Celebrities change their names all the time. Marriage, branding, tradition, reinvention - the reasons vary, but the internet’s reaction rarely does. For many fans, having to suddenly refer to their idols with a different name can be jarring.
Cultural sensitivities play a part in this. For some, a woman taking her husband's name feels like a relic of the past. For others, it’s a meaningful expression of tradition and family unity. And then there’s the growing middle ground, where couples choose joint surnames as a way to share both identities.
For the famous, it gets even more complicated. Their decisions often extend far beyond love or tradition. When a name is this powerful and this marketable, changing it can shift an entire brand and potentially cost a celebrity millions.
Whatever the motivation, one thing is certain: name changes will continue to cause debate.
These ten entries show exactly why.
This post may include affiliate links.
Amal Alamuddin
Why she changed her name:
After marrying actor George Clooney in 2014, the human rights activist adopted his surname and began being credited as Amal Clooney in press and in legal reporting, though her maiden name still appears in older casework and academic references.
The controversy:
The internet split in half. Some critics argued that such a high-profile lawyer, who built her own reputation, should not “erase” the Alamuddin name for a Hollywood star.
Others pointed out that it was her choice and that policing a woman’s surname was its own form of control.
Maybe she wanted to share a name with her husband and children. It is her decision alone and no other opinion matters
He should've changed his name to hers. She's a professional not just an actor.
That's rich! Have you noted the number of actors who have shipped out of the art to pursue education at ivy League schools???? That are brilliant, talented people
Load More Replies...A civil rights lawyer giving up her name because she married. Oh, the irony.
Priyanka Chopra
Why she changed her name:
After marrying singer Nick Jonas in December 2018, she added his surname to become Priyanka Chopra Jonas. She later explained that she wanted to sort of honor traditions without losing herself.
“I inherited a beautiful name and I hope to live up to its legacy,” she said, stressing there was “no way that my last name would have been lost.”
The controversy:
The backlash came from both cultures. In the west, some criticized her for adopting her husband’s name at all. In India, many expressed concern when she briefly removed “Jonas” from her Instagram bio.
Indian fans believed it signaled a looming divorce. Some went as far as to accuse her of staging her marriage for clout and claimed the name change had always been a publicity move.
The actress, on the other hand, has repeatedly said the choice was hers, and that she hopes future generations will see more flexibility in whether men or women change their surnames after marriage.
Smh... You would think people had more important things to worry about than what a married woman decides to do with her own name.
It's like toddlers in the tattle tale stage. You just want to say "Okay Brandon but you need to worry about what Brandon is doing."
Load More Replies...Brooklyn Beckham
Why he changed his name:
When Brooklyn married actress Nicola Peltz in 2022, the pair decided to merge their surnames, becoming “Peltz Beckham.” Brooklyn later explained that they “kind of combined [their] last names” because he wanted to be different and show unity as a couple.
The controversy:
Supporters praised the move as a rare instance of a man embracing his wife's name and giving both families equal footing.
Others believed the decision made the long-running tension between Nicola Peltz and the Beckham family even worse, with commenters reading the merged surname as yet another sign that the couple wanted to distance themselves from Victoria and David Beckham.
Sophia Smith
Why she changed her name:
In January 2025 she married NFL wide receiver Michael Wilson.
After the wedding she updated her social media and club materials to use his surname, becoming Sophia Wilson. From then on, outlets made a point to refer to her as “formerly known as Sophia Smith.”
The controversy:
Among fans, the shift from “Sophia Smith” to “Sophia Wilson” touched a nerve.
Reddit threads filled with people complaining that she had “made a name for herself as Sophia Smith” only to change it now, or worrying about how it would affect jersey sales and record books.
As the backlash grew, Wilson herself replied, writing that people “need to find a hobby,” and that her surname and her family plans are none of the public’s business.
Millie Bobby Brown
Why she changed her name:
After marrying Jake Bongiovi, son of rock star Jon Bon Jovi, Brown reportedly updated her legal name to reflect her new married status, with fans circulating screenshots and claims that she is now legally “Millie Bobby Brown Bongiovi.”
The controversy:
For a certain corner of the internet, the idea of Millie taking her husband’s last name felt like a betrayal of the independent “girlboss” image they had projected onto her.
Critics accused the actress of “rebranding herself around a nepo baby,” while others pointed out that she is a 21-year-old woman allowed to make her own decisions.
So you can't be a "girlboss" if you take on your husband's name? You're "rebranding yourself around a nepo baby" if you take on your husband's name? This is the dumbest sh*t I've ever read.
Let her do what she wants already. She's an adult and can make all the adult decisions she wants.
Wikipedia says that Millie Bonnie Bongiovi née Brown is still known professionally as Millie Bobby Brown. (Yeah. Her actual middle name is Bonnie - who knew?)
Salma Hayek
Why she changed her name:
Hayek married French billionaire François-Henri Pinault in 2009 and legally took his last name, becoming Salma Hayek Pinault.
In a 2023 conversation with Jimmy Kimmel, Hayek said that she had always had the name, but that “everybody refused to say it.” She explained this was made even worse because studios kept leaving “Pinault” off posters and credits.
The controversy:
Some commenters saw the billionaire surname as a status flex, joking that it was less about romance and more about reminding everyone of the luxury-group empire her husband runs.
Others framed it as “anti-feminist” for a powerful woman to foreground her husband’s name at the height of her career.
Meghan Markle
Why her name changed:
Born Rachel Meghan Markle, she became Meghan, Duchess of Sussex upon marriage, in line with royal convention.
Officially, she explained in a 2025 interview that her legal name is tied to her title and that “Sussex” functions as the family surname she shares with Harry and their children, even though the technical royal surname on documents is still Mountbatten-Windsor.
The controversy:
Critics seized on her preference for “Meghan Sussex,” accusing her of being obsessed with titles or trying to erase “Markle.”
Vogue noted that some outlets had “made a mountain” out of her decision to identify as Meghan Sussex despite the fact that royals have long used their territorial titles as surnames in daily life, just as Harry once used “Wales” in the army.
When William and Harry were at school, and then in the armed forces, they used 'Wales' as a surname. William's children are known as George Wales, Charlotte Wales and Louis Wales at school. Elizabeth II had a cousin, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent. He was married to Katharine, Duchess of Kent, but when she was a music teacher, she used the name 'Mrs Kent'. There is a tradition of using the 'territorial designation'.
Grumpy Old Man, your logic isnt logic-ing.The UK is a nation of nations, just as Canada is a nation of provinces and territories, and the same for Australia. And hold onto your hat, cause this is going to blow your mind, independent countries can actually have the same monarch. - the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Bahamas, Tuvalu etc.
Load More Replies...She doesn't understand how her title works as apparently neither does the press. Using Meghan, Duchess of Sussex is the style for a divorced woman as in Diana, Princess of Wales and Sarah, (ex!) Duchess of York. It leaves the title available if the ex-husband marries again. The new wife would be titled The Duchess of Sussex as in The Princess of Wales. Not Catherine, Princess of Wales. Trivial I know but it bugs me.
She is just a silly attention obsessed woman. Happy to have her over with you guys in the US
Ashley Tisdale
Why she changed her name:
More than a decade after marrying musician Christopher French in 2014, the actress announced in November 2025 that she is now using her married name professionally, going by Ashley French.
She updated her socials to “Ashley Tisdale French” and then simply “Ashley French.”
“I’ve been Ashley French for so long at home,” she explained. “I just felt like it was time for people to know me for me and not just a character, or like a celebrity.”
The controversy:
Nostalgic fans were torn. They mourned the “end” of the Tisdale name that defined their childhood Disney Channel years, insisting they would always call her Ashley Tisdale no matter what.
Supporters countered that she had been married for 11 years and was simply aligning her public identity with the one she already used in her personal life.
Kourtney Kardashian
Why she changed her name:
After marrying Blink-182 drummer Travis Barker in 2022, she updated her legal documents.
In June 2023 she posted a black-and-white photo of her new driver’s license showing “Kourtney Kardashian Barker,” captioning it: “Say my name.”
The controversy:
Netizens joked that she was “too thirsty to drop” Kardashian, accusing her of trying to have it both ways: the traditional wife rebrand and the lucrative family surname at the same time.
Others remembered the words of mom Kris, who once urged Kim to keep “Kardashian” for business reasons.
Hailey Baldwin
Why she changed her name:
Shortly after their courthouse wedding in 2018, Hailey updated her Instagram handle to “Hailey Bieber,” confirming the marriage publicly and aligning her brand with her husband’s global fame.
The controversy:
Interestingly, the backlash came mostly from Selena Gomez loyalists, who have spent years keeping the alleged feud between the women alive because it keeps Justin Bieber at the center.
Critics accused Hailey of marrying “into a last name” rather than building her own path, while defenders argued that the feud culture around these three people has become absurdly obsessive.
I think it's their lives. They want to change their name they can their name
So we are criticising people for chaning their name when they get married now? Sorry to say this, but this is a new low. Abel, as an article writer, you are better than this tripe!
I'm not sure about your last sentence. This seems pretty par for the course.
Load More Replies...A woman choosing to change her surename after getting married does not mean she's being submissive to her husband or that she doesn't believe in women's rights. Given that her maiden name likely came from her father, even if she keeps her birth surename, she's still known by a name given to her by a man.
If you get upset because someone changes their name. It shows that you're obsessed with that person and won't allow them to grow
I completely fail to see how any of this is anything to do with anyone but the couples involved.
Can you imagine the uproar it would cause if Taylor Swift dropped Swift off her name and added whatever Travis's last name is? I wish she would, that'd be hilarious!
I feel like a lot of the people commenting must be from countries who are a litlle... less progressive. In my country, it's the norm to choose your married name as you please and no one other than maybe very traditionalist (grand)parents make any kinda fuss about it. Personally I never understood why children should get only the father's name, as we here do it mostly so the children are tied to both parents by name in case they don't share the same last name. It's then anyone's choice what name they go by in their daily life. Also, I just don't get how being a fan of someone entitles you to dictate how they should define themself for all eternity (like the Ashley Tisdale/French entry).
I think it's their lives. They want to change their name they can their name
So we are criticising people for chaning their name when they get married now? Sorry to say this, but this is a new low. Abel, as an article writer, you are better than this tripe!
I'm not sure about your last sentence. This seems pretty par for the course.
Load More Replies...A woman choosing to change her surename after getting married does not mean she's being submissive to her husband or that she doesn't believe in women's rights. Given that her maiden name likely came from her father, even if she keeps her birth surename, she's still known by a name given to her by a man.
If you get upset because someone changes their name. It shows that you're obsessed with that person and won't allow them to grow
I completely fail to see how any of this is anything to do with anyone but the couples involved.
Can you imagine the uproar it would cause if Taylor Swift dropped Swift off her name and added whatever Travis's last name is? I wish she would, that'd be hilarious!
I feel like a lot of the people commenting must be from countries who are a litlle... less progressive. In my country, it's the norm to choose your married name as you please and no one other than maybe very traditionalist (grand)parents make any kinda fuss about it. Personally I never understood why children should get only the father's name, as we here do it mostly so the children are tied to both parents by name in case they don't share the same last name. It's then anyone's choice what name they go by in their daily life. Also, I just don't get how being a fan of someone entitles you to dictate how they should define themself for all eternity (like the Ashley Tisdale/French entry).
