ADVERTISEMENT

When we go to see a doctor, we can rest assured knowing that they are qualified to be treating illnesses, prescribing medicine and diagnosing diseases. They have completed at least a decade of education after high school and have endured rigorous training and testing to ensure that they know what they’re doing. 

When we log onto the internet, however, anyone with a keyboard and an opinion can feel free to spout whatever medical misinformation they like, so we should take everything we read online with a grain of salt. Thankfully, there is one page that’s dedicated to calling out irresponsible and inaccurate medical advice that’s shared online: the Bad Medical Takes Twitter account.

We’ve gathered some of the most ridiculous, hilarious and alarming posts Bad Medical Takes has shared down below, so you too can enjoy hearing all of the wacky ideas ignorant people felt the need to share online. Be sure to upvote the claims you wish were posted satirically, and then let us know in the comments what the worst medical advice you’ve ever received was. And then if you’re interested in another Bored Panda article featuring medical takes that are definitely not doctor approved, you can find our last story on the same Twitter account right here.

#1

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes , twitter.com Report

Add photo comments
POST
colintimp avatar
Colin Timp
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So nobody's ever died in childbirth or from pregnancy complications? Nobody has ended their life from post-partum depression?

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

The Bad Medical Takes Twitter account initially launched in March 2020, which I can only assume came in response to all of the misinformation that was rapidly being spread about the COVID-19 virus. When the pandemic began, everyone on the internet suddenly turned into a medical professional, and with billions of desperate people around the world searching for hope and answers, false claims spread like wildfire.

But I can’t put all of the blame for bad medical advice running rampant online on the pandemic. The internet has been saturated with fake news long before 2020, so it only made sense for medical advice to make its way into the same category. But the difference between reading fake news about a politician and being told to shoot bleach into your veins is that the latter is extremely dangerous. So false medical claims deserve to be called out and shut down even more than your run-of-the-mill fake news.   

ADVERTISEMENT

You might be wondering how anyone in the world could possibly believe the claims shared on this list in the first place, and I’ll be honest, I’m wondering too. So to try to gain some insight on the topic, I consulted an article from Medical News Today exploring just how these false claims are perceived as credible information. And it turns out that there are certain factors that can cause a person to be more or less susceptible to believing medical misinformation.

One 2021 study found that people with a lower education level and individuals who have less knowledge of healthcare issues are more likely to believe inaccurate medical claims. Also, people who have a lack of trust in the healthcare system are more inclined to view alternative treatments positively and more likely to believe false medical claims. The study also found that participants who believed one false medical claim were likely to fall for even more as well, so perhaps they are just more gullible than the average person. 

#7

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
linda_48 avatar
Aunt Riarch
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

There's only one person in this exchange who I wouldn't trust not to drool

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#8

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes , twitter.com Report

Add photo comments
POST
livlisbon84 avatar
Olivia Lisbon
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Apparently a lot of politicians are under the same delusion when it comes to options in ectopic pregnancies.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
#9

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes , twitter.com Report

Add photo comments
POST
vanburensupernova44 avatar
Buren
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I'm about to commit massive butchery to the extension of my central nervous system this afternoon.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

Lead author of the study, Dr. Laura D. Scherer of the University of Colorado School of Medicine shed some light on the value of this study’s findings. “Inaccurate information is a barrier to good healthcare because it can discourage people from taking preventive measures to head off illness and make them hesitant to seek care when they get sick,” she explained. “Identifying who is most susceptible to misinformation might lend considerable insight into how such information spreads and provide us with new avenues for intervention.”

One of the most notable factors contributing to the spread of medical misinformation online is distrust in the healthcare system, and it might be becoming worse and worse over time. One survey reported that between 2017 and 2018, there was a 20% drop in the amount of trust the American public holds in their healthcare system. And globally, there was a 4% decrease in citizens’ trust in their healthcare systems. When people don’t trust the professionals, they start seeking outside, unverified information, which is likely informed by their own views and biases.      

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have witnessed a concerning shift over the last several decades where policy decisions seem to be driven by ideology and politics instead of facts and evidence,” American Medical Association president Dr. Patrice A. Harris said during a national address. “The result is a growing mistrust in American institutions — in science — and in the counsel of leading experts who dedicate their lives to the pursuit of evidence and reason.”

#13

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes , twitter.com Report

Add photo comments
POST
suuspuusje avatar
Susie Elle
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Why is everyone talking about salts and nobody mentions the bacteria and viruses in ocean water

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#15

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
emilia-thi avatar
Moolia
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

If other people being alive was such a problem for you, it was a mistake to have kept you alive 🤷

View more commentsArrow down menu

Another factor that might be exacerbating the issue of false medical claims online is the appetite that social media platforms have for fake news. While social media can be great a tool for sharing news and awareness of social issues, it can also be extremely hard to fact check what is being spread, and the more outlandish a claim is, the faster it will be circulated. In fact, one 2021 study from the NYU School of Global Health found that people who were primarily or exclusively using social media to track pandemic-related information were less likely to be practicing the most up-to-date public health safety practices. And another study from GoodRx found that being exposed to false medical claims online can negatively affect a patient’s health literacy. 

ADVERTISEMENT
#17

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
livlisbon84 avatar
Olivia Lisbon
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I’ve had the exact same incredulous facial expression for five whole minutes now, and this list isn’t getting any less stupid.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#18

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
ami-ainsworth avatar
Anonymous
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Thank goodness my broken leg is just a deception made up by dairy farmers!! Silly me thought I actually needed this cast. *circular saw starts up* /s

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
See Also on Bored Panda

Inaccurate medical information being circulated online is not only relating to COVID-19 and the vaccines being used to prevent it. Users might find misinformation about anything from smoking and drug use to claims about other vaccines, like the HPV vaccine, causing various health issues. Thankfully, many users don’t actually trust the claims they see, as only 6% of people said they trust information about COVID on social media sites in one survey, but it is still concerning how rapidly these claims spread. In fact, medical misinformation sometimes makes it to 87% of users’ feeds on social media sites. Even if only 5% of these people believe the claims, that could lead to devastating consequences. 

#19

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
ovataacronicta avatar
Ovata Acronicta
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Yes. I'll get the flu vax in the other arm from the cov booster just to annoy Nathan in particular.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#20

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
fredneobob90 avatar
Huddo's sister
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So all that time scientists spent working out blood types and they could have just broken it into male and female blood? Thankyou random person on the internet!

View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
See Also on Bored Panda

So what are public health agencies supposed to do to limit the spread of false claims online? Is it their responsibility to monitor social media? Well, it’s a delicate issue. “Social media can also be volatile: false information, sometimes maliciously created, spreads rapidly,” the Frontiers in Public Health authors wrote. “Thus, measures to counter misinformation and disinformation on social media channels during an emergency are necessary. Given that government censorship can deeply aggravate already existing mistrust, measures other than content removal is needed, as the public shares and reacts positively to factual information, especially if posted by public health agencies.”

#22

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
ner_diz avatar
Serial pacifist
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Oh my God, this person deserves to be locked in a cage with two male primates and rubbed with estrogen, just to see what kind of offspring they would produce.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

In 2021, US Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy issued an advisory on medical misinformation, calling for actual healthcare professionals to use their own social media platforms to cut through the false claims and spread truth online. He also asked that healthcare agencies partner with trusted community members like church leaders and clinicians to make sure that the public hears accurate information from people they trust. He also noted that this issue cannot be solved overnight. Combatting medical misinformation online will be a long-term effort, so hopefully, over time, the public’s health literacy will be increased. And false claims online will become a thing of the past.  

#25

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
ner_diz avatar
tinasmith avatar
Tina Smith
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's a click bait headline. To be fair on this one, the author (a doctor) is in favor of low cost insulin and the title is misleading. The gist of the article "Because insulin prices and efficacy levels are decreasing, doctors are forced daily to decide between the best medication for our patients and the medication that our patients can afford," Dr. Rose wrote.

colintimp avatar
Colin Timp
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Makes no sense. People are dying now. Exactly what are these "newer, better treatments" that apparently don't involve insulin? I'm sure they'll be even more affordable than insulin is now, right?

debbykeir avatar
Debby Keir
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Metformin. Metformin is usually the first medicine used to treat type 2 diabetes. ... SGLT2 inhibitors. ... GLP-1 agonists. ... Sulphonylureas. ... Pioglitazone. ... Gliptins (DPP-4 inhibitors) ... These are the current excellent treatrments for type 2 diabetes. Type 1 is insulin only.

Load More Replies...
grahamchapman avatar
Graham Chapman
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

My partner is type 1, therefore there is no charge here in the UK..

balbicky avatar
Milan
Community Member
1 year ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

By us (Slovakia) average price is 50€. Approx 30€ is paid by health insurance (it is mandatory to have here) and for the rest pay the person. So yes, we can say that insulin is cheap here and save lifes.

ragnhild avatar
Nilsen
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Here (Norway) the total copay for all health treatment including prescription medicine is NOK 2900 (€ 280). Insulin and cancer treatment isn't include in this and is free from first dose.

Load More Replies...
debbykeir avatar
Debby Keir
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Actually, insulin is the 'second (or last) line' of treatment for type 2 diabetes. The main ones - tablets - try to stimulate the pancreas to make more natural insulin. Once you start giving/taking insulin in the longer term, the pancreas packs up completely, and you have a 'worse' variation. Taking metformin (plus other similar meds) plus diet and exercise, is far more likely to keep you stable and stave off the nasty complications than insulin. In the US, I understand that ALL diabetes treatments are expensive, but in the UK 56 x 500mg metformin tablets are £13.99. If you have cheap insulin but expensive metformin, people will not learn to manage the diabetes and yes, are more likely to die. So, strongly disagree. I quote from the actual article "But for the 90 percent of Americans with diabetes who have type 2, it should not routinely be the first-, second-, or even third-line treatment. The reasons for this are many:" etc

dale_williams_1 avatar
Dale Williams
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

But for those of us with Type 1, or Type 2 that has progressed to the point that their pancreas can no longer supply the same amount of insulin that their body needs, Insulin is currently the ONLY way we can stay alive, without giving ourselves Insulin, either by multiple daily injections or via a continuous insulin pump, we WILL either end up in Hospital with a a condition known as Diabetic Ketoacidosis (really painful and can cause permanent damage as it turns the blood acidic) or we will die, neither option is something we want.

Load More Replies...
gloeiend_1 avatar
October
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think he's mixing up type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Type 1 is treated with insulin and there is NO alternative.

ayelet-cooper avatar
alwaysMispelled
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Newer, better treatments than insulin? Type 1 diabetics literally need insulin to continue living.

guineveremariesmith avatar
Gwyn
Community Member
1 year ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This doesn't belong here. I've read the article and he has a good point. There are better treatments coming. We need to focus on making those affordable too or many people on insulin will be left behind with what will soon be considered substandard treatment for them. If you want more info read the article. Also Peter Attia MD has a great podcast The Drive that hits on this topic with active research scientists quite often in molecular detail. I'm really surprised that there are so many commenters on Bored Panda bashing this without looking into it at least a little bit, usually this group is pretty well educated, but there's a lot to learn about out there. It's exciting to think there may be better things coming for these patients.

rogersmary523 avatar
Mary Rogers
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I agree that the article is being misrepresented. But the real issue is that whatever medication is the best one for a person's type of diabetes should be affordable, regardless of whether it is insulin or a newer medication.

Load More Replies...
staceymontebello_1 avatar
stacey montebello
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This article was about people with type 2 diabetes who are not insulin dependent (witch is technically most people with "diabetes".) The argument is by making insulin cheaper people who have other, sometimes better drug options will be more likely to be just prescribe insulin. Its my understanding that people who are type 2 are at higher risk of adverse side effects that type 1. Type 1 diabetics need insulin to survive and the rationing of insulin has killed a lot of people. But the the article writer was arguing that b/c significantly more people have type 2 over type 1 more people overall could die. What is not address is the core issue, Dr.s prescribing the most affordable drug, is b/c US pharmaceutical companies are allowed to charge astronomically high prices for meds that cost pennies to make for huge mark ups.

ange_marsden avatar
Ange Marsden
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I wish there was a better treatment than injecting insulin but no...$0-$5 every 3 months in NZ depending on the pharmacy you go to

bobzilla2k avatar
Robert Miller
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Tell me you're a rich ahole without saying you're a rich ahole ...

carol-a-stephen1 avatar
Carol Stephen
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

anybody read the article? This refers to type 2 diabetics, not insulin-dependent Type 1.

shelbyjackson avatar
debbykeir avatar
Debby Keir
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Metformin. Metformin is usually the first medicine used to treat type 2 diabetes. ... SGLT2 inhibitors. ... GLP-1 agonists. ... Sulphonylureas. ... Pioglitazone. ... Gliptins (DPP-4 inhibitors) ... see above

Load More Replies...
ryanhealy_1 avatar
Ryan Healy
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I used to subscribe to the Atlantic years ago but now I'm embarrassed. It's just the worst garbage. At one point it was kind of respectable.

wehelpalot avatar
Dixie Lee
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

As a dedicated diabetic I understand this. Newer, better treatments are EXPENSIVE and very hard to come by in rural areas. Yes I've lowered insulin when I didn't have the money for it. Newer and better would price me out and I'd have nothing at all.

shannonveillon avatar
RajunCajun
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I see where he is trying to go with this. it's like this; a half a*s med that works half the time $5 or you can buy this good med that works all the time $20. but he is not seeing that if you can only pay for the $5 med, then that is better than nothing at all.

bksf avatar
UKGrandad
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Sounds like industry spin from a company marketing that newer, 'better' *patented* treatment. A more honest version would read "if insulin becomes cheaper than our more expensive treatment, our profits and share values will decrease".

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#27

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
ovataacronicta avatar
Ovata Acronicta
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Ah, no, you're thinking of one of those substandard mannequins for drawing references.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

If you're not in the medical field, I hope you are getting a kick out of these ridiculous claims, and if you are a healthcare professional, I just want to apologize on behalf of the general public. I promise we don't all think this way. Keep upvoting the posts that you find most hilarious and facepalm-worthy, and then let us know in the comments what the worst medical take you've ever heard was. And if you're interested in laughing at even more horrible medical advice, don't forget to check out our last article on the same topic right here.

#30

Bad-Medical-Takes

BadMedicalTakes Report

Add photo comments
POST
nadiamontera avatar
Nadia Montera
Community Member
1 year ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Extract from Wikipedia : Hexagonal water, also known as gel water, structured water, cluster water, H3O2 or H3O2 is a term used in a marketing scam that claims the ability to create a certain configuration of water that is better for the body. The term "hexagonal water" refers to a cluster of water molecules forming a hexagonal shape that supposedly enhances nutrient absorption, removes metabolic wastes, and enhances cellular communication, among other things. The scam takes advantage of the consumer's limited knowledge of chemistry, physics, and physiology. Gel water is referenced in the version of the hoax in which plants or animal fascia are said to create or contain a "fourth phase" of water with an extra hydrogen and an extra oxygen, despite the simple reality that this compound is neither water, nor stable—in other words it doesn't exist in any practical sense

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

Note: this post originally had 46 images. It’s been shortened to the top 30 images based on user votes.

See Also on Bored Panda