50 Random Memes That Are Too Hilarious To Keep To Yourself

No, even during the bear's production of Ibsen's "The Doll's House", none of them quoted shakespeare. Which would have been in appropriate anyway.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

As one of Jehovah's Winesses, I ask that you please listen politely, and then kindly indicate if you are interested in what is being said. Even if you don't want to have anything to do with us, people often find encouragement and comfort in what we have to share. Also, keep in mind we are all different, and some us have a harder time hearing "I'm not interested" than others do

I did not find encouragement or comfort in what the JWs had to say to me. I had just had my third miscarriage (at the end of my fifth month of pregnancy), with two previous miscarriages and sixteen years of infertility. I was in deep, deep grief and hopelessness, so when they knocked on my door, I let them in. I was desperate for the tiniest bit of hope or comfort. I was told that the loss of my babies was because I was a sinner. So no ..no comfort, no encouragement. I would be incredibly happy if every stripe of Christian avoided my path until the end of my days. And P.S.: when someone says they aren't interested, that means get the f*ck off my porch and don't come back.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Hate to break it to you, but there is. Blanket statements like that tend to be wrong at least in part. I'm guessing you've not read it if you say that. You don't have to believe it's inspired by a god to accept that somewhere in history some people got the science right. Cleanliness and quarantine, long before European scientists and germ theory. "The Earth is hanging on nothing" long before the elephants and turtles theory was dismissed. "The circle of the earth" long before Eratosthenes. Even a single man/woman as ancestors. Mitochondrial Eve is real. Even a flood with a boat and a small number of survivors is such a universal folk legend, leading many to conclude there must have been some event early in humanity's history that has been verbally passed down. You simply can't say there is "No science".

I'm afraid you don't understand what science is. I was raised Catholic. I have read the Bible. There is nothing scientific about it. Quite the opposite in fact.

In Genesis clearly states that first was the light (without source for it), then the plants (without sun for photosynthesis) and after the sun, which is necessary for the previous ones. So, there is plain B.S. in your holy book, written by half-literate goatfockers, instead of science.

There is so much B.S. bias in your comment, I can't even process it all. Do you really believe there was no science until, what? Isaac Newton? Just because it's attributed to God does not make it less scientific. Nothing says that God and science are mutually exclusive except small-minded zealots like you.