26 Books That Parents Read Back In School That They Feel Their Own Children Should Never Read
Interview With AuthorIf you’re anything like us, dear Pandas, then you’re simply obsessed with reading. We devour books one after the other, speed-read chapters during our coffee breaks, and may or may not literally be reading 8 books at the same time. Physical, digital, imaginary—we don’t care about the format.
Even though we personally enjoy experimenting with various weird works of writing, things are a bit different when you’re a parent. Case in point, some grownups spilled the tea in a r/AskReddit thread about what books they read back in school that they’d never, ever want their own children to read. Scroll down to see their opinions and the reasons behind them.
Bored Panda reached out to redditor u/masterbuildera, the author of the viral thread, and they were kind enough to share their thoughts with us.
This post may include affiliate links.
Dianetics, or anything else by L. Ron Hubbard.
Edited to explain why "Dianetics" was read in school: I was a junior in high school. Our AP world history teacher assigned us a project to research a "world religion" outside of the "big 3". Half of the students chose Buddhism, a few chose Hinduism, a few Taoism, a few LDS, etc. But this was '05-'06, and the "Trapped in the Closet" episode of South Park had just come out. Having never before heard of Scientology, I *had* to know if the episode was accurate.
When my mom died, my dad took me to that place for "help". I noped after about a year (15). I have received mail and phone calls for 35 years - new phone numbers, new addresses... they still harass me. They are 100% a cult and want money.
Scientology....a religion that ain't. It's simply a pyramid scheme meant to only benefit the rich. RUN
L Ron Hubbard was a sci-fi writer whose sanity was questionable.
He once bet another writer that he could create a religion and people would follow it. I've been unable to find that fact again - which is weird in itself - but it was true. He was a creep and his books are c**p. Been an SF fan my whole life so I'm speaking from experience.
Load More Replies...Scientology has recently launched a network channel that is included in all packages of Directv... made me gag the first time. From what I understand about Hubbard is he also studied the occult and has performed rituals. So it makes sense his whole plan is evil. Leah Rimini's show was such a roller coaster I know they stopped for safety reasons but I wish that show was still on.
Well, I guess I will never get Direct TV then. That's absolutely disgusting.
Load More Replies...Hubbard's "Battlefield Earth" is a pretty good sci-fi novel, actually... unlike the movie, which was horrendous.
No, it's terrible. Turgid writing, badly plotted, and the neologisms he invents are atrocious. "Picto-cam"? "Kill-club" (as opposed to what, a tickle-club?)
Load More Replies...I'd say that's a good reason to read "Dianetics." Scientology is so secretive. It's a good idea to take any opportunity to learn about it.
As long as you somehow pirate the book, I guess. DO NOT give any money to these monsters.
Load More Replies...The Bible. It's the most sick book i have ever read. For the ones that will downvote or get angry with, I am sure they haven't read it. Both old and new testament. Especially old.
Shakespeare. Not because it is bad but because it's not really meant to be read. It's a performance your supposed to watch it.
You need a good teacher for it too. I had one English teacher who though just reading it to us was an effective teaching strategy, we all failed. We all know the story and main points but he never explained any of the lines but tested us on the lines. Later, I had another teacher who went over Caesar and she was so good, she basically translated line by line and went over everything. She made it really interesting, all while knitting at her desk. I miss her!
Absolutely! We had one teacher who used to make us read out the parts. Different character, different reader. Then you start reading it with expression and it is instantly more enjoyable and easier to interpret.
Load More Replies...For someone studying English as a second language, it's much better to read them than to see them played. Most dialogues -especially in comedies- are fast shooting, full of "don't blink or you will miss" references. I enjoyed reading it first, and later attended performances of practically any major work and I am sure I would not have enjoyed them as much without already having a good grasp of contents and language.
Unlike a lot of classical opera where I often think "are we still talking about this?" classical theater can take some time to absorb and that time doesn't always happen during a performance. That said, reading it without ever seeing it played is also a loss, because well directed and well played theater adds a lot that is otherwise often missed or glossed over.
Load More Replies...Having read some at school, I never realised until I actually saw them performed (at RSC Stratford) that Shakespeare's "comedies" were actually funny, with regular laughs from the audience.
I've never seen a Shakespeare performance (I absolutely want to) but I know any performance can be completely different depending on the delivery. It's insane how different people can make shows completely different
Load More Replies...In high school, one teacher had us memorize Marc Antony's speech from Caesar's funeral (friends, Romans, countrymen...) Most students read it as fast as possible and with no emotion. I was so frustrated with it. I tried to recite it like I thought it should be. My acting skills couldn't quite pull it off, and the other kids thought I was a wee bit unhinged.
The secret is that Antony is being sarcastic
Load More Replies...In my English class we would draw straws for which part you you got to read each day and alot of us just ended up acting while reading in class..like a mini play without sets
we did this a few times in my English class too. But she always made sure she volunteered lol. We actually had a lot of my theatre troupe class in there so it was a lot of fun for us to read a few shows to the class
Load More Replies...Shakespeare also wrote poetry, but most people don't realize that fact cuz his most well-known works are his plays
I don't have or want kids but Flowers In The Attic by V.C. Andrews. I was maybe 11 or 12 when I saw it in my school library and remember my mum mentioned she'd read it in school. Holy hell that was not a book that should have been in a primary school library, the fact it was required reading in my mum's school when she was 14 is even more messed up.
Disturbs me to this day and I read it 45 ish years ago as a 13 year old
Same here. And I kept reading the series! And they portrayed it like it wasn’t a bad thing. Ugh.
Load More Replies...I only realized much later in life how wrong it all was. Never clicked before. I warned my daughter when she found it on my bookshelf, still gave her the choice. She said she would rather not.
This is the way. When they're old enough to handle mature themes, kids should be able to make their own *informed* decisions.
Load More Replies...for sure this one is a no... don't ban it, just don't let elementary school kids read it!
I just started reading the plot on Wiki and I couldn't even finish it. Yikes; that's really messed up.
yeah I read that when I was around 11 - not in school though, found it on my mothers bookshelf. it was my first book for grownups, and it was certainly an eye opener
VC Andrews writes some truly disturbing stuff. I don't know if it's good for any age.
I mixed this up with Flowers for Algernon, and I was thinking, wait that’s a great book! Lol
I actually saw the movie, the 1987 one before I'd heard about the book it was based on. The movie was bad enough so I thought, I'll read the book since most times adaptations are worse for film. Nope. BIG nope. Book was worse, if anything.
My mother gave my two brothers and me each one of the three books in the trilogy for Christmas one year. I was in high school, but my brothers were four and five years younger than me. She did not review the books before giving them to us. I did not read past the first couple chapters, and my brothers didn't even start theirs. Even now, decades later, we can remember how horrible those books were and are horrified she gave them to us.
We got in touch with redditor u/masterbuildera, who started up the viral r/AskReddit thread, and asked them to share a few thoughts. We were curious how they had decided to ask such an unusual and interesting question in the first place.
"I started the thread because I read a book that was not suitable for my age," they opened up to Bored Panda.
They said that they were "traumatized because of it." However, they were unsure if their experience was unique. "So I decided to ask people on Reddit to see if they had read a book like that," u/masterbuildera shared that they were curious how widespread this phenomenon really was.
According to the OP, whether or not banning books makes them more likely to be read by people will depend a lot on the context. The redditor noted that "if the book has strong content," then it wouldn't necessarily be something that others might be very curious about.
F**k catcher in the rye, holden is a whiny little b***h
I don't get it and I don't get why it was banned. I thought it was boring as hell and didn't get anything substantial from it. I am a reader and have read many of the classics, but agree with OP 100%. Total waste of time.
Load More Replies...An insufferable author writes an insufferable book about an insufferable POS human. There’s plenty on this list that are revered for reasons other than the actual writing. This takes the cake.
I greatly disliked this book when I read it in HS. I'd like to think as an adult I would reread it with a different lens but it was honestly so terrible to me as a teenager that I have no desire to pick it up and give it another go lol
Interesting - I read it in my twenties and assumed I was too old for it, because Caulfield came across as a whiny little twat instead of an icon of teen authenticity.
Load More Replies...He’s a traumatized and mentally ill teenager who has gone through the death of his brother, watching one of his classmates kill himself while wearing holdens sweater. At the end of the book he begins the process of healing. Also, the author had PTSD and spent time in a psych ward after having a mental breakdown. Holden may not be a good person, but he is a realistic one. Looks like all of you guys didn’t have the best English teachers.
It’s one of my favorite books. So ahead of its time.
Load More Replies...This is one of my all-time favorite books, and I, too, had a great English teacher, who broke down the symbolism the metaphors it's pretty powerful book
So what! It's a portrayal. The world has plenty of whiney little bitches. There are plenty of characters I've disliked and would never read a second time. I will not, however, judge the merit of a book based on my "taste" in characters.
For me, it's just that this book didn't actually teach me anything. There are plenty of better books out there, plenty of books with better things to talk about, and not that much time to teach, honestly. This book felt like "filler"and I resented it for that.
Load More Replies...I thought so too when I first read it. But upon a second read, I started catching things I missed the first time. There are a lot of layers to this one.
My 5th grade teacher read the Stephen King short story Survival Type to the class. For those who haven’t read: the narrator / mc is a drug smuggler who crash lands his plane on a deserted island. He ends up doing all the heroin he recovered from the crash and cannibalizes himself. We didn’t know at the time our teacher had early onset dementia..
Honestly seems like something I'd be interested in, even back then. Definitely not a book for 11 year olds though.
Yeah.... sounds like a great way to entice 16-18 year olds to read but maaaaaaybe not for preteens.
Load More Replies...Picked up my first Stephen King book when I was 12. Cujo, started in the afternoon, stayed up all night and most of the next. Read it in one sitting
Yup, of all of the list so far, this is one I also read in elementary class. Grade 6 was my first year not in a religion based school and lets just say the reading material is VASTLY different. This one messed me up but got me interested in the horror genre. Very taboo in my household.
Great story. Nothing wrong with kids reading it. Skeleton Crew should be required reading in school.
Go Ask Alice or Jay’s Journal. The “anonymous” person who wrote it was not a young girl or a guy it was a woman named Beatrice Sparks (and probably other who collaborated). She was a conservative and wrote the books based on those ideals in order to “save the children”. Absolute s**t writing and s**t person.
If you want the real deal, try We, children from Bahnhof Zoo by Christiane F.
Go Ask Alice is completely made up. She doesn’t even properly describe the effects of drugs.
Read "Unmask Alice" by Rick Emerson. I can't write more without sputtering with fury.
more details here. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/go-ask-alice-satanic-panic-jays-journal-umask-alice-1380076/
Go Ask Alice is a tale about a young girl who becomes involved in substance abuse and the downward spiral her life takes.
Load More Replies...I read Go Ask Alice last year and I'm still shaken by it. It was very emotional for me to read and it made me see life differently for a while.
Jay's journal is a true story though. The kid really did set himself on fire to try and commit suicide - which is an awful idea BTW. He spent the rest of his life dealing with the burns, but at least he realized he didn't really want to die.
Actually he was a 16 year old from Utah that committed suicide after his girlfriend broke up with him. His mother gave his diary to Beatrice Sparks and without her knowledge, she published a book based on his diary but added all of the satanic b******t.
Load More Replies...I have to admit, I read this many times in high school and I loved it. It was turned into a pretty good movie, too.
Bored Panda wanted to get the thread author's opinion on where the line between censorship and protection lies. We were curious where they think the line is between being too strict and wanting to protect children from being traumatized by books, just like they were in their youth.
"From my perspective, schools need to ban books that are meant for adults," the redditor said that books that are clearly marked mature, meant for 18 and over, shouldn't find themselves in the hands of school kids.
Meanwhile, they added that parents should also observe what books their kids read and what reading lists schools have.
However, it's not all doom and gloom. The redditor noted that even though they were traumatized by a book in their past, they've also found some books that had some tips that directly improved their life.
Maybe this isn’t the question, but I read A Child Called ‘It’ as an elementary aged child. I bought it at the school’s Scholastic Book Fair, and was maybe 9 years old. Why on earth they thought that was an appropriate book for small children to be purchasing and reading, I will never know. The 90’s were a trip.
If you don't know what this book is about, it is a true first person account by someone who suffered prolonged and extreme physical and emotional abuse at the hands of his mother as a child. Not for the squeamish.
I read the first two book. It’s absolutely horrifying, it says in the book it was I think the third worst case of child abuse in California history. I cried several times reading it.
Load More Replies...That's crazy. This book is about parental child abuse. I read it as an adult and still remember the details
I picked it off the shelf, read a few random pages, decided I didn't need to read any more. But I am a wimp.
Load More Replies...Gay cat gods... Why am I thinking about Freddy Mercury?
Load More Replies...This book was on the required reading list for my child in 6th grade. I never understood how a school system that opposes Dr. Suess approved of this.
One of the few books I couldn’t stomach, and I was an adult. Definitely heartbreaking, and absolutely not for young kids!
Hear me out, this is a weird take:
**Cyrano de Bergerac**
Not because it isn't a good story, it is. But because I think high school boys get the wrong message from it and it fuels this incel, neckbeard fantasy of "*I am truly special, and I will pursue this woman until she realizes how special I am. She only likes that other guy because he's cute, it definitely isn't that I'm an a*****e.*" I don't think that's healthy for them, I think a lot of them don't get that it's satire because it's in middle english.
I'm not saying they *can't* read it, but it shouldn't be required as part of the curriculum either (it was for me at least).
I think educators need to frame these works correctly for them to be effective.
Unfortunately, we've lost the thread on satire. How many people fall for the stories in the Onion?
If argue that having this as part of the curriculum and taught accurately would be better than banning it. But then, it would take time away from a different lesson so it's difficult. Incels are becoming a big problem
I don't think books should ever be banned (sometimes titles of articles change around, but mine just says books that parents think their kids should never read) but sometimes books should fade away and be forgotten. But if teachers are going to assign books they should make sure they know what it means first lol. Books should always be available to everyone within the age range. I also think incels need to have a check up for their brain to figure out why they're thinking like that and why it's wrong and that's why nobody likes them not because they like someone else
Load More Replies...You beat me to it, thank you. Just because something is written in verse doesn't mean it's not modern. A lot of people don't realize that Shakespeare is Early Modern English--not Old or Middle.
Load More Replies...Interesting. I never saw it in that light. Now I need to reread it.
Classics from years gone by are not necessarily suitable teaching tools today. I took this in first year university and prof did not mention satire. That's a long time ago and wasn't relevant then.
Cyrano is in "middle English"?? Um, no. The orgiinal is in French, and was written long after the Middle Ages, anyway. This guy must be thinking of Chaucer, who did write in Middle English and did write some rather raunchy (but delightful) tales. But Cyrano de Bergerac was not one of them.
Context is everything when it comes to books like these. Viewing the movie featuring the incomparable Jose Ferrer as Cyrano would likely have it make more sense to teens. I think many of them would secretly sympathize with him, being at the stage where they may worry about rejection themselves.
The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison was rough.
As a victim of childhood SA I wish I didn’t have to quietly relive that trauma in a freshman English classroom full of strangers.
We had to read a handful of books like that (not really but same topics) like Speak and there was a discreet opt-out option, you had to pick a book from the teacher’s shelf and write an essay on it instead
But did you still have to sit in class & listen as others talked about it, or could you leave and make it obvious you were "opting out" so everyone could pester you as to *why* you opted out?
Load More Replies...I had a similar experience with Before We Were Yours in sixth grade… I wish I had at least gotten a warning. All my teacher said was “its a sad story about some young girls”
this is maybe not the time but AYO I LOVE YOUR LOVEJOY PFP
Load More Replies...I had to intervene on behalf of my son regarding an assigned book in 10th grade. He just wasn't ready for it. Sometimes parents need to step in and read the stuff their kids are assigned!
And that's fine but Parents shouldn't be allowed to police what OTHERS read.
Load More Replies...I feel like most of these books just need a preface by teacher so kids can opt out or have parents opt them out. Everyone has different experiences. I was raped at 15 by a "trusted" adult but a book about someone being raped wouldn't traumatize me, I understood that it was HIS problem and not mine. I get that not everyone has my outlook. Banning isn't the answer but perhaps circumvention for the gentler souls amongst us
Being a parent is tough. When it comes to reading, you have to find the right balance between protecting your kids from extremely unsettling ideas while also allowing them to grow and develop their thinking. You can’t expect them to ever think outside the box if they’re kept firmly within it.
When it comes to visual media like movies and TV shows, things are slightly simpler: there are age ratings that help guide parents. However, while some books do have recommendations for age groups, it’s not like you can declare that George Orwell’s ‘1984’ is only ‘meant’ for those 18 years old or over. Imagine the outrage!
The desire to limit people’s access to reading material, in order to protect them (or society at large), can quickly devolve into censorship. However, we all know that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. You have to trust that people will be able to deal with the uncomfortable things they read on a page.
I was in a gifted class and we read 1984...in the fourth grade. Great piece of literature, but maybe a titch intense for nine-year-olds, y'know?
It is a lot to take in 4th grade. A better choice for high school.
Again, agree on this being for older kids.... like who would let elementary school kids read this? I was in high school when we were assigned this.
Don't be a wuss. Children can handle complex ideas, images and social situations. The sooner we teach children about the horrors that humanity is capable of the earlier in their lives they will rise to combat it.
There seems to be a really divided opinion on that. Considering they're pushing kids back at school now. The typical age to finish school is 18+ not 16 or 17 like when I went through. And the number of people who consider young adults children ("oh they're only 20 their brain hasn't finished developing, they're still a kid"). Honestly, I think each child is different and some 10 year olds could handle it and some couldn't. That call needs to be made by people who actually know the child.
Load More Replies...Shouldn't read it before you understand a little more about politics and society. Read it, age 11, and again in 20s. Different perspective when I read it the second time.
Or maybe l you should read it at different ages and compare and contrast your reactions and understandings.
Load More Replies...I read it of my own will when i was 14, even then i found some parts of it a bit unsettling.
Being unsettling is the entire point of the book. If you're unsettled it's usually because you're actually thinking. That's the whole idea.
Load More Replies...
Where the Red Fern Grows- I wept like a baby when I read that book. I don’t want to subject my little one (who loves dogs) to that heartbreak.
I read this when i was young and loved it so much. Its such a magical story about a boy and the strong bond he has with his two hunting dogs. The ending is upsetting but it's 100% worth reading, even for younger children in my opinion. I dont really see why people feel the need to shelter kids from a book like this one. (obviously some books on this list yes, they sound awful). But this book is great!
Agree the book is outstanding but yes the ending was heartbreaking our teacher in 3rd or 4th grade read it to us over the course of a few weeks and the whole class was bawling at the end. Still sticks with me to this day some 40+ years later and makes me love and appreciate the time I have with my dogs even more. So good can come from sorrow.
Load More Replies...Don't you think that dealing with the grief of losing a fictional character can help children be a bit better able to deal with the grief of losing a real pet / friend / family member?
Yes and no. I think it depends on the kid and the situation/circumstances. Most kids are good realizing that books are fantasy, so while they're invested in it while reading it, it's not really "real" so while they get exposed to grief, etc. it doesn't always prepare them for a death that's personal. Kinda like the difference between waves at a beach and a tsunami. The emotions are the same, but the intensity can be ramped up 100x. They'll have experience with the emotions, but not necessarily the intensity/duration of them. Plus losing a loved one of any kind is often daily life changing. I agree it can help, and for some kids maybe more than others, but even as adults we can still be surprised by a tsunami. I might have to research, see if anyone's done any studies about this, would be interesting to read.
Load More Replies...This book is wonderfully bitter-sweet. The ending always makes me cry, but it is still one of my favorite books.
Yikes! That's still to young, imho. It was hard enough in 6th grade.
Load More Replies...Books are the safest way for children to experience a lot of the emotions they need to be familiar with before they grow up. Nothing wrong with a good cry.
I never read the book. I did see the movie ,however, and it still hurts me to this day.
All old classic books about dogs are just their owners (the writers) venting and projecting their grief for their own dog that they lost
Not necessarily, no. When I read this book, or Old Yeller, etc. my dog was still young, happy and healthy. Up until that point, the only pets that I'd lost were fish. It still hit me like a ton of bricks. Classmates who had no pets, ever, were bawling. That's the beauty of books, if you can immerse yourself in them. But also the curse, too.
Load More Replies...Sure. Just get your child to read "Old Yeller" instead. Or better still, "The Yearling." Kids have to learn about grief sooner or later. <3
I love, love, love this book! It was the first book I read that I had to put it down because I couldn't see it through the tears. Sad? Yes. But so beautiful at the same time.
Lord of the Flies. I hate that s**t.
This isn’t about censorship, if my kid wants to read that dogshit book, of course they can. But I’d never recommend it to anybody, or encourage anyone to read it if they were on the fence.
I tried to read it as a kid. Hated it. Tried to read it as an adult. Loved it. One of my favorite genres is something I like to call 'sunny horror', and so few things qualify.
I liked it as a kid, I liked it as an adult - I think the ending sort of went over my head until I read what the author himself had said of it.
Load More Replies...thank god my teacher was amazing, because they did a great job of reminding us that this is not a representation of what happens when humans are left to their own devices. this is what happens when entitled rich white british boys are left to their own devices. this is not applicable to all humanity because those kids did lead very specific and priveledged life before the island. also beauty queens by libba bray does a completely different demographic version of this. i know english teachers who teach these books together to show that even if they're children, they don't arrive in these situations as blank slates. there's context to explain why people behave the way they do
I suppose the teacher thought it was best to present this material from that point of view. I do not agree the value of this book is to show us the very thin line between civilization and savagery. Especially important in the US today!
Load More Replies...Had an amazing English teacher so I enjoyed it. But read it as an adult years later and wow did the message about society hit home
Is it about society or is it about British boarding schools of the time?
Load More Replies...Lord of the flies came to mind as soon as I saw the title of this list. I think I read it when I was 12 or 13 and boy, did I cry when Piggy died. It was a shocking scene that disturbed me for days. I haven’t read it as an adult, so I don’t understand the allegorical aspect. I’ll pick it up soon. Hopefully this year.
I read it in HS. Only managed to read it one time. It was well written but Piggy's death was terrible. Really most things that happened were terrible in the book. Watched some of the movie, but couldn't finish it.
Load More Replies...There was an old Simpsons episode that was in reference to this book that was pretty funny.
Meanwhile, if we’re talking about kids, parents can either help contextualize these ideas or simply explain that the themes are slightly too mature for them at this moment. There’s nothing wrong with putting a book off for a couple of years. Though, naturally, you might make your children even more curious to read them if you ban those novels outright! If it’s forbidden, we can’t help but be even more intrigued…
Reading is such a natural part of our daily lives that some of us can forget that there are plenty of people out there who are illiterate. It’s a luxury to consider what books should or should not be read by our children. ‘Think Impact’ reports that in the United States, 79% of adults are literate. Though this might sound like a big number, it means that a jaw-dropping 21% of all American grownups cannot read. Meanwhile, 54% of adults have literacy below the 6th-grade level.
The World Population Review notes that the 10 least literate countries include Chad (with a 22.31% literacy rate), Guinea (32%), South Sudan (34.52%), Niger (35.05%), Mali (35.47%), the Central African Republic (37.40%), Burkina Faso (41.22%), Benin (42.36%), Afghanistan (43.02%), and Sierra Leone (43.21%).
Poverty and illiteracy are closely linked together. Areas that are deeply affected by poverty offer fewer opportunities for education and, by extension, reading. Meanwhile, instead of going to school, children from poor families might instead find work to help out their families financially. There are around 781 million adults around the globe who cannot read or write, and two-thirds of them are female.
Gone with the Wind. Not because it's offensive (it is) or because it has rape scenes that portray the main character as liking them (it does) or because it depicts slavery from the wrong side of history (it definitely does). No, because it's a 900+ page book that ends and begins without really doing anything, and it doesn't even attempt to show one battle of the Civil War. It's basically Waiting for Godot, but instead of God it's a prissy Southerner who never loved the main character anyways, while the real lover has to rape her to show how much he loves her. It's utter trash.
Margaret Mitchell was born in 1900 in Atlanta, GA, an area in the US still reeling from the Civil War. Her goal was to make a historically accurate depiction of life in the South and the impacts of the War. The book outlines how people were treated, what slavery really was, what it was like to have your property, land completely destroyed because of war, and the attitudes of different plantation owners to slaves. IMO, to judge GWTW by today's standards is to miss the point. The horrors depicted in that book gave me insight to my own prejudices and how to personally combat them.
Yeah it also serves as a good gateway to researching further. The book and movie sent me down the library rabbit hole of inter-library loans to learn about the orphan trains, exodusters, etc. Fascinating history and so heartbreaking.
Load More Replies...I always equated Gone With the Wind with The Great Gatsby. There are some key differences, of course - South versus North, Civil War versus post-WWI - but they just seemed tonally the same. Poor rich people whining about being rich.
Not to mention Gatsby (and most of Fitzgerald's works) was plagiarized from his wife. I can never read it again knowing that
Load More Replies...It doesn't help that this novel has one of the most unpleasant main characters in the history of writing.
The best way to watch the film is to stop at the intermission - where the former slave holders are on their hands and knees out in the fields desparately seeking any form of nuitriion. But I've always been a sucker for a happy ending.
Load More Replies...Nazis for example? Usually the history we in hindsight realise was f-d up and wrong,. It's a commonly used phrase as well, I'm not sure who coined it originally.
Load More Replies...I have read GWTW twice. There is so much richness in this book. The author is showing us traditions and thoughts of the Old South...(no matter how we judge them today.)The heroine matures from a flighty debutante with exclamations of "War! Fiddle dee dee!" to a woman scarred by loss, but determined to rebuild. We know she will overcome all obstacles due to strength of will and her rooted love of the land. Truly, a classic worth another read.
Google Lucille Ball Gone with the Wind. You are welcome. curtains-6...8f19f4.jpg
I believe this is Carol Burnett. Saw this episode of her show and it is really funny.
Load More Replies...
The Kite Runner....my dad saw me pick that up at a book store when I was in the 7th grade and he said no, I wasn't allowed to read that till I got older. Me being the rebellious little s**t I was convinced my friend to buy it and we took turns reading it. Yeah that book is not for kids....I learnt some things that day :(
i read the book in 6th grade and while it is an awesome book it takes some emotional strength to read.
my 7th grade English teacher told me to read it for a book report! i ended up reading A Thousand Splendid Suns as well, that one really messed me up. Khaled Hosseini is a brilliant author, but i was very much not emotionally prepared...
Load More Replies...I read that book in high school. Great book but the subject matter is very tough
Almost like kids need to learn about things especially about the Armenian genoc*de which is to this day being denied happened. The book conveys important themes like how not acting when unjust things occur has consequences which will often be deadly to others and treating people as others brings out the worse by exposing the cruel extent people will go when they view people as not being human. The descendants of those lucky enough to flee the country are told the stories of loved ones not so lucky from childhood and do just fine sheltering kids from that really is a privilege that makes people turn a blind eye when the same things happen elsewhere
Not for kids, but as an audio book it was compelling as read by the author, a beautiful love story. My son recommended it to me at about age 15
The book is very much an emotional ride, I read it as an adult. Probably would not have been mature enough to deal with the subject matter until a senior in high school
It is a wonderful book, just a heartbreaking one. It made me cry several times.
My mum used to use The Giving Tree to guilt me. That book is too easily weaponized
I love Shel Silverstein and this book but using any book to guilt your child is such crappy parenting
Um... your mom is terrible for doing that, this is a sad but sweet book and every kids should read it!!!!
This is a BEAUTIFUL book. Loved it as a kid, love it now, read it to my class every year. If you're using it to guilt (about what?) Then it's your fault, not the book my dude.
This book made me cry. I could cry right now remembering it!
A kid a grade ahead of me in elementary school collapsed on the playground and died, but not before our school counselor did CPR on him till the ambulance came. He ended up dying at the hospital (we later found out he had a heart condition). The school arranged to have grief counselors come to the school and I remember them reading this story to us. May you continue to RIP, Arthur. 💙
I teach with that book and I always ask the kids their take on it. To me it is a cautionary tale of giving so much that you have nothing left for yourself, and taking so much that you never learn to be self sufficient. I just don’t see how people think it is a book about kindness and generosity.
I severely dislike this book. The lesson is that the kid doesn't know when enough is enough and to start giving back instead of someone sacrificing their entirety of being for no good reason.
I know it’s weak, but the ending to Of Mice and Men really messed up my 13 year old brain.
One of my favourite books til this day. First read in school and 25 years later, still remember it like it was yesterday.
We watched the movie in class, I think we were around 14 or something? I cried at the end and the rest of the class made fun of me. At least the teacher defended me
My boyfriend and I saw a live performance, and after it ended, boyfriend asked if we could just sit for a minute. I looked over, he was crying. So we sat for a minute. On the drive home, he told me he wanted to rush the stage and put a stop to the ending.
Load More Replies...while this is a well written book I HATE this story. It breaks my heart and it scarred me...... and I read it in high school!!!!
I hate that this one gets all the press and prestige but the book by author/researcher the material was stolen from is completely ignored (Sanora Babb).
I read a book about King Arthur, I think it was just called "Arthur The King". I enjoyed royalty, Knights, and historical fiction, so it looked like a great pick for me for this book project. It was in my teacher's classroom on a list of approved options.
Y'all, I was not READY for the amount of rape and sodomy in there. It was absurd. I think the book was actually meant to be an erotic novel, it's the only reason I can think of for that much adult content. I'm positive the teacher had never read it herself.
I'm all for kids being exposed to a variety of topics, and teens can be exposed to sexuality, and I was sixteen or seventeen at the time. But this was just beyond anything.
I read Maia, the main character is sold as a sex slave by her 'mother' after her stepdad seduces her. That book sounds like it has less sexual content and it is 1,000+ pages!
I have literally never met another human being that has ever heard of that book, much less read it completely.
Load More Replies...The painting above is N. C. Wyeth’s illustration for “The Boys’ King Arthur,” which is better suited for young readers
I read "Lolita" when I was 14. Though I wasn't disturbed by the content (I'd seen worse at that point), I was shocked that it was in the school's library.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/68268.Arthur_the_King ...read the negative reviews.
I think that the teachers MUST read all books that are on their own lists for such things but given the work teachers face that's unpaid?!?!?!
AN Roquelare (Anne Rice) - The Claiming of Sleeping Beauty. Had to write a book report in middle school and saw this one at the public library. Figured it was just a less "Disney" version (you know, like how most original fairy tales are darker). Yeah, it was a lot less "Disney" unless ol' Walt was really good at hiding his s&m streak....
Oh my God.a book report on?! I recommend this series to anyone who thinks 50 shaded of gray is risqué lmao. I own the hardcover set...found it in the kid's section at Goodwill of all places. It's still the kinkiest thing I've ever read and I used to steal moms romance novels xD I'm Very open minded but would never require a middle schooler to read this. Edit: I think the words erect, c**k, and nipple are on ever single page
Load More Replies...I'm not seeing it that way. It's more of they don't think kids should be reading it. Maybe when they're a little older yk? Books in bookstores have age ranges here (there's some books that you have to be 18+ to even buy). More books should probably have age ranges on them, as a suggestion. We had those at my elementary school, different colors for age ranges. You could check out any book with your grade's color or lower. Some books are just too graphic for younger people and it should be advised that you should probably stay away from them for now.
Load More Replies...
"A Day No Pigs Would Die" was pretty rough in 6th grade. Basically Charlotte's web with HAUNTINGLY graphic depictions of animal husbandry and slaughter. I don't remember getting a lot of value out of it at 11 years old, just pig-blood soaked nightmares lol
I read a lot, on one hand I am now curious to read this but also disgusted and afraid.
Sounds a lot like Upton Sinclair's The Jungle, though in The Jungle, it's the people who get mangled. Incredibly important piece of literature - it prompted the creation of the FDA - just really hard to read as a kid.
My son read Charlotte's Web, said, "He must be a very good writer to make you care so much about a spider," put his head down and sobbed.
"Animal husbandry"? It was human sanctioned pig rape in the hopes of piglets. Maybe it is realistic to what happens on farms, but no 14 year old should have to read about how Robert peck's beloved pig screamed and bled while the male pig had its way
I think they should read this. What’s upsetting is how they keep these things hidden, to this day, the brutality.
Load More Replies...If you're not comfortable with you're food comes from, including what and how living creatures had to be slaughtered in order to make it to your local grocers, I'd recommend becoming vegetarian, not hiding behind ignorance.
Im pretty sure this is also not an unbiased reality of how animal husbandrt works
Load More Replies...I love this book. My father died when I was young and I can’t read this book without being brought to tears. I teach this book to 9th graders and have read it numerous times. It is actually beautifully crafted in how the challenges the young character transforms him from boyhood to adulthood literally wearing his ill fitting father’s clothes at the end.
THIS!!!! I was waiting for this book to show up on this list. I had to read it in the 9th grade and it is hands down the worst experience I have ever had reading a book! I love reading, and can get through a lot of rough stuff in books, but this was so graphicly bad it still haunts me over 20 years later. edit: spelling mistakes from furious typing
i had to read a book called devil’s highway in sophomore year. most of the book was relatively mundane though there were parts graphically describing SA, decaying bodies, and gang violence. I’m a bit squeamish with stuff like that cuz i have an overactive imagination.
Red Badge of Courage was so ungodly boring it almost drove me insane so I would save them that headache
I LOVED Little Women. I also love that people can read the same book and have a completely different experience!
Load More Replies...I was just scrolling to see if anyone else mentioned that. I'm so lost. 🤷♀️
Load More Replies...There's a episode of Wishbone doing this book. It's much better I think that's the only time I've experienced anything with this movie. I do recall Wishbone was quite daper in his Union blues.
The difference between Red Badge of Courage and Little Women IMO - please note IMO only - is RBoC is long and boring to me as a female and LW is long and boring to males. I also hated Catcher in the Rye, Call of the Wild, etc. Loved Pride and Prejudice, Jane Eyre, etc.
The Scarlett Letter that s**t was a grind. I love to read, but I wanted to claw my eyes out so I could stop reading it.
I hope and I pray for Hester to win just one more A
Load More Replies...I disagree this is a good book I liked that even though Hester was shunned by the end she had totally changed the perception of her by being kind. It might be a little wordy but the story is great.
I liked it. It’s a small little book with pretty rounded symbolism, and it’s good for teaching people about symbol, allegory and metaphor. And it involves a female protagonist who manages to stand her ground, and it’s got the red, the black, the green and the dark, so I vote for the book
I actually enjoy his writing style. House of Seven Gables is good too.
Load More Replies...haha i stole this book from school because i liked it so much. dickens is way harder to read imo
Oh God, I couldn't agree more! That book is awful! Nathaniel Hawthorne ruined my junior year of high school. I'm still in contact with one of my favorite teachers from high school. She taught English and proudly says that she never assigned that atrocious book.
I'm of the controversial opinion that not many things are truly inappropriate for children if they're capable of actually grasping the subject matter.
But for me, there is one thing I feel was GENUINELY not appropriate and that I regret exposing myself to:
A Million Little Pieces by James Frey. In 7th grade I stole that book from my parents room [the cover was cool and I loved reading edgy YA fiction].
And just... yeah, I ABSOLUTELY didn't need to be consuming that novel as a 12 year old. I was easily old enough to grasp drug abuse and rape, but it was just... a f*****g LOT. I don't recall the experience very fondly.
James Frey is a con artist and general POS. None of what happens in this supposed autobiography actually happened.
I knew it was BS from the first quarter of the book when he describes having to get dental work with no anaesthesia because he was an addict. Novacaine is not addictive in any way and there is absolutely no reason he would not have been given that, or even knocked out, because he was supposedly in recovery. I work in the medical field and instantly knew this was all made up. There is no dentist or drug program that would ever subject a person to extensive dental work without anesthesia. It still shocks me how many people believed this story.
Load More Replies...Rape books should never be forced on youth. They traumatized me as a teen and that’s even before I was raped.
After Frey's admission on Oprah that his "biography" was actually fiction, I refuse to read any of his books.
To be fair, because I did a deep dive, lol he originally wanted to release it as fiction and the publisher convinced him otherwise, then tried to deny it…. His “comeback” novel “Bright Shiny Morning” was really good. I was more pissed off about JT Leroy… talk about a scam!,
Les Miserables. Sophomore year. Just too long. I failed English because of it. It was just a basic English class not English Literature.
I read it years later and it is long but, one of the best endings of any novel ever.
I read this for fun when I was 14 and loved it, but it took me months. If I knew it was required reading with a time limit on it I would have freaked.
I agree. I loved this book, but I certainly couldn't have read it in a few weeks.
Load More Replies...Hugo is famous for his long and useless descriptions. Good book but could have been shorter 😅😅
I read this book - there was a ten page chapter that described the wildness of a garden. That was it - a garden. It was wild. It was a wild garden. Two or three paragraphs would have been more than sufficient. Ten pages was ridiculous.
Load More Replies...Now this makes sense. As a French, I just find it weird that this monument of the French literature is used in English classes.
Load More Replies...Holy c**p you guys have to read it in school?! I read it for fun and for getting in character (I was in our schools production of les mis), and it’s definitely the kind of book that’s great when reading for fun but you would grow to hate if you were forced to read it. It’s really long, and if you have ADHD then sometimes it’s like writing with a marker running out of ink; you have to read the sentence over and over before the meaning finally sinks in.
Read the abridged version: about a million fewer pages of "viva la France" stuff lol
My favorite piece of literature ... not for everybody, but if you look at it as 5 books in one and pace yourself, it is a satisfying read ...
(In case you're not joking that the title is (in) French,) Les Miserable is French literature, not English Literature. Written by Victor Hugo, the novel was published in 1862; the first 2 (of 7) English translations were available that same year.
Load More Replies...
I was supposed to read Night John in 4th grade. We stopped when parents complained about the vivid description of a slave being ripped apart by dogs. I’d definitely let me kids read it but not in 4th grade.
No, I don't agree with this one. Kids need to know the horror of slavery. They need to know why Black people are so angry, even now.
Yes they need to know, but 9 year olds can be exposed to it without this book. The book is better reading to at 14ish probably.
Load More Replies...I read Roots when I was 9. It was not part of an assignment, I was just a fan of Martin Luther King and Roots was in the theaters at that time so I read it. I think these books are important but support and guidance for children is needed, particularly for kids who don't have it at home.
Ahh, Roots, yeah. I remember my Mom and I read the book, then watched the mini series. I remember ENDLESS screaming matches/fights, between my Mom and Dad. Dad always claiming that it was all lies, and Mom defending it. Wasn't until ages later that some official verdict was reached that while, yes, it was very representative, it was ultimately fiction. Dad gloated, while Mom wasn't wrong either. I hated my house growing up sometimes.
Load More Replies...Maybe middle school? But no problem with school age kids reading, they need to know, spelling edit
I almost threw up in school because I was forced to read this and I have mirror touch, so the toe scene was too much for me. There are plenty of slavery novels that are valid that don’t involve such graphic scenes that would be better suited to 8th graders. I wasn’t okay and should have just walked out of class. We had to read it aloud in small groups. I was in the advanced reading group but I could have grasped the concept much better without that imagery which was truly too too much for me. You just unlocked a memory for me that I’d forgotten.
Heart of Darkness. It's just so f*****g boring and a waste of hours of my life.
The worst part is it has the potential to be exciting and interesting. Cannibals and wild animal attacks. But the God damn main character is more focused on how many bolts and nuts he needs to fix his damn boat.
I tapped out on HoD in high school. That book was so terribly slow. I bought the Cliffs Notes for that book and I was able to pass the quizzes and write a paper. Only time I ever did that.
Good thing you didn't just see the movie and right your paper on the smell of napalm
Load More Replies...I think HoD makes more sense when you understand that it was written to draw attention to the appalling conditions for locals in Congo and the impacts of colonialism. If you read it purely as an action novel, then yes it is a poor action novel.
Odd, since it's so short. Sure it's more psychological than an adventure story - if that's what they expected - but it's a quick read.
Sigh 6.0. The audible version with Kenneth Branagh narrating is a true delight of epicurean satisfaction. Highly recommended!
For similar reasons Cold Sassy Tree. I don't know why my English teacher was so in love with that book. It was the most boring thing I've ever read in my life
My mom had us read it aloud for school and nothing really stuck, we didn't even finish it,....BUT the 2nd time, we used it for typing practice and slowing down and actually having to type It up made a huge difference, it came across as artfully, (if still heavily) worded, as opposed to just an onslaught of adjectives.Even mesmerizing. Just had to slow down. Although it should be said,we were like ,late teens. Not saying it's for kids. My bro and I still joke about the other guys leaping off the boat to avoid listening to any more of Marlowe's story, lol
Was given The Things They Carried in HS and had nightmares for weeks because I had a brother overseas in combat at the time. Part of me never wants my kids to read it because of how much it negatively effected me, which I know isn't a good reason. I do think it is a worthwhile book but it will always, always make me uncomfortable.
This book and "All Quiet on the Western Front" should be required reading for all young men aged 17. There's been too much celebration of war in this country over our history. War is not glorious or adventurous, it is absolute hell. All young men need to know the truth about it before some recruiter comes to them in their foolish young age to capture them with the bullsh*t fantasy of "seeing the world" and "being a warrior." These readings will destroy some of the naivete in many young men.
"All Quiet on the Western Front" should be a must-read for everyone, period. I was shocked to find it had fallen off required reading lists around me.
Load More Replies...I also read this book in HS, and it helped me in a way. My dad was a Vietnam vet who never ever talked about his experience there, due to some pretty obvious trauma. While I understand OP's perspective, this book gave me some perspective that I really needed at the time.
Another one that I had to read was Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee.... I've hated cowboys ever since I was little and it was just more of the same old Manifest Destiny B******t!
If you dig deeper, it gets even worse, because the atrocities on both sides were just..heinous. It was a constant back and forth of an eye for an eye, and it had no end in some places. I don't just mean military units going up against tribes, but tribes would retaliate against the settlers in general if they couldn't get to the troops. Even some settlement locations that had good relations with the tribe/s would get targeted and mass slaughter ensued. The troops would kill women and children, so the tribe would kill settler women and children. In some cases, it was total butchery of organs being removed, etc. It was nasty on both sides and it's always heartbreaking to read.
Load More Replies...I'm currently in high school, read this in January with my class and really enjoyed it. I'm in College Prep English and I, and many of my classmates, like reading about horrible events, immoral actions, trauma, and mental illness and picking the stories apart and analyzing each part of them to gain a better understanding. The point of some stories isn't to wrap you up in a cozy little security blanket where you can pretend nothing is ever wrong in the world, some stories were written to relay real things that have happened/can happen, explore the depths of the human mind, and force the atrocities of individuals and society out into the open. Should students be given content warnings? Yes. Should students be given the option to read another book if the first one is/could be triggering for them? Yes. But, especially during high school and even more so 11th and 12th grades, students should at least be given the option to read this kind of content, or even be required to in some cases.
We are actually reading this book now (high school juniors — 16 and 17). My teacher did give the proper warnings about it and I’m sure talked to kids who didn’t feel comfortable reading it. I’m a big Stephen King fan, so gore doesn’t really bother me. I like this book so far!
I read the book when my son was in middle school. Harrowing, but so is war. It’s why we should be judicious before starting them. Looking at you Putin!
I’m so sorry you went through that. I’m sure that was ridiculously hard
American Psycho.
It was absolutely required reading at my high school. Not even the worst thing we read. To be fair. The school I went to was a hell hole. Nothing about that place was right....
Load More Replies...I had this book assigned for a class in second year university. Even at 18 this book seriously messed with my head.
I read this when I was 19 or 20. I liked the film, and wanted to be edgy. Also, as an English literature student, I tried to analyse it, with limited success. I remember liking it, but I was possibly convincing myself to like it. I read it again 3 or 4 years later, without those b******t ulterior motives, and I hated it. It was so disturbing. Haven't ever been inclined to revisit it, or the film, since then.
I was in high school when this came out. I was a huge Bret Easton Ellis and Tama Janowitz fan at the time.
Alright, I’ll be the one to ask. I have never heard of it before, can someone describe it WITHOUT vivid detail?
Psychopathic serial killer describes his exploits in graphic detail in between descriptions of his wealth, wardrobe and other signs of his worldly success. Either really a killer or delusional, you decide.
Load More Replies...I read a lot of these books. Some of them are trash, some are really dependent on maturity level. What is appropriate for one 12 year old may not be appropriate for another... In my daughter's kindergarten teacher conference, I was told to read my daughter "more age appropriate books" because she loved The Raven. I used to say "Quoth the raven!" And she would hiss "Nevermore!" I ignored that request.
The Exorcist was released when I was nine or so. Mom wouldn't let me see it. Checked it out of the library. Book is way more intense than the movie. My folks never restricted my reading. I appreciated that.
Great for your parents.mine didn't either and I never restricted my daughters. I think every kid is different and what we enjoy and what we can do at a given age level varies from how we erased and who we became.
Load More Replies...You title is wrong. This one is about books children read that really aren't for children.
Yeah, many of these books are pretty great as long as you don't read them when you're 9.
Load More Replies...Nobody should dictate to others, even their own children, what books they can or cannot read. If you feel a book is too grown up for your child then explain to them that they should wait until they are older so they can understand it better and to be honest if your child is old enough to understand the story and the context of the book then they are old enough to read it, if not then it is most likely that they will soon give up on a book they don't understand.
Just because a parent does not agree with the themes or characters in a book or simply finds it boring doesn't mean that a book should not be read--I feel that is getting dangerously close to censorship and book banning. Some of the people in these comments are saying that a book should not be read by their child just because they don't care for a character of find the book boring or too graphic. Yes, there are some books that contain themes that may be extremely heavy for a younger audience and should therefore be read by an older audience or discussed first. However, to shield a child from reading something because a parent finds it darker just doesn't sit right with me. There are always going to be books that make us to uncomfortable and challenge our world views. But to deny someone the right to read them because you don't agree with the themes sounds like censorship to me. What a weird thread...
Everything's slowly turning into Fahrenheit 451. Which is honestly sad.
Load More Replies...We had to read some pretty tedious books at school. I remember having to drag myself through Far From The Madding Crowd and The Mayor Of Casterbridge. One I wasn't forced to read, but was rather weird for a child to read was Duncton Wood - contained a lot of gore and violence - I thought it was going to be a nice story about moles. :(
Ahhh...Far From The Madding Crowd . I was forced to read it at school and HATED it. So little happens over its 10 million pages...almost nothing at all for the first half of the book. It's awful and nobody could ever convince me otherwise.
Load More Replies...I have always encouraged my son to read anything he wants to. He knows that if he has questions, or just wants to share, I'm always available. The way I see it, is you should be thrilled if your child can/will read.
I think that is an amazing way to approach learning and foster a love for reading!
Load More Replies...Most of these missed the entire point of the books and believe kids can't handle knowing about the unjust and cruelty that has/could occur. That's a luxury not afforded to those with generation trauma caused by many the topics. Kids aren't stupid they can handle these topics and discussion of them. Teaching kids to recognize the horrors that can occur helps them fight it and often has the effect of them intentionally spreading kindness
I agree with you as long as the topics are realistic, but there really is just some trash out there in the literary world. Take smut, for instance, which has a tendency to age badly because of how unrealistic it is. It's just someone's warped fantasy, and often portrays human behavior in nonsensical, degrading, and unrealistic ways. Which is fine for an adult who understand that's exactly what they're reading. Younger individuals might have a harder time sussing the author out from behind the story. There's just some garbage out there that has no business making smart children question reality and making them feel insecure over something that happened in the author's head. The reality is, people can write anything, and all it has to do is be entertaining in order to sell.
Load More Replies...I read a lot of these books. Some of them are trash, some are really dependent on maturity level. What is appropriate for one 12 year old may not be appropriate for another... In my daughter's kindergarten teacher conference, I was told to read my daughter "more age appropriate books" because she loved The Raven. I used to say "Quoth the raven!" And she would hiss "Nevermore!" I ignored that request.
The Exorcist was released when I was nine or so. Mom wouldn't let me see it. Checked it out of the library. Book is way more intense than the movie. My folks never restricted my reading. I appreciated that.
Great for your parents.mine didn't either and I never restricted my daughters. I think every kid is different and what we enjoy and what we can do at a given age level varies from how we erased and who we became.
Load More Replies...You title is wrong. This one is about books children read that really aren't for children.
Yeah, many of these books are pretty great as long as you don't read them when you're 9.
Load More Replies...Nobody should dictate to others, even their own children, what books they can or cannot read. If you feel a book is too grown up for your child then explain to them that they should wait until they are older so they can understand it better and to be honest if your child is old enough to understand the story and the context of the book then they are old enough to read it, if not then it is most likely that they will soon give up on a book they don't understand.
Just because a parent does not agree with the themes or characters in a book or simply finds it boring doesn't mean that a book should not be read--I feel that is getting dangerously close to censorship and book banning. Some of the people in these comments are saying that a book should not be read by their child just because they don't care for a character of find the book boring or too graphic. Yes, there are some books that contain themes that may be extremely heavy for a younger audience and should therefore be read by an older audience or discussed first. However, to shield a child from reading something because a parent finds it darker just doesn't sit right with me. There are always going to be books that make us to uncomfortable and challenge our world views. But to deny someone the right to read them because you don't agree with the themes sounds like censorship to me. What a weird thread...
Everything's slowly turning into Fahrenheit 451. Which is honestly sad.
Load More Replies...We had to read some pretty tedious books at school. I remember having to drag myself through Far From The Madding Crowd and The Mayor Of Casterbridge. One I wasn't forced to read, but was rather weird for a child to read was Duncton Wood - contained a lot of gore and violence - I thought it was going to be a nice story about moles. :(
Ahhh...Far From The Madding Crowd . I was forced to read it at school and HATED it. So little happens over its 10 million pages...almost nothing at all for the first half of the book. It's awful and nobody could ever convince me otherwise.
Load More Replies...I have always encouraged my son to read anything he wants to. He knows that if he has questions, or just wants to share, I'm always available. The way I see it, is you should be thrilled if your child can/will read.
I think that is an amazing way to approach learning and foster a love for reading!
Load More Replies...Most of these missed the entire point of the books and believe kids can't handle knowing about the unjust and cruelty that has/could occur. That's a luxury not afforded to those with generation trauma caused by many the topics. Kids aren't stupid they can handle these topics and discussion of them. Teaching kids to recognize the horrors that can occur helps them fight it and often has the effect of them intentionally spreading kindness
I agree with you as long as the topics are realistic, but there really is just some trash out there in the literary world. Take smut, for instance, which has a tendency to age badly because of how unrealistic it is. It's just someone's warped fantasy, and often portrays human behavior in nonsensical, degrading, and unrealistic ways. Which is fine for an adult who understand that's exactly what they're reading. Younger individuals might have a harder time sussing the author out from behind the story. There's just some garbage out there that has no business making smart children question reality and making them feel insecure over something that happened in the author's head. The reality is, people can write anything, and all it has to do is be entertaining in order to sell.
Load More Replies...
