Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
My name is Alexander Forst, and I am a photographer from Berlin, living in Switzerland for 8 years now.
Some years ago, I decided to step up my night sky game and modify the sensor of my camera. The modification expands the light spectrum, which makes it possible to see the Ha emission nebulas in the night sky.
More info: lxphoton.com | alexander-forst.pixels.com | Instagram | Facebook | 500px.com
This post may include affiliate links.
#1
Final score:
106points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
Stacked/Tracked/Blended Sony A7iii Astromodified Sony A7Riii Unmodified Sony 35mm f1.4 Foreground: Iso 100 f3.2 30sec in moonshine Milkyway Iso 1600 f1.4 30sec Tracked
blobby_grrl 3 years ago
i think this is gonna be my background on every single device i own
Load More Replies...
I love stories and I love telling them using my pictures. However, the reason why I started photography was that I just wanted to take some good selfies. I still take selfies but nobody will recognize me there. Photography has become a lot more for me than a means to an end. It is the expression of my art, my feelings, and my fantasy. Since I can remember I love the stars and it was only natural to start with star photography.
RELATED:
#2
Final score:
84points
#3
Final score:
71points
My inspiration comes mostly from movies and also computer games. I don't take inspiration from other photographs that often and I cannot really tell why, but I think maybe because it is easier to get a story and a feeling from a movie or a game than it is from stills.
#4
Final score:
66points
mulk 3 years ago (edited)
why this picture has the same sky as another one? literally the SAME: same star luminosity, same position... and same cloud! That's not fair when you only said "modify the sensor of my camera. The modification expands the light spectrum, which makes it possible to see the Ha emission nebulas in the night sky": that's not the truth, you photoshopped some picture. for example: DSC5810-HD..._880-1.jpg 
VERSUS DSC4571-Be..._880-1.jpg 
EDIT: before upvote or downvote, please, read my other comments below
Nonya Bidness 3 years ago
The newer the photographer, the more often they do this. It's rather annoying. Is it so hard to be honest? Is it also so hard to NOT use the same sky samples on pictures? I get it, the night sky & milky way look cool, but not when people do this dumb stuff to it. It makes the pictures less alluring and I just stop looking.
Load More Replies...
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
Stacked/tracked/Blended A7iii Astromodified by Astrolab service Sony 35gm foreground: 1x iso 1600 f1.8 30sec 1x 15 sec (bracketing) Milkyway: 8x iso 1600 f1.6 30sec tracked
#5
Final score:
62points
Star photography requires a lot of patience. You need to plan everything beforehand. Everything has to be perfect. The location, the weather, the motive and the direction of the sky. But it's not only that. My pictures become more and more complex, so sometimes, it takes hours, even days, to edit a single photograph to get it just right. But the end result is always worth it.
#6
Final score:
57points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago (edited)
Stacked/Tracked/Composite A7iii Astromodified by Astrolab Service (Sky) A7riii Unmodified (Foreground) Sony 35mm gm Foreground: Iso 1600 f4 30sec, 15sec, 2sec Bracketing Sky: 8x Iso 1600 f1.8 30sec (same night different location)
#7
Final score:
52points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
Stacked/Tracked/Panon Exifs: A7iii Astromodified (milkyway) A7riii Unmodified (Foreground) foreground: 3x 8 Iso 1600, f4, 30sec, 35mm Sky: 3x8 iso 1600 f1.6, 30sec 35mm
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
its the maloja pass in switzerland
Load More Replies...If you'd like to see more photographs taken under the night sky you can find my older posts by clicking here, here, here and here.
#8
Final score:
47points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago (edited)
Stacked/Tracked/blended A7riii (Foreground) A7iii (Astromodified for Milkyway) Sony 20mm f1.8 (foreground) Sony 35mm f1.4 (Milkyway) Foreground: 8x Iso 1600 30sec f2 (focusstacked) Milkyway 8x Iso 1600 f2
#9
Final score:
46points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
Stacked Tracked Blended Pano Sony a7riii Sony a7iii astromodified Sony 35 f1.4 Foreground: 5x iso 640 30sec f4 Milkyway: 2 rows, 5 columns, 8 stacks iso 640 30sec f1.6
#10
Final score:
45points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
hills of switzerland. but the farmers dont allow anymore to go there
Load More Replies... #11
Final score:
44points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
stacked/tracked/blended/pano Sony A7riii Sony a7iii astromodified by @astrolab service Sony 35 f1.4 Foreground: 2x panel f2 iso 1600 30sec Milkyway: 2x panel 8x stack iso 1600 30sec tracked
#12
Final score:
40points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago (edited)
Exifs Stacked/Tracked/Blended/Pano The sky is Fully Tracked and stacked in 1 Row 4 Columns, 10 Stacks each Frame with an overlaping of around 60%. Shots were taken with an astromodified a7iii and the Sony 35 f1.4 GM lens and a ioptron sky tracker pro (iso 1600, f1.6, 30sec Tracked/Stacked) The moon is an hdr out of 3 shots
PKMN Trainer Link 3 years ago
I kinda wanna be a photographer but all that technological stuff scares me
Load More Replies...
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
that is orion. it looks like that for the next million years
Load More Replies... #13
Final score:
38points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
theese where taken mostly in switzerland. this is the landwasser viaduct
Load More Replies...
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
Stacked/Tracked/blended A7riii foreground A7iii (Astromodified) Milkyway Sony 35mm f1.4 GM foreground: 20x iso 3200 f1.6 15-30sec train: iso 3200 f1.4 1/100 lights: 2x iso 6400 1/3 f.14 Milkyway 8x iso 1600 f1.6 30
#14
Final score:
38points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago (edited)
stacked tracked composite Sony Ariii Sigma 85mm f1.4 (foreground) Sony 20mm f1.4 (milkyway) Foreground: 1x iso 400 f4 1/100sec Milkyway: 8x iso 1600 f2 30sec
#15
Final score:
37points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
it was a helicopter with searching lights, flying over me while i took that shot. it was a bit blurry thats why i put the ufo there
Load More Replies...
#16
Final score:
37points
Alex Forst (Submission author) 3 years ago
Stacked/Tracked/Blended Sony a7iii Astromodifed Sony A7riii unmodified Laowa 15mm f2 Foreground: 8x Iso 1600 f2 30sec Milkyway: 8x Iso 1600 f2 30sec
Add New Image
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Alex Forst (Post author) 3 years ago (edited)
Eplaining of the Exifs: Stacked: Multiple shots overlayed for Noise Control and increasing details. Tracked: The Camera was standing on a device which rotates syncron with the stars. Blended: The shots where taken from the same Tripod location. Composite:: The shots where not taken from the same tripod location. Single: A single image. braketing: different exposure times for brighter lights
John Beck 3 years ago
As a professional Astronomer, allow me to take some burden of explanation off of Alex Frost. Stacking and Tracking refer to a 2 step process to produce images of very faint objects in the night sky. First is tracking- using a clock-drive motor on the telescope or camera mount to keep it aimed at the object while multiple images are taken. Second is stacking which combines those images, registering - or aligning - them to remove any errors in tracking and then combining them (perhaps averaging them) on a pixel by pixel basis. Obviously, images of anything on the Earth will be blurred and distorted by this process - so all that is removed. Later, an in focus image of the foreground landscape may be added - this results in a composite image. It isn't a photograph. Almost all Astronomy "pictures" for the public are composite images. Pro Astronomers, like me, lack artistic skills to do this. We thank & admire folks like Alex Frost for sharing the beauty of Astronomy!
Alex Forst (Post author) 3 years ago (edited)
thank you for your explanation. but one thing really borther me here. why is a blending/compsite image not a photograph? collages (which are composites and blendings are) are a part of phtography since photography exists. so why also the "downgrade" away from photograpy. yes it is not documentation from an exact moment. but that isnt deep sky as well and documentation is is also just a part of photography and not the definition. and specialy a blending is more a hdr as it is a collage. as long the technique is not developed that we can use cameras with noise free 40 stops dynamic at iso 6400 we need phtography techniques to make pictures like that possible. thanks from making me an artist, but i m also a protographer and this is photography. the human eye and the brain btw is doing the exact same thing like a blending for increasing the dynamic range to about 24 stops. bendings, tracking, stacking and so on are a technique of photography. nothing more and nothing less. SO please. when you say this is not a photograph, please note that this is your personal opinion and goes against the official definition of photography
Load More Replies...
Matthew Stark 3 years ago
Alex, you've created masterpieces! Thank you for sharing your art. I'll have to share this with my family whose all last names are Forst. Cousins so many times removed? Lol! Please share more of your beautiful pieces.
Ashley Shelton 3 years ago
I wish you lived close to me I would get u to do our photos every year you are magnificent. These are so beautiful and you did such an amazing job!
John Beck 3 years ago (edited)
Hey guys. Alex has shared some beautiful artistic photographs of the night sky and some of you try to reduce what he has done based on a vague understanding of how he did it. Some of you may have heard of Ansel Adams, a renown photographer who worked in Black & White (search for his name if you don't know him). He spent much more time in the darkroom than behind the camera for each of his iconic photographs. Anyone who said Adams' photographs were not real photos or were not legit because of his darkroom techniques would be laughed at and dismissed as ignorant. Alex is a digital photographer and his darkroom is a computer - his photos are legit. Please do not use your ignorance to denigrate his photographs.
Alex Forst (Post author) 3 years ago (edited)
Eplaining of the Exifs: Stacked: Multiple shots overlayed for Noise Control and increasing details. Tracked: The Camera was standing on a device which rotates syncron with the stars. Blended: The shots where taken from the same Tripod location. Composite:: The shots where not taken from the same tripod location. Single: A single image. braketing: different exposure times for brighter lights
John Beck 3 years ago
As a professional Astronomer, allow me to take some burden of explanation off of Alex Frost. Stacking and Tracking refer to a 2 step process to produce images of very faint objects in the night sky. First is tracking- using a clock-drive motor on the telescope or camera mount to keep it aimed at the object while multiple images are taken. Second is stacking which combines those images, registering - or aligning - them to remove any errors in tracking and then combining them (perhaps averaging them) on a pixel by pixel basis. Obviously, images of anything on the Earth will be blurred and distorted by this process - so all that is removed. Later, an in focus image of the foreground landscape may be added - this results in a composite image. It isn't a photograph. Almost all Astronomy "pictures" for the public are composite images. Pro Astronomers, like me, lack artistic skills to do this. We thank & admire folks like Alex Frost for sharing the beauty of Astronomy!
Alex Forst (Post author) 3 years ago (edited)
thank you for your explanation. but one thing really borther me here. why is a blending/compsite image not a photograph? collages (which are composites and blendings are) are a part of phtography since photography exists. so why also the "downgrade" away from photograpy. yes it is not documentation from an exact moment. but that isnt deep sky as well and documentation is is also just a part of photography and not the definition. and specialy a blending is more a hdr as it is a collage. as long the technique is not developed that we can use cameras with noise free 40 stops dynamic at iso 6400 we need phtography techniques to make pictures like that possible. thanks from making me an artist, but i m also a protographer and this is photography. the human eye and the brain btw is doing the exact same thing like a blending for increasing the dynamic range to about 24 stops. bendings, tracking, stacking and so on are a technique of photography. nothing more and nothing less. SO please. when you say this is not a photograph, please note that this is your personal opinion and goes against the official definition of photography
Load More Replies... Matthew Stark 3 years ago
Alex, you've created masterpieces! Thank you for sharing your art. I'll have to share this with my family whose all last names are Forst. Cousins so many times removed? Lol! Please share more of your beautiful pieces.
Ashley Shelton 3 years ago
I wish you lived close to me I would get u to do our photos every year you are magnificent. These are so beautiful and you did such an amazing job!
John Beck 3 years ago (edited)
Hey guys. Alex has shared some beautiful artistic photographs of the night sky and some of you try to reduce what he has done based on a vague understanding of how he did it. Some of you may have heard of Ansel Adams, a renown photographer who worked in Black & White (search for his name if you don't know him). He spent much more time in the darkroom than behind the camera for each of his iconic photographs. Anyone who said Adams' photographs were not real photos or were not legit because of his darkroom techniques would be laughed at and dismissed as ignorant. Alex is a digital photographer and his darkroom is a computer - his photos are legit. Please do not use your ignorance to denigrate his photographs.
You May Like 86 Photography Hacks To Take Your Photos To The Next Level Most Famous Female Photographers Of The World 50 Amazing Pics Of Our World You Probably Haven’t Seen Before
Aivaras Kaziukonis
Justina Čiapaitė
Shelly Fourer
Related on Bored Panda
