35 Times People Got Shamed For Their Dumb Opinions By The ‘Delusional Takes’ Twitter Page
Interview
As Justin Timberlake once famously put it in the classic “Cry Me a River”, some things are better left unsaid. Especially when it comes to sharing your thoughts online. However, not everybody knows where the limit is, which can be quite upsetting for the people that are oversharing but very entertaining for us.
The Twitter user @DelusionalPosting has made reveling in secondhand embarrassment easy by hand-picking the best of the worst and posting them for our enjoyment.
The delusional takes vary from very silly to very concerning. Some of them are simply insensitive or uneducated opinions that people should just keep to themselves. Others are statements that can be easily misinterpreted, especially out of context. And then there are the ones that are borderline criminal and make you want to quit the internet. The emotional rollercoaster is real.
We had a chat with Dr. Jessica Rabon, a licensed psychologist and the host of Psych Talk podcast. She explained why people overshare and gave tips on how to manage the urge to spill your guts online. But before we dive in, here are a few of the latest and the most cringe-inducing takes that the internet has to offer.
This post may include affiliate links.
what's terrifying is that this guy whose name is 'manlet king' thinks that killing fifty people is a normal and simple happy family thing to do and should be normalised
We all crave attention, so it’s not surprising that we choose to express our opinions (delusional and not so much) online. No wonder oversharing is quite a common online phenomenon. A study published in 2022 that surveyed 410 undergrad students found that more than 90% of them have seen someone overshare online and over 70% have unknowingly done it themselves.
We asked Dr. Rabon how oversharing in real life differs from doing it online, and it seems that there are several components that make it more common when sitting behind a keyboard. Firstly, social media encourages you to be generous with personal information. “We are influenced by what we see other people sharing and feel the need to share as well,” Dr. Rabon told Bored Panda.
Another thing that plays a part in it is detachment and immediate consequences. “Sharing a lot of personal details one-on-one is an intimate and, can be, an anxiety-provoking situation. However, when we post a status update, story, or video, <…> we are simultaneously talking to everyone and nobody at the same time. We don't have to see the facial expressions or reactions of others when we share, like we do in person, which lessens the feelings of awkwardness or anxiety.”
Add instant gratification provided by likes, comments, and shares and sprinkle some anonymity on top, and you have quite an appealing social concoction.
With that much stupidity you'd think they'd spontaneously combust.
Load More Replies...
Books. Books are things made out of paper. That you read. They have information in them. Please read them. There are also film reels, with footage. They are documentaries…
Sarcasm: You can read stories on a Kindle. It's weird how people can read information on a screen instead of paper. It's because books are fake. Writing words on paper never happened. The whole narrative and all the evidence is absurd. /s
Load More Replies...
He would have some excuse; possibly heel spurs? 😉
Load More Replies...
There's a reason why Madame Curie's body is still radioactive...I mean, just sayin'...
I would love to hear their theory on what really happened in Japan then.
If you read his thread without your eyes rolling back so hard they fall out of your head, he explains that they were just really big bombs. He doesn't think nuclear weapons actually exist, it's all a big conspiracy shared by the governments on the planet for reasons.
Load More Replies...
Tell that to all the innocent civilians that died from the bombs.
Been seeing these twits on the bird app lately. People will seemingly disregard anything if they can't wrap their mind around it.
I can prove that radiation is dangerous in less then 10 minutes, but if I did, they'd call me an actor.
Load More Replies... There are still to this day babies being born in Nagasaki and Hiroshima with deformities and health problems. To deny this is like denying the Holocaust.
Seriously, what's in it for you denying the threat atomic weapons pose?! Their whole point of existing is effectively a glorified political d**k measuring contest of who can annihilate the most people in an instance.
Radiation doesn't exist or is not dangerous you say. Could we send these two to the remaining hot zones in Fukushima to help with the cleanup?
Over 200,000 died there from the explosions and the following radiation. It took about a week for the radioactive material to disperse
Out of all the things I have read today, this one tops it for being the f***ing dumbest . Even Donald Trump calls this dumb....
Best part: "...all the evidence is absurd." Yeah, all that pesky evidence proving something right, ain't that a beyotch?
So OWEN, what you’re saying is that millions of people just died all at once?
So the millions of people who died are fake too, you insensitive dumbass.
As Einstein once said: "Only two things are infinite; the universe and human stupidity, and I am not too sure about the former." This cretin 'thinks' nukes are fake DESPITE the evidence? Many of the great apes and dolphins, among other species, have massively more intelligence than this moron. I am frankly amazed that he can tie his own shoelaces, let alone (apparently) even use a personal computer!
"...all the EVIDENCE is absurd." The guy is nuts. "nuclear blasts vaporised brick houses but not the old timey [sic] camera recording it." Perhaps because it and the observers were behind blast shields many miles away! The guy is nuts. "Hiroshima and Nagasaki never had any fallout radiation." Tell that to the many people who DIED from radiation poisoning. The guy is nuts! London to a brick he ALSO believes that vaccines cause autism, that COVID was a hoax, and the flat earth rubbish. "It's because nukes are fake." The guy is completely NUTS!
tell that to the men who cleaned up Chernobyl...oh wait you can't they died of radiation burns
I suggest these morons experience intense gamma rays personally and thus remove themselves from the gene pool.
Am I the only one who wants to suggest they move to the area right around the Chernobyl plant and eat only things that grow there to prove their theories?
Oh dear, someone never heard about tele lenses and long distance photography.
Yeah, I don't understand how a brick house get demolished but not the camera far away filming with a telescopic lense
I'm going to take a wild stab and guess this person is a Q"Anon dipstick that leans hard right.
the evidence is absurd... riiiight. Don't confuse them with facts...
And that dude had no problems finding a mate and making 4 babies. A great example of the complete and utter lack of selection pressure on the human race today.
To think somebody ACTUALLY believes this. Their world must be really nice.
According to Dr. Rabon, in some cases, people overshare to soothe negative emotions, too. For example, anxious people tend to seek reassurance from others and they may overshare on social media to get it. They also may be more likely to stay on top of the latest trends or news as they might suffer from the fear of missing out.
Loneliness may also be responsible for oversharing. “Online platforms allow for immediate feedback, says Dr. Rabon. If people are lonely and seeking connection, they may be more likely to overshare online <…> to feel less alone.”
According the curvature in the upper image, it looks like a lighthouse in Sweden could be seen from Uzbekistan. By the way, something is clear: Whitewalker420 has never been in a ship in his whole life (or was too busy eating at the buffet in the cruiser).
People can have strong, consolidated opinions about the most stupid things in life.
So, is oversharing all bad? Dr. Rabon says that there are some positives. “Depending on what is shared, one potential benefit of sharing personal information is increased connections with others online who are similar to you. Many people who form relationships with others online do so by sharing about themselves to make connections.”
She also adds that for individuals that are struggling with their mental health, sharing their experiences online might provide support that they need. That can be especially important if they are hesitant to talk about their struggles in person.
However, Dr. Rabon is quick to point out that the negatives tend to outweigh the positives. According to her, the biggest risk people take when oversharing is safety: “People share all kinds of personal information online, including things that could be potential passwords, their current location, information about their kids, or venting posts about their relationship. It only takes that information getting into the hands of the wrong person to risk your safety.”
Then there’s a risk of losing your job because of mentioning confidential information, venting about your boss, or admitting to doing things you weren’t supposed to be doing. Dr. Rabon also adds that oversharing can have social consequences as well, such as rumors being spread, gossip, or social isolation.
If you have pictures of grown a*s men playing fake soldier (and who have never been one) and who think they need a gun to stay safe at a library, send me a picture so i have something to point and laugh at, you pathetic f***s. Your hobby is a coping mechanism for your crippling insecurity.
I WOULD eat a T-Rex, so I guess, I can eat the chicken! (Don't tell the T-Rex I said that though!)
The good thing is that there are ways to curb your need to broadcast your life. As oversharing often stems from powerful emotions such as anger or sadness, Dr. Rabon suggests stepping away from the phone before making your opinions public: “One strategy I like to use is making the post/video but saving it as a draft and then going back the next day and deciding if it is something I still want to post. If it is not, once I have calmed down, I will delete it and know that the post was motivated by emotions, not logic.”
Another strategy is asking yourself "Would I be okay with my grandma, boss, or [insert any person here] seeing this post?" If not, then maybe you reconsider posting it. If you notice patterns of oversharing, you can also limit your social media usage as research suggests that people who spend more time on social media are more likely to overshare.
The marriage rate has dropped nearly 60% in 50 years, so more men are safely unmarried. Should we aim for 100%?
Dr. Rabon also encourages people to do some self-reflection on why they want to post what they’re posting. Is it because it's about something that’s important for them, something they are passionate about and want to share with friends and family? Or are they sharing because you are upset, hurt, angry, or seeking validation? If it is the latter, then maybe it’s something to keep to yourself.
So, check in with yourself next time you type up a tweet, or you might find your opinions amplified on the @DelusionalPosting feed.
I've been a full-time carer for my husband for 30+ years. Had to give up a much-loved job, lost a lot of friends, financial problems, bla bla bla. In my long years I've met people who stood by their loved one, period. I've met people whose attitude was "Hell no, I didn't sign up for this, I'm out". I've met people who were mentally driven into the ground by the self-obsessed, egocentric and self-pitying attitude of the sick person and I've met people who tried, tried hard, found they were spiralling into depression and had to step back in order to simply hold on to their sanity and life. Please, when confronted with a story with a heading like this, keep an open mind and ponder whether you're required to set yourself on fire to keep someone else warm and have mercy.
Breast feeding has existed for much longer than politics. The difference between the 2 is that even though they both involve t*ts, one set is hated and the other feeds the baby
The more probable explanation is that people hate other people who drive/ride like a**holes. Exactly what vehicle they're using is irrelevant. (For that matter, pedestrians can be a**holes too.)
Why does the internet not seem to have any nuance? Who are all these weirdly extreme people?
Actually " literally everybody " knows that no one deserves to be subject to persecution, segregation, or massacres based on something they can't control.
Is "ouid" some new tiktokified nonsense like "unalive", or is it some special French form of recreation?
Note: this post originally had 88 images. It’s been shortened to the top 35 images based on user votes.
Yes lol. So many of these are so obviously taken out of context or missing obvious jokes
Load More Replies...
Many of these lack context. Some are replies to posts that were not included and some are clickbait headlines that don’t provide the whole story which includes nuance
Hi Zelda. Gotta disagree with you. It was very interesting. Since you're downvoting everyone who disagrees with you, I've gone through and upvoted them. I'm sure you'll downvote me too, but that's the sacrifice I have to make lol
Load More Replies...
Couldn't even make it through the list. The whining was bad, but the whining about the whining was intolerable.
I was overcome by the ignorant stupidity and had to stop reading.
I've been over "being shocked" for a long time at what weird hills people are willing to die upon, but I'm still surprised by some of them...
Does no one understand that the list is about delusional thinking, so there's no reason to comment on every post with an explanation about how that poster is delusional?
I'm sorry but most of these were some of the stupidest things ever written in the English language
sometimes i look at psots like these and understand serial killers more
Twitter users try to be normal challenge. (Difficulty: IMPOSSIBLE?!?!?)
Look underneath the last one... "Note: this post originally had 88 images. It’s been shortened to the top 35 images based on user votes." You can click the link and see all 88.
Load More Replies...
Yes lol. So many of these are so obviously taken out of context or missing obvious jokes
Load More Replies... Many of these lack context. Some are replies to posts that were not included and some are clickbait headlines that don’t provide the whole story which includes nuance
Hi Zelda. Gotta disagree with you. It was very interesting. Since you're downvoting everyone who disagrees with you, I've gone through and upvoted them. I'm sure you'll downvote me too, but that's the sacrifice I have to make lol
Load More Replies... Couldn't even make it through the list. The whining was bad, but the whining about the whining was intolerable.
I was overcome by the ignorant stupidity and had to stop reading.
I've been over "being shocked" for a long time at what weird hills people are willing to die upon, but I'm still surprised by some of them...
Does no one understand that the list is about delusional thinking, so there's no reason to comment on every post with an explanation about how that poster is delusional?
I'm sorry but most of these were some of the stupidest things ever written in the English language
sometimes i look at psots like these and understand serial killers more
Twitter users try to be normal challenge. (Difficulty: IMPOSSIBLE?!?!?)
Look underneath the last one... "Note: this post originally had 88 images. It’s been shortened to the top 35 images based on user votes." You can click the link and see all 88.
Load More Replies...