The Captivating Stories Behind 21 Famous Paintings You Know (And A Few You Don’t)
While we might recognize most of these masterpieces and their artists, we probably don’t know much about the stories behind them. From personal experiences to hidden messages, each painting has an origin story that’s as captivating as the artwork itself. Some artworks weren’t understood, while others received critical acclaim. But what they all have in common is that they became revolutionary pieces of art that broke barriers in their time. We’ve compiled a list of 21 paintings that changed art forever, along with the intriguing stories behind them.
This post may include affiliate links.
Café Terrace At Night, Vincent Van Gogh (1888)
We really don’t have to dig very deep into the history of this painting to figure out how it came about. Vincent Van Gogh himself described his work in a letter to his sister, detailing the reasons why he didn’t want to use black, despite painting a night scene. It turns out that he wanted to capture the true colors of the night and portray it as full of life rather than darkness.
I can't help but appreciate the stroke-work. It's not as pronounced in this one as in something like The Starry Night, but it still pulls your eye along with it if you look close enough.
Christina's World, Andrew Wyeth (1948)
Initially, this 20th-century painting of a woman enjoying nature seems pretty ordinary; however, the true scene is actually quite sad. The woman depicted in the artwork was Andrew Wyeth’s neighbor, Anna Christina Olson. She suffered from a muscle disorder that left her unable to walk and would often be seen dragging herself across the grass on her family’s farm to make it home.
What appears to be a picture of natural beauty is, in fact, a picture of painful struggle.
I always thought she looked forlorn. Never did I think she was enjoying nature, rather lost in some kind of struggle.
I always felt the same. Like the house used to be hers and isn't anymore for some sad reason.
Load More Replies...You can tell by her arms and her movements that its not a picture of natural beauty. Not sure if anyone ever really thought that about this painting to begin with.
i hope he shared some of the profits from this painting to help with her medical expenses.
Impression, Sunrise, Claude Monet (1872)
Though critics labeled this painting as unfinished, messy, and slightly amateurish, it became an important artwork in history because it gave rise to Impressionism. Instead of painting the finer, realistic details, Claude Monet focused on perception and emotion, aiming to capture the movement and impression of a moment. When describing how the term Impressionism came about, Monet said, “They wanted a title for the catalog; it couldn't really pass as a view of Le Havre, so I answered: 'Put down Impression.’ Out of that, they got impressionism…”
I studied art history at varsity, and love this. It's about as Impressionist as you can get.
I have to ask out of curiosity: What makes you say that? I'm not very familiar with impressionist paintings. While I can appreciate that I like the look, I don't really understand the finer aspects of impressionism.
Load More Replies...There is a theory that impressionists painted this way because they were myopic and the world was blurry to them.
Never seen this one, but I'm quite fond of it. It's a very unique mixture of colors. It's simple at first glance, but the blending of color transitions in it holds some form of unique appeal that I can't place my finger on it.
A Sunday Afternoon On The Island Of La Grande Jatte, Georges Seurat (1884)
Considered one of the earliest examples of Pointillism, this 19th-century painting by Georges Seurat initially received mixed reviews, but has now become a symbol of the neo-impressionist movement. Despite being incredibly disciplined in his personal life, Seurat pushed boundaries and forever changed the history of art with his rebellious techniques. This painting is now celebrated as a masterpiece, along with many of his others that were created using tiny dots or strokes of pure color.
This painting is at Art Institute of Chicago. The first time I saw it I was surprised how big it is; 81.7" x 121.25" or 207.6 cm x 308 cm. It's quite amazing to see in person or at least it impressed a first year art major.
It is, it’s astonishing when you see it in person, I had no idea it was so large before seeing it, and it really adds to the impact. I had seen prints of it and loved it but seeing the original made me appreciate it even more. It has an amazing energy.
Load More Replies...There was a LOT more going on in Seurat's mind here than is visible in this painting. See another painting by Seurat called "Bathers at Asnières" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bathers_at_Asni%C3%A8res). It depicts a scene on the opposite bank of the Seine looking toward this island. Look at the factory belching smoke in the distance and compare it to the twee little steamer in "La Grande Jatte". Taken together, the two works are scathing social criticism. (Thanks to Waldemar Januszczak for pointing this out.)
It doesn't look all that impressive compared to other art at the time, but the vast size of it and that it was made with painstaking tiny dots was what made it amazing
Seurat was my "favorite artist" when I was a kid because "he painted with polka-dots!!" 😆
The Scream, Edvard Munch (1893)
While this painting doesn’t look haunting at first glance, it does, however, take on a different form when you discover that Edvard Munch captured his own raw emotions in the artwork. He painted the distraught figure and the menacing surroundings to convey what he felt when he heard an "infinite scream passing through nature" while taking a walk.
Whose writing these? OF COURSE it looks haunting at first glance!
I'll be that guy: The figure isn't the one screaming, by the way. The figure is reacting to hearing someone scream. Though at least this description mentions that it was painted from the perspective of him having hear said scream.
I would bet that 95% of people think The Scream is coming from the humanoid figure.
Umm. According to all my art history textbooks. This was based on his sister who heard an ungodly human scream and her reaction to it.
he painted at least 3 versions of this. he knew a best seller when he saw it.
Lady With An Ermine, Leonardo Da Vinci (1489)
For decades, there was much debate about whether the Lady with an Ermine painting was a Leonardo da Vinci piece or not. This was mostly because the painting was found to have layers of overpaint, and Leonardo’s signature appeared to have been added to it way after its creation. But when the painting underwent extensive analysis from 2012 to 2014, the stylistic and material consistency of the original work confirmed, without a doubt, that it was a Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece.
One Christmas, my broke friend and I decided to make gifts for each other to save money. When we traded gifts we found out we both chose this print to copy!!!
TIL. Ermine is an animal. I had heard of it, but never really questioned what it was.
Ermine is a member of the weasel family, changes the color of the coat according to the seasons. White in winter, brown in summer.
Load More Replies...It's in Krakow. Wonderful experience. Nothing like Mona Lisa in Louvre.
I was in Krakow when it arrived, there was a young lady dressed as this painting, with a plushie instead of a real critter, to advertise the painting
Load More Replies...she was an influencer in her time. ordinary people would have just had a cat . . .
Andolfini Portrait, Jan Van Eyck (1434)
Giovanni di Nicolao Arnolfini and his wife are said to be the couple depicted in this 15th-century painting by Jan Van Eyck. While the exact reason why they commissioned the portrait remains a mystery, every detail in it is thought to carry some meaning. Historians speculate that the couple might have been marking a marriage, taking an oath, or simply showing off their wealth.
If you can get close enough, the reflection in the mirror is very nearly perfect.
Oh, I actually like this one. The detail put into the mirror's reflection is amazing.
I saw a British show about costume and history/art and this one, the dress was recreated. she wasn't pregnant, she was holding the fabric/bunching it up because it was so heavy. The inside was all fur, not just trim, and the ruffle looking part at the bottom were long strips of fabric cut into small fans and sewn together to look like that. The girl they had wear it could hardly walk it was so heavy.
I saw a video about this some years ago and saw there's so much going on there. From the chandelier (only 1 candle) to the shoes, his hat... You can look at it for an hour and still pick out things if you are up on your knowledge of the place and time. It's a fascinating work though.
Does anyone see that she looks pregnant? Her left hand is positioned palm down over the upper portion of her abdomen as mothers - to - be often do.
Nighthawks, Edward Hopper (1942)
Considered one of the most famous paintings in American art, this 20th-century piece became an important part of the American Realism movement. Interestingly, its original name was Night Hawks, which could’ve been a reference to people who stay up late or maybe even the beak-like nose of the man behind the counter. When critics pointed out that the painting expressed loneliness and emptiness, Hopper commented, "Unconsciously, probably, I was painting the loneliness of a large city."
It's a painting from 1942, 19th century is in the 1800's.
Load More Replies...Hopper was always painting the planes and colors of loneliness. I love it.
I'd say he captured that loneliness quite well. I reminds 'me of the odd feeling of seeing a place you'd normally expect to be bustling as lacking customers. It's a sort of liminal-space type of feel. There SHOULD be more people in the diner, but there aren't and it gives it a strange and semi-familiar vibe.
The Kiss, Gustav Klimt, 1908
Gustav Klimt’s reputation had taken a serious knock after the public called his earlier work, the Vienna Ceiling series, too scandalous. However, he still took a chance on creating new artwork, starting on The Kiss. This painting was so well-received by critics and the public alike that the Belvedere Museum scooped it up before it was even finished, at a very high price, too.
I have always loved this piece. At the local marché I picked up a scarf with this painting as well as a tote bag, and I love them both.
Its still at the Belvedere. Also they have an exact copy in a separate small room for people to take selfies with. There is also a painting by Wilhelm Trübner of a great Dane eyeing up some sausages on a table, called Caesar at the Rubicon, which made me smile.
Load More Replies...It's a wonderful artwork, surprisingly big in size. Although personally I found Judith more fascinating.
Not my favorite piece, but I have to admit there's something captivating about the style and how it's presented.
Ironically, I actually have it hanging in my toilet. 😅
Load More Replies...At The Moulin Rouge, Henri De Toulouse-Lautrec (1893)
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec’s physical condition and the isolation he experienced because of it inspired his art in many ways. He was drawn to Montmartre’s nightlife and felt a strong connection to the marginalized in society, which became evident in his work. Unlike many artists of his time who portrayed those sidelined in society as caricatures, Toulouse-Lautrec depicted them as real people.
Subject-wise, this painting does nothing for me. Color-wise, I have to admit there's something so unique about the mix of colors chosen.
Definitely. I was just thinking about how he created shadow on the blonde’s face not with brown or black or grey, but with bright teal.
Load More Replies...American Gothic, Grant Wood (1930)
American Gothic is a famous early 20th-century painting inspired by the Dibble House Grant Wood spotted in Eldon, Iowa. Without knowing its residents, Wood used his imagination to recreate the people he thought might live in the home, and this is how the famous painting came to life. An interesting, but slightly strange detail is that he modeled the man and woman after his dentist and his sister.
There are a lot of Grant Wood's artwork in the Cedar Rapids Museum of Art, Cedar Rapids, Iowa.
he didn't use his imagination for the people. the guy is hoppers dentist. there are photos of the dentist admiring the painting in a museum
Looking at their faces, its easy to see how people have misinterpreted this as being a painting of a father and his daughter.
Wait, really? I'd always, apparently correctly, assumed it was a husband and wife. It never once crossed my mind that they weren't a married couple. I thought that was part of the point. What point, I have no idea. The art doesn't do much for me. It's good work, I just don't feel attachment to it. I'm more of a fan for surrealism, though, so that's part of the problem. There IS something about it that feels surreal, though, I just can't put my finger on it.
Load More Replies...The Son Of Man, René Magritte (1946)
Much like René Magritte’s other paintings, this artwork continues to puzzle historians. Some interpret it to have religious meaning, but its true message remains uncertain. Magritte himself fueled the mystery when he said, “Everything we see hides another thing, we always want to see what is hidden by what we see. There is an interest in that which is hidden and which the visible does not show us. This interest can take the form of a quite intense feeling, a sort of conflict, one might say, between the visible that is hidden and the visible that is present.”
This painting instantly gives me a combination of Monty Python and Pink Floyd vibes.
When I was a kid and I saw this painting, I thought it was because the artist messed up the face and decided to just paint an apple over it and claim it had some deeper meaning.
And you could very well be right. All that business about "...hides another thing" could just be his way of (round aboutly) saying "I fvcked it up then added an apple for mystery", lol.
Load More Replies...if AI is being trained on artwork like this, it explains why some the AI produced paintings are so hilariously wrong.
Oh I definitely like this one. Surrealism is right up my alley and I love a painting open to interpretation. It's titled The Son Of Man, and uses an apple as a censor of the man's face. At face (no pun intended) value, I'd assume that the apple is referencing the fruit that Adam an Eve indulged int, hence the reference to being the son of man, in this case, Adam. Still, I can't tell the actual intent, and that kind of makes it fun to roll ideas around. It could be something ultimately complex, or it could be something as simple as the artist accidentally left cheese out on the window sill (looking at you, Mr. Dalí)
The Librarian, Giuseppe Arcimboldo (1562)
Giuseppe Arcimboldo was best known for creating portraits entirely out of objects such as fruits, flowers, fish, or, in this case, books and book accessories. The Librarian painting is said to depict historian and humanist Wolfgang Lazius. There has been much debate among art historians as to whether the painting is a celebration of scholars like Lazius or a mockery of those who own books but don’t read them.
Sorry, but the only real "The Librarian" ever: says "ook" and eats bananas.
Sometimes I miss the quiet times back at the University. GNU Sir Terry Pratchett
Load More Replies...I choose to agree that it seems like a mockery of people owning books that they don't read. As if the person was defined entirely by their books, but can't read them because his body IS the fake library. Maybe I'm just looking too hard for meaning, but it's fun to consider.
The Persistence Of Memory, Salvador Dalí (1931)
Recognized as one of the most famous works of Surrealism, this 20th-century painting by Salvador Dalí aimed to explore how time, memory, and reality become distorted in dreams. In a review of the masterpiece, art historian Dawn Adès wrote, "The soft watches are an unconscious symbol of the relativity of space and time, a Surrealist meditation on the collapse of our notions of a fixed cosmic order." This interpretation reflects Dalí's fascination with challenging the perceptions of reality.
This is one of my favorite paintings, and the poster's overblown analysis of the painting is exactly why. When confronted with some deep explanation of what someone though the painting could mean, Dalí gave an interesting explanation. There is no deeper meaning. Dalí explained that he got the idea for the painting when he accidentally left some cheese out and it melted. The beauty of this painting is is that you look at it and expect deep meaning, but Dalí never intended it as such. Sometimes art doesn't need a deeper meaning. Though I'm certain Dalí never intended it as a commentary on how we see paintings, it stands as a powerful tentmate to how little we understand of the meaning behind the painting. We seek a deeper understanding, and the irony is that there isn't one. It's a completely subjective experience that, SOMETIMES, the painter directs with their own context of what the painting means. We assign meaning to them regardless of what the intent was.
Surprisingly, the paintings is more grounded than it initially seems.
Load More Replies...If you haven't seen it, check out a Dali + Disney (yes, Disney) collaboration that started in 1945 and didn't get finished until 2003. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destino
The Ambassadors, Hans Holbein The Younger (1553)
This 16th-century painting depicting French ambassador Jean de Dinteville and Catholic Bishop Georges de Selve isn’t just a double portrait; it’s also a still life masterpiece. What makes the artwork particularly special is that all the objects used in it carry meaning and have been the subject of debate for centuries.
I find the quality of the faces more satisfying than the static objects, which, to my mind, seem contrived (and this opinion is probably why I'm not an art historian.)
Actually, I kind of agree. I'm in the same boat. The specific interpretation of the art escapes me, but the faces draw my attention for some reason (More than just natural human pareidolia.
Load More Replies...The Turkish carpet in the center, a motif used so frequently by Holbein that the whole style is collectively referred to as "Holbeins" in the literature, is from western Anatolia. I've got two whose colors and patterns are very similar.
Girl With A Pearl Earring, Johannes Vermeer (1665)
Unlike most of the paintings in this list, the Girl With A Pearl Earring was a “tronie”. Johannes Vermeer didn’t paint the artwork as a portrait, but instead intended it to be an imagined figure dressed in exotic clothing. This is why not much is known about the woman depicted in the painting, although some historians believe the sitter might’ve been his sister.
This isn't even his best painting. The Little Street, The Wine Glass, Lady Writing a Letter with her Maid... So many others are better. https://www.artnews.com/list/art-news/artists/johannes-vermeer-best-paintings-where-1234664602/the-love-letter-ca-1669-70/
Real pearls come in a variety of roundish shapes, teardrop being one of them. 2 teardrop pearl earrings would be quite a status symbol.
Load More Replies...Mona Lisa, Leonardo Da Vinci (1503)
The Mona Lisa painting is believed to depict Lisa del Giocondo, an Italian noblewoman. It’s said that Leonardo was commissioned to paint her to mark a special occasion; however, instead of delivering the painting as promised, he kept it for the rest of his life. Today, historians still debate why he chose to do this.
Maybe he kept it because it just wasn't up to his standards? It became famous because it was famously stolen, and remained famous simply for being famous,not because it has great artistic worth. It's the Kardashian of art.
It was apparently not nearly as famous before it was stolen in 1911. The theif thought it belonged in Italy, not knowing that daVinci brought it to France himself. https://www.npr.org/2011/07/30/138800110/the-theft-that-made-the-mona-lisa-a-masterpiece
Load More Replies...I get the feeling that its like the Kardashians. Famous, simply for being famous. Possibly because it was stolen at one time (Sadly, unlike the Kardashians.)
Load More Replies...I read a short story about an art dealer finding a Mona Lisa that didn't look quite the same but was the same age. He ended up in cave with a huge selection of authentic but all slightly different versions and a contraption for flicking them past your view. Apparently the famous enigmatic smile was preparatory to her showing her booobs and giving one a twirl.
Sounds interesting. Do you remember the title or author of the story at all?
Load More Replies...When first painted, it was greatly admired for the incredible detail, notably her eyebrows, which were described as having each individual hair painted separately. Unfortunately, much of that detail was lost forever when an over-zealous monk "cleaned" it, wiping off much more than just dust & grime.
Bedroom In Arles, Vincent Van Gogh (1888)
Considered one of history’s most famous oil artworks, Bedroom in Arles was also one of Van Gogh’s most personal pieces since it was a painting of his own room. Like some of his other pieces, Van Gogh describes his painting process in a letter addressed to his brother, detailing how he chose unusual colors to express calm and comfort. He also explained that he painted this masterpiece during a turbulent period in his life, when an illness left him bedridden for days.
I suspect that this looks 'fresher' than the room actually was. Still a fantastic work.
You say that, but does the stroke-work not drive your eye inward into the cramped portion of the painting? I feel ridiculous attaching such meaning without knowing for certain, but the entire painting goes from seeming spacious on the outskirts to condensing into a cramped focal point created bye the perspective of the portrait and the stroke-work leading your eye inward. I might just be desperate to find meaning in it, but the cramped focal point seems to emphasize how uncomfortable being stuck in the environment would ibe.
Load More Replies...Nude Descending A Staircase, No. 2, Marcel Duchamp (1912)
Surprisingly, this Marcel Duchamp painting was severely criticized and rejected by artists in the Cubist movement for being “too Futurist.” One even went as far as saying, “There is in my bathroom a really good Navajo rug which, on any proper interpretation of the Cubist theory, is a far more satisfactory and decorative picture.” Despite this, the painting is now celebrated as a modernist classic.
I think that this is quite a long way from Picasso's Cubist intentions. Possibly, a bit too far.
The number of butts and t*****s beg to differ. Picasso was a dirty ole b*****d.
Load More Replies...I actually adore this paint, even though I could care less about cubist works normally. Nothing about this painting makes me consider someone being n**e while descending a staircase, but I love the jarring nature of the work due to its earth metal tone that gets complimented by the intense contrast of the edge-work,. I'll be the first to admit that I couldn't even begin to guess the true meaning of the painting, but It just eels so captivating for some reason.
Sometimes, but rarely, an artist manages to paint movement. This is one of them
Load More Replies...It works for me, if only because it makes me nervous about tripping down the stairs.
Load More Replies...Drawing Xiii, Georgia O’keeffe (1915)
Georgia O’Keeffe is best known for her 20th-century series of charcoal drawings. Her work stood out from the rest at that time since she used natural, flowing forms, while other artists preferred to paint geometric shapes. Photographer Alfred Stieglitz liked her work so much that he exhibited some of her drawings in his gallery without getting O’Keeffe’s consent first. She confronted him, but agreed to let him keep them on display, a move that kick-started her successful career as an artist.
Um... isn't she best known for her brightly colored, vibrant, extreme close-ups of flowers (that people say are suggestive, but she always denied that was her intention), rather than her charcoal drawings?
32 Campbell’s Soup Cans, Andy Warhol (1962)
Andy Warhol’s “32 Campbell’s Soup Cans” paintings were an immediate hit and became part of the pop art movement. Warhol’s goal when creating this artwork was to blur the lines between fine art and mass production by challenging the traditional ideas of what art was at the time. When asked about his intent, Warhol said, “I only want to get you started thinking and feeling, like what's art?”
O never, and still don't, appreciated Warhol's works as paintings, but t even I can't deny that the points he made in his painting were potent. One of the few artists that I'm willing to admit that understanding the deeper meaning of the painting is not just preferred but required. I've always hated art that can be understood only with context provided by the painter, but he message's behind Warhol's paintings are one of few exceptions.
Although I understand and appreciate some of Warhol's works. I can help seeing this one as.... well. Lazy.
I appreciate this. I feel better educated but not talked down to.
Right? There are plenty of artworks the I don't understand, and it's great to be provided with the intended perspective to better understand them.
Load More Replies...The Fighting Temeraire by J M W Turner. I don't know why but I just think this is stunning. Turner-El-...f7e298.jpg
You have no idea how much I needed an article like this lol. Even with artworks I don't understand, it's nice to be able to consider what they COULD mean.
This is a wonderful article, and demonstrates a wide variety of works and styles. Whilst the observer might not like all of these works, myself being one of them, it is important to understand that this is the point of art. Some pieces are there as a true reflection of what is around the artist, such as the Jan Van Eyke, right through to the concept of what the artist perceives, such as the Marcel Duchamp. Art can be playful, evoke emotions or simply be nice to look at.
Whole-heartedly agree. It gives you something of a warm fuzzy feeling to be able to understand more about art that you otherwise wouldn't get, doesn't it?
Load More Replies...Why, why, why doesn't Boredpanda do more articles like this? I am so tired of AITA one sided gossip articles.
I can't help but bring up mention of Zdzisław Beksiński (if someone who speaks polish could correct my pronunciation. I know how to pronounce Beksiński, but have been pronouncing Zdzislaw as "Zids-is-law" and I have no idea if that's correct). Not the most popular artist, but often gets brought up as "That one horror artist from Poland" for the nature of his work. Oddly enough, he never considered his work to be horror art, he was just just trying to capture the dreamscape that he dreamt about. His dreamscape was pure nightmare fuel, but that's besides the point, I suppose. It has a very H.R. Giger feel to it, but with a much more earthy and warm feel to it than cold and metal. Mostly due to Beksiński's medium, if I recall. He painted on hardboard, if I recall. Heavily surreal, with a dirt-and-grime feel to it. As opposed to Giger, Beksiński's works seemed to focus, and I know he'd hate me using this to describe it, body horror aspect, often feature a more living and warped feel
And in the end my favorite artist was stabbed over refusing to loan a family member 500 dollars. Such a waste.
Load More Replies...I appreciate this. I feel better educated but not talked down to.
Right? There are plenty of artworks the I don't understand, and it's great to be provided with the intended perspective to better understand them.
Load More Replies...The Fighting Temeraire by J M W Turner. I don't know why but I just think this is stunning. Turner-El-...f7e298.jpg
You have no idea how much I needed an article like this lol. Even with artworks I don't understand, it's nice to be able to consider what they COULD mean.
This is a wonderful article, and demonstrates a wide variety of works and styles. Whilst the observer might not like all of these works, myself being one of them, it is important to understand that this is the point of art. Some pieces are there as a true reflection of what is around the artist, such as the Jan Van Eyke, right through to the concept of what the artist perceives, such as the Marcel Duchamp. Art can be playful, evoke emotions or simply be nice to look at.
Whole-heartedly agree. It gives you something of a warm fuzzy feeling to be able to understand more about art that you otherwise wouldn't get, doesn't it?
Load More Replies...Why, why, why doesn't Boredpanda do more articles like this? I am so tired of AITA one sided gossip articles.
I can't help but bring up mention of Zdzisław Beksiński (if someone who speaks polish could correct my pronunciation. I know how to pronounce Beksiński, but have been pronouncing Zdzislaw as "Zids-is-law" and I have no idea if that's correct). Not the most popular artist, but often gets brought up as "That one horror artist from Poland" for the nature of his work. Oddly enough, he never considered his work to be horror art, he was just just trying to capture the dreamscape that he dreamt about. His dreamscape was pure nightmare fuel, but that's besides the point, I suppose. It has a very H.R. Giger feel to it, but with a much more earthy and warm feel to it than cold and metal. Mostly due to Beksiński's medium, if I recall. He painted on hardboard, if I recall. Heavily surreal, with a dirt-and-grime feel to it. As opposed to Giger, Beksiński's works seemed to focus, and I know he'd hate me using this to describe it, body horror aspect, often feature a more living and warped feel
And in the end my favorite artist was stabbed over refusing to loan a family member 500 dollars. Such a waste.
Load More Replies...
