50 Times People Exposed Their Poor Economic Knowledge And This Community Took The Chance To Mock Them
People disagree about politics. What would they argue about on the Internet if not the political and economic state of the world? That sometimes seeps into meatspace, too. In the U.S., for example, 45% of Americans say they talk about politics with most of their social networks.
A big debate people have around politics is often how much government should be involved in people's lives. Statists would say that a lot, while anti-statists believe that no government – left, right, or centrist – should be in charge.
The subreddit "[Stuff] Statists Say" is dedicated to roasting governmantalists for their political takes. And here we present to you the top posts these internet anarchists have shared over the years.
More info: Reddit
This post may include affiliate links.
FBI Break Into Man's Home Over Lawful Purchases And Statists Cheer
Anon:
Just have government break into everyone's house and steal s**t, totally cool.
SusanRosenberg:
This is the exact thing that makes me worried about my farm being registered with the USDA.
As someone who works in food processing, the USDA is there to HELP YOU! Do you know what happens if you are selling food that is not USDA inspected? You can't buy insurance. Fail your USDA inspections? No insurance. When somebody gets sick, you LOSE YOUR FARM in a lawsuit. The USDA is there to protect consumers but they are also there to protect industry. Read the guidelines and listen to your inspector and your business will not be destroyed when someone eventually gets sick. Also people who drink raw milk can literally eff off and die.
I See The Leftists Are Still Confusing Net Worth With Cash
guitargodgt:
Posts like that are the explanation for why 20% of the US population has nothing in retirement and no savings account and 58% have less than $1k saved.
Daily_the_Project21:
Doesn't that just create an incentive to not make more than $999 million? Wouldn't Bezos just sell all his shares, cause the stock to go crashing causing a ripple effect of panic selling, f**k the whole market and economy, and then retire somewhere where none of this matters to him? That's what I'd do.
And what would Daily_the_Project21 gain from all this? "If I were a billionaire I'd be an utter sociopath" isn't the clever argument he thinks it is...
We Gave You Chance, Now It's $50!
triflingo:
Are people really that f**king dumb?
tosseriffic:
Ironically, life is more tolerable when you keep it in the front of your mind at all times that most people are complete f**king morons. Legitimately half of the people you meet have sub 100 IQ, and one in six has an IQ below 85.
And we can both guess where "trifilingo" and "tosseriffic" are located in that IQ statistic...
The world was probably never this divided over politics in recent decades. And nowhere is that divide as stark as in the United States. As a 2024 Gallup poll shows, the percentage of moderate voters in America has reached historical lows. Only 34% of Americans describe themselves as moderates, while 37% say they're Republicans and only 25% identify as liberals.
Although those who say they are liberal or very liberal are in the minority, it's still the highest percentage in a long time. In 1992, only 17% of Americans said they were liberals. The percentage of Americans identifying as conservatives has been steady since 1992, when it was 36%.
Still, both conservatives' and liberals' ideologies are at their most extreme in 30 years. 24% of Republicans claim they are 'very conservative,' and 18% of Democrats say they are 'very liberal.'
Mods Aren't Part Of The 14%
byzantinian:
Thread
Survey Results
Survey Data
Anon:
Holy s**t they're actually insane.
"14.2% of people believe free speech should all be protected. Why is that?"
"My guess is that a lot of people haven't really put that much thought into it beyond that it allows f*scists a platform."
What.
Rich People Can "Own" People By Paying Them A Lot Of Money
Darth_Parth:
Bruh if you offer someone $1M to clean your house, you're the one getting owned.
Ed_Radley:
It's all relative. If their time is valuable enough to them that they can't even be bothered to pick up after themselves because of the lost value, buy all means pay somebody that $1 million and let the value generation commence.
Clean someone's house for the rest of my life? Hard NO! I'd do it for a year or two though. That's good money.
Government Enforced Monopoly? Must Be Capitalism
Saivlin:
IP laws aren't a free market. They are, by definition, a government granted monopoly. While there is ample debate about whether and to what extent IP law and/or its individual components (eg, patent, copyright, trade mark, trade secret) helps or hinders the economy as a whole, it's still a government granted monopoly.
nosmokingbandit:
Any jerk can file a suit against any other jerk for literally any reason. The ability to sue means nothing. We should save our outrage until the ruling.
First, the lawsuit has since been withdrawn because the Pepsi patent on the specific type of potato, named FC5, has since been revoked on a technicality. Second, Pepsi had its reasons: they had a deal with farmers growing their patented potato variety, -that Pepsi developed to favor low water content making it perfect for frying, and had patents granted- where Pepsi would provide seeds to the farmers, and they would be the only purchaser. At some point, some farmer started selling those seeds, and four other farmers were found growing the patented variety. Third: Pepsi took action mostly because that potato is unsuitable for any other use than crisp-making, so those illegal suppliers were at risk of providing the competition with something that was an unique business advantage. Pepsi was well in their rights to sue, the whole thing was dealt with with a bit too much nationalism and little care for the actual law.
This extreme divide bleeds out into people's relationships. Some even go as far as to cut contact with relatives or friends who are on the different side of the political ideology spectrum. A 2020 Pew survey showed that Americans had very few friends who supported another presidential candidate.
Republicans and Democrats are really at each other's throats by making assumptions as well. A 2020 study showed that 8 in 10 Republicans believe that the Democratic Party has been taken over by socialists. In turn, 8 in 10 Democrats believe that the Republican Party has been seized by racists.
He Should Be Forced To Give Away More!
Anon:
If I was a billionaire, I wouldn't donate s**t to anybody. I would still be hated the exact same but have an extra $100 million in wealth.
Anon (OP):
If I were a billionaire I would donate because I want to. It's not morally Okay to force someone to distribute their wealth on the other hand. There is a difference between donation and forced distribution and that difference is consent.
This is so absurd... the whole article, but this... people defending obcene wealth concentration while people above 70 are forced to work to pay for health-care... They really think Bezos is the victim of the system and needs defenders here? Are we seriously talking about "concent" in this context? I'm out...
Come Again?
asbandit65:
“Civil liberties lobby” that’s a ridiculous way of saying people who value individual liberties.
Clare Foges is an UK conservative pundit writing for rags such as the Daily Mail, who participated in UK national politics by siding with Boris Johnson and David Cameron. Her previous qualifications were "part time ice cream truck operator" and "being fairly hot". She is the co-author of the controversial "Bloomberg Speech", the very first seed of the Brexit, we all know how it turned out.
Homeowners Hold Housing Hostage, Keeping It Away From People Who Can Live In The House
ImmySnommis:
Construction workers do not "provide" housing.
Miners and loggers provide housing. Construction workers, in fact, do the opposite of providing housing. They take the material created to build housing, hold them hostage for payment of labor, and refuse to work without pay.
Just about as dumb.
MichaelFowlie:
That’s like saying supermarkets don’t “provide” food.
But experts say that people are most often wrong and tend to see the members of the opposite party as more extreme than they actually are. "We're flattening people out in terms of our view of them," Tania Israel, author of Beyond Your Bubble: How to Connect Across the Political Divide, Skills and Strategies for Conversations That Work, told NPR. "And we're not really seeing the full complexity of people on the other side."
"YoU mIsSpElLeD CaPiTaLiSm!"
C0uN7rY:
Ah, the old "Managers and CEO's sit around and get paid while the little guys do all the work!" trope.
That's an interesting organizational conundrum. There are a bunch of studies about organization structure, and IIRC the gist is that the CEOs in large companies can have significant strategic impact, immense power to potentially harm company value but only a very moderate impact on production value; on the contrary, most organizations rely on "stars", i.e. high-performing technical staff, good managers or salesmen, usually located at the middle of the ladder, who are the largest providers of actual value in the company. So yeah, the "trope" is scientifically accurate.
It's Not Like The Advent Of Streaming Services Had Anything To Do With It
PleaseDoNotClickThis:
I didn't get shot when I stopped funding Blockbuster.
Erthwerm:
Quick somebody ask her if she still has a DVD/Blu-Ray player or if she just streams/downloads stuff.
Can anyone cite a single example of a person being shot for defunding a Library? That dude is FoS.
“Anticapitalist Etsy Shop”
shook_not_shaken:
This is what happens when leftoids change the definition of capitalism from "the free market" to "when exclusively non-workers own the means of production". Just let them have their fantasy, you can't have a discussion with people who change the definitions of words.
ICantBelieveItsNotEC:
Everyone is against capitalism until they suddenly realise that they can be a capitalist too.
These comments are written by two people who have no idea what "Capitalist" or "Capitalism" means. You can pay someone to make stickers with your design on them. They aren't making the stickers themselves. The printer who prints the stickers is the capitalist but I see what the dumb@$$es were trying to say.
But 'tis the nature of socialization online. And nowadays, most of us do get our news and express our political opinions on social media. Most of us know that political discussions online are usually pointless and only cause our blood pressure to rise. But that toxic environment doesn't come out of nowhere; it's created by people. And some researchers suggest that netizens who choose to participate in political discussions online might already be uncivil.
I Would Like To File A Complaint
Messengerw1:
A country that enforced a mandatory gun buy back program now passing more authoritarian policies?
Shocker.
Because We All Know Taxes Actually Go Towards War And Not "Social Programs"
burneralt012:
They go towards "social programs" too, but most of the money is spent on bureaucracy and corruption, and government always pays far too much money compared to companies, so very little actually money actually ends up in the pockets of the poor as a result. We've spent 15 trillion on the war on poverty so far, and the rate is still the same.
opaqueperson:
As a disclaimer, let's not jump on the bandwagon to say Amazon (or the "rich") doesn't pay taxes. Amazon does pay the legally required taxes, or the IRS would be hounding them. They just make little to no profits so they pay limited income taxes, due to losses, costs, and other totally normal, totally legal situations. And of course #TaxationIsTheft
Is that not what America already pays for? Imagine if billionaires and millionaires paid their taxes properly, and the government actually uses the taxes for communities, like homeless aid programs, giving Americans low cost or free healthcare, well-funded public schools that don't make parents pay for their kid's supplies and the teacher's, improving infrastructure and giving more communities public transportation, etc.
Are You Kidding Me?
AYE-BO:
What's hilarious is that capitalists are literally eating the rich at the moment. Much more so than any dumb a*s wannabe commie or hippy ever has or will. It may not be long term. It wont effect them much in the end. But the little people are definitely showing the rich people that we can use their own dirty tricks against them.
Whiprust:
LibCaps are often just as class conscious as Socialists of any type. We all eat the rich, but what State Socialists usually don't realize is that the government is what's feeding the rich in the first place. If anything the whole r/WSB debacle is proving that you can't eat the rich until you eat the government.
Researchers Michalis Mamakos and Eli Finkel studied politically engaged users' behavior on Reddit. They found that those who facilitate a toxic environment on non-partisan subreddits do the same thing on political ones.
"Our findings suggest that online political discourse is uncivil largely because the people who opt into it are generally uncivil," Mamakos said. "Such individuals undermine the democratic values that should be present in the public sphere."
Oh, Americans Hate The Bill Of Rights Now? The USA Is Screwed. From The Grovel Institute
TheAmbiguousAnswer:
The constitution includes voting rights, banning slavery, and the Bill of Rights; more specifically, it includes amendments that guarantee you can speak out on tyranny (1st Amendment), resist them invading your life (4th Amendment), and guarantees you can back those rights (and others) up with force (the 2nd Amendment, our favorite amendment).
I can understand wanting to amend the constitution, but when someone wants to throw nearly 30 of those amendments that have accumulated over 300 years, and start a new one... really f**king sus.
VoidAgent:
I think some people simply do not fully grasp how integral to the existence of the United States the Constitution is. To them, it’s more like...a really famous Congressional bill or maybe a Supreme Court ruling. Important, but we could probably do without it. In actuality, it is the document that outlines that which the US is built upon. Without the Constitution, the United States is simply not the United States anymore.
But the US Constitution *ACTUALLY SUCKS*. It's badly outdated, badly written in the first place, and -as painfully evident- lacks provisions to curb grab of power. The electoral college concept has been surpassed in modern democracies since the late 1800s. The lack of proportional voting and the "winner takes all" mindset nowadays is ridiculous. The "2 senator per state" was a stupid compromise stemming from a 18th Century political dealing, and still gives excessive representation to states with more cows than people. The language is outdated and vague (see the "well organized militia" thing that the gun nerds love so much but originated with the exact opposite meaning of what they understand). The provisions for amendments makes it basically impossible to bring the constitution to a modern standard.
What If I Don't Declare My Job ?
goose-and-fish:
Every time you buy something the government takes a slice. Own property, government takes a slice. Die, government takes a slice.
It’s not like employment is the only tax government collects.
molotok_c_518:
Use a service? Taxed.
Use a utility? Taxed.
If the government could find a way to tax air, you know they'd be all over that.
For a fun read here's an article about what happened when enough moronic civil libertarians moved to the tiny town of Grafton, New Hampshire and were able to take over and (mostly) eliminate the town government: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21534416/free-state-project-new-hampshire-libertarians-matthew-hongoltz-hetling FWIW, my position is that anyone who claims to be a libertarian should be force to live for a year on a road that's owned by a capitalist.
North Korea And China Are Champions Of Human Rights
Ibeagoodman (OP):
Update:
It looks like UN Watch is an organization devoted to critiquing the UN, and this tweet was sarcasm.
https://unwatch.org/
It may have been sarcasm, but the kettle is still black even when it's the pot that points it out.
The "[Stuff] Statists Say" subreddit is the place for netizens with slightly anarchistic views. Yet we have to be exact here: anarchism and anti-statism are two different things. Anarchists are usually against establishments of any kind, believing that all governments are (or are destined to become) evil. Anti-statists tend to be more moderate, believing in the minimization of state and its power.
What The F**k Is Wrong With These People
It’s Almost Like This Isn’t A Case Of The State Forcing The Economy To Shut Down And Then Claiming Credit For It Getting Better Once They Allow It To Open Again... Are People Seriously Dumb Enough To Buy This Propaganda?
Some Boot-Licking In My Fortune Cookie
the9trances:
I think it's pretty insightful, actually.
People who claim to love "democracy" only truly love it when their personal flavor wins and forces its view on the rest. This seems like a satirical take on that.
deefop:
Quite true.
I'm listening to a Tom Woods episode today with Peter Schiff where he's talking about living down in Puerto Rico, and they have tons of elite progressives from California moving down there to escape the horrific taxes, all while vociferously rooting for politicians that will increase the very taxes they're trying to escape.
It's f**king mind boggling and hypocritical to a fare thee well.
Some people suggest that Americans might be the biggest anti-statists of all. Author and journalist John Judis points to the debate over national health insurance in the U.S. He says that people want support from the government, yet they still don't like or trust it.
In 2025, 57% of Americans think that healthcare is the government's responsibility. But when it comes to insurance, the majority (53%) still say they'd prefer a healthcare system based on private insurance vs 43% who want the government to run it.
The People Who Work On Supermarket Checkouts Are Capitalist Oppressors
SRIrwinkil:
These are the same folks who don't consider any trades person who makes money a true part of the working class, the reason clearly being that well paid working folk absolutely disproves some of their root theories.
Trash goblins think that plumbers aren't working class simply because they made good money.
IIRC Marx in "Das Kapital" splits the working class in two categories, "productive" and "unproductive" (i.e. support workforce, that do not produce directly surplus value but whose labor is necessary to sustain the productive parts of society). A cashier would be in the latter category, but still be "working class" since he would not own the means of production and rely on selling labor to sustain himself.
Unintended Consequences
Anon:
I love it when they f**k themselves and wonder where the d**k came from.
They didn't "f**k" themselves. Those jobs still exist in some form or the other. Fighting to have the due rights and protection means maybe temporarily less employees as a kneejerk reaction, but over time the jobs will return and to a higher standard. It also means curbing quickly a race to the bottom that would definitely impact also the jobs where such protections already exist.
Statist Wants Climate Lockdowns To Halt Climate Change
Abandon_All-Hope:
Wow. It’s like the authoritarians found this new way to suppress people and now they want to use it to get more of what they want.
This was always a danger of complying with COVID lockdowns. If people get used to them, they will become a new tactic.
So....as long as other people are being forced to comply with YOUR beliefs, not science based facts, but your "well i really FEEL"....that's all well and good, but once there's an expectation of YOU...."well that's authoritarian"
Essentially, Judis proposes that Americans have a general ideological predisposition against giving the government too much power. "Americans have supported, or have come to support, specific governmental remedies, such as Social Security, the minimum wage, and environmental and consumer protections," he writes.
"But, when a new program that expands government is proposed, they have displayed a general ideological predisposition against the power of government."
How About We Replace "The Economy" With "Everyone's Jobs"
TheDragonReborn726:
Yes, The entire country’s economy boils down to rich people buying yachts. And if they didn’t buy yachts that money would be distributed by the government efficiently and effectively!
How does this even remotely make sense?
I see this in a lot of arguments with people of this type. I can't even call it a strawman argument, because he's actually responding to something someone actually posted, but he's treating it as a literal assessment when that's clearly not the case. It's never been the case. The only one who have ever thought it was the case was people like TheDragonReborn726. Again, the point is for TheDragonReborn726 to have an edgy reply without actually considering whether or not he's arguing against a point that's actually being made.
They Have The Word “Tiananmen” Banned From From Title In This Sub Reddit Lmaoo
r/sino is a Chinese nationalist extremism-driven community; the mods are actual PRC officers. It was wild during Covid, they were actively denying the existence of the virus while at the same time blaming anyone for it, from the USA to Spain and Italy (where the first western cases were reported, several months after the first chinese cases hidden by the government). Writing "taiwan", "tienanmen" or "winnie the pooh" would get you immediately banned.
Capitalism Forced Businesses To Shut Down. Abolish Capitalism And Everything Will Be Fine
What's your take on statism, Pandas? Do you think government bureaucracy and public institutions such as libraries are a waste of time and money? Or are they a necessary evil? Let's have some civil discussions in the comments, shall we? And, if you don't feel up to it, cheer yourself up with some anti-capitalist memes right here!
"If You Taxed Inheritance At 100% You Get A Lot Closer To Equality Of Opportunity"
WhatMixedFeelings:
Why save for your family if the government’s gonna steal all your possessions when you die? This is a great way to eliminate motivation.
Much like capping net worth, taxing inheritance at 100% (after some reasonable minimum) would result in some combination of a windfall for the government (which could reduce other taxes) and people spending more of their money instead of hoarding it until they die. We need savings to create loan money, but spending money is what drives the economy. The challenge is finding the optimal compromise, but it's definitely not letting 1% of the population own 30% of all US wealth.
Yes, If A Car Factory Is Near Me, I Can Pop In For A Day And Churn Out A Vehicle For Myself Under Socialism
skp_005:
I don't see what you guys don't get, it is all written in the response, let me point it out:
"if ... they have the resources for you to do so then go ahead"
So, you can't make a vehicle because they will never have the resources.
Glad I could help.
Smh
SnooBananas6052:
I'd much rather it be the exact opposite: 330 million gun owners, except the federal government.
Right. Because when people shoot government employees or officials they always shoot the ones who are the problem. Luigi and John Hinckley are the only people I can think of off the top of my head who made a good choice about who to shoot.
Huh?
Chinese Embassy To The United States Openly Admitting To Ethnic Genocide And Forced Sterilization Of Uighurs
Arzie5676:
CCP propaganda (a communist dictatorship): still allowed on social media.
Trump: that’s a bridge too far for the sensibilities of social media.
So Basically The State Should Prevent All Deaths
HarryBergeron927:
The government is incompetent and k*lls people! And to remedy this, we must grant more power to the incompetent k*lling machine!
This actually makes sense to auth left.
Because The People Should Never Be Allowed To Decide What’s In Their Best Interest!
lol yeah california and NYC are THRIVING. Ya know if you ignore all the homelessness and crime, the businesses and individuals abandoning them because that, and many more well intentioned thought ultimately ill conceived plans. Which they do! Shoplifting isn't a crime anymore! Arrested on a murder charge? You'll be home by dinner! Hell, there's a video going around of a someone, who just so happens to be black and trans in colorado trying to abduct a child from a school playground. Rap sheet as thick as a phonebook, a known p**o....but whoopsie....they've been designated as "mentally ill" and thus can't be prosecuted. This is the 5th time that individual has been released, for the same thing because of the dumbassery. https://nypost.com/2025/08/11/us-news/trans-s*x-offender-escapes-prosecution-after-trying-to-kidnap-child-during-elementary-school-recess/
What Does She Think The Second Amendment Is For? Hunting?
Savant_Guarde:
I stop paying attention when people start out with the debate tactic "call to authority".
I am vet and gun owner but...
Means nothing to the argument. It's kinda like when Mark Kelly says the same s**t, right before he drops to his knees for Bloomberg.
Disregarding an argument with a a term they learned in a high school debate class. Yeah, that sounds about right. I need to start selling bingo cards for anti-state arguments.
TheRightCan’tMeme Mod Stopping The Spread Of Misinformation
I Can’t Even Think Of A Witty Remark, This Is Just So Incredibly Dumb
Ok-Refrigerator9272:
Right because communism is viewed as evil because of "a" famine. Right, among other things
“Back Doors Are A Myth, We Just Want To Work With Companies To Access Encrypted Messages.”
I Told Her She Didn't Have A "Right" To Rule Others And Got A Response. Have A Feeling I Won't Be Hearing Back From Her Again!
You have rights in so far as you able to defend them. Which you are not doing....the government defends those rights....which is to say they have instilled those rights. The fact that you exist, does not entitle you to anything.
Wake Up Everyone, It Shouldnt Be Possible For People To Fail
I actually have to agree on this one. OP is still an edgelord and is skirting the point Jonny is trying (poorly) to make, but the concept of freedom implies the possibility of failure. That's not an excuse not to implement redundancies and safety nets, though, which is typically not something anti-state posters support. If the system isn't involved, it can't be the system's fault for someone failing. It IS however, the system's fault for casually turning a blind eye to problems that exist, which is frequently what anti-state solutions implement.
Capitalism Is When Public Housing
Saw This On Twitter And Couldn't Resist To Post It Here
Ok, the anti-state guy's right on this one. That is unfortunately not how cash works. An excess of cash in circulation will automatically rise the cost of goods, Even money follows the laws of supply and demand.
Individuals Can't Make Their Own Rational Decision So Let's Let The Government (A Group Of Individuals) Decide Whats Best For Everyone
This one doesn't check out (the anti-state argument). Why do they think businesses have teams of a specific job? Because the answer one person with one set of knowledge and one skillset comes to a different, and often more incomplete, conclusion than a group of people with a variety of knowledge and skillsets. This was a natural conclusion that even capitalism supports. Again, the focus is on seeming edgy in response without considering the actual argument beyond face value.
We Unanimously Support The People Of Cuba But Above All The Communist Party Of Cuba, The Same One The People Of Cuba Are Revolting Over
If you want to live in a communist controlled country, Go to china, vietnam, north korea, Loas or Cuba....go for it, see how you do. And while you're there, maybe read up as to what happened in every other country the dabbled in communism.
“I’m Literally Trying To Give Everybody Money.”
F**king Based
We Don't Know That Other People Have Feelings, Apparently
Imagine Simping For North Korea
Anyone holding North korea up as any kind of ideal doesn't get to voice opinions in public. Per capita GDP of NK is $790. over 60% of the population lives in extreme poverty. Information control, censorship, no due process, FFS the government mandates acceptable hairstyles. The entire population exists for the benefit of the "Supreme leader" whom both invented the hamburger and learned to drive at the age of 3. Taking any claim coming out of that government at face value is about as dumb as thinking hamas are the good guys.
When You Hate BLM So Much You Become A Communist
Ndt Makes A Rare Valid Point. Smash Mouth Helpfully Proves His Point
Niel's right on this one. He's not saying you shouldn't deal with the shootings, it's just an odd disconnect with the human mind that we've normalized being outraged when 34 people die, but not when a lot more people die from other (often) preventable causes.
Liberal Denies Obama's War Crimes And Is Offended When I Give Evidence
Hmmm. Who Do You Think Created This Problem Chris?
Wars Are Totally Capitalism
Yeah.....starvation, that's America's problem. You people are confusing having to wait for the food your ordered on your glowing brick while you sat on the toilet, with having to stand in line for 12 hours to get bread rations for the week.
Best Statist Comeback Ever
State Worship Creeps Me The F**k Out
This Riot Is A Gift That Keeps On Giving: Trump Supporters Have Profaned Holy Ground
"All Of The Stores Around Me Closed Down! Where Will I Buy Food To Feed My Kids? This Is Capitalism's Fault!"
How Can They Be This Close But Still So Far Away?
I Bet This Person Is A Wonderful Dinner Guest
Anyone remember what lyndon said ahead of the civil rights act being passed? Pepperidge farm 'members. Saying profit is theft is the same as saying your time has no value.....do you also think "the south will rise again"?
Ig Stalin And Mao Weren't Dictators
Labor Theory Of Value At It Again
It's like a personal reminder of why Libertarians and Anarchists are disliked. Mind you, there are plenty of good Libertarians and Anarchists, the problem is that communities of edgelord dudebros like this exist and make the most noise, and the noise they're making is all edge with little substance. These people are SPECIFICALLY why I don't identify as Libertarian. The memes are great, sure, but it's like, who would actually want to be associated with these man-children.
Load More Replies...If those are the "top posts", imagine what the rest are like...
Load More Replies...It's like a personal reminder of why Libertarians and Anarchists are disliked. Mind you, there are plenty of good Libertarians and Anarchists, the problem is that communities of edgelord dudebros like this exist and make the most noise, and the noise they're making is all edge with little substance. These people are SPECIFICALLY why I don't identify as Libertarian. The memes are great, sure, but it's like, who would actually want to be associated with these man-children.
Load More Replies...If those are the "top posts", imagine what the rest are like...
Load More Replies...
