27 Movies That Didn’t Stand The Test Of Time Despite Being So Popular At First
The first time you watch a new movie can be an awesome experience and you might end up falling in love with that movie. But occasionally, when the bliss of the first impression goes away, you start thinking about what you have watched. And then you realize that the movie doesn’t really make sense or even is poorly made. This way a cherished movie can very easily become a hated one.
Today, let’s take a look at what internet folks named to be movies that once were critically acclaimed masterpieces and now are hated by a bunch of people.
More info: Reddit
This post may include affiliate links.
Idiocracy was a beloved farcical comedy and is now viewed as a dystopian documentary from 3-5 years in the future
definitely in the US. Soo much stupid here.
Load More Replies...This video always come to mind when seeing fitting squares in holes! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz8ssH7LiB0 😄
While there's no doubt that Idiocracy is full of social commentary, it is, at the end of the day, just a movie and doesn't really need to go that "deep" in analysis. The "this is the way things are going to be if we keep going this way" message is clear but we're far away from it ever becoming reality.
I am waiting on Bohemian Rhapsody. It's a biopic that is 90% made up and none of the critics seem fit to mention this.
Freddie Mercury did not leave the band to make a solo record while under the bad influence of some gay Svengali only to get diagnosed with AIDS and get back together with the boys for their stellar Live Aid performance.
The band never broke up before Live Aid. In fact I know someone who seen them tour a couple of months before Live Aid. He wasn't even the first guy in the band to have a solo record. He didn't perform at Live Aid knowing he was going to die because he didn't actually get his diagnosis until almost 2 years later which is also around the time when he got around to firing Paul Prenter.
Also the portrayal of Freddie as a gay man feels like some weird throwback to the 1980s when all gay characters in movies for portrayed as sad, conflicted and persecuted. He was a good looking superstar who by all accounts thoroughly enjoyed his ridiculously opulent hedonistic lifestyle.
This is a movie that in the end genuinely tries to make you believe that Queen alone saved Live Aid and by extension Africa....oh and they also invented overdubbing and audience participation.
I HATE how Freddie was portrayed. I feel he was done a complete injustice, regardless of the storyline. I hate how they made him seem so stuck up and pretentious, and the way he reacted to the media and his family was so out of character. I have watched nearly all the Queen and Freddie Mercury documentaries, and he was not like that at all. In real life, he was sweet and shy. Plus, those teeth were absolutely ridiculous, like a parody on SNL. He was extremely self-conscious of his teeth and didn't flash them all over the place. Also, when they showed him writing new songs, it was just ugh. Like he really sat at a piano and just glorified in how amazing he is for what he just created. He did not do that. If they stayed true to Freddie's real life story, it would have been so much better. So much of his life was altered or left out and it would have been such a good movie if they focused on everything they glossed over or changed, it would have been a much better movie and represented him in a much better light. I hope they do a true to life biopic on freddie that isn't such a travesty. I love you dearly, Freddie. Wish I could have seen you once in person. Queen opened their tour recently near me, and I thought about it, but just can't bring myself to watch a Queen concert without Freddie in it.
Freddie Mercury had many things going for him, but I would never call him a good looking guy.
I was unimpressed with the movie. Freddie was bisexual and hypersexual. He was wealthy and popular. He was failed by a health system unprepared to deal with AIDS. Listen to Brian May's album Back To The Light. It deals with the loss of Freddie, his depression, his divorce and his recovery.
I enjoyed the movie and feel happy with some artistic licence to create a better story. Freddie wasn't a saint and movies need to be entertaining. Favourite bit was him walking out of the clinic at night:- way-oh!
It isn't the public's opinion I would care about but the people who knew him and were portrayed in the film. If they are good with it then so am I. It they are not, I won't ever watch any of it again. I haven't seen the whole movie, because it makes me sad to think Freddie is gone.
"It's a biopic that is 90% made up and none of the critics seem fit to mention this." Every review I read mentioned this so it was common knowleldge to me, someone who doesn't care about Queen, nor this film which I've never seen. Basically Brian May took over the story and made the film in a way that made him look better or something to that effect. Also that it won the Oscar for best editing but the editing is actually hilariously bad. lmao
Armageddon was probably the most watched movie from the 90s and everyone hates it because Hollywood magic doesn't explain science.
Screw you guys, that movie is fantastic and I have multiple science degrees that don't care
Anyone watching movies and asking for scientific reality deserves to be disappointed. People need to relax and just be entertained
As someone whose country’s main cinematic contribution is a wildly successful series of movies about hobbits, I don’t believe for one moment that lack of realism on its own causes widespread dislike of a movie. If this movie has ACTUALLY fallen out of favour, as opposed to just being roasted by science geeks, there’s another reason.
Load More Replies...This movie is GOLD! It is what it is and it's not trying to be any more than a fun romp about the end of the world ... I love it!
I love the movie, it's pure entertainment. I don't need scientific accuracy in movies, it's fiction, not a documentary. This is the kind of s**t my father in law loves to do- every time we go to a movie he nitpicks everything.
It's like Indiana Hones, he does a lot of things that are so not archaeological correct but all archeologists (me included) love it and we don't care if it ain't correct, they are great movies!
I still watch this at least once a year. I still cry at least once a year.
Movies are supposed to be about suspending disbelief and I've never had a problem doing that for Armageddon. Favorite part is when the astronomer tells his wife to get his contact book and she asks "Do I look like your god damn slave?" "Get the book! Get the book! Get the book!" 😆
Avatar. I don’t know if would say hated, but I do feel more people are saying it’s overrated today than they did when it came out
Always thought of it as an overly-long, boring take on the "white savior" trope.
Don't forget the blatent poke at the US invading for oil.
Load More Replies...I love the original Avatar, but the Way of the Water? I fell asleep 20 minutes in, caught the end, and didn't care. I tried to watch again on HBO and it was again a literal snoozefest. So I Still haven't watched it, and don't care to. Sad because I was SO EXCITED for it to come out. I think James Cameron would have been better off making 2 or 3 more sequels rather than writing all these years and cramming them all into one movie. Everything I can't wait to see ends up being a dud.
From the moment they announced the sequel, I said it was too late. The moment was gone. I have no interest in it this late in the game.
Load More Replies...Nah, it was literally the entire plot of Fern Gully but made for adults
Load More Replies...It was a great use of 3D and CGI but other than that, the film/story were just meh
The original Avatar was either "Dances with Wolves" or "Pocahontas" (take your pick) with better VFX.
Load More Replies...And they are making 2 more sequals. Look at all the great scifi out there they could turn into movies or tv series. Where is Larry Niven's Known Space or Ringworld?
It was massively overrated. It looked pretty, but that was it. Terrible story that was a complete copy of better movies that came before. It was so repetitive it wasn't even particularly fun to watch.
Well, technically a show not a movie, but from what I hear the ending of Game of Thrones basically f****d itself into oblivion and now no one talks about it anymore.
The Red Wedding and The Battle of the Bastards will live in my memory as the best ever. Really alot of awesome moments. I don't hate GoT, I just hate how they caved to pressure and put costs over creativity at the final season and ruined it.
Both of those scenes I fast forward through every time, lol. Too stressful to watch. My favorite moments are Arya sparring with Brienne, Arya taking out the Freys, all of Danny's victories and Arya taking out Little Finger. Looks like Arya has some of the best scenes of that show.
Load More Replies...GoT was the greatest series ever until.....it literally took a s**t with its trousers on.
Truly a show of the highest highs and some really deep lows. The greatest series ever...until it wasn't, because of ego and stupidity.
Me, a newborn photographer, thinking of all the parents that named their baby girls Khalesi before season 8 aired...
I stopped watching after Joffrey got killed. I really just wanted to watch that MFer die but that show was so gruesome and disturbing that it gave me nightmares (which I already deal with on a near nightly basis but rats chewing through a burning bucket until they get to human flesh still disturbs me)
You missed some of the best TV ever made. The mid seasons were awesome
Load More Replies...HBO released the viewing figures of their shows during C*vid. Literally no one was re-watching this show. All the others…people were binge, and comfort watching other shows, and series over, and over…but not GoT.
What I hated the most about GoT was how Daenerys was hyped as this "relatable, strong female character" and that only the last season "ruined her". The writing of her character deteriorated much earlier imo. Her thought process basically reduced to "I want to sit on the throne" and never went beyond what she wanted to do once she got that far. Her murdering people that got in her way started way earlier than the last season, but I guess it was ok as long as it wasn't an entire city
GoT is in fact a series about i_n_c_e_s_t, r_a_p_e and child abuse. And no, no amount of bulls$itting how 13yro was a woman in middle ages change that. Because 1. it is not set in middle ages so is not factual and 2. ebven then people lived waaaay up till 70-80, and short life expectancy is due to how statistics work and high newborn death rate, not actually all population suddenly dying at 30.
I haven’t seen anyone mention Captain Philips yet. Apparently the real life guy was warned to take a much wider berth around the Horn of Africa specifically bc of the threat of pirates, but he wanted to save time and ope! What do you know, there were pirates! Apparently the crew was pissed the movie made him look like such a hero when the situation was basically his fault.
He worked for a corporation that prized profit over safety. In other words, just about all of them. They were willing to take a risk that didn't affect them directly and probably figured that if something bad happened, well that's what insurance is for. Get it there, Cap'n!
This has one of my favorite Hanks performances and the scene towards the end where the shock finally hits him is astounding.
Good thing Tom Hanks is here to rehabilitate his image.
Load More Replies...
Debbie Does Dallas.
On reflection, she really didn't do ALL of Dallas, so I have to ding it for lack of truth in advertising.
Yep, Ya gotta applaud the effort at least. There is only so much a gal can do in 90 minutes.
Load More Replies...That was hilarious! Especially loved the monster in the closet, attacking all of Debbie's guests, one by one. ;)
Load More Replies...Population of Dallas - just under 1.3 million. How long a movie do you want?
It wasn't dallas the city, it was dallas Campbell from off the telly
Load More Replies...She did not do ANY of Dallas. She and her friends were trying to raise money to send her to Dallas. You need to rewatch.
And because of her age at the time of the making of the movie, it is classified as child porn.
I don't think you have any clue what you are talking about.
Load More Replies...
The Blind Side
I never liked the Tuohys and I only saw them as portrayed in that movie. They remind me of the Chrisleys. Just so over-the-top southern and fake and all about money and image. I recently watched them in real life on the tv specials covering their fraud. I knew they rubbed me the wrong way for a reason, and that was the fictional portrayal.
But the sad part is that people are getting mad at Sandra Bullock for being in the movie. It was a movie people, she is an actress. She was excellent in her role. Lighten up.
Still, great quotes: "Yes, and it shoots just fine every other day of the week, too!"
I've never seen this film because the basic premise was so obviously insulting and demeaning. Come to find out, a lot of it wasn't just Hollywood BS but BS, in general.
Song of the South won Oscars and had one of the most iconic Disney songs in the last half of the 20th Century. Now Disney has more or less scrubbed it completely from availability.
Because they know it is racist is the reason why they haven't released it in the US. It has been available in other countries. [ In 2017, after being inaugurated as a Disney Legend, Whoopi Goldberg expressed a desire for Song of the South to be re-released publicly to American audiences and stated, "I'm trying to find a way to get people to start having conversations about bringing Song of the South back, so we can talk about what it was and where it came from and why it came out".] wiki....And the books are still available. Racism is racism and history is history, the past can't be changed. Only the future.
"The past can't be changed. Only the future." is literally one of the best thigns I"ve read.
Load More Replies...Funny thing, in Song of the South, all the black characters are smart/wise and all the white characters, with the possible exception of the grandmother, are idiots. It is only when they listen to Uncle Remus that the white characters have a chance of behaving intelligently.
I think Warner handled their racist stuff quite well. This warning was placed on releases of cartoons with racist depictions of black and Asian folks. EbsyUgsU4A...7f23a7.jpg
Correct. However, they still haven't released the Censored 11 on DVD, which are basically 11 Looney Tunes shorts that feature black racist stereotypes and much like Song of the South, have not been broadcast on TV in decades. You can still find copies online on the internet though.
Load More Replies...The movie is not nearly as racist as most people think. Really, it got its reputation from people who never saw it in the first place, and keeps being repeated by people who have never seen it. That said, it's an awful movie that is terribly boring and absolutely not worth the time.
The NAACP protested it when it was initially released.
Load More Replies...If Disney were smart, they would release this on DVD and Blu-Ray exclusively through the Disney Movie Club for one year and limit copies to 3 per member, that way it would finally be available, anyone who wants a copy can get one (would also boost membership in the Club) and all of those extra copies can show up on eBay for $1K in a year.
Because it's wildly racist, and it blows my mind that some people lament the fact that it's been shelved because nostalgia, I guess? I'm sorry, there are plenty of things to be nostalgic about that don't involve blatant racism.
My parents still tell the story about how they tried to take baby me to this as my first time in a movie theater. Had to leave after 15 minutes because I wouldn’t stop asking “why is that guy brown?”
American Beauty. I think when it first came out it received a lot of positive attention but these days it's perceived very differently.
That movie was so...awkward and hard to watch. And that was with my husband. I can't imagine watching it with my parents or something. So weird. Kevin Spacey creeps me out so much.
Then the movie makers succeeded. Kevin Spacey's character was *supposed* to creep you out.
Load More Replies...I totally disagree with this one as well. It was a great movie and it still is. If you can't separate the art from the artist, then I've got some really bad news about every song released, just as starters.
Yeah y’all are wrong, American Beauty is a classic. Quit white washing history and try to see a piece of art for what it is…Art
Love this movie, and Kevin spacey’s performance. Sometimes talented people are also terrible people
The most unrealistic part is that Kevin Spacey's character wasn't actually sleeping with the teenage boy next door.
Argo pretty much ignores all the backstory US had in Iran and makes Iranians look like a bunch of bloodthirsty people that hate Americans for no good reason and the Americans seem like some innocent bureaucrats caught in a bad situation.
In reality the US overthrew the Mohammad Mosaddegh government and installed a Shah that they had close relationships with. The US then played a critical role in founding the Shah's brutal secret police to keep him in power.
In the late 1970s the Iranian Revolution occurred and the Shah was overthrown. This Shah held a grip on power for over 25 years with US backing against the will of the people. As part of the revolution, pro-revolution students stormed the US embassy.
This comment, like the movie, fully ignores Canada's role in orchestrating and executing the rescue. I hate American revisionist history.
Came here to say that. And that was one of the first things we learned in school in the 80's was that Canada was awesome because of this. Married a Canadian, can confirm - Canada is still awesome. And not just for All Dressed chips, either. Wait, what?
Load More Replies...And all for access to oil that the Mossaddegh government was going to make property of the state. The Shah continued to allow foreign oil companies to drill and pump and keep their profits. The people of Iran were experiencing a good economy and ample social programs to help those in need under Mossaddegh. Under the Shah they lived in abject poverty and suffering to support the lavish lifestyle of the Shah and his family. However, the US wasn’t the only country at fault, we were just the biggest and most noticeable, and had the loudest oil company executives chiming in with the rest. Read up on the history of the oil industry. Depending on where you’re from, you will be horrified at what you learn about your own country’s contribution, in addition to all the evil s**t done by all of the countries involved.
The Mosaddegh govt was about as legit as the Shah. He was from a council that less than 5% of Iranians could vote for. It was the rich elites who backed his coupe, and he and hos cronies were profiting worse than the Shah when they took over. We just swapped one corrupt govt for another one, but one we liked.
Hollywood has been complicit in re-writing history for a very long time. The first proclaimed "blockbuster" was the white supremacist Birth of a Nation. In between there are a lot of westerns that criminally portray Native Americans as sub-human and deserving of the genocide the expanding nation dealt them. This "the victor writes the history" claptrap is also taught in schools.
Ken Taylor’s role was minimized and John and Zena Sheardown, who risked their lives to shelter the Americans, weren’t even mentioned. Instead, it focused on some very questionable antics from a cia contractor who was peripheral to what really happened at best.
So you're mad because * checks notes* a Hollywood movie isn't historically accurate. Let me go get you some pearls you can clutch.
The Force Awakens. When it came out, the sentiment was overwhelmingly "Starwars is back" but in hindsight it really doesnt hold up at all
We expected (and rightly so) a progression in the story but, in reality, Disney just reshot A New Hope.
I am a huge Star Wars fan and I don't dislike The Force Awakens. It's not great, but it's nowhere near the s**t show that was The Last Jedi. That was a horrible movie with one amazing fight scene and nothing else. Then Skywalker.... TFA was the best of all three, even though they played it really safe
Load More Replies...There was so much that could have been used. Finn could have been the model for deprogramming all the storm troopers to break the First Order. Snoke could have been like the shark from Jaws - an evil menace that threatens everyone in the background. Kylo Ren was basically Psycho meets Darth Vader with daddy issues. And Rey could have been Luke Skywalker but totally not related to anyone because the galaxy is a big place! But instead we got Magic Force Flying Powers Princess in that absolute turd of a second film. So now since then the real big evil in all the Star Wars content is bureaucracy and it sucks.
Eh, I think it is the third movie that was the complete turd. TLJ was my favorite of the trilogy. At least it tried to do different things, even if it didn't always succeed. TFA was a complete copy and TROS copied scenes while ruining everything that came before.
Load More Replies...I love TLJ. I enjoy TFA. TROS is the only Star Wars movie I hate. To each their own. But to me bringing back Palpatine retroactively ruins Vader's sacrifice and the whole thrust of ROTJ.
Load More Replies...That's what you get when you let di$ney take control of a franchise.
Disappointed ☹️ they had soooooooo much to work with freaking people pick up a Star wars book it's not hard and maybe read it and used that instead of the movie dribble
Sorry, Legends books were never, ever canon. Of course they were going to do their own thing and not just adapt Legends books. Lucas himself made it clear all along that the EU wasn't ever canon. A lot of fans just ignored that. I actually love the EU (at least until TNJO ruined things). But it was never canon.
Load More Replies...
Supersize me.
That lying piece of s**t.
I used this movie in college for a paper regarding the method errors used and all the things he doesn't account for in the "testing" he was doing.
I was required to watch this movie for health in 9th grade. Gotta love the American Education System...
I remember having to watch this in high school Health class (I'm 26, so....). Anyway, it was interesting to watch but a bit useless in that kind of class, in my opinion
I am speaking for myself here, and don't know if this view is widely held, but Gravity is an absolute turkey and seems to have got by on the strength of its visuals alone. No real plot and absolutely HONKING script.
The female astronaut acted like she was an intern who had had two months training. She should have been confident, level-headed, and extremely knowledgeable and skilled. Instead she came off like a shrinking violet, more like showing, "Hey, this is a ditzy, silly female would barely manage to handle this situation." Very bad writing and directing when it came to her character. (I thought Bullock acted well with what she was given.) Also, this is NOT the type of movie that should get a pass for bad science. And it did have bad science in many ways.
As someone who watches Air Crash Investigation and has watched reenactments of real (male!) pilots breaking down in terror after a near-death experience, I am 100% fine with a movie saying “astronauts get scared when they’re in a life-threatening situation and the odds of surviving are slim”. And yes, I’m a woman.
Load More Replies...I totally disagree with this one. I really enjoyed the movie and still do.
To me, this is pretty much the same as Avatar. A great, entertaining spectacle with a bare bones story. Still fun, though.
My comment on Armageddon fits here. Beautiful movie but, oh, as someone in the business, it was painful to watch. Wrote four blog posts on why it was impossible to get the bother out of my brain.
Hated it from the moment I first saw it. The physics is ALL wrong. Every scene. It took me a while to realise that the incredible stupidity of Gravity was deliberate. It ought to have been released with a laughter track, like Waterworld.
I thought it was so, so, so boring. I kept waiting for it to get exciting but, it just never did for me.
If you have no idea how gravity really works, don't name your movie after it.
Milo & Otis (1986)
At the time, it was the third highest-grossing film *ever* in Japan. It won the 1987 award for Most Popular Film at The Japanese Academy, was released in English in 1989, did well at the box office ($257 million box office in Japan and the United States; over 12 million theater tickets sold worldwide), and received generally favorable reviews.
Then came the animal abuse allegations.
I adored that movie as a child and now can never watch it again because that's all I see. As I got older, I would worry if the kitten hurt his eyes when he popped out of a sooty chimney, or was terrified when they filmed the river scene. You can tell it's a hot tub not a river, but that is still a real kitten nearly drowning in the rapids. Milo is terrified in that box. They could have just had meowing sounds coming from it and not actually put a real kitten downriver in a cardboard box.
Imagine being so empty inside, that you actually mistreat animals in order to give people a 'happy' story.
Load More Replies...I hated that movie even before the abuse came out. I hated how it turned out. Otis risked everything to rescue Milo, and Milo basically said, "Whatever." Cats may be more independent than dogs, but they still love their people and their dogs. It felt like the writers didn't know cats, and were just writing off stereotypes. Then, when I found out what really happened to those poor animals onset, I understood. Now, it's the very antithesis of a sweet kids' movie.
When the film was released, some animal welfare organizations alleged to have had a number of complaints from people who had seen the film and were concerned that it could not have been made without cruelty.[19] The Tasmanian and Victorian branches of the RSPCA also alleged abuse.[20] The film was reported to have the approval of the American Humane Society.[19] The American Humane Association attempted to investigate cruelty rumors through "contacts in Europe who normally have information on movies throughout the world." While noting that the contacts had also heard the allegations, they were unable to verify them. The organization also reported, "We have tried through humane people in Japan, and through another Japanese producer to determine if these rumors are true, but everything has led to a dead end." The same report noted that several Japanese Humane Societies allowed their names to be used in connection with the film and that the film "shows no animals being injured or harmed.
I want to say The Last Jedi. For the first two weeks after release it was coasting on hype, with lots of critics describing it with the usual buzz-words: that it was “bold” and “creative” (which is why those words have become red-flags nowadays). I saw comments from audiences coming fresh out of the theater claiming that it was “the greatest Star Wars movie ever made, even better than The Empire Strikes Back!”
Then the hype died off fast and those same audiences started realizing they had issues with it. I started to see more and more complaints, things like how the payoffs set up by the Force Awakens were unsatisfying, and it killed off potential storylines for the next film by killing off Snoke before he was explained, killing off Luke before he could really do much, killing off Phasma before her rivalry with Finn could reach its zenith, and leaving the Resistance with only a handful of survivors.
With the exception of "better than ESB", the sentiment and comments in that first paragraph still ring true for me. I think it's a brilliant film, I thought Luke was given a wonderful ending (before the "Mark Hamill hated it" people come in, he never expressed "hate", and he has walked back those comments). With all the other criticisms in this post, to me it felt like trimming the fat, and what we had at the end of that film was a completely fresh slate, which we had never had before in Star Wars. It was all so promising, and then it was all brought crashing down in the next film: "THE DEAD SPEAK!..."
This - I think killing off Phasma was the only big misstep. I think it was excellent at paring the story down to the new core characters. The third did nothing to tie off the first two together, was truly lazy writing, and had giant unexplained jumps in the story (sudden return of Palpatine and Rey and Kylos relationship and Kylos unearned journey to the light side, etc), the disservice to Finn and Rose. It was just terrible and even the fan service moments were largely a failure
Load More Replies...Maybe it's an unpopular opinion, but I'll always prefer bold, surprising, unique stories, albeit controversial, over the bland fanservice Dave Filoni & John Favreau are doing recently. I agree with one thing though, Finn deserved better.
I do prefer stories that are actually bold, surprising and unique but sadly if you only get those buzzwords you'll find the actual movie itself is none of it. Bold usually means it ignores tons of plotholes and destroys everything people ever liked, surprising means the storyline makes no sense and is all over the place with irregular pacing and unique is code for the characters do things no one in their right mind would ever do that lead nowhere but all of a sudden they succeed with no real reason.
Load More Replies...Rouge one was awesome we need more star wars like that one the last Jedi was c**p with lazy writing read the books building up to a different story those were great 👍😃
The 1st three films, hope ,empire and return were brilliant (along with rouge one) but the rest were c**p
Yeah all the Ren movies are sheet. Nobody was fooled, people just like to eat garbage. Get over it.
Mainly BP trolls and bots that downvote daily. It is really odd. Gotta be time consuming. Been happening all year.
Shakespeare in Love
Total s**t movie that should have been panned and never have been in the running for—-and winning, ffs!—-the Oscar! Should’ve won a Razzie.
I have to admit that it's one of my guilty pleasures. Is it good? Not really. Do I still love it? 👍
Load More Replies...I quite liked it but could never accept that GP won best actress. She was up against Cate Blanchett, ffs.
It was a decent movie, but c'mon- Saing Private Ryan was also nominated, along with La Vita e Bella, Thin Red Line and Elizabeth- and each one of those was better, so I consider it a stolen Oscar
It was funny in parts, and well done with a good ensemble cast but that's about it. Much as I love Judy Dench, how she won an Oscar for 5 minutes of screen time and a dozen lines is beyond me.
I think this movie got more flack than it deserved simply because it beat out others at some c**p awards show. Taking it at face value, I thought it was hugely entertaining, funny and a moving final performance.
I hate award shows…they’re all just popularity contests. And these multimillionaires who need to pat themselves on the back and get one vapid award after another is revolting.
Last tango in Paris used to be hailed as a masterpiece until the actress spilled the beans about how scummy Brando and the director were
This is oddly the only scene I remember from the whole movie.
Load More Replies...AAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!! Just hearing the name of this movie makes me want to unalive something!!! The director didn't gaf about the fact that he arranged to have an innocent human being seeexuuually asssaulted as long as he got the desired results on film. And the male actor that had no problem perpetrating this crime should of went to jail! That poor poor girl 😢
Pretentious, boring and don't get me started on Brando. That ah should have gone into oblivion way before he did. Even in his glory days of A Steetcar, l never saw an ounce of quality in him, but he acted like he had invented acting.
For a while there, Bird Box was hot s**t and THE movie that everyone had to see. Now it seems like most everyone thinks it's stupid
Thought it was stupid when I first heard about it, so I never wasted my time watching it. Most of what is being produced these days is s**t. It might be popular now, but that doesn’t mean it will become a classic. It means it will most likely age like milk.
Same list telling you American Beauty is sheet. Yes it’s just like Bird Box and the force awakens
Load More Replies...That was 2 horrible hours I'll never get back. "The Silence" was much better
The book is much better. The premise is still ridiculous but the book takes much more time and things tend to make much more sense than they're protrayed in the film. Obviously, books are a different medium and can't always be translated perfectly to film but the story would've been much better as a limited series.
Wasn't American Sniper critically acclaimed until they found out the guy made a bunch of it up?
I haven't heard anything about that and neither has Google, apparently (although I didn't dig too deep). The book A Million Little Pieces and its sequel My Friend Leonard were completely falsified by James Frey and anyone who bought a copy got their money back.
What does that have to do with American Sniper? No one asked about a million little pieces.
Load More Replies...Damn it writers, publishers, and producers! Before you write that novel, script, or screenplay about an actual event, then make it into a movie, how about verifying whether or not the storyteller is lying! Fact check the f**k out of everything, before you write it down and present it to the public. Most people are too stupid to realize they’re watching a lie, and will accept it as the truth.
All stories sold as “based on true events” are still fiction. I’m sick of ppl accepting whatever Oppenheimer or the Imitation Game, or any biopic showed as if it were unvarnished history.
Load More Replies...He lied about a lot of things, but he was clearly not a great person regardless. Even if If he was telling the truth, his response to almost any situation he didn't like was to murder those involved. In fact, almost all his lies were claiming to kill more people than he actually did., He claimed to murder 30 people for looting, for example. That was an obvious lie, but imagine that being a brag for someone?
The fake baby that B-Coop dandles is the American Sniper we had inside us the whole time.
I've been told on high authority by someone who knew him during that time that he's a total fraud.
He kept leaving his family to go back to war...he didn't go straight home but to a bar when he did come home. He nearly killed his son's dog at a birthday party. And his solution to helping soldiers with PTSD, among other issues, was to put them on a shooting range, with lots of gunfire. Oh, and he defied orders to get the next kill, even though he nearly got his whole team killed becUse the noise brought the enemy to their location. Yeah, the movie didn't do that great a job, if you paid attention. However, I still cried at the end. A lot of people loved him, and they lost someone they loved.
I've read that the movie portrayed him very differently from his book. In the movie he was more conflicted about what he did, but in the book he basically bragged about it and had way less of a conscience. Granted, I've only heard/read this; I didn't read the book or watch the movie.
somehow the tide turned on *Gone with the Wind* and people are unwilling to admit the plain fact that it is one of the greatest movies of all time by any measurable metric. Sad state of things really.
Yeah, those generations don't include almost anyone born in the past 25-30 years. Those people just paint it as racist/misogynistic trash that needs to be forever erased less someone, somewhere suffers the terrible fate of being uncomfortable with things they don't even attempt to grasp.
Load More Replies...Rhett Butler was a repugnant character. He raped Scarlett but this was conveniently glossed over & he was portrayed as suave & sexy. Ugh.
And Scarlett was supposed to be feisty, but to me she just came off as a spoiled child that threw tantrums
Load More Replies...Gone with the Wind is a great movie. It is also confederate revisionist history justifying the enslavers of the American South. Both of those things are true at the same time and the movie should be watched but critically.
I always wished that it had ended at its intermission, when all the formerly rich slave holders are out in a field grubbing for any kind of food they can find. But then, I was always a sucker for happy endings.
Its a brillant movie, the criticism is how it whitewashes slavery and the old south. But it was brilliant
So was "Triumph of the Will", for those who enjoy double features.
Load More Replies...Gone with the Wind is a wonderful feat of storytelling. The problem is with the story itself—an inaccurate and racist interpretation of history.
"Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it" - George Santayana
And those that do learn history are doomed to watching others repeat it.
Load More Replies...This movie would have been two hours shorter if Scarlett and Rhett had had even one honest conversation.
Blue is the warmest colour
was critically acclaimed for being a queer movie in an industry where there were very few.
then it turned out the director dude made it a nightmare for the leads to work in it. and this is not an unpopular opinion anymore, but the explicit scenes in the movie come across as p**n, and tbh it comes off a more hyper sexualised depiction of lesbians than celebration of a lesbian love story.
I loved this movie when it came, seeing women partly my age (I didn't age as fast as they did with time jumps after all :P) be so free with each other. I did think some sex scenes were over the top, but all in all, I left the movie feeling happy. Then came the reports of that f*****g director and I will be unable to ever watch it again. I still enjoy the graphic novel, though.
The sex scene was way over the top and the director's behaviour heavily problematic, but I like the lead actresses.
Crash - the Paul Haggis one.
Good one. I always hated this movie and never understood why it was acclaimed.
It was mainly a string of unfunny racist jokes. I think they were trying to make the audience laugh, then make them stop and think that maybe they shouldn't be laughing. But I found it all painful to watch, not remotely believable or relatable, and completely unfunny.
Load More Replies...I was so mad this won the Oscar that year. I felt it was HIGHLY overrated. It's full of stereotypes and one-dimensional performances.
Lone Survivor. Or at least it should be hated. The only accurate part of that movie is that 3 SEALs died and Marcus was rescued by Mohammad Gulab and the Rangers/PJs. Everything else is utter b******t.
Navy SEALs in the public eye have a massive history of exaggeration and blatant lying and Marcus Luttrell is no different.
Frankly, I don’t blame them. Making $60-80k a year for a job that you’re highly likely to get killed/maimed doing that carries a 95% probability of imploding your personal life; all for a government that f***s it’s vets over at every opportunity? Go for it - lie your a*s off and make your millions.
It is sad that there is so much more this country should be doing for its veterans, but instead we need charity organizations to fill the gaps. What is truly sad is that this country still treats its vets a thousand times better than the majority of the rest of the world.
I don't blame the SEALs the movie was based on; even if they told the unvarnished truth Hollywood would have changed the details (e.g., the Freddie Mercury biopic) to make for a "better" story.
The Birth of a Nation
I initially thought of the 1915 film when I saw these words...which also fits this thread
Me too. Wow, talk about revisionist history. Taking a novel called “The Clansman” of all things, then letting the son of an ex-confederate soldier direct the movie adaptation of it, is definitely a recipe for bringing the KKK back out from under its rock—-and so brazenly out in the open it would be bold enough to organize a huge parade down Pennsylvania Avenue ten years later. Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?
Load More Replies...That movie is a product of its time. We should judge it as such. A movie children today could learn about the ideas of 1915 from.
Well, the 1915 film wasn't that bad, at least compared to some of the things airing in Nazi Germany a few decades later.
Traffic (2000) won **4 Oscars** and had a 93% RT score.
Watched it recently... it's like a really preachy and flat episode of Narcos. IDK if it's "hated" today, but it seems pretty much forgotten. The other big acclaimed films that year (*Gladiator, Almost Famous, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, Erin Brockovich*) had a lot more staying power.
It's funny how someone denigrates traffic for a later TV series (15 years later, no less) that was modeled on the movie
the film is based on a British mini-series from 1989 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffik
Load More Replies...Traffic is a fantastic movie! The cinematography alone makes it a fascinating watch but then match it with each story line bringing the true nature of the drug trade into one narrative? Readers, if you haven't watched it go watch it. And out of the other 4 movies mentioned, Erin Brockovich is the only one that's actually worth its salt.
i thought catherine zeta jones was amazing in that film...i also like benecio deltoro
Green Book
Tell us why you dislike it? I am melanin deprived, so I might not have understood. I did grow up in the Civil Rights Era, and my parents were evolved, if that makes any difference.
I was disappointed by this movie. I was expecting to learn more about the actual green book and the effect it had on artists, but that was only really covered in one part of the film, most of it was given up to yet another white guy redemption story. Reminded me a bit of 'The Help', which was enjoyable, but I think everyone wanted to read the actual book, not the making of the book.
I don't think people dislike this film because of the film itself, more the ridiculousness of it winning Best Picture.
This list is strange to me. I'm confused at how people don't like a film because stuff in it wasn't true. I mean, these are all works of fiction, so there is always going to be artistic license. Sometimes it's a little, sometimes it's a lot. I could understand hate for documentaries that tell lies, but not fiction, especially now that, if you find a "based on/inspired by" film particularly interesting, the internet is right there for you to read up on it.
American Sniper. Chris Kyle was not a hero. He was an epic d0uchebag who lied about the number of medals he received, lied about punching Jesse Ventura (who sued Kyle’s estate and won), bragged about killing civilians, lied about shooting looters during Hurricane Katrina, lied about finding chemical weapons in Iraq, said killing people was “fun” and that he “loved” it, and then was murdered after deciding it was just a great idea to bring a guy with schizophrenia and PTSD to a shooting range. ‘Merica, f#ck yeah!
Gigi. I loved that movie so much when I was young. Now, I can't watch it. The scenery, the costumes, the accents, the songs! All beautiful. But the story? Oh my gosh so cringe.
I feel the same way. It's so problematic how her family is basically prostituting her.
Load More Replies...One I really hated was Birdman. Such a pretentious film full of Hollywood navel gazing. I love Michael Keaton but I can't stand that film. And I don't think it deserved the Best Picture Oscar.
I was most upset by 2021 version of The Stand. I know it's not a movie, but I adore that book and the original 1994 miniseries is amazing. The new one is just abysmal. They butchered everything and made it so much worse. It could have been great. I waited all through covid for it and it was a trainwreck. The casting was just WTF and they changed all the characters main likeable traits from the book. There was absolutely no reason to destroy the timeline and cut out most of the book. They could have changed the setting to current and just added to what was already there. That was such a bummer and still is.
Gonna need to make room for about 25 dogsheet MCU movies. Every one of them will age like guacamole set out about 1 hour too early.
This list is strange to me. I'm confused at how people don't like a film because stuff in it wasn't true. I mean, these are all works of fiction, so there is always going to be artistic license. Sometimes it's a little, sometimes it's a lot. I could understand hate for documentaries that tell lies, but not fiction, especially now that, if you find a "based on/inspired by" film particularly interesting, the internet is right there for you to read up on it.
American Sniper. Chris Kyle was not a hero. He was an epic d0uchebag who lied about the number of medals he received, lied about punching Jesse Ventura (who sued Kyle’s estate and won), bragged about killing civilians, lied about shooting looters during Hurricane Katrina, lied about finding chemical weapons in Iraq, said killing people was “fun” and that he “loved” it, and then was murdered after deciding it was just a great idea to bring a guy with schizophrenia and PTSD to a shooting range. ‘Merica, f#ck yeah!
Gigi. I loved that movie so much when I was young. Now, I can't watch it. The scenery, the costumes, the accents, the songs! All beautiful. But the story? Oh my gosh so cringe.
I feel the same way. It's so problematic how her family is basically prostituting her.
Load More Replies...One I really hated was Birdman. Such a pretentious film full of Hollywood navel gazing. I love Michael Keaton but I can't stand that film. And I don't think it deserved the Best Picture Oscar.
I was most upset by 2021 version of The Stand. I know it's not a movie, but I adore that book and the original 1994 miniseries is amazing. The new one is just abysmal. They butchered everything and made it so much worse. It could have been great. I waited all through covid for it and it was a trainwreck. The casting was just WTF and they changed all the characters main likeable traits from the book. There was absolutely no reason to destroy the timeline and cut out most of the book. They could have changed the setting to current and just added to what was already there. That was such a bummer and still is.
Gonna need to make room for about 25 dogsheet MCU movies. Every one of them will age like guacamole set out about 1 hour too early.
