30 Things Hailed As “The Next Big Thing” That Ended Up Being Total Flops Instead
With technological innovations seemingly breaking the speed of sound, it’s easy to believe that we’re always on the verge of revolutionary breakthroughs. The hype machine tells us that thing X or Y is going to “change the game”, and, most of the time, many of us fall for it, especially at the early-adopter end of the bell curve.
Someone asked an online community, “What was supposed to be ‘The Next Big Thing’ but totally flopped?” and netizens didn’t hold back with their answers. From NFTs to Cybertrucks, here’s a collection of some of our favorites.
More info: Reddit
This post may include affiliate links.
Cyber truck.
WeeklyMath9 reply:
They’re just so ugly. I always felt like the design team stopped like 25% in and said “we’re done”
That's because she has boobs, let's be real. If you (general you, not you specifically) gave the Cybertruck boobs, I'm sure it'd be more popular (amongst bogans or whatever the US equivalent is, anyway 😂).
Load More Replies...They’re not ugly trucks, they’re FUGLY ROLLING DUMPSTERS. Bet they end up rusting out a lot when they get older or dented—-how does road salt affect them?
No one's going to use one of those to go back to the future.
Load More Replies...This is what a vehicle would look like if you had to put it together at home with day-to-day tools...see example, Geof from Top Gear.
Segway.
vikki_1996 reply:
SNL news once discussed the Segway launch by saying ‘this amazing invention is going to revolutionize…the way people get hit by cars.’
Upvote for knowing the proper use of the word segue, and how to spell it!
Load More Replies...My boss had a Segway and it was fun to play with. It took him about a week to stop looking dorky when riding it. The key was something about his posture, bending at the knees a bit and leaning forward to imply motion.
Not the inventor, but the guy who bought the company from him.
Load More Replies...I used one on a tourist tour and loved it. However, it was a large city in Spain and largely pedestrianised.
I vaguely remember this. There was so much hype. People predicted that this new invention was going to revolutionize everything - how we travel, design our cities, etc. And then we saw it. But it did give us not one, but two Paul Blart movies!
I remember the buildup to these. No description, just that whatever it was it was going to be revolutionary. I also remember the wtf? look on reporters faces when they were revealed.
Well now we have people on scooters, electric bikes, hover boards, uni-balls, garbanzo beans, whatever. I don't know what any of them are called. They're legion and all over the place and I have to dodge at least one or the other going 35mph on a city sidewalk on a daily basis. The desire to clothesline one of the bastards gets more tempting every day.
NFTs.
Capt_Rons_Lost_Eye reply:
I still don't understand the purpose of them
The food I cook is fungible because I can add mushrooms to it.
Load More Replies...NFTs were portable black holes for the wealthy to hide money. When it's time to sell, you determine its sale price, depending on whether you want to make or lose money.
It's a way to sell a "star" as many times as you want by giving it a unique number and selling the numbers. Great for money laundering and making people feel special.
They can hold election votes, for example as to 1 citizen 1 nft to vote. Art in NFTs is just one use case
Every few years, the world gets swept up in hype over something promised to be revolutionary. Whether it’s tech, fashion, food, or entertainment, anticipation builds, headlines scream, and investors salivate. Sometimes, however, the glittering future turns out to be fool’s gold, leaving us all wondering how we got so easily convinced.
Remember Google Glass? Tech media hailed it as the dawn of wearable computing, a sleek visor for the sci-fi generation. Instead, the device became a punchline. Privacy concerns, awkward design, and a sky-high price tag meant only geeks wore them. The dream of seamless augmented reality collapsed before our very... eyes.
Facebook's MetaVerse.
prettythings87 reply:
Yes LOL I still think about the lame thumbnails they released to show what it looked like
Zuck has read/watched Ready Player One, then tried and failed to create OASIS.
Y2K.
peternormal reply:
Y2k might have been the last time we listened to scientists as a society.
It happened, and it would have been bad, but we knew it was going to happen and put resources into fixing it ahead of time.
As someone who worked in banking software at the time. It was a big big deal, the fact that nothing happened was a testament to executives and the government actually believing computer scientists and spending money to fix the issue.
It was a great example of what happens when people do actually listen to experts and act accordingly. Sure, there was never any real risk to home computer users, but there were very many big systems used, for example in banking, that posed genuine risk of failure if they were not properly validated or updated.
Looks like peternormal flunked science too many times, and since he doesn’t understand it, he’s decided to rail against it and call it stupid. Says a lot about him, doesn’t it?
His phrasing could use some help but I think he's speaking positively about the "scientists," saying Y2K was indeed a big deal, but we felt little to no negative effects because so many believed the "computer scientists and (spent) money to fix the issue."
Load More Replies...That's when this shi//ing on science started. Just because the people fixing it were so good that most of us noticed nothing, some idiots thought that was proof that it was false alarm. And then a lot of other idiots who weren't even out of their nappies when it happened decided to believe the first id/ots.
It's not like we were caught off guard by it. Updates to handle Y2K had been ongoing for a while, that's why when it came, any issues that may have occurred were mild.
We were well aware of the Y2K issue when I started in programming in the early 80s. Every piece of code we wrote had to be written to work around the issue. Lots and lots of people fixing legacy code over more than a decade made it a non-event. My favorite Y2K story, however was when they interviewed the sr. engineer at a small dam and power plant near us. He said "I'm not worried about it. It's not going to have any impact on us at all... there are no computers in this entire installation. It's all still running on the original 1930s equipment!"
AI. Mark my words.
Tech companies are already tempering expectations.
wagwa2001l reply:
AI shares a lot in common with Flat Earthers - it doesn’t have the ability to distinguish good information from bad and so mostly just regurgitates garbage that confuses some people into thinking it’s intelligent.
The concept of AI is one of those things that sounds good on paper, but will take decades, maybe even a century, to perfect in reality—-only the greedy a******s who own AI companies are pushing it to be everywhere LONG before it’s actually ready, and that is dangerous. Already dangerous, tbh, as the lazy are using it in place of their own learning and thinking. I am far from a being a Luddite, but I really don’t want AI in my home or business until at least most of the bugs are worked out. I’m 64, so probably won’t live to see that day arrive.
One of the AI platforms that absorbs info on its own from the internet became a racist hate spouting application. Just like most of the humans using the internet. Garbage in = garbage out.
Government and defence uses are lapping AI up. It might be useless in the version WE see but the advanced AI that government uses seems to be working..
El Dee, do a search for PALANTIR. There’s an interesting video on YT by Vanessa Wingårdh about its global surveillance network.
Load More Replies...I'm sorry, but people who think they are able to think say what wagwa2001l says. I don't know where to begin when it comes to chatgpt alone, helping with practical stuff and doing research that has lead to so many good things in my life.
We cannot trust artificial intelligence until we can properly deal with natural stupidity.
Can ai put up shelves or paint your walls? So what use is it?
In the late 2000s, 3D televisions were going to revolutionize living rooms. Studios raced to release 3D versions of blockbusters, electronics stores filled with bulky glasses, and marketers promised depth like never before. Reality? Headaches, clunky eyewear, limited content, and inflated costs. By the mid-2010s, companies quietly abandoned the gimmick as Netflix bingeing dominated instead.
Let’s not forget the Segway. Launched with grand secrecy and Steve Jobs-level hype, it was supposed to change cities forever. Instead of futuristic metropolises filled with self-balancing scooters, Segways mostly found homes in mall security patrols and tourist groups. Expensive, impractical, and uncool, it became proof that not every invention reshapes human mobility.
As an American I was told we would be switching over to the metric system when I was growing up in the seventies. Never did see that really happen.
And now they think it's the better one. It's not, all the good countries use metric
To be successful, it has to be all or nothing, and embrace the motto "think metric", not try to convert from older measures. I remember in Australia when we transitioned in the early 70s there was still a lot of residual literal translation (e.g. advice columns saying "dissolve 454g of washing soda in a bucket of water...") but once people started thinking in terms of 500g, 100m and other round numbers, and goods were packaged that way, I think the conversion went smoother. You will never progress if you retain old measures and label things as "X milliliters (Y fluid ounces)"
I was in 6th grade when they tried to switch to the metric system. Even at 12 years old, my thought was, "It's hard to imagine them doing a worse job."
Cowboys refused to trade their ten-gallon hats in for 37.85411784 liter hats.
It's about time America got in line with the majority of the world.
And we all regret that everytime we have to google how many ounces are in a gallon or how many feet are in a mile.
Only USA and a few other 3rd world countries do not use metric. Just because YOU failed to make the switch does not make it a "flop".
Google+ was supposed to be facebook big rival.
BituminousBitumin reply:
It couls have been if Google hadn't fumbled so hard. It came about at a time when Facebook was making some very unpopular changes. The platform was actually really good.
Yeah, it was a pretty good site, something like Tumblr lite, and I've met some interesting people there.
Anyone remembers RWJ messing with the G+ every episode of =3?....no? Gosh I'm old.
Windows phone.
Rikers-Mailbox reply:
Had one, loved it. I was so disappointed that MSFT whiffed the smartphone afte being the leader for so long.
And I loved the way all the icons were square and the layout of the screen. I keep looking for a skin to change my Android to at least look more like the Windows phone ...
That was M$ attempt to beat apple putting all their devices to the same user experience at the time of windows8, same interface for tablets and server os. The idea failed miserably and moved over ending nokia business. You just do not create a standard instantly at the push of a button. They bought Nokia and reportedly tried to buy the first 100 apps for it thinking we're Microsoft we'll make it working. They didn't.
I had one. It was an HTC and the damned thing would overheat and shut off. Start it up, 4 or 5 hours, the battery got hot and shut off again. I went through 5 of them in 11 months (there was a 2 year warranty on them) but AT&T finally cut me off saying there was no way in hell 5 could be bad. Turned out they were. (I still have a dead one on my desk!) I had a year left on my contract with a dead phone and they wouldn't replace it. Not even with a different unit! I had to buy a phone off eBay.
Windows Phone was actually pretty awesome and so were the phones that ran it, but it just didn't get the level of app support that iOS and Android got and that put it at a huge disadvantage.
I owned two and loved them. The OS was so intuitive, but it came to the market too late, and no one wanted another ecosystem to develop apps for. A real shame.
When it comes to food, trends can burn out fast. Cronuts, the croissant-doughnut hybrid, had lines around the block in New York. Copycats popped up worldwide, and Instagram fueled the frenzy, but after the sugar rush faded, so did the obsession. Cronuts still exist, sure, but they’re more quirky pastry than cultural revolution now.
In fashion, Google’s Jacquard smart jacket promised to merge clothing with connectivity. Tap your sleeve, change your music. Swipe, and get navigation cues. It sounded futuristic but turned out clunky, overpriced, and pointless when you already had a smartphone in your pocket. It quietly disappeared, another reminder that not all “wearables” are, in fact, wearable.
Countries coming together to combat climate change.
We want to mitigate climate change, but the people who own the biggest polluting businesses don’t. They don’t realize their money won’t protect and buy them, or their children, resources that don’t exist anymore.
Can't fight the 0.1% if they're funding the people we want to lead the fight for it.
The blame for this can be laid at the door of capitalism. "Iff it is going to cost money then it is someone else's problem "
Trump thinks that if you have solar power, you have no electricity when the sun goes down. Or if you use wind power, the power stops as soon as the wind dies. The White House even tweeted this out. Trump's supporters are so ridiculously stupid, they can't wrap their tiny minds around the concept of stored energy.
Russell Brand. When that dude hit the States he was shoved down our throats from all angles. Good to see he failed.
Lets not forget he is going on trial next year for r**e and sexual a*****t.
I hate Russell Brand, I have never found him funny and refuse to watch anything with him in it. My girls love the movie, "Hop" and it drives me insane that he voices E.B.
He is a repulsive s*x pest. I recall seeing him when he first started in the UK, he made me feel physically sick the way he spoke about women.
3D tv.
dayofthedead204 reply:
Im still disappointed this didn't take off.
I still have 3D Blu Rays and a 3D Projector home theatre at home - and Jurassic Park kicks a*s in 3D. It's basically the only way you can watch 3D movies at home (unless I'm mistaken). And the only way you can watch a 3D movie is when it's in theatres.
Which is kinda disappointing.
I can't see the 3-D effect. I can't be the only one. It looks less realistic than the 2-D version..
It doesn't work with glasses. It was either I can't see the movie or I can't see in 3d. I made my choice, I am probably not the only one.
Idk but I never really got into it. I always went to see the non-3D version instead, it always felt a bit too distracting for me...maybe also since I'm not used to glasses the frames felt limiting.
Again, useless for those of us who wear high prescription glasses. The 3D glasses never fit over my glasses and make me so nauseous all I can think about is that, not seeing whatever it is in 3D.
3D-video ble ikke en vedvarende suksess hovedsakelig fordi kinogjengere mistet interessen etter at omsetningen for 3D-filmer stupte fra 2016 til 2018, samt at teknologien krevde spesielle briller og var dyrere å produsere, noe som reduserte tilgangen til filmer og opplevd verdi for forbrukerne.
It really was a fad, huh. I used to sell TVs (worked at an electronics retailer. So many people wanted them at the time.) 3D gave me a headache, personally. My previous TV was 3D but I never used it. And now you just can't find it anywhere, even though you can still buy DVDs/blurays that cater to it.
IMHO the main problem in adoption of home 3D TVs was pushing the active 3D technology. The principle of active technology was that the glasses was changing opacity for each eye to show appropriate image to each eye. The result was that you needed heavy, battery-powered, rapidly blinking glasses for each person who is watching the TV, and it was horrible when there were any ambient light, as you could clearly see the blinking. The glasses were expensive, uncomfortable and the whole thing was stupid AF. Passive glasses are cheap, polarized, nothing is blinking and the only disadvantage is it has half of (either horizontal or vertical) resolution. It is comfortable and pretty good to watch (the same technology is used in movies, but the resolution division is mitigated by using two polarized projectors at once), but the active technology was so bad it killed the whole 3D market.
The risk of being an early adopter is paying a huge amount of money for something that at best will be quite a bit cheaper in a few years and at worst will not take off at all and be a complete waste of money. dayofthedead204 went all-in on something that, at best, people were lukewarm on at the time.
The gaming industry has also had its fair share of flops. The Ouya console arrived on Kickstarter with massive fanfare: a tiny, affordable device to disrupt the giants. Backers celebrated. Reality? Weak hardware, bad games, and no reason to ditch PlayStation or Xbox. It just became another notorious example of hype crashing hard.
Even transportation gets swept into hype cycles. Hyperloop, Elon Musk’s high-speed vacuum train, was once sold as the future of travel. Yet years later, billions of dollars have been spent with little to show. Safety issues, cost overruns, and physics itself conspired against it. Today, Hyperloop feels less like tomorrow and more like vaporware.
Self driving Teslas
Autonomous cars. As Dave Barry says "What could possibly go wrong?"
Virtual reality, like two or three times.
LordsOfFrenziedFlame reply:
I wouldn't say it flopped. It comes in waves, with each wave bringing progress
It comes in waves, each wave bringing a new type of nausea. Like many or most, mine now occupies a drawer full time.
The problem is that reality does not look like the same photo every day. VR is a wow for a few days and then becomes boring.
Load More Replies...Useless for those of us who need high prescription glasses. Why would I buy or buy in to something I can't ever use?
Virtual reality kind of reminds me of all the hype there used to be about 3D movies. Just like VR, it got a little better each time but never quite hit it out of the park. I've seen a few people try VR out at what passes for arcades these days, and they've all walked away disappointed.
I have yet to feel compelled to get a VR headset. I think VR will remain just something niche. It will never be a big thing.
Betamax.
co0p3r reply:
Betamax flopped commercially but became the standard for professional use and had a very good run.
Betamax had a licensing fee, VHS didn't. It wasn't because the pron industry adopted it. Like everyone else, the pron industry adopted it because it was free.
Load More Replies...Betamax wanted to keep royalty fees in place, so everyone went the lower quality, but free option.
Load More Replies...Betamax ble en flopp fordi VHS vant i det som ble kalt formatkrigen. Selv om Betamax hadde teknologiske fordeler som bedre bildekvalitet, ble VHS populær fordi flere selskaper støttet formatet, båndene hadde lengre opptakstid (opprinnelig), og det ble et dominerende format i leiefilmmarkedet, noe som førte til større utvalg av filmer på VHS.
I still have about 200 HD-DVDs, 2 desktop players, 4 computer drives and 2 USB recorders with about 20 blanks! They just sit around.
Load More Replies...Hype isn’t always bad. It demonstrates our hunger for progress and imagination made real. However, these disasters remind us that not every shiny promise becomes reality. Some inventions stumble, some trends fade, and some are just ahead of their time. Either way, the “next big thing” is always waiting around the corner... until it isn’t.
What do you think of the famous flops in this list? Upvote your favorites and let us know if you’ve ever shelled out top dollar for something that didn’t turn out to be all that!
Google glass.
kytheon reply:
Tried it, hated it. The idea is great, the e*******n was so bad that nobody else tried ever since.
These days META-Rayban glasses have caused fights for the same reason Glassholes did then: people don't like the idea that they're being filmed without consent. As if Zuckerberg ever cared about privacy, or about anyone but himself and Trump.
Olean was supposed to be the future of healthy potato chips.
Training-Athlete4348 reply:
I loved when they added the warning "do not assume it is gas".
Olean - This will go through you like shitt through a goose! Customers - OMG, this goes through you like shitt through a goose!
Minidisk.
BlacksmithInformal80 reply:
Early 90’s my uncle took me out with him to rent some CDs (yeah you could rent CDs), and he pointed to some stand and said “those are the wave of the future. They’ll replace CDs in a few years”. They were mini disk. The first last and only time I had ever heard of them.
I still have my 2 units! And a load of disks that have live recordings on them.
Her er hovedårsakene til at MiniDisc ikke ble en suksess: Dårlig timing og konkurranse: MiniDisc kom for sent på markedet. Før teknologien fikk etablert seg, hadde MP3-spillerne og CD-teknologien utviklet seg raskt, noe som gjorde MiniDisc overflødig. Lydkvalitet og format: For å få plass til like mye musikk som en CD, komprimerte MiniDisc lyden i Sonys eget ATRAC-format, noe som ga dårligere lydkvalitet enn CD-en. Begrenset utvalg av musikk: Det ble knapt utgitt ferdiginnspilte album på MiniDisc, noe som tvang brukerne til å ta opp all musikken selv fra andre kilder, for eksempel fra CD. Dyrere og mer komplisert: MiniDiscen var dyrere enn alternativer som CD-brennerne, som ble stadig billigere og mer tilgjengelige. Upopulær antikopieringsbeskyttelse: Den innebygde beskyttelsen mot kopiering var upopulær blant brukerne.
I hated the SCMS (or "SCUMS" as we called it.) They put it on the DAT machines too.
Load More Replies...I still have mine nd it is still far and away a great invention.
My brother had one. I remember the day he got it, and all the CD he borrowed off my other brother to put onto MiniDisk. At the time, I thought they looked really cool, but after a while, they just took up space on the shelf.
I was Yamaha pro audio service center. They had a minidisk recorder. They were not field serviceable and everyone had to be sent back to the LA factory service center for repair. The drives crashed, a lot.
Load More Replies...
Augmented reality glasses.
eac292625 reply:
They still have limited use in warehouses. We use them to quickly show item info and they’re really cool for that.
Microsoft Zune.
TypicalDaydreem reply:
Haha I asked my grandma for an iPod for Xmas one year and I got a pink zune. 😂
With the Zune you could 'squirt' music to other Zunes nearby! I loved watching Steve Balmer trying to make that sound cool!
I owned one of the first MP3 players to come to market, the Pine D'Music. I won it in a competition. It had 32mb (yes, mb) of storage, so held about 10 songs. This is in the pre-USB days, so the connector to transfer music was parallel port, and it took about 20 minutes to transfer the 10 songs over!
Democracy.
Carma_626 reply:
I wouldn’t say democracy failed. Of all the forms of government it seems to be the lesser of evils.
No regime is going to be flawless. As long as humans are involved, with their greed and self interest, it is virtually impossible to have a fair and equal government body.
If only the general population weren’t so completely stupid…
People who say this rarely propose a better alternatives. Anyone who is capable of getting themselves elected should on no account be allowed to run a country; it doesn't matter what political system there is, those in charge are in it for themselves.
I see this comment everywhere :"People who say this rarely propose a better alternatives." meaning, "why don't you do it if you know better" in all kinds of situations. Let me put it this way : I cannot drive a bus, but during my daily commutes I can very well make the distinction between a good and a bad busdriver.
Load More Replies...In too many cases the populace gave control of the government to big money. Then the government restricts education so the populace doesn't know what is really happening. Generally speaking, the countries with better quality of education have a better quality of democracy.
"Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others." -- Churchill (I think)
I think humans are inherently ungovernable in the long term. We are the strongest solvent the planet has produced to date - you can't keep us in or out of something forever, and we'll always find a way to tip things over. I suspect that rebooting quickly is one of democracy's strengths.
Always reminds me of that Ghostbusters line, "Choose the form of your destroyer" (IIRC) We have a set choice for party and leader, those choices are deliberately limited behind closed doors. You can have a REAL vote but it's no use when the choices have already been made and it doesn't matter who you choose..
It was easier to fight for democracy in the old days, because of oppressor's firepower. Back then you could rise against your oppressor, and everyone joins you and supports the cause. Nowadays with the firepower in the wrong hands, there are those who support the oppressor(s), those who 'just showed up' (and/or start screaming) or have no idea what's happening, all the misinformation. Is all the fighting worth it in the end, or is all for naught?
Gosh, it runs into issues, especially in one country - a country moreover, that for decades failed to accept its own shortcomings and celebrated ignorance. That's like saying that medicine failed because some idiot jumps with naked feet on rusty nails and gets an infection.
Just because it's not perfect, doesn't mean it doesn't work. Look at McDonalds!
Curved screen TVs. I thought I was in the future the first time I saw one of those.
I would argue Blockchain never attained its promise of a transformative technology. I would not be surprised if Bitcoin ends up in the same place.
I would argue no currency without a central figure to dictate value will actually be transformative. Simply because any value tied to it is purely speculative and as we can clearly see pure speculation is hyper volatile. Bit coin sort of side steps this because of how well it is known. It's name recognition adds weight to it. But the value is still purely speculative and derived from rarity like comic books only comic books are an actual thing and not a digital hashpin noting a completed hash task. Normal money systems are not real, this stuff never stood a chance.
When Radio Shack rebranded itself as "The Shack". It was one of the stupidest rebrands in history.
Hey, we still have some of those stupid things here.
Load More Replies...
HD DVD lost out to Blu-ray pretty spectacularly.
No-Author-2358 reply:
The picture quality of Blu-ray is amazing. So much better than DVD.
I heard, may not be true, but its mainly down to the P**n*graphy business that influences the winner of new media, like VHS / Betamax. P**n was distributed via VHS and that's what became the winner
Actually, there wasn't much of a difference except HD-DVD had a shorter capacity. 15/30 as opposed to BDs 25/50. HD-DVDs were easier to author and it didn't take much to re-tool the DVD plants to accomodate HD-DVDs. Blu discs have a very tough "covering" on them which makes them more durable, which is needed to protect the data because it's closer to the surface.
HD DVDs were actually a better picture quality on a smaller format, if I'm remembering correctly.
HD DVD ble en flopp fordi Blu-ray hadde overlegen teknisk ytelse og et bredere maskinvarestøtte, spesielt innenfor spillkonsoller, noe som førte til at Blu-ray ble den dominerende standarden i formatkrigen. HD DVD-formatet ble utviklet av Toshiba, mens Blu-ray ble utviklet av Sony, og etter en periode med konkurranse ble Blu-ray til slutt det eneste gjenværende formatet for høyoppløselige filmer, og HD DVD døde ut.
Sub Prime Mortgages.
Banks arranged things so they would make money whether the loan went belly up or not. There used to be a law preventing this (Glass-Steagall Act, 1933), but a certain political party repealed it in 1999. And look what happened.
I read they gave a fruit picker in California who made $12,000 a year, a $775,000 morgage. How do you think that worked out?
GREAT!!!..for the lender. We bailed their worthless a*s*s out.
Load More Replies...
Those Apple 🍎 Glasses 👓
Being 3500 USD, which priced it way above other VR sets on the market, and considering that VR is a niche, even Apple's name couldn't save it.
I remember when I was in middle school during the Bush administration we were told about how great hydrogen fuel cells were going to be and how every car would run on them. Haven’t heard much about hydrogen fuel cells since.
CNG is still around. It's a good value. The issue is no adoption. Also, the system itself still costs too much. Once again, the patent system has worked tirelessly to spurn any innovation to budding technologies. It's crazy how often "the need to generate profit" kills innovation.
Only Toyota has a hydrogen car that you can buy and in the US, you basically can only buy one if you live in California.
Dippin’ Dots.
Admiral_Ash reply:
I'm from Kansas and Dippin Dots are everywhere here. Still going strong.
What is it about zoos and Dippin' Dots? Why in the world is that their niche?
Load More Replies...What are they? I've heard of them for years but even when I Googled them, I wasn't sure.
It's like ice cream but comprised of a bunch of tiny individual spheres. It kind of resembles the structure of styrofoam.
Load More Replies...Dippin Dots are alive and well in northeast Ohio. I know of four places within a half-mile of places I've lived in the last ten years that carry them at all times.
Crystal Pepsi.
rakozink reply:
It was better than regular Pepsi. Not a high bar but I did appreciate it.
Am I the only one ancient enough to remember the New Coke?
Old enough and American. I don’t think they released it anywhere else. I’ve only heard about it by watching programs set in the 80s.
Load More Replies...What about the 2024 multi player game "Concord"? It was developed by Firewalk Studios and published by Sony. Apparently it cost at least 400 million dollars to make. The game lasted two weeks before it was permanently shut down. Insiders said that it failed due to the game being too woke. Every character had pronouns, something that turned off traditional gamers. There was also an environment of toxic positivity at the studios. The higher ups were convinced that this was going to be their Star Wars, the beginning of a billion dollar franchise. Staff weren't allowed to saying anything negative about the game, even if their concerns were legitimate.
Concord is definitely one of the biggest flops of all time financially. The arrogance before release, comparing it to Star Wars when there are so many live service multiplayer games to compete with, that had been released years earlier and already had established fan bases. Your game has to be amazing to stand out in a crowded market. And the no negatives during production is an insane rule.
Load More Replies...Am I the only one ancient enough to remember the New Coke?
Old enough and American. I don’t think they released it anywhere else. I’ve only heard about it by watching programs set in the 80s.
Load More Replies...What about the 2024 multi player game "Concord"? It was developed by Firewalk Studios and published by Sony. Apparently it cost at least 400 million dollars to make. The game lasted two weeks before it was permanently shut down. Insiders said that it failed due to the game being too woke. Every character had pronouns, something that turned off traditional gamers. There was also an environment of toxic positivity at the studios. The higher ups were convinced that this was going to be their Star Wars, the beginning of a billion dollar franchise. Staff weren't allowed to saying anything negative about the game, even if their concerns were legitimate.
Concord is definitely one of the biggest flops of all time financially. The arrogance before release, comparing it to Star Wars when there are so many live service multiplayer games to compete with, that had been released years earlier and already had established fan bases. Your game has to be amazing to stand out in a crowded market. And the no negatives during production is an insane rule.
Load More Replies...
