Ever since last December, people have been entertaining themselves by participating in an open community project called "Take a photo of the Rembrandt type".
The project’s feed on Vk.com already has more than 300 submissions, featuring people’s best attempts at replicating famous works of Classic Art. The best part is, it’s not just limited to Rembrandt’s art! Some of the entrants manage to reproduce the atmosphere of the masterpieces with meticulous detail, and many use humor as well.
Scroll down the page and take a look at the best attempts of finding or creating a likeness between art and reality!
More info: vk.com
This post may include affiliate links.
wonder if she was the real subject of this artwork when this was painted centuries ago
I was like "this is a brilliant idea" and immediately scrolled down to find the Peter Paul Rubens paintings. None! Are Rubenesque figures out of vogue???
It's beautiful and well done, but to me, the expression is quite different.
I think it's the extreme difference between the eye and chin shapes that are making it appear that way. Can't do much about that.
Load More Replies...Amazing. I thought the photo with the real woman was a painting, too.
Thank goodness for that tho right?! :) the worlds a better place with that little button nose in it!
Load More Replies...I just don't like this one- a matter of personal taste. I like the sketch-like quality of the original and the recreation feels a little too soft and pretty in comparison. I also feel like the colors are too dark. Obviously they can't and maybe should't be exact copies but I feel like a choice was made to make it prettier- her facial expression is softer too, the snake is less ugly and it's smaller and blends in more- even the fruit is more physically attractive. I just don't like this interpretation.
I didn't think cats like the one in the painting existed and they just had never seen a cat when they painted it, but I guess I was wrong
Enjoy this! https://www.boredpanda.com/ugly-medieval-cats-art/
Load More Replies...That painting looks like the physical form of the word “nyoop”. “I must nyoop my stretchy kitty body!!”
This is an amazing recreation and the lady as Judith is really gorgeous!
Prompted by her mother, Herodias, who was infuriated by John's condemnation of her marriage, the girl demanded the head of John the Baptist on a platter, and the unwilling Herod was forced by his oath to have John beheaded. Salome took the platter with John's head and gave it to her mother.
Loraine Bobbit was content with just cutting off one’s male pride.
I think the use of the gauzy material was a great idea but I think even acid-wash frayed jean shorts would have been a better choice for the bottoms. I don't really get that. Ultimately it's the expression that is totally wrong though. The leg is bent incorrectly, and the figure in the painting is not making direct eye contact, which seems crucial to me. In a simple piece like this, I think those details matter.
The head wrap bothers me because it is such a different material and lit so differently (possibly to hide that fact somewhat). It's not bad otherwise, though the expression is very off, starting with the head tilt/angle. I believe the face in the original has more tension in it- that can be interpreted by people in many different ways. Fear, longing, weariness, anxiety, whatever. The modern model looks overall relaxed but trying to mimic the original's face. Not quite the same thing, imo.
I think the left picture she needs to look just slightly more surprised, then it would be freakishly accurate.
Susannah Harker looked exactly like that painting when she played in Pride And Prejudice
Don't know why you were disliked cause it's true. Tried to even it out.
Load More Replies...Not quite, that’s a hard one even Scarjo had to ne Photoshopped
I like this, even though it's not as literal a copy as some of the others - it's good in its own right.
This is a project by an Albanian photographer, who recreated famous paintings with Autistic children. Simply wonderful❤️
Does anyone else see a skull image on the right? Other than that, adorable pic!
Look of the dog from the right more similar to the look of the girls from the left ))
The one on the left is looking at the viewer. The one on the right isn't. Otherwise, very similar.
Constantly cropping up in my family. Know a lot of red heads in other families.
Load More Replies...Top pic: Hey Fred, you got a bullet hole there. Bottom pic: Never mind, it's gone now.
Edit: ?Hey *Jesus*, you got a bullet hole there... :)
Load More Replies...Great lighting - they should have photoshopped half the guys finger off though - lol
Yes, it's cool to see the different interpretations.
Load More Replies...Well done. Even colored the syphon. The hair is great, the painting in the back. Unfortunately, in the recreation she has an actual elbow.
This made me laugh out loud and not exaggerating. I LOLed at my desk. Thank you.
Load More Replies...Ooh a tough one... if only Margate was on the list!
Load More Replies...I didn't know that recreating paintings was such a big thing, much less that someone would go to so much effort to make the dress. And, one presumes, more outfits for their studio. Interesting gimmick/theme for the studio, though.
Load More Replies...The original little girl was 5/6 in this picture - she died following childbirth age 21
Load More Replies...Both girls are thinking "How much longer do I have to stand still like this?"
there is loads of paintings of her on the internet - Las Malinas? - all by Velasquez - court painter
Load More Replies...Here is one they made the poor original child wear earlier margarita-...a682a8.jpg
I often wonder how the hell women and girls walked in those ridiculous dresses!
Original - Diego Velasquez 1656 - Infanta Theresa Maria of Spain. Here is something else they made that poor child wear to get painted in margarita-...c347ef.jpg
Maybe they didn't have a brush small enough to blur that out *snerk*
Load More Replies...I wish I could add a pic here... my daughters did an amazing recreation.
Sphynx cat is a perfect stand-in for an ermine! They're so cute in their own way.
I like these where you can tell that they're just doing it on a whim. It seems more relatable, I guess.
Well not everyone can pull off that "homeless child on the streets selling ribbons for sustenance" look perfectly.
Load More Replies...Expressions are off, but very well done. Why is this not up above the animal photos and kids in the tub?!
Because this is super try-hard, self serious photoshopped to death instagram-bait and the animal and kid photos are lighthearted spur of the moment bits of fluff not meant to be take seriously?
Load More Replies...My thoughts exactly, are we really that precious these days?
Load More Replies...Can all museums PLEASE cover up all the nudes' privates immediately, this Da Vinci person should be banned, this is an advanced society for God sake
Bored Panda must believe all its users are under five years old and must be protected from a sketch of human anatomy.
While those five year olds and younger care the least about nudity. It’s perfectly natural to them.
Load More Replies...Something that was on front of plenty of schoolbooks is getting censored, really?.
I suppose I'm the only one that thinks it looks like she's being flushed.
We're going more Puritan instead of open-minded. These projects show human thinking throughout the ages, and sometimes it's eye-opening. We can't look at schematic genitalia? It will damage our fragile minds? Yet we have artificial boob and camelhoof enlargement bombardment on- and off-line. Hypocrits.
Thinking about how to dodge a party they've planned for the next year.
I don't know if you're talking about the person in the original or in the recreation, but either way I'm guessing you are saying the gender doesn't match in a way you deem acceptable, to which I will respond: I don't remember voting you head of the gender police. So buzz off.
Load More Replies...The lady on the right looks like her chin is attached to her hand...
science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/edible-innovations/absinthe.htm
So, it appears this person altered the original painting- tinted it green, cropped it, brightened it maybe, which is MAJORLY UNCOOL. The original is plenty creep on its own. All the guys work is kind of creepy, check it out. This person clearly didn't get WHAT is creepy about it. They messed up the colors and shadows, for one. The original's cheery pink juxtaposed with the black shadows (and shapes that look like fractured glass) are what make it creepy- the innocent against the sinister. And the recreation is also framed very poorly. The small figure is supposed to take up very little of the frame and be in the darkness in the original. In the recreation, she has made herself the focal point, literally- the light is centered on her. But in the painting the figure is made to look small and vulnerable next to the huge jagged bush, and also she's darkly lit and strange looking- a source of creepiness too. These juxtapositions are what makes the painting creepy- not basic goth stuff.
To all of those making the tongue in cheek joke about which is worse: wanna be slamma-jammaed by REALITY?? The original is called The Apotheosis of War by Vasily Vereshchagin, finished in 1871. He was a Russian war artist, meaning he traveled with various Russian armies and painted/drew what he saw as a way to witness and record what it was like (a common thing in many countries, including US, UK, etc). When he finished this painting he dedicated it " . . . to all great conquerors, past, present and to come." which was pretty sassy. He was known for being brutally honest in his depictions of what he saw and it often got him in a lot of trouble, this painting especially was banned from being viewed and lots of his art was controversial and ultimately banned from being reproduced. He was a brave guy and very well known in his day. So . . . that might make you think about this picture differently. Artistic license and all, but still . . . yikes.
The cat in the painting looks like a living shadow entity ready to exact its revenge against the child that holds it back.
Oh my good! There is hardly any similarity. But the obese animal directs your attention away from that fact.
Fun and clever. And the copied guns...genius. I really enjoyed this one.
Art student life, what you think it is like and what it actually is like
Not being able to finish a pizza!!! The horror of it...
Load More Replies...Me just after completing an assignment that is due for the past three weeks within a couple of hours before the deadline.
This is fascinating because that woman is clearly not attempting to recreate the painting. If she were, she would not be wearing the several necklaces, she would not be sitting beside those leaves, and most likely she would have her hand in the image. So who randomly had a photograph of a woman in a fancy dress with such a similar face and hair??
They were using it as inspiration and decided to add their own spin. I don't think it's up to you to decide what the were trying to do.
Load More Replies...Except that nothing about the recreation matches the original.
Load More Replies...Why the vines? It appears it may have been for a different painting entirely, and then they couldn't find it again.
What I like is that her facial expression is so right on! Many models cannot manage that feature.
Let me sincerely answer this. (Lol.) For one, the woman in the original is fairly unattractive with a very high forehead and thinning hair. That's not the creep factor though, that just adds to it. The creep factor is, the body proportions are hugely uncanny valley here, for reason unknown. Her hands, arms, and torso are also massive compared to her head size. And I'm not talking about in relation to weight- the frame size doesn't match at ALL. Also, try to visualize her head and neck placement if the head cover thing was removed: that would be one looong neck (or a shorter neck with some sort of a hunch- not the pointed part of cloak obvs, but the long slope that still exists under it) connecting her small head to a pair of very broad and heavy shoulders. And that head would be covered with pale-blonde thinning, balding hair. On a browless, otherwise fairly young, sharp featured woman, who on top of that looks fairly obese on that large frame. IT'S UNSETTLING.
Load More Replies...Me drinking at 21 not pictured, cause I was out partying (mildly). Top pic was me drinking at 31. I predict bottom pic will be me at 41, like my husband was.
Load More Replies...clearly, it took the person recreating the painting in the photo a little to long setting things up ...
I was thinking that myself. Nice interpretation tho.
Load More Replies...Also gonna comment on the POST since that's what we're supposed to be HERE FOR. I think she nailed the facial expression, but I gotta ask: what do you do with the custom background now that the photoshoot is over? Is this a thing photo studios provide now? Lol.
Corseted and uncorseted, meaning many more layers
Load More Replies...Me trying to look somewhere else after seeing an acquaintance in public.
But if you look closely you can see that the Cavalier is barely even smiling. It's the mustache that's laughing.
Load More Replies...But at least they tried - and it looks like they had fun with it.
Load More Replies...These were all amazing. While I loved the joke pictures, I absolutely loved the proper recreations. They were so... real. I'm f****n inspired right now. (Side note: where I am, it's now 11:49pm on the 31st of December. And HOLY S**T. It's almost the New Year. The fireworks are booming, my dog is barking and the drunk a*s neighbors have a f*****g microphone sound system. That's one way to start 2019. 😑) Wish me luck, bitches.
If these are all famous artworks, it just goes to show how much I do not know my art.
These were all amazing. While I loved the joke pictures, I absolutely loved the proper recreations. They were so... real. I'm f****n inspired right now. (Side note: where I am, it's now 11:49pm on the 31st of December. And HOLY S**T. It's almost the New Year. The fireworks are booming, my dog is barking and the drunk a*s neighbors have a f*****g microphone sound system. That's one way to start 2019. 😑) Wish me luck, bitches.
If these are all famous artworks, it just goes to show how much I do not know my art.
