Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Doctors Puzzle How Person Gained 40lbs, See Them Fiddling With Tic-Tacs: “They’re 0 Calories”
49

“400-800+ Calories Per Day Of Tic-Tacs”: Person Learns The Truth About ‘0 Calorie’ Sweets

Doctors Puzzle How Person Gained 40lbs, See Them Fiddling With Tic-Tacs: “They're 0 Calories” Man Gains 40 Lbs In A Year, Doesn’t Realize It Was Because He Ate 2 Packs Of Tic Tacs Every DayPerson Gets A Reality Check After ‘0 Calorie’ Tic-Tacs Lead To 40lb Weight Gain“400-800+ Calories Per Day Of Tic-Tacs”: Person Learns The Truth About ‘0 Calorie’ SweetsMan Thinks Tic Tacs Are 0 Calories, Accidentally Gains 40 LbsMan Confuses Dietitian By Gaining 40 Lbs Seemingly Out Of Nowhere, Turns Out It's The Tic TacsMan Suddenly Gains 40 Lbs And Doesn’t Know Why, Finally Figures Out That Tic Tacs Have CaloriesPerson Shocked At How Much Their 0 Calorie ‘Fruit Adventure’ Tic-Tac Binge Led To Weight GainDietician Tries To Figure Out How Man Gained 40 Lbs, Realizes It Was Just From Eating Tic TacsMan Downs 2 Containers Of Tic Tacs A Day Thinking They Have 0 Calories, Ends Up Gaining 40 Lbs
ADVERTISEMENT

Eating should be one of the simplest things we do as humans. We feel hungry, so we make ourselves food. Then we have energy to go about our day. Easy peasy, right? Well, we all know that our food systems have become more and more complicated over time, with commercial agriculture, processed food products and confusing ingredients that are utterly unpronounceable. And of course, we also have misleading nutrition labels!

One man recently learned the hard way that we can’t always trust exactly what is written on food labels. Below, you’ll find the full story that he shared on Reddit detailing how he figured out that Tic Tacs do in fact have calories, as well as some of the replies that amused readers left him. 

This man was thrilled when he saw that Tic Tacs are labeled as 0 calories per serving

Image credits: David Woo / pexels (not the actual photo)

But after gaining a significant amount of weight, he decided to get to the bottom of where it was coming from

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Amy / pexels (not the actual photo)

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Andres Ayrton / pexels (not the actual photo)

Later, he added a few more details about the situation

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: DumpsterPuff

The man also answered a couple of questions from readers to provide more context

Customers often have trouble deciphering nutrition labels on food

I had probably never looked at a food label in my life until I was about 18 years old. When I went vegan, however, I was suddenly obsessed with reading labels to ensure that I didn’t accidentally purchase any food items with sneaky amounts of milk powder, eggs, butter or honey hiding inside. But although I was looking specifically at the ingredients, I couldn’t help but glance at the nutrition labels too. And I soon realized just how confusing they are.

For example, a frozen pizza might say that it’s 180 calories per serving, with one serving being a third of the pizza. But then when I looked at the calories per container, it would say 620 calories. I’m no math whizz, but it was clear that something wasn’t adding up. And apparently, I’m not the only one who finds these labels unnecessarily confusing. According to the USDA, nearly 80% of shoppers in the United States actually do consult the nutrition labels before buying food items.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, a survey from Attest that asked participants to identify which cereal bar was the healthiest choice out of six options found that only 9% of them could actually identify the best option. In fact, 13% of participants actually chose the lowest ranking item in terms of health. It’s not surprising that the man in this story was confused about the calories present in Tic Tacs, especially when the FDA allows foods to be labeled as “calorie-free” as long as they have “less than 5 calories per RACC and per labeled serving.”

Image credits: Alabama Extension / pexels (not the actual photo)

The FDA allows products to be labeled calorie-free as long as they have less than 5 calories per serving

At the same time, food products in the US can be labeled fat-free, as long as they contain “less than 0.5 g per RACC and per labeled serving,” and sugar-free if they have “less than 0.5 g sugars per RACC and per labeled serving.” Sure, it might not make a big difference to your overall daily calories if you eat 5 Tic Tacs. But citizens rely on the government to ensure that they have access to accurate information about what’s going into their bodies, and we deserve transparency.

ADVERTISEMENT

When it comes to understanding nutrition labels on food in the United States, the FDA has broken the label down into four key parts: serving information, calories, nutrients and a quick guide to percent daily value. When it comes to serving size, they note that this is not actually a recommendation for how much you should eat, but rather how much people typically have of that item. For example, this might be the entire pack of a small bag of chips, or one fifth of a larger bag.

The caloric amount can also be confusing, as the first and largest number is typically an amount per serving, not per container. So be sure to check before assuming a whole slice of cake is only 200 calories. The nutrient section is important to know which ones to get less of, as well as which ones to get more of. The FDA recommends cutting down on saturated fat, sodium and added sugars as much as possible. Finally, the percent daily value can help us understand approximately how much of each nutrient we should try to get in the rest of the day.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Pavel Danilyuk / pexels (not the actual photo)

It’s important for consumers to learn how to read food labels without being misled

While we would like to assume that the government isn’t trying to trick us when creating nutrition labels on food items, we can’t say that they’re always 100% straightforward either. For example, the FDA allows the calorie count listed on food products to be up to 20% inaccurate, which can make a difference if you’re closely counting calories for weight loss.

To make sure that we aren’t tricked by food labels, Healthline has provided a few tips. First, they note that you should keep an eye out for the serving size listed on a food, as it will often be less than what you’ll actually eat. There are also plenty of buzzwords plastered all over food items to make them seem healthier or more appealing to customers. 

For example, “light” products might just be watered down, and “low-calorie” just means that it has one third less calories than the company’s original version. But this version might have the same amount of calories as another brand’s “original.” There are also dozens of different names for sugar (cane sugar, high-fructose corn syrup, agave nectar, coconut sugar, organic raw sugar, etc) that you probably should be aware of.

ADVERTISEMENT

We would love to hear your thoughts on this situation in the comments below, pandas. Have you ever been confused by food labels? Feel free to share, and then if you’re interested in reading another Bored Panda article discussing information about nutrition that many of us could benefit from hearing, look no further than right here

Image credits: Jack Sparrow / pexels (not the actual photo)

Amused readers shared their reactions to the tale, as well as some stories of their own that they were reminded of

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Share on Facebook
Adelaide Ross

Adelaide Ross

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Howdy, I'm Adelaide! I'm originally from Texas, but after graduating from university with an acting degree, I relocated to sunny Los Angeles for a while. I then got a serious bite from the travel bug and found myself moving to Sweden and England before settling in Lithuania about two years ago. I'm passionate about animal welfare, sustainability and eating delicious food. But as you can see, I cover a wide range of topics including drama, internet trends and hilarious memes. I can easily be won over with a Seinfeld reference, vegan pastry or glass of fresh cold brew. And during my free time, I can usually be seen strolling through a park, playing tennis or baking something tasty.

Read less »
Adelaide Ross

Adelaide Ross

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Howdy, I'm Adelaide! I'm originally from Texas, but after graduating from university with an acting degree, I relocated to sunny Los Angeles for a while. I then got a serious bite from the travel bug and found myself moving to Sweden and England before settling in Lithuania about two years ago. I'm passionate about animal welfare, sustainability and eating delicious food. But as you can see, I cover a wide range of topics including drama, internet trends and hilarious memes. I can easily be won over with a Seinfeld reference, vegan pastry or glass of fresh cold brew. And during my free time, I can usually be seen strolling through a park, playing tennis or baking something tasty.

Gabija Saveiskyte

Gabija Saveiskyte

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Hi there! I am a Visual Editor at Bored Panda. My job is to ensure that all the articles are aesthetically pleasing. I get to work with a variety of topics ranging from all the relationship drama to lots and lots of memes and, my personal favorites, funny cute cats. When I am not perfecting the images, you can find me reading with a cup of matcha latte and a cat in my lap, taking photos (of my cat), getting lost in the forest, or simply cuddling with my cat... Did I mention that I love cats?

Read less »

Gabija Saveiskyte

Gabija Saveiskyte

Author, BoredPanda staff

Hi there! I am a Visual Editor at Bored Panda. My job is to ensure that all the articles are aesthetically pleasing. I get to work with a variety of topics ranging from all the relationship drama to lots and lots of memes and, my personal favorites, funny cute cats. When I am not perfecting the images, you can find me reading with a cup of matcha latte and a cat in my lap, taking photos (of my cat), getting lost in the forest, or simply cuddling with my cat... Did I mention that I love cats?

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
WindySwede
Community Member
6 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

it so strange that it's allowed to write it has zero calories, just because of serving 1! tic is under 5 kcal?!! Corporate US do what they can to be illusive?

G R
Community Member
6 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I just checked a box of UK tic tacs and the nutritional info says 392kcal per 100g.

Load More Replies...
Petra Schaap
Community Member
6 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

so "zero calories" would be the excuse to eat 100s of tictacs a day??? it never occurred to him that it might be unhealty anyway?? O_O

Flora Porter
Community Member
6 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He's not alone. I used to have a gym-obsessed boyfriend who thought he could eat as much as he liked as long as it was labelled 5% fat or less. Couldn't get his head around the fact that if you eat 1kg at a sitting, that's actually 50g of fat.

Load More Comments
WindySwede
Community Member
6 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

it so strange that it's allowed to write it has zero calories, just because of serving 1! tic is under 5 kcal?!! Corporate US do what they can to be illusive?

G R
Community Member
6 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I just checked a box of UK tic tacs and the nutritional info says 392kcal per 100g.

Load More Replies...
Petra Schaap
Community Member
6 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

so "zero calories" would be the excuse to eat 100s of tictacs a day??? it never occurred to him that it might be unhealty anyway?? O_O

Flora Porter
Community Member
6 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

He's not alone. I used to have a gym-obsessed boyfriend who thought he could eat as much as he liked as long as it was labelled 5% fat or less. Couldn't get his head around the fact that if you eat 1kg at a sitting, that's actually 50g of fat.

Load More Comments
You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda