There is nothing more human than being confidently incorrect. We’ve all been guilty of it, giving answers that are completely wrong, or casually citing statistics, facts, and figures that have no bearing on reality.
So one netizen wanted to set the record straight and asked the internet for its favorite often repeated fact that is actually false. People shared all sorts of information that might send you reeling when you realize something you’ve firmly believed as true is a lie. So get comfortable as you scroll through and be sure to upvote your favorites and comment your thoughts below.

This post may include affiliate links.
That you can sweat out "toxins".
You liver and kidney remove toxins from your body. Your sweat glands are physically incapable of "removing toxins"
Also detox pills and such - complete useless (medical active coal aside)
kinoki foot pads! stick some foot shaped maxi pads to the soles of your feet and they will "suck the toxins out". lol
There is a certain amount of urea in sweat, so this isn't strictly true
Yes, a tiny amount. To the extent that the amount is considered 'incidental' and not beneficial - it won't make any difference to your health.
Load More Replies...Those goofy pads you stick to the bottom of your feet that are supposed to 'detox' your body. They do nothing. Instead of the body's toxins being absorbed, detox foot pads turn black as a result of a chemical reaction between the ingredients of the pad and moisture from the feet. They are a total waste of money.
"These components are composed primarily of water but also small amounts of minerals (such as sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium), metabolites (such as lactate, ammonia, and urea), and unmetabolized pharmaceutical drugs." Int J Environ Res Public Health.
People in the Middle Ages thought the Earth was flat. The Greeks had already calculated the radius of the sphere with great precision centuries before.
I don't know anything about it's history, but I do know that there are idiots living right now who believe the earth is flat.
What If, and hear me out here, the Flat Earthers actually don't believe that at all. They're just a bunch of trolls whose joke got out of hand long ago and now they're just rolling with it to see how long they can keep it going.
Load More Replies..."The idea that people in the Middle Ages thought the earth was flat is a canard invented in the Early Modern Period by authors who wanted to portray the Middle Ages as a time of backwardness and superstitious regression. There really was a time when people did believe that the earth was flat, but it was long, long before the Middle Ages. Prior to around 500 BC or thereabouts, it seems most people believed that the earth was flat like a table and that the sky was a dome covering it. This, for instance, seems to have been the worldview of the ancient Sumerians and other early Mesopotamians, the pharaonic Egyptians, and the authors of the Hebrew Bible. The early Greeks believed that the earth was flat too. The prevailing view among the early Greeks seems to have been that the earth was disc-shaped "
"The Iliad and the Odyssey describe the world as flat, with the Underworld lying beneath the ground and Tartaros lying beneath the Underworld. The philosopher Anaximenes of Miletos (lived c. 586 – c. 526 BC) describes the earth in fragment 13.A.6 as “πλατεῖαν μάλα,” which means “very flat.” The philosopher Anaxagoras of Klazomenai (lived c. 510 – c. 428 BC) repeatedly describes the earth in his surviving fragments as “πλατείας,” meaning “flat.” The poet Empedokles of Akragas (lived c. 494 – c. 434 BC) describes the earth in fragment 31.A.56 as “κυκλοτερής,” which means “circular” or “disc-shaped.”
Load More Replies...And the Indians even before. They made a rough guess and put it in various religious texts. Then calculated it around the same time as the Greeks. Not to mention quite a few other ancient civilizations did it too.
Flat Earth is real!!! Everyone around the world knows it true! LOL!
Church is the reason middle ages were so dark and lost from culture and education. Minute education was general, Church lost all followers. Thanks for 2000years of dark brainwashing
Surely it all depends where the people in the Middle Ages were from. Some were educated and some were not.
Many of the “facts” on this list come from Hollywood scriptwriters who absolutely needed something to happen in a scene that wouldn’t work in real life. From CPR to deflators, a lot of emergency medicine doesn’t magically take a dying person from on the brink to breathing and talking within moments.
People also love a “gotcha!” story, hence the weird, ever-present insistence that Albert Einstein failed math, despite this being untrue. It does make for a great story, a misunderstood genius, an evil authority figure, and the idea that being “bad” at math is not a precursor to intellectual failure. Except, of course, Alber Einstein was by no means bad at math.
There is no "24 hour waiting period" on a missing persons report. If someone is missing, even if its for just an hour, you can most certainly file a report.
24 hours is a reasonable amount of time for a healthy adult who has gone missing in non-suspicious circumstances. It's far, far too long to wait if it is a child, a person with dementia, or with major health problems. The police will conduct a risk assessment, and use their judgment as to whether the person is indeed at risk, or whether they have 'gone off for a few days without telling anyone'.
Except in many cases they don't. They allow their own prejudices to interfere. So many missing teenagers are dismissed as runaways with no evidence that they have any reason to runaway. Indigenous women in N America are often dismissed as just 'out partying' even when they have children or a job that they wouldn't just abandon to do drink and drugs. Too many times the default assumption is they're fine and you have to prove otherwise when it would be better to treat the case as if someone is in danger until it's clear they're not.
Load More Replies...The first hours are crucial. If you wait 24 hours, most traces could be lost.
Unfortunately the response to a missing person seemingly often depends on how pretty or close to societal norms the missing person is, last year there was a case in northern England of a 30 something year old mother who went missing whilst walking her dog near a river, the case was all over tv news, radio and newspapers just a couple of hours after she was last seen where it stayed for a couple of weeks, during the same time the sister in law of the actor that played Gareth in the uk version of the office also went missing if memory serves she had learning difficulties and wasn’t as traditionally pretty as the other lady and she received a few column inches on newspaper websites and that was all. Same with madeleine McCann many children go missing every year but the cute blonde girl from well to do and affluent parents is still receiving money to search and media attention some 15-20 years later
Agree about the Madeline McCann situation still receiving money and a lot of police time and certain cases do get more attention but we can't always mistake media interest for police action.
Load More Replies...If they're known to runaway they may delay things but otherwise they will get to it straight away as the first 24 hrs are most important. Always report as soon as possible and let the police work it out from there.
You can file a report, but it's not said that they immediately will take action
that life expectancy several hundred years ago was only 35 or so.
the average age was lower due to incredibly high infant mortality rates. however, if you could survive infancy/childhood, you'd likely live well into your late 50s or 60s.
Impossible to make a determination as ‘several hundred’ could mean 300 or 700 or more and are very different time periods. And the line “if you could survive infancy/childhood, you’d likely live well into your late 50s or 60s is also problematic as it clearly doesn’t take into account deaths from childbirth which in certain eras was very likely, also war, famine, disease, witch trials etc etc
Agreed. And though it's not "several hundred" years ago, take a tour of any late 1800s cemetery in the US. People routinely never lived past their 30s.
Load More Replies...Of you were of the upper echelons of society yes. Otherwise at some time you would die of starvation, war, or some illness
Life expectancy at birth was around 40 or so. However, that was because so infant and juvenile mortality was so high. Life expectancy at the age of 20 was another 40-50 years. That being said, people at 70 were considered to be really old, and were more fragile that 70 year olds today, especially among urban populations, where air and water were polluted, and fresh fruit and vegetables could be expensive of non-existent for much of the year. People of the middle and upper class rural populations were healthier for longer. Of course, dental issues also shortened lives.
Life expectancy rised up once people learned that washing doesn't kill. Thanks again to church for killing medicine for almost 1500 years. Meantime their dirty missionaries killed millions in South and North America, Asia and Africa ... It was God's hand ... Right ... 🤦🏻♂️
But goddamn it was a s****y life. Just work, work, work, more work in horrible conditions. Bad food, disease, coping with the deaths of many of your children, and of course always being terrified of the angry God that was always killing people in clever ways. Life was nasty, brutish, and short. Have a good day everybody, count your blessings.
I do genealogy and most of my ancestors lived into their 70's and 80's. It's the modern part of the tree that is dying younger.
CPR is used to restart hearts and is quite successful. CPR is hugely unsuccessful and isn't used to restart hearts, it's used to keep circulation going until medication to restart the heart can be administered.
A defibrillator is used to restart hearts. Nope again. It's used to stop hearts that are beating incorrectly in the hope that when they restart they'll be beating all nice and proper.
Defibrillators are devices that apply an electric charge or current to the heart to restore a normal heartbeat. If the heart rhythm stops due to cardiac arrest, also known as sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), a defibrillator may help it start beating again. From the National Institutes of Health
What, no. If the heart has stopped, it can't be restarted with a defibrillator. The two shockable rhythms are ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrilation. If asystole or PEA (pulseless electric activity), defibrillation doesn't help.
Load More Replies...Remember, if you need to use CPR, the victim is dead, you can't kill him/her more, the worst thing that you can do is nothing. And it's normal if some ribs are broken during CPR, if the victim survives, it will heal, but if you don't do anything, it doesn't matter if he/she has intact ribs.
As my trainer said, you can live longer with a broken rib than you can with no heartbeat.
Load More Replies...So defibrillator works as "turn it off and on again" then huh I guess this is universal rule to fix everything
The brain only needs 25-30% of the usual oxygen intake to stay alive, so even if the person isn't conscious there is no reason to stop CPR
CPR is used to continuously circulate oxygenated blood to the body tissues until (if) the heart can be started again. Part of a weekly routine for me, unfortunately. But it absolutely works.
In the TV they always restart the heart with a defibrillator if it the monitor shows no heart activity. You can't use the defibrillator if there is nothing happening. You should continue CPR in hopes that medication will save the day.
This is correct. Thank you for bringing this up, I think this info is important to know.
Load More Replies...There is also a strange cottage industry around survival tips that are simply unhelpful, bizarre, or even dangerous. It seems like every single wilderness expert has their own suggestion on what to do if you see a bear, which of course also depends on the type of bear, the time of year, and, presumably, a host of other factors.
Many people believe that eating carbs makes you fat. Carbs don't make you fat, overeating food does.
Too much of anything will make you gain weight. Except water, ig...
Too much water will kill you. It dilutes out all the sodium in your cells. This is very rare, but very dangerous, because it's easy to misdiagnoses - ironically, the symptoms are very similar to dehydration, and obviously the treatment for that would make water toxicity worse.
Load More Replies...Highly processed carbs, breads, cereal, white sugar, etc. are easy to eat in volume, calorically dense, and extremely easy to digest, and thus you get a lot of calorie input, but not very much nutrition, for very little effort. THAT is the problem, not the fact that they are “carbs”. Whole grains and fruit provide the carbohydrates your body NEEDS to survive as well as fiber and micronutrients. Processed foods make you fat, whether it’s a donut or a hotdog.
This one is not completely false. There is more science to it than room to type here but your body processes carbs very much like sugar and especially for highly processed carbs your body is more likely to store the excess calories as fat. Eat your pringles and cheetos if you want but don't lie to yourself that it is the same as a chicken breast and broccoli.
There is no magic rule for everyone. Some people can eat all the carbs they want and have no weight issues. Some people can't - those people may respond better to a ketogenic diet with very few carbohydrates. Perhaps we shouldn't make blanket statements. Read "The Case for Keto" by Gary Taubes, or read accounts of people who live a ketogenic lifestyle. We're all different and should give our bodies the nutrients they want.
Eating a carb-heavy diet does lead to weight gain because your body will store fat instead of burning it for energy since you provide so many carbs to burn for energy. Speaking to a dietician to help curate a diet specifically for your needs.
Carbs, the unprocessed ones or as unprocessed as they can be, are in fact very good for you. Potatoes (as long as you don’t have a food intolerance to them) are a healthy option as long as you don’t fry them in oil or drown them in butter.
The structure of a wolf pack. Contrary to what most people think, there is no alpha, beta, ect. in the pack. Rather, the pack is made up of a family with the mother and father leading, followed by their cubs and later the families of their cubs. After a while the cubs break off from the pack to find their mates and will remain on their own.
IIRC the theory came about from a guy studying wolves in captivity, so not a natural pack, more one that was thrown together. The author of the theory has also renounced it.
Load More Replies...There are "alpha" human males. Alpha in the software development sense - a crude prototype with many bugs to fix and some important features missing.
Perfect description of all those "alpha" male imbeciles!
Load More Replies...The scientist who started the idea of an Alpha male in wolf packs, with his publication on the matter, actually continued studying and found it to actually be false, but when he requested they stop printing his book and he wanted cancelled to prevent continued perpetuation of false information, the publisher actually refused. At least that is what I have seen/heard from various sources.
I feel like the problem here is what common (non-biologist) folks came to think of as "Alpha". The Alpha pair in a wolf pack came first and are the breeding pair. Alpha - as in first letter of the Greek alphabet. As in the bible where it is "I am the alpha and the omega" (the beginning and the end). But common use made it all about "tough guy leader rules by force". Nah, it's just the parents of the wolf pack. == Though an interesting thing I just read is that what pecking order there is - is usually along the sexes. The males pick on the males and the females pick on the females.
St Patrick isn't Irish. He's Welsh.
LOL! S**t Happens! Much love fellow Panda!
Load More Replies...And he ain't a saint. The Roman Catholic Church never canonized him.
*stuffs Patrick in the nearest cannon* Are you happy now?
Load More Replies...*Italian. Sort of. There's a good chance that St. Patrick was from people sent by Rome to England.
Saint Patrick's Day, or the Feast of Saint Patrick (Irish: Lá Fhéile Pádraig, lit. 'the Day of the Festival of Patrick'), is a religious and cultural holiday held on 17 March, the traditional death date of Saint Patrick (c. 385 – c. 461), the foremost patron saint of Ireland.
In a few cases, simple repetition of an outdated fact has done the trick. Once a piece of information is thoroughly embedded in the public consciousness, it becomes very hard to dislodge, it even gains a sort of mythological power where people repeat it, without being able to identify where they first heard it.
Sugar makes kids hyper. It does not
People often confuse sugar with the events where all the kids are allowed to have it, like a birthday party. It's a party just for little kids! That's why they go nutty!
Sugar makes my fiance hyper tho, he'll run around like an idiot when he gets too many sweets. And he's certainly not a kid anymore.
You can easily test this on a childrens party: swap drinks for sugarfree versions and exactly the same happens, and the (unknowing) mothers all swear theyre hyper from the sugar. Also related: in the West we assume alcohol makes people aggressive and that's why so much violence happens; in Japan however people feel it makes you say everything you normally don't dare to; so you get drunk with your boss and colleagues, loudly say everything that's wrong with your department -- and next day there's no consequences, because it was the drink speaking (but a good manager takes the criticism on board!). Point is, the expectations decide the outcome... It's not like your fiance (unlike the kids) can be fooled with a sugarfree version, as an adult you taste the sweeteners.
Load More Replies...I was a ‘70s child — way back in Ye Olden Days we didn’t know about things like ADHD so doctors would just tell parents, “Your kid is hyperactive, stop feeding him sugar.” And call it a day.
Processed Sugar causes a huge amount of insulin to flood the bloodstream. The body thinks all that glucose is accompanied by a ton of fiber that comes in a piece of fruit. So too much insulin burns off the glucose and one ultimately ends up with low blood sugar levels. That creates the hyper nervous feeling. Then the body has to adjust for the low blood sugar by forcing stored glucose out of the liver. The hyper activity is real. But hard to notice in already active kids. Adults tend to notice the nervous feeling of a blood sugar drop.
As a camp counselor, I actually had to take a camper to the hospital because it seemed that she was having a seizure. It turned out, she ate so much sugar at home that she was going through withdrawal from the camp diet. Scary time with a happy outcome. (She was fine after a couple of days)
This is one of the more pervasive myths here. It's been disproven by studies time and time again, which have shown that parents will identify hyperactivity in their children after a party when they're told they've been given sugar, and not when they're told they've only had healthy vegetable snacks, in pretty much exactly the same proportion for the real sugar-eaters as the real veg munchers.
The first paper on this studied the reaction of kids to sugar on 23 children. They came to the above conclusion. Twenty-one of the sets of parents disagreed with the conclusions.
Nope, but red food dye does! I learned that the hard way while babysitting :|
Something supposedly debunked but again it manifests in different children in different ways: 3yo son given red coloured drinks would be hyperactive for a couple of hours. His sister? No affect at all.
Load More Replies...Sugar is unhealthy when consumed in large amounts ( Dare I say, Type 2 Diabetes). Don't give children too much sugar. Sugar is addictive and has little to no health benefits. Not to mention, if they do not use the energy, it will be stored as fats and leads to childhood obesity.
It is a complete falsehood that if a penguin does not find love, it waddles off to die alone.
I was horrified when I first saw this, and since I couldn't find anything else on the internet about it, I reached out to Dr. Dees Boersma at the University of Washington and asked her about this claim.
She told me that she has 33 years of data and has observed pairings that have stayed together for as long as sixteen years. She also told me that penguins can get 'divorced' when not successful at mating, and that they will most likely will 'divorce' if not hatched. There is also a major gender skew of more males than females. If a male want a mate, he HAS to have a nest set up. Furthermore, females don't come ashore unless they are going to mate. So some females will skip breeding season if they are not in a mating mood.
For example, a female she studied had skipped pairing with her male for a year. The male looked for another mate didn't find one, and then the next year she was back with him. They do have emotions and they do vary in aggressiveness over a lifetime.
Furthermore, because there are many more males than females, a lot of males have never gotten mates. One of the penguins they've studied, "Turbo", a Magellan penguin, has not had a mate in 14 years and he keeps on trying.
So penguins do not, in fact, waddle off to die if they do not find a mate.
… most likely divorce if THEIR EGGS do not hatch. The couple are already hatched or they wouldn’t be mating.
Unless the reason for divorce is that one of them lied about their age.
Load More Replies...Turbo needs to take a leaf out of the zoo penguins book and just find a nice male mate
Did you know, they are "gay" penguin couples?? Don't tell Rhonda Santis! LOL! He'll outlaw Antartica!
I feel like if the other penguins knew he was called "turbo" he would be quite the hot commodity among penguin ladies.
That you eat 8 spiders in your sleep. You actually eat them mostly in your processed food, as the FDA allows a limit on things like peanut butter and tomato soup.
You are not limited to just 8 spiders. You can have as many as you want.
*slowly starts clapping* Well done, Troy. Well, f*****g, done.
Load More Replies..."average person eats 3spiders a year" factoid actualy just statistical error. average person eats 0 spiders per year. Spiders Georg, who. lives in cave & eats over 10,000 each day, is an outlier adn should not have been counted
You even left in the typo, I'm impressed! Also, I like your shoelaces.
Load More Replies...Where did that stupid myth about the 8 spiders come from??? And why 8? lol
Wrong. EU has regulations about how many insects parts there can be in different food. Flour, as an example, contain small amounts of more or less microscopic parts of insects. If you ever eat frukt or veggies, you will also get tiny amounts of insects. Not the huge buggs, obviously. But there are plenty of insects that are so small so you don't see them. And some of those insects will either stick to that apple even though you washed it, or the will be inside the apple. Non of this is dangerous. And no it is not possible to remove all traces of insects in our food. You would, for starters, need to go thru everything with a microscope to somehow pick out those occasional pieces of insects. You know, grain for grain thru the microscope with the flour, seeds, sallad etcetera before you use it. It is simply not possible to do on any meaningfull scale.
Load More Replies...Considering that the red dye in some food products came from crushing a type of beetle shell, that doesn't surprise me.
But some border on absurd, for example, the fact that undercover cops have to tell you. Besides the fact that this would make the entire point of being undercover useless, it’s probably a good idea to understand that the police can and will lie to people during the course of an investigation. Hence why it’s always best to lawyer up.
The best way to escape a bear is to run down hill. You may get faster running down hill, guess who else does too?
The best way to escape a bear is to outrun your hiking buddy.
The best way to escape a bear is have it spot you in a zoo. There's usually a moat or some other barrier keeping it from following you.
Load More Replies...You're much more likely to fall down running downhill. The bear has four legs and will not fall down.
Well, the bear has four legs to stumble over, you only have two.
Load More Replies...If it's brown, lay down. If it's black, fight back. If it's white, make peace with God.
If it's brown, lay down. If it's black, fight back. If it's white, you're f*cked!!!!
Listen if a bear is chasing me I'm just giving up....like clearly the Lord has decided to call me home....ina horrible and painfil way...and so be it...
> *1. Rabbits love to eat carrots.* Eating carrots can actually make rabbits sick because of their high sugar content. Rabbits mainly should only eat hay and/or grass. > *2. George Washington died of a cold.* George Washington was diagnosed with a cold, but actually he was suffering from a severe infection called “epiglottitis.” > *3. Dogs only see in black, white and gray.* Dogs are dichromial animals, so while they recognize fewer color differences than humans, who are trichromial, they still see a variety of actual colors. > *4. The red liquid coming from a steak is blood.* The liquid dripping out of a steak is mostly myoglobin, which is a binding protein found in muscle tissue. > *5. Searing meat seals the moisture in the meat.* Searing meat may cause it to lose more moisture in comparison to an equivalent amount of cooking without searing. Generally, the value in searing meat is that it creates a brown crust with a rich flavor. > *6. “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” was composed by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart when he was five years old.* “Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star” was not composed by Mozart. He only composed variations on the tune, and then at the age of 25 or 26. > *7. Jesus was born on December 25.* The Bible never claims December 25 as the birth date of Jesus but may imply a date closer to September. The fixed date is attributed to Pope Julius the First because in the year 350 CE he declared the 25th of December the official date of celebration. > *8. The black belt in martial arts indicates expert level or mastery.* The black belt in martial arts indicates high competence, but it does not necessarily indicate expert level or mastery. > *9. The oxygen we breathe comes from trees.* The oceans are responsible for 70% of the oxygen that we breathe, and it mostly comes from phytoplankton. > *10. The pyramids in Egypt were built by slaves.* Egyptian pyramids were built by workers, most likely paid workers.
Rabbits do love carrots…as a TREAT. The sugar is too high for regular consumption but safe as an occasional treat. Domestic rabbits need a constant supply of hay for their digestion, along with daily romaine or red or green leaf lettuce. Never iceberg though
My rabbits had lots of iceberg and got ducking old (10 years)
Load More Replies...Nice list, just one (AFAICT) that's not quite correct. Epiglottitis is not an infection but an inflammation of the epiglottis. That's exactly what the medical use of the "itis" ending means. Yes, it can be caused by infection and some of the more common causes could easily be mistaken for a common cold.
The pyramids may very well have been built by extraterrestrials. I'm all in on that conspiracy theory and proud of it
I find the "built by the Atlantis folk" theory kinda entertaining. It replaces aliens with a lost, globe spanning ice age super culture that built pretty much everything ancient.
Load More Replies...You can't fool me, there's no such thing as a Sanity Clause (Chico Marx)
Load More Replies...𝐀𝐬 𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐓𝐚𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐨𝐨 𝐃𝐨, 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐭𝐬 𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐕𝐄 𝐛𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐭.
Earning the Black Belt in martial arts is like graduation from elementary school.
Einstein didn't fail math
I think it was the thing where he had a 4 point grading scale, 4 being the highest (which he got) and then when he transferred to Switzerland (?) they also had a 4 point grading scale, 1 being the highest, (which he got) and people thought he failed.
Load More Replies...Here a comment I made only one or two weeks ago. About how that wrong "fact" came to be: Einstein was born and raised in Germany first and moved to Switzerland later. Switzerland and Germany both have a Grade System, that gives grades between 1 and 6 (with halfs and sometimes quarter grades). The thing is, In Germany, 1 is the best Grade and 6 the worst - But in Switzerland, 6 is the best grade and 1 the worst. He aced Math, but it looked like he failed miserably, if one didn't catch that the Grade was from another country.
My hypothesis for the origin of the "fact" is that he made somewhere a joke along the lines of "however much you struggle with math, keep trying, I assure you my struggles are greater" --- because he was indeed struggling against quite advanced math, not because he was bad at it. Maybe both together caused the 'fact', using the one as supporting evidence for the other.
Load More Replies...This became famous as an item in a syndicated newspaper feature titled "Ripley's Believe It or Not!" In this case, not.
The man literally taught himself calculus when he was 12 just because he wanted to know how it worked.
It's an abbreviation. In an abbreviation, you leave out letters.
Load More Replies...In some rare cases, these facts were spread as disinformation and have simply managed to survive any scrutiny. This is why lists like this are useful, as it helps reset all the incorrect facts we might each be carrying around. So if you would like to investigate some more of Bored Panda’s actually false fact lists, look no further.
The food pyramid. It was lobbied into what we grew up on by the food industry, having plenty of grain. I mean, come on, grain is not more necessary than vegetables and fruit.
Yup! Protein ( amino acids) is essential for cell growth and repair of damaged tissues, Carbs (glucose) are sources of fuel. Fruit and veggies are a good source of vitamins and minerals and contain dietary fibers that prevents constipation by providing bulk to stool and softening it. Not one is less important the the other (don't consume too much sugar, even though they are sources of energy, there is little nutritional benefit)
But you don't need nearly as much protein as is eaten in the US at least.
Load More Replies...That always confused me as a kid. Like if it was true, what did people do who hadn’t domesticated cows?
This is what they teach us here in Germany Lebensmitt...2f-png.jpg
Are those eggs in the carb section? Shouldn't they be with the protein?
Load More Replies...Everyone's metabolism is different. Pay attention to how carbs affect your energy. If they put you to sleep ofr make you tired, eat less carbs. But if preparing to run a marathon, then store up on carbs the few days before. If overweight, you ate too many carbs. Sit at a desk and have a sedentary lifestyle? Eat less carbs. Construction worker doing a very physically demanding job? Eat more carbs. The food pyramid needs some kind of activity level variance chart.
Also of note in the US: The nutrition facts on all foods? The recommended daily allowances are based on the needs of an adult male who works a manual labor job. They have never been updated to reflect the needs of women and the more sedentary modern lifestyle resulting from automation.
"Breakfast is the most important meal of the day."
This originated as an ad campaign to sell breakfast cereal.
Whenever I eat anything substantial within a couple hours of waking up it makes me nauseated and feeling bloated all day. So yeah, I've never liked this saying or believed it to be true for my body at least.
Breakfast, which I rarely eat, has the same effect on me. I thought something was wrong with me.
Load More Replies...You are "breaking a fast" after not having food for eight hours of sleep. The morning is when we have the most acid production ready to break down proteins. Eat more protein rich foods at breakfast as you have the most acid production to digest it. Eat the most carbs at dinner as carbs produce serotonin and that makes one restful and sleepy.
In Europe is that saying too, and we (mostly) don´t eat cereals for breakfast. It´s older that "American breakfast".
Since I retired, I no longer roll out of bed and go out for breakfast. Because they don't serve it at 2pm.
In the morning eat like a King, lunch like a Prince and dinner like a begger.. i will delete this
More important is to eat low GI foods for breakfast so you can sustain energy during the day, not just eating sugary cereals etc
I understand that this is different for different people, but if I for some reason don't have breakfast (bacon and eggs) in an hour or so I will suddenly feel so week, I fear not being able to get up and get anyting to eat.
That we only use 10% of our brain and if we could use 100% we'd all be super geniuses or something.
I was just listening to something about this the other day. What sparked it was brain scans done on a man who only had about 10% of his brain, the rest of his skull was empty. So it was reported that your brain can still function (this guy had no signs of neurological issues otherwise) with that little brain. Years later someone read this, misunderstood, and spread it that we only use 10%. Then of course sci-fi took that idea and ran with it.
The concept of "we only use 10% of our brain" comes from around 1890-1920, predating brain scans, and the man you're referring to (who, if it's the same guy I'm thinking of,) was studied in the mid-aughts.
Load More Replies...If you used 100% of your brain at the same time, we'd call that a spectacular seizure.
Open Task Manager to end some processes hugging the CPU
Load More Replies..."if we could use 100% we'd all be super geniuses or something" like Wile E Coyote
The whole tongue map thing. You don't have parts of the tongue that only react to a specific taste.
While dining, the ancient Romans did not ritualistically eat so much that they had to interrupt eating to go vomit. An entranceway to a stadium of that time was called a *vomitorium* and had nothing to do with dining. I have seen this "fact" in at least two children's history books and I have no idea how or why some historian came up with this weird claim.
Speaking of eating, those fat "Buddha" statues and depictions you see in some Asian restaurants are not the historical Buddha (who founded Buddhism and was not obese). They are *Budai*, a 10th-century Chinese folk hero, who eventually became a buddha himself.
I mean, they came up with it because it sounds like something you'd do in a vomitorium. They were just too lazy to check. And a vomitorium was actually so-named for being an *exit* from a stadium - it's where the people spewed out after the show. So the vomiting is there, but it's metaphorical.
Yes! So many people think Budai are the Shakyamuni Buddha- so annoying!
Never heard of the buddha thing. Ive always hear it that after meditating to reach nirvana for years (i think), when he came out he was skin and bone. So he ate enough to make up for those years.
Eating carrots doesnt actually improve your night vision. This was a disinformation campaign carried out by the British in WWII to keep the Germans from discovering that they invented radar. Pretty funny/obvious once you stop and think about it.
Eating carrots does help your eyesight, including your ability to see in the dark. But this myth was super exaggerated for the above mentioned reason.
One of my best friends is visually impaired and constantly is told to eat their carrots
My dad used to tell me to eat my carrots because "it'll put hair on your chest." I knew he was kidding but being female and my dad having a very hairy chest, I avoided them at all costs. I still don't like raw carrots.
That Pearl Harbor was the only attack on US soil during WWII.
In fact, the Japanese bombed Dutch Harbor and invaded the Aleutian Islands. There were also U-boat attacks on the West Coast and German spies who landed via U-boat on the East Coast. None of these were particularly consequential in the grand scheme of things though, so they were forgotten.
There were also balloons equiped with incendiary bombs that were send from Japan eastwards by using high winds, with at least one case being known to be successful
That's why the Smokey the Bear campaign was started! Because of these attacks! (I just learned that the other day, hence the exclamation marks. Yay for learning!)
Load More Replies...They also captured Guam, the Philippines (then US territory), and many other US possessions in the Pacific.
I've never heard or read any claim that lists Pearl Harbor as "only." Besides the ones you pointed out, there's also Guam, Wake, and Midway. Certainly of our state and territories, Pearl is the most notorious, devastating, obvious...but I've never heard anyone claim "only".
Microwaves and cell phones cause cancer from "radio waves".
The visible light spectrum has more energy than any of the waves coming from your microwave or cell phone. Both microwaves and cell phones do not emit ionizing radiation. However, humans do! :D
Even though it won't die of cancer it's still not advisable to dry your wet cat in a microwave.
Another reason to stay away from the WET.
Load More Replies...
If you're undercover and a cop you have to tell me
Cops can and do lie to you to get you to tell them information. When they are questioning you, they are not on your side and are not your friend.
This wasn't even a phenomenon I had heard of until recently on BP. It doesn't make sense to be undercover and then tell anyone who asks. How did this myth even start?
I blame Steve Buscemi, "hello fellow students"...
Load More Replies...I believe the one restriction is when they are dealing with sex trade workers, they cannot fully disrobe, and then arrest the worker. Please enlighten me if this is not correct.
I don't know in other parts of the world but in Spain you have the plain clothes police and the undercover, ie, secret police that can be working undercover for months.
It's the same in the US. Undercover cops pretend that they're not cops by dressing and acting differently so that they can secretly investigate an individual or group and get information for a case they're working on. Plain clothes cops are usually detectives who don't wear a uniform but identify themselves to the public as cops. And all cops can and do lie to people to get information at any time.
Load More Replies...Documentaries like Tatort, Law and Order, Inspector Clouseau tell us that's not true.
Tatort is a major success, but it's not a documentary. It's a series of movies, or more a concept of which the serii are derived.
Load More Replies...
Blood isn't blue in your veins. It's definitely still red. Just darker.
Most veins transport deoxygenated blood, which is darker as compare to oxygenated blood.
I'm being pedantic here, I freely admit it, but: ALL veins carry deoxygenated blood. Oxygenated blood is carried by arteries. EDIT - apparently I forgot about pulmonary veins/arteries. I stand corrected, thank you @gimmie that cash & @chihuahua mama.
Load More Replies...It doesn't actually "turn" green per se - red is the longest wavelength of visible light, so we as humans lose visibility of red very fast when it gets dark. The blood appears green underwater because no red wavelengths can penetrate down into the darkness.
Load More Replies...
Sharks aren't actually as dangerous as people make them out to be. I mean, I wouldn't recommend you hug one, nor would I recommend you suddenly act casual around them like they are buds, but it won't come and eat you just because you are there. They have a pretty fine diet, and only really eat anything outside of their diet if they are starving (which is rare).
The only time they will attack outside of feeding, is when they feel you are a threat, or when provoked, and are usually fended off pretty easily by hitting them on the snout/eyes.
They investigate things with their mouths and will often take an exploratory bite, unfortunately humans are quite delicate so we will potentially lose limbs or our lives. Bull sharks are a******s though, you should definitely stay away from them, they have the most testosterone in the animal kingdom and it makes them kinda grumpy.
How to discourage a shark; poke it in the eye. With what, my stump? - Robert Schimmel
But you need to remember if you're lying on your surfboard with arms and legs paddling you look like a giant nommy turtle so the shark is going to nom you.
I don't need a surfboard to look like a giant nommy turtle
Load More Replies...As we kill more and more fish in the oceans, it has a knock on effect. Sharks love to eat seals - seals eat fish - less seals means hungrier sharks and what do humans sort of look like in shallow water - close enough to seals to be bitten and tried.
Over fishing has led to the activity of Shark Attacks, because the sharks are finding it easier to catch people
Great white sharks prefer seals as food to everything else. Humans in wetsuits look an awful lot like seals to the sharks, they take a bite, think, "Ewww! A disgusting human, not a tasty seal! and spit the human out. Unfortunately for the human, unless they can get to a hospital quickly, they will probably die from blood loss.
Urine is not sterile.
Nope. It may pick up some bacteria from the exit hole, but there shouldn't be bacteria inside
Load More Replies...I actually learned that it is in nursing school in the 90s. Some of the stuff here is just outdated information that we've learned more about
Doctor House say's it's sterile, so I believe it cause he's the best.
That daddy longlegs are the most venomous spiders in the world, but their fangs just aren’t big enough to spread enough venom
The mantis shrimp can't see a million zillion colors, earlier researchers made an assumption that their cones worked in the same way as our three do (color opponency). The Oatmeal and a few others didn't know how to differentiate assumption from fact and popularized this idea of a hyperaware shrimp. Extensive studies since then have disproved their color discrimination magic because, surprise, their retina is built differently.
I think their onepunchman strength is still valid though
The eye has evolved so many times independently, it's almost as if it's a very useful bodypart.
I got punched in the hand by a mantis shrimp and it is quite startling but I think he/she took it easy on me because he/she just wanted me to get my hand off the entrance to it's hole in the reef...(scuba diving.)
I read about this recently. A theory was that they use their eyes to look for patterns, to see is something is prey or predator. They also can see circularly polarized light to find their own kind. This isn't all I read you should check out the book Immense World by Ed Yong
The myth that Titanic was in any way badly designed, badly built, or badly operated by the standards of the time. In fact there are so many ridiculous inaccuracies surrounding Titanic that it's hard to list even a fraction of them here...
* She was an incredibly seaworthy ship - much more so than any passenger ship around today. The iceberg tore a gash almost a third of the way down her side, and she still stayed afloat for more than two hours!
* In that time, all but two of her lifeboats were launched - there wasn't time to launch any more. She could have had a hundred more lifeboats on board, but that wouldn't have helped without vastly more crew to operate them.
* Titanic's passengers genuinely did believe that she was practically unsinkable. When the time came to begin loading the lifeboats, many thought they would be safer staying on Titanic. There wasn't time for the crew to wait around convincing more people to get in, so when a lifeboat was ready, if there was no-one else waiting to get in, it had to go. This is why so many of Titanic's lifeboats left only half-full - the crew weren't worried about over-filling them.
* Titanic wasn't travelling too fast for the conditions - by the standards of practice around at the time. Further precautions were put into practice after the incident, but no-one on board can be blamed for doing what anyone on any ship would have done the same.
* Titanic was by no means a fast ship - nor was she ever intended to be. The White Star Line (Titanic's owners) were in competition with one other big shipping line, Cunard. Cunard's liners (Mauretania, Lusitania and later Aquatania) were the fastest in the business. To combat this, instead of fighting for speed, White Star decided to try to make their liners the most luxurious in the world. Olympic and Titanic were famed for their splendour and comfort - passengers said that it was easy to forget that you were at sea, as there were very few vibrations from the engines, and the ships remained stable even in fairly rough seas. By comparison, Cunard's liners were very fast, but their quadruple-screw configuration made vibration more apparent. It's a myth that Titanic was ever trying to make record-breaking speed across the Atlantic.
* She wasn't built using sub-standard materials. This rumour goes around a lot these days because of an article that was written some time ago - what the article is supposed to mean is that there is much better quality steel available today. This was not the case in 1909. Additionally, Titanic's builders were paid on a fee plus materials basis - they were given a set fee to construct the ship, plus the cost of *all* materials used. There was no incentive to use anything but the best steel they could get their hands on. The shipyard had an excellent reputation and would not risk tainting it by using bad steel, which could easily be noticed on inspection anyway.
* Titanic and her two sister ships Olympic and Britannic were also surprisingly manoeuvrable for their size - much more so than was expected. Some will tell you that Titanic's rudder was too small, but this simply isn't true. In fact, Olympic's wartime captain marvelled at her manoeuvrability, and was even able to throw her into a sudden turn, ramming (and sinking) a German U-boat. Olympic was the only merchant vessel throughout the First World War recorded to have sunk an enemy vessel.
* While it's true that the lookouts' binoculars were misplaced (or rather, locked away in a cabinet that no-one on board had the key to open), this made no difference to Titanic's fate. The images of sea captains and pirates scanning the horizon through telescopes, while common in films, has virtually no stead in reality. Binoculars and telescopes narrow your field of vision down to a fine point, making it harder to spot anything. Lookouts on real ships will use their eyes alone to search for objects of interest, and once they've been spotted, will use a set of binoculars to further inspect it. Titanic's lookouts would not have been using their binoculars to search for iceberg even if they'd had them.
* Third class passengers were never trapped below decks - the big metal gates you might remember from the film never even existed. The only time passengers were kept below decks was near the beginning of the disaster, when the officers needed time to prepare the lifeboats. First and second class passengers were allowed on deck, but as there were so many more third-class passengers the crowd was asked to stay below for a short while, until the officers were ready to start loading lifeboats. No-one was ever locked up. In fact a higher percentage of third-class males survived the sinking than second-class males.
* Titanic was the largest ship in the world, but not by much - her older sister Olympic was identical in almost every way. A few changes to Titanic's layout (including the covering up of some promenade decks, making them count as interior space) made her technically larger, but both ships were exactly the same length, breadth and height. Olympic had a GRT (gross registered tonnage) of 45,324 gross register tons. Titanic's GRT was some 1,000 tons greater. After the disaster, Olympic received a refit, after which her GRT was up to about 30 more than Titanic's had been. But Titanic's younger sister, Britannic, which was launched after the disaster and had been modified during construction as a result of it, was about 2 feet wider than her sisters and had a GRT more than 2,000 tons greater than Titanic's.
* White Star Line's owner, Bruce Ismay, likely had nothing to do with the incident. Another myth popularised by the film is that Ismay had convinced Captain Smith to sail faster and try to get to New York in record time. He's also portrayed as a bumbling idiot, and sneaks onto a lifeboat when the officers aren't looking. While we'll never know whether or not Ismay really did discuss Titanic's schedule with Smith, it's incredibly unlikely - Smith was looking to retire after commanding Titanic, had an extremely good reputation, and was a much-loved public figure. Passengers scrambled to sail on a ship under his command. He is unlikely to have been swayed to make rash decisions based on Ismay's need for Titanic to make headlines. Ismay himself played an active role during the sinking, helping passengers into lifeboats and doing what he could where possible (one officer recalled telling him to get out of the way as he was making a nuisance of himself by getting involved, but testified that he was trying to help). Ismay stepped into an empty spot on one of the last boats to leave the ship, just as it was preparing to lower. He didn't take anyone else's space. Unfortunately the media needed a scapegoat, and he was the highest-ranking official to survive the disaster. He adopted a secluded lifestyle after the disaster, funding several naval charities but otherwise staying out of the public eye.
* Higher watertight compartments or compartments sealed at the top would not have saved the ship - Most people could tell you that Titanic sunk because the weight of the water in the foremost watertight compartments pulled the bow down, allowing the water to spill over the top into more compartments, and so-on throughout the ship. But had Titanic's watertight bulkhead walls run all the way to the top deck, she might actually have sunk faster - with so much water contained in the front third of the vessel, she would have begun to tilt forwards much earlier, and possibly have broken in two sooner than she did. Sealing the tops of the bulkheads to prevent water from spilling over is actually illegal, and still is today. The International SOLAS (Safety Of Life At Sea) Regulations state that no civil (non-military) vessel can have any obstruction above watertight compartments that could impede a passenger's escape. The bottom line is that Titanic was damaged beyond her specifications, and was doomed from the moment she hit the iceberg.
* "Full Astern" - There's a belief (popularised by the film) that Titanic's engines were thrown full astern on sighting the iceberg, and that this may have hindered her ability to turn away from it. This rumour started because of evidence given by the fourth officer, who who wasn't even on the bridge at the time of the collision. The only survivor who was present was the quartermaster, but from his position in the wheelhouse he couldn't see the commands sent to the engine room on the bridge telegraphs. Survivors from the engine room and the boiler rooms attested that the command was "stop" rather than "astern". Whoever you choose to believe, when you think about the timescale it really makes very little difference. There was less than 40 seconds between the iceberg sighting and the collision - and in that time, the lookouts had to ring the bell, pick up the phone, wait for 6th officer Moody to enter the wheelhouse and answer it, and alert him to the iceberg; then, Moody relayed that order to the most senior officer on the bridge (1st Officer Murdoch); Murdoch ordered the turn to port, then crossed to the telegraph to send the order to stop. Try acting that out in real time, and work out how long the engineers had to act on the "stop" order - not long enough. There's a really good article explaining exactly what went on in the engine rooms [here]( http://www.uco.es/~ff1mumuj/titanic1.htm); this goes into a lot more detail than I can, and comes to the same conclusions. Long story short - there wasn't even enough time to stop the engines, let alone put them in reverse. Slowing down or keeping full-ahead would have had no difference, as the turning circle stays the same. Leaving the starboard engine running may have turned Titanic's bow away from the iceberg, but it would have made it more difficult to keep the stern away.
This post is so big it could be an entire article on its own. Very interesting!
I always enjoy reading more about the Titanic. Not too long ago, someone posted a video on Facebook of the ship’s whistle being blown again, after it had been recovered and repaired for display. They had to use compressed air instead of steam, due to the fragility of the whistle, but it was quite eerie and somewhat sad to hear it being sounded one last time.
The way that the Titanic was built, it would have survived a head-on collision, since only one compartment would have been breached. By vearing to the side, the iceberg tore through enough compartments to sink it. It was a pretty safe ship, and the chances of such an accident occurring exactly as it did were extremely low. But sometimes you do get 10 tails in a row.
Are there any "He" ships? Or ships that haven't been inappropriately gendered?
All the same, I'm glad my grandparents came to America on other ships.
You see this in the media a lot. That a heart attack is the same as cardiac arrest. It's not. In order for a body to function normally, blood needs to flow to the cells to drop off oxygen and nutrients and take away waste products. If that process stops, the cells begin to starve, fill up with waste and die. The blood travels through arteries in the heart just like most other places in the body. A heart attack is when one or more of those arteries are blocked and the heart tissue starts to die from starvation. If enough cells die, the entire organ dies. A cardiac arrest is when the entire heart fails to pump normally. Resulting in that blood flow stopping throughout the entire body. Not just the heart. There are several causes of cardiac arrest. One of them being a major heart attack that kills enough of the heart muscle. But you can have a cardiac arrest from having a multitude of medical problems. From a burst blood vessel in your brain to a blocked blood vessel in your lungs and even losing enough blood or having a huge systemic infection. These are the people who need CPR. Edited for over simplification and clarity.
Heart attack is a plumbing issue, cardiac arrest is an electrical problem. (from my nursing program lol)
As OP stated "cardiac arrest" and "heart attack" are 2 different things, and the Death Note would know the differences.
Load More Replies...I had a heart attack January 31, 2023. I have never had heart problems, but I knew immediately that I was having an attack. I was able to take short breaths. I broke out in a cold sweat and the pain stayed in the middle of my chest and did not go down my arm, which is typical for women. I called 911 and was able to give them all the information about when it started and what my symptoms were. I was rushed into the operating room and had two stents put in one artery. I was lucky that it was not the widow maker. I was confused because I had an EKG in September of 2022 and a PET scan in November 2022 and nothing appeared abnormal. My cardiologist said that a couple of pieces of plaque broke off and went to the same artery. One part was 100% blocked and the other was 60% blocked. Sometimes you just never know
TBI it's still confused by the use of those two terms. Better to sick with the more correct medical terms of Myocardial Infarction (MI) which is what you describe as a "heart attack" and cardiac fibrillation which is when the heart stops beating properly. It's this latter that is most confusing if you use the term Cardiac Arrest, because it's not actually stopped beating, just lost it proper rhythm,
That a soul has weight (specifically 21 grams).
The study that this is based on only tested 6 people. One out of the six lost weight at death and only at death. The rest of the patients either had multiple fluctuations, not just at death, or had no change at all. The researcher even said that more studies would need to be done, yet for some reason many people now think that a soul weighs 21 grams.
I'm Catholic. I've considered the soul to be something spiritual. We can't feel or measure it. It's beyond such things.
I'm atheist/agnostic and also agree with you. Faith isn't a measurable object.
Load More Replies...I mentioned to a devout Christian that my dog "went to doggy heaven". My euphemism for his passing. He told me dogs don't go to heaven because they do not have a soul. I told him if there are no dogs in heaven, then why would anyone want to go there?
Catholic Christian, and I agree. Why would heaven be barren of animals? I believe it is directly described as having gardens, and being a paradise, so why wouldn’t all of our pets be there?
Load More Replies...Christian here. I also think it might have been the gas escaping the body. A soul having weight just wouldn't make a lot of sense.
I like that this is presented as if the existence of a soul is "factual".
Based on a 1906 flawed study by Dr. Duncan MacDougall of Haverhill, Massachusetts. This post is in the wrong category. This isn't a thing that is common belief nor provably true or untrue.
Believing in god is not harmless. God is fake. When you die you are just gone.
Okay, sure but if you die and there is a heaven sucks for you....if I die and there isn't a heaven what does it matter im dead anyway. Me believing there is something more doesn't harm anyone in anyway whatsoever.
Load More Replies...
There were two that used to get circulated in chain emails back in the day. I haven't seen it in a while, so maybe its gone, but:
A Pregnant Goldfish isn't called a "Twit." For one, Goldfish don't get pregnant; They lay eggs. Secondly, there isn't a record before 1990 or so of anyone saying this.
Second, a duck's quack does indeed echo. I suspect it was also just made up at some point, but there isn't anything special about a duck that makes it break the laws of physics.
There is a tv show called Duck quacks don't echo where they explained that this was a myth
You mean Mythbusters? Yes, they were the ones to test this myth with a pair of very adorable ducks
Load More Replies...1. Hadn't heard that about 'twit', remember being told that 'pillock' was a pregnant trout when I first came to England. Having spent a large portion of my youth on a farm, I pointed out the same as above, that egg layers don't get 'pregnant' [FYI 'Pillock' means penis]. 2. Again, having been on a farm and am a current owner of various ducks, I can confirm that duck quacks do echo, especially call ducks and whistle ducks.
Watched an old episode of QI yesterday (the one with Corey Taylor from Slipknot), and Sandi asked the question 'do ducks quacks echo' and the answer was 'ducks quacks do echo, but in fact, most ducks don't quack at all' (23mins in) https://youtu.be/g3NJuHJb-vY?si=UVHCCljhpk3FY2xU
I seem to remember hearing the 'pregnant goldfish is called a Twit' back in the late 60's.
So the old saying should be "If it QUACKS, Quacks, quacks, ... like a duck, ..."
Pint if order. Wrong as it is, the idea has been around amongst kids since at least the 1970s that I can personally remember. And 'Twit' is spelt with an a in the middle, not an I, but presumably twat would be auto-censored by the BP bots
Spelt with an 'a', it has a TOTALLY different meaning in Australia, NZ, and the UK!!
Load More Replies...Saturated fat causes heart disease. This is a common misconception based on Ancel Keys's Seven Countries Study from 1961, where he cherry picked data from seven of the 20ish countries he studied, and constructed a trendline that illustrated the narrative he believed: that we are more likely to get heart disease with the more saturated fat we consume.
Too much saturated fat will lead to heart disease. It's fine if saturated fats are consumed in moderation.
Not correct. The Lewis and Clark expedition lived on almost exclusively wild caught animal protein loaded with saturated fat and suffered no health issues. Read the book "Food: What the Heck Should I Eat?" by Mark Hyman. He explains that it is not eating saturated fat that is unhealthy, it is the quality of the fats that is the issue. For example grass fed beef is perfectly healthy whereas corn fed beef is altered and not healthy.
Load More Replies...
