40submissions
Finished
Fashion Hits And Total Misses From The 2025 Academy Museum Gala
The Academy Museum Gala kicked off in California, and Hollywood’s who’s-who – dressed to impress or confuse – were in attendance.
The so-called “Met Gala of the West” featured the likes of Bowen Yang, who received the Vantage Award; Penélope Cruz, honored with her Icon Award; and director Walter Salles, who was given the Luminary Award.
Bruce Springsteen, unlike the latter, not only received (a Legacy Award) but also gave a performance at the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures.
Also in attendance were Kim Kardashian, Naomi Watts, and Jeremy Strong, among others. Below, we will try to establish just why they were there.
This post may include affiliate links.
Demi Moore
Viola Davis
Chase Infiniti
Beautifully made and fits her perfectly, the colour is OK but personally I'd have chosen something a little stronger.
Jeremy Strong
Jeremy Strong showed up to the event in a bright red suit with knife point pleats.
It cannot be denied that it was a bold choice that arrests the eye of the casual onlooker and may cause the feeling one gets right before they cry.
The Concession alum knows that feeling too, and came prepared for the wardrobe’s brilliance.
As seen in the photo, he brought dark glasses.
We do not know the inspiration behind the look, who made the shirt, or where the hard-sole black shoes came from.
Only that it was compiled by Loro Piana.
Zoë Kravitz
Zoë Kravitz rocked up at the event in a voluminous dress the color of decaying leaves at the bottom of a stagnant body of water or as the Daily Mail wrote:
She “hid her fantastic figure in so many ruffles and puffed fabrics that she was totally overwhelmed by her dress.”
Said dress was produced by Saint Laurent and really reminiscent of the proverbial missing curtains.
Maude Apatow
Maude Apatow’s garb ticked all the boxes of a gown for a glitzy event like the “Met Gala of the West.”
Its cut fits the conventional hourglass template without getting too gaudy in the strings, frills or puffs department.
But to say that it was mesmerizing would be an understatement. There are scientific studies declaring what Prada did on the Euphoria actress’s dress a Spiral Motion Illusion in which viewers could become overwhelmed and anxious.
Fortunately there were no casualties reported.
The actress rounded off her look with earrings and a necklace by Cartier.
Cara Delevingne
Cara Delevingne’s outfit speaks to an apparent theme of half-ways (halfway classy and halfway “what on earth is that thing?”) seen at the Academy Museum Gala.
She sported a glitzy number that was classy yet sensible enough to pass on any debutante. It was above the waistline that the trouble started.
We assume that the front did not have much to offer (by her standards), and so she turned her back to the camera.
Photographers snapped her looking over her shoulder to make sure they were getting the angle she wanted from them too—which was likely what appeared to be a representation of forest fungi crisscrossing her back and a rose-like appendage behind her neck.
She completed the look by Tamara Ralph with towering heels and Chopard jewelry.
Olivia Rodrigo
Oh, no! Her skirt has come off the corset and is sliding down! Quick, someone get her a pair of suspenders!
Greta Lee
Logan Lerman
Michelle Monaghan
Actress, Michelle Monaghan, went in the direction of fairy tale land maybe trying to show Disney what they out on missed casting Gal Gadot as the evil Queen in Snow White and not her.
The dress that was described as being inspired by “giant floral floats” came from Carolina Herrera’s 2025/2026 Spring Collection.
And aptly so, because so floral was it that it looked like it should be paired with antihistamines lest the wearer succumb to a full-on pollen allergy paroxysm.
Maybe it did; we noticed it has pockets.
The Kiss Kiss Bang Bang alum rounded off the look with conservative jewelry from Tiffany & Co.
Christina Ricci
It's almost like she forgot to bring the appropriate shoes for this outfit and was stuck wearing the only pair she had with her.
Renate Reinsve
Naomi Watts
We think Naomi Watts’ smile when she posed for the photo matched her outfit.
But we are also wondering if Doctor Hoffman’s “Bicycle Day” experiment would have rendered the same image had he not climbed on his two wheeler after dosing lysergic acid diethylamide, and instead explored the broom cupboard and stared at the mop.
Getty Images credits the long flowing plain one piece that is visually safe (until it gets to a place below the knees) to Balenciaga.
We credit said area below the knees to a magical contraption out of the movie Avatar.
Also Watts’ pose makes it terribly difficult to take the image seriously.
Maggie Gyllenhaal
It looks like they took one of those hats from Disney world, that looks like Mickey Mouse's ears and just stretched it out into that garment they're calling a dress.
Kristen Wiig
Monica Barbaro
A Complete Unknown actress, Monica Barbaro, showed face (and a lot of linen) at the Academy Museum Gala.
She was snapped amid-stride in what may have been a two-piece garment in which the top and bottom sections appeared interchangeable.
It came with two trailing black bows and bouquets of white flowers just below her middle.
She tied off the flowing white Dior ensemble with black suede heels matching her hair and De Beers jewelry.
Invented in the 1960s and called a "bumbleshoot".Still just as hideous.
Taylour Paige
Taylour Paige showed up at the event wearing a lace. The bodice part took on the appearance of a Cold War era bikini, but it may have been a separate garment from the outfit's bra—its all very confusing.
Then around the Zola actresses neck was a floral thing, matching in color, that may or may not have been intended as a bow. Or necklace.
The outfit has what appeared to be bolts of black lace redundant in their function (as a supposed garment) of covering the body, and leaves little at the mercy of the imagination.
Sources say the garment was from Balenciaga’s Spring/Summer 2008 ready-to-wear collection.
Elle Fanning
Elle Fanning went classy with her power bun and plain, swanky pastel pink dress-type-thingy.
We believe it was a full dress until James Patrick “Sulley” Sullivan’s little crimson-colored cousin, whom she may or may not have taken with her as a date to the event that night, got hungry and ate the front of her dress.
The photo shows the little “scarer” still cowering between her legs, likely camera shy.
An alternative explanation is that the red fluffy thing adorning her front is actually part of her outfit, and if one were to strain one’s imagination really hard, one could think that it was something designed by a fashion house like Balenciaga.
But fact is sometimes stranger than fiction, and so, to go with the jewelry from Cartier, the dress is actually a Balenciaga contrivance.
Kim Kardashian
Kim Kardashian was present, dressed by Maison Margiela. She opted for the skin-colored gown with a very strange-looking corset.
She topped it off with a heavy-looking spinel gemstone necklace and rings to match.
And then she gave her face the brown paper bag treatment.
So we’re here wondering: did she forget to do her makeup or get fashion tips from Ye?
Was it even her, or are we just going to have to take Getty at their word?
Also, the Louvre in Paris was just robbed and jewels went missing…
We are not accusing anyone, but there she was at a(nother) museum, with (a lot of) jewelry and a mask covering her face.
Fashion Status ... as in Terrible. Wow! Many of them seriously need #sane Image Consultants
If I can see your pants and t**s through the dress, it isn't a f*****g dress - it's 'tell me I'm pretty'! Are celebs seriously THAT thirsty, that they can have global fame, huge careers, millions of dollars, and still feel the need to walk around with everything hanging out just for attention? Get some self worth, Jesus... 🙄
So self-worth is defined by how much you can hide your body ?
Load More Replies...If you gotta let your nips or t1ts hang out, you aren't dressing for style, you are seeking terrible attention. Enough with the ugly see through garments and the undergarments showing
Nothing is ever "Must-See" or "Must-Have". My life is quite complete without them, thanks.
All of those so-called designers need to ho back to school and learn something.
Fashion Status ... as in Terrible. Wow! Many of them seriously need #sane Image Consultants
If I can see your pants and t**s through the dress, it isn't a f*****g dress - it's 'tell me I'm pretty'! Are celebs seriously THAT thirsty, that they can have global fame, huge careers, millions of dollars, and still feel the need to walk around with everything hanging out just for attention? Get some self worth, Jesus... 🙄
So self-worth is defined by how much you can hide your body ?
Load More Replies...If you gotta let your nips or t1ts hang out, you aren't dressing for style, you are seeking terrible attention. Enough with the ugly see through garments and the undergarments showing
Nothing is ever "Must-See" or "Must-Have". My life is quite complete without them, thanks.
All of those so-called designers need to ho back to school and learn something.
