Woman Gets Rejected From Job Application After The First Question, Decides To Test The Process
Looking for a new job can be lengthy and tiring. You’ve got to make sure your resume is immaculate. Then there’s the search itself, and, if you’re lucky, the assessment tests, and then, finally, the interview. Some companies try to simplify the process by automating it. They start the application process with a simple questionnaire that should filter out applicants faster.
But when you’re hit with a ‘Thank you for your interest’ after the very first question, how would that make you feel as an applicant? Especially when the question doesn’t have anything to do with your qualifications. This woman was overqualified for her prospective job, but the automated application system rejected her after the very first question. Confused about whether that’s the standard in today’s job market, she shared her story with others.
Job hunting can be an arduous and exhausting process
Image credits: KATRIN BOLOVTSOVA / Pexels (not the actual photo)
This woman applied for a job where she exceeded the qualifications, but she got rejected for another absurd reason
Image credits: Polina Zimmerman / Pexels (not the actual photo)
Image credits: ColeyPickles
Image credits: Porapak Apichodilok / Pexels (not the actual photo)
People might have employment gaps more often than we think
The woman in this story took a one-year break after 10 years of working in retail banking. She had a full-fleshed career for a decade, but because she took a gap year to travel, she was suddenly deemed ineligible for the job by the automated application system. As it turns out, gaps in one’s career are actually not that uncommon.
A survey commissioned by ethical hiring company Applied and social enterprise Women Returners and done by Censuswide revealed that one in three people take breaks in their career, both planned or unplanned. Many people also said they think gaps in employment can harm their careers and that they lied to recruiters in fear of not getting the job.
The Censuswide survey also showed that women are three times more likely to have career gaps. As the OP and some people in the comments pointed out, such a question about “loyalty” can be discriminatory, especially against women.
The burden of childcare is still disproportionately carried by women, as 38% of women respondents said they have taken six months or longer off work to care for their child. For men, the number was at a mere 11%. Interestingly, more men took career breaks for other reasons: mental and physical health (23%), travel (10%), and applying to other jobs (12%).
Image credits: cottonbro studio / Pexels (not the actual photo)
Gaps in one’s career shouldn’t be grounds for discrimination
The good news is that the attitudes toward people with gaps in their resumes might be changing. The EEOC, which the author of this story quotes in her post, is working to end discrimination toward those who might have breaks in their careers. That includes mothers, older workers, people with mental illness, and previously incarcerated people.
“Almost everything employers ‘know’ about applicants with an employment history gap is wrong,” Attorney Eve Hill said during a virtual roundtable hosted by the EEOC and the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. “It’s time to rethink the assumptions we still carry from the work world of the past, so we can attract the best talent in today’s world.”
Essentially, it’s up to employers and recruiters to end this stigma. Experts advise companies to revise their hiring practices and be willing to hire people with employment gaps. Management consulting firm Stella Pop writes that long lists of desired skills might put perfectly qualified candidates off, so companies shouldn’t be afraid to drop them. “Even the best of the best could find the hoops to jump through not worth their while,” they claim.
The same goes for demands for 5-10 years of experience. The consulting firm points out that this can put off people who don’t have a formal education or the required experience but could excel at the job nonetheless. This rule applies to hiring people with a criminal record. “Evaluate potential new hires based on their skills, experience, and willingness to do the work, not their past,” they write.
Experts during the EEOC and the OFCCP virtual roundtable also said that companies should make such policies known through their marketing. This includes posting photos of older workers on their website and social media or asking a person with a mental illness to start a blog documenting their experiences of working at the organization.
Many people sympathized with her experience and called out the absurd state of the current job market
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
You May Also Like
Woman Refuses To Chip In For Babysitting Because She Doesn’t Even Have Kids, Asks If She’s A Jerk
Do you think childless individuals should be expected to chip in for group babysitting costs during friend gatherings?
“They Saw The Blood Leave My Body”: Woman Refuses To Tip 10% At Bridal Store
How do you feel about the practice of tipping at a bridal store?
17 Y.O. Is Done Sharing Her Birthday With Her Late Twin, Parents Are Not Having It
Do you think the girl should be allowed to celebrate her birthday without the remembrance of her deceased twin?
I had issues following her post. She was a hiring manager and would only have asked the 'are your currently employed and have you been in this role 12 months' question to internal candidates? Why? If they are internal candidates, the answer to the first part of the question is obvious and the answer to the second should be on file. Yes, its probably a typo but it was distracting me from the topic.
That's a function of the way the "application" is set up. It was a pre-screen set up on LinkedIn's website and one of the features is to be able to ask a couple of pre-screening yes/no questions. You can set them to either prefer Yes candidates but still pass along if enough other questions are also yes, or require a definite Yes before moving on. Answering No if they've set it up for a hard Yes ends the pre-screening then & there. Whether it's dumb on a retail job is a different issue.
And then they wonder and complain about the diminishing workforce and how "nobody wants to work". Generally, the people without jobs are the most likely to be looking.
Load More Replies... I had issues following her post. She was a hiring manager and would only have asked the 'are your currently employed and have you been in this role 12 months' question to internal candidates? Why? If they are internal candidates, the answer to the first part of the question is obvious and the answer to the second should be on file. Yes, its probably a typo but it was distracting me from the topic.
That's a function of the way the "application" is set up. It was a pre-screen set up on LinkedIn's website and one of the features is to be able to ask a couple of pre-screening yes/no questions. You can set them to either prefer Yes candidates but still pass along if enough other questions are also yes, or require a definite Yes before moving on. Answering No if they've set it up for a hard Yes ends the pre-screening then & there. Whether it's dumb on a retail job is a different issue.
And then they wonder and complain about the diminishing workforce and how "nobody wants to work". Generally, the people without jobs are the most likely to be looking.
Load More Replies...
42
22