ADVERTISEMENT

There are some buildings on the planet that will simply take your breath away: the Taj Mahal, La Sagrada Familia in Barcelona, the Colosseum, the Blue Mosque in Istanbul, and the Sistine Chapel, among others of course. These are true testaments to the incredible structures that humans can create when they have the vision, energy and resources.

Nowadays, however, it’s rare to find a new building that makes visitors say anything other than, “It’s alright.” And one Twitter account that’s dedicated to calling out lackluster modern architecture is Culture Critic. Below, we’ve gathered a list of pics from this page that might make our ancestors shudder, so enjoy scrolling through, and be sure to upvote the ones that make you wish you had lived several hundred years ago!

#1

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

The Culture Critic Twitter account has only been around since 2020, but it’s already made quite a name for itself on the site, amassing an impressive 718.4k followers. The page has a simple description, stating, “Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire.” And over the past few years, it has shared nearly 1,400 tweets celebrating amazing art and architecture of the past, while also calling out some of the most disappointing pieces and structures of our modern day.

Of course, everyone is allowed to have their own preferences when it comes to which buildings they consider the most impressive or most amazing in the world. But if you take a look at almost any list featuring the planet’s most breathtaking structures, you’ll quickly find that many of them were built at least a century ago. Plenty were even built several hundred years ago! So why don’t we create buildings like we used to anymore? Clearly, we still find them beautiful, so what happened to ornate churches and stunning state buildings? First, let’s take a look at Gothic architecture in particular.  

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Newspire, you don’t see Gothic buildings popping up in your city today due to several reasons: these structures are incredibly expensive to build and maintain, the style isn’t really in fashion anymore, and there aren’t enough skilled stoneworkers to create the intricate designs today. Building planners would be required to pay a pretty penny for these kinds of structures, and they don’t always have the resources or time needed. Also, no matter how much you may love the Notre-Dame, this style of building has been deemed outdated.

The peak of Gothic architecture was around the 12th and 13th centuries, and since then, the Renaissance and Baroque styles pushed these designs out of the forefront of architects' minds, and they have rarely been revisited since. And nowadays, it would be extremely challenging to find builders who are familiar with and skilled enough in the construction techniques needed to perfect a gorgeous Gothic building.      

#7

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
aasmith1401 avatar
Adam S
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It’s not about human spirit, it’s about most rent for least land & building costs 😕

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

But of course, Gothic structures are not the only gorgeous buildings that we don’t see anymore. So why are modern structures so ugly? Well, according to Nader Sammouri at ADF Magazine, a lot of it comes down to today’s architecture being a business. There’s not as much of an emphasis on aesthetics or creating a beautiful structure that will complement a city. Architects are often given small budgets and strict time constraints, so they make do to earn a paycheck. Plus, there are many other factors at play today, including government regulations, safety codes and political agendas that may impact how much freedom an architect actually has.

#10

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Despite being eyesores, many modern buildings are actually terrible for our planet as well. John Barham wrote a piece for Medium explaining how the materials used nowadays make buildings last for much less time than their predecessors. “Switching from wood, bricks, and stone, to concrete, composites, and plastics is a big part of the issue, as these new ‘low maintenance’ components often really mean ‘un-maintainable’ and so become destined for landfills,” Barham writes. “For example, while a wooden sash window will need regular repainting it can last hundreds of years, but a plastic window once damaged will need to be completely thrown away.”

ADVERTISEMENT
#13

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
bemcath avatar
tobb-1 avatar
WindySwede
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I like that the French try to make new extensions a modern complement to the one already existing! Maby Kanada,Toronto, have similar thoughts?

Load More Replies...
rabitaille avatar
Paul Rabit
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

There are millions of buildings that look like the one on the left. Whether you like this or not, at least the architect TRIED something new and different on the right, instead of just beholding a new building that looks like an old one. I for one think this is kinda cool.

alex_100 avatar
Alex
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I love this building. Museum of natural history in Toronto. Cool from the inside in those front rooms also

thaleiac avatar
I Like This One
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's as if an asteroid fell on to the old building and almost destroyed it. I like it too

kayjunmoon avatar
Kayjunmoon
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Honestly, fabulous. Love the juxtaposition. I bet it is great inside too.

insanitytwin1 avatar
JLN
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

At first I HATED this design, but after seeing it in person it is actually beautiful, it's such a contrast of old and new it really works, even the inside is such a great melding of old and new. And it also fits really well into the surrounding neighbourhood

kathleen_evans avatar
Kathleen Evans
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I like both. But i wish it didn't look like the new building is eating the old

yukonbee avatar
Bidango Smith
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That's the Royal Ontario Museum's Crystal. It's actually quite beautiful inside and out. Because most of the windows tilt down, the space has an abundance of natural light without too much direct sunlight that could damage the exhibits.

michaelfuhry avatar
Michael Fuhry
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I consider it likely that Culture Critic and their opinions are nigh on close to pedantic, and often idiotic. There are some truly exceptional architects practicing today, and many of their works are breathtaking. Romanesque, and Beaux Arts and swanky Art Deco are all very nice, but a world in stasis is a f#$king bore.

nancyparkinson avatar
nancy
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I don't recall the name of the architect, but I do remember that his original design was breathtaking, with mostly glass walls. This is the compromise (perhaps for cost, or functionality?). It's still beautiful, but the original sketches/concept was superior.

david_a_paterson avatar
David A Paterson
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

For a really awful example of this type of off-angle facetting, see Federation Square in Melbourne. Most other architects have done it well.

sarawilson_2 avatar
Sara Wilson
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Actually, I'd say the person that PAID AND implemented this, would b...

dlhrston avatar
David Henry
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Like...on it's own sitting out somewhere, this MIGHT be something. But squeezing into the other building like it's holding the other buildings hand while it leans over to vomit in the street. Vomit in the street is actually what I think I'll start calling this.

bobeckert avatar
Bob Eckert
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We must make a prison for architects who do things like this

andrewmcloughlin avatar
Andrew McLoughlin
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

They ruined the good dinosaur wing for this. Even worse, it looks like an Apple Store on the inside. Such a senseless mistake.

bakurazbaby1 avatar
Worst Cop in Britain
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

But this is so cool tho!! Gosh I'd love to photograph this building!! What and where is it??

awdragonfly avatar
Amina Wijntje
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's beautiful! I also like the combination of old school and modern.

kate_quantrell avatar
Cate
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The trouble is that the unique, modern addition is screaming "look at me". It is probably lovely to be inside, but is entirely unsympathetic to the surroundings. The architect cared more about their calling card than the environment in which they were working.

grant-mcinnes avatar
I agree with you but...
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The original brick building already had quite a sympathetic addition done in the 80s. Unfortunately it was centred around some greenery that had to be removed because of a permanent tropical cockroach infection:). It also added very little gallery space given it's footprint. This addition was even worse in that respect. It didn't add much usable space-the angular walls make it hard to work with. And the brightness you'd expect isn't there because all the windows are boarded off to protect artifacts from light. Oh, and of course, like all these projects, it leaked. Hopefully they've found ways to mitigate those things now. But at the time it felt like classic architecture wank where much more attention was paid to the form rather than the needs for function.

amytroupe avatar
Amy T
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

So, the bland boxes I kind of get because they're cheaper. This was definitely not cheap.

jaredrobinson avatar
Jared Robinson
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

That's f*****g cool. Future breaking out of the past. No wonder humans never do make any progress.

klynch4 avatar
LokisLilButterknife
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is actually really wonderful architecture in my opinion. It is the Museum of Natural History in Toronto, Canada. I love how they combined the old with the new.

markglass avatar
Lotekguy
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Looks like proof of UFOs when one of the alien spaceships crashed in an urban area.

livingexample avatar
Living Example
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

To me it looks like it represents the new stark designs emerging from and at the same time destroying the classic designs.

pavelkrusstev avatar
Pa4040
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Its like the original building died, and a team of top scientists ressurected it via cybernetics. "We have the technology "

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

Barham also notes that the ideology behind modern architecture is a problem as well. He notes that architects today argue that because beauty is subjective, they don’t need to worry about intricate details or trying too hard to make a structure stunning. “When they find themselves bored by the dullness of a sheer glass and concrete façade of a pastiche Minimalism, they turn to irregular, incoherent, asymmetric shapes, or uncomfortable cantilevers,” Barham writes. “They claim their brief is to shock with ‘originality’ or to ‘challenge’ the public. The results are anti-human buildings that do not ‘spark joy’.”  

ADVERTISEMENT

Creating buildings while solely being concerned with function also does a disservice to future residents or occupants, as they will no doubt want to renovate or rebuild. If the structure isn’t timelessly beautiful, there’s no reason to preserve it. And the cycle of tearing down and using resources to rebuild continues. So the solution to this, Barham suggests, is to actually build structures intended to last forever. He notes how many pre-modern buildings have been homes, offices, retail spaces and gone back and forth between all of the above simply because the spaces were so beautiful and timeless that there was no desire to alter them. 

#20

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
lily_7 avatar
Lily from England
Community Member
8 months ago (edited) DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

“FLAT. IT NEEDS TO BE FLAT. sorry for my outburst, but it needs to be so that if giants invade, they can sit down comfortably, without something spiking up their a*se.”

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

According to ScienceNordic, beauty in architecture can even be used as a strategy for sustainability. Nicolai Bo Andersen, associate professor at the Institute for Architecture and Culture at the Royal Danish Academy for Fine Arts, School of Architecture, says that it’s important to focus on aesthetics and ensuring that buildings can physically stand the test of time. “It’s a question of how we experience architecture,” Andersen says. “A building’s form, color, proportions, materials, and daylight, directly affect the human body and give a feeling of connectedness to the world. Beauty may be understood as the uplifting feeling experienced through the body and the senses.” 

ADVERTISEMENT
#22

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
stackhouse-charlotte avatar
The Kitten Overlord
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu

We’re not saying it’s impossible to create a beautiful building today, but obviously, structures like the Sistine Chapel don’t pop up every day. It’s important to keep enjoying and preserving these amazing buildings, and perhaps one day we will have another creation on par with the Taj Mahal. And if not, at least we can continue admiring the one and only. And roasting all of the ugly, lackluster modern buildings on Twitter! 

#25

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
showthyself avatar
Show Thyself
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It has been destroyed during war. They weren't able to rebuild the church, since the material was needed elsewhere. But when they did have the resources, they didn't want to rebuild it (since it wouldn't be authentic), but to build something to remember the lost beauty. Because of that, the new building is kept simple and the arc + round window are slightly off. (The bomb destroyed the building above the arc through the window, and the arc by itself leaned a bit to the side.) Today it's like a canvas, at least for me. I see the pictures of the original building, and can easily imagine as a layer above the new one, since it is so simple - nearly plain - but in the correct location.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#27

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Are these pictures making you ashamed to be living in modern times, pandas? Unless you’re an architect with an unlimited budget, don’t beat yourself up. It’s not your fault! But we hope you’re enjoying these reminders of how amazing old buildings are and that we should do everything we can to preserve them. Keep upvoting the pics that hit home for you, and then if you’re interested in checking out another Bored Panda article featuring questionable modern architecture, look no further than right here!

#28

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
carolyngerbrands avatar
Caro Caro
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

A few houses here where I live have been "modernized" and they look like a sore thumb in the nieghbourhood. Such a shame.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
See Also on Bored Panda
#29

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
smurphette avatar
GadgetGirl
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Why? Rich people don't buy are to look at. They buy it because it's got a high value that will likely keep going up. It's a way to store their money.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#31

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
fredito-mercurio avatar
Daniel Gómez
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

The sponsored this restoration so... also they did it for its historical and artistic value, nor because of its religious purposes since many Europeans, including the French, are blatant atheists or agnostics.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#32

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
robshelton avatar
Rob
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Last time I was back home, this was still in existence at Markham Moor, Nottinghamshire. It is disused, but still standing. Not driven by there in a few years, so not sure if it still stands. I believe it is listed, so protected. geograph-1...4dddd4.jpg geograph-173949-by-richard-croft-64df3bd4dddd4.jpg

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#33

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
thomas_maertens avatar
Saint Thomas
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

It's the city hall of Stuttgart, wich was severly damaged during a WW2 bombing raid.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#34

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
aasmith1401 avatar
Adam S
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

To be fair WW2 and the wall destroyed a lot of old architecture…not saying what replaced it is amazing but the old stuff wasn’t necessarily demolished to make way for it

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu
#35

Culture-Critic-Pics

Culture_Crit Report

Add photo comments
POST
danmarshctr avatar
The Original Bruno
Community Member
8 months ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is one where I disagree. The new structure is not experimental brutalism, but a very practical attempt to make a pleasant indoor environment. Behind and to the left, you see an even more modern building which attempts to be beautiful while allowing for an all-glass exterior. I do find beauty in many modern architectural works; while Lloyd's is horrifying and Tate looks like it Pink Floyd's Wish You Were Here was exalting what it damned, the Shard and the Gherkin have their own beauty.

View More Replies...
View more commentsArrow down menu