30 Times Idiots Did Something That Wasn’t Against The Rules So A Rule Was Created
Interview With AuthorIf there’s one thing the world will never run short of, it’s human stupidity. Spend just a few minutes online and you’ll find plenty of evidence, but this recent Reddit thread might be the best example yet.
Here, people gathered to share the most ridiculous rules they’ve encountered, all of which exist because someone once made a shockingly dumb decision. Scroll down to enjoy these hilarious precedents, and don’t forget to upvote your favorites—they deserve some credit for making us all feel a little smarter!
This post may include affiliate links.
Taking your shoes off going through airport security because one guy had a sneaker that contained a small explosive. Thank god he didn’t hide a bomb up his a*s.
Wasn't a small explosive. He was trained at an Al-Qaeda camp, and both of his shoes were adapted to properly fit the bottom full of plastic explosives. Just lucky he was discovered trying to light them and was subdued.
last time i flew i had to pull my shirt up to the bottom of my bra and get swabbed for explosives in the TSA line and argue with the TSA about not xraying my insulin pump (it can destroy it) because there was some chatter in the early 2000s where someone discussed hiding explosives in a prosthetic leg. since then people have had their sterile medical supplies opened, have to remove mastectomy prostheses in public for inspection, a teen girl was forced to have her insulin pump xrayed and it messed up the dose calibration* to be nearly fatal. (*insulin pump dosing is calculated using the decay rate of a tiny TINY bit of radioactive material). to be clear: the prosthetic leg thing was a hypothetical discussion online between suspect individuals and as far as anyone knows, it was never actually put into action. it just triggered a whole cascade of additional scrutiny over medical devices/replacement body parts
Sorry that sucks, they need better training. But the flip side is that as soon as they give a pass to 'old ladies in wheelchairs' (as many people suggest and get outraged about) then terrorists will take advantage of that hole in security
Load More Replies...Unlike in the UK where someone arrived at a hospital with a live WWII shell in his r.e.c.t.u.m. . .
They already came up with the Underwear Bomber, so they're only a push of the thumb away from this already.
Load More Replies...Airport security is way too much, calm down, the whole process takes forever and is incredibly stressful.
We don't have to take off our shoes at airport security since a long time, do we?
Every airport has different machines and different machines required different rules. But as of July, 2025, the shoes-off policy has ended.
Load More Replies...
On almost every clothes iron in the United States there is a warning label to “not iron your clothes while wearing them.” I assume there’s a few stories behind that warning.
I have heard of a few stories online of people thinking that the warning is stupid, doing just that, and getting a nice burn.
If someone is dumb enough to think it's a good idea to press a 240c hunk of high heat capacity metal against themselves....they're probably not big on "fancy letters" This kind of c**p is pure a*s covering on the part of manufactures/businesses, because somehow failing to state the obvious is grounds for a lawsuit, because judges, juries and lawyers refuse to laugh the kind of idiots that do this dumb $hit out of courtrooms.
That was a normal thing from the 60's until flat irons became readily available.
Load More Replies...There is a warning on birthday candles not to insert into the ear. I had to ask the person who told me this years ago why? Because of ear candles, which really don't work. But wax candles wouldn't work anyway.
I like the one on the toaster, Do Not Use In The Bathtub!! I know it is because electricity and water don't mix and it can be used for Sui*cide, but really now, who wants to make toast while taking a bath????!!!!????
I've done it. I didn't get hurt in any way whatsoever. But I did use a low setting and made sure the steam function was off. I also have a high tolerance to heat, so I don't recommend trying it.
Seriously America, it seems you can literally sue some company just for not accommodating f*****g common sense!
Anyone can file a lawsuit. Even if the judge tosses it, it still costs the company to defend until it is dismissed
Load More Replies...Stupid people plus litigation equals insulting warnings to people with average intelligence.
It's possible I've ironed something at the last minute after I was already wearing it. But I'm not so stupid that I put the iron against my skin. More like I spread my skirt out on the ironing board. Yes, I'm a horrible procrastinator. :)
The replies in this Reddit thread might have you doubting the existence of common sense, but they’re nothing short of entertaining. Bored Panda connected with the post’s creator, u/seequelbeepwell, to find out what inspired them to ask the question.
“I was watching YouTube videos about life in Japan and noticed how much trust they place in people to do the right thing,” they told us. “It got me thinking that maybe Western culture is different because we seem to have a few bad apples that end up creating most of the rules.”
To their surprise, the responses didn’t quite match their expectations. “I would’ve thought Florida would come up more, but Alabama seemed to take the crown,” they said. “A lot of people were venting about work-related rules. Reddit is on the side of the lady who spilled McDonald’s coffee on herself.”
I worked in an office where one numb nut decided to take his lunch break at 4pm everyday so he could leave early. Manager said to stop doing that. So he quit taking a lunch break Monday-Thursday. On Friday, he took all 5 lunch breaks at once and went home at noon. After that the manager assigned everyone a lunch break time. If you didn’t take it during your assigned hour you did not get a lunch break. It felt like the most Mickey Mouse middle school rule ever. Magically, that rule went away after numb nut was fired a couple of months later.
ETA: We were a customer-facing department. We had to ensure coverage for walk ins, appointments, phone calls, etc. if this wasn’t the case I doubt manager would have cared when we took lunch.
The last part makes everything completely reasonable. I take my break whenever at work, because I'm not front-of-house staff, so whatever mayhem is going down on the sales floor, I can't come out and deal with it anyway. As long as I take my allowed time and come back, no one cares. If the person running the registers did that, there would be a problem.
"whatever mayhem is going down on the sales floor" lol
Load More Replies...My last company required all employees to work 8 hours + a 1 hour lunch break. Except you were heavily encouraged to take your lunch at your desk while working. So really, it was a 9 hour work day. One exception was that employees were allowed to go for a stroll after eating their lunch. This really meant a walk around the building (takes 10 minutes is you walk real slow). Not me, I took my 1 hour walk, every day. Found a 19th century cemetery nearby, and explored, listened to music. Lost 40 lbs in one year, found some really cool nooks in that graveyard, and enjoyed my break.
We had a similar rule and encouragement to est in your desk and keep working to meet endlines, but then a coworker spilled his coffee in his keyboard (wireless apple keyboard, expensive) and a new rule was set to not eat in your desk, so productivity took a down. Several week after, that rule was turned down but few resumed eating on their desks.
Load More Replies...This would not work in Germany as you would need to have worked after your break to get it count as a break.
We now have the utter stupidity on the rail unions that if a manager says hello to someone in the 59th minute of their break, they get to have another hour off because they "must have an hour free from work". Unions can do a lot of good, but this is hardly great for business.
Better some silliness, than the alternative without unions I suppose. And this nonsense only gets into policy because management agreed to it. Unions aren't all-powerful
Load More Replies...I was an office manager when I was younger and I supervised all the admin assistants. And after listening to them argue about who was going to lunch at what time, then coming to me to complain I had to make a set schedule. I was in my 20's and these women were mostly old enough to be my mother! It was like running a daycare.
There's always that self-centered jerk of a person who will game the system and make everyone else's life hell.
That sounds like a very smart employee! If you are paid to work 8 hours and don't want to be there for 9, they should allow you to come in later or leave earlier. No matter what time you take a lunch hour you are not available for customers and it's not rocket surgery for mgmt to adjust coverage accordingly. STOP being a slave to corporate BS.
Proper labour laws would prevent this. Here you have to take atleast 30 mins break after 4 hours of work. For both parties it's also the best.
There was a rule against hanging off pipes at an old job because someone tried doing chin-ups on them. Pulled the pipes out of their bracketing and flooded the entire building.
Good thing he (I assume) did all those chin-ups. Strong arms are essential for swimming.
Dumb, but also construction not up to code. Any exposed piping should be able to sustain its own weight at full load, plus no less than 250 lb at each point (typically, it's calculated at the halfway point between two supports), multiplied by a typical safety factor of x1.25/1.5. Any pipe that breaks from an average person hanging from it is a badly designed or badly installed pipe.
Our health & safety inspector nearly had a coronary when he saw that we use the gas pipe as hanging rail. We've got clothes, a bike rack, a hanging shelf system, storage bags, etc all hanging off this one pipe in the back room. The thing is, there is no gas on this whole street, They turned it off years ago. The cast iron fittings are the most secure in the building.
I was thinking the same thing...also, those aren't water pipes.
Load More Replies...On the funnier side, early 80's, hanging out with my older sister at Udub (Univ. of Washington) on the weekends. A male aquaintance liked to hang off the tangle of pipes in the corridors and yes, his nickname was Sloth.
Warning tags on Halloween costumes “this cape does not give the wearer the ability to fly”.
I have a scar over my eye proving that I was once 100% certain that a cape would give me the ability to fly. I think I was four years old.
Luckily I don't have any scars from it but I did try jumping off the roof and using an umbrella for a parachute. Ruined a perfectly good umbrella.
Load More Replies...There's still time to label all brooms and mops with the "this does not actually fly" -sticker before halloween.
As a 7 year old, I had a very convincing dream in which flying was like floating in water, and if you just held your body the right way, you would be able to levitate. I spent several days jumping off the back of the sofa trying to duplicate the feeling before I finally admitted that it just doesn't work that way when you're awake. I still have the floating dreams.
I occasionally fly in my dreams, but they always start with me running, and the steps keep getting longer and longer until I'm flying.
Load More Replies..."He's one of those who knows that life Is just a leap of faith. Spread your arms and hold your breath and always trust your cape"
But they don't say they're not bulletproof. Can't wait to test my Batman's cape.
I talked my little brother into jumping off the shed with an umbrella. We seriously thought it would work.
One Redditor, u/ribbediguana, shared a particularly funny story about her office banning post-its after someone missed an important message. She gave us the full scoop on what led to the unexpected rule change.
“It was a very small recruitment company,” she explained. “Honestly, the person who wrote the note could’ve just delivered the information directly. A client called in on a Friday, right before lunch, needing a temp for Monday. The person who was supposed to handle it—the one who received the post-it—was out at a client lunch. Back then, if you weren’t out drinking with clients on a Friday, you weren’t working hard enough!”
“The person who took the message left the post-it on her co-worker’s desk,” she continued. “But it wasn’t seen, the role didn’t get filled, and it made the company look bad. The business owner was furious on Monday, and a lot of passive aggression filled our tiny office of just five people.”
The fallout was intense. “The person who lost the message was demoted for a month, losing out on commission. The co-worker who missed the note quit shortly after. I didn’t last long either—the whole thing was a neon red flag for the emotional state of the business owner.”
Decades ago, I was shopping at a toy store, looking for a Lego table. I found a flat Lego table box, picture of two kids sitting at the table (fully constructed). The label read, I s**t you not, “children not included” .
Either it was a joke, or they got a complaint from a very disappointed pa3d0ph1le.
LEGO is Danish and for that reason I can guarantee you it's a joke. We love dry jokes that go over most people's heads 😆
Load More Replies...I used to complain when shopping in baby warehouse that there were many running/lying around in the aisles, and some even crawling on the shelves, but could they let me know which babies were available for purchase please?! It was annoying having access to all the cute clothes/accessories etc and not being able to get an actual baby, and it was called baby warehouse after all. Gotta say when you're trying hard to have one of your own and others are neglecting and under appreciating theirs it did always seem just a tad unfair... luckily 10years of "planning" finally paid off
Are you saying Wayfair does supply the children?
Load More Replies...Sounds like danish humour to me, and being danish I think I would recognise it.
Load More Replies...
Employees must wear appropriate undergarments. As the manager at the time, I was involved in too many conversations that were part of what eventually led to this policy. No underwear with see through pants, bras showing, visibly lacking bras, underwear visible through clothes, strings pretending to be underwear that were visible above pants. I feel like I’ve seen it all. I counseled many employees on professional attire.
He's sad because he can no longer see boobs and butts at work.
Load More Replies...We had a well endowed young woman who not only went braless but wore a fishnet shirt to boot leaving nothing to the imagination. After about 3 hours she stormed into HR to file a complaint that everyone was staring at her and she felt violated. I don't think that meeting turned out the way she imagined it would.
...... Jesus actual christ, what was she even /thinking/?!
Load More Replies...Did the "no visibly lacking bras" rule only apply to women? 😬
Load More Replies...So you can't have the bra showing, but you must wear one, how does management check? I would leave the company that dictates my choice of underwear.
I worked at a hospital where we were issued white pants and blue shirts as standart attire. Now those pants were old and some threadbare. At one point management decided to issue a new policy that only black or white underware and socks were allowed. I told my boss the first person to point out my "nonconform" underware would be reported for harrassment as the whole policy was against the law. Yeah, they never implemented the new policy. It sparked a new trend however: people from the ER and Radiology started to wear the most colorful socks they could find 🤣🤣 we compared 😁 I got fe Swiss and German socks, one guy from the ER had brown socks with eyes and pink socks with squirrels. 😇
Load More Replies...You can't force anyone to wear a bra. These things do more harm than good anyway.
I was wondering how that would work. Me personally I'm more comfortable in a bra than not because of my size and the fact I've worn one most my life. But, I couldn't imagine telling someone they have to wear one. The only thing I could think of was for safety reasons like how you have to put your hair up or not wear jewelry in some jobs, maybe something like that then fine, but an office job? Go braless if you want. Just don't wear a see through top no matter your gender.
Load More Replies...My moms old job had a dress code that said "no thongs" and she was like...who's checking for that?? Thinking it meant the underwear. She asked and found out they meant flip-flops. :P
U less you are forcing men to wear bras too the bra policy is sexist. We don't have to wear bras if we don't want to
You also don't have to work at that company if you don't want to
Load More Replies...There is a kind middle aged man who comes and plays music for the seniors at the home I work at but yah he bent over showing a bright red thong 😱
Underwear with see through pants? If thoroughly covered with pants, why would that be a problem?
If the pants are see through, you could see the underwear.
Load More Replies...Depends on the workplace. If we're talking about a job dealing with clients (outside of obvious exceptions like pr0stitution) I'd expect people to dress "properly". If we're talking cubicle sitting I'd apply far less strict rules. If coworkers are that obsessed with their colleagues' attires they're clearly not paying enough attention to their work (unless the would-be stripper hogs other people's desks, presenting their improperly dressed parts)
Load More Replies...
My Alma mater now has a line in the student handbook that charcoal grills are not permitted in the dorm rooms.
Understandable. It's actually dangerous if you use charcoal grills in a closed room. You can die from lack of oxygen. People have actually died from it.
A whole family here died because they did that years ago. They were using the charcoal grill as a heater inside their home.
When I was touring, I visited a school where the student guide mentioned that the dorms were super strict about fire hazards (not just the usual ones like candles and hot plates, but the stuff that will never cause a problem 999 times out of a thousand unless you do something stupid with it, like power strips) and the fire department did an inspection *every month.* That was an immediate 'wait, what have you guys done to p**s off the fire department?' flag.
Was this a really well known school on the east coast, with dormitories built out of wood four hundred years ago?
Load More Replies...I don't understand why so-called intelligent people would do this in the first place
My most friendly explanations are "brain fart" or "a rebellious mind". Less kindly: they're only "supposedly" intelligent.
Load More Replies...My college had to clearly write out the rule “No flushing chicken carcasses down the toilet.” Because two lazy boys didn’t want to take out the garbage after they ate two entire rotisserie chickens.
Many years ago, I read about this poor family living in some hovel without electricity using a grill in the bathroom and the fatal results.
They used to be allowed? Or did the uni suddenly realize they needed such a rule?
I'm guessing a student died of asphyxiation after attempting this in their dorm
Load More Replies...After the post-it ban, the company’s solution was to use a carbon copy phone message pad and still leave the note on the desk, but follow it up with an email. “Yet, there were no changes to the rule about getting tipsy with clients on a Friday!” u/ribbediguana said.
“And that was only the beginning,” she added. “The business owner also told us we needed to ‘look more expensive’—this coming from someone who constantly had food on her shirt and stockings around her ankles.”
This rule was put in place thanks to a recruiter who dared to wear flat shoes to a client visit. “We were told we had to wear stilettos, suits, cufflinks, and jackets—even in 104-degree weather,” u/ribbediguana said.
In the end, it seemed the boss was the common problem. “She was a mess,” u/ribbediguana summarized. “I’ve worked at three recruitment firms, and they all had the same type of women running the show. Let’s just say, I’m not a fan of recruitment anymore!”
The "no drinking allowed at work" rule at my job is because of me back when I was an alcoholic.
Before that it wasn't an official rule because they just assumed everyone would realize it wasn't allowed.
Got it written in the handbook and everything! I'm a bringer of change.
Where I live it's against the law to drink out on the street and nobody seems to pay attention to this
There's a comedian with a joke about this, getting arrested for being drunk in public after being kicked out of a bar. "I wasn't trying to be drunk in public, I was trying to be drunk in a bar! They PUT me in public!"
Load More Replies...Bear in mind that the three martini lunch was not like a joke somebody made up... throughout the seventies and well into the eighties, it was not at all uncommon to expect someone to have a couple of drinks during lunch and then come back to work - and occasionally if things were going well, to have a celebratory drink *at* work - passed around by the boss, who of course, had a well stocked bar in his office
I worked at a place during the 1990s where my boss kept a bottle of good single-malt Scotch in his desk drawer. Occasionally he would get on the PA and page the office: "All Scotch drinkers, report to Dave's office!" Generally on a quiet afternoon when not many people were in the office, like Christmas Eve.
Load More Replies...As opposed the place I worked in Denmark which had a vending machine that dispensed beer. I miss working there! :D
When I studied in Italy you could get beer at the beverage dispenser, and sometimes a bottled beer instead of fruit or desert. Totally acceptable to have a drink with your lunch!
Load More Replies...When I was an intern, we had a dude at the factory always carrying stuff on those ... hand carriers for pallets. Every beverage vending machine had beer in them, I was told it was a compromise because the alcoholicians used to smuggle in hard stuff in water bottles after they revoked the beer from the machines, and there was talk about unproductive hours once they reached two digits, if not earlier, through till everybody went home. Anyway, Eugen, the dude mentioned above, always stopped at EVERY vending machine he came by, bought two bottles, downed one and put the other in his pocket, continued and, whenever he came by one again (there were 2 or 3 scattered around in a small factory consisting of several small and large buildings of different age and original designation, so it may very well happen to not cross one for hourse, or to basically oscillate in front of one), put in the empty bottle and bought another two. Directly afterwards, I was an intern in another company, and met a guy I knew from Uni. He said I might have met his uncle at the previous company, his name's Eugen, ... oh my, yes, I have, he tried to invite me to drink with him, but as I don't drink, ... well ... being drunk at school was funny, sort of. But got boring pretty ... pretty instantly.
Sounds like you're doing better now, so big congratulations!! Getting sober is no small feat (my experience is: been in recovery 8 years, worked for 6+years in treatment for SUD/co-occurring disorders/criminal justice). I hope you're able to be proud of yourself and are practicing kindness and gentleness towards yourself. If not, don't worry. You'll find your own version of self love and self-acceptance in your own time!
Man it makes my stomach hurt thinking about this - but all those signs at the Hoover Dam that tell you not to put your dog on the railing… How many puppies fell in the Hoover Damn for this sign to exist?!
This made me cry about the terror the little puppy felt falling down after trusting it's owner and then dying T.T
I'm surprised someone hasn't done that with their kid. Some idiot let their 3 year old sit on the rock wall of the alligator pit (6 foot with tail that he bit off himself) at Miami Serpentarium & he fell in & was killed by the gator years ago. It was the beginning of the end of Serpentarium since the owner, Dr. Haast, was so devastated. He actually caught & milked cobras in front of an audience. The man had been bitten hundreds of times & even donated his blood to snake bite victims since he had allowed himself to be bitten (and sometimes accidentally) so many times they used his blood for snake bite victims. He sold the Serpentarium & moved to west Florida to continue his scientific work & the giant cobra that was on top of the Serpentarium was donated to to South MIami High School Cobras. Some parents (and pet owners) are just idiots. I learned to like & hold snakes there & so did many other kids.
Load More Replies...It also means they didn't secure a leash to their dog before making such a negligent decision. Some people should just stick to house plants.
I swear my daughters treated our pets like they were plushys. They grew out of it, but how many do not?
No kid should have to "grow out" of treating pets like plushys. You, as a parent, should teach them from the get-go that live animals are not toys. Why do you think so many kids get bitten every year? If you can't teach your kid this simple thing, then find a new home for either the pets or the kids, since you're obviously not vested in the safety of either one.
Load More Replies...
I worked in a place where post it notes were banned. Because a person once wrote something important, and stuck it on another persons desk but it fell off.
Unfortunate, but I can understand why it was changed. A post-it note doesn't seem like a good way to convey something important anyway.
Yes but banning post its is not the way to go. What if they now write it on a piece of toilet paper?
Load More Replies...I work in a lab and one colleague would only communicate with post-it notes which irritated everybody, so one day when she came in she found her white lab coat completely covered in a rainbow of post-it's and after that she never used one again
I'm sorry but that's hilarious - i would have been thoroughly thrilled to find a lab coat completely covered it in a rainbow of post-its!
Load More Replies...Same reason our attorneys are forbidden from only emailing court docs. Poof! Gone! Huge penalty! No thanks!
As for u/seequelbeepwell, they don’t think it’s the rules themselves that are ridiculous, but rather when people knowingly dismiss them. “For example, I ate expired salad dressing the other day,” they confessed. “I saw the expiration date and still went ahead with it. Let’s just say it was one of those bathroom moments that required a shower afterward.”
“On that note, I think my next post will be the opposite,” said u/seequelbeepwell. “What are some everyday goods and services that seem like they were created specifically for idiots?”
And we at Bored Panda can’t wait to see that one—stay tuned!
Label on engine oil: “not safe for human consumption.” Thanks, Fast and the Furious.
There's a comedian who did routine where he read the box that his replacement fan belt came in. The warning said, "DO NOT INSTALL WHILE ENGINE IS RUNNING".
I'm not 100% certain, but I don't think anti-freeze is safe for human consumption even if it looks like liquid cotton candy.
Aww! Why did you have to tell me it looks like liquid cotton candy? As a non-driver I didn't know that, but now I want cotton candy!
Load More Replies...The word oil, someone placing it on a kitchen counter top, someone else with dementia or brain injuries or learning difficulties . . . I don't think it hurts anyone to put this warning on.
That's kind of what I was thinking. There are a million types of oils out there and a lot can be consumed. So, is it really necessary for fully functioning people to have this warning? Maybe not, but for anyone in a hurry, or like you mentioned with any kind of hindrance to their ability to understand it's not cooking oil, I don't think this one is necessarily a dumb warning.
Load More Replies...Oil is oil, surely. I was just going to put the fryer on to cook some chips, sorry I mean fries! /s
Funny story: Seed oils were originally designed as a lubricant for tanks in WW2. After the war they didn't want to stop making it because the equipment to produce it was really expensive. Sooooooo they started selling it to people to eat. Vegetable and seed oils are really really bad for you but not olive oil.
Horses are forbidden to eat fire hydrants in Marshalltown, Iowa. I love to know WHY IN THE HELL IS THAT A LAW.
That is a very wacky-minded way of reading it. It's about where to not hitch animals so they don't damage any posts by gnawing on the wood - hydrants would have had wooden posts supporting the line - or by pulling against its hitch. The law: "Do not: Fasten, hitch, or tie any horse or other animal to any fire hydrant, telegraph, telephone, electric light or other pole or to any fence, tree, shrub or other property. Drive, stop, tie or place any horse, or other animal where it may bite, eat or in any way damage any fire hydrant, telegraph, telephone, electric light or other pole or any fence, tree, shrub or other property."
This is what makes news and all social media a horrible source of information, what is stated is true but not complete, like so much information on the internet.
Load More Replies...Do the horses also have to be taught to read so they understand the sign?
I had a horse that would eat some weird stuff (she loved Gatorade and Peeps) but I can't imagine her trying to eat a hydrant. And no, I didn't feed her that junk often. Unfortunately I taught her drink from a bottle/can and seriously regretted it. Because then she started to grab drinks from unsuspecting people just minding their own business. :) Luckily most of them thought it was funny.
...which is true for anything that isn't food. The way the post is written begs several questions: are horses allowed to eat other stuff like cars, traffic lights, or signposts in Marshalltown, Iowa? Why/why not? Do they regularly eat hydrants there (again: why/HOW?) How do you teach the horses to obey the law, as they're notoriously illiterate/rogue? What's the punishment? (@Kira Okah already was kind enough to explain the misleading post, but the text was too obscure to ignore)
Load More Replies...Well, duh. Have you ever tried to put out a fire using a hydrant that has been eaten by a horse?
Horses love to pull on, play with, and fiddle with items. My sister's horse could unlatch a 4 stage bolt. I am betting a horse or two managed to open the hydrant or tear it up
Read about a state in the US when cats are not aloud to meow after 9pm. But that might have changed now. 🙀
Where I used to work they sent round a company wide email (50 odd stores) banning carrier bags from the warehouse because someone slipped on one and broke their leg. She actually broke it because we were roller skating in the warehouse and put slipped on a bag in the accident book because we didn't know what else to say.
Colleague had a slip and fall on a wet floor at work that was not marked, with a witness. She told me about it right after and even though she was 'fine' I suggested she report it. Good thing because she was black and blue by that evening and because we reported it, she was covered to get physical therapy. Document everything!
We have to keep the loading dock doors closed at work because somebody decided it was a short cut. We have a long loading bay where the trucks back all the way inside by a couple truck lengths and some lady tried to drive all the way through. She hit the dock and destroyed her car and the dock plate, which was impressive because its a huge steel plate. So now we have to keep the doors closed no matter how hot it gets.
WOW... I'd be pissed if I had to roast all day because some idiot couldn't spend an extra 45 second driving around
Mfg facility I worked at. Happened to be a woman, on loading dock, backed out of open truck bay, counterweight first into the truck well.
We can leave our dock doors open but there is a safety change in front of them
So, look at the stock photo - imagine that behind it, runnning parallel, is a huge warehouse 'corridor'. Each of those numbered holes is where a huge truck backs up so it can be unloaded into the building. OP is saying that a random idiot tried to drive (from let's say the left side of the picture to the right) through the building, using this corridor. I assume they wanted to get to a road on the opposite side of the building and didn't want to go around. Big surprise, it didn't work.
Load More Replies...
You can't take pictures in the ossuary at Kutna Hora anymore because someone took pictures of themselves kissing and whatever else to the bones.
Ossuary are such a weid concept. "Come in, we used to be what you are and you will be what we are"
That sign is on a lot of old cemeteries too. "Pay our residents the respect they are due. As you are, so were we. As we are, so shall you be"
Load More Replies...Wish they would forbid pictures at Auschwitz. Or at least make you apply for a permit to take pictures to stop the cunty instagrammers Edit for the spelling police because I typed too fast and didn't check 🙄
So you can still kiss the bones but without taking pictures of it. Well okay.
It happened in 2019, so I'm putting the blame on some gd nitwit influencer.
In our theater, we had to make the “no throwing tools” rule. Which you would think that’d be OBVIOUS, but no. Apparently common sense isn’t that common anymore
As well as my plans for a horror movie live rendition...
Load More Replies...I used to work backstage at a children's theatre during high school as a volunteer. During my three years there, rules had to be put in place to "Not play darts with stray nails", "Do not form nooses with stock rope", and "Dry ice is not for making explosives". Our crew manager was creative when he got bored
our robotics lab had two hilarious rules no making projectile weapons and it is forbidden to make explosives for a final project. (The second rule came after one of my classmates received a letter from the FBI and had to talk to the tech department at my school about his search history).
My father owned a construction company, and I simply can't imagine any of his crew being this cavalier.
Climbing on the rail on a cruise ship can get you banned for life.
He's not dead. Just bobbing along waiting for his ban to be lifted so he can get rescued! 🤭
Load More Replies...It's a very common suicide method, and cruise companies really don't want to have liability for suicidal maniacs.
I was on a cruise once when someone went overboard on a different ship. Our ship and another took part in the search (bad weather cancelled our port of call). On the elevator another passenger and I were discussing how you would have to be doing something stupid to fall overboard. Another guy said he disagreed. "I was up on the railing hanging way over to see ahead of the ship. If a big gust of wind came up it would have blown me overboard." I replied, :as I was saying..."
Oh please, let them. We're desperately running out of habitable land. Why are we protecting idiots and influencers?
up vote for wanting to cast influencers over the rail lol
Load More Replies...
An operator in the control room of a power plant was caught sleeping during his shift. The resulting rule was outlawing any napping/sleeping anywhere on site at any time. Not at breaks or lunchtime, at your desk, in your office or in your car in the parking lot at lunch. And to top it off, keep your office door open at all times to show that you’re working at your desk. They could have just said not to sleep in the control room, but that would be singling a person out.
They cannot mandate what you do on your lunch break, nor force you to stay on company premises without a good reason.
Been to facilities with this rule. Easy fix is to park across the street.
Load More Replies...... I don't think companies can dictate what you do on your lunch break. If so, that just sounds inhumane
Not what, but where. You can sleep, just not on company property. Still kinda weird, but not illegal as far as I know, but then again I am not a lawyer so I could be wrong.
Load More Replies...Just like school. Punish everyone because they don't have the ballz to penalize one person.
This is not unfair - the company hasn't even punished the person who could have caused a serious problem if something had gone wrong while they were 'on duty'. Why the hell would anyone be asleep at a power station? The company is mandating that they don't do something they shouldn't have been doing anyway. It's not about the sleeping, it's about what might have happened as a result - like how a pilot and co-pilot CANNOT sleep at the same times, or for very long, no matter how bored they are.
Load More Replies...You can't tell them what to do in their own car if they are not on the clock.
That's just doubly stupid because having a 15-20 minute lunch snooze might prevent such an issue!
If they believed that was the case, they would provide a break room for the purpose. The issue was the person sleeping was supposed to be awake and monitoring a potentially dangerous facility, not that they were asleep at all.
Load More Replies...Like Homer Simpson, he wasn't sleeping, he was just resting his eyes
"Sorting my thougts by colour" is my favourite take on that one (possibly by Garfield)
Load More Replies...it's a little extensive, sure, but sleeping in a power plant could cause a disaster, so it's at least somewhat reasonable.
One rule that stands out is the "no food in the computer lab" policy—thankfully, I wasn’t the one who spilled a soda all over the equipment! Sometimes, one person’s mistake leads to valuable lessons for everyone.
A very sensible policy. I was once presenting a training course and knocked a glass of coke all over my laptop. It didn't like it. I did eventually get it dried out and working again, but it had sticky keys permanently enabled!!
Yep. I had a mug of hot chocolate at my desk. There was a spider. Mayhem occurred and my keyboard was bathed in cocoa when the dust settled. Very glad the head of IT is a friend...and also dislikes spiders.
There is a very common rule that you shouldn't take your sandwiches into a lead smelter either.
As opposed to "leaving sense" which it seems most of the population have now.
Load More Replies...Decades and decades ago, BofA bought new NCR machines for processing the checks. One girl decided to process checks and drink her Coke until she spilled the Coke all over the machine. I understand she bought a $10,000 NCR machine that day.
There is a plausible theory that Turing didn't commit suicide as has been commonly believed but accidentally contaminated the apple he ate daily with cyanide because he was renowned for his messy lab space. I don't know why he was working with cyanide, but apparently he did have it in his lab and having food and cyanide in the same place is not a good idea, especially if you have a reputation for being careless.
I had to order a new keyboard IMMEDIATELY when I hired on as a company controller. The woman who had the job before me was grossly overweight (no haters, it is a medical term) and the keyboard was disgusting. It's no wonder the accounts were in such a state, it looked like all she ever did at her desk was eat. The keyboard was so funky smelling I was surprised no one had thought to get rid of it. Yeah, no food at your desk was one of the first changes I made.
The abolishment of last meal requests in Texas because one guy had such a massive meal request.
Abolished because Lawrence Russell Brewer requested a large and expensive last meal, but did not eat any of it, stating that he was not hungry. Concurrent but significant reason is that at the time the Governor of Texas was Republican Rick Perry, an all-around as**ole, religious nutjob and opponent to basic human rights. He actively fought battles against LGBT rights, freedom of religion, light dr*gs recreational and medical use, human treatment of prisoners, any basic regulations of firearms etc. He is the guy who greenlighted executions for mentally incapable inmates and refused to hold executions for prisoners whose guilt had became dubious from new evidence after the trial, at the same time favoring moving more money to private prisons while lowering living standards for inmates.
Rick Perry is also known for being the "mastermind" ("mind" is used with some liberty here) behind the "Hunter Biden Laptop" conspiracy, with Perry -at the time Trump's secretary of energy- attempting to coerce Ukraine into making up criminal charges against Trump's political opponents , else the Trump administration would have withhold military funds already granted to Ukraine by the Congress.
Load More Replies...That's f*****g b******t. Everyone must suffer because some a*****e screwed it? Yes, yes I know
Unpopular opinion, but my heart doesn't go out to folks on death row not getting their last requested meal. They should be suffering until the end.
Load More Replies...From what I read the size alone wasn't the issue. The issue seemed to be that he then refused to eat it
To me the issue is one overboard request (which could easily have been curbed by the authorities instead of being granted in full) leading to a complete cancellation of privilege to all others. Whether he really lost his appetite (understandable given the circumstances) or refused to eat out of spite (also kinda relatable): the authorities punished *others* for *his* actions. This is not a case of "this is why xyz rule exists", this is lordly spitefulness and despotism.
Load More Replies...Always thought it would be clever to ask for the Chinese delicacy of thousand year old eggs as a last meal. Until I realised they don't take that long to prepare. And that I'd probably be happy to meet my end instead of having to eat one
Dark humour alert...imagine the other death row inmates going "I'm gonna kill that ***"
I used to work for a school district in the cafeteria. We got 10 days of PTO per year.
One year, a coworker decided that she was going to take an 8 day cruise the second to last week of the school year.
The following year? No taking time off except in medical emergencies the last month of school.
American workplace rules are insane, btw. 10 days PTO as a concession they can take away? No buddy, you deserve to have three times that, and PTO use should be mandatory to warrant employees' wellbeing.
Oh dude... you have no idea. There are SO many restrictions on teachers. We are legally not allowed to go on strike during the school day. We are not allowed the 30 minute lunch and two 15 minute breaks because " safety". We are not allowed to use PTO without express approval, creating a lesson plan for our absence, and locating a substitute teacher to cover our classes. If we cannot find a sub, the other teachers will be forced to give up their planning and grading time to cover our classes for no compensation. It goes on and on. This is why we have a massive shortage of teachers.
Load More Replies...She, and the rest of us, deserve to use our PTO in a way that best suits us. Wtf is going on the lunchroom at the end of the year that is so demanding that it's an all-hands-on-deck situation? Ugh!
Multiple field trips, cleaning out freezers, coolers, making up menus with leftovers, inventory, packing up the equipment, deep cleaning...it's hands down the hardest time of the year for us.
Load More Replies...Blaming the lady who wanted a cheaper cruise, but some manager had to have approved it. "Yes you can have time off, you just can't use it when most of you most want to use it". This attitude sucks. I've worked for many companies that stop any time off around Christmas, but it's just lazy management. If they ban it then they don't have to monitor it year to year to check that it gets distributed fairly and the same person isn't always the one who benefits. (These were not industries that had a Christmas rush, btw.)
What does it matter if it's the second to last week, the first week, or any other week? If you have PTO, you get to use it. Surely there was enough staff to cover someone when they're out???
No there isn't. School cafeterias are notoriously short staffed. We can't get regular workers much less subs.
Load More Replies...Oh f**k that noise, PTO is your right if you work a job, and only 10 days??
I work at a school and just FYI for all those saying we get the summer off - we don't. At my school we do get June and July off, but we go back the second or third week of August to get ready for kids. Custodians, secretaries, and other non-teaching staff leave later and come back earlier. We don't get paid for the time off, and that time is spent working second jobs and taking classes at our own expense to keep up with state requirements. We're busy all year round, just not necessarily in an active classroom!
So I'm not sure what you actually consider to be summer time but typically it consists of June, July and August. You said that at the school district that you work for, you have the full months of June and July off, as well as 2-3 weeks off in the month of August. How tf is that not having the summer off? Technically, yes you may be shorted a week or two at the end of August but you still have the majority of the summer off. I understand that you may use that time working another job, seasonally but you still do not have to go to work, as a teacher for almost the entire summer. That is the point many were trying to make, in other comments.
Load More Replies...I am a photographer. One of my new event photography clients gave me a list of instructions that included “Do not photograph close-ups of our employees’s low cut shirts” and I wondered which photographer had done this previously. Yikes.
Reminds me of the UK tory MP Christopher Chope who objected to, and delayed, legislation to make upskirting a criminal offence. He then did the same thing with legislation to tackle female genital mutilation. Didn't stop him from being re-elected though.
And he's got an OBE because the UK political system isn't ruled by old white men at all
Load More Replies...As written, that pretty much makes it impossible to take any picture somebody with a low cut top. This picture of Mariah Carey at an office party started out as 4000 x 6000 pixels (including the white boundary), which is the resolution of a modest camera with a 24 MP sensor, and I downsized it to a modest 800 by 1200. It's obviously not a close up, but at full resolution everything in it is 5 times as big. Untitled-6...286f62.jpg
You know those warnings on hand sanitizer that say “do not drink”?
That is because alcoholic people would drink it or put it in other things for the alcohol content, due to cost.
Well, here in the US, our idiot president presented idiotic ideas for getting rid of covid-19. Chemical injection & ingestion coming from that "stable genius". 🙄
We just had a mandate come down about our dress policy, we wear badge reels and because some idiot at one of the other hospitals had one that was inappropriate- instead of telling them to change it, they changed the policy that we can ONLY wear badges with the system name on it. Never mind that 99.9% of us wear cute, fun, and appropriate ones, we’re all punished because one dips**t displayed their dark humor where patients can see it. They should know the dark humor is for lockers outside of the public view LOL
All these stories blame the "dips**t", but the real A-hole is the manager who overreacts to a single incident.
The A-Hole manager probably got too many complaints from A-hole employees , so had to make an A-hole rule.
Load More Replies...I don't fully understand this one, but it seems perfectly logical that if you're wearing a name badge is should only have your name and possibly job role on it.
The thing that holds the badge, they have retractable ones instead of a lanyard
Load More Replies...
The 'Do Not Put Your Hand Underneath The Lawn Mower When Running'. Some knucklehead back in the 90's wanted to trim his hedges and thought that his lawn mower would do the trick. So he fired it up and was going to lift it up by the deck and lost all of his fingers from the middle knuckle up. He successfully sued Toro Co. for not warning people not to put there body parts by a sharp metal blade spinning at 100's of rpm.
OP is confusing two separate cases. The lawnmower ones dates back to 1986 Mele vs. Turner, when 18 years old Charles Turner was injured while mowing a neighbor's lawn with a Sears Roebuck lawnmower. The mower did not evacuate grass properly and it kept accumulating, at which point Turner started cleaning the edge of the lawnmower with his hands without stopping it. After multiple times, he was injured. The plaintiff was definitely not the smartest tool in the shed (contrary to the mower's blade), but the mower design was effectively dangerous. The case was dismissed because the danger was evident to the plaintiff. Funnily enough, Sears&Roebuck already had a voluntary danger notice on not touching the blade while spinning, but this case made it a common occurrence on such products. .
The case against Toro Co he is referring is Romanik v. Toro Co, related to a 13 years old having a snowblower mangle his hands. You can see the contraption by looking for "Toro Snowhound 20", and see how little concern is put into safety in that design. The company was found liable because the design of the machine was effectively dangerous, with the controls too close to spinning machinery. One aspect of the lawsuit involved the fact that the safety warnings were clearly stated on the manual, but not on the machine itself.
Load More Replies...Also useful to have a warning that the blades continue to spin for a few seconds after the machine is turned off. I've cut many a cable that way.
The issue is allowing such cases. The whole sue culture in the USA is because of it. The rest of the world has a thing called common sense. And we don't try to make money from literally everything like the US does
Back in the 70s when I was a young A&E nurse, some idiot wearing thin tennis shoes had an accident with a lawn mower. I found his severed toes in one of his shoes…
human stupidity is legendary and going by 'Darwinism'. seriously - STOP PROCREATING
My old store manager did this while mowing the lawn drunk. Lost a couple fingers.
I know a country that had full face covering bike helmets banned because shop breakers created a trend of using them to mask their face.
My city just banned masks because the criminals have been using surgical masks to sheild their identity. People with compromised immune systems are not pleased.
Sounds like time for a mass civil disobedience event. And maybe a recall campaign. They serve us, not the other way ‘round.
Load More Replies...What is a "shop breaker"? Euphemism for a robber? Or someone who fills up then runs without paying?
This one isn't really making sense to me because wouldn't the criminals just use something else to mask their face?
Couldn't they just cover their face with something else to commit a crime?
So? Lawmakers should have banned robbery, that would have made as much sense. In the UK, cartoon robbers are always pictured wearing tights (Americans call them stockings or pantyhose) pulled down over their heads to disguise their features. Oddly enough, no ban was issued on a clothing item millions of people wear regularly just because scumbags misuse them. Bike helmets should be treated the same way.
Load More Replies...
Doritos have rounded edges due to some peoples’ insufficient chewing habits.
Even without that, I think they should be round anyway. Putting something with sharp edges inside your mouth is just asking for trouble, really. Accidents do happen.
Great , but take one bite and that Dorito breaks into a whole lot of sharp edged shapes. Just eat with commonsense, folks.
Yeah, it doesn't hold up. Apart from anything else, Doritos dissolve when exposed to saliva - it's going to be pretty hard for them to stay 'sharp' for long.
Load More Replies... How overtime was bid for.
A coworker figured out a way to game the system so he could maximize the available overtime, leading to complaints that there was very little left over for others to sign up for. The rules were changed 4 or 5 times and each time he found a way around the rules. Eventually they just started skipping over every other of his OT requests and put in a maximum number of OT hours someone could work in a calendar month and boy did he cry about that for months that he wasn't getting 20 hours a week of OT.
If other people want those extra shifts and he was preventing them from doing so, then I get it. That said. If he was willing to work 60 hours a week the man is a beast.
This seems the same as why it's frowned upon to "count cards". If someone is clever enough to do it, they should be able to clean house as much as they want.
Where I used to work, overtime was optional, (but always available seasonally) when our sister company bought us out, the rule was now, Everyone was REQUIRED to work a minimum of 5 hours per week overtime. I still don't know how they got away with it. (Oh yeah, they fired all the long time employees and started using AI for customer service... for that extra personal touch. )
This idea of overtime is so foreign to me. Even after reading the comments I don't really understand. I've never been in a company that has a certain number of overtime hours. The only time I'm approved for overtime is when we have had a situation crop up unexpectedly during the shift that had to be followed up then and there (or if we aren't in ratio because we are short staffed- I'm a teacher). It's not something you can plan ahead for.
There was a guy where I worked that tried to hog all of the OT and ended up in the same situation, having to share the OT opportunities with other employees. He tried to file a Labor Board complaint that his monthly take-home pay had been unfairly reduced. He lost, naturally.
i feel bad for this guy. its not his fault the company doesnt pay a livable wage
There was nowhere in the post that there was an issue with a "livable wage". Only that one person was hogging all the OT.
Load More Replies...Lol. Here it would be the exact opposite and no one would want to fill any
Our contract demanded, starting with to last 4 of social security number, a rotation with no more than a 12 hr accumulation. You are always free to refuse(depends on seniority). But high seniority sucking up all the OT was an issue.
At my local KPOT place, you have to verbally order your broth instead of on the tablet because someone managed to order 10 soups at once.
So if someone accidentally order 10 rice that is off the tablet as well? And so on until you scrap the tablet?
So does that mean you can order 10 soups without broth on the tablet, just need to specify verbally you want your soup to be soup with broth not just dry ingredients.
There are a ton of state and federal regulations in the senior living facility business (and it is very much a business, but that's a whole 'nother topic) that are in place and enforced because of "one bad apple." SNFs are scared to use bladder catheters because it may look like they are used for the convenience of staff. Assisted living facilities ban side rails because 2 people out of several million have gotten their heads stuck in them. Psychotropic medications often cannot be used because it may seem like a chemical restraint. There are many other examples. All of these things can be very useful for enhancing quality of life for the residents, but a few "bad apples" have ruined it for everyone.
No side rails? Making people less independent and dependent on walkers and wheelchairs sooner than necessary...that's just sad.
It's more than two people, this post is misleading. A bunch of those bed rails have been recalled because people fell between the rail and mattress and suffocated.
Load More Replies...I had to specifically request side rails on my mother's bed in the nursing home. Because I don't care how low you make that bed...multiple falls from bed-to-floor are STILL bad!
The place I worked at posted instructions on how to go number 2. Because people were squatting on the toilet rim breaking the porcelain and injuring themselves.
Some of the factories I deliver to have high proportion of immigrant workers coming from countries where squat toilets are the norm. These companies do the same thing, whinging that they have to keep replacing the western toilets, but never thinking they could just install some squat toilets to keep everyone happy. Squatting is better for your health, opens your bowels better, but since it's a weird 'foreign' habit it just gets dismissed and the foreign workers are seen as trouble makers or as stupid for not adjusting to western ways.
Why exactly does everyone think the western world has a responsibility to conform to the customs of immigrants, yet that expectation never works in reverse? So if a westerner traveled to some asian country where squat toilets are the norm, and having no experience with them opted to grab a random chair, rip off the seat to put over the squat, thereby pi$$ing and $hitting all over the floor, would you be telling the owners of that establishment "stop whining, spend a bunch of money to cater to that minority of selfish individuals who refuse to adapt and integrate" You can achieve the same "health benefits" of a squat toilet by using a small stool, ya know, like the squatty potty, which is something for YOU to work out. Not for you to repeatedly do something so obviously incorrect that it results in destruction of property.
Load More Replies...We had some workers from Mexico being trained in our shop. Back home they don't flush their toilet paper because of their lousy sewage systems and thought the same applied here. They got real creative where they stuffed the used toilet paper.
That's still common in some poor rural southern places. We were told to do that at my aunt's house.
Load More Replies...This is a common problem when you have sit toilets in a place where 'squat' toilets are common.
I stayed at a hotel where the ‘house rules’ included ‘No ATVs in Lobby’!
I've seen a few places in California, and Hawaii and Virginia where that sign would not be unusual. Every place has their idiots. They don't all gather in a specific village anymore. They like to spread out and explore their options. I should know, I'm originally from Florida.
Load More Replies...Remote jobs requiring clocking out for every single step away from the keyboard. Even if it's 1 min to refill coffee or grab water. Takes longer to log out and back in than I would have been gone.
Is this because of previous cases of lazy employees, or is this the consequence of neurotic and paranoid micromanagers getting their way, though?
It's probably some of both. In my opinion it shouldn't be necessary, since a good manager should be able to judge the work output of the employees to determine if he or she is slacking off, and taking the appropriate steps when necessary.
Load More Replies...Some remote jobs require actual spyware placed on the computer - like keyloggers, mouse trackers, and webcam trackers. Read over some of the WFH stuff during the lockdowns, honest to goodness spyware, some even being taken from nefarious sources, security nightmare. Same with some of the schoolkid's school computers - the ones that took images of what was seen by the webcam, with the webcams able to be remotely turned on at any time.
Yeah, the school thing doesn't tend to happen around here, because back in 2010, one of the local school districts had to pay out a $600K settlement for secretly spying on students with the webcams. They claimed they weren't spying, and they only used it to 'look for lost or stolen laptops,' but everyone found out about it in the first place because they tried to discipline a student for 'inappropriate behavior' with a picture from his camera as evidence - they said he was 'handling pills,' which turned out to be Mike & Ike's candy.
Load More Replies...We had to send a daily list of priorities, log the amount of time spent on each, and then send a daily wrap up of what we did. I took quite a vindictive pleasure in logging every single minute of my work day. Within a week, it was decided a general overview would be fine.
Probably originated because someone clocked in, got whatever they needed done in the first hour, and then just walked out of the house to go shopping or something. Likely only got discovered when a manager tried to contact them to ask them something, and realized that the person wasn't at their desk.
But if you are working remotely -- how would they know if you stepped away for 2 minutes?
My old job banned headphones/earbuds for anyone who worked on the warehouse floor, because some moron had both earbuds in and walked in front of a forklift without looking.
I had a cubicle job inside the warehouse and the ban still applied to us. A few of us argued with management and they said they had to make it "fair" for everyone. It was the last straw after lots of s****y treatment (like remodeling the building and removing the windows for weeks in the dead of winter) so I peaced out.
Not using earbuds and headphones on the shop floor is the basic minimum in mandatory workplace safety. You need to hear alarms, machinery malfunctions and other people calls. The fact it was not banned BEFORE an accident is mind boggling. And yes, it applies to cubicle jobs too because warehouses are considered a high risk environment -especially for fires- so you must be in a condition to hear an evacuation order or fire alarm.
Not to mention its really annoying to have to scream at people or track them down while calling for them when they can't hear anything you are saying. I work with a guy who will do this, he is a great dude and does work hard but after 8 hours of repeating myself 3-4 times every time we need to communicate, I've had about enough. Not to mention, we work with a lot of heavy materials and someone could get pinned to a wall or slowly crushed by something and he wouldn't hear them.
Load More Replies...I work in a factory that produces the largest commercial aircraft made in America. For at least 5 years, it has been company policy to ALLOW noise cancelling ear buds as acceptable PPE. I drive forklifts, assist with crane moves of aircraft, cut metal, etc all while the workforce wanders around listening to Netfix. The company is currently hemorrhaging money, 33K employees are out on strike, and this ear bud thing just seems like one more backwards step in the system. It blows my mind, actually. But offices have different rules, as do non-manufacturing spaces.
Pretty much any industrial environment requires you to have your ears open for. If there are forklifts than you are safer if you hear them coming.
yep... thats why i wear one. And when im alone, i just put my music on speaker.
Sorry, but this time the employer was right. Yeah, the person should have been looking, but allowing headphones is a disaster waiting to happen (again).
I know a guy who got music removed from the worksite at an industrial laundry. He fell into a dryer the size of a mobile home and it was hard to hear him screaming WAAooo WAAooo as he went around and around. Dislocated shoulder was the injury.
We nearly have to dynamite our way into a bottle of Motrin. All because some m**********r thought it would be a good idea to poison a few Tylenol bottles in 1982.
He actually tried to poison his wife and placed tampered product on the store shelf to try and hide his culpability. Edit: I was thinking of another case. Here is the one the OP is referencing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Tylenol_murders
It's funny so many products changed their food packaging, but sugar & flour still uses paper.
Probably because it would be pretty hard to tamper with them, and then reclose them without it being obvious that they’d been opened.
Load More Replies...In South Africa in the '90s they started putting plastic seals over bottles of tomato sauce (ketchup) etc. because people were opening them, sticking their fingers in and licking them so see what they tasted like. (Spoiler: They tasted like tomato sauce.)
I lived in that area when it happened - They took all acetaminophen off the shelves, no matter the brand. They needed to make sure of the place of purchase was limited to a few stores. This led to the insane amount of safety seals that are on it.
I had to read this three times to understand what OP was saying. Could have said it differently. But I agree. What I do is take a object with a sharp point and jab the top. Then I can take my finger or finger nail and tear the top off.
Thankfully in the USA Motrin (Ibuprofen) is easy to get over the counter and normal push and twist or line up the arrows to open. Thought the Tylenol ( Acetaminophen) thing happened in the USA but I guess my memory is not so good. Now Sudafed in a lot of places has to be requested from behind the counter because of being used to make other d***s.
I think they might also be referring to the sealed layer after you take the cap off.
Load More Replies...I remember that. My parents had to convince me I could still take my Flintstones vitamins.
One guy poisons his kids Halloween candy, now every parent has to confiscate their kids Halloween candy and go through it for razor blades that aren’t there .
While I understand and support why parents need to check the Halloween candy, my child self was quick to notice, and be annoyed, that my father would routinely find something wrong with my Reese's PB Cups, which were my favorite. And his
Worked out well for the candy companies - now parents won't let kids accept home made products/produce at all.
It did. Once. But it was a father poisoning his own kid with a laced Pixy Stick. Ronald Clark O'Bryan was convicted of murdering his 8 year old in 1974 to collect life insurance money.
Load More Replies...Not just razor blades. Now we have to check for edibles that look like regular gummies/fruit snacks.
This is more of an overreaction to a hoax than a bad apple. Parents confiscate the treats for a variety of reasons, including allergic reactions, redistribution of candy and even because they don't want to clean up rainbow-colored barf because the kid overdosed themselves
This reminds me of the panic over people giving out their gummies. Did that ever really happen? Because I can't imagine paying for gummies just to hand them out to kids for a lark.
The "Not suitable for flying" label on Halloween Superman costumes.
Work: don't wear ragged jeans and a boob tube to a board meeting.
You're the OT gal from above who kept gaming the new OT rules huh 😆
Load More Replies...As a waitress as a café, we can wear any type of black pants we want. It worked fine, as usually people have some type of slacks or black jeans, but let's just say that later it received a few specifications. Like no joggers, no yoga pants, no overly-ripped ones or ones that are basically shorts.
Flash photography in museums because someone damaged artwork with their camera flash.
I really think it should be completely banned. I want to appreciate the artwork. This is sad
The flash or the photo part? I wanna ban the dumb tomato soup throwers..
Load More Replies...I doubt it's a single someone, more like the constant flashing of hundreds or thousands of cameras per day. Some pigments are light sensitive and the flashing can trigger chemical reactions destroying them. As a bonus it annoys the other visitors.
Load More Replies...Also, never photograph a mouse to near with a flash. It can destroy their whiskers.
Maybe I'm not understanding this post, but I don't think this was necessarily caused by stupid people. If you know nothing about art how would you know a simple flash of light would damage it over time? Sounds like this was more a rule that came about as we learned what damage it was doing to photograph something with a flash. Like how we learned not to use lead in paint, or asbestos in insulation.
I HATE flash photography. At my son's last youth symphony, an oblivious Boomer was just standing in the box seats, lighting up the whole venue. Maybe he had dementia, maybe I need to find compassion, or maybe someone just needed to slap that camera out of his old, spotty hands. I dunno, but I have found my rage for the day. Thanks, BP!
I think there's an actual issue with the amount of light emitted by flashes, as many museum exhibits are carefully lit. But it could be worse. A few years ago I was in a sacred cave in Belize, where ancient burials took place, etc., and there was no photography allowed at all. Why? Because some time before a tourist trying to photograph a pot fell into it and smashed it.
Oh I have a good one. Worked at an aircraft manufacturer that's well known in the pacific Northwest part of USA. there is a sealant used that is flash frozen, so needs to be thawed at room temperature. In the specs it literally says you cant microwave the sealant because a guy absolutely destroyed a microwave AND sealant by doing just that. This stuff stains and is incredibly hard to remove from hair/skin. .
Can't recall the name of the sealant but used it during my time in the Navy. We would usually run water over it in the sink to thaw
This seems like they were negligent in not making that clear in the first place. The guy was showing initiative - hope he was OK.
Aircraft manufacturing is not a context where you “show initiative” or improvise. You follow every work instruction and procedure to the letter.
Load More Replies...
When you buy a car most dealers have a tire chain disclosure informing you to check your owners manual to see what kind of chains or traction devices your vehicle takes. This is due to someone in the 90’s putting the wrong kind on their car and suing the dealer into the oblivion. Literally 1000’s of forms from one lawsuit.
They ask you to sign the waiver because it's a requirement from a poorly worded California Vehicle Code article (§ 11713.6). The law requires the seller to openly disclose if a vehicle is prohibited to safely operate while using snow chains, and is required to use different equipment to avoid damage to the road or the vehicle itself. The "suing the dealer into the oblivion" is b******t.
I often feel that a good portion of lawsuits in the US are just "I did something incredibly stupid (like micorwave my hamster) because noone specifically told me I shouldn't do that. Now I'm entitled to 283475601284360 USD" In most other countries these law suits wouldn't even go before a judge.
IT honestly is not like that though. After the McDOnald's hot coffee case, where the victim suffered third degree burns requiring skin grafts (all this after having received multiple indications that their coffee was too hot) There was a general marketing effort to cast her as the kind of person you are talking about. That led to large companies pushing for Tort Reform (limiting jury verdicts for laibility) by basically spreading the idea that most of these lawsuits are nuisance suits. In fact product liability and premises liability are well trod areas of the law and it is actually pretty hard to win a case against the business if you were the stupid one. But it is easy to FILE a case so your best business practice is to use as many discalaimers and waivers as you can think of to make dismissing the occasional nuisance law suit easier
Load More Replies...Here is another example of why location for so many posts should be required. I have lived in many US states and a few other countries. In US as an adult lived in Maine, had three different cars one I bought there never heard of this.
It refers to a specific California regulation, and even at that it's a BS entry.
Load More Replies...Yeah we don't have that here in Louisiana lol we rarely get ice or snow especially ice or snow that requires chains on the tires.
At my work we can't take a powered pallet jack out on the sales floor without an escort because somebody somewhere else in the company hit someone. Certainly lugging around a one+ ton pallet with a manual jack that needs at least a few feet to stop with people who don't look where they're going because they're glued to their phones at all times is so much safer.
This is one instance of someone attributing sensibly designed safety procedures to "somebody somewhere hitting someone". No buddy, there are people whose job is PREVENTING accidents and if you move heavy loads in public cordoning off the area and having a spotter are an obvious advice (if not mandatory, depending on where you are)
Never use mobile equipment with an obstructed view without a spotter.
Load More Replies... In the UK there aren’t power outlets in bathrooms.
Which means you have to dry your hair with your dryer plugged in the corridor or something. Because of some idiot.
The vast majority of people in the UK do not dry their hair in a corridor; they do it in their bedroom. Certain types of power outlets are allowed in bathrooms. These are suitable for electric toothbrushes and electric shavers. If you have a huge bathroom, you can install regular power outlets, but they must be a good distance away from water sources.
Not true there has NEVER been power sockets in UK bathrooms, this is due to safety and building regs in the Uk. And funnily enough we mange very well without power sockets in the bathrooms.
They are allowed, but there is a minimum mandated distance from power outlets to faucets. UK building code mandates 3 meters from the edge of any bathub or shower, while most of Europe mandates just 60 cm to 1 meter (that is PLENTY to warrant safety when paired with minimum safety equipment on the panel). UK electrical codes are vastly outdated, and suffer from some very shoddy practices common in the 40s and 50s that would require massive investments to update existing buildings to sensible regulations, so they decided against doing it...
It amuses me that the UK distance from power outlet to faucet doesn't apply in the kitchen.
Load More Replies...What about that modern wonder we call a GFI? A Ground fault interrupt outlet? Automatically faults the connection to prevent electrocution. Used in kitchens and bathrooms everywhere.
Yes, in Finland we usually have these. In some older homes where there isn't the outlets are usually covered with a flap that prevents any water getting in.
Load More Replies...If you think 'some idiot' was the reason for this sensible rule then you don't seem like the brightest spark yourself.
Same in South Africa. People go, "How do you dry your hair?" Um, in front of the dressing table with a mirror, in my bedroom?
Don't put Animals in microwaves after a lady gave her cat a bath and then tried to dry him in the microwave. She sued and won because there was no warning then.
This is an urban legend that pre-dates microwaves to being about drying the cat on a wood stove. The nearest thing that I can find that actually happened irl is someone who purposely murdered a kitten this way, she was imprisoned for the crime.
'This one smells nice" "which one?" "Mmm, smells like mother's crazy sister, Kate" "oh you think so?" "yeah, I do" "It smells so good! She couldn't've been that crazy, I don't think so" "Oh, you don't think so, huh?" "No" "Well, she put her poodle one time in a microwave oven!" "To eat it?" "Yeah" "To... eat it?!" "Oh, no No, no, no, no, no, no, no" Silly! To dry it! But, it exploded! And they were both found dead" "she must have been out of her head!" Perfume counter from Possibly In Michigan
It is still illegal to carry a Salmon in a suspicious way along a high street in England. I assume along the back roads, it's fine? x
What if I carry the salmon in a non suspicious way along a high street. That's ok I suppose.
Load More Replies...I once lived in an apartment building where the rules very explicitly stated that we weren't allowed to shoot pigeons from the balcony with neither a bow and arrow not an air rifle. I guess a semi automatic would be fine.
In our school's diary, in the list of rules it states no smoking. Obviously - it's a primary school! I think the oldest kid we've ever had in Grade 7 was 14. So when kids were caught with vaping equipment, one parent got a lawyer who threatened to sue the school because vaping isn't mentioned in the diary. Every year we have to keep adding things that are prohibited because kids, their parents and lawyers look for loopholes to excuse their sh!tty behaviour.
I was 5 and my brother was 7 when we were busted for smoking - we smoked in combine hoppers, coal sheds, anywhere out of public view; we both had tonsillectomies shortly there after. Gerry did not start up again until he was 14, I did not start again until I was 19 (I quit when I was 40). The secret was that our dad bought his cigarettes by the carton from a local Native American res and stored them in the freezer - he quit smoking after we were caught *Edit: I mention the tonsillectomies b/c we think that is part of how we quit - we had been smoking for about a year by then
Load More Replies...I don't know about the "because of stupid people" part, but there's a great book-- "You May Not Tie an Alligator to a Fire Hydrant"--that looks at some truly bizarre rules in the US. https://shorturl.at/GcuiS
I hope that it actually explains them all in actual context, because these "wacky law" things are rarely actually wacky, just really badly out of context or in legalese that when cleared up makes perfect sense.
Load More Replies...Our building instituted a "no microwaved popcorn" rule because people would frequently walk away from the microwave and severely burn their popcorn which would set off the fire alarms. There was also a "no balloons" policy because someone once lost control of a balloon bouquet that went high up in the lobby and lodged in the air system. That time, it set off the fire alarm and caused 7 floors of the building to evacuate.
i once worked for a cleaning company that had to send letters to everyone that it was not allowed to wear high heels to work.....
Worked at a place where the restrooms had signs up forbidding the washing of feet in toilets.
It is still illegal to carry a Salmon in a suspicious way along a high street in England. I assume along the back roads, it's fine? x
What if I carry the salmon in a non suspicious way along a high street. That's ok I suppose.
Load More Replies...I once lived in an apartment building where the rules very explicitly stated that we weren't allowed to shoot pigeons from the balcony with neither a bow and arrow not an air rifle. I guess a semi automatic would be fine.
In our school's diary, in the list of rules it states no smoking. Obviously - it's a primary school! I think the oldest kid we've ever had in Grade 7 was 14. So when kids were caught with vaping equipment, one parent got a lawyer who threatened to sue the school because vaping isn't mentioned in the diary. Every year we have to keep adding things that are prohibited because kids, their parents and lawyers look for loopholes to excuse their sh!tty behaviour.
I was 5 and my brother was 7 when we were busted for smoking - we smoked in combine hoppers, coal sheds, anywhere out of public view; we both had tonsillectomies shortly there after. Gerry did not start up again until he was 14, I did not start again until I was 19 (I quit when I was 40). The secret was that our dad bought his cigarettes by the carton from a local Native American res and stored them in the freezer - he quit smoking after we were caught *Edit: I mention the tonsillectomies b/c we think that is part of how we quit - we had been smoking for about a year by then
Load More Replies...I don't know about the "because of stupid people" part, but there's a great book-- "You May Not Tie an Alligator to a Fire Hydrant"--that looks at some truly bizarre rules in the US. https://shorturl.at/GcuiS
I hope that it actually explains them all in actual context, because these "wacky law" things are rarely actually wacky, just really badly out of context or in legalese that when cleared up makes perfect sense.
Load More Replies...Our building instituted a "no microwaved popcorn" rule because people would frequently walk away from the microwave and severely burn their popcorn which would set off the fire alarms. There was also a "no balloons" policy because someone once lost control of a balloon bouquet that went high up in the lobby and lodged in the air system. That time, it set off the fire alarm and caused 7 floors of the building to evacuate.
i once worked for a cleaning company that had to send letters to everyone that it was not allowed to wear high heels to work.....
Worked at a place where the restrooms had signs up forbidding the washing of feet in toilets.
