“History Destroyed”: Chris Pratt And Katherine Schwarzenegger Spark Outrage With Estate Project
Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger recently found themselves in architecture enthusiasts’ crosshairs as a result of razing a historical midcentury modern home to allegedly build a new house across the street from Katherine’s mother.
Last year, Los Angeles Conservancy, a nonprofit membership organization that advocates for the preservation of historic architectural and cultural resources in the City of Angels, expressed their disappointment upon learning that the famous couple had plans to demolish a 1950 modernist residence at 400 North Carmelina Avenue in Brentwood.
- Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger were criticized for demolishing a historic 1950s LA house to build a new mansion.
- The demolished house was a notable example of Modernist design from the 1950s, identified as potentially historic.
- Los Angeles Conservancy expressed disappointment, suggesting alternatives to demolition and seeking historic protections.
In January 2023, the organization wrote that the property was designed by 1950s architect Emiel Becsky, who was working within influential modernist Craig Ellwood’s office.
“He created a one-story, nearly 3,000 sq. ft. residence that appears to be highly intact and a noteworthy example of Modernist design from this era,” the nonprofit explained at the time.
Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger sparked outrage for razing a midcentury modern home to build a new one near Katherine’s mom
Image credits: prattprattpratt
“The City’s SurveyLA program identified it as potentially historic, yet no protections are currently afforded,” they added.
The organization expressed its confusion regarding the motivation for the demolition, as the house was not for sale nor transferred out of longtime ownership at the time.
Los Angeles Conservancy went on to plea for “viable alternatives to demolition” and asked for help to make the property a certified Historic-Cultural Monument and further their appeal with Traci Park, an American attorney and politician, who is the Los Angeles City Councilmember.
Fast forward to this year, and The Guardians of the Galaxy star and Arnold Schwarzenegger’s daughter have seemingly gone ahead and demolished the cherished estate despite criticism.
Image credits: prattprattpratt
Located on one of Brentwood’s most prestigious streets, the so-called Zimmerman House was razed in a matter of days, The Robb Report reported earlier this month.
According to the luxury-lifestyle magazine, in the home’s place, a new and much larger mansion has been rising.
“Witnessing the demolition of revered residential architecture is a gut punch,” a staffer for midcentury modern homes enthusiast website The Eichler Network wrote.
“Even walking the inclined driveway leading to the empty lot where such a home once stood can be painful,” they added. “Such was the case last week, while in Los Angeles. Our emotions ran high.”
The 1950 modernist residence at 400 North Carmelina Avenue in Brentwood was known as the Zimmerman House
Image credits: laconservancy
The USModernist nonprofit explained that the Zimmerman House was commissioned in 1949 by Martin and Eva Zimmerman and completed in 1950.
Once featured in Progressive Architecture magazine, the 0.83-acre estate featured gardens and mature trees carefully placed by esteemed landscape designer Garrett Eckbo.
Inside, the blocky modernist structure offered five bedrooms and three bathrooms in 2,770 square feet of single-story living space.
The house changed hands in 1968 and again in 1975, when it sold for the paltry sum of $205,000 to Sam and Hilda Rolfe, the co-creator of the classic 1960s spy series The Man From U.N.C.L.E. and the CBS series Have Gun — Will Travel.
Image credits: J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles
Sam died in 1993, but his widow, Hilda, continued to own and reside at the property until her own death nearly 30 years later.
Although the Zimmerman house was never listed on the open market, the property was quietly sold last January, just months after Hilda’s death.
The property’s listing still appears on the American tech real-estate marketplace website Zillow, indicating it was sold for a total of $12,500,000.
“The off-market buyers were Hollywood actor Chris Pratt and author Katherine Schwarzenegger, who wasted little time in demolishing the midcentury structure to make way for their own new Brentwood dream home—which is currently still in the early stages of construction,” The Robb Report wrote.
The 0.83-acre estate featured gardens and mature trees carefully placed by esteemed landscape designer Garrett Eckbo
Image credits: J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles
Permit records indicated that the A-listers’ new house, which stands two stories tall and includes a full basement, was designed by architect Ken Ungar, one of the Westside’s most prolific and successful designers of large modern farmhouse-style mansions, the magazine reported.
The Pratt-Schwarzeneggers’ property will reportedly also feature a backyard swimming pool, plus a pool house or poolside cabana of some sort.
The couple’s property development sparked outrage on social media, as an X user (formerly known as Twitter) wrote: “Ok, now I get the hate for Chris Pratt. Why would you spend 12 million on this jewel only to demolish it!?”
Another person commented: “Oh my God… how do you demolish an architectural icon to build a standard yahoo McMansion.”
Image credits: J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles
Someone else penned: “Why didn’t they use their $$s to move the house to another location?
“Houses can B moved, even cut into pieces & reassembled.
“This was HISTORY Destroyed.”
An additional individual chimed in: “Still thinking about this—-I don’t know what would behoove someone to spend millions on a house just to raze it.”
The house was sold for $205,000 to Sam and Hilda Rolfe, the co-creator of the classic 1960s spy series The Man From U.N.C.L.E.
Image credits: J. Paul Getty Trust. Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles
“I’m sorry but the fact that LA is fighting celebrities for its life left & right to keep them from leveling historic houses in…. Brentwood if [sic] all places, is beyond me.”
Brentwood is one of Los Angeles’ coolest neighborhoods, home to countless movie and music stars, upscale shops, glossy office buildings, and plenty of outdoor entertainment options, as per Fancy Pants Homes.
“It used to be one of Hollywood’s best-kept secrets, but celebrities and celebrity scandals ultimately managed to put it under the spotlight,” the luxury home blog added.
Chris Pratt draws ire for razing historic 1950 LA home for sprawling mansion. Actor and wife Katherine Schwarzenegger dismantle 1950 Zimmerman house designed by architect #CraigEllwood https://t.co/ntnAmRN9uA #architecture pic.twitter.com/ZzZfdBvi9B
— MIX (@mixdevil66) April 20, 2024
In addition to backlash from people mourning the iconic midcentury house, the 44-year-old actor and his 34-year-old wife’s real estate project was further reproached, as previous reports highlighted that the Zimmerman house was located almost directly across the street from a two-house compound owned by Katherine’s mother, Maria Shriver.
Other nearby neighbors include Arianna Huffington and Sofia Richie, as per The Robb Report.
Bored Panda has contacted Chris and Katherine’s respective representatives as well as the Los Angeles Conservancy for comment.
“Money can’t buy taste,” a reader commented
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Move on folks, it’s totally normal for people with the money to buy the location and the current building is irrelevant, it’s ALL about the location. Chris Pratt is only doing what thousands before him have done. If you wish to preserve 1950s architecture then put your effort into getting them protected rather than getting bent out of shape over someone who can afford to make changes.
In the UK a property developer razed a centuries old pub, it was by accident of course, well those in charge of listed historical buildings were not impressed with the excuses. The developer had to rebuild the pub, brick by brick until it was back to how it was.
This house is younger than several of my friends. If these people want to preserve 70-year-old stuff, I know of a couple needed hip replacements they could help with.
Load More Replies...
Historic 50's-era house. So horrifically outdated, probably made with unsafe materials, too small. My house was built sometime around 1890-1920. Tiny, all electric and plumbing had to be added over the years. Not considered "historic" in any way. I guess if someone "special* built it? I love 50s-era design but that house was generic and nondescript. It looked like my old middle-scool.
She likes to be called Andy, it says that in her profile
Load More Replies...
I would assume more care was taken to build this house, and better-than-usual materials were used. 50s architecture is a thing, and its a shame if people don't appreciate it.
At the end of the day, he bought it. Unless the structure was protected under the Federal Preservation Act, he can do with it what he wants. Sad but true.
Living in CA, I've seen so much pearl clutching over this. It is an ugly house made of brick, concrete and glass. There were literally millions of houses like this all over California in horrible shape and ready to be demolished. Why? Because the majority of people find them to be ugly, uncomfortable, a bear to heat/cool, and impossible to maintain (flat roofs and glass blocks anyone?) Owners know there's no money in fixing something that people hate. Just because a FEW people enjoy them or an architect of minimal renown designed it doesn't mean it needs to be preserved. The guy designed an ugly house that now needs more work than its worth. It's justifiably been torn down by a new owner who doesn't value the same kind of architecture other people value. In 70 years, these same types will be clamoring to preserve decrepit modern farmhouses in the Valley because of "history".
The city or some other organization should have purchased the property if they wanted to protect it instead of complaining after the fact.
His money, his property, his house, his decision, no one other is entitled for opinion or to decide what he could and cound not do with his money, his property, and his house. Sure, me as an Architect i am sad he just destroyed someting architectuly significant, it used to be nice bulding, but under no protection, so not that much of significant, but, thats all i can do. Lets hope his new Galaxy mansion will be as nice as the previouse structure.
This is an ugly house from 1950s, it's not a national treasure. Build a nice house, on you go.
Historic 50's LA house! You Americans can really be funny sometimes, thanks for the laugh 😂
Historic is relative.. just as opinions. Every place obviously has not so bright people 👆🏻
Load More Replies... Move on folks, it’s totally normal for people with the money to buy the location and the current building is irrelevant, it’s ALL about the location. Chris Pratt is only doing what thousands before him have done. If you wish to preserve 1950s architecture then put your effort into getting them protected rather than getting bent out of shape over someone who can afford to make changes.
In the UK a property developer razed a centuries old pub, it was by accident of course, well those in charge of listed historical buildings were not impressed with the excuses. The developer had to rebuild the pub, brick by brick until it was back to how it was.
This house is younger than several of my friends. If these people want to preserve 70-year-old stuff, I know of a couple needed hip replacements they could help with.
Load More Replies... Historic 50's-era house. So horrifically outdated, probably made with unsafe materials, too small. My house was built sometime around 1890-1920. Tiny, all electric and plumbing had to be added over the years. Not considered "historic" in any way. I guess if someone "special* built it? I love 50s-era design but that house was generic and nondescript. It looked like my old middle-scool.
She likes to be called Andy, it says that in her profile
Load More Replies... I would assume more care was taken to build this house, and better-than-usual materials were used. 50s architecture is a thing, and its a shame if people don't appreciate it.
At the end of the day, he bought it. Unless the structure was protected under the Federal Preservation Act, he can do with it what he wants. Sad but true.
Living in CA, I've seen so much pearl clutching over this. It is an ugly house made of brick, concrete and glass. There were literally millions of houses like this all over California in horrible shape and ready to be demolished. Why? Because the majority of people find them to be ugly, uncomfortable, a bear to heat/cool, and impossible to maintain (flat roofs and glass blocks anyone?) Owners know there's no money in fixing something that people hate. Just because a FEW people enjoy them or an architect of minimal renown designed it doesn't mean it needs to be preserved. The guy designed an ugly house that now needs more work than its worth. It's justifiably been torn down by a new owner who doesn't value the same kind of architecture other people value. In 70 years, these same types will be clamoring to preserve decrepit modern farmhouses in the Valley because of "history".
The city or some other organization should have purchased the property if they wanted to protect it instead of complaining after the fact.
His money, his property, his house, his decision, no one other is entitled for opinion or to decide what he could and cound not do with his money, his property, and his house. Sure, me as an Architect i am sad he just destroyed someting architectuly significant, it used to be nice bulding, but under no protection, so not that much of significant, but, thats all i can do. Lets hope his new Galaxy mansion will be as nice as the previouse structure.
This is an ugly house from 1950s, it's not a national treasure. Build a nice house, on you go.
Historic 50's LA house! You Americans can really be funny sometimes, thanks for the laugh 😂
Historic is relative.. just as opinions. Every place obviously has not so bright people 👆🏻
Load More Replies...
-8
21