14submissions
Finished
Hey Pandas, What’s The Best And Worst Movie Adaptation Of A Book You’ve Ever Seen, And Which Version Was Better?
The title of best, the title of worst, and which version of each was better (book or movie).
This post may include affiliate links.
Best Leo’s Gatsby and worst Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. They left out so many details about Voldemort’s past which made me understand why he was how he was.
I think the problems with the HP movies started way back at Goblet of Fire. That was the book they should have split in two. The series has a parallel structure, and GoF as the lynchpin in the middle is crucial for setting up the entire second half. The movie left *so much* out to save run time that they kept running into compounding issues after that until it all came to a head in HBP, which, yeah, was the worst movie as an individual piece of work.
Worst - it's a tie between Eragon, Percy Jackson, and Mortal Instruments: City of Bones. All good-to-excellent books with compelling characters and plots that should translate easily to a visual medium, and huge potential for big franchise money. All ruined by studios who wanted a quick cash grab and figured teenagers were so stupid and shallow that there was no need to bother with little things like plot or writing or good acting. The movies drip with condescension, carelessness and cheapness, and it's incredibly frustrating watching the same thing happen over and over.
Best - How To Train Your Dragon, which is interesting because on the surface the plot is nothing like the books. However, Cressida Cowell was involved in the script writing, and it shows, because despite the total rewrite, they held onto the true heart of the books - Being A Hero The Hard Way. At the core, it's still a story about having to work and struggle at things that seem to come naturally to everyone else - about fighting to find a place in a world that doesn't always seem to have room for you.
I’ve read all of those (for the worst one) and all of the movie’s literally SUCK
My best would definitely be Harry Potter #5 Order of the Phoenix because that is my least favorite book in the series, and they made my personal favorite movie in the series. Clearly, I like the movie better. My worst would be Artemis Fowl. It is so bad. It strays way too far off from the plot of the book. Not only this, but it makes Artemis seem way more emotional than he is in the book. Plus, when it is relevant to the plot, it uses exactly what the book says and I hate that. By the way, Artemis Fowl got an 8% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Worst- it's probably a tie between Inkheart and Allegiant, for the same reason.
It's good acting subject to bad writing. In my opinion, a movie has to follow the general plotline and meaning of the book. Inkheart gets the meaning but changes the ending, which I believe ruins Dustfinger's character (although I love Brendan Fraser in it). Allegiant... It's a hot mess... No. Books were better for both.
Best- The Fault in Our Stars
This one keeps the plotline and the message! Yes, I miss some parts, especially with the Hectic Glow, but it still hits the same as the book. Although I still think the book is better.
Harry Potter and the Order Of The Pheonix (the movie) drives me crazy because they left so much important information out of the movie. I won't spoil it but I highly reccomend you read the book.
I really loved the Hunger games movies! Better than the books!
I HATE WITH MY ENTIRE SOUL HEART AND MIND THE PERCY JACKSON MOVIES OMG. They got every single thing wrong and I hate it!!! I love PJ and those movies are a disgrace
Best: The Shawshank Redemption
based on Rita Heyworth and the Shawshank Redemption by Stephen King
Close 2nd: Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas by Hunter S. Thompson, starring Johnny Depp and Benicio del Toro.
Worst: The Da Vinci Code / Angels & Demons
Even Tom Hanks couldn't save them. Getting a clue, solving it, running somewhere to get the next clue, solving it, ad nauseam.
For me the best is His Dark Materials based on Philip Pullman's trilogy. Surprisingly, they seem as an extension of each other and both are really good. I would recommend first watch, then read.
The absolute worst is the Chronicles of Narnia movie adaptation. I read the book for the first time (in translation into my native language) at the age of 9 or 10, and was truly fascinated by this magical world, its origin, its creator, its dwellers and pure, unique beauty. Then I bought the book in the original with the money from my first official salary after graduation (22 y.o.) and once more found myself in the place that has been in my heart since childhood. And then the films came. I was eager to see them, but ... I found the film characters too shallow and unlikable, stories simplified and a lot of important things left out, all the beauty of the story gone and standardized and everything was just wrong.
Best- To Kill a Mockingbird. Gregory peck is just đź’Ż
Worst- Cats. Yes. There. Is. A. Book. I haven't read it but it can't be as tragic as that film
Best… maybe Hunger Games, the first one, although I haven’t seen it in a while. Worst movie is most definitely Percy Jackson And The Lightning Thief, literally it left out the exploding bus! And instead of a fight with the war god Ares, he fights Luke, which doesn’t happen in the book! Like excuse me!!! That’s literally a whole different plot!!!
The specific flavor of terrible for Percy Jackson was like, 'Well, of course *I* can write a better story than a *mere children's book author*' combined with 'It's just a dumb story for dumb teenagers. Shove a romantic subplot in their face, they won't notice anything else so there's no point spending money.' If you look up Dominic Noble on YouTube, he did a really good breakdown of just how bad it was.
My best would be Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, and my worst, the Percy Jackson series. Like seriously, it is nothing like the books and has a whole different plot!
Literally all the Percy Jackson series SUCKS the books are amazing, but the movies? đź‘Ž
Best- either Hunger Games or To Kill a Mockingbird
Worst- The Giver or Gone Girl
The Giver was... odd. It was like they just didn't quite trust the subtlety of the original story to get the point across? I'm not generally a fan of the way we divide movies into 'serious films that win awards' and 'big flashy movies that make money,' but that one needed to be more art-house and less blockbuster. A quieter, less action-hero tone would have helped it a lot.
So the book The One and Only Ivan is my ABSOLUTE FAVORITE!! i figured out they made a movie of it so of course i watched it! no. it was NOTHINNG like the book and it skipped over some of my favorite parts in the book. i totally recommend reading TOaOI but i DO NOT recommend watching the movie
also idk if i answered the question properly but yeah. my feedback on TOaOI 👍🏻👍🏻
Goodfellas and Casino were great. Martin Scorsese really captured the essence of the books. Of course he had to cut it down a bit, but he kept a lot of the details intact.
The Devil's Advocate surprised me. Loved the movie, but when I finally read the book thinking I was in for a treat, I was really disappointed.
Not a huge fan of the Twilight series, but I thought they did really great adapting to film, keeping a lot of the details from the books.
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas is another good one.
I'll probably be hated for this one but I love both the Shining movie and the book. Yes, they were really different, but I still enjoy them both.
