30 ‘Useless Yet Interesting Calculations’ To Get Your Mind Reeling (New Posts)
Interview With OwnerMathematics as a concept—not even a discipline, though that too—is one of those things that is both science but also magic at the same time.
Science, because, d’uh, but magic because just look at the kind of mind-boggling shenanigans you can get into by simply assuming that one divided by three is one third, and one third is 0.(3) and times 3 it’s 0.(9). Who Houdinied that extra 0.(1) away?!
But outside the wonder that this scientific “logic” provides, it’s pretty much useless. And you bet there’s a dedicated community around useless math online—well, useless, but interesting.
This post may include affiliate links.
One 9 Inch Pizza vs. Two 5 Inch Pizzas
I would be more concerned that they are not making the pizzas/dough fresh if a certain size was not available.
There are a ton of great pizza places in NYC that make their dough fresh. When it runs out, they close for the day.
Load More Replies...Even if this owner never learned any maths in his life, never heard of Pi, it’s completely obvious when you look at the quantity of ingredients. He wasn’t « speechless » because it never occurred.
cant tell if this is a "and then everyone clapped and i own the company now" or a "huh. maybe math isnt useless" moment (math is important, but not when your teaching me that John has 1,064 siblings)
If the Radius is Z, then the Area of the ciricle is calculated by: Pi * Z * Z = A
The radius is always r, but I'll upvote you anyway.
Load More Replies...MIT hosted NASA's Annual Conference on Manual Control in 1982. Several of the people attending had dinner in a restaurant near the campus. They discussed one of the papers over dinner. The waiter overheard part of this and asked some questions. The diners tried to explain things as simply as possible. The waiter said it sounded like what we were trying to say was something like this, then he picked up a paper napkin and started writing equations. The owner later explained that he had wanted to be an engineer, but could not afford it. Now that he had money, he only hired graduate students.
How Tall Would This Tree Have Been, And How Visible Would It Have Been?
"So the ave stump height is cut to 0.45 m. Let's assume an oak, with an ave height of 20m. Thats about 2.3% of overall height.
This tree would therefore be around 11.7km high using that ratio. Almost high enough to tickle the stratosphere at 12km
So if I used the horizon calculator right, you could still see the bastard 387km away
EDIT: Just to answer a few of the many questions. In American that'd be about 7.3miles, or 13,760 washing machines"
Round two of the measurement wars:- imperial washing machines vs metric bananas. Yaay!
65730.337079 bananas high. https://www.converttobananas.com/
Load More Replies...Now that you brought it up, Devil's Tower DOES look like a stump. Sadly, it isn't petrified wood. Basalt core of long extinct volcano.
Thank you for the edit, as an American I was very confused and looking for a banana
A Natural Headache Cure
Plus you would probably be dead from cyanide poisoning before you finished eating them
Maybe a bit drastic, but it definitely gets rid of the headache, I guess? Also very effective for preventing another headache...
Load More Replies...how can the molecular weight of salicyclic acide be dependent on the source of the stuff? If it is the same stuff, shouldn't it weight the same?
So, there’s a community on Reddit called r/TheyDidTheMath, which captions itself as “useless, yet interesting calculations.” The description smugly points out “and they said math has no real world applications.”
The subreddit is ranked in the top 1% on the platform and boasts 1.4 million members.
What Does His Shirt Say
"The quote is "I'm sexy and I know it"
sqrt(1+tan^2) can be verbalized as "sec" and so this formula is the "sec of c"
"I'm sec C and I know it""
It looks like Titanic to me, and assumed he is going to sink somewhere, and badly.
it's a trig identity. 1+tan^2(c) is equal to sec^2(c). the square root of that is just sec(c) (sexy)
Load More Replies...Is This True?
"They’re called crinkle crankles. A single leaf wall over that distance would need brick piers approx every 1.5-2m if it was a retaining wall it would need to be at least 9” wide (2 bricks). The crinkle crankle has more strength due to it’s curved nature so can be 4” wide or a single leaf of bricks.
For the maths if we can assume they’re true semi-circles then each semi circle would be 1/2piD or 1.57D whereas a double leaf wall would be 2D for the same length D
Therefore using 21.5% less bricks than a double leaf wall"
The actual reason has nothing to do with the quantity of bricks needed. It’s a matter of foundation and ground stability. A straight wall requires (a lot) more work to prepare the ground. With adapted buttresses it would require less bricks and be more stable. But it would be longer and more expensive to build. These corrugated walls were just.. the cheap option.
They are obviously not semicircles though. They look more like a sine wave. So according to some calculations I found, the length of a sine wave from 0 to 2pi is about 7.64 So a two layer wall would be 4pi=12.57 So you can save almost 40% of bricks using a sine wave.
If only the East German »brick in the wall« mathematicians had thought of this in the early 1960s, nobody would have had to complain about building materials being difficult to obtain...🧱🕵🏽🤷🏽
David, to get a straight wall with equal strength, you can't build it single leaf. So if you just want a visible, temporary wall you can build it single leaf and save on bricks and time for sure. If you want a strong, durable wall, this is the cheapest option. Requires less bricks and less foundation work.
Load More Replies...Approximately How Large Would The Car Have To Be In Order To Be That Curved?
"Quick eyeballing suggests a curvature of about 30°; that's 1/12th of a full circle, so given that the Earth's circumference is just over 40,000 km, the car would have to be about 3333 km long, or about the driving distance from Chicago to Los Angeles, or about 5.5 million washing machines (in case you're too American to understand kilometers)."
My mathematical question is this: If you believe the world is flat, how do you have enough brain power to talk and think at the same time?
1. They don't think, at least in the conventional sense. 2. It takes no brain power to say stuff as stupid as the things they say.
Load More Replies......or the Earth would be about12 car's long on circumference, or a little under four cars in diameter. If it was indeed that small, I think it would be rather easy to settle the debate about its shape (though it shouldn't be that hard as it is, but apparently some people are a special combination of stupid and stubborn)
I was thinking something similar. If the curve of the earth was concentric with the picture of that car the earth would be very small indeed.
Load More Replies...A flat earther would not accept this argument in bananas because bananas are curved like the car in the lower picture.
Load More Replies...Just when I get use to bananas someone has to throw washing machines into the mix.
A picture is worth 1000 words or 17 math equations, but I put it at about 43º, so: 40,000km / 360º * 43º = 4,777.78 km, and that's for just the wheelbase. Let's call the car 5,500 km long. That's about 8,019,000 US standard 27" washing machines. Untitled-6...b56a94.jpg
...because only »flatties« would even dare to drive »around« in such a 🐂 💩...
You can say the subreddit deals in very situational and contextual math where you’d probably only be able to use it in very niche cosmological occasions.
Like calculating the amount of toilet paper you’d need for 14 days of quarantine. Or what all the humans as fine goo would look like in Central Park. Or the number of small pizzas you’d need to substitute a large pizza. OK, that last one sounds useful.
How Much Does This Kitten Weigh?
"One source says the “minimum actuation force” of a key is 47.6 grams. If we assume the kitten is standing on 4 keys (only one per paw) 4*47.6 is 190.4 grams or 0.4 pounds. Ao the kitten would be under that weight. It appears that the kitten is standing on more than 4 keys though so maybe 1/2 pound."
Minimal actuation force is exactly that, a minimum, to ensure keys are not too easily pressed. The actual average force needed is way higher. And increases with time because of dirt, dust, crumbs..
It looks as if the little kitten is standing on about three to four keys per paw on the keyboard...🙋🏽 🐾 ⌨️ 🐾
Bouche likes to sleep on my phone, because it's warm. Unfortunately, I'm usually trying to use the phone at the time. To be honest, she almost always wins.
With that sweet face, that little floof ball can walk anywhere they want.
It doesn't matter. With that sweet face this fluff ball can walk anywhere they want.
Really Though, How Much Different Exactly?
"$9.33 on the left and $21.51 on the right"
But cost is one reason why folks w/little money fill up on junk foods
Load More Replies...They're weird comparisons because the one on the left is a meal on the go, and the one on the right most definitely is not. Not a practical or useful picture.
One also includes a beverage, while the other does not.
Load More Replies...I'd rather pay $21,51 for actual food than save money and feel empty all day
I have to have the groceries delivered. The shopper puts them on the front porch. My kitchen is the farthest room from the front door. It takes four or five trips, even piling stuff on my walker, to get it to the kitchen. By then, I can barely move. I don't have the strength or stamina to prep food, cook it, box up the leftovers, and wash the dishes. Plus, there's serious food trash that will bring flies. I don't pay $7 for fake coffee. I buy instant. Otherwise, I'm definitely the person on the left, although I would love to eat good, healthy food.
Both undervalued. Assuming someone got this at convenience store it would be at least $16, and on the right, just a pint of good blueberries currently goes for about $7! I can't even comprehend how expensive the right side is. That's why singles & couples buy so much takeout--they can't recreate it for the price!
Blueberries in the US are wicked expensive right now for some supply chain reason. That aside, if a person living alone bought all the food on the right, a lot of it would probably go bad before it could be eaten. We can't all afford a separate freezer.
Load More Replies...And now one with the fruits and vegs of the season. Less than $9. Buy the stuff on the right when it is the season of the respective vegetable and fruit and buy those your local farmers grow. These are cheap as hell. Buy when cheap and prepare it, freeze it or whatever to make it last. This is why jam was invented the first place, preserve fruit so you can have some in winter. Salmon and avocado are treats for special occasions for most people. Nutrition is more than energy, it is vitamins, minerals and fibre, which keep you healthy and fit and save you money for the doctor.
This assumes one has access to a kitchen, particularly one with a freezer or storage space, and have access to and can afford fresh fruit in the first place. If you are poor or unhoused, none of that is necessarily true.
Load More Replies...I can't afford, and don't have time to make, the meal on the right...
No, 1600 calories is 1600 calories. That's only enough for one person on a calorie deficit diet for one day regardless of the contents of the meal.
Load More Replies...The one on the right makes more meals. About six, which works out to 1.50 per meal.
How Many Combinations Of 9 Ingredients Are Possible. Using All 9 At Once Is Not Required
"Each ingredient can either be included or not -- that's 2 possibilities. Multiply out all 9 ingredients and we have 29 = 512 in total. I presume you'd want to exclude the 1 possibility where none of the ingredients are included, so that leaves 511."
It's the same thing in theory with particle physics: only 26 (not sure, maybe more) subatomic elements governed by 4 forces would constitute absolutely all the matter, living or not, in the known universe.
Well, you're also considering symmetry (eg taking the eight gluons, eight because SU3 symmetry, as one). Also, SUSY is potential (but probably false?).
Load More Replies...But the way the ingredients are prepared is another factor for several of them. Do you want the shell to be fried, deep fried, or soft? Shape is also a factor (ie taco or burrito). Way more than 511 possibilities!
Actually, seeing it's Taco Bell, that combination with none of those ingredients would be my top (and only) choice.
Some people don't know how to type superscript, like 2⁹ (on the Google Android keyboard, aka Gboard, just long-press the number key you want to generate a superscript).
Load More Replies...and they still had the audacity to stop serving the 7-layer burrito!!!
Good example of oversimplification in a problem. They are not 9 independent equal ingredients. It’s more like choose 1 out of 2 types of bread, then 1 out of 3 types of meat, then..
The way it is presented is accurate if each ingredient is only used once. Inclusion or exclusion of said ingredient can be defined as excluded, 0, or included, 1. Treat it like a 9 digit binary number and every combination of ingredients can be included in that 9bits. There are 512 possibilities in a 9 bit number, if you remove 0 this means 511. It isn't commenting on how many combinations make sense, just how many are possible
Load More Replies...Bored Panda has reached out to the founder of the subreddit, r/FragTheWhale, who was more than happy to tell us more about r/TheyDidTheMath.
"I was a part of the tool subreddit, r/toolband, and someone had made an actual calculated, in-depth analysis of a Tool lyric 'slide a mile six inches at a time on Maynard's [ding-dong]' and what length of time it would take," elaborated Frag. "Loved the idea so much, I created a subreddit for it with 1.54 million subs!"
Is This True And If Yes How Deos It Work?
"Quite the opposite, it will leave you with less sandwich. Since no cut is perfect, some of the sandwich molecules will stay on the knife or there is more crumbs on the cutting board. Therefore, cutting on a diagonal (longest cut) will dislodge more material of the sandwich than cutting along shorter line"
But you can't deny that diagonal cut = better tasting sandwich
Cutting a sandwich at all ruins the best part. A sandwich should be eaten from the outside inward, with the final bite being the very center of the sandwich (the "filet"). 🤷🏼♂️
Load More Replies...The geometry doesn't take into consideration that triangles taste better.
I eat my sandwiches without cutting them. Just dive right in through the bread, like a monster.
ok but with a diagonal cut you get more bites without crust, so it is a more enjoyable experience
With the vertical cut, all bites are about the same size and shape (squarish), With a diagonal cut, some bites will have less sandwich than the squarish ones - the corner ones for example. Less sandwich per some bites means more bites required. Therefore the illusion of more sandwich.
How Much Would This Actually Cost?
"Return flight JFK - Madrid: ~€750 Minimum income in Spain: €850/mo; 24 months amount to €20400. We'll assume that since a lot of people in Spain have to make do with this much, you will figure it out too. Learning Spanish is pretty straightforward, if you live in Spain for 2 years, you're practically guaranteed to pick up enough of it to get by, but let's say you spend €100 on a couple textbooks and a dictionary, just to get you started. Depending on where in the US you live, there might even be a solid chance that you already speak the language, after all it's the country's second language, with more speakers in the US than in Spain. You will also be spending a bit on visas and other bureaucratic requirements, let's call that another €200. Running with the bulls and getting trampled can be had for free. And then there's the hip replacement itself, at $7,371, or €7074. However, depending how you play it, you could actually take a minimum-wage job in Spain, and qualify for public healthcare, in which case the hip replacement might actually be covered. But let's just assume you have to pay for it out of pocket (which, frankly, is a pretty unusual thing in Europe, and typically only happens when people have to get treatement abroad and the insurance situation hasn't been figured out, or for a couple religious weirdos who object against having health insurance on moral grounds).
So let's ring you up; grand total: €28524, that's about $29700.
Not only does it fit comfortably into the US figure, you even have some $12,000 to spare"
How much do you pay for insurance? The average US worker doesn't have good insurance provided by work and definitely not for free. I have the best insurance of most of my friends with $2400 in premiums, then it covers mostly nothing (other than getting the insurance negotiated rate) until I've paid $5000. I work for a huge company in a professional field (i.e.,this is considered a good job), and this is competitive in this market. After $5000, I still have 20% coinsurance and a max out of pocket of $12000. So all in, my "good" insurance would mean I pay $14400. It's not great but it's doable. If I'm referred to a specialist not covered by my insurance or they decide to deny my claim? I'm on the hook for all of it! I had surgery this year ($27,000 insurance negotiated rate) and they wouldn't even confirm my insurance would cover it before it took place. I don't doubt you have the insurance you say, but that's not good insurance that's INCREDIBLE and not at accessible for most.
Load More Replies...I've known someone to fly from Australia to Brazil for surgery and a holiday. And save money doing it. Average hip replacement cost in Australia is $20,000 to $25,000 Australian dollars (about 75 UD cents to the Australian dollar) or free if your insurance covers it.
I didn’t have my hip replaced, but had my knee replaced. Cost? Zilch. Zero. Nothing. Oh yes I live the UK.
What Is A Penguins Slapping Power?
"The average emperor penguin slaps with about the same force as a middleweight boxer. 800-1000 PSI"
I would MUCH rather be slapped by an emperor penguin than by a middleweight boxer, however.
I bet you would rather not be bit by a penguin tho. Look up the inside of a penguin beak
Load More Replies...I wonder things like that as well..just wish my brain could do things like the above explanation instead
Despite the tagline "useless math", the subreddit actually serves an important educational function.
"I think it can serve an educational purpose! Especially in terms of shifting perspectives or addressing myths (something about too many bananas are bad for you? Turns out, you'd have to eat like 4,000 bananas in a day to overdose on potassium, something like that). Initially, people kinda used it as a tool to get others to do their math homework for them."
I’ve Always Wondered How Much Money Walt Actually Had
"Assuming those are $100 bill stacks at $10,000 each. I count 12 stacks across and 15 stacks deep and assuming that each stack is ~0.5 inches tall with a total height of ~30 inches.
12 * 15 * (30 / 0.5) * 10,000 = $108 Million dollars."
The problem was they weren't all the same denomination. That's why Skyler couldn't count it and couldn't calculate it. She did say she tried weighing it, but again all different denominations
Do random sampling and find the mean. Use that to make assumptions and then calculate
Load More Replies...A Lot Of Paper, But How Much
"36,567,729 sheets of letter sized paper according to Excel (single sided)
According to Google a pallet contains 200,000 sheets
Therefore 182 pallets of paper would be needed.
A photocopier can apparently print 500,000 sheets in its lifetime, so you would need 73 photocopiers"
And they will curse themselves that they didn't do Print Preview first
If the person doesn't cancel the print job, they could just keep feeding the same blank pages of paper through the printer again and again. Edit: Since the printer isn't actually printing anything on the pages, the printing of the "500,000 sheets" is inconsequential.
Inconsequential in ink costs anyway. I would guess that the paper would wear down eventually from repeated runs through the machinery. And the cost of replacing the printers. But yes, cancelling the print job seems the best approach 😆
Load More Replies...It will only eat a ream of paper because that is the maximum loadout of one office copier paper tray (assuming you don't have some sort of special high-capacity tray, or a copier which can auto-rotate to accommodate paper in a different tray, etc).
After finishing the first ream the printer will wait patiently for the next ream to be installed. And so on. You can reuse the same ream over and over, but you'll still need to install it.
Load More Replies...The natural habitat of the bottom roght corner can be found somewhere in the bottom right corner...🙋🏽↘️🕵🏽
...and cue the revence for the person who was unrightfully firered from a company.
How Many Rocks Would This Person Have To Throw To Flood Denmark?
"The total area of ocean is about 361 million square km, or 3.61 x 1014 square meters.
The highest point of Denmark is about 171m.
The earth is large enough that we can choose to ignore the curvature over a change of radius of 171m (compared to the radius of 6300km it’s less than a rounding error).
What we can’t ignore is that there is about 30 million square km of land that is 171m or less above sea level which will also be flooded (estimating from a hypsographic curve). I’ll factor in a mean of half of that to give the new earths surface figure of 3.76 x 1014 square meters.
This means that there would need to be 171 x 3.76 x 1014 = 6.43 x 1016 cubic meters of water displaced.
If we assume a good throwing rock has a volume of 1 litre, then you would need 6.43 x 1019 rocks.
At 1 rock per day that’s going to be 1.76 x 1017 years, or 12 900 000 times the age of the universe.
If all 8 billion people on the world threw one rock per second, it would only take 250 years"
Turns out it's the drive to the beach that does it
Load More Replies...You've almost got it figured out. You start by throwing rocks from the highest point in Denmark. That lowers the elevation, and *significantly* reduces how much sea level rise is necessary. Look for my other reply to see how significantly.
Load More Replies...Footnote. For 1017 read 10^17. For 1019 read 10^19. For 1016 read 10^16 etc.
Yeah, idk why BP can't figure out that formatting. It's frustrating
Load More Replies...That's wildly wrong. Raising sea level by 1 meter would require 360,000 trillion cubic liters of rock. Denmark has a land area of about 43 billion square meters, and an average elevation of 34 meters. That means Denmark has a total volume of 1,462 trillion cubic liters. You can't fit the world's population in Denmark, but you can fit Denmark's population of 5.857 million people. If they each throw one rock from Denmark every second, all of Denmark will be covered by the ocean in 7.9 years. That also benefits the rest of the world, because it only raises sea level by 4 mm.
When asked what the community is like, OP explained that it's hard to say for sure as they have taken a step back from Reddit as a whole. But, the community seems to thrive all the same, and, over the years, Frag noticed that there are essentially two camps of people: the crowd that's all about silly humor in math, and the crowd that's all about hardcore science and analytics.
It goes without saying that it is very entertaining to see people take silly discussions both seriously and scientifically.
How Many Nickels Would It Take To Crush You?
"According to a google search, it takes about 4,000 newtons to crush a bone, & I’m going to assume that an average person has a frontal surface area of 1 m2 for ease.
A nickel weighs 5 grams, which equates to about 0.05 newtons of gravitational force… you’d need at least 81,578 nickels on top of the person, or about $4,078.90"
OK. I'll let you get away with this. But there are a lot of other factors like which part of you is crushed and how are the nickels held in place.
What Are The Odds?
"Beginner: 1 in 102 million
Intermediate: 1 in 6.1 million
Expert: 1 in 477,000"
That may be wrong, because Minesweeper is set up so that you can't hit a mine on the first hit. If you initially choose where a mine is then the algorithm moves the mine. So it's p^8 rather than (1-p)p^8. I don't know if they've taken that into account.
None or those alternative values relate to this case. This is neither Beginner, intermediate or expert: it is Custom. iirc, the windows implementation of minesweeper allows (or used to allow, this pic is old) you to not only set a Custom field size, but to customize the number of mines. Although we can see the field size, we cannot know the probability of any given square being mined without knowing both values, so we have insufficient data to calculate the odds of this happening. It should be noted that if the person who took this screen grab had set the number of mines to the highest possible, the odds would become rather good, and they could get this screen grab quite easily with a few tries. But why would someone do that just to post it on the internet. No-one would do that, right?
How Much Would This Cool The Tea?
"Oh come on this is doable from an engineering point of view:
One sip per second of 10ml (a shot glas' equivalent in a few seconds)
90°C tea, 0°C water (I see ice?), ∆T =90
Conduction in the thin straw is negligible, basically water-to-water heat transfer at a slow rate: the convection coëfficiënt for that is about 1000W/m²K (forced convection water to unforced water essentially)
Straw is 5mm diameter, 150mm length is submerged. Total area = 5π*150 = 2350mm² heat exchange area.
As such, the heat (power) transferred per second is = 9010002350/1e6 ≈ 211W
211W for 0.01kg water (tea) per second is ∆T = 211/4200/0.01 ≠ 5°C difference.
This matches my experience: the straw is simply not big enough to offer proper area for heat exchange:
Source: 10 years of steam boiler engineering
Hope you enjoyed!"
what if the entire submerged part of the straw was all "bendy" part, and that acted as radiator fins? Would that make a significant difference?
Doesn't address the biggest issue, surface area. That plastic is thin enough that the advantage in conduction over that small an area is likely negligible
Load More Replies...Or just be patient. Or stirring the tea, bringing tea at the bottom of the cup to the surface allows the heat in the tea to escape more easily.
but a shot glass if not 10ml; an average shot glass is 1 TBSP which is equal to 15ml, but most shot glasses hold 2oz which would be equivalent to 2 TBSP or 30 ml.
An average shot glass is 1.5 oz which is 3 Tbsp or ~44mL, the measurement is called a jigger. Many shot glasses can hold 3 oz or 6 Tbsp or ~89mL
Load More Replies...When asked about any favorite posts on the subreddit, the founder noted that it's hard to pick out a favorite. Whenever they pop on to the subreddit, it feels like everyone is still staying true to what the subreddit originally was and stood for nearly a decade back.
How Fast Would You Need To Go To Successfully Complete The Loop?
"Im gonna assume the loop is about 60m based on the height of the building next to it.
At the top of the circle, the two forces are mg and centripetal force. The two together equal ma (a being v2/r.) So mg + Fc = m(v2/r). Set Fc to 0 as you would have to have a centripetal force slightly above 0 to complete the loop. This gives us v2 = sqrt(gr). For a 60m loop (30m radius) v = 17.1m/s.
This is the speed at the TOP of the loop. Using conservation of energy, we can say that 1/2mv2 + mgh = 1/2mv2 (the first part is top of loop, second part is bottom of loop). Cancel m and plug in numbers.
You would have to travel 38.34m/s or 138kph (85.7mph) to make the loop."
Just check first that there is no misplaced decimal point.
Load More Replies...lol there is some huge lack of critical thinking there.. At 138km/h a car wouldn’t even reach the first quarter of the loop.
The formulae are correct based on what I can find, and the math checks out. However physics isn't my strong suit, what other factors aren't being accounted for that would slow the vehicle faster than what's shown?
Load More Replies...I try to drive this regularly in my dreams. Have’t had any success yet.
If The Sun Turned Into A Black Hole Of Equivalent Mass, Would The Accretion Disk Disk Be Large Enough To Destroy The Earth? If Not, How Bright Would It Be?
"NASA did the math on this
"If the Sun was replaced with a black hole that had the same mass as the Sun, the Schwarzschild radius would be 3 km (compared to the Sun's radius of nearly 700,000 km). Hence the Earth would have to get very close to get sucked into a black hole at the center of our Solar System.""
In other words, there wouldn't be an accretion disk, because the scenario of replacing the Sun by a black hole doesn't require one. However the only way in practice for the Sun to become a black hole would be for it to swallow a small one. An extra calculation would be required to calculate both how long it would take the Sun to collapse into a black hole after swallowing a small black hole. And what the effect of conservation of angular omentum has on the presence or absence of an accretion disk because the Sun's spin angular momentum is conserved which may not be possible with a Kerr black hole alone.
This. The masses and distance remain unchanged, so the gravitational forces on all bodies in the solar system stays the same.
Load More Replies...A black hole with the same mass as the sun would be much smaller in diameter. The image shows a black hole presumably with the diameter of the sun, which would have a much greater mass. In other words the word problem & the picture don't match.
For any black hole, the mass of the black hole is the same as the mass of the star that it came from.
AFAIK, the mass of the black hole is the same as the mass of the remnant core of a star that already went supernova, blowing up most of its original mass into space.
Load More Replies...Which would be irrelevant to us, because: no sun = no light = no life on earth
»If The Sun Sun Turned Into A Black Hole Hole Of Equivalent Mass Mass, Would The Accretion Disk Disk Be Large Large Enough To To Destroy The Earth Earth? If Not Not, How Bright Bright Would It Be Be?«
How Much Would This Cost In That Time?
"He's a corporate executive of some sort and the trip was being paid for by the family member in Paris. His wife was also a fairly successful artist.
A 800k house in Bay Area probably cost >5M today"
Bay Area prices? Who cares? That’s not where the house is located. FYI the actual house was sold for 1.5M in 2012 and is now estimated to be worth 2.3M (2022).
Yeah, if they're going to compare prices & costs & house value, they need to use the correct area. In the movie, it was a fictional suburb of Chicago. Same town as Ferris Bueller, 16 Candles, etc.
Load More Replies...That's just the story given. He's really the younger brother of General McAllister in "Lethal Weapon," so after Riggs and Murtaugh took out his big bro, he gained access to Shadow Company heroin money that had been secreted away. (I am very proud of my one and only fan theory!)
I read an interview with some people who created the movies and they said that both parents made good money but the mom earned more! The mom was a very successful fashion designer and the dad had a top position in an accountancy firm. I distinctly remember them talking about how annoying they found it that everyone always asks 'what does the dad do to afford that house' it's incredibly sexist how everyone attributes the family's financial success to the father, especially when the creators always saw the mom as the more financially successful.
so the relatives paid for them to come to Paris, but not once do we see them contact said relatives to say "we forgot Kevin".... no wonder in Home Alone 2 they go to Miami.
"I have basically never had a hand in moderating," elaborated the creator of the subreddit. "But for the first 5 or so mods I took on, I did encourage them to really just let the community sort out what they did or didn't want to be content. And especially after the first big influx of subs, straight from the get-go, I think the community understood what they wanted out of it, what they didn't, and the content reflected that."
As It Asks, Which One Is The Better Deal?
"A circle has 360 degrees, so 60/360 is 1/6th of a pizza, and 45/360 is 1/8.
The area of a circle is (pi)r2
The area of the 6" pizza is 1/6(pi)(62 )=6(pi)
The area of the 7" pizza is 1/8(pi)(72 )=6.125(pi)
6.125/6=1.021, so the 7" pizza is 2.1% bigger
$1.70/$1.50 is 1.13, or 13% more expensive.
The 7" pizza is 13% more expensive, but only 2.1% bigger, so the 6" pizza is a better deal."
7" 8.5 peps 6" 7.5 peps, so 20c for 1 pep? 6" still better deal, maybe more so
Load More Replies...6 square is 36, not 62. 7 square is 49, not 72. 36/49*1.13 is 0.83. The 7 inch pizza is 17% cheaper.
It's supposed to be 6^2. For some reason none of these gets the exponentiation formatted correctly. There's minor rounding but the math is correct. You forgot to account for the pieces being 1/6th and 1/8th of the total area, and then thought that 17 is 17% 0f 83.
Load More Replies...The better deal is only partially portion based. I would prefer to have a more expensive piece of pizza and it taste better.
Taste is subjective, all things being equal, the 6" is still a better deal
Load More Replies...20 cents for one extra pepperoni? Scandalous, we're talking better deal
Load More Replies...How Much Force Is Superman’s Key Putting Down And Shouldn’t It Have Its Own Gravitational Pull?
"500,000 tons is its downward force due to gravity. It has a gravitational pull, but minimal compared to the earth (6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 tons)"
however, I doubt the concrete could have supported that mass over such a small area.
And following that logic, a single person holding it would also be pulled through the concrete unless said person was actively "flying" just enough to offset that pull.
Load More Replies...Well the gravitational pull does not only depend on weight of something, but also how close you are to it (The formula is F = G*m1*m2/r^2). Plug in Earth's mass and radius and you get the familiar 9.82N/kg. As that key is rather small, you can go a lot closer to it than you can to the center of the Earth, without being inside it. So assuming that you can get as close as 2cm from it, the gravitational pull would be 83N/kg (more than 8 times that of the Earth). So yes it would have its own gravitational pull, that can exceed that from the earth and hence things that are close to it would "fall up" towards it.
Is It True?
"If only contacting the floor with the heel then yes.
An elephant's foot is 15-19 inches across, so assuming it's vaguely circular gives an area of at least 0.114m2 per foot. Elephants when walking depending on the gait will have 2/3 feet in contact with the floor - so that's at least 0.228m2 in contact with the floor. (Going for minimum area as this will give the highest pressure for the comparison)
6000lbs under Earth's gravity is a force of 26.7kN, which when divided by area for a pressure of ~117kPa - if it's just standing still this could actually be halved to approx 58kPa
If a 100lb woman (445N) is standing on only her heels (~1cm2 x 2) this is a pressure of 2,224kPa which is indeed about 20 times higher than the elephant on 2 feet.
However that's not really representative of how heels are worn, even the picture shown has the shoes in contact with at least 20x the area of the ground than just the heels"
Except when walking there may well be a point at which the full weight is on the heel only.
That's not how walking works... The only time that only the heel is touching the ground is when the leading foot touches down, and at that point there is very little weight on it.
Load More Replies...Wait! What kind of shoes does that elephant have on? (Not crocs, surely.)
Is anyone else seeing the temu ad over and over again? Just seen it for the 5th or 6th time and realized it's NOT a wrought iron thong
Flash back. This was actually a question on a physics exam in high school (to calculate the pressure of an elephants foot vs a stiletto heel).
I think this is from Terry Pratchett and he wrote it as a joke so don't take it too seriously.
Even if you don’t take math seriously, you can still have some fun with it. Introducing the Useless Calculator. It’s essentially a prank app that bamboozles and confuses folks with its chaos by scrambling all the number keys, sporadic jump-scares, creepy sounds, flashy images, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it also got the math part wrong too where 2 plus 2 is my left shoe on the moon. Or whatever.
Is This Claim Actually Accurate?
"Yes, a 33 round single elimination bracket would have 233 participants, which is about 8.5 billion. So it is actually possible, since the world pop is probably just under 8 billion, that the winner would be someone who had the 1st round bye and only had to win 32 times"
People always underestimate how big numbers get when you double them. As anyone who did the old "grain of rice/coin on a chess board" problem can attest.
If you could go back in time to the year 0 - and you had quarter: You have two choices: Let the bank give you 3 % interest every year or let the quarter "grow" in a stack with the speed of the light for 2023 years (300,000 km/s and a quarter is 1.7526 mm thick) What will give you most when you're back to 2023?
Load More Replies...If each person in the world competed 1 on 1 with another person.
Load More Replies...What Are The Actual Odds Of Winning 32 Hands Of Blackjack In A Row?
"I believe blackjack gives the house a 0.61% edge over the player on average when played absolutely perfectly. Assuming the same odds for every game, .493932 leads me to a .000000000157% chance of winning 32 games in a row."
Some people have less self-control than others, so please don't use "blackjack" and "Elon Musk" in the same sentence.
The probability of a player winning a random hand of blackjack is .4222. The chance of winning 32 random hands in a row is 1 in 962,535,315,798 and it doesn't matter whether you do it playing 32 consecutive hands in half an hour or 1 hand every day for 32 days.
Trick is, they'd have to let you sit there and watch decks being dealt waiting for the advantage bet.
Load More Replies...The coming back a day later trick allows a chance of about 1 in 2 billion of 31 successes after the first success. Approximately.
How Large Would This Bat Need To Be To Fit The Signatures Of Everyone Alive?
"Rough estimate: 8 *109 people , Assuming a 10 cm2 signature/person to make the numbers easy. This comes from a 10cm long signature 1 cm in width.
Gives 8*1010 cm2 = 8*106 m2 in area. If we model the bat as a cylinder of length L, the surface area is SA = 2 pi r2 + 2 pi r *L, so if the bat has a length of 1 meter to fit in our hand, the second term is negligible, as r will be huge.
So A / 2pi = A/6 ~ 1 *106 m2 , square root to get the radius,
R = 1 * 103 m = 1 km
So if the bat is a meter long, it would have to be around a kilometer in radius to fit everyone’s signatures."
A metre long and a kilometre in radius....and will not look like a bat.
But, in all seriousness, math isn’t going away any time soon. We need it to make sense of the world: we need to know how fast we’re going on the highway; we need to know how many calories we take in (or not); we need math to pass our SATs; heck, we need to make sense of how many bottles of dish soap Tim has and how many he gives away to understand just how ridiculous Tim is.
Math matters, no matter its form.
How Fast Could The London Eye Spin Like A Fan Before It Breaks?
"Each pod is capable of holding 25 people at maximum safe capacity. Assuming each person can reasonably be 100kg, that means the safe load placed on any one pod is 2500kg.
The pods themselves weigh 10,000kg. The radius of the London eye is 67.5m.
Since at the bottom apex of the rotation the total force from centrifugal/centripetal force is equivalent to weight, a centrifugal force equal to 2500x9.81=24,525N is the maximum safe level.
F=MV2/R
V=sqrt(FR/M)
V=sqrt(24525x67.5/10,000)
V=12.9m/s
The pods could travel at approximately 28mph, or complete one rotation every 33 seconds, before the forces on the pods exceed safe levels. Theoretical maximum levels would be higher, but without stress testing the material cannot be precisely calculated."
It takes 45 minutes for one rotation. I remember someone getting confused and saying it span at 45 revolutions per minute. I wouldn't like to be in it at the time.
If it got loose you'd end up in Wales or the Irish Sea.
Load More Replies...Did They Get Her Height Right?
"Counter tops are usually 34 to 36in.
It was 5 phones to the top of counter 5.75"*5=28.75"
So I think they are off by a factor of 1.18 (34/28.75)
That would put her height around 5ft1in."
I was just thinking she's probably taller because they didn't resize the phone to account for it being probably a foot in front of the woman
Load More Replies...they didn't account for the slouch/lean in of the pose, also legs are in a recline position which is not as tall were she posed as standing at attention
How Tall Is The Building For The Dog To Grow This Much In One Ride?
"Slow apartment sized elevators (which this looks like) go about 1mph. Let's say it takes an average of 10 months for a dog to go from puppy to a fully grown adult.
10 months = 305 days = 7320 hours.
Short elevator ride = 7320miles (close to the diameter of the earth)
Assuming dog is 16 years old in second photo:
16 years = 192 months = 5856 days = 140,544hours."
Why would this person assume the dog is SIXTEEN years old??? Dogs can grow that much in like a single year
Big-a*s dogs like that don't usually even live half that long
Load More Replies...I'm guessing the puppy is already 2-3 months old, but a large-breed dog like that may take 1.5-2 years to reach full adult size.
Or less or more, that's subjective. In working with theoreticals you use the earliest/lowest known figure.
Load More Replies...You would need a smaller breed of dog, as the average lifespan of a husky is 12 to 15 years.
unless it was raised very well with a lot of care, a dog can live past the "lifespan" for about 2-3 years
Load More Replies...So, embrace math, and embrace the comment section while you’re at it by introducing some of your useless but not really math down below.
But if you can’t be bothered with reconfiguring your keyboard just to show off your 1337 math skills, then why not just dive deep into the subreddit itself or check out our previous article on the topic.
Could This Be A Viable Weapon? How Hard Would It Hit?
"Definitely. Let's assume that you go to Walmart and get yourself a 70.8 gram bottle of extra fine doom. You then load up your hypervelocity shotgun with it and accelerate those grains to 99% of the speed of light.
By the lorentz factor, your glitter now contains 91 grams c2 of kinetic energy. By E=mc2 , you now have 8 terajoules of energy, or around 115 times the energy released during the Hiroshima explosion. If this glitter were an asteroid traveling at classical speeds, it would have the destructive potential of the asteroid that created Meteor Crater in Arizona. There are very few things that could withstand that. While the exact mechanics of what would happen depends heavily on the target, it's safe to say that all but the most hardened structures would not survive."
The glitter slows down remarkably quickly in air. So is this a fleet of ships or a fleet of space ships? If the ships of either type are in air then it wouldn't work. If the ships are in interstellar space then it would.
I’m convinced that another one of these trolls has seen my account again. Long time no see, and I’m delighted to know that at least SOMEone still sees me being annoying out there :)
Load More Replies...How Long Would It Actually Take?
"It takes 42 adult-minutes to build a snowman.
It takes 63 child-minutes to build a snowman. Therefore, 1.5 child-minutes = 1 adult-minute.
If all 6 people are working together, they collectively do 3 adult-minutes and 3 child-minutes of work per minute, or (converting) 5 adult-minutes per minute.
Hence, it will take 42/5 = 8 minutes, 24 seconds to build the snowman."
From Ambrose Bierce's "The Devil's Dictionary": (1) Sixty men can do a piece of work sixty times as quickly as one man. (2) One man can dig a post hole in sixty seconds. Therefore (3) Sixty men can dig one post hole in one second.
🐈⬛ catches 🐀 in 1 hour. 🐈⬛🐈⬛ catch 🐀🐀 in ... ??? 🤔🤭🤷🏽
Load More Replies...It will take about 14 minutes. Because having multiple people roll one of the snowman parts together doesn't help. If anything, the kids are getting in the way. They can just throw snowballs at the adults or something.
I too believed that added labour doesn't increase speed, and thus 14 minutes is the fastest possible completion for those specific people.
Load More Replies...Isn't this the "three women making a baby" problem? If it takes one woman nine months to make a baby, how long does it take three women? Also nine months, because more hands doesn't reduce the amount of time it takes to make a baby
No. Because time building a snowman is effort based, wheras growing a zygote to full term is time based, like cooking. For example, you can't instantly cook a dish by heating it to a million degrees, but if you wanted to destroy something, than more heat would do it faster as a general rule. In the case of building a snowman, more help would reduce the time needed (to a point of course, with diminishing returns before it reaches the point that more people actually just slow the process down by getting in the way).
Load More Replies...An Ancient Communication System Goes Around The World In Under A Day
"The beacons are lit, Cape Town calls for aid!" "Great, tell them we'll be there in a few decades."
I'm not sure what you're thinking of, but humans arrive in Australia around 50,000 years ago and the Byzantium Empire was about 330-1453 BCE
Load More Replies...What Is The Answer To This?
"There is a mathematical operation called concatenation (with symbol ||) that just combines two numbers. For example, 23 || 71 = 2371.
Therefore, 9 || 9 + 9 / 9 = 99 + 1 = 100"
Oh dear, I somehow just forgot about that rascally concatenation. Maybe next time . . .
I was curious and looked it up. Much better to just grasp that explanation than look up the mathematic definition
Load More Replies...With just the word based problem, there is nothing stopping you from just writing or saying 99 + 9/9 = 100. There was no rule saying there had to be an operator between each nine.
How Long Would It Actually Take For A Monkey To Randomly Accidentally Write Out The Entire Works Of Shakespeare?
"Shakespeare wrote 884,647 words, according to this article. The average word in the English language has 4.7 characters, plus spaces, so we'll assume he wrote 5042487 characters.
The average human types about 40 WPM = 200 CPM = 105,120,000 characters per year, which is about 100 times our Shakespeare set. I'll assume this is the amount a monkey can do.
Also assuming the monkey can only press one key at a time, and using lowercase letters, ,.-!?"() and space, there are 35 relevant keys on our idealised keyboard.
The probability for every set of 5,042,487 characters to be Shakespeare's works would be 1/35^(5042487). For comparison, there are about 10^80 atoms in the observable universe.
It would take about 35^(5042487) strokes, and this will not be significantly change whether we use 40WPM or 1 character per year, so we can say it will take more than 35^(5042487) years"
But strangely, that monkey typed out all of Jackie Collins' novels in less than a week.
Even longer, significantly longer, because a monkey will not press keys at random, or anything like random. This was confirmed less than a year ago when scientists actually let monkeys loose with typewriters.
How Many Fans Will Be Required?
"Basically it would be impossible. You would need enough fans to cover the radius of the hurricane, all spinning fast enough to blow winds of an equal strength of that hurricane, which a regular standing fan does not have the power to do"
I’m Too Tired To Figure This Out, Can Some Please Help?
"So, lets do this rigourously. First off, I'm using the average weight for European people (average of all, male and female). The toxicity data on humans is always a bit complicated for ethical reasons, therefore I can't use a LD50. Instead, I use the LDlo, the lowest dose of caffeine which ever caused death of an human. It is averaged over man and woman LDlo as both diverge quite significantly. Also, I'm on mobile, so please excuse the formatting.
m(average human, Europe) = 70.8 kg
LDlo(human) = 192 mg/kg
m(deadly dose) = 70.8 kg • 192 mg/kg ≈ 1.36 • 104 mg = 13.6 g
m(Caffeine in 237 mL Coffee) = 96 mg
m(deadly dose of coffee cups) = 1.36 • 104 mg / 96 mg ≈ 142 [cups]
Henceforth, this comment is wrong. Even if you make extraordinary strong coffee with 200 to 250 mg caffeine, the deadly dose would still be higher than 42 cups."
But more importantly, you’ll be incapacitated before being able to drink all these cups and thus you’ll never reach the deadly dose. That’s how you empirically define a (lethal) poison. Everything can kill you if you take too much of it. Everything. But for a poison to be a poison, the lethal dose needs to be small enough to be fully and quickly ingested.
Say If U Were To Actually Find The Surface Area, How Would One Find It?
"Assuming you’re given all the side lengths/angles you need, split up each face into a bunch of triangles/trapeziums and find the area of all of them and add them all up"
And yet it seems they do. They describe the solution to the question of cell formation in curved epithelia. I only skimmed through the original abstract though. The sufaces when packed together end up concave which could be why it seems somehow off to you. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-05376-1)
Load More Replies...[request] How Many Fights Did He Roughly Take To Cost The Company $21m?
"It says in an article he "accumulated 30 million miles". Whilst it's not clear if all of that was under the lifetime pass, you could presume that's what it means. If you know the AA air miles accumulation rate, you could possibly work out how many miles he flew, rather than the number of flights."
The company may have not collected $21 million in revenue, but it didn't cost them that much. First, they operate at a profit, so the expense per seat is less than the revenue per seat. Second, every time he flew in a seat that otherwise would have gone unoccupied, the cost to the airline would have been just peanuts (figuratively and literally).
Did it really cost that airline that much though? That assumes all flights he took were fully booked so one passenger they could have booked full price couldn't fly because he had that ticket so the airline lost the price of that ticket. But are flights always sold out? If the flight wasn't sold out, it would only be the price of extra fuel the airplane would use to haul his extra weight, which I'd say is negligible. So he didn't actually cost them that much, since I doubt they'd been able to fill exactly his spot with another paying customer when the plane was not full. And I'd bet my home that they didn't fly a whole plane ever just for him. So it's doubtful he cost the company anything beyond the price he paid for his one lifetime ticket. If now several more people had bought such tickets, then the airline had a problem. But I doubt a single person would actually cost them anything more than what he paid. So he made a good deal, definitely, but the airline didn't loose that much.
What's The Impact On His Health?
"1 tablsespoon of mayo is about 13.8g
this means with 308k likes is makes about 4250.4 kilos of mayo that he has to eat
the energy of those 308k ablespoons is about 120.7 gj or 120'736'000kj devided by the recomended energy intake of 8700kj a day the mayo alone wozld last you 13877 days which is 38 years."
There's a huge variation in kj count between different brands of mayonnaise. Although the "average" energy in 100g of mayonnaise is 2,900 kj according to Wikipedia, the brand that I eat only has 575 kj per 100g. Reducing that 38 years to more like 7 years.
Can Someone Do The Math I Swear It’s 1.50?
"Ok I see now. 1$ wasn't the og price. Feels like a flip to make you assume.
x is the original price
1 is an additional dollar on top of half the original price.
Therefore x = 0.5x + 1
adding the implied 1.0 to the X for clarity and format
Subtracting the half from both sides
1.0x = 0.5x + 1
-0.5x -0.5x
turns out to be
0.5x = 1
0.5x = 1.0
÷0.5 ÷0.5
1/1 ÷ 1/2 < side work for the right side 1/1 × 2/1 because two fractions divide is equal to the latter fraction flipping and multiplying 1 x 2 = 2
therefore x = 2
God damn I thought it was 1.5$ because I assumed 1 was the initial cost when really cost = (1 + 0.5price)"
Wrong wording. At least in my language. $1+half it's price. The "it's price" could be anything. So mathematically the sentence says 1x+0.5y=?, which is not enough information to solve.
It's intentionally worse vaguely. It's really saying "a books cost happens to equal half that same cost plus one dollar
Load More Replies...For A Lottery At Work
"That looks to be a 16 oz (473 mL) wide mouth mason jar. Reese’s Pieces are about the same size as m&m’s (for which there is more data available). M&m’s range from 0.6-0.65 mL in volume, and have a packing density of about 68%.
pieces = jar volume * packing density / piece volume
So
473 mL * 0.68 / 0.6 mL = 536 pieces maximum
473 mL * 0.68 / 0.625 mL = 515 pieces average
473 mL * 0.68 / 0.65 mL = 495 pieces minimum"
There are a range of different packing densities even for spheres. 0.59 to 0.6 for loose packing. 0.61 to 0.62 for poured random packing. 0.63 to 0.64 for close random packing. 0.74 for densest packing. That's the uncertainty just for spheres. For the nonspherical shape of Reese's Pieces it becomes even more difficult to get it correct. Which is why it's like a lottery.
Sorry, but there is no way most of us could count these before we started eating them and spoiled the count. No, we don't have adequate self-control to only eat the ones we have already counted.
Get the count first. Count as your putting in and buy plenty of extra bags
Load More Replies...Assuming You Knew The Solution, How Many Unique Passwords Would There Be?
"For a start, Wiles' proof of Fermat's Last Theorem was 129 pages long.
Wikipedia's summary of the proof is itself approximately 5,700 characters long.
So you wouldn't be able to fit that into a password which was just 732 to 942 characters long."
Exactly. Password "difficulty" is just ridiculous. If your software only allows three tries before shutting down for the day, as it should. Then even a password containing 4 characters, all numerical digits, would take on average more than 3 years to crack. Because hackers use password lists, longer and more complicated passwords are not that much more dfificult to hack.
Sorry, theorems have proofs, not solutions. So I get to keep using "opensesame" as my password.
What's The Maths Behind This
"This demonstrates the gamblers fallacy. It is the incorrect belief that, if a particular event occurs more frequently than normal during the past, it is less likely to happen in the future"
You would still have a 50% chance, but that would tend to prove that the 50% number is wrong
I would think that different doctors/hospitals/teams would have different survival rates.
Yeah, I would definitely pick this doctor. If I go to some other doctor, it might turn out to be the one who lost his last twenty patients.
Load More Replies...It only works in perfect systems. A lottery with all numbers having the same likelihood to be pulled or laplace dices, coin throws with perfect friction every time etc. In this case there are too many unknown factors to even tell if the 50% are even accurate. One factor would be the abilities and talents of the doctor. If in all cases of this surgery happening, so far 50% percent had died directly caused by the surgery, that would also mean the patients undergoing that surgery would have so far a 50% survival rate. But that wouldn't mean that this individual patient had this chance with this doctor. Even if the survival rate was just from this one doctor, him having successfully operated on the last 20 patients would be a strong indicator that his skills are better now. Surgery isn't a Laplace experiment.
Which is why the pictures tell us that normal people aren't gamblers.
How Many Calories Would This Be?
"A 14" pepperoni pizza from Dominos is 2240 calories, per their online calculator. 28" is 4x the area, so 8960. Divided by 2, that's 4480. 32 oz of full-sugar Coke is about 400 calories. So if you factor in inaccuracies with all the multiplication, you'd probably want to round it to 5000 per person"
So, is that easy or not? Don't base the calculation on calories per person, that's stupid. Base it on volume of stomach and intestines. And in doing the challenge, make sure to force those drinks to go flat before drinking them.
It's equivalent to 4 large pizzas, plus the drinks. Each person has 2 hours to eat 2 large pizzas, so not easy but still doable for the right people.
Load More Replies...I was a teenager once, 5000 calories worth of pizza would have been completely doable.
So two drinks and a big pizza for $50??? This challenge is not about your stomach's capacity. It's about your brain's.
Does This “Logic” Question Have A Simple Solution?
"It is supposed to say “One* digit is repeated” not “Ones”.
The correct answer is 24,849."
It means the digit in the 10s space equals 40. Which means they're telling us explicitly that the digit is xx,x4x.
Load More Replies...I love it when people fix the question in order to getba unique answer!
How Long Would It Take To Figure Out The Code
"I am a locksmith.
Each button can only be pressed once. Pressing multiple buttons simultaneously is allowed. Not all buttons must be pressed.
There are over 1000 combinations, so you would think that it would take less than an hour to try them all if each attempt took 3 seconds."
That looks like a purely mechanical lock, so the locksmith's assumptions are fundamentally flawed. In practice all five buttons must be pressed once - after that they will all be reset to try again. So the answer is actually 5 factorial, 120 possible combinations.
Based on the few of these I've seen I think he meant no button can be pressed more than one time in a row. So the total number of combinations would be 5! + n(4!) where n is the maximum number of inputs allowed
Load More Replies...Is This True?
"No. The Carbon Majors Report which this statistic comes from only looks at industrial emissions, not total emissions, excluding things like emissions from agriculture and deforestation. It's also assigning any emissions from downstream consumption of fossil fuels to the producer, which is like saying that the emissions from me filling up my car at a BP filling station are entirely BP's fault. These "scope 3" emissions from end consumption account for 90% of the fossil fuel emissions.
In addition, it's technically looking at producers, not corporations, so all coal produced in China counts as a single producer, while this will be mined by multiple companies."
Say what? A what filling station? And what fault? Now whenever I see BP I think it’s BoredPanda
We can't control what they do. We can only control what WE do. And we should all try to do our best.
If you stop using plastic straws then you're not recycling. Plastic straws cam be reused indefinitely. Paper ones kill trees.
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, but if a person stops using one plastic item (straws), they can continue to recycle the other items they use. Also, plastic cannot be used indefinitely, it breaks down quite easily (into microplastics, which are becoming a massive issue and reducing lifespans of animals all over the planet). Third, yes, paper straws are made from trees, but trees can easily be regrown, and paper does not have the same environmental impact once it is disposed of that plastic does. Therefore, paper is much more environmentally sustainable.
Load More Replies...How Much Ice Would It Take To Lower The Entire Ocean's Temperature By, Say, 10 Degrees Fahrenheit?
"Dumping a big ice cube in the ocean will only postpone the inevitable, what you want to do is vent all the gas from the combustion engines directly upwards at noon, all at the same time from the same location, that will cause the Earth's orbit to be a little bit further away from the sun, that'll cool down the water. It would also make the orbit bigger, which would add an extra week to the year, I propose we call it Robot Party Week"
How Many Lucky Holiday Goers Do You Think Could Fit On This Monstrosity?
"Using Kwaloon Walled City as a reference (which is apt given the image), you can have a stacked population density of 1.5 people per square meter. Due to the height here, I think we can triple that to 4.5 people per square meter.
That ship is vast. I can only estimate the dimensions poorly, but let’s go 150m by 1000m.
That’s 150 x 1000 x 4.5 people, or 675 000 people.
For reference, Peach Trees (from the amazing Dredd) had only 75 000 residents."
The answer is zero because if you actually ended up on this monstrosity you would automatically be unlucky.
Every time I remember the fact there isn't a Dredd 2 I shout Drokk.
Load More Replies...How To Prove?
"Just say by Peano's axioms. The later of which basically state that there is a successor function S(n)=n+1. So if you plug 1 in S(1)=1+1=2. It's just that simple. You can alternatively use the different set of axioms in 1910 Whitehead/Russell Principia Mathematica, rather grandiosly named for the book by Newton. That makes the problem harder, but some axioms needed for it can be proved using Peano's axioms, so there is really no point to doing things the hard way."
Good answer! For the Whitehead/Russell way, the proof is not just harder, it's darn near impossible.
How Big Is The Second Ship?
"The boat is approximately 19 pixels high to the deck and 64 long if I match it with a circle with r 1118 pixels that matches that curve. (I did this quickly in Paint, so it's a very rough estimate.)
The earth has a radius of 6371km = 1118p
Thus 5.69km = 1p
Boat length = 64p * 5.69 = 364.708km long
Boat Height = 19p * 5.69 = 108.272km high
So according to my rough calculations, the boat's deck would officially be in space.
The front sail is 42p high, so 239km"
Every Flat Earther I know is also mixed up in multiple other conspiracy theories. It's not about believing in different scientific theories, it's about drawing attention to themselves.
Is This Calculation Correct?
"The age of the Earth is probably closer to 4.5 billion, but that's whatever.
Homo Sapiens has been around for around 300,000 years. Relative to the age of the Earth, that's 3 * 105 / (4.5 * 109) = 3/4.5 * 104 = 1/15,000 = 0.000666...
Taking 45 years and multiplying it by that factor gives us the scaled-down value. But let's first convert 45 years into seconds (screw leap years):
45 years = 45 y * 365 d/y * 24 h/d * 60 min/h * 60 s/min = 1,419,120,000 seconds
1,419,120,000 s * 1/15,000 = 94,608 s = 94,608 / 3,600 s/h = 26.28 h.
So that's already off.
Maybe they meant something else by "we have been here" - but I'd say the emergence of Homo Sapiens is the most reasonable interpretation.
Moving on, the industrial revolution began around 1760, that's 2023-1760 = 263 years ago.
Same method as before. First get the fraction of Earth's lifespan:
263 / (4.5 * 109) = 5.8444... * 10-8 =~ 1/17,110,266
Then use that as a factor on our 45 years in seconds:
1,419,120,000 s * 1/17,110,266 =~ 82.94 seconds.
A bit more than a minute, but close enough, I'd say.
Regarding the "50% of the world's forests", Wikipedia has the following to say:
About 31% of Earth's land surface is covered by forests at present. This is one-third less than the forest cover before the expansion of agriculture, with half of that loss occurring in the last century.
One-third less since the expansion of agriculture is not the same as 50% since the industrial revolution.
But then we could argue about the meaning of "destroyed"..."
If we immediately stopped existing, yes, the environment would probably recover within a few human generations. But that doesn't undo the damage already done. Countless species have gone extinct as a direct result of human actions. Not to mention the fact that we continue to do the stupid s**t that got us into this mess.
Load More Replies...Theoretically Could A File Be Compressed That Much? And How Much Data Is That?
"Theoretically yes, depending on what the data is like.
If I have a binary data file that's just 10^100 ones I can fully represent it with the words "ten raised to the power of one hundred ones". That's technically data compression in so far as a program could take it and use it to recreate the original file somewhere else. It's just not very useful because there was no actual information in a file that's all ones.
To get 55.4 yottabytes compressed down to 2.62 MB you'd need the data in the original file to contain almost no actual information or you'd need to use a compression so lossy that you'd lose almost all the information in the original file."
To be a bomb it doesn't need to contain information, it just has to overwrite files that do contain information. Which unzipping software won't allow you to do. So all he's done (if his claim is true) is create a zip file that can't be unzipped.
There is an ultimate zero losses data compression method. Just 1 dot on a 1 meter stick. That's all it takes. Seriously. How? Assign "A" as 001, "B" as 002 and so on. We can then build words and texts from them. To compress the texts, use the ratio of two distances, expressed in decimal form. By letting the distance from one end of the stick to the dot as the numerator and the dot to the other end of the stick as the denominator, we can obtain our desired ratio. Hence we got our data accurately compressed. The only issue is, we need to do super ultra precise dot placement. We have to go way beyond plank-length level of precision to encode any substantial length of text this way.
What Is Casey Missing?
"There is an infinite number of answers, but in first grade I probably would’ve drawn two dots positioned arbitrarily in the fourth box."
I'd go with 4 circles. Each box contains the sum of the ones preceding. But it could also just be 2. Very arbitrary.
How Big Would Someone Have To Be To Effectively Use This In Battle?
"First of all the the longest Odachi is Haja-no-Ontachi, with a length of 465cm
Second of all the longest odachi (that I know of) used in combat was Taro tachi, a 288 cm long odachi wielded by Magara Naotaka who was 210 cm himself. So he would have to be 274.9 cm tall to wield a 377 cm odachi while having the hight to sword length ratio.
That would be 9 feat tall btw"
The calculation would have to be based on weight and torque due to lever arm, not height. Being wielded horizontally, obviously, it would have to be spun on a near vertical axis like the swing of a baseball bat. You couldn't reverse direction so would just have to swing through 360 degrees, so would get dizzy unless you had ballet training. Doable by a normal height person, but only for a short period of time.
Which Would Give You The Most? (Ig For Simplicity The Person Lives Until 70 And Lives An Average Life)
"~22,000 breaths per day = ~562.485 million breaths so around $140.6 million in 70 years
in 80 years the avg moderately active person takes ~216,262,500 steps, so we can average this to ~2.7m steps/year, and subtract the first year since most 0-12mo olds don't walk, especially not 2.7m steps in that year, we get $186.3m
$100/day for 70 years is $2.55m, by far the worst choice so far
Words vary from 2000-20,000 per day, and generally starts around year one. Assuming you want to maximize money, people can speak ~150WPM, and could realistically spend ~16 hours/day talking (assuming like 5 hours sleep and some amount of time eating where you can't really speak), so this could potentially be ~144,000 words/day, so assuming you never stop talking while awake for 69 years after you start, this comes out to ~$1.813 Billion. Realistically it's probably closer to $1 Billion because talking constantly for 16 hours a day would be very difficult.
making moves and breaking bonds are the wildcards....theoretically you could break billions of bonds if you, say, controlled a fission reactor, so there's potential for virtually unlimited money here."
"talking constantly for 16 hours a day would be very difficult" You have not met my daughter.
I think making moves means chatting up, and breaking bonds means breaking up with someone. I'm pretty sure that the writer didn't have nuclear reactors in mind. PS. I sincerely hope that the person who wrote this song is in prison or under a restraining order.
How Many Triangles Are Actually In This Image?
"I got 24, 6 per layer.
3 for each side ( left-middle-right to the top), left and middle, right and middle, and the equilateral of the whole thing."
I get 24. From the top count down in every combination that creates a triangle. So four left, Four lef and center. Four left center and right. Just all possibilities with the left give us 12. Then four center. Four center and right. That's eight more. 20 Then four right. 24.
How High Should A Building Be If Cinemas Worked Like This?
"Assuming this is only the credits, that a line of credit is onscreen for 5 seconds, and that there are 10 minutes of credits:
We get a total of 600/5 = 120 full screen heights. I don't really know how large a cinema screen is, but assuming 5 meters we get about 600 meters tall."
120 full screen heights seems excessive. Come to think of it, ten minutes of credits seems excessive, too. Three minutes of credits seems more realistic, less for older films.
What Answer Is Correct 120 Or 5??
"120 is correct. 5! or 5 factorial is also 120."
Am i stupid? Arent you supposed to calculate 1+2 first, then 230 x3 would be 690, then 230 - 690... Would be - 460??? How is it 120? I am lost....
The equation should've been 230-220x(1÷2). Note the division.
Load More Replies...OK. Maybe I'm showing my age here...... The way I was taught arithmetic is: 230-220 =10. 1+2 =3 10 x 3 = 30. (Solve the bracketed equation and then solve from the left.)
English isn't my native language I'm so sorry: Okay so first you calculate the brakes 1+2=3. Then you have to calculate the "points" before you do the "lines", aka ×/÷ always before +/- and then you
Common core math is simple. It is just different than what you are used to.
Load More Replies...I used to have fun doing all sorts of calculations like this. Memories.
Common core math is simple. It is just different than what you are used to.
Load More Replies...I used to have fun doing all sorts of calculations like this. Memories.
