isn't Wikipedia a reliable source when it's curated and peer-reviewed by many knowledgable people and easily corrected, but this text book written by one guy alone 100 years ago and largely guessing somehow is just because it's been printed?"
Bobby 2 years ago
Wikipedia has about a many errors per word as any encyclopedia. However it is far more liberal in political bias than most encyclopedias. I think that's half the reason everyone fights it as a source
Load More Replies...
Domi 2 years ago
My student self laughs a lot. But he remembers the words the professors used to say: Wikipedia is not a reliable source.
Ray Ceeya (RayCeeYa) 2 years ago
But it provides links to reliable sources. Check the footnotes and cite those articles after you confirm that that's what they actually say. That's how you science student folks.
Load More Replies...
lazy red panda 2 years ago
life hack: use sweet search.com, it is really helpful and gives you reliable websites with answers
David Paterson 2 years ago
This explains a heck of a lot of what has happened to Wikipedia. The most important parts have a tendency to vanish.
In a December 2022 study, researchers discovered that those participants of the study who ate a diet containing more ultra-processed foods at the start of the study showed more cognitive decline compared with those that ate little to no ultra-processed foods.
Professor Burke argues that for adults over the age of 55, a healthier diet could increase the likelihood of maintaining better brain function. “In particular, the Mediterranean diet and ketogenic diet are associated with better cognition in advanced age.”
These two diets, Burke argues, are capable of reversing some of these changes and improving cognitive function. Scientists suspect that this is possible because these diets reduce harmful inflammation.
#10
David Paterson 2 years ago
"small stuff, big stuff, hot stuff, cold stuff, fast stuff, heavy stuff, dark stuff, turbulence, and the concept of time" - damn, that's 100% correct.
When it comes to the current state of the world’s science field, it’s interesting to note that the number of science and technology research papers published has skyrocketed over the past few decades.
Despite that, the new data from millions of manuscripts show something interesting. Nature reports that compared with mid-twentieth-century research, that done in the 2000s was much more likely to push science forward incrementally than to veer off in a new direction and render previous work obsolete. Analysis of patents from 1976 to 2010 showed the same trend.
#16
Paulo Freitas 2 years ago
Lol, " its funny because its true " ( just imagine Sheldon saing it )
“The data suggest something is changing,” says Russell Funk, a sociologist at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and a co-author of the analysis. “You don’t have quite the same intensity of breakthrough discoveries you once had.”
What’s more, the authors also analyzed the most common verbs used in manuscripts. Their study published in Nature found that whereas research in the 1950s was more likely to use words evoking creation or discovery such as ‘produce’ or ‘determine’, that done in the 2010s was more likely to refer to incremental progress, using terms such as ‘improve’ or ‘enhance’.
#20
#26
Ali H M Salehuddin 2 years ago
Cats won't feel the spiciness. Their tounges have no receptor for capcisin (the stuff that makes food hot). That being said, do not feed them with spicy foods. Their digestive systems are not built for it
#29
ADHORTATOR 2 years ago
I am so bad at math that even my math teachers didn' t understand how this was possible
#33
#36
#42
A Really Bored Panda 2 years ago
I know this is a joke but it is possible. Multiplying is the same as dividing by the inverse (and vice versa). E.g. 5*2 = 5/0.5. Or 6/2 = 6*1/2
#44
Serial pacifist 2 years ago (edited)
The first with Hairy Styles is my favorite, although the second still attracts more.
#45
#47
Anyone-for-tea? 2 years ago
Poor dog, looks a bit worried, why would you put them up there like that?
#52
David Paterson 2 years ago
It took Russell and Whitehead 300 pages to prove that 1+1=2. Which doesn't make sense.
#56
Add New Image
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Jessica Bertram 2 years ago (edited)
of course they're catholic, kittykitty. catholic just means universal in its original sense. And boy oh boy, are those protons and neutrons EVERYWHERE
Load More Replies...
Nonna_SoF 2 years ago (edited)
Little Johnny was a chemist's son, but Johnny is no more, what he thought was H2O was H2SO4.
Jeff Diamond 2 years ago
Two guys walk into a bar. One said "I'll just have some H2O." The second says "I'll have some H2O too." The second man dies.
Load More Replies... 
Arthur Waite 2 years ago
I think BP should find a way to punish readers who jump in and comment on an item, without first reading the previous comments, so as to not repeat the same smart answer over. So they don't post the same answer over. And over.
PeridotPlatypus377 2 years ago
It’s not that bad. It’s only an extra fifteen seconds of reading at the most. Sometimes it’s even helpful to have several different perspectives describing the same topic. Not every explanation will be effective for everyone nor may only one single explanation be. A little variety can be a good thing.
Load More Replies...
Diego,Laura 2 years ago
When science can be funny, stupid, and educational all at the same time.
Jessica Bertram 2 years ago (edited)
of course they're catholic, kittykitty. catholic just means universal in its original sense. And boy oh boy, are those protons and neutrons EVERYWHERE
Load More Replies... Nonna_SoF 2 years ago (edited)
Little Johnny was a chemist's son, but Johnny is no more, what he thought was H2O was H2SO4.
Jeff Diamond 2 years ago
Two guys walk into a bar. One said "I'll just have some H2O." The second says "I'll have some H2O too." The second man dies.
Load More Replies... Arthur Waite 2 years ago
I think BP should find a way to punish readers who jump in and comment on an item, without first reading the previous comments, so as to not repeat the same smart answer over. So they don't post the same answer over. And over.
PeridotPlatypus377 2 years ago
It’s not that bad. It’s only an extra fifteen seconds of reading at the most. Sometimes it’s even helpful to have several different perspectives describing the same topic. Not every explanation will be effective for everyone nor may only one single explanation be. A little variety can be a good thing.
Load More Replies... Diego,Laura 2 years ago
When science can be funny, stupid, and educational all at the same time.
You May Like 50 Hilarious Posts From This Account Dedicated To Sharing “Men’s Humor” (New Pics) 50 of the Best Memes of All Time That Are Icons of Internet Culture If You Need A Laugh Today, ‘Laughgorithm’ Has Found You The Perfect 70 Memes
Greta Jaruševičiūtė
Ilona Baliūnaitė
Ilona Baliūnaitė
Related on Bored Panda
