Artist Creates Amazing 3D Tattoos That Will Make You Look Twice

Can confirm.

Granted :o)

HAHAHAHAHAHAH No no no, very incorrect.

Look. I can keep throwing sources at you, but we wouldn’t get anywhere. With just a simple google search, one can find a host of reliable sources pointing my way, which indicate that, while maybe not naturally, men can breastfeed with hormone spikes. I will reconsider my argument if you or anybody else is willing and able to provide sources of reasoning against me, instead of simply blatantly saying that I am incorrect. My apologies for any insult I may be displaying, or if I am somehow being inappropriate. Please let me know if I am offending you in any way, but I enjoy finding new ways to upset the patriarchal paradigm. I do not wish to insult anybody, and I will gladly rescind my statement if I deem to be proven incorrect. Thank you, and have a nice day.

https://www.livescience.com/45732-can-men-lactate.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male_lactation

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/strange-but-true-males-can-lactate/

Hmmmmm wow. I was in a pissy mood that day. thanks for this it really opened my eyes

Its a matter of cultural acceptance/normalization not legal rights. Its not socially acceptable for men to be shirtless in public places where its considered rude like a restaurants, most stores, public buildings, museums or places of culture. Women's breast are considered sexual organs by neuroscientist since they play an important role in "most* female sexual stimulation. Male and female breasts are not the same biologically which leads to them not being viewed the same socially. Female nips don't generally bother me, but I don't want to see them completely socially desexualized just for the sake of political correctness, no need to deny biology and human sexuality just so we can socially pretend male and female body's aren't different.

No problem, its always good to take social movements and their ideals out of context and look at the bigger picture. Its easy to get wrapped up or confused by all the social shouting going on these days. I'm all for feminism but not when it negates biological or logical truths. Men and women are different, but obviously these natural differences don't mean we are automatically unequal in our worth as human beings or citizens; however third wave feminism tends to treat these biological differences as a detriment and in order to make us "equal" its necessary to deny them in certain instances (especially in matters of male/female sexual relations and procreation) for the sake of "the movement", and that's utter nonsense in my opinion. TLDR: Female breasts ARE biologically sexual, male breasts are not, its up to the culture to decide the social morays tied to this fact. Sorry, I have a lot of opinions on various subjects lol

Really it's just the concept of it. All those friggin feminist who want equal rites and stuff. Girls cover boys dont. That's not equal. What are they trying to prove here? It's just a confusing mess.