Leaps in scientific progress are made practically every day. We’re constantly learning things about the way the world works, refining what we already know, debunking myths, and making new inventions. However, it takes some time before this new information reaches the general public. And even then, some people still won’t accept it, even if it’s been confirmed.
Trying to get to grips with this very question, user u/Ordinary_Piece_4374 asked their fellow redditors about the things that have been scientifically (dis)proven but are still denied or disliked by some people. Scroll down to see what facts the internet thinks everyone should definitely be up to date with.
Bored Panda wanted to learn more about the best way to present scientific information to the public and how to tackle people's concerns about how science 'always keeps changing,' so we reached out to Steven Wooding. He is a member of the Institute of Physics in the UK, part of the Omni Calculator project team, and the creator of the Weird Units Converter.
This post may include affiliate links.
That the earth is round. If it was flat, cats would have knocked everything off of it by now.
Fun fact, ancient cultures were able to prove the Earth was round with two sticks and the sun. In fact, no one thought Christopher Columbus would sail over the edge. They didn't want to fund his voyage because they thought he had grossly UNDER estimated the circumference.
Think they were super close too like only off by 1000km or something. Just read somewhere that they found an ancient tablet that describes Pythagoras's theorem (a^2+b^2=c^2) 2600 years prior or something like that. Ancient cultures def werent stupid like the ancient aliens guy keeps putting out
Load More Replies...The best one I heard is: If the earth was flat, Disney would’ve put a resort on the edge to bungee jump off of
Ron White once uttered a truism that cannot be denied: you can't fix stupid.
If the erath was flat, there would be no such thing as overcast sky. It would be densely cloudy with open sky at horizon, at its most.
Cats can understand an average of 50 words, and they don’t give a s**t about 49 of them
Or “treats”. But they are “A” students at learning the sound of the treat bag or food can opening. Some are even smarter, and also learn the sound of the opening of cabinet where the cat food is kept.
Load More Replies...I had been told that the training procedure with cats was difficult. It's not. Mine had me trained in two days. ~ Bill Dana.
Ha! Me too! I still try but without winning results. Sigh.
Load More Replies...I once knew a cat named Bert who was raised with 6 dogs. Bert would come when called and would sit when told to, which shows that most cats are simply just ignoring us.
My 1st cat would respond when called, think it waa just because he knew treats were coming.
Load More Replies...Yeah, my guy Benny knows several words without me even training him. Cats are way smarter than people give them credit for. Which is why they're such devious bastards... "Oh, look, I'm just an adorable little guy. meow I wouldn't hate if you filled this little ol' bowl with food... meow"
My husband and I have six cats. The coolest thing in my "pack" is they all truly know their own names. I can call one of them, and only that one looks. My smart kitts <3
Bouche and Audi know their names. They also know each other's name. If I want Bouche, I call Audi. If I want Audi, I call Bouche. The one I didn't call gets nosy and jealous, and has to come see what's going on.
Load More Replies...My cat knows the difference between "kiss" which is a light head bump, and "smooch" which is a more involved slobbery cheek rub all over the face (often preceded by a very human sounding "sigh"). Both result in treats being dished out by yours truly. The moment I give him the treats he either forgets both words or becomes temporarily deaf. Still trying to figure that one out.
My cat will also "kiss" on command. If you say it she will touch your forehead with her nose. It's adorable. The only other words that get her attention are "tuna" and "out". (She's allowed out on the balcony but can't go anywhere else from there) But the best way to greet her is "psps". :)
Load More Replies...And that's why we love them. Kings and Queens of aloofness, carry on with your reign.
Jesus wasn't a Caucasian fellow
And if you go to Asia, he's shown as Asian. If you go to Africa, he's shown as African.
Load More Replies...PANDAS! Some of us are believers in Christianity. Some of us are believers in Allah. Some of us are Wiccans. Some of us are atheists. Discuss, please. Don't be hateful and rude to each other. Calling names isn't acceptable. We are all Pandas, no matter what we do or do not believe.
This is not about jesus religion, mate. but, solely about his race. jesus always depicted as caucasian male in history. the truth is -according from some newest discovery, jesus have black hair, tan skin and brown eyes. just how middle-eastern looks in that era.
Load More Replies...The general consensus based on Roman records is that Rabbi Yeshua of Nazareth did indeed exist.
Load More Replies...This is beating a dead horse and in a way that's also wrong. 1) almost no one who actually is interested about Christianity or historical Jesus thinks these days that he was a blonde, blue-eyed Anglo-American. That ship has sailed. 2) it's silly to counter by underlining how Jesus was NOT European/Caucasian. Actually, he probably looked quite a lot like your Italian or Greek person today might look. Don't emphasize his brown eyes or dark hair, that's not so shocking really.
RIGHT!?!?! He’s literally from the Middle East he’s not gonna be white
Caucasian just means “born west of the Caucus mountains” not white. Hence, the other side, “Asian.”
Load More Replies...If he existed at all, he spoke Aramaic, and being a Jewish carpenter in in his 30s when he died, was almost married (it would've been extremely unusual to be unmarried at that age).
Jesus is well established as a rabbi when he died. He didn't have a large following because he was giving carpentry advice. But you are right that it would have been extremely unusual for him to have been unmarried. And at the Last Supper, one of the gospels mentioned that the wives and children were there serving the men, but it isn't more specific than that.
Load More Replies...According to Wooding, from the Omni Calculator team, one of the main things to consider when communicating anything—whether science-related or not—is tailoring the message to the audience receiving it.
"The primary consideration is their scientific knowledge, but also their interests and concerns. So, refrain from using jargon or technical terms they might not understand. Try to explain concepts in a way that's easy to follow—creating a story around the research is a great idea," Wooding shared with Bored Panda.
"You also want to tell them what it might mean for them and why they should care about what could be relatively dry scientific facts. Images and infographics are also good tools for communicating complex information clearly and concisely."
Yelling at your kids can have long-term effect on the child's mental health. Abuse isn't just physical, and just cuz it's not physical doesn't mean it cant scar someone for life.
Especially when, you don´t know why you are being yelled at or know you are right and till get a slap. It´s taken me 40+ years
Did you ever cop the "No backchatting" thing? I got that a lot but when I asked what it meant, I'd get hit for it because that was apparently backchatting to her.
Load More Replies...True. When I was in the wind grade, I learned that if you accidentally hurt somebody, you said, I’m sorry. One day I accidentally stepped on my mother’s foot and it really hurt her. I said, I’m sorry. She yelled, a heck of a lot of good that does me. That froze my mind in that moment and no matter what I did or how much I wanted to, could not say I’m sorry. I was almost 30 years old before I felt comfortable apologizing. Be carful dealing with kids.
Also be careful with your words. I was recently diagnosed with inattentive type adhd after years and years of academic struggles and part of why it took so long is because of how ingrained the idea that "I couldn't have focus issues because I wasn't trying in the first place" in my mind. My mother is a lovely woman and we have a good relationship, but she definitely matured with age.
So frustrating. Every report card I got I was in the top 5 in my year and almost every teacher wrote something along the lines of "could do better". Then I got screamed at for 'not trying hard enough'. My ADHD is so severe that I was diagnosed at age 2 in 1972, when it was barely acknowledged that ADHD existed, let alone in girls, yet somehow I just 'wasn't trying hard enough'.
Load More Replies...TBH, this goes for adults too. Please pass it on to all the a*****e bosses and Karens.
While I agree that verbal abuse is verbal abuse and it is wrong, when it comes from someone who is literally responsible for your every need because you have zero agency of your own, it takes on a whole new dimension.
Load More Replies...THIS THIS THIS. I'm a grown a*s adult and whenever my father contacts me out of the blue every several years I break out in anxiety sweats. Because he typically only does that to yell at me about something so we almost never talk. I'm too much like him which is why I ll never have kids.
If I had been given a choice between the physical abuse and the mental abuse, hands down, I'd have chosen physical abuse. The body eventually heals, whereas the mind slowing dissolves into neuroticism.
You are totally wrong! I'm extremely surprised you don't understand mental abuse is included in the physical. The abject fear and anxiety of waiting for the second blow never goes totally away
Load More Replies...Hated that saying sticks and stones may break your bones but words can never hurt you. I remember saying that to myself but still hurting inside
I have panic attack to this day because my dad had an anger problems and would yell and cuss loudly for no reason, and explode at every little thing.
Same here! My father was a choleric like that, too, and to this day I can't handle it when people yell.
Load More Replies...I learned the wrong way. My mother was abusive (still is emotionally) physically and emotionally. I never saw anything different so I passed it on. Please know that I have apologized to my kids multiple times. It doesn't work. Stopped a woman at Costco that took her 4 yo son into the stall to spank him....for hitting his sister
Evolution. No theory has EVER been proven more correct with so much freaking evidence but yet here we are
Well, there are a couple of people who are so stupid, I believe even Darwin would take a second guess.
Ah, but consider that evolution merely involves adaptation to environmental pressures (not necessarily improvement). Maybe stupid people have simply adapted to an environment that rewards stupidity...the current glut of flat-earthers, anti-vaxxers, conspiracy theorists, and Congress suggest that stupid people may actually be thriving!
Load More Replies...When religious leaders reject evolution, it's not about science and it's not about religion. It's about controlling the narrative.
I get so tired of the "I didn't come from no monkey" line. Shows the speaker doesn't have a clue what Evolution is.
That evolution occurs is fact. The theory is an explanation of how it works.
People habitually use the word "theory" when they mean "hypothesis". A theory is a conclusion supported by the preponderance of evidence, but leaves room for amending the initial hypothesis if/when new evidence comes to light. Gravity is also a theory, but I'll bet no one disputes it after they're crushed by a safe dropped from a 4th story window by a cartoon rabbit.
Also, "evolution" is an observation, that organisms have changed through time. "Natural selection" is Darwin's explanation for it.
Raised in a Catholic home where creationism was taught and I believe in evolution
....still believing the dumb s**t that god created everything. The biggest lie ever perpetrated by an organisation, and they're still at it. Pick whichever religion you want.
I believe science and spirituality can go hand-n-hand. I don't believe in religion, but I do believe in God (or a higher power), but I also believe in science. I don't see why both can't be true
Load More Replies...
That Andrew Wakefield falsely linked the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine to autism in young children.
He was also essentially run out of Britain, which is how he ended up in the US working with anti-vax celebrities and speaking to state legislatures as an "expert" in regards to trying to end vaccine mandates for school.
Load More Replies...And the reason why he did this smear campaign on the MMR vaccine is because he actually had patents for selling the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines separately, as opposed to in one shot. It was entirely about making money for himself.
Yep, he didn't start off as anti-vax, but instead "pro buy my vaccine instead so I can have money."
Load More Replies...Not just autism. He also linked the mmr vaccine to being the cause of Crohn's disease, he was a gastroenterologist, it put research into the causes back by quite a few years.
This BS was long before this dude. I was born mid 1970’s and my mam refused to have me vaccinated with the triple as this myth was around in the UK then. So as a child I had all of them and many more (the illnesses). Thankfully the primary school did the polio vaccine, on lumps of sugar. As a person who understands science and went through these illnesses, I am very much PRO vaccine. Edit: to add that Whooping cough is the only one I remember as a young child. It was that bad.
The rumor is what he largely based his research falsification on. A group was suing over the MMR and his alleged study occurred directly following him colluding with them. He also held a patent for a measles vaccine that couldn't compete with the MMR and the primary premise of his falsified findings was not anti-vax, but specifically anti-MMR, presumably so he could discredit the competition and profit from his measles vaccine.
Load More Replies...Just this morning I read the Washington Post article, "Scientists discover how dozens of genes may contribute to autism". Wonder if Jenny McCarthy-Wahlberg read it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2023/10/05/autism-genes-brain-development/
As the mother of an autistic son (36), this man's on the top of my personal hit list. The whole thing was a sham from day one. Please educate yourself before spreading more bull-muffins: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_MMR_autism_fraud
Meanwhile, Bored Panda wanted to get Wooding's thoughts on how researchers might tackle people who are always skeptical of any scientific developments because the facts seem to always be changing.
"One way is to explain the differences between scientific facts and theories; what might be reported as facts are actually theories," the Omni Calculator team member explained.
"A scientific fact has well-substantiated evidence and is widely accepted by the scientific community (e.g., the Earth is round). On the other hand, a scientific theory is an explanation of a phenomenon that includes facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses. A scientific theory can change as new facts are discovered and experiments are carried out," he said.
We found out that the cholesterol in egg yolk is indeed very healthy and useful yet some people still demonize it
Favorite part of the egg that I refused to give up during this anti-egg campaign. Glad I stuck to my guns on this issue.
Same! Egg yolk is one of my favourite foods. Especially when you dip buttered toast in runny yolk and hot sauce 🤤
Load More Replies...I’ve eaten two everyday since I was 13 and I’m 35 now. I never understood the cholesterol thing with eggs
The worst part of cholesterol demonization - your body needs cholesterol, and your body produces 80% of the cholesterol it needs. Your diet is only 20%. We were lied to.
it's sugar that we put in practically everything because a bunch of sugar executives convinced the government that trans fat would kill us all.
Now, for some reason, I wanna eat a fried ostrich egg........with fries........:)
Does ostrich egg taste different than chicken egg?
Load More Replies...My last doctor for one. Cholesterol in eggs is the good stuff 😁. My refusing to believe his views on cholesterol though led to him not giving me very good advice for prediabetes. So I ignored it. I'm an idiot too
It is difficult to give good advice to someone who will not listen.
Load More Replies...Cholesterol is complicated and too many articles try to oversimplify it. It's the backbone of many hormones including estrogen and testosterone. It's a structural molecule in cell membranes. It can pile up as LDL and form plaque in arteries. 80% of it is made by your liver but any cell with smooth endoplasmic reticulum makes it.
The alpha wolf theory was disproven by its author.
No, they might possibly make themselves even more-cringe-worthy than before by saying something like: "Well this world needs one, and that one is me, Ladies....". (Edit: I hate myself for letting myself type that out.)
Load More Replies...Alpha males are real though – unstable, a lot of the key features are missing, may crash at any time, incomplete visuals...
Yes, even the guy who came up with it says it’s wrong. The alphas in a wolf pack are actually the present mating pair. Once they conceive, another mating pair takes over the alpha positions. So the status of alpha gets to be occupied by everyone while mating.
I will say that it's useful for me if you describe yourself as an alpha male. I'll know who to avoid being around.
Even if that was how wolves worked, it wouldn't make sense to assume humans worked the same way. It's pretty dumb. Turns out the boss wolves are just the parents of the other wolves in the pack. Still useful to have those a$$holes describing themselves as alpha males because it lets sane people know who to avoid/who to maybe tip off the police about.
Dominance theory in dog training.
Your dog is not trying to take over the world. They know that you're in charge because you control what they eat, when they eat, where they eat, when they get to toilet, when they go out, where they go, and every other facet of their lives. You do not need to pin them to the ground or use collars that cause pain. You just need to reward the behaviour you want to see more of. Trainers who use aversive methods just don't have the skills to actually train dogs properly.
Don't tell me that your malinois or amstaff need you to be tougher because alligators and crocodiles can be trained to sit for blood draws without force or coercion. Your dog is not harder to train than one of the closest things we have to dinosaurs.
Same goes for parents and their kids—-mental and physical impairments aside, which can also be applied to dogs.
Load More Replies...Alligators and crocodiles are not the closest things we have to dinosaurs. We have actual real life dinosaurs. They are called birds. https://www.birdlife.org/news/2021/12/21/its-official-birds-are-literally-dinosaurs-heres-how-we-know/
Thanks for pointing this out so I didn't need to 😂
Load More Replies...This a half truth, it's not about dominance in the sense of imposing. My dog is a rescue dog. She was very apprehensive around other dogs and often attacked other dogs. The trick was not to let her lead. If we are walking and cross another dog I make sure she is on my side, and I am in between her and the other dog. I showing her that I have control and the initiative. If the other dog is calm then I keep a distance, ~2 meters and engage in conversation. Then her noise starts to work and she calms down, it took a while but eventually she was confident enough to meet other dogs. Is that dominating? call it what you want but if the dog senses that you are not in control in can become nervous. Imagen your on a bus and the driver is talking with a passenger turning there head and not keeping his mind on the job.... don't know you guy but I would want to drive the bus. When I see people taking the dog for walk and they are on the phone not aware of the surroundings it really bugs me.
"Is that dominating?" To answer your question: NO. It is leadership. Are you yanking your dog to your side with a choke chain? A prong or e-collar? No? Then, again, no. Not dominance but leadership. So, it sounds like you are doing the right thing but don't confuse with 'dominating' your dog!
Load More Replies...Operant conditioning....reward the good, ignore the bad. Easy peasey.
There was a Swedish woman named Bodil who'd go on tour in Sweden with 'Bodil's Mini Circus'. She'd have piglets, hens, dogs, a cat performing with one of the dogs etc. When asked how she managed to make the animals do what she wanted, she replied 'I reward wanted behaviour and ignore unwanted' because animals will think getting your attention is a reward in itself.
Load More Replies...Although I do agree with the majority of this post, I must state that I fully believe that one of my dogs is trying to take over the world. He sit atop of his throne in his 8 lb glory looking cute and barking orders and somehow everybody gives him what he wants!
totally agree. Both of my dogs were very well behaved. I never hit them or yelled at them. They obeyed me because of how kind and loving I was to them. And I was consistent. That's also a huge key!
My pup is a rescue and was abused. We don't do any punishment training, he's had too traumatic of a life until we got him. Positive rewards based training and time, and now I have a fairly well behaved boy
Load More Replies...I don't control anything about my dog's eating habits. All she does is give me "the look"- if you know you know- and I come running to feed her.
My neighbor hates my dogs and you should keep your dog on a leash just incase but don't hurt them with it
"A good example is gravity. First, we had Newton's theory of gravity, which tried to incorporate the observations scientists could carry out at the time. As experiments improved, inaccuracies became apparent, which were then resolved by Einstein's theory of gravity, general relativity," Wooding told us.
"We can still use Newton's approach most of the time, but we use Einstein's where extreme accuracy is required."
Refusing to accept new information doesn’t just have to do with an individual’s stubbornness or narrowmindedness. Broadly speaking, people tend to cling to information that supports whatever worldview they have at the moment. Having to monumentally shift your understanding of how life and society function on Planet Earth is a huge task. As The New Yorker put it, impressions are very perseverent once they're formed.
Science is evolving, what's proven one day can be shown to be a mistake the next.
That's disliked by many people, because the brain structure that makes religion useful is also used by people who want science to go only one (their) way usually.
That's a feature, not a bug like some people seem to think.
Load More Replies...2000 years ago we thought tides, lunar cycles, plagues, disease, lightning, the sun, were all acts of god and that one day he will return to save us all. 2000 years later, we have now shown all of these acts of god are actually acts of provable science but, we still seem to be waiting for god to show up.
The fact that science changes with new information is a strength, not a weakness.
Science is great because if one scientist claims something, they have to provide evidence and other scientists will check that evidence and call out their mistakes if found. Even long held scientific beliefs can be changed upon finding new evidence. It's great.
Too many people do not understand that. Which is why we get the idiots that cry "you used to call it "global warming" but now it's climate change. DUURRRR". Obviously as we learn more we update our thinking. That doesn't mean current science is untrustworthy. Just that we understand the signs of global warning first but have come to understand that it's one aspect of climate change, as a whole.
The carbon footprint was invented by BP. You know, they guys that inundated the Gulf of Mexico with crude oil a couple times. It's among the first and best disinformation campaigns to this day. It pushed the responsibility of carbon emissions cleanly from corporations to the people.
First thing that came to mind after reading "BP" was that Bored Panda invented carbon footprint...
Same, I've been on this website long enough for my brain to automatically translate BP into Bored Panda lol.
Load More Replies...It's EVERYONE's responsibility. This kind of factoid just gives people an excuse not to do 5Hlt.
I would love to see where they got this info from. On one hand, yes they came up with the term carbon footprint. But also everyone who has a car is responsible for carbon emissions and who every has anything that uses oil is also responsible.
The Carbon Footprint is a weapon. People attempt to coerce others into reducing consumption they may well need for quality of life, just because fossil fuels are the only way to attain and distribute them for a well society.
Corporations (including Big Oil) exist only because there's a demand for their products and services. Demand = Consumers. Switch gears for a second: The demand for EVs is skyrocketing and the most critical component of EVs is batteries, which are natural resource-intensive to produce. Does the responsibility for the resource-destructive mining of those elements lie with battery-makers or people who buy them?
Ok so I've heard this one before but just to clarify, cobalt (to which I guess you're referring) has been mined intensively for decades for use in the production of petrol and diesel but no-one cared about the child labour used to mine it or the ecological impact until now. Also, battery technology is developing fast and the use of cobalt will not be necessary for much longer. Be careful people, the oil cartels don't want you buying an electric car and are putting a lot of misinformation and propaganda out there.
Load More Replies...Big Oil’s carbon footprint makes Godzilla’s footprint look like a baby lizard’s.
That homosexuality is not a disease and you born with it
The anecdotal and experiential evidence points to a strong genetic link. And yet, for many different people and cultures worldwide, sexual orientation is a spectrum rather an either/or over their lifetimes. Is there a genetic predisposition to Bi-Pan-A sexualities as well?
Same as being trans! It's not a choice. Let people live THEIR lives!
I saw a local new story posted on f/b yesterday. One man proposing to another man at Disneyland. Some small minded woman went on and on how that is disgusting and icky...I'm guessing she was "christian"... for the record, I used to consider myself christian until these ungodly people laid claim to the name. I don't want to be associated with hateful people..
Nor is it a mental issue. So happy the DSM dropped that whole line. Who you’re attracted to is just who you’re attracted to—-NOT who society, and its wholly unnatural constructs, thinks you should be attracted to. It’s also nobody else’s business, ffs.
Homosexuality can be found amongst various branches of animals that goes back hundreds of thousands of years. Again, religion doesn't belong in the mainstream or in politics.
Thing is, I don't give a rat's a*s whether it's genetic or even a choice. Who cares? Saying it's genetic instead of a choice gives cover for religious bigots who realize that that homophobia is no longer acceptable. But the reason for it is irrelevant. Homosexuality harms no one, certainly not the people involved. We shouldn't stigmatize LGBTQ no matter what their reason for feeling like they do.
I can't believe that homosexuality is an still and "issue" in this day and age. Just accept there have always been human beings of differing sexual preferences other than hetero.
I have a (maybe stupid) idea about homosexuals. A very short time ago as evolution runs, there was a very great risk of the mother dying in childbirth or the father being killed by a sabertooth tiger or mastodon. Homosexuals may be natures way of making sure, there are som people who get no children of their own, and so are ready to care for those children.
Same goes for pedophilia unless it was caused by trauma, in which case it isnt really pedophilia anyway; it is a trauma response that isn't hard-wired. Pedophilia is a sexual orientation, and one that must be terrible to be afflicted with. It is also not wrong to have the thoughts and feelings - only wrong to act on them. Its a pity society doesnt do more to help non-offending pedophiles.
However, that’s why striving to be open-minded is such an important thing. No matter how much we think we know, there’s always something new to learn as technology advances and new research is conducted.
One study, published in 2023, found that attempts to debunk science-relevant misinformation were, on average, not successful. However, there is a silver lining. When misinformation has to do with negative topics other than health, and the corrections to the information are detailed, then people are more likely to change their beliefs.
What also helps make these corrections is when the misinformed have familiarized themselves with both sides of the issue and when the topic in question isn’t politically polarized.
Electric cars are not as green as Elon says. They still create pollution from mining & creating the electricity to charge unless from green sources
electric cars aren't green at all. The electricity used to run e vehicles is usually produced by oil powered generators.
I thought the point was they are greener than gas powered cars - not green. Even with the full carbon footprint to manufacture AND using electricity from day gas fired power station, it’s still going to be greener then equivalent new car purchase of gas powered car after maybe 3 years use and a LOT greener with more years. If some of the electricity is from green sources - then just gets better.
The electric grid sometimes fails now when we have very hot or cold weather. What's going to happen when everyone gets home from work and plugs in their car to recharge?
California already has had to stop night time charging on occasion, because the grid can't handle the load.
Load More Replies...Electric cars pollute less than fuel powered ones. Even IF the electricity is dirty, its more easily dealt with at one big source than a million little ones.
It's far, far greener to build walkable cities, and have excellent public transport. It is also cheaper.
Of course it is. But if you need to go somewhere inaccessible by train, rent an electric car.
Load More Replies...I thought The point was they are greener than gas cars - not perfectly green. Even with manufacturing carbon footprint AND charging with electricity from gas fired power stations - once you are over 3 + years of ownership you are greener than gas- and a LOT greener after 4+ ( new car to new car purchase comparison)
OK, so I give up the old chugger, for something new clean and electri.... oh, for crying out loud! Can't have that either! How about I just sit in my own s**t forever? That enough for your majesties??? LOL!!!
If there were less people on the planet, we could all drive what we wanted and the climate would be fine. “All our environmental problems become easier to solve with fewer people, and harder – and ultimately impossible – to solve with ever more people.” Sir David Attenborough
That your diet can indeed affect your hormones and mood.
It works both ways, too. Some foods are sought out because they make you feel good. ( chocolate improves mood). Then there are foods that make you feel bad, mostly overly processed foods.
My ex wouldn't eat all day. He'd come home in a foul mood, play with his supper, drink heavily, then eat like a glutton to the point of aspirating after I'd gone to bed. Yeah, he was delightful.
I don’t remember eating depression with a side order of anxiety!!
Load More Replies...Ohh yeah, Cheesecake can uplift like alcohol, but it doesn't make you drunk.
MSG is a delicious and perfectly healthy addition to a number of dishes
The people that make me laugh are those that say they can't eat any Chinese food because of this but are perfectly fine making chicken stock from chicken bouillon. Guess what makes bouillon so tasty?
Yeah so many ignorant people out there with food. Then there’s food with naturally occurring MSG (cheese and soy extracts etc and more )
Load More Replies...It's funny how there are always people who argue against this with comments like "too much is bad for you" as if too much of anything, even literally water, is bad for you. If you get headaches, that doesn't mean MSG is bad for you. It may mean you have an allergy or sensitivity to it and not that it's unhealthy. Why people need to apply personal experiences for general statements will always be moronic to me. You having an allergy to something does not mean it's not perfectly healthy. Obviously nobody is talking about your specific issue with an item and doesn't make that item not 'perfectly healthy' as a general statement.
In fact, sometimes when I get the flu, I'll start craving MSG. Then I'll eat something with MSG in it and start feeling better, faster. Does this happen to anyone else?
MSG is not evil and makes everything delicious, it's just us who are allergic to it the ones that suffer. But just because I'm allergic, there's no reason for me to demonize it, on the contrary, I envy those that can eat and enjoy it. :(
Then please explain the hives and trouble breathing I get when I am unknowingly exposed to it.
As ‘Discover’ magazine points out, facts alone aren’t always enough to correct misinformation. Nor are they enough to change people’s minds. People’s understanding of the world is closely related to their sense of personal identity. Meanwhile, human beings as a whole aren’t the most rational even at the best of times.
Our biology, as remarkable as it is, isn’t all that helpful when it comes to changing people’s minds, too. Psychology professor Lisa Fazio, from Vanderbilt University, notes that our minds tend to create new memories alongside ones that already exist, instead of ‘overwriting’ information that’s not correct. So when you try to recall information that you’ve recently learned has changed, you might come up with ideas that are a collage of these competing facts.
On top of that, repetition tends to encode information into our minds, even if those facts are false. The more often we hear something, the more likely it is to get stuck in our minds. This phenomenon is known as the illusory truth effect.
Sugar is way worse than fat
Be careful what you wish for. Diabetic fingers can go cold and dead long before the rest of your body craps out.
Load More Replies...Nope everything is always about AMOUNT. You need sugar and fat to f*****g live.
Also types of each matter. Just like with cholesterol. And, obviously, moderation.
Load More Replies...Look... I am a dessert girl. I LOVE SWEETS!! But cutting down on them has been a game changer. It was and still is hard but so worth it
Agree but kind of the opposite. I not really a sweets person but when I crave it I REALLY crave it.
Load More Replies...But who puts fat in their tea to sweeten it and bring out the flavour???
Lotsa people pouring fat into their coffee every day without giving it a second thought though.
Load More Replies...Sugar, in of itself, is not evil. Just as fat, in of itself, is not evil. Over consumption of sugar and/or fat (or anything) is bad. Drinking too much water can kill you as surely as not drinking enough, though it is alot harder to drink too much water. Just as it's easy to over consume sugar and hard to under consume it. Moderation is the key.
"As a 2014 review in the journal Diabetes Care put it: “The belief that sucrose is metabolized differently than HFCS is a myth. No study has shown any difference between the two when each is given [in the same caloric values], nor is there any difference in sweetness or caloric value.”
Load More Replies...In the U.S. a vast majority of all processed food contain sugar, and usually in huge amounts.
Combination of sugar and fat is the worst. Actually, the combination of any carb and fat is the worst.
That our current rapidly changing climate is caused by human activity and mainly from a few corporations.
You still get people who deny it
Then you get people who accept it but refuse to go after the main causes.
I’m not down voting, but you’re not entirely right. Greed is the root cause. Study the old Soviet bloc’s environmental record.
Load More Replies...This is the second post that blames corporations for climate change. Here is an easy exercise to consider: if the largest oil company and the largest beef processor shut down tomorrow would we use less oil and eat less beef? Answer: 100% no. We would just buy it from a different company. Stop blaming corporations for peoples' behaviour. The truth is that the only way you can stop people from eating beef twice a day and driving a massive tank size SUV to drop their kids off at school is by government regulating their behaviour. As long as there is demand, someone will provide the supply
I call our civilization Petrelaic Civilization. We cannot live without petroleum. A Partial list of the over 6,000 products made from one barrel of oil (after creating 19 gallons of gasoline) https://wvstatemuseumed.wv.gov/Assets/A%20Partial%20List%20of%20Products%20Made%20from%20Petroleum.pdf
Which is even more of a reason not to waste a finite resource by burning it.
Load More Replies...the huge causes are our way of life and consumer behaviour. the few coorporations provide services or stuff everyone is using. so not so easy to blame just a few companies because they just deliver what people want.
Pushing responsibilitys over to the consumer is no solution either. Companys have huge marketing budgets, to "educate" people in what they need. Consumer behavior is made that way. Companys only producing stuff people want and need, is a myth. Same as having the choice which cooperations you buy from. Dont geht me wrong, consuming less is a way to infuence, but consuming different products wont change anything.
Load More Replies...Climate change happens regardless of humans. There have been many many ice ages already. We r just helping to push it along faster than nature intended
Exactly! How does a "climate change" person explain our finding lost civilization (homes, tools, bones etc) under the melting ice? The ice obviously came after those things were already there? Meaning that climate has been changing from warm to cold and back over time. The earth's temperature has only risen about 2 degrees since 1880. Not per year, over the past 143 years. This natural change in climate will cause some extreme weather but look at the history, as far back as we can prove, has had extreme weather.
Load More Replies...Actually, the cause is humanity's desire for comfort and convenience. Capitalists are only giving people what they want: cars, air conditioning, heated homes in winter, wide variety of out-of-season foods, international travel, convenience foods, etc.
Actually capitalism CREATES "needs" through advertising.
Load More Replies...
earth is a tiny insignificant sphere in space
“And crawling on the planet's face, some insects called the human race. Lost in time, and lost in space. And meaning.” ― Richard O'Brien, The Rocky Horror Show
I have a picture from voyager 1 near my bedrom door. A small arrow points at the single pixel that encompasses both Earth and the Moon with the caption "You are Here". It helps keep me modest, since I am not even an atom of that pixel in the scope of things. It reminds me that my biggest problems are so small that the Universe won't even notice them, and that I, too, am beneath notice. Thus I remember my place in things.
We are tiny, but not insignificant. What other planet have we found with life?
“There's an infinite universe of false things and a more narrow universe of true things, so most of the stuff that we hear multiple times is true,” Fazio told ‘Discover’ magazine. However, this can be particularly troublesome if someone is deliberately trying to spread false information.
Meanwhile, new and correct facts have to be presented in a way that’s approachable and palatable. If important discoveries are only ever publicized in ways that only other researchers would understand their significance, the general population might not understand why the new info matters so much.
On the flip side, it’s also essential not to dumb the information down too much or to over-exaggerate its significance. Otherwise, you might make people less willing to trust articles about scientific discoveries.
LGBTQIA+ people. Other animals engage in same gender behaviour and some can change theirs. There's a whole female only lizard species that can reproduce. Homophobia etc is the unnatural thing, not being gay, bi or trans etc.
Sex IS NOT THE SAME HAS Gender... One is biological (no, you are male or female, and no op will change this fact - males are bioloigically different from females) and the other a social context (you can CALL yourself whatever you want - man, woman, butterfly, a TV screen, whatever, but you're still either male or female)... Sorry to spoil your party.
The fact that you think this spoils anyone's party shows you're only listening to fearmongering. Trans people know biology. They know chromosomes aren't changeable. They also know gender has a social context - that's why most binary people choose to follow one or the other in specific ways. But I'd still have to ask you what makes a body physically male or female that an operation can't change...
Load More Replies...I recently read 1500 animal species have been proven to participate in homosexuality
And homophobia is only in one of them. Which one is "unnatural", then?
Load More Replies...Female lizards can only reproduce without males, because in reptiles and birds, the females have two different chromosomes. So a single female has all the chromosomes it needs to make both male and female offspring.
Sorry, nuance isn't acceptable round these parts. Unless you toe the party line expect to be attacked as a transphobe.
Load More Replies...People say its not natural. -Points out how common it is in nature. Well people aren't animals! -yes they are
Shout out to anyone else to has had a lgbt+ pet. I had a gay cockatiel as a teenager (his name was lil burd), I tried to get him a female for breeding and companionship, he hated her. but he also already had this thing going with my upstairs roommates budgie (his name was testicle 😂). And when te$tickle left, he met another male budgie and stayed with him lovingly until he passed. I gave the female to my uncle as she just wasn’t welcome in the boys club at all and she deserved to be happy too.
People being what people are - and let them be as long as they are not a risk to others. Just have equal rights, obligations and protections for all, and stop any special rights serving only a few. Also stop imposing your way on others or demanding special rights - a little more "mind your own business" and "let others be just like i want to be left alone" may be in place, and acceptance and tolerance would be much more widespread.
Going out in the cold doesn't give you a cold. Cracking your knuckles does not cause arthritis.
but going out in the cold can lower your immune system making you more likely to get sick.
Sickest I've ever been was working midnights. Bad sleep schedule does it too.
Load More Replies...Being cold requires more energy to keep warm, which in turn means less energy available for your immune system. That makes you more vulnerable to disease. So while it may not directly cause it, there is a correlation.
Nope. Cold does reduce our immune system. https://www.uclahealth.org/news/new-study-links-nose-temperature-and-immune-response
I used to stand in puddles to make myself sick so I could stay home from school :)
Or having wet hair when it's cold outside! My mom always said that one.
If it did, people who live in cold climates and spend time outdoors would be sick all the time. And by that logic, people who live in equatorial areas should never get a cold. I live on the Gulf Coast, and people still get colds, even though the temperatures are very mild in the winter.
Viruses are more prevalent in the winter simply because we spend more time indoors sealed up together.
Just going out of your home and into the world brings you in contact with a whole host of health-related issues. Including coming into contact with someone who has a cold, and sneezes, coughs, and touches stuff around you.
i remember getting a cold once in the summer and my biology teacher said 'oh come on, you cant have the cold, it's summer' and i pointed out to him that it was caused by germs not temperature. he looked mad XD
Myers Briggs Test (INTJ, IFNJ) is flawed and not reliable as any decent personality assessment.
Myers Briggs is horoscopes for those who think they are too smart for horoscopes. That said, I always get the same result when I take a Myers Briggs :D
It isn't exactly good at completely classifying people, but it does have some accuracy to it, especially when the same ones apply to you far more than the others and isn't just random values like a horoscope. I guess that it can predict the general behavior of people, but not totally define them. Also it comes with the added benefit of helping me socialize with people and understand them with loose guidelines so I guess I'm personally a bit defensive of it :'(
Load More Replies...It can still be fun to take the test tho. At my old job, we all did the tests at a Christmas party and shared the results. It was a pretty good time.
Exactly, mine was INTP, but there was another INTP in the room so we got into an argument. (Because for some reason he just refused to believe that I had the same type as him.)
Load More Replies...Define "reliable?" Is it repeatable (Would different researchers get the same result)? Yes. Is it accurate? I'd argue that what it measures is difficult to quantify. Is the MEANINGFUL? That's the question. Does scoring high on "introvert" vs "extrovert" mean anything other than how Myers Briggs tests for introvert or extrovert. Has any correlation between specific traits been identified? Are the tests predictive of anything they don't literally simply ask the test-taker to describe themselves as? Not that I know of. They are simply carefully considered ways of labelling how people tend to relate to others. Would people as willingly accept being labelled "bubbly" vs "melancholic"? "Precise" vs "imaginative"? "Inductive" vs "Deductive?"
All Myers Briggs proves is that we're all different and we all approach life, work and all its problems in a different way.
As far as I know the Meyer's Briggs Personality Indicator was not intended to be taken so literally that people based their whole future on it. It's just was it says, an indicator.
It has a poor reputation based on places that use the results to determine somebody's future. Yes, the most important part of the name MBTI is I = Indicator.
Load More Replies...Just looked at these and I can be all of them, depending on mood, time of day, weather pressure and moon phase. Load of dogs danglies
Yes, I’ve long known these types of tests do not define who I am. In addition to your stated influences, they are easily manipulated for the desired outcome. Ex. What is your color?
Load More Replies...When I facilitate MBTI session i emphasise that it is ONLY AN INDICATOR but one of the best ways to understand the self and demonstrate differences between people and personalities across a spectrum that may be based on individual traits and situations. Anyone using it for hiring & firing decisions or pidgeon-holeing people deserves to be beaten within an inch of their life with the MBTI manual.
I have taken mine several times, having different moods or feelings at times. Every time I get the same result.
Large vehicles increase pedestrian fatalities. Any criticism of the prevalence of huge trucks and SUV's in my city these days brings the truck bros out of the woodwork like "why do you care what I do?! It doesn't affect you!!" Yes it does, and it might kill somebody.
Don’t get between a man baby and his beloved giant twuck. Vroom vroom.
They are his Emotional Support Vehicle and must not be touched.
Load More Replies...I'm 65++ lady and have both, an extremely fast sports car and a larger bright red truck. The d**k heads think they should ride my a*s while I'm driving my little car are the same ones that give me the wide berth while I drive my truck. Guess which one I feel safer in. And yes, I use to race, it's was inherited trait.
I have the impression that lot of soccer moms prefer SUVs because they feel safer due to size and can see far ahead, due to height difference.
Oh they are definitely safer for the people on the inside because they pretty much crush everything else.
Load More Replies...When the SUVs sit higher off the road than a bus, and are just as wide, then things have gone too far with that. I hope they never hot the UK. (Well, they'd not fit down most roads.)
This seems like one of those 'correlation does not imply causation' things. All else being equal, if you increase the ratio of larger vehicle vs smaller vehicles you'll get an increase in the number of accidents involving larger vehicles. (The ratio of truck/SUV sales vs. sedans has been rising for years.) But that doesn't mean larger vehicles are more dangerous, it just means there are more of them on the road than before, relatively speaking. Additionally, if larger vehicles are involved in more pedestrian fatalities, that doesn't necessarily mean they're less safe, either. There are dozens of important variables that would need to be analyzed and plugged into the equation before coming to a conclusion like that.
One of those variables being the mentality of the person behind the wheel. I tend to see "big truck" drivers with "I own the road" mentality (and therefore trying to go faster than everyone else in crowded and dangerous traffic areas) much more than smaller cars. But to your point I would love to see the ratios of cars and truck vs human bodies accidents. The ones around my state tend to be larger vehicles and the hit-and-runs always seem to be larger vehicles.
Load More Replies...also the lack of any real driver training (at least in the u.s.) is ridiculous. for example, a 15-year-old with a learner's permit and zero behind-the-wheel training can LEGALLY operate a 60 ft RV in traffic on public roads. how's that for terrifying?
They can also buy a gun. Not sure which of these facts terrifies me more.
Load More Replies...Fun fact: the same kind of car is smaller in the EU than in the US, because of regulations for pedestrian safety
That exercise actually helps you overcome a lot of s**t including mental health issues.
I envy the poeple who can bike, swim, walk, run their minds clean. I personally find exercising so mindnumbingly boring that instead, my mind starts treadmilling each and every problem of the past day, week or even something that happened 20 years ago.
The best exercise is the exercise you DO. If cycling, walking, and running doesn't meet your needs, choose a different form of exercise that does. You might find it best to exercise with another person, eg playing badminton, tennis, golf, handball...
Load More Replies...I'm sure it can. I'm also sure it can be a knock-on effect - if you exercise, you get fitter; if you get fitter, you look better; if you look better, you have an easier time in society. Personally, I've done no exercise and felt like c**p. I'm currently doing exercise at least 4 times a week (have been for three months now)... and I still feel like c**p. So please, don't tell people who are struggling mentally that they 'just need some exercise', that isn't how it works.
Indeed. Knowing that exercise can help, doesn't actually help when the depression prevents you from DOING anything. And if depression is bad enough... I don't recommend walking next to traffic. Speaking from experience... walking next to fast moving vehicles and intense depression are not a good combination.
Load More Replies...Yeah, when I was really depressed, I'd go out and walk around the neighborhood and come back feeling fine. Then I'd go inside and all my problems would hit me again and make me feel worse than ever.
this is also not to say it beats all mental illness. some people still need medication to combat serious chemical imbalances. so if exercise alone doesn’t make you feel better, try to go see a doctor. but definitely go outside and get exercise if you’re feeling depressed. it can help.
Being in nature also does this. Now, try exercising in nature and you have a double whammy.
IDK, I do it and it makes me feel better about myself, which is helpful.
Kudos tho those who feel better and indeed it is healthy to move in more ways than one but.... for the life of me, I can't think of something more excruciating than exercising. How boring, I rather go for a blood test!
Autism is hereditary
It CAN BE hereditary. It is not hereditary in ever instance. There are more than one ‘causes’ or catalysts to autism.
There was a schizophrenia study done on monozygotic twins, where one was normal but the other was schizophrenic. Turns out, they BOTH carried the gene for schizophrenia, but something that happened in the womb (twins don’t occupy the exact same place, and the environment for one may not be as good as it is for the other) epigenetically triggered it in one twin, but not the other. Look into epigenetics. To me, it solves the Nature-Nurture debate.
Load More Replies...Not 100% of the time, but at least we know it's not from childhood vaccinations. Well, the more intelligent amongst us know that.
Both my biological parents have certain character traits which are recognised in people with Autism. I have both Autism and ADHD, and my daughter also has both. I don't care about where it came from, or how it started; I care about how she's able to cope. I was raised by neurotypical people and grew up emotionally neglected and that factored majorly in my life and I'm hoping she has better skills than I did.
I've never been diagnosed (or my ex) but there's enough similarity between my children and us that I feel safe in saying that's true in our case.
That you definitely can get without genetics. My sisinlaw contracted meningitis as a kid that left her with epilepsy from the high fever scarring. My sister woke up at 16 with a grand mal seizure. Turns out a portion of her brain, the size of an orange, was just missing...underdeveloped... causing epilepsy.
Load More Replies...
GMO food is indistinguishable to your body from non-GMO food
But many GMO foods are designed to be more resistant to herbicides, which means more herbicides are used in farming GMO crops. Our bodies may not be able to distinguish the GMO food from non-GMO food, but can it detect the extra herbicides? And how well do other animals (such as 'good' insects like bees and ladybirds) deal with these herbicides?
Herbicides are meant to kill weeds-why would an herbicide-resistant crop require more herbicide when it isn't the target? It just means that the bare minimum amount can be used to control weeds, yielding a better harvest with fewer resources used overall.
Load More Replies...We have been GMO food since our species started farming. Plants etc have been “bred” by selective choice etc.
We created GMO food since the tme we discovered farming - selective planting of crops with favourable traits or crossing them is nothing else than gen modification with a random factor to it
Exactly. Carrots are modified to be orange, apple trees are modified to grow shorter for easier harvesting and to produce sweeter fruit, etc
Load More Replies...ALL DOMESTICATED ANIMALS have been GMO'd by humans. This is called selective breeding. Whilst it does not involve artificially replacing genes in a lab setting, it is still mucking with the natural process by man.
GMO and selective breeding are two different things
Load More Replies...Not even remotely true. I used to work at a grain elevator. Some GMO grain is fed directly, as is to animals. Some grain is distilled for ethanol production and the resulting mash after use is then fed to animals. In the US corn and soy beans are usually GMO. Non GMO corn and soy beans are paid a premium to the farmer
Load More Replies...Most people have no idea what GMO means. They just heard something about it being "bad", like MSG, which is not true.
So says you, but when I eat GMO corn that is designed to cause the intestines of bugs to explode, I end up with diarrhea, so... I don't believe you.
That may be so, but the extra genetic material affects the genetic material that is naturally present, causing a potential for changes that might not act in the human body as they have prior to the changes. Moreover, if GMO food contains genetic material from animals or fish or even humans, then you cannot say that the food is the same as non-GMO food! Bacterial contributions are also suspect. Why? Because in GMO technique, you cannot select a single gene to move to a new plant or animal. There are other genes that come along for the ride and god only knows what they might do if placed into a food crop that we use for food. GMO is not the same as growing plants and affecting genetic change through pollen control as was done in the past.
Mental health issues.
Said to me by a psychiatrist doing an intake interview after I had attempted suicide (again): "But you have so much to live for." Yeah, I know and that just makes me feel worse.
Many mental health issues would dissipate if adults didn't hold onto the myth that kids are resilient and they'll bounce right back.
In America if you think it's a mess trying to obtain proper health care wait until you try to obtain proper mental health care. Words fail me. No one should have to live in a system as messed up as this.
Yes. Don't get me started. Some people think mental health issues are a joke.
Have had 2 outstanding concussions due to auto accidents. Trust me, it changes you.
it is stupid that people think this. mental health problems are real. i am not mentally healthy in any way. i have imposter syndrome, so it took me a full year to figure out i was trans, and when i did, i had a mental breakdown in the middle of a dance class. i also think i might have depression, but i can't tell because of the previously mentioned imposter syndrome.
But insurance won't cover much and the only thing that is covered is part of the short visit to the doctor to get more medication, and the medication. Psychotherapy, counseling, and talk therapy of almost any kind and for almost any variety of mental health problem is not encouraged and NOT COVERED by insurance companies. Medication is a money-maker; talk therapy is for discovering the source of the problem and trying to fix it.
Dealing with this for almost 70 years. With very few exceptions it is not something that can be cured, just controlled.
Climate change, unfortunately.
“All our environmental problems become easier to solve with fewer people, and harder – and ultimately impossible – to solve with ever more people.” Sir David Attenborough
Hallelujah Sir David ! World over population is THE ROOT CAUSE of all problems, yet no one is willing to discuss it because it's too difficult.
We are either going to learn a whole bunch of things from this or render ourselves extinct. That's on us. The Earth can get along fine without us, it doesn't care.
Well, climate change exists, and without it, none of us, not even plants, would be here. It is a requirement for biodiversity. The common day issue is not so much climate change in itself, we can adapt, and we will, as it will change, with or without us. The question is - what, and how much are we contributing, and is that all out good or bad? Right now, the cold hard fact is that this is answers and knowledge that we simply don't have, and are only guessing at.
Acknowledge it and change our way of living.
Load More Replies...So let me get this straight. The climate scientists who have been studying this in minute detail for decades, study built upon study... are wrong because you made plants in an aquarium grow faster with CO2?
Load More Replies...Weed is addictive and you can get withdrawals from it Literally just had an argument with a friend over this
That’s because people assume that all addictions are physical, ignoring potential and very real psychological addictions. But that doesn’t change the fact that “weed” has spectacular medicinal advantages, but as with everything needs to be used responsibly and with respect.
Weed is not chemically addicting but can be addicting in other ways. Then again, humans can become addicted to anything.
If it messes with your brain chemistry, it can cause addiction. Doesn't have to be a drug or alcohol, it can be a certain TV show or a daily routine. If something makes us feel better, unchecked, it will become addictive.
Marijuana is addictive. A study performed in Sweden over some 10 years, found that with about 1 in 20 people, an actual full on addiction could happen with repeated use, and would lead to withdrawal symptoms if use was ended.
I stopped for a year and a half, then started again after a surgery. No withdrawals, no shakes, no cravings.
The problem with weed is that you don't really know what you are taking. I know quite a few people that have had trouble giving up weed. Personally it makes me foggy for days after so I generally don't. I guess it varies from one person to another. I quit smoking nearly 3 packs a day overnight. Doesn't mean tobacco is not addictive. and before I get downvoted I'm not saying alcohol is better or prescription drugs are better.
If you buy your cannabis from a dispensary, you know exactly what you're taking
Load More Replies...And medicinal marijuana has all the addictive attributes removed. So yes, the “addiction” aspect of medical pot could only be psychological, stemming from the feeling patients get when it does a wonderful job of easing their chronic pain. Goodbye HIGHLY addictive opioids, hello non-addictive medical marijuana!
Weed CAN be addictive, just like EVERYTHING. I personally smoke every single day, often multiple times a day, and have for 25+ years, but on the rare occasions that I don't, usually do to travel, there are absolutely zero withdraw symptoms. Don't get me wrong, I still get what some might call "cravings", but it's not a physical or mental need, I simply hate our species and find dealing with all of you and the insanity is a lot more pleasant when I'm stoned.
The Portuguese Man-O-War, despite being called a jellyfish by many aquariums and people, is actually a siphonophore. I'm guessing this mix up comes from the Man-O-War's jellyfish-like appearance and the fact that siphonophores and jellyfish are both Hydrozoans, and the fact that siphonophores as a whole are usually lumped in with jellyfish.
Yeah, but "jellyfish" is easier to say. Siphonophore sounds like I'm insulting your mother.
Siphonophore sounds like a communication system to me
Load More Replies...The title is "29 solid facts that some people flat-out refuse to accept". Maybe I'm wrong on this, but I feel like this would fall under "neat little facts you probably didn't know" but maybe I just have yet to run into one of these jelly fish deniers?
I will start a jelly-fish-deniers club so that we can fight over this topic. ... ... wait... no, I won't :D
Load More Replies...Alright let's try to clear up something else we're dying to know about: If you could milk a jellyfish, what would it's jelly taste like?
The term that bugs me is killer whale, which is even used by scientists instead of referring to them as Orcas. They are not whales - they are dolphins. Near-sighted, uneducated, ancient sailors gave them the moniker, the same clowns who thought manatees were mermaids.
It is very natural to lump them together as you don't want to meet any of them.
Just because your uncle touched you when you were a kid doesn't mean you get to say whether my uncle Gertrude is my uncle or not.
Load More Replies...Agree with 1 to 7, 10, 11, 8 to 9 seems likely. I disagree with 12 because the religion you follow is not hereditary. Etc. Oh dear, I forgot that the numbers change, so cancel that.
Wow, so no one mentioned the 2020 US Presidential election., or did it just get censored? Anyway, was the election stolen from Trump? No. Anyone who believes that is an idiot. Did the Democrats commit widespread voter fraud? Yup. They would have won without it anyway, but they were really just testing the waters for 2024.
That fact that calories in, calories out governs your weight is particularly disliked by Pandas.
There is much more to it. Hormones like insulin, the storage hormon is important. If you eat in a way , that avoids big bloodglucose spikes , you can litterally eat more calories and keep weight. The biochemist Jessie inshaup, or “glucosegoddess” in instagram, or many podcasts, talks about this in layman-terms, and has all the science to explain why. Check it and learn something, that blew my mind, honestly.
Load More Replies...Just because your uncle touched you when you were a kid doesn't mean you get to say whether my uncle Gertrude is my uncle or not.
Load More Replies...Agree with 1 to 7, 10, 11, 8 to 9 seems likely. I disagree with 12 because the religion you follow is not hereditary. Etc. Oh dear, I forgot that the numbers change, so cancel that.
Wow, so no one mentioned the 2020 US Presidential election., or did it just get censored? Anyway, was the election stolen from Trump? No. Anyone who believes that is an idiot. Did the Democrats commit widespread voter fraud? Yup. They would have won without it anyway, but they were really just testing the waters for 2024.
That fact that calories in, calories out governs your weight is particularly disliked by Pandas.
There is much more to it. Hormones like insulin, the storage hormon is important. If you eat in a way , that avoids big bloodglucose spikes , you can litterally eat more calories and keep weight. The biochemist Jessie inshaup, or “glucosegoddess” in instagram, or many podcasts, talks about this in layman-terms, and has all the science to explain why. Check it and learn something, that blew my mind, honestly.
Load More Replies...
