Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
Ever wondered why Greenland looks as big as Africa on the map? It’s because of something called the Mercator projection. Putting a 3-D planet on a two-dimensional world map was challenging for early cartographers. So, a Flemish geographer and cartographer named Gerardus Mercator came up with a solution for the most accurate world map.
In 1569, he designed an atlas that could be accurately used for navigation. Still, the downside was that his system distorted the size of objects depending on their position relative to the equator.
Because of this, landmasses like Antarctica and Greenland appear much bigger than they are. Though there are around 40 types of map projections, from conical to polyhedral and retroazimuthal, depicting the actual size of the world, this one is still used the most because of its convenience and simplicity, even by Google Maps. None of these projections can be titled the real world map because they all depict the same Earth through a different lens.
So, what does the real-world map look like? To show how incorrect our understanding of countries by size is, a website called thetruesize.com lets you move land masses into different locations. This helps you understand the actual size of countries.
We at Bored Panda played a bit with this tool, and what we found will change your perspective on our planet’s geography. The website lets you juxtapose two countries to compare their relative size, and if you’re wondering which countries are the best to live in, we explored that too.
Here’s what the real size of countries looks like.
This post may include affiliate links.
#1
US Moved Down Next To Australia Looks Unbelievably Small
Yvonne Bernal 9 years ago
Size of contiguous United States Not counting Alaska & Hawaii, the 48 contiguous states occupy a combined area of 3.12 million sq. mi. While Australia is 2.99 million sq miles - I never realized they were so close in size!
RELATED:
#2
Russia On The Equator Is Not A Giant Bear Anymore
#3
If Romania Was An Island In The Arctic Ocean
Ema Sklepic 9 years ago
I don't get why the map was done so inaccuratelly? can somone explain?
#4
Australia Is Way Bigger Than You May Think - It Covers Almost The Whole Of Europe
Is Africa Bigger Than it Appears on the Map?
Yes, Africa is significantly larger than it appears on many traditional maps. An interesting fact about the Mercator projection is that it distorts the sizes of landmasses as they get farther from the equator. This distortion disproportionately enlarges countries near the poles while diminishing the size of equatorial regions. As a result, Africa, which straddles the equator, is typically misrepresented as much smaller than it is in reality.
In reality, Africa covers an expansive area of about 11.7 million square miles. Its vastness is often underestimated on conventional maps, leading to misconceptions about its size and significance. On an accurate world map, Africa would appear three times the size of US.
#5
If Brazil Was In Asia It Would Be Massive
Brian Hermann 9 years ago
The map of the earth is a 2 d representation of a 3 d object, that's why the size is different, because the map is distorted.
#6
Indonesia Would Spread Almost Across The Whole Of Russia
#7
Greenland Is Not So Big When Compared To USA And Brazil
#8
When You Move Canada To South America
Laura Mackenzie-Callow 9 years ago
Nope. The width of South America at its widest point is 2,705 miles (4,353 km), The width of Canada at its widest point is 5,780 miles (9,306 km).
What is the Most Realistic World Map?
The AuthaGraph is considered to be the real world map that shows the true size of countries.
Unlike the Mercator projection, which distorts the sizes of landmasses, the AuthaGraph projection aims to maintain equal area property. This means that the relative size of continents and countries is preserved accurately. This is essential for understanding the true proportions of different regions of the world.
The AuthaGraph projection minimizes distortion by dividing the Earth’s surface into 96 regions, which are then transferred to a tetrahedron. This tetrahedron is unfolded and flattened to create a two-dimensional map.
While no projection can be perfect in preserving both area and shape, the AuthaGraph projection comes really close to showing the real size of countries.
#9
California Moved Onto The UK Shows They're Quite Similar In Size
#10
China Placed On Top Of Russia
#11
Australia Moved Onto North America Becomes REALLY Big
#12
Japan Can Stretch Almost Across Canada
Gordon Weir 9 years ago
It all has to do with putting a round object onto a flat, rectangular presentation. Locations near the poles get stretched and distorted, appearing much larger. The point of the map is that IF Japan was in that particular geographic location (closer to the North Pole), it would look much larger when transcribed onto a flat map.
Why is Greenland So Big on the Map?
Greenland appears disproportionately large on the maps due to an inherent distortion in translating the Earth’s three-dimensional, spherical surface onto a two-dimensional map.
The Mercator projection is widely used for navigational purposes because it preserves angles and, therefore, helps sailors navigate straight lines or constant compass headings. However, it doesn’t preserve area or size accurately, particularly as you move away from the equator.
It exaggerates the sizes of landmasses as they approach the poles, causing polar regions to appear much larger than they are in reality.
Greenland is situated near the North Pole, and as a result, it is significantly distorted on Mercator maps. In reality, Greenland is much smaller than it appears on traditional maps. It covers an area of approximately 850,000 square miles, making it only slightly larger than Saudi Arabia (830,000 square miles).
#13
Antarctica Is Not So Much Larger Than Brazil
#14
This Is How India Changes As You Move It North
Yvonne Bernal 9 years ago
Wholly Molley! No wonder I get so many customer service agents in India.... that is one HUGE country.
#15
Canada Moved Down Onto The US Reveals That Both Countries Are Pretty Much The Same Size
Katherine Dagold 9 years ago
but 2/3rds of Canada is uninhabitable because it's in the f-ing article circle.
Stephen Esdaile 9 years ago
But almost all of the USA is unihabitable because of the f-ing Americans...
Load More Replies...
Barry Keleher 9 years ago
This one is actually accurate when backed up by figures. Canada being 9,984,670 sq km and the U.S. being 9,826,630 sq km.
Jack Smith 9 years ago
Except without Alaska, the contiguous 48 are only 8,080,464 sq km. So Alaska makes up almost 20% of the USA's area
Load More Replies...
Tracy Cormier 9 years ago
Except Quebec is not covered in ocean and you have the upper half of Canada transposed over Canada.
Mário Silva Tango 9 years ago
the true way to compare the size diferences of countries is look them at a globe map. There, in a globe, you don´t have mercator projection.
Martin Errington 8 years ago
Funny this should be mentioned; Look at the actual map of the world: https://www.digitalcommonwealth.org/search/commonwealth:7h149v85z Look at the size of Australia in comparison to other land masses. Look at where *Antarctica* is because it's not where we are generally told it is. This also happens to be the same map the U.N uses. This is the actual earth map, and surprise surprise, there is no globe. You live on a flat plane. Even the guy who creates the pictures of earth at NASA admits that beautiful ball we see in pictures, is nothing more than a picture https://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/about/people/RSimmon.html His very words on the NASA website: "Then we wrapped the flat map around a ball. My part was integrating the surface, clouds, and oceans to match people’s expectations of how Earth looks from space" There you go folks
Eugene 2 years ago
You ignore what he mentions earlier in the same paragraph - "a photograph from above low Earth orbit that showed an entire hemisphere (one side of a globe)"
Load More Replies...
Mike Robinson 9 years ago
Wow people get so much at arms with each other over a simple debate. If we are all in Soo much disagreement with each other as we are over simple problems like this it's no wonder we aren't solving bigger problems like hunger and war, or world industrial take over. We are doomed at this rate. If we all have such a vague understanding of these things, the questions we should REALLY start asking is what are we letting our governments teach in our schools, and why are we Soo willing to be mislead and I'll- informed Some of this stuff about maps is interesting. I learned about the proportional indifferences of the mapped lands masses only a few years ago and went..." Huh I didn't know that" , then carried on with my day. We as a people need to realize that no matter how impartial one wants to remain, the history books will all ways be written with some bias. We need to beware that with said biases, comes perspective. That perspective is usually from that of the winning side.
Mike Robinson 9 years ago
Because of this one sided perspective It would be nearly impossible to write the history books without the facts becoming propagandized and skewed. I have also read that the currently accepted maps we use are also a slight representation of the current geo-political paradigm, giving greater/ lesser importance to countries by misrepresenting land masses. The source I read from noted that the G8 countries were of the greater mis proportion. Of coarse that part could be coincidental. until I hear otherwise I remain open to the truth, even in the event that it contradicts what I thought I once knew. That's means also, being prepared to learn I could be wrong in my beliefs. Be nice to each other guys. And know that if you find out one day you were wrong, be okay with that we are not perfect. Also, if you find out one day your right, go easy on your fellow man, we're not perfect.
Load More Replies...
Jamie Laurence 9 years ago
Ok, so I no longer trust a single picture in this article after this one. Now Canada is similar to the USA, when the first picture shows the USA being about the same as Australia, and another picture shows Australia as quite a bit smaller than Canada. Calling BS on this whole thing. Too much contradiction.
J S 9 years ago
Its because Alaska represents almost 20% of the area of USA but it isn't factored into the visual comparison with Australia.
Load More Replies...
Sam Macdonald 9 years ago
Man...this is confusing. How does 4400 miles become smaller than 3300 miles? No matter how hard I try... I can't figure out how Canada becomes smaller than the USA.
Trent Nelson 8 years ago
Statistics that indicate that China and the USA are bigger than Canada are based on land area excluding the surface area of freshwater lakes. When calculated that way, Canada becomes fourth. When freshwater surface area is included, Canada is second.
Load More Replies...
James Kinahan 9 years ago
All you have to do is look at the sq km by country...none of this adds up
Alex Preston 5 years ago
Yeah, except for Nunavut and the Northwest Territories, which on their own are three times the size of Continental Europe.
Brandon Roach 6 years ago
Wow!! I didn't know that! It's totally not like Canada and America are completely lined up with each other! Oh gosh oh gish, i didn't know that!!
Amber Burns Johnson 8 years ago
Really :.. nothing on African???? You can fit half the world in Africa and you guys covered nothing on Africa. Makes me sick. I was just thinking how racist it is to make Africa so small and now I'm seeing completely missing from your article
Mark Harrison 8 years ago
We are so f*****g annoying as a species. We'll argue about anything. I'm bigger! NO! I'm WAAY bigger than you...most of you is uninhabita...shut up you! You're teeny! Blahblahblahfuckingblah Lmao
Marcel Luitze 8 years ago
#15 Canada Moved Down Onto The US Reveals That Both Countries Are Pretty Much The Same Size - Yes, but only if you leave Alaska out from the comparison
keith Reed 8 years ago
this is a big eye opener, i now know that Russia is not so big as it appears on the map!
J S 9 years ago
Chad Boomershine But you don't have to cross a border to get into Nunavut. It's within the contiguous area of Canada. They didn't buy it from another nation. Canada, Australia, China, Brazil and Russia could all decide to form one country. But they'd be a bunch of disjointed pieces of land, like America.
Ernest Solomons 9 years ago
Why did not compare any African country sizes to the rest of tge world?
Debashrita Sarkar 9 years ago
Great compilation, Just one question, where did you get this map of India from in #14? I think the political map of India is a bit different in the regions of Kashmir?
Christy Linn 9 years ago
How are they pretty much the same size when Quebec and all of Atlantic Canada are in the Ocean and the Territories are overlapping ON, SK, and MB?
Matthew Basala 9 years ago
russia is the biggest followed by canada. Then the us is either 3rd or 4thdepending on how you meausre the water in the country with china taking the other. And canada is not largest un ified country. Russia is. You contradict yourself
Dianne McIntyre (Dee) 9 years ago
We as Canadians are taught in grade 4 Geography that our country is the second largest in the world. And we are okay with that!
Hannah Stella Australis 9 years ago
Because the map is a projection, the size of a country depends on its location. If you want real proportions you need to look at a sphere. The proportions on a 2d map are only accurate at the equator. There are several different ways of projecting the round earth onto a piece of paper and each looks different. The one you are familiar with is the one that has proven most useful, because places like Antarctica are very distorted but also to a lot of people not very necessary to depict.
Liberty Dankmeme 8 years ago
the problem with canada is that it's full of liberals - i can deal with snow - just not stupid liberals who want to import sharia terrorists
Mark Hyde 9 years ago
Don't worry about it. If Trump get's in, there'll be nothing left to argue about anyway.
J S 9 years ago
On the plus side, plenty of room for all the Americans to move to Canada to escape Trump
Load More Replies...
J S 9 years ago
Yes, as an island nation, you are at risk of land being under sea level due to melting polar ice from global warming. That makes you different from USA or Canada
Load More Replies...
Ben Lunsford 9 years ago
Canada, the US, and Australia are all basically the same size. All within a few percent of each other.
J S 9 years ago
Canada, USA and China are roughly the same size. Australia is quite a bit smaller, Canada is 2.3 million square kilometers larger than Australia. USA is 2.2 million square kilometers larger than Australia. Australia doesn't make the top 5 for largest countries.
Load More Replies...
Michael Goble 9 years ago
Who are you calling stupid? Nothing to do with Google. All paper maps distort country sizes as you move further north or south of the equator. What these images illustrate is that flat maps seriously distort the sizes so, looking at a map, you get entirely the wrong idea about how countries actually compare with others in size. A normal map shows Australia as being smaller than the US. The illustration here shows that in reality they are almost identical in size.
Load More Replies...
#16
How This All Works
Final score:
26points
Tom Watson 9 years ago
You should move this to the top for the dimwits. This is a great series of posts. Thanks for sharing - fun stuff :D
Is the True Size Map Accurate?
The True Size Of… is an interactive tool that lets you visually compare landmass. It provides a more accurate representation of landmass sizes and minimizes distortion.
#17
USA Compared To Europe
#18
If Poland Was An Island In The Norwegian Sea
#19
The US Could Easily Cover The Whole Of Canada But It Becomes Much Smaller When It's Moved South
#20
When You Move Mexico Onto Greenland Its Size Increases Dramatically
#21
If Lithuania Was An Island In The Barents Sea And Artic Ocean
#22
Moving UK North And South Reveals How It Actually Compares To Other Countries
#23
Democratic Republic Of The Congo When You Move It North
#24
How The Size Of Russia Changes As You Move It South
#27
Let Me Just Make This Easy; The Issue Is Peters (accurate) Vs Mercator (inaccurate).
Final score:
13points
Thorfinn Tait 9 years ago
"Peters" (actually Gall-Peters, as Gall came up with the projection long before) is no truer than Mercator overall. The key phrase here is area: Gall-Peters is designed to preserve relative areas, while Mercator preserves direction and shape. "True representation of land area" and "Incorrect/false representation of land area" are not entirely false statements, but they are too easily read as "Gall-Peters good, Mercator bad!" Which is simply not the case. But despite the famous West Wing scene, in fact there are many better projections than Gall-Peters for showing the whole world — and they have been and continue to be in use in most major publications related to maps and geography for many, many years. There's no single most popular projection, but Mollweide, Winkel Tripel, and perhaps Robinson remain some of the most common. In short: each projection has its own uses, and its own shortcomings. Mercator was never meant to be the only projection ever used.
#28
Alaska Doesn't Seem So Big When Compared To 48 Contiguous States
#29
Texas Moved On Top Of Alaska Shows That They're Almost The Same Size
jason_th_wilson 9 years ago
By almost the same size do you really mean less than half as big as Alaska?
#30
You Cannot Make Legitimate Size Comparison Unless You Are Doing So On An Equal Area Map
Final score:
10points
The second article discusses the inaccuracies of the Mercator projection, similar to the detailed exploration in the first article.
For a deeper look into how maps can distort perceptions of country sizes, you might explore the interesting ways countries are depicted in size.
Add New Image
What do you think ?
Intensive Panda 9 years ago
This is widely known phenomenon: the problem with our world maps is that we try to map a round object on a flat surface. As far as I know, there is no mathematical method to map it 1:1. Because of this setup, our view on countries on world maps are distorted. Also nice fact: depending on where you buy your map, it's different everywhere, as each country places itself in the middle of the map
Gabrielle B Gagné 9 years ago
Fun & true fact : Canada don't place himself in the center on the map, we actually put the Atlantic Ocean/Europe in the center (like #12; #14). This way we don't hurt anyone.
Load More Replies...
Erik Bowie 8 years ago
One thing that never amazes me is the ignorance of people. :)
Load More Replies...
Serena Olij 9 years ago
Too bad the countries of the African continent are so underrepresented in the compared photo's. As far as I know they represent a very big part of the world in actual size!
Keweda Pinnock 8 years ago
EXACLTY my thought. Interesting that it's the only land mass not shown.
Load More Replies...
Milos Gajic 9 years ago
It is a funny and tragic thing at the same time that SO many people don't understand how the geographic projection works. This is elementary school knowledge people, at least where I come from - in fifth grade when children start learning geography they are taught the basics first - like shape of the Earth, the map projections, rotation and revolution of the Earth and it's consequences, etc...
Stan McMunich 9 years ago
Thank you Mr Mercator for giving generations a completely wrong view of the world.
Lou Wow 9 years ago
I don't fully understand this. Can the publisher please explain? I get how California is about the the same size as the UK but the rest are puzzling.
John Ashley 9 years ago
Map distortions are caused by trying to project features on a sphere onto a flat surface. Globes are better for size comparisons between countries and/or continents. About the best map to view earth's features with little distorionon a flat surface is a Bucky Fuller dymaxion map.
Load More Replies...
Laurentiu Jinga 8 years ago
I don't get it. In #28 (Alaska next to the 48 Contiguous States) Alaska (moved South) looks like half (of 48 Contiguous States) and in #29 Texas (moved North) alone looks as the whole Alaska? It shouldn't scale with the same percentage if you move/compare to the North or South of it's original position?
Pokoirl YaSe 7 years ago
Sigh .. Read about the Merc projection. But I will explain, Texas is closer to the equator so it looks smaller than it should compared to other states. So don't imagine the USA as havin'the same scale.
Load More Replies...
Kelsey Clinton 8 years ago
I think you failed to properly explain how you've moved countries around but that they don't actually appear that way in real life (like the Indonesia on Russia map.) I can see a lot of people coming to this page, not reading the intro paragraph, and just looking at the maps and thinking "Wow, Romania's huge!" You really need to make sure that people understand what they're looking at, that intro paragraph does not make it clear for most people that these are not actual sizes. Trust me, my 8th grade students would absolutely NOT read that intro and just look at the maps and take them as fact.
Murray Leaf 3 months ago
This is great stuff. I had not previously appreciated how the distortion introduced by the converging longitudinal lines increases as you get near the poles. Above about 50 degrees n or s.
greggfoley 10 months ago
what's wrong with being curious, if I didn't know something in school my teacher didn't scorn me.
Rosangela Carchen Cezario 1 year ago
Hi, I don't believe in a globe, I'm a FLAT EARTH believer, so I also believe that all these maps are wrong. I just wonder if some days we will find a true map of the Earth so people will not be deceived anymore.
Bill Bolton 5 years ago
Globes have accurate proportionality. But it is difficult to fold one and store it. Although there are some one may deflate.
Josep Barceló 6 years ago
Perhaps too many examples of the very same concept. The Mercator projection distorts sizes. That's all.
Steve Milenkovic 7 years ago
BORING PANDA IS STUPID,LIKE IT WAS SELLING OF ALASKA FOR US RUSSIANS,OR REVOLUTION,BECAUSE FINLAND UKRAINE POLAND,BELARUS KAZAKHSTAN,ETC.,OR 100 YEARS BEFORE.....LIKE THEY DIDNT,BUT EXPLAIN ME PANDA IN KALIFORNIA,THERE IS STILL OLD RUSSIAN MILITARY KAMP..DID YOU HEARD OF THAT MIRACLE??,NOW RUSSIA HAS 17 MILION SQUARE KM AND 11 TIME ZONES,SO IT BIGEST,COUNTRY,WITH STILL ONE OF BEST STATE SEC. ANALITIC, SERVICES,AND ONE OF GREATEST PATRIOTISM AFTER ALL IN RUSSIA NOW LIWES 147 MIL PEOPLE,ONE MAN ON 1000KM2,OR MORE?BIGEST OIL,GAS,WATER,URANIUM ETC.AFTER MONGOLS,KATHOLICS,FALL OF FIRST EMPIRE WITH IVAN THE 4TH,SO CALLED TERIBLE,AND TURKS,OTOMAN EMPIRE,PERSIAN EMPIRE,NAPOLEON,KRIMEAN WAR,WW1.,KOMUNIST REVOLUTION,FALL OF ROMANOVS EMPIRE,STALIN LENIN,USSR,WW2,--HITLER,...CHERCHILL,US,COLD WAR,ETC..RUSSIA ALWAYAS,WON,SO IT WAS THE BIGEST COUNTRY,ONLY WILL RISE,NOT FALL,SERTANLY NOT APART,?OR BECAUSE SOME CASE LIKE CHECNIYA, 33 000 KM2....
Elisha Barren 7 years ago
You forgot Africa and have massively bigger it is than some countries and continents.
Kevin Crawford 8 years ago
Bottom line: Buy a globe if you want to see how countries really compare, size wise, to one another. Because a flat map distorts the sizes of continents the further they are from the equator.
Gjuro Kladaric 8 years ago
but, but, but... lands get "higher" on maps if out of equatorial areas... but things on this maps do get "wider", which simply is not true...
Antonio González Trück 8 years ago
As far as I'm concerned all countries have the same world map.
Robin Lupinacci 8 years ago
Just allow that the lower the latitude more accurate the representation. On Mercator an object at 40 degrees is less accurately represented than one at 15 degrees latitude.
Michael Gary 8 years ago
As much as I love maps, why not just make a list of countries showing total square kilometers.....
Pokoirl YaSe 7 years ago
Because countries aren'squares, and width plays a role on how big they appear
Load More Replies...
Jason Rider 8 years ago
if you want to see countries as they are sized exactly relative to each other, buy a globe
udi 8 years ago
Any attempt to project the surface of a sphere onto a rectangle necessarily involves involves distortions. There are hundreds of different projections, but one recent projection unusually preserves both the relative size and shape of countries, which people might find interesting: http://www.authagraph.com/projects/description/【作品解説】記事01/?lang=en
Sunshine Asomugha 8 years ago
They didn't want to touch the misrepresentation of Africa's size. 🤔
JC Champalaune 8 years ago
This pictures are still misleading (the other way around compared to "usual" maps). For example, China (10 billion km2) is far from being as big as Russia (17). Here it looks about 80% of its size
Dark Matter 8 years ago
It's interesting you didn't compare the continent of Africa, (just the Congo), hum?
Raymundo WW 8 years ago
Hoax? Rank - Country - Area Sq Km 1Russia17,075,200 2Canada9,984,670 3United States of America9,826,630 4China9,596,960 5Brazil8,511,965 6Australia7,686,850 7India3,287,590 8Argentina2,766,890 9Kazakhstan2,717,300 10Algeria2,381,740
Francis Castiglione 8 years ago
so your saying Sth Africa is actually the same width as the Nth of Africa, and Sth America is wide as the United States? what a load of B.S
Edna Guerrero 8 years ago
why don't you move countries of South America to the northem of earth? still doesn't work for you?
Marco Andreas 9 years ago
This is why I prefer to use maps with the "Gall–Peters projection" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gall–Peters_projection
Davo Yoshibima 9 years ago
i would like to see Sudan, Zaire ,Nigeria or even south Africa put on this scale
Ferod. Rosheev 9 years ago
это наебалово, в России 10 часовых поясов, а в Африке 4 но по этой карте они почти равны. Омерикосы опять хуйню подсунули всем - хавайте.
Santhosh Zeus 9 years ago
india map is depicted wrongly . Remember 7-year jail, Rs 100 crore fine for wrong depiction of India map, Check the link below http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/7-year-jail-Rs-100-crore-fine-for-wrong-depiction-of-India-map/articleshow/52133221.cms
Hanam Hamid 9 years ago
I am not so sure with your facts. How did this becomes a fact though?#curious
ҸӲӅӐӪӋӒӍЪ ҶЎԈӚҨӴӔӍӦԜЪ 9 years ago
РОССИЯ САМАЯ ЛУЧШАЯ СТРАНА НА СВЕТЕ! И ВСЕ ОСТАЛЬНЫЕ СТРАНЫ НАМ ЗАВИДУЮТ! 57971f996536f.jpg 
Veronica Daze 9 years ago
Yes but Canada's population is less than the state of California and a lot of their land is uninhabitable.
Mark Farber 9 years ago
Low population, yes, uninhabitable land, no. Look up "Inuit" for further clarification.
Load More Replies...
Matthias Pedro Coscoñas 9 years ago
Interested people out there, there is a much better way of mapping the world, called 'Dymaxion Map' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dymaxion_map), which was developed by Buckminster Fuller. He even considered not having a South nor North on his map as it is equated with 'rich/more developed North' and 'poor/undevelopped South'.
Pemberton 9 years ago
I'd like to see the UK placed in East Asia (or next to Japan). Once my British friend said, 'Sometimes British people say Japan is a tiny island country, but in fact the UK is much smaller than Japan.' Is Great Britain (the main island of the UK) bigger than the Korean peninsula?
Ridwan Khan 9 years ago
well to get the most accurate figure... i divide land area (sq mile) of the apparent largest by the smallest... atleast u will see by how many times the largest is bigger than the smallest
Andrea Mackey 9 years ago
I wonder why they did not do Africa. I think people would of been blown out of their mind I'd they saw how big Africa is.
Milos Gajic 9 years ago
Because Africa is close to the Equator and there is very little distortion going on there during the mapping. So Africa is the most accurate drawn continent on the world map.
Load More Replies...
Callie Giffin 9 years ago
This is cool but I don't full understand it... Could someone explain
Lars Eighner 9 years ago
The problem is there is no completely accurate way to map a round object on a flat map. Think of trying to wrap a soccer ball as a present with flat wrapping paper (or even try it with a small ball and writing paper). You just cannot do it neatly. You end up with lots or folds or wrinkles, or you have to cut the paper into many slices, and you still have overlap and wrinkles. Well, you could wrap the ball in very stretchy cloth. Then you could write "For Bobby, Happy Birthday!" on the cloth. But when you unwrapped the cloth, the message would be badly distorted. So every flat map of the earth is really a lie because the earth is not flat. The standard flat map makes things near the equator look smaller (in comparison to other places) smaller than they are.
Load More Replies... 
Grace Barclay 9 years ago
What about Africa? Does it stay the same, because of the position of it being both north & South? Thanks for the interesting take on the world...
Lars Eighner 9 years ago
Because much of Africa is near the equator, it looks much smaller on a flat map than it is actually is.
Load More Replies...
Hans 9 years ago
Why? The way maps in Mercator Projection are made lead to wrong impressions. To truly compare sizes, you need images like the ones above, flat maps, or something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies_by_area
Load More Replies...
Inbucks Wetrust 9 years ago
:)) Будете много выебываться все будет Россией. Не с чем сравнивать будет.
marcos santiago colombo migliorero 9 years ago
es totalmente cierto, solo hace falta ver como funciona el mapa mundi clasico (el que sigue usando google maps en modo "mapa" por ejemplo") y el de un globo terraquio (o google maps en modo "earth"). Se llama proyeccion de Mercator y es uno de los modos más populares de distorcionar una esfera como nuestro planeta para que pueda ser representada en el plano. A su vez es una representación que obviamente favorece a la posición en el mapa de Europa y Norte América (arriba del mapa y mas grande), por eso se sigue usando tanto.
Load More Replies...
Michael Memmelaar 9 years ago
I can't be the only one who wants to see my penis mapped over Greenland.
Intensive Panda 9 years ago
This is widely known phenomenon: the problem with our world maps is that we try to map a round object on a flat surface. As far as I know, there is no mathematical method to map it 1:1. Because of this setup, our view on countries on world maps are distorted. Also nice fact: depending on where you buy your map, it's different everywhere, as each country places itself in the middle of the map
Gabrielle B Gagné 9 years ago
Fun & true fact : Canada don't place himself in the center on the map, we actually put the Atlantic Ocean/Europe in the center (like #12; #14). This way we don't hurt anyone.
Load More Replies... Erik Bowie 8 years ago
One thing that never amazes me is the ignorance of people. :)
Load More Replies... Serena Olij 9 years ago
Too bad the countries of the African continent are so underrepresented in the compared photo's. As far as I know they represent a very big part of the world in actual size!
Keweda Pinnock 8 years ago
EXACLTY my thought. Interesting that it's the only land mass not shown.
Load More Replies... Milos Gajic 9 years ago
It is a funny and tragic thing at the same time that SO many people don't understand how the geographic projection works. This is elementary school knowledge people, at least where I come from - in fifth grade when children start learning geography they are taught the basics first - like shape of the Earth, the map projections, rotation and revolution of the Earth and it's consequences, etc...
Stan McMunich 9 years ago
Thank you Mr Mercator for giving generations a completely wrong view of the world.
Lou Wow 9 years ago
I don't fully understand this. Can the publisher please explain? I get how California is about the the same size as the UK but the rest are puzzling.
John Ashley 9 years ago
Map distortions are caused by trying to project features on a sphere onto a flat surface. Globes are better for size comparisons between countries and/or continents. About the best map to view earth's features with little distorionon a flat surface is a Bucky Fuller dymaxion map.
Load More Replies... Laurentiu Jinga 8 years ago
I don't get it. In #28 (Alaska next to the 48 Contiguous States) Alaska (moved South) looks like half (of 48 Contiguous States) and in #29 Texas (moved North) alone looks as the whole Alaska? It shouldn't scale with the same percentage if you move/compare to the North or South of it's original position?
Pokoirl YaSe 7 years ago
Sigh .. Read about the Merc projection. But I will explain, Texas is closer to the equator so it looks smaller than it should compared to other states. So don't imagine the USA as havin'the same scale.
Load More Replies... Kelsey Clinton 8 years ago
I think you failed to properly explain how you've moved countries around but that they don't actually appear that way in real life (like the Indonesia on Russia map.) I can see a lot of people coming to this page, not reading the intro paragraph, and just looking at the maps and thinking "Wow, Romania's huge!" You really need to make sure that people understand what they're looking at, that intro paragraph does not make it clear for most people that these are not actual sizes. Trust me, my 8th grade students would absolutely NOT read that intro and just look at the maps and take them as fact.
Murray Leaf 3 months ago
This is great stuff. I had not previously appreciated how the distortion introduced by the converging longitudinal lines increases as you get near the poles. Above about 50 degrees n or s.
greggfoley 10 months ago
what's wrong with being curious, if I didn't know something in school my teacher didn't scorn me.
Rosangela Carchen Cezario 1 year ago
Hi, I don't believe in a globe, I'm a FLAT EARTH believer, so I also believe that all these maps are wrong. I just wonder if some days we will find a true map of the Earth so people will not be deceived anymore.
Bill Bolton 5 years ago
Globes have accurate proportionality. But it is difficult to fold one and store it. Although there are some one may deflate.
Josep Barceló 6 years ago
Perhaps too many examples of the very same concept. The Mercator projection distorts sizes. That's all.
Steve Milenkovic 7 years ago
BORING PANDA IS STUPID,LIKE IT WAS SELLING OF ALASKA FOR US RUSSIANS,OR REVOLUTION,BECAUSE FINLAND UKRAINE POLAND,BELARUS KAZAKHSTAN,ETC.,OR 100 YEARS BEFORE.....LIKE THEY DIDNT,BUT EXPLAIN ME PANDA IN KALIFORNIA,THERE IS STILL OLD RUSSIAN MILITARY KAMP..DID YOU HEARD OF THAT MIRACLE??,NOW RUSSIA HAS 17 MILION SQUARE KM AND 11 TIME ZONES,SO IT BIGEST,COUNTRY,WITH STILL ONE OF BEST STATE SEC. ANALITIC, SERVICES,AND ONE OF GREATEST PATRIOTISM AFTER ALL IN RUSSIA NOW LIWES 147 MIL PEOPLE,ONE MAN ON 1000KM2,OR MORE?BIGEST OIL,GAS,WATER,URANIUM ETC.AFTER MONGOLS,KATHOLICS,FALL OF FIRST EMPIRE WITH IVAN THE 4TH,SO CALLED TERIBLE,AND TURKS,OTOMAN EMPIRE,PERSIAN EMPIRE,NAPOLEON,KRIMEAN WAR,WW1.,KOMUNIST REVOLUTION,FALL OF ROMANOVS EMPIRE,STALIN LENIN,USSR,WW2,--HITLER,...CHERCHILL,US,COLD WAR,ETC..RUSSIA ALWAYAS,WON,SO IT WAS THE BIGEST COUNTRY,ONLY WILL RISE,NOT FALL,SERTANLY NOT APART,?OR BECAUSE SOME CASE LIKE CHECNIYA, 33 000 KM2....
Elisha Barren 7 years ago
You forgot Africa and have massively bigger it is than some countries and continents.
Kevin Crawford 8 years ago
Bottom line: Buy a globe if you want to see how countries really compare, size wise, to one another. Because a flat map distorts the sizes of continents the further they are from the equator.
Gjuro Kladaric 8 years ago
but, but, but... lands get "higher" on maps if out of equatorial areas... but things on this maps do get "wider", which simply is not true...
Antonio González Trück 8 years ago
As far as I'm concerned all countries have the same world map.
Robin Lupinacci 8 years ago
Just allow that the lower the latitude more accurate the representation. On Mercator an object at 40 degrees is less accurately represented than one at 15 degrees latitude.
Michael Gary 8 years ago
As much as I love maps, why not just make a list of countries showing total square kilometers.....
Pokoirl YaSe 7 years ago
Because countries aren'squares, and width plays a role on how big they appear
Load More Replies... Jason Rider 8 years ago
if you want to see countries as they are sized exactly relative to each other, buy a globe
udi 8 years ago
Any attempt to project the surface of a sphere onto a rectangle necessarily involves involves distortions. There are hundreds of different projections, but one recent projection unusually preserves both the relative size and shape of countries, which people might find interesting: http://www.authagraph.com/projects/description/【作品解説】記事01/?lang=en
Sunshine Asomugha 8 years ago
They didn't want to touch the misrepresentation of Africa's size. 🤔
JC Champalaune 8 years ago
This pictures are still misleading (the other way around compared to "usual" maps). For example, China (10 billion km2) is far from being as big as Russia (17). Here it looks about 80% of its size
Dark Matter 8 years ago
It's interesting you didn't compare the continent of Africa, (just the Congo), hum?
Raymundo WW 8 years ago
Hoax? Rank - Country - Area Sq Km 1Russia17,075,200 2Canada9,984,670 3United States of America9,826,630 4China9,596,960 5Brazil8,511,965 6Australia7,686,850 7India3,287,590 8Argentina2,766,890 9Kazakhstan2,717,300 10Algeria2,381,740
Francis Castiglione 8 years ago
so your saying Sth Africa is actually the same width as the Nth of Africa, and Sth America is wide as the United States? what a load of B.S
Edna Guerrero 8 years ago
why don't you move countries of South America to the northem of earth? still doesn't work for you?
Marco Andreas 9 years ago
This is why I prefer to use maps with the "Gall–Peters projection" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gall–Peters_projection
Davo Yoshibima 9 years ago
i would like to see Sudan, Zaire ,Nigeria or even south Africa put on this scale
Ferod. Rosheev 9 years ago
это наебалово, в России 10 часовых поясов, а в Африке 4 но по этой карте они почти равны. Омерикосы опять хуйню подсунули всем - хавайте.
Santhosh Zeus 9 years ago
india map is depicted wrongly . Remember 7-year jail, Rs 100 crore fine for wrong depiction of India map, Check the link below http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/7-year-jail-Rs-100-crore-fine-for-wrong-depiction-of-India-map/articleshow/52133221.cms
Hanam Hamid 9 years ago
I am not so sure with your facts. How did this becomes a fact though?#curious
ҸӲӅӐӪӋӒӍЪ ҶЎԈӚҨӴӔӍӦԜЪ 9 years ago
РОССИЯ САМАЯ ЛУЧШАЯ СТРАНА НА СВЕТЕ! И ВСЕ ОСТАЛЬНЫЕ СТРАНЫ НАМ ЗАВИДУЮТ! 57971f996536f.jpg
Veronica Daze 9 years ago
Yes but Canada's population is less than the state of California and a lot of their land is uninhabitable.
Mark Farber 9 years ago
Low population, yes, uninhabitable land, no. Look up "Inuit" for further clarification.
Load More Replies... Matthias Pedro Coscoñas 9 years ago
Interested people out there, there is a much better way of mapping the world, called 'Dymaxion Map' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dymaxion_map), which was developed by Buckminster Fuller. He even considered not having a South nor North on his map as it is equated with 'rich/more developed North' and 'poor/undevelopped South'.
Pemberton 9 years ago
I'd like to see the UK placed in East Asia (or next to Japan). Once my British friend said, 'Sometimes British people say Japan is a tiny island country, but in fact the UK is much smaller than Japan.' Is Great Britain (the main island of the UK) bigger than the Korean peninsula?
Ridwan Khan 9 years ago
well to get the most accurate figure... i divide land area (sq mile) of the apparent largest by the smallest... atleast u will see by how many times the largest is bigger than the smallest
Andrea Mackey 9 years ago
I wonder why they did not do Africa. I think people would of been blown out of their mind I'd they saw how big Africa is.
Milos Gajic 9 years ago
Because Africa is close to the Equator and there is very little distortion going on there during the mapping. So Africa is the most accurate drawn continent on the world map.
Load More Replies... Callie Giffin 9 years ago
This is cool but I don't full understand it... Could someone explain
Lars Eighner 9 years ago
The problem is there is no completely accurate way to map a round object on a flat map. Think of trying to wrap a soccer ball as a present with flat wrapping paper (or even try it with a small ball and writing paper). You just cannot do it neatly. You end up with lots or folds or wrinkles, or you have to cut the paper into many slices, and you still have overlap and wrinkles. Well, you could wrap the ball in very stretchy cloth. Then you could write "For Bobby, Happy Birthday!" on the cloth. But when you unwrapped the cloth, the message would be badly distorted. So every flat map of the earth is really a lie because the earth is not flat. The standard flat map makes things near the equator look smaller (in comparison to other places) smaller than they are.
Load More Replies... Grace Barclay 9 years ago
What about Africa? Does it stay the same, because of the position of it being both north & South? Thanks for the interesting take on the world...
Lars Eighner 9 years ago
Because much of Africa is near the equator, it looks much smaller on a flat map than it is actually is.
Load More Replies... Hans 9 years ago
Why? The way maps in Mercator Projection are made lead to wrong impressions. To truly compare sizes, you need images like the ones above, flat maps, or something like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependencies_by_area
Load More Replies... Inbucks Wetrust 9 years ago
:)) Будете много выебываться все будет Россией. Не с чем сравнивать будет.
marcos santiago colombo migliorero 9 years ago
es totalmente cierto, solo hace falta ver como funciona el mapa mundi clasico (el que sigue usando google maps en modo "mapa" por ejemplo") y el de un globo terraquio (o google maps en modo "earth"). Se llama proyeccion de Mercator y es uno de los modos más populares de distorcionar una esfera como nuestro planeta para que pueda ser representada en el plano. A su vez es una representación que obviamente favorece a la posición en el mapa de Europa y Norte América (arriba del mapa y mas grande), por eso se sigue usando tanto.
Load More Replies... Michael Memmelaar 9 years ago
I can't be the only one who wants to see my penis mapped over Greenland.
You May Like 49 Fascinating Photos Revealing What The World’s Capitals Looked Like Way Before Modern Times 43 Foreigners Share Traits That Instantly Reveal Someone Is American
Viktorija Strelciunaite
Dominyka Proškėnaitė
Related on Bored Panda
