Often, it feels like humans are one bunch of totally unpredictable beings. So finding out the answers to questions about our behavior requires some serious measures.
Would we go mad if we read too much bad news daily? Would we take the stairs over an escalator? Would we slow down on the roads if we get rewarded for driving safely? In order to find out, Bored Panda compiled some of the most interesting experiments on human behavior that brought various results, some of which were illuminating, and some—totally unexpected.
But at least we got a teeny tiny step closer to finding out just what’s going on in that odd and magical place called the brain.
This post may include affiliate links.
If A Field Is Left Unattended, Would People Steal Agricultural Produce, Or Would They Pay For It?
Idea: The self-service fields that run by the roads mean anyone is invited to pick whatever they please in the field, whether it’s fruits, vegetables, or flowers. There is no vendor to control the transactions. The sign with a price tag and a box to put money in is all there is to make a purchase for whatever it is that people picked in the fields.
Result: Not only were no thefts reported, but people would pay even more than the price tags asked.
Self-pick flowers are all over the German countryside, as well as little farm stands ranging from small huts to simply tables with everything from pumpkins to eggs to liverwurst on them with a money can. I assume this means most people are honest (or dishonest people stay in cities).
Naw, we do have thieves, just not that many. If ou want to consider yourself a decent person, you won't steal (well, except for tweaking your tax return a little bit)
Load More Replies.....but the sign literally says "field and cash register are monitored" :D
Bad photo choice. But these fields are commonly in Germany and most times not monitored. I also have seen this for example with sale of honey and potatoes in Denmark.
Load More Replies...The fact no thefts were reported doesn't mean they didn't happen. Firstly noone would probably notice if someone took one or two small pumpkins. Still even if noticed (doubt that) who would seriously go and report it? I guess noticable is that the whole pile wasn't stolen away. Anyway, I think the experiment was great and only proved that most people act with kindness when being trusted. I only hope the farmers continued with this idea.
We do this in rural Iowa. And if someone "stole" food its probably bc they needed it.
Vegetable stands with honor-system payment are common in rural Virginia.
Yup, plenty of these here in Denmark. A little does get stolen, but not enough for us to quit. Gardens are mostly open with no fences in the countryside, or in cities , no gates. Here I leave my door unlocked when going dor groceries, so I dont have to put down bags to open again , and my British partner was gobsmacked , when he found out, dropping his jaw to the floor 😄.
I would like to see the same experiment run with inflated prices. People tend to be honest when they believe they are being treated fairly. However when people feel they are being treated unfairly they are more likely to act dishonestly. Also people tend to not want to "shortchange" in a system like this and I would expect some of the overpayment is due to a lack of proper change.
Absolutely! The key here is affordability. If people are poor and hungry, the chances of stealing increases. Even an honest person might be forced to pay less than the stated price if they don't have enough but need the food items. I find this experiment only a reflection of relatively stable economy/society.
Load More Replies...How Do People See Themselves, And How Are They Seen By Strangers?
Idea: The “Real Beauty Sketches” experiment conducted by Dove asked women to describe themselves to an FBI forensic artist, who drew their portraits based solely on the description. Then, strangers described the appearance of the same women, and the artist drew another set of portraits of them. Each participant was given two portraits of themselves that turned out to be radically different.
Result: The portraits based on the strangers’ descriptions were clearly more beautiful, happier, and more accurate. An average person tends to exaggerate her own flaws, while strangers see the appearance as a whole, focusing on positive features.
“What has stayed with me are the emotional reactions the women had when they viewed the composite sketches hung side by side. I think many of these brave women realized that they had a distorted self-perception that had affected parts of their lives in significant ways,” said the FBI forensic artist.
This is awesome. Dove recorded this in a commercial back in 2013. There has been 69 million views since there. https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=XpaOjMXyJGk
Load More Replies...Not surprised. In the US, women are subjected to a constant barrage of advertising designed to make them feel unattractive so they'll buy beauty products. It's a massive industry - and a very effective form of brainwashing.
I wonder how that experiment would turn out when done with men. Women tend to be far more critical of their appearance thanks to society being judgemental.
i just went and watched the video again, saw it years ago. still hits home
Have compassion for yourself, then you will have compassion for others. - the lesson in Buddhist walking meditation.
True. If I look in the mirror in passing it seems to me to be prettier because I don't give myself time to see the flaws
Carlsberg Social Experiment
Idea: In this social experiment by the Danish brewery Carlsberg, the subjects, unsuspecting couples out to watch a movie, walk into a crowded cinema. There are only 2 seats remaining, right in the middle, with each of the rest taken by a rather tough-looking and tattooed male biker.
Result: As the informal experiment (which was actually intended to be just an advertisement) unfolds, not all of the couples end up taking a seat, and upon seeing the bikers decide to leave immediately. Some couples do choose to take their seats however, and are rewarded with cheers from the crowd and a round of free Carlsberg beers. The experiment was a good example of why people shouldn't always judge a book by its cover.
Video
If I walked into a theater full of biker dudes I'd wonder if I was mislead about the rating of the cartoon I was about to see.
Mouhahahaha, imagine a theater full of biker for snow queen xD. I'd be WTF
Load More Replies...I wouldn't have walked out because they look tough, I grew up in biker bars, but I might have walked out because crowds make me very uncomfortable and that's way too many people in one place. Had I walked out for my own reason, I might have been judged as having judged people wrongly even though that was not my reason for leaving.
also plus if thats happened now id be like no covid alert
Load More Replies...If I walked into a crowded theater and only two seats in the middle were not taken, I don't care if it was a bunch of preschoolers, I would nope it out of there because I hate crowds and large gatherings of people (pre-pandemic included). Also, I am claustrophobic and NEED an aisle seat to be comfortable enough to enjoy myself (or at least one side without a person)
I wish I could upvote you a hundred times! The experiment is very flawed in assuming that there is only one reason why people wouldn't take the middle seats - they are middle seats! The cheering would just be additional punishment... when I enter a theater late I want to make no fuss, please act like I am but a shadow...
Load More Replies...I spent many years as lead singer of a local band. I would rather play a bar full of bikers, even of different clubs, than a bar full of college students. The bikers were always really sweet and always helped us carry out our heavy equipment. There was never any trouble. The college students tend to spill their drinks everywhere, including putting them on our speakers while they danced, and constantly tried to grab my mic out of my hand or jump on stage. I also bartended at a biker bar. They took turns walking me to my vehicle at 2am to make sure I was safe.
I'd be worried about the number of people in that room. But I have anxiety
Not taking the seats doesn’t mean a person is prejudiced against tough looking bikers. I wouldn’t because I’m not a tiny person and I hate brushing past any person. And how about claustrophobic persons? Don’t judge a person by their actions. How about we just stop judging each other altogether?
What Will Happen If All Foreign Products Are Removed From Supermarket Shelves?
Idea: As part of a campaign against xenophobia, the prejudice against people from other countries, supermarket 'Edeka' in Hamburg, Germany launched a social experiment. Supermarket employees removed all the foreign-made products from the shelves and left only those that were made within the country.
Result: Supermarket customers were greeted by empty shelves and helped raise awareness about how different and lower-quality life in Germany would be without cooperation with other countries. The experiment also shows that foreigners can add value to our lives even on a domestic scale.
This should show the dangers of a global supply chain. Even stuff that is made local has ingredients from around the planet.
True, but if i think it illustrates the point that a lot of people want to use foreign markets and good but don't actually want the ppl who make it.
Load More Replies...This is what our shops would look like as well. Less than 10% of products are 100% Australian made/owned.
Yep. The international borders being closed during COVID have highlighted exactly how much we rely on foreign imports.
Load More Replies...Very revealing of xenophobia, but also dangerous levels of reliance on foreign produce and in turn, on the environment. A country that is able to produce say 9/10ths of its own food is much better protected against war, trade embargoes etc. And crops grown locally have a much smaller carbon footprint and therefore they're better for the environment. Although massive crop failure might make negotiations for food worrying. I guess it's all about balance, acceptance and equality.
They're running the same experiment in the UK at the moment, it's called Brexit, as of the 1st of January 2021 we'll see limited supplies of foreign goods on our shelves.
I live in an EU country (one of the poorer ones). Here the government are trying to include more locally produced items in supermarkets. Their rationale is to both help local producers and to reduce the carbon footprint of stocked items. Unfortunately the EU has decided this is illegal.
PLEASE get Edeka over in Bible Belt America. PLEASE. Show them that what they love is made from people they hate.
Rosenhan Experiment
Idea: In his 1973 paper “On Being Sane in Insane Places”, psychologist David Rosenhan strongly criticized the psychiatric hospitals and the treatment the patients received there, but most of all, he criticized the quality of the psychiatric diagnosis. Rosenhan's stance was based on research conducted by himself and seven other experimenters who acted as pseudo-patients in different hospitals around the U.S. where they were all diagnosed with psychiatric disorders.
To be admitted into the hospitals, the pseudo-patients complained about auditory hallucinations. After admission, however, they behaved perfectly normal, telling the medical staff in the hospitals that their hallucinations had disappeared.
Result: The medical staff in the hospitals still regarded the pseudo-patients as mentally ill and fed them antipsychotic meds.
The pseudo-patients would flush the medications down the toilet, and continue acting in a calm, rational fashion, writing down their observations of the staff and the other patients. However, they were still treated as having mental problems. Instead of investigating the issue, nobody regarded their behavior as normal, because apparently inside the walls of a psychiatric hospital, the only sane ones are the employees.
I wonder if Rosenhan had read Chekhov's "Ward No. 6".
I always wondered this about a psychiatric hospital. How do you convince them that you are now cured, better? To be committed involuntarily must be frightening to some people. And imagine back in the day when women would be committed for “hysteria” while simply having PMS.
Basically, you can get into a psych ward, but good friggin' luck getting *out*. To this day.
Load More Replies...Read "10 Days in a Madhouse" by Nellie Bly. She had herself committed to show exactly this issue.
Exactly! Nellie Bly was the first to do this, and considered ground-breaking in the field of investigative journalism. It's amazing how many times and on how many platforms the historical contributions of women (and POC) are not included. Smh
Load More Replies...Sadly this is STILL true today. In psychiatric wards patients are spoken ABOUT not spoken TO. Decisions are made without referencing the patient and outpatient psychiatric treatment is barely any better. Basically if you're IN hospital you're not getting out for a while no matter how sane you are. If you're getting outpatient treatment you're not a concern unless you've been hospitalised with a suicide attempt. However, if you have a substance abuse issue you will likely find it next to impossible to get ANY treatment - except for physical injury had during suicide attempts. People asking for help are turned away and often DO take their own lives if they have had substance abuse issues - I have personally seen ALL of this happen..
Old joke re psych wards: How do you tell the patients from the Dr's? The Dr's have the keys ...
“Experts” are only expert in their field of choice. If doctors had their way, we would all wear bubble wrap, never travel in a car or airplane, motorcycles would be banned and grocery stores would only have protein & veggies. Also, no one would be able to defend themselves.
The "Violinist In The Metro" Experiment
Idea: On 12th January 2007, about a thousand morning commuters passing through a subway station in Washington, D.C. were, without publicity, treated to a free mini-concert performed by violin virtuoso Joshua Bell, who played for approximately 45 minutes, performing six classical pieces (two of which were by Bach), on his handcrafted 1713 Stradivarius violin (for which Bell reportedly paid $3.5 million).
Result: Only 6 people stopped and stayed to listen for a while. About 20 gave him money but continued to walk their normal pace. He collected $32. When he finished playing and silence took over, no one noticed it. No one applauded, nor was there any recognition. No one noticed that one of the best musicians in the world had played one of the most intricate pieces ever written with a violin worth 3.5 million dollars. The experiment raised some interesting questions about how we not only value beauty, but extent that which the setting and presentation make a difference. Three days earlier, Bell had played to a full house at Boston’s Symphony Hall, where seats went for over $100. (Source: Snopes)
And what does this prove? That people walking through subway stations are busy and have places to be and don't have time to stand around listening to someone playing violin.
Comparing it to the concert is a fallacy as well. The people who attended that concert were people who liked violin music and thus went out of their way to listen to it.
Load More Replies...Other people have said it better than me, but an artist making $40 an hour sounds like a sweet gig, especially since "morning commute" implies people on their way to their own jobs, unable to stop without risking their livelihoods. The fact that he got such a positive reception is great, and even if nobody clapped I'm sure he brightened a lot of people's days.
Did they ask how many of those people walking past had acknowledged the beauty internally, but couldn't stop because they'd be late, and maybe fired, and there's rent to pay and kids to feed? Did they consider that beauty is culturally defined and contingent? I love Bach, but if buddy here played this in my bedroom while I was trying to sleep I'd invite him to kindly stuff it.
Not to argue or anything, but i actually think its does say something. We decided that his music was worth 3.5 million dollars when he played it at concerts, but decided it was only worth 32 dollars when played in a subway station. This shows that humans rely on packaging to decide what has value and what doesn’t. I think that is actually really cool
Load More Replies...Pick a different place for this experiment and do it again! When the excellent flute player is in my underground station some people always linger to listen.
If he played in a park where people had time to sit and listen, it would have been different. When he played that concert where seats went for over $100, was it at 10am on a workday?
In early '17 I took my mom then my husband to NYC. We stayed in Times Square. I loved stopping and watching and listening to street performers. I always tossed at least a paper single, good or bad. Both my husband and mom did not care for them. They got impatient with me and we were never on a time schedule.
What Will Happen If A Piano Staircase Is Installed Near An Escalator?
Idea: In another experiment from Volkswagen’s Fun Theory campaign, a regular staircase was replaced with a musical one. By stepping on the stairs, a person would play their own melody on a gigantic piano. The idea was to make people take the stairs instead of an escalator.
Result: The musical stairs, which were right next to an escalator, were used 66% more than normal as people took their time playing a tune. The idea quickly blew up around the globe and became installed in Kuala Lumpur, Seoul, San Francisco, Mexico City, Sarajevo, Vienna, and other cities.
While this is interesting, I am rather sure this effect unfortunately wanes with regular pedestrians.
Yeah, people will get tired of the piano stairs if they pass through every day.
Load More Replies...This is a fun idea, but only for less frequented stairs. If I had to pass those stairs every morning with a huge crowd of commuters, the cacophony of noise would be stressful.
Now you can have your Tom Hanks moment. Remember, think Big! (Sorry, really sorry)
I got to play on those at FAO Schwartz during our Senior HS trip in 1990! Then as I walked to the bus parked near Trump tower a pigeon s**t on my head. My teacher had to help clean it out of my hair🤦🏻♀️
Load More Replies...And then they had to remove the one in San Francisco because the s**t kept getting stuck in the cracks.
It's probably fun the first few times, but if I had to go there every day, the noise would start bothering me.
oh my god I would get my friends together and get them on different parts of the staircase and play an anime theme or River Flows in You or something
How Much Are We Alike?
Idea: The travel search company Momondo asked 67 people from all over the world to take a DNA test. They wanted to prove that people have much more in common with other nationalities than one would think. Most participants were absolutely confident in their genetic roots, and some even had a level of prejudice against other nations.
Result: It turned out that not one of the total 67 people were purely one race or ethnicity. The experiment challenged participants’ beliefs about their and other peoples’ identities. Some participants were so impressed with the results they suggested running the same experiments as a way to get rid of xenophobia, racism, and national extremism.
I am trying so hard to remember the name of a doco I watched. They took DNA samples from a wide range of people and pretty much everyone’s DNA linked them to a single group of modern people from Africa. The group of people migrated and scattered across the world. It was a pretty interesting doco.
AH HA, found it https://knowpathology.com.au/2016/06/27/dna-on-sbs-tv-the-story-of-humankind-that-is-inside-all-of-us/
Load More Replies...I've read about neo-Nazis and other white supremacist jerks having their DNA tested so they could show off how "pure" they were, only to discover how much Black, Jewish, etc. DNA they had. 😂
I'm German several generations down, but with a non-German surname, very clearly from a language of an "inferior", "non-aryan" "race" ... guess which line of my family the biggest Nazi in my ancestry belonged to... 🙄
Load More Replies...The "Out of Africa" theory is the idea that all humans originated in Africa. They used DNA from herpes viruses to support it. Very interesting reads. The theory makes it clear that Humans are not "Native" to any one location on the Planet other than Africa. Though we are talking human evolution and movement from anywhere between 10,000-50,000 years ago, so the DNA evidence may not exist in modern people. I also find it fascinating that some peoples still show evidence of Neanderthal DNA.
I am the closest exception to this. I did the 23andme DNA test and am 99-100% Ashkenazi Jewish.
Smoke Filled Room Experiment
Idea: This experiment had people alone in a room filling out a questionnaire, when smoke starts coming from under the door. What do you do? You would get up and leave, tell someone in charge and do so without hesitation, right? Now imagine the same situation, except that you are not alone, you are with several other people who don't seem to care about the smoke. What do you do now?
Results: When alone, 75% of people reported the smoke almost immediately. The average time to report was 2 minutes of first noticing the smoke. However when two actors were present, who were working with the experimenters and told to act as if nothing was wrong, only 10% of the subjects left the room or reported the smoke. 9 out of 10 subjects actually kept working on the questionnaire, while rubbing their eyes and waving smoke out of their faces. The experiment was a great example of people responding slower (or not at all) to emergency situations in the presence of passive others. We seem to rely heavily on the responses of others even against our own instincts. If the group acts as if everything is OK then it must be, right? Wrong. Don't let the passivity of others result in your inaction. Don't always assume that someone else will help, that someone is specified to take action on behalf of others. Be the one to take action!
This also applis to other way around. If you need help, address people directly. "Hey you, the guy in the green shirt, please help me stop that bully from beating up the guy" will likely get a response, "Please help" not.
That's why in CPR training they tell you to single out 1 person to call an ambulance
Load More Replies...Ditto. Working in bars makes you used to calling 911 for various reasons. Now I live on a high accident corner so it's nothing fo me to be first on scene. There was a big accident in April where everyone else stayed in their cars and didn't help. I was in shorts and a T-shirt on the phone with 911 while helping another neighbor who also ran out to help the people.
Load More Replies...But, it’s in our instincts to go with the herd as well. We are followers, just like most species. When the herd reacts, the individual follows
One afternoon, our school custodian came to my open classroom door with a man I didn't recognize. The custodian told me I smelled smoke and what should I do? I turned to my fourth graders, and asked them, "What's the most important thing?" They all yelled, "Get out!" We had spent time on this at the beginning of the year. I said we would get out and pull the fire alarm. Turns out the man was our local fire chief and he told me to go ahead and do it. We were the very first class out the door!
I was in a movie theater that was about half filled. Half way through the movie the fire alarms went off. Everyone just sat there. It wasn't until I got up and said, "The alarm means you evacuate" that people finally started getting up. It was a false alarm, as we were informed as we entered the lobby area. We returned to the theater and watched the rest of the move (the theater rewound it to the point before the alarms went off) and as we exited after the end of the movie the ushers were handing us vouchers for a free movie to compensate us for our inconvenience. Still I can't get over the fact that people just sat there waiting for someone to tell them what to do while a fire alarm was blasting at full volume.
Wouldn't happen with me. I always assume that others around me are stupid and their opinions can't be trusted... It hasn't served me well.
How Does Music In A Taxi Affect Passengers?
Idea: Our surroundings and environment can affect how we (re)act. What's left to determine is to what extent. A taxi driver changed the music in his car, then noted how this affect his passengers' behavior, as well as his rating on the taxi app. The driver conducted his mini-experiments in week-long stretches; he'd switch up the music after 7 days. The results might just surprise some of you Pandas.
Result: The taxi driver noticed that his rating on the app dropped and rose depending on the type of music he was playing inside the cab. Rock music and retro songs caused his rating to fall. However, rap music affected his rating the most negatively. And while some customers enjoyed older hit songs, most people enjoyed a combination of classical music with a dash of rock. In the end, the taxi driver decided to play just classical music in his cab. That's because it gave his clients the most positive emotions and fattened up his wallet as a result: after all, happy customers leave better tips and reviews.
What about no music? I carry earplugs because music is playing everywhere and sometimes I just want to shop in peace.
I would prefer (contemporary) classical music or instrumental pieces as it's easier to daydream/let your mind drift off... imagine it would be intensified when not having to drive myself.
The "taxi driver" in the image above is actually talkshow host James Corden. And his passenger is Elton John. So, having this image with this text, is a little misleading.
What Will Happen If Some Drivers Are Penalized And Others Are Rewarded?
Idea: The “Fun Theory” campaign from Volkswagen aimed at getting people to change their behavior and do the right thing.
Part of the campaign was the speed camera lottery, which meant that when a car passed a specific crossing, the speed camera would take a picture of it and measure its speed. If the driver was above the speed limit, they would get a fine. But interestingly, the fine fund was used to cover the lottery price for obedient drivers.
Result: Previous to the speed camera lottery, the average speed on this part of the road was 20 miles per hour. After its launch, the speed was reduced by 22% to 15 miles per hour since drivers were much more motivated not to exceed the speed limit. As a result, The Swedish National Society for Road Safety installed a few such speed cameras along their national highways.
Has it occurred to anyone that America isn't the only mph country? As a kid, I'd see kmh/mph both in Canada; it's seen in the UK; and their dependent territories. So, y'know, ease up a bit? Please? I use metric and live in the US. I *think* metric and live in the US. I get it. I do. And yet, the article makes the point, so if the point was made, I think that's more important?
Load More Replies...How To Unite People With Different Views?
Idea: In a small scale social experiment by Heineken, as part of their ad campaign, 3 pairs of complete strangers with (secretly) wildly-differing views went to a warehouse. There, they built various constructions in pairs and asked each other questions that were prepared in advance by the event organizers. In the end, everyone finds out that their partner had completely opposite beliefs than their own. Everyone then decides if they want to talk to their partner over a bottle of beer.
Result: Among the 3 pairs of participants there was a supporter of the climate change theory and an skeptic; a feminist and a man holding conservative views; and a transgender individual, as well as a man against gender reassignment. In the end, friendship and curiosity prevailed, as every single person decided to drink a beer together, chatted, got to know each other, and deepened their knowledge about the questions they thought they had all figured out.
Video
Also this sounds romantic, I do not think these friendship will prevail. Getting people drunk and hope they hang out with each other is a bit too easy. Besides, getting drunken on Heineken is rather nasty.
At least they got them to talk to each other (instead of about each other) *shrug*. I don't think it would've worked if the meetings and conversations weren't one-on-one
Load More Replies...Never assume that a person with different views is not a good person. Assume, after all, makes an ass out of ‘u’ and ‘me’
Except for when their views involve hurting/devaluing you.
Load More Replies...This also explains why we're forgiving of friends and family with different views but not strangers.
We have an advert for an internet provider that does similar. 2 People are sat opposite sides of a screen and can’t see each other. They are asked a series of questions to get conversation going and then the screen goes up and they meet face to face. On one of the ads it is a butcher and a vegan, they don’t find that stuff out until the reveal.
It doesn't sound like the goal is to make the two strangers into lifelong friends. The nice thing is, after working together, two people of opposing views were generally willing to chat and get to know each other over a beer. I'm not from Germany, but this is probably as social a thing to do as to have a cup of coffee is in the United States.
The beer is highlighted, but it was the projects "the built various constructions" that brought them together enough to talk.
There would be no harm in sharing a beer with someone who espoused different views from me... imagine most of my acquaintances would fall into this category. My (few) good friends and I are a different matter- we have more in common.
It's much harder to hate close up. Once you see a person as a human being rather than an adjective, stereotypes tend to be replaced by understanding. Which will lead to tolerance, IMHO.
American political discussions can learn from this. Ill start I'm Greg and I am a currently serving African American that supports President Trump while not always agreeing with his every decision. ( I also intend to support Pres elect Biden even though I lean more to a republican side) Anyone wana have a beer?
False Memory Experiment
Idea: In 1974, Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer tried to investigate the effects of language on the development of false memory. The experiment involved two separate studies.
In the first test, 45 participants were randomly assigned to watch different videos of a car accident. The videos had shown collisions at 20 mph (32 km/h), 30 mph (48 km/h) and 40 mph (64 km/h). Afterwards, participants filled out a survey, which asked the question, "About how fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?" The question always asked the same thing, except the verb used to describe the collision varied. Rather than "smashed", other verbs used included "bumped", "collided", "hit", or "contacted". Participants estimated collisions of all speeds to average between 35 mph (56 km/h) to just below 40 mph (64 km/h). If actual speed was the main factor in estimate, it could be assumed that participants would have lower estimates for lower speed collisions. Instead, the word being used to describe the collision seemed to better predict the estimate in speed rather than the speed itself.
The second experiment also showed participants videos of a car accident, but the phrasing of the follow-up questionnaire was critical in participant responses. 150 participants were randomly assigned to three conditions. Those in the first condition were asked the same question as the first study using the verb "smashed". The second group was asked the same question as the first study, replacing "smashed" with "hit". The final group was not asked about the speed of the crashed cars. The researchers then asked the participants if they had seen any broken glass, knowing that there was no broken glass in the video. The responses to this question had shown that the difference between whether broken glass was recalled or not heavily depended on the verb used. A larger sum of participants in the "smashed" group declared that there was broken glass.
Result: In this study, the first point brought up in the discussion is that the words used to phrase a question can heavily influence the response given. Second, the study indicates that the phrasing of a question can give expectations to previously ignored details, and therefore, a misconstruction of our memory recall. This indication supports false memory as an existing phenomenon.
Interesting results, scary if used with ill intentions. We humans are so easily manipulated!
Especially scary when questioned by the police or questioned in court
Load More Replies...This is the exact reason defense attorneys have to pay such close attention to the questions that prosecutors ask. They will ask this type of leading question to get the answer they want to get a conviction. Court psychiatrists will also use these type of questions to "lead" a child or adult into "memories" that may or may not be true in order to "prove" their case.
The language used in questioning an individual can greatly influence their answers and affect memory
Load More Replies...What Will Happen If Network Users Are Given Freedom Of Actions And A Little Bit Of Free Space?
Idea: A creative collaborative project on Reddit invited internet users to draw on a blank online canvas by choosing pixels and changing their color. In order to color another pixel, each user had to wait for a 5-minute 'cooldown' to end or had to act as part of a group. While it might sound complicated, it led to a group of redditors, 'creators,' banding together to create intricate drawings. Meanwhile, other groups painted different parts of the blank canvas with the same color. So-called 'guardians' also sprang up who saw it as their role to 'protect' the canvas from any destructive misconduct.
Result: At the start of the 72-hour-long project, the 'creators' let their creativity and imagination loose to create complex drawings. All with the help of the 'guardians' who protected their artistic endeavors. Unfortunately, things didn't last. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The 'guardians' started to pick and choose which drawings to protect and which ones to leave open to the destructive forces of chaos. Eventually, this led to in-fighting. Some redditors began painting random pixels black and wreaking havoc where they could. However, just like a forest fire, this opened up the space for new drawings and creations.
OMG, I think I found that some years ago! I remember being in shock about how good the drawings were, unfortunately, mine was destroyed
This one is absolutely fantastic. I recommend everyone to watch the video with condensed time. It is stunning to see the "battles" but how the trolls do not ultimately prevail.
You have a warped concept of what a troll is. A troll is someone who purposely "triggers" people with deceit, and simply because they think that it's funny to manipulate people that way. What you are referring to is called competition, and it is perfectly normal and seen in every aspect of nature. You've got a warped sense of reality.
Load More Replies...What Will Happen If People Start Reading Bad News Every Day?
Idea: 689,003 Facebook users participated in a social experiment during which researchers wanted to see what would happen if people started reading bad news every day. For an entire week, some users had to view news posts which had negative information, some of which were incredibly stressful emotionally. The opposite was also tested out by using positive news instead of negative posts.
Result: Like a lot of us instinctively predicted, reading lots of negative news over 7 days changed Facebook users' behavior online. Not only were they more prone to posting similar information as in the negative news more often, they were also more likely to emphasize negative emotions. Meanwhile, positive news stories made people feel happier, act more compassionately and kindly towards others. In other words, the news that we consume on social media shapes how we react because, on some level, we feel that what we see and read happens to us in reality.
since few month i quit watching the news, newspaper, radio and news website. if i hadn't do that i don't think i'd still be here today. it help me a lot for now
Me too. Without daily news the life gets better. You can focus on the positive things that move you forward.
Load More Replies...My mom did this to herself on FB. Watched a negative vid, which led to another, and FB algorithms fed her nothing but crap from there. She wasn’t even registering just how much negative content was popping up. I finally made her join some dog groups (happy ones), watch silly videos, and look at pictures of kittens. The algorithms are starting to send her nicer content now. But good god she was absolutely miserable from watching the negative crap.
Is it possible to have a reference or a link for this study? Thanks.
It's literally linked under the text: [PNAS] https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/111/24/8788.full.pdf
Load More Replies...Again humans tend to dwell on bad news not good. "Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter. In a dark place we find ourselves, and a little more knowledge lights our way. Fear is the path to the dark side."--Master Yoda
In a way it is very easy. On this planet, every day countless horrible things happen. But countless fantastic things happen as well. While it is not advisable to close the eyes to easier, it will clearly make us happier to focus on the great stuff. Thus, let's visit BP more often, at least if neither TikTok nor Disney reimagination stories are posted.
One of the main reasons we don't watch the nightly news. I get small snippets throughout the day on my social media, so I have the option of reading (or viewing) them or not. Not being bombarded by the idiots who support Trump and all those "you're violating my constitutional rights" anti-masking morons makes for a much more pleasant day.
Facebook is an emotional rollercoaster. One story can have you laughing your ass off while the next will have you crying your eyes out. I have learned to take facebook in small quantities to save my sanity lol
Via neuroplasticity, we also are prone to seek out the sort of news we are used to, and come to crave.
How Much Does An Opinion Cost- A Little Or A Lot?
Study Conducted in 1957 at Stanford University
Idea: Cognitive dissonance is a concept that refers to a situation involving conflicting attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors. This conflict produces an inherent feeling of discomfort leading to a change in one of the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors to minimize or eliminate the discomfort and restore balance.
It was first investigated by Leon Festinger, after an observational study of a cult that believed that a flood will destroy the Earth. This study inspired an intriguing experiment, conducted by Leon Festinger and James Merrill Carlsmith. The researchers asked the participants to perform a series of dull tasks (such as turning pegs in a pegboard for an hour). Participants' initial attitudes toward this task were highly negative. They were then paid either $1 or $20 to tell a participant waiting in the lobby that the tasks were really interesting.
Result: Almost all of the participants agreed to walk into the waiting room and persuade the next participant that the boring experiment would be fun. When the participants were later asked to evaluate the experiment, the participants who were paid only $1 rated the tedious task as more fun and enjoyable than the participants who were paid $20 to lie. Being paid only $1 is not a sufficient incentive for lying and so those who were paid $1 experienced dissonance. They could only overcome that dissonance by coming to believe that the tasks really were interesting and enjoyable. Being paid $20 provides a reason for turning pegs and therefore, there's no dissonance.
Cognitive dissonance is one of the most powerful forces shaping our modern political landscape. Too many people shift their views based on group identity who independently wouldn't hold these views. Something to the effect of I'm a (political party) so I agree that climate change is (party's view).
And this is true for ALL political parties. If you aren't totally for us, you are against us.
Load More Replies...this is like the joke about the guy that dropped a quarter into an outdoor privy, and then dropped a 20$ bill down because "if you think i'm going down there for a quarter, you're crazy!"
Don't think it means what they think it means. Give ya a dollar to dupe the next guy IS fun. You feel like you're being naughty, like you're in on the joke. Give ya a twenty to dupe the next guy is NOT fun. Now the act of incentived immorality has weight. Now you're paying attention to why you're being paid.
Study Conducted In 1977 At Stanford University
Study Conducted in 1977 at Stanford University
Idea: A social psychology professor at Stanford University named Lee Ross conducted an experiment that focuses on how people can incorrectly conclude that others think the same way they do, or form a “false consensus” about the beliefs and preferences of others.
In the first part of the study, participants were asked to read about situations in which a conflict occurred and then were told two alternative ways of responding to the situation. They were asked to do three things:
- Guess which option other people would choose;
- Say which option they themselves would choose;
- Describe the attributes of the person who would likely choose each of the two options.
This phenomenon is referred to as the “false consensus effect”, where an individual thinks that other people think the same way they do when they may not.
The second observation coming from this study is that when participants were asked to describe the attributes of the people who will likely make the choice opposite of their own, they made bold and sometimes negative predictions about the personalities of those who did not share their choice.
E.g., "My vote won't matter b/c my state always votes X," and then the person doesn't vote, and of course that means their vote is... nonexistent... the state stays "X"... Assumptions are, often, self-fulfilling *prophecies*.
Load More Replies...Would like to see him do that now. GroupThink is so all persuasive now. "You MUST think the way I do or you are COMPLETELY wrong!"
That's predictable I guess. We all think we r in the right. It's not a experiment per se. But rather we don't know about things outside of ourselves so we can't be relied upon to not be biased
The irony of this one being posted on this site, to this audience, by this person.
Google "The psycology of persuasion" and you'll get heaps more. ;)
Load More Replies...Interesting collection, but giving sources would have been nice. Some of the social experiments are very anecdotal, not aligning with scientific research, particularly not if repeated or viewed in the long run.
Yea, because most of them are not experiments, but commercials for beer, cars, and other stuff...
Load More Replies...This is really interesting, but maybe the subway station wasn't the best place for the violinist? A lot of people have to catch trains, more would have probably listened if he was standing at a public plaza or something. Also, those piano stairs are cool, but they'd probably be really headache - inducing if more than a few people walk on them at once
Now you all know what use you can put "psychology" to. To manipulate people. Advertisers and marketers swear by it. lol
Can you please have the comments in a darker shade please so I can read easier.
Oops, this was meant for the Spam post full of typos. It was removed. My reply was not. o_O
Load More Replies...Google "The psycology of persuasion" and you'll get heaps more. ;)
Load More Replies...Interesting collection, but giving sources would have been nice. Some of the social experiments are very anecdotal, not aligning with scientific research, particularly not if repeated or viewed in the long run.
Yea, because most of them are not experiments, but commercials for beer, cars, and other stuff...
Load More Replies...This is really interesting, but maybe the subway station wasn't the best place for the violinist? A lot of people have to catch trains, more would have probably listened if he was standing at a public plaza or something. Also, those piano stairs are cool, but they'd probably be really headache - inducing if more than a few people walk on them at once
Now you all know what use you can put "psychology" to. To manipulate people. Advertisers and marketers swear by it. lol
Can you please have the comments in a darker shade please so I can read easier.
Oops, this was meant for the Spam post full of typos. It was removed. My reply was not. o_O
Load More Replies...
