Twitter user Gurwinder regularly shares thoughts on various topics, including psychology, philosophy, and politics. However, one of their recent uploads offers all the above. And then some.
On February 11, Gurwinder posted a mega-thread, promising to broaden everyone's understanding of the world in just a few minutes.
In it, there are 40 concepts about human behavior and the world we live in. Scientists often spend years studying, researching, and analyzing complex phenomena but Gurwinder cuts to the very core of their findings and manages to explain everything in plain English.
Whether you decide to scroll through the entire thread or have time for only a couple of entries, I can assure you that it will be well worth it.
This post may include affiliate links.
Like the spinach error? http://super-myths.blogspot.com/2010/12/spinach-iron-decimal-point-error-myth.html?m=1
Such conclusions begin with a scientific method that allows us to collect measurable, empirical evidence in an experiment related to a hypothesis (often in the form of an if/then statement), designed to support or contradict a theory.
And that's really exciting. "As a field biologist, my favorite part of the scientific method is being in the field collecting the data," Jaime Tanner, a professor of biology at Marlboro College, told Live Science. "But what really makes that fun is knowing that you are trying to answer an interesting question. So the first step in identifying questions and generating possible answers (hypotheses) is also very important and is a creative process. Then once you collect the data, you analyze it to see if your hypothesis is supported or not."
I know for a fact this is true:)) found it comforting actually. Though maybe it's not very social.
It's a bit like when you remember something that you did that was horrifyingly embarrassing. It embarrassed YOU so it sticks in YOUR head. Everyone else is concentrating on the things that THEY did that were embarrassing. I find that comforting! At 3 am when I think 'why did I DO THAT?!'
Load More Replies...
Be comforted in the fact that your cringe moments that keep you up an night, have none of the emotional weight (therefore staying-power) in the minds of others. Most people will have a rapidly fading memory of it over time as well.
Oh, I literally just posted a comment making the same point and then scrolled down and this... totally agree Neill.
Load More Replies...
I feel like I'm on stage when I'm in my backyard because we're surrounded by apartment buildings. It makes me walk weird.
this is something I tell my socially anxious missus when she's recalling her day and how she felt everyone was looking at her when she stuttered a response to the checkout person at the supermarket or such...... they likely don't remember or care cause they're just trying to get through their own day, not going home laughing to their partner at her because she said yes twice in a row.
I can't count the number of times I've replied with "you too!" To a cashier when that wasn't the appropriate response. At this point I just shrug. They know what I meant, probably. If not, I blame the lack of social interaction for the last couple years. Yep. That's definitely the only reason I'm socially awkward /s.
Load More Replies...
Everytime I'm in public I worry so much about what others think, that once I get home I realize I can't remember anything about the other people I saw, so it's nice to know they probably don't remember anything about me either.
Exactly. Don't worry about them watching you dance, they're all worried about being watched.
I remember reading a motivational poster somewhere that said something like "what others think of me is none of my business". It just made me think about how awful I'd feel if anyone knew what I was thinking because I might not prefer their hair a certain way, but it's their choice and I'd feel awful if they were discouraged by my thoughts. And if I feel that way, others probably do too. They are probably far more concerned with what I think of them than how they think of me and would be mortified if I suddenly knew their thoughts. It was oddly reassuring.
I think this is true of adults, but it can be false for teens. Teens scrutinize the heck out of each other, often looking for the barest flaw. Just wearing your shirt tucked in was fodder for ridicule at my school. Or parting your hair on the wrong side. I'm not kidding.
It's true, but I don't know think they genuinely care what others are wearing or doing. It's a way of shifting focus off of themselves because they are so self conscious. I know that makes a fat lot of difference when you're the one being ridiculed, but knowing that it isn't a real flaw on your part can maybe take a bit of the sting out maybe. As an adult, I only talk to one person from my high school, and we only reconnected recently through our kids. But after high school, at least in my experience, most people acted like "what happened in high school, stays in high school". Even the ones that used to be bullies (that I've met again since) have been super nice. Obviously that's not always the case because there's plenty of jerks out there and they went to school somewhere, but high school is just a really weird social experiment that isn't really replicated in society anywhere else.
Load More Replies... 
It's delusional to think people are scrutinizing you especially when you're not even that interesting
According to Highline College, the steps of the scientific method are something like this:
- Make an observation or observations;
- Form a hypothesis — a tentative description of what's been observed, and make predictions based on that hypothesis;
- Test the hypothesis and predictions in an experiment that can be reproduced;
- Analyze the data and draw conclusions; accept or reject the hypothesis or modify the hypothesis if necessary;
- Reproduce the experiment until there are no discrepancies between observations and theory.
Few years back, had been promoted to low lvl manager and was going nuts, trying to fix every problem so as to be well evaluated. One long time high lvl manager saw me once and said: "if we solve every problem we will not be needed to come to work tomorrow".
"Replication of methods and results is my favorite step in the scientific method," Moshe Pritsker, a former post-doctoral researcher at Harvard Medical School and CEO of JoVE, also told Live Science.
"The reproducibility of published experiments is the foundation of science. No reproducibility — no science."
Yes, we're finding that out now, to our great cost. The psychological harm that would have to be done for people to admit "He DIDN'T make America great again; he only passed one piece of legislation (tax cuts) which increased the debt and deficit astonishingly, and there's increasing evidence he is a white supremacist and wannabe-autocrat who lies endlessly and is actually guilty of everything he has accused others of" is massive, and people want to avoid it, so they keep defending him. Those who follow this comment with remarks like "living rent free in your head" will prove my point ;)
I would argue that people make their avatar based on the personality they want to have/show.
The backbone of the scientific method is generating and testing a hypothesis. After an idea has been confirmed over many experiments, it can be called a scientific theory. While a theory explains a phenomenon, a scientific law provides a description of a phenomenon, according to The University of Waikato. Take the law of conservation of energy, for example. It is the first law of thermodynamics and says that energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
A law describes an observed phenomenon, but it doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. "In science, laws are a starting place," said Peter Coppinger, an associate professor of biology and biomedical engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. "From there, scientists can then ask the questions, 'Why and how?'"
If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed and if you read the newspaper you are misinformed. - Mark Twain
If I remember correctly, it wasn't that people wanted to criticise, it was that they couldn't stand letting a false statement stand uncorrected. It's the need to go "I think you'll find.." which isn't quite the same at criticism (and a concept I do realize I've just demonstrated)
Laws are usually considered to be without exception, though some get modified over time if further testing finds discrepancies. For instance, Newton's laws of motion describe everything we've observed in the macroscopic world, but they break down at the subatomic level.
But this does not mean theories are meaningless. For a hypothesis to become a theory, scientists have to conduct rigorous testing, typically across multiple disciplines. Saying something is "just a theory" can be misleading as the scientific definition of "theory" and the layperson's understanding of it can be very different. To most people, a theory is a hunch but in science, it's the framework for observations and facts.
As a previous journalist I always took "burying the lede" as a criticism that you missed the real story in your story and need to rethink it. Outside of organizations who are only interested in propaganda (Fox News) most journalists I know would be ashamed, and have no motivation, to do this purposely.
This doesn't work on Deborah! I got her to do me a favour once, now the resentment levels are through the roof!
Tribalism is less dangerous if people also develop some self-awareness. The ability to self-examine and say "I may not be being consistent here" or "If I believe X (which I like) then logically that leads to Y (which I don't like at all) but the two are bound together so I can't just pick X and ignore Y" is absolutely crucial to being balanced but a lot of people do not seem to be able to be self-aware at all.
Probably all of us know someone who constantly questions and challenges everything they see and hear. No matter how much evidence is in front of them.
"The quality of cynicism, in its extreme, can be one component of the personality trait known as Machiavellianism," Susan Krauss Whitbourne, a professor emerita of psychological and brain sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, wrote in Psychology Today. "You might already know what this quality is just by the term alone, but its formal definition includes not just a tendency to manipulate and exploit others, but also a deeply-held belief that others are, as the saying goes, 'out to get them.'"
I want to upvote this entry but of course they're all numbered so I can't! This is so important. My favorite example of this right now is climate change. We have SO MANY SOLUTIONS and around 25% of emissions reductions can be achieved at the normal household level. And yet there are so many people saying "Oh, it's all big business, it's out of our hands, we're doomed" etc. We are not doomed. Things are bad but you CAN take action. Top thing you can do: 1. Throw away less food. Next best: 2. Eat less meat (particularly beef). Those are ACHIEVABLE. Problem-solving FTW! 🙂
Some of my teachers uses to tell us to find someone who can sit with us so that we can explain the things we learnt that day. Or at least sir a doll or something in front of us and teach it. I have subjected my mom to a lot of my "teaching" over the years and still do. She studied commerce and I'm a science student so that makes it hard sometimes but I think she understands some of the stuff I talk about. And it makes me really happy when she does
If you grew up in Germany after the war and before 1989, you know how hard the Cold War was fought in our heads. Both, West and East have constantly been trying to picture each other as the villain.
"In research on the underlying motivation of the Machiavellian, TU Dorman University's Christian Blötner and Sebastian Bergold proposed that what they call 'avoidance' motivation leads these individuals to experience a deep sense of distrust and highly 'negative views of human nature," Whitbourne explained.
But not all cynics would qualify as people high on this overall trait of Machiavellianism. "It's possible that the very skeptical have simply developed a so-called 'cognitive style,' or analytical type of mindset that causes them to look at situations from all possible angles."
Or simply wait the 48 hours after forming opinions and beliefs before voicing them?
I disagree. For example, graphs A and B could be of the same data but viewed from different axes. Likewise, C could be the same data, but more accurately shown.
"Indeed, you might argue that some form of cynicism is adaptive," Whitbourne said. "Think about the highly gullible people you know who are easily swayed by whatever winds might be sweeping over the media landscape. Not only could they put themselves at risk for being swindled by the ads that fund the media landscape, but they can also be led to accept faulty information that puts their health and well-being in jeopardy. Maybe it is better to think twice or perhaps three times before rushing into such a poor decision."
I've also heard this argument misapplied to a degree. If you have someone who is a constant, selfish, lying manipulator, and that person seems to come up with a good idea, it's time to examine that idea very closely. Not because that person couldn't possibly suggest something helpful and good, but because of the high likelihood that they're presenting misleading facts along with it, or misrepresenting what the effects will be, because you know the person must have a selfish agenda behind the idea or they would never ever bring it up.
Whenever my mom tells me some shocking news she learned from F'book, I assume it's not true.
In fact, knowing why some people believe in unsubstantiated claims and why misinformation guides their actions can be a valuable tool for resisting these traps. If you question loud phrases, you aren't automatically a cynic. Maybe you're just (a very healthy) skeptic.
The President would outsource the kill and avoid confronting reality personally.
This is basically what Diogenes the Cynic said. You have to get outside of your society's norms to see your society as it is.
See also: "Sugar makes kids hyperactive", and the myths surrounding MSG.
Describing Zersetzung like this, would be like describing the Hindenburg disaster as 'an inconveniently timed surprise campfire'. It was systematic deconstruction of people's lives to prevent them from any rebellion against the state - including ruining their careers, their home life, separating them from their loved ones, their children. It was targeting the human soul, it wasn't an April Fool's prank.
I am so glad I fulfilled my biological imperative already. Now I don't have to impress anybody.
People loved the thread and some even provided more interesting insights
www.yourfallacy.is and www.yourbias.is are great sites with similar content.
Dunning-Kruger is one of the most unusual and inventive concepts, but by golly, it's so damn true.
The irony of Dunning-Kruger is it's one of the most known, but also most misunderstood effects of it's kind. And most people don't realize they didn't get it right.
Load More Replies...
I have the Tony Effect, named after my friend. It is thus: the problem where someone can't take a compliment, turning everything into a "no u" battle. I have the Gracie-Inara Effect: in every children's choir there will be that one kid who sings the loudest and the most out of tune. And finally, I have the Queen Kate Issue, where if you think about someone as a romantic interest for long enough, you'll actually think you're in love with them. These are things I have experienced and what I have found to be true. And now I show them to the world.
If I never read anything on BP again, this piece will be the one I will remember!
Very interesting. However, after reading the typical left rants ( I'm neither left or right. Registered independent) I've come to the conclusion that skagsy is the the smartest poster on here. My favorites were the ones where they stated "oh he meant this not what he said". No, I'm pretty sure he said exactly what he meant. Again, interesting. I've heard/read about half of these previously but always good to review.
The last two commetns made me laugh. Personally, I probably use Hanlon'S Razor in my life, the most and I suffer most under the Peter principle, but there were a lot of additional nuggets in this thread-
Honest question... Are there really that many people that are so obsessed with being "Anti-Trump" still, or is BP just filled with bots and trolls continuing to try and stir division. Like #14 above, it was just unnecessary. I know that BP is very left leaning as are (what seems) most people on here, but seriously, it is almost every post there is some anti trump/right wing comment. I think I am just about done with BP because of all of the hate filled comments by people that claim to be tolerant. Just wondering how much is by actual people and how much is Russian/Chinese/Whoever bad actors sewing more division to keep the US divided.
PTSD sticks around. Some are still miserable because or the crap he pulled, and is continuing to pull. Every day theres some new revelation in the news about some bad thing he did. Having family members that are forever-trumpers is like having a scab picked off so the wound never gets to heal.
Load More Replies... www.yourfallacy.is and www.yourbias.is are great sites with similar content.
Dunning-Kruger is one of the most unusual and inventive concepts, but by golly, it's so damn true.
The irony of Dunning-Kruger is it's one of the most known, but also most misunderstood effects of it's kind. And most people don't realize they didn't get it right.
Load More Replies... I have the Tony Effect, named after my friend. It is thus: the problem where someone can't take a compliment, turning everything into a "no u" battle. I have the Gracie-Inara Effect: in every children's choir there will be that one kid who sings the loudest and the most out of tune. And finally, I have the Queen Kate Issue, where if you think about someone as a romantic interest for long enough, you'll actually think you're in love with them. These are things I have experienced and what I have found to be true. And now I show them to the world.
If I never read anything on BP again, this piece will be the one I will remember!
Very interesting. However, after reading the typical left rants ( I'm neither left or right. Registered independent) I've come to the conclusion that skagsy is the the smartest poster on here. My favorites were the ones where they stated "oh he meant this not what he said". No, I'm pretty sure he said exactly what he meant. Again, interesting. I've heard/read about half of these previously but always good to review.
The last two commetns made me laugh. Personally, I probably use Hanlon'S Razor in my life, the most and I suffer most under the Peter principle, but there were a lot of additional nuggets in this thread-
Honest question... Are there really that many people that are so obsessed with being "Anti-Trump" still, or is BP just filled with bots and trolls continuing to try and stir division. Like #14 above, it was just unnecessary. I know that BP is very left leaning as are (what seems) most people on here, but seriously, it is almost every post there is some anti trump/right wing comment. I think I am just about done with BP because of all of the hate filled comments by people that claim to be tolerant. Just wondering how much is by actual people and how much is Russian/Chinese/Whoever bad actors sewing more division to keep the US divided.
PTSD sticks around. Some are still miserable because or the crap he pulled, and is continuing to pull. Every day theres some new revelation in the news about some bad thing he did. Having family members that are forever-trumpers is like having a scab picked off so the wound never gets to heal.
Load More Replies...
