Twitter User Explains 40 Concepts Everyone Should Know To Understand The World Better
Twitter user Gurwinder regularly shares thoughts on various topics, including psychology, philosophy, and politics. However, one of their recent uploads offers all the above. And then some.
On February 11, Gurwinder posted a mega-thread, promising to broaden everyone's understanding of the world in just a few minutes.
In it, there are 40 concepts about human behavior and the world we live in. Scientists often spend years studying, researching, and analyzing complex phenomena but Gurwinder cuts to the very core of their findings and manages to explain everything in plain English.
Whether you decide to scroll through the entire thread or have time for only a couple of entries, I can assure you that it will be well worth it.
This post may include affiliate links.
No, that’s how the human brain works. There is a study about washing apples with a monkey group and unlike humans, there wasn’t the same “copy and teach” behavior as prevalent in our ape brain.
Load More Replies...Herd mentality is real. People frequently think the "right" thing to do is what everybody else is doing. I have seen this be disastrous in the event of serious accidents where everyone is watching and nobody is doing anything. Fortunately, as an autist who marches to the beat of her own kazoo, I never have a problem being different, and I've twice been able to step in and take control of bad accidents.
Braingame ( a tv show) 2 people just stood outside a door. Soon, people start to line up. No one even asked why or what those 2 were waiting for.
Shoot, even when I think I know what the line is for, I still end up asking everyone around me to make sure. Never want to be in a rollercoaster line when I just wanted the spinning teacups...
Load More Replies...If you are starting to read, this is a great thread, but if you really want to enjoy it the most, from this point going forward, just avoid reading the comments
Not sure if it's the same in other industries but in my company (fintech) we have a dedicated team that helps with technology adoption, also known as business adoption, where users are supported and encouraged to use new tools and technology when things are implemented. You can spend a ridiculous amount on bringing in a new application or reporting system but if everyone wants to keep using the old one it's a waste of everyone's time and money.
Specifically, men found it to be unmasculine and women took it as an insult to their ability to carry things.
The original "influencers" being paid to hock a product. Now it's all about the bed-in-a-box.
Also explains why if one person wears or doesn't wear a mask, others will follow suit
Like the spinach error? http://super-myths.blogspot.com/2010/12/spinach-iron-decimal-point-error-myth.html?m=1
This is why Popeye was supposed to gain superhuman abilities from snarfing spinach.
Load More Replies...In my experience as a statistician/researcher, I've found a quote by Asimov to be most telling: “The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the most discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but 'That's funny...”
Do note that not everything that is noteworthy is wrong, it's just more unlikely to be wrong. Interesting discoveries are still happening and it's mostly a different point of view that, when taken, all of a sudden opens a lot of doors and connects a lot of dots. Making it in itself boring again. So if great data doesnt become boring in it's newly discoverd context, well then the chance of it being wrong is infinite.
It's more interesting to think the vaccine will kill you or give you aids than just simply keep you safe.
Such conclusions begin with a scientific method that allows us to collect measurable, empirical evidence in an experiment related to a hypothesis (often in the form of an if/then statement), designed to support or contradict a theory.
And that's really exciting. "As a field biologist, my favorite part of the scientific method is being in the field collecting the data," Jaime Tanner, a professor of biology at Marlboro College, told Live Science. "But what really makes that fun is knowing that you are trying to answer an interesting question. So the first step in identifying questions and generating possible answers (hypotheses) is also very important and is a creative process. Then once you collect the data, you analyze it to see if your hypothesis is supported or not."
I know for a fact this is true:)) found it comforting actually. Though maybe it's not very social.
Be comforted in the fact that your cringe moments that keep you up an night, have none of the emotional weight (therefore staying-power) in the minds of others. Most people will have a rapidly fading memory of it over time as well.
I feel like I'm on stage when I'm in my backyard because we're surrounded by apartment buildings. It makes me walk weird.
this is something I tell my socially anxious missus when she's recalling her day and how she felt everyone was looking at her when she stuttered a response to the checkout person at the supermarket or such...... they likely don't remember or care cause they're just trying to get through their own day, not going home laughing to their partner at her because she said yes twice in a row.
Everytime I'm in public I worry so much about what others think, that once I get home I realize I can't remember anything about the other people I saw, so it's nice to know they probably don't remember anything about me either.
Whataboutism is related but kinda reversed. That's used when someone says "Donald Trump incited sedition and lied about his finances" and someone else says "But what about Hillary Clinton's emails?" They deflect from the bad actions of one person by bringing up something actually unrelated but what they hope people will talk about instead, trying to remove attention from the bad actions of the person they like.
Load More Replies...People love using this argument whenever they get a ticket from the police. 'Why are you out here looking for speeders when there are unsolved murders?!?!'
Or complaining that other people were going faster and he was only speeding to keep up with the traffic.
Load More Replies...Similar to how people talk about how in some places Hijabs are forced whenever people bring up the fact that people should be allowed to wear them. Both are examples of unnecessary policing of clothing and in my mind, part of the same overarching issue.
This can become very internalized and personal too. My sister has a child with special needs. Often she compares her difficulties with the situation, to the difficulties other parents of special needs kids deal with. It is always a bad idea. She will get it in her head that because someone has a more difficult situation, she has no right to feel a struggle with her own. As if someone else having a bigger problem means hers just doesn't matter. It can be hard to remind her sometimes that this isn't the case, and her difficulties and struggles are just as valid as anyone else's. That being said, she is a wonderful mom and her daughter is a ray of frikkin sunshine! I love the crap out of both of them! :)
Everyone can have their own worries relative to their own lives, it's the old childhood thing of "mum, it's not my fault there are children starving in Africa, as sad as it is I still don't like sprouts".
This reminds me of the 'all lives matter' response to the Black Lives Matter movement. It's like when someone is doing a 5K for breast cancer and people are like, 'but there's also cervical cancer!' Some folks miss the point of things because they're too busy policing the worda of others.
Also know as "the strategy that misoginistic people use to attack womens rights". When a feminist states a problem derived of sexism (lets say sexual harassment at work) suddenly all of them care about "much bigger problems", like the militar draft or circumcision. Which are never supported by feminists anyway.
Also used to dismiss someone's emotional pain as in: everyone has problems, pull your self together. Anyone ever got over a problem because someone said this to them? Yet it is said often. (not to be confused with helping others while you are in pain, which might help build perspective, might help you feel useful and might bring you in to contact with people who will help you - but trivialising someone else's problem because other people cope with worse makes no sense)
According to Highline College, the steps of the scientific method are something like this:
- Make an observation or observations;
- Form a hypothesis — a tentative description of what's been observed, and make predictions based on that hypothesis;
- Test the hypothesis and predictions in an experiment that can be reproduced;
- Analyze the data and draw conclusions; accept or reject the hypothesis or modify the hypothesis if necessary;
- Reproduce the experiment until there are no discrepancies between observations and theory.
Few years back, had been promoted to low lvl manager and was going nuts, trying to fix every problem so as to be well evaluated. One long time high lvl manager saw me once and said: "if we solve every problem we will not be needed to come to work tomorrow".
Imo there's a yes and a no to this, but it also depends where you're working. Yes you should solve problems as best as you can, but no you should not overwork yourself, you are not the only one who can solve these problems and there is no way you could do it by yourself. The high level manager is correct too, but also keep in mind there's a big difference between "not solving every problem immediately" and "intentionally creating problems to create business"
Load More Replies...I have observed it but never had the words to describe it. This is a weird way to live as a human because the problems that they are preserving are destroying us.
This explains why there are millions more medical treatments than actual cures.
https://www.change.org/p/olivier-v%C3%A9ran-faire-stopper-les-contentions-en-psychiatrie-ainsi-que-le-surdosage-medicamenteux?redirect=false ------- these "treatments worsen the conditions SO there can be even more """cures""" :(
Load More Replies...It frustrates me that we would not then move on to other problems that can be solved. And surely maintenance is an issue that can be addressed?
This is the problem for Finnish war veteran societies. They are wealthy and sitting in their boards is a prestige, but there are only and handful of veterans left because the last war ended at 1944. Now the organizations have to either dissolve themselves or re-invent themselves to support newer veterans from Peace corps etc.
like how the tax preparation service companies are keeping the government/IRS lobbied so that we don't switch to automatic tax returns (which would be feasible for like 60-70% of the population of tax payers), just so we can keep giving them money to do redundant paperwork every year
Like the Pepsi bottling company wanting to control ocean plastics. Talapia doesn't taste the same without them good ol plastic flakes
It took me until 50, working full time and going to school, failing, before I finally earned my doctorate. This is going on my wall.
Load More Replies...Most often I'll see some crank bringing in someone with a degree to support their views -- but their crank science is about physics and they're quoting some crazy pharmacist. That sort of thing. But of course you can have crazy people in every field...as well as established cliques who resist new evidence and better hypotheses because it diminishes their own influence.
The downside of this one is it allows uneducated people to maintain that their (less informed) opinion is just as valid as one from someone with considerably more education. No, PhD's aren't always right, but in their field their opinion is probably better informed than yours.
"more skilled at being wrong" I LOVE that! And several PhD/experts agree with me LOL
Being more skilled at being wrong does make a good PhD. Good science is trying to remain objective (all bias cannot be completely eliminated) and do experiments to test an idea. 99.99999999999999999% of all ideas are wrong in some way. Every idea we've ever had was disproved at some point and replace with a better one. A good scientist uses their objectively wrong results and tries again. A bad scientist changes results to look like they are right. Its by being wrong 999 times that allows you to finally be right once. There's a reason we have drug trials, wind tunnels, probability, and scientists even exist. Today they announced that an experiment with an atomic clock proved Einstein's theory of relativity regarding time dilation is true. For the last 116 years, every experiment has been wrong because it could not measure what it was supposed to. Last week, an Indian experiment disproved a the realism portion of his theory. Truth is found by figuring out how we are wrong.
Not true for actual hard science PhDs, like in maths for instance.
Someone once told me that PHD stands for "Piled Higher and Deeper".
More to the function of academic research, that 'oppositional' schema is how ideas are tested and verified. If you come up with something seemingly brilliant, people are going to try and poke a bunch of holes in it - if they can't, your findings become much more certain. If they can, they become famous (bonus) and get the target put on their findings, at which now other people will take aim. But of course, expertise doesn't make one infallible (argument from authority is itself a fallacy) it just makes someone more likely to be right and, if right, more likely that their process and methodology was sound. Anyone can guess the answer of a complex formula and get it right by random chance while a Ph.D. who does the work gets it wrong - but that one right answer wouldn't make Rando McGuessingguy a better mathematician.
"Replication of methods and results is my favorite step in the scientific method," Moshe Pritsker, a former post-doctoral researcher at Harvard Medical School and CEO of JoVE, also told Live Science.
"The reproducibility of published experiments is the foundation of science. No reproducibility — no science."
I feel like this text is a little bit reductive and that there's a lot more than just "noise" and "learning".
Load More Replies...Case in point, I guess, because this is such BS, especially if you're selective about what you look at. Spending time on the internet does not automatically make you dumber. Also, not everything has to be educational. Resting and entertaining your brain is important, too
I like how you said it :) I actually don't entertain myself but my brain
Load More Replies...Is stupider a word now? My elementary teachers always said it was more stupid. Did they finally just give the go ahead on combining them like the word smarter? Regardless, the word "stupider" always comes off sounding... dumb, probably because my teachers made such a big deal about not saying it.
"Irregardless" but yes there was a summit and they adopted the change via aclaim.
Load More Replies...Sure. The best and worst thing to happen to the internet was all the plebs accepting it and participating. Now we simultaneously have incredible innovations/technologies/convenience, but also infinite stupidity from and consumed by every rando with a keyboard. People keep consuming junk because that's what they seek. The internet has a wealth of educational and rewarding content. Like a well balanced diet, people need to control themselves.
Nope. Haven’t watched national news on any channel for two years. Much better attitude.
Yes, we're finding that out now, to our great cost. The psychological harm that would have to be done for people to admit "He DIDN'T make America great again; he only passed one piece of legislation (tax cuts) which increased the debt and deficit astonishingly, and there's increasing evidence he is a white supremacist and wannabe-autocrat who lies endlessly and is actually guilty of everything he has accused others of" is massive, and people want to avoid it, so they keep defending him. Those who follow this comment with remarks like "living rent free in your head" will prove my point ;)
Video evidence of him saying the n-word! https://youtu.be/J5mqIUXppVY
Load More Replies...Which is why most of us seek sources/people that agree with what we already think, and why data mining internet companies present us with material that fits our profiles. So while I may read my facts and think that anti-vaxxers are nuts, the anti-vaxxers are reading their facts (for them, anyway), and are getting an entirely different content than I am.
Facts are not a matter of opinion. Calling facts "my facts" only lends credibility to people who have none.
Load More Replies...I've heard that people who recovered from deep beliefs said it wasn't some grate argument that changed their minds, but a bunch of tiny cracks. Don't try to win an argument with someone-- just get them to question one of their bricks. Put a tiny crack in it.
That’s what the Republican Party is saying about Donald… it’s easier to live with the AH than to go against him.
It is more important to stay in power than adhere to any kind of principle.
Load More Replies...Video evidence of him saying the n-word! https://youtu.be/J5mqIUXppVY
It can depend on your culture also though -- Certainly I'm wrong about several facts related to gravity but that doesn't mean I would suddenly stop believing gravity is a real phenomenon just because I found out one of the facts I believed turned out to be wrong. Famously in WWII Americans found out that in Japanese culture their soldiers' belief systems could be pretty brittle -- all they had to do with a prisoner is prove that one single fact they believed about their emperor or whatnot was untrue, and their entire belief system would apparently come crashing down and they would just start babbling out whatever information the Americans asked for.
First off, gravity isn't a matter of opinion, though. But let's say it isn't actually scientifically proven, and we were only educated to believe that it is. Then one day it turns out (with actual evidence) that each thing on earth has a spirit holding on to it and keeping it from floating away. Wouldn't finding that out shatter your very faith in science?
Load More Replies...Am I unique? My opinions on absolutely everything have evolved as situations change, as my education expanded, as I traveled, As I matured and began to recognize myself above what I was taught and prioritize my own observations. They still aren't written in stone, I wouldn't say in flux, but definitely pliable. The older you get, the more you see, the more you meet and the wiser you because.
A good example in real life is Leah Remini. Her whole life was built up around Scientology and when she finally was able to admit the bottom bricks were crap everything came tumbling down and she basically had to restart so much of her life over again! Thankfully her husband and mom joined her and they were able to lean on eachother for support.
I would argue that people make their avatar based on the personality they want to have/show.
I agree. But I would hope the original statement is based on a study where people are randomly assigned an avatar, then their behaviour assessed.
Load More Replies...Absolutely. We all change personalities all the time. For instance, my mum has a slightly posh 'telephone voice' that she puts on whenever she answers the phone. She takes it up a level when she's on a work call. And drops it completely with friends and family. That's a very 'face value' example but it runs deeper. The work persona, the 'with friends' persona, the 'with friends from work' persona etc.
im a tiger! roar *continues singing katy perry*
Load More Replies...My avatar is a huge, faceless robot that punches monsters in the face, and now everything makes sense.
Not exactly the same as discussed but related, I would always have a personality similar to whoever I was hanging out with the most for a few hours. Not drastic, like, I didn't suddenly want to punch people because a friend got into a lot of fights, but I might become a bit more defensive if I was around someone who didn't like getting called out.
Is the separation via virtual space equeal to the seperation via alcohol (or alternative recreational medication)? We become more of who we truly are when the veil of social diplomacy erodes?
Though i think it is logic that we kinda play characters to fit social situations and this is called having a colorful personality, i would note that in this instance a person pics the character. I think an avatar in such cases is rather what we would like to be.
If feel that the version of myself that I present online is a more authentic version of myself.
Finding genuine people is so hard. The vast majority are constantly playing a character to be liked by those they're surrounded by. There are times to put on a mask, but there are more times to be true to your values. Stop trying to be liked and you'll find out who truly likes you and share values.
The backbone of the scientific method is generating and testing a hypothesis. After an idea has been confirmed over many experiments, it can be called a scientific theory. While a theory explains a phenomenon, a scientific law provides a description of a phenomenon, according to The University of Waikato. Take the law of conservation of energy, for example. It is the first law of thermodynamics and says that energy can neither be created nor destroyed.
A law describes an observed phenomenon, but it doesn't explain why the phenomenon exists or what causes it. "In science, laws are a starting place," said Peter Coppinger, an associate professor of biology and biomedical engineering at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. "From there, scientists can then ask the questions, 'Why and how?'"
If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed and if you read the newspaper you are misinformed. - Mark Twain
Media literacy and the loss of the Fairness Doctrine are a big problem in the US
People get upset about "the media's agenda" but guess what--media is a product and we are consumers. Most of "the media" is just looking to feed the demand of its consumers. We ARE the media.
Like religious leaders becoming multimillionaires while taking the last dollar from little old ladies
I agree this happens, especially in research. Example: the great saccharin cancer scare was based on using the rat model. The rats used are genetically bred to develop cancer. The rats were fed the equivalent per their body weight to humans a18 wheeler tractor trailer FULL of saccharin. Hmmmm? You sure the rats didn’t develop other diseases too?
Knowing this makes me think i should really stop reading Mainstream media and find some impopulair site or stick to wikipedia.
I suspect Wikipedia isn't much better because "anyone can edit" and guess where they get their sources...
Load More Replies...You know honey, white, but not eggshell, but not cream either. More of an ecru-bone I think! This sentence is guaranteed to start an argument between almost any two people in the paint department. I'm being a little genderist here but I firmly believe there are minute distinctions in colours that some gentlemen can't perceive that most ladies can.
Load More Replies...Sometimes it is not so important which choice is made, but that a choice is made. Drive through a desert on a lonely track and come to a 'Y' junction branching into two similar tracks and no sign post. In the absence of further information it is more important to go left or right and not just sit there deciding and starving to death.
This is easily solved by the coin-flip experiment, whereby a subject flips a coin and moves on with their life.
If I remember correctly, it wasn't that people wanted to criticise, it was that they couldn't stand letting a false statement stand uncorrected. It's the need to go "I think you'll find.." which isn't quite the same at criticism (and a concept I do realize I've just demonstrated)
That is exactly right. I love that people attempt debate with this too- ultimately proving your point.
This works outside the internet, too. When I try to get data from people to write up reports, manuals, etc, I often get "I'm too busy to answer you," and the like. But speculate on what it really is and send it for review and they'll correct everything instantly. Can make you look "stupid" but it gets the job done.
People love getting self-worth from proving people wrong, no matter what. It's why I've had tourists to my city come to my work, a tourist attraction, and argue with me about something relating to my city. Like bruh, I've lived here my whole life and it's my job to know about this place, you just arrived here yesterday.
An old, but hilarious and memorable article about how this plays out on Fox News, who likes to title every story with "WAR ON [anything favorable to the audience]." https://www.cracked.com/blog/the-8-greatest-wars-ever-fought-by-fox-news
What's with Americans and pulling politics into everything? This comment thread is... well, nvm.
This is what it's like living here. Constant bickering. Please help.
Load More Replies...This is the best way someone has ever described influencer culture.
Aztec priests finally sacrificed enough people for there to be enough rain to grow enough food, them the Spanish Conquistadors relieved them of their gold.
Video evidence of him saying the n-word! https://youtu.be/J5mqIUXppVY
Laws are usually considered to be without exception, though some get modified over time if further testing finds discrepancies. For instance, Newton's laws of motion describe everything we've observed in the macroscopic world, but they break down at the subatomic level.
But this does not mean theories are meaningless. For a hypothesis to become a theory, scientists have to conduct rigorous testing, typically across multiple disciplines. Saying something is "just a theory" can be misleading as the scientific definition of "theory" and the layperson's understanding of it can be very different. To most people, a theory is a hunch but in science, it's the framework for observations and facts.
As a previous journalist I always took "burying the lede" as a criticism that you missed the real story in your story and need to rethink it. Outside of organizations who are only interested in propaganda (Fox News) most journalists I know would be ashamed, and have no motivation, to do this purposely.
I read that truly objective journalism has been on the decline for decades and that virtually every bit of news is tinged by the journalist‘s view. This is dangerous, of course - as much as it is human. I wonder whether it’s somehow linked to the need to correct others?
Load More Replies...My grandpa was a newspaper editor and he always said if the headline asks a question (ie "Is chicken bad for your children?"), the answer will be "NO" and will be in the last paragraph. If the answer was yes, the headline would have stated it as a fact ("Chicken is bad for your children").
Occasionally I see this and I think it's a cheeky yet muted way of sneaking a story in, which relies on the audience to read between the lines whilst the reporter does their best job of drawing those lines. Think of the above as "Tell me the US has insane military spending without telling me the US has insane military spending." A recent example was the BBC reporting on Matt Hancock. The entire story was about how public and government had lost confidence in this health minister for breaching his own COVID guidelines regarding social distancing. The breach was that he kissed and embraced a coworker, with no mention of the fact that he's married, she's married, attractive, and also his own aide whom he secretly hired with little qualification or experience in government or health. As if the journalist was coyly saying, "Affair? What affair? Noooooo, I'm not a gossip columnist, just talking about government here! 🙃"
I saw in my Facebook feed a headline by Breitbart: "Spotify Dumps Neil Young". I almost pity the fools who read that website.
Neil Young gave Spotify a choice: keep my music or keep Joe Rogan. Spotify kept Joe Rogan.
Load More Replies...The headline is not wrong. That chart shows a steady increase for China. We could also share Russia has decreased their military spending, and it be correct according to this chart. However... The headline also served and succeeded at its other purpose: took my attention away (very briefly) from the US line. This seriously reminds of the exams we'd get in public school. Study the chart, makes some inferences and answer the questions.
Right?! The bigger headline is how much more other countries spend in comparison
It made me so upset in the Marines, I gave up on writing. I was a Combat Correspondent and Media Chief for the base in Public Affairs. I would interview people (our unit was in the Battle of Fallujah....I would write gruesome details that would put the reader right by the Marines' or especially the Corpsman's side)...Anyway, I was told by my major that although heartbreaking and incredible....it won't fit because there are too many military wives, family and whatnot who read their publication. No need to upset them. I felt destroyed because one particular Corpsman didn't talk to anyone...I got him to open up, told me horror that I wrote...and the next week it was cut down to, "Yeah it was tough, but we all hung together..." Then they print it with my name on it. ...still haunts me, what that poor corpsman must have thought. He finally opened up. Finally gave his story. Read it, and essentially looks like I screwed him over. That hurts. His story should have been printed. Propaganda.
Look at CNN taking a nosedive in credibility. They've misled and outright lied, only to have to admit later (very quietly) that they were wrong. They will sit there and let a guest spout off refuted lies but not correct them- thereby letting the lies continue. Look at CNN's and MSNBC's ratings. The public has no faith in what they are peddling.
This doesn't work on Deborah! I got her to do me a favour once, now the resentment levels are through the roof!
This level of dislike can only mean that they are hugely attracted to you and have not yet figured it out themselves. Source: HOLLYWOOD.
Load More Replies...I use this trick in retail every day:"would you do me a favor and give me that name one more time?" "Hey, thanks so much for your patience, would you just do me a quick favor and enter your rewards number if you have one?" Works wonders to diffuse angry/upset people. Also asking questions of any sort moves people from an emotional frame of mind to a rational one and they'll calm down. The questions literally don't matter, just asking is enough.
Nah! Get someone who dislikes you to do you a favour and they figure you owe them. ANd the favour you owe them is always waaay bigger than what they did for you.
In that case, my half sister must absolutely hate everyone. O.o
Load More Replies...Hm... I don't think this would work on me: first I'm always helpful and second I rarely dislike someone, but if so, doing them a favour wouldn't help, only them being nice would?
And it has to start off with a small favor, like asking to borrow a pen, which you can't really say no to without looking like a jerk. Then over time you can start asking for bigger favors and they'll still agree.
This doesn't work. My dad lives in my house, I ask very little of him, he pays minimal rent, and everything I ask something of him, all I get is a "what?!" no matter how many spiders he helps leave my house... 🤷🏻♀️
You need to openly praise the work he does in front of others- primarily adults. Then remind him occasionally what a valued person he is in YOUR daily structure. YOU ARE THE LEADER NOW or adult. Manipulate him with verbal rewards. Same way he did you as a child or young person. Don’t forget open praise and an occasional happy.
Load More Replies...Tribalism is less dangerous if people also develop some self-awareness. The ability to self-examine and say "I may not be being consistent here" or "If I believe X (which I like) then logically that leads to Y (which I don't like at all) but the two are bound together so I can't just pick X and ignore Y" is absolutely crucial to being balanced but a lot of people do not seem to be able to be self-aware at all.
And if the governing principle of their actions is peace.
Load More Replies...Um, did we evolve to BE tribal or did we evolve BECAUSE we were tribal and now it's time to shed that characteristic?
I heard this about moths and that back before electric lights they flew in steady, calm patterns. I’m sure that flames threw them off and all, but man we messed up their calm and peaceful existence by accident in that department.
For aeons, we didn't have a clue what the world around us meant, hence all religious feeling of any kind, despite now having most of the answers.
Partly true. We still have only a mere, tiny, sliver of the answers. The Brain, The Ocean, and Space are largely yet unexplored, and not nearly 'most' of what has been is understood.
Load More Replies...How could creationism be more "unusual"than believing in the big bang? Both require leaps of faith and no one was around to define what was usual.
By this logic, Kennedy was assassinated by a lone gunmen who shot a magic bullet.
Probably all of us know someone who constantly questions and challenges everything they see and hear. No matter how much evidence is in front of them.
"The quality of cynicism, in its extreme, can be one component of the personality trait known as Machiavellianism," Susan Krauss Whitbourne, a professor emerita of psychological and brain sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, wrote in Psychology Today. "You might already know what this quality is just by the term alone, but its formal definition includes not just a tendency to manipulate and exploit others, but also a deeply-held belief that others are, as the saying goes, 'out to get them.'"
I want to upvote this entry but of course they're all numbered so I can't! This is so important. My favorite example of this right now is climate change. We have SO MANY SOLUTIONS and around 25% of emissions reductions can be achieved at the normal household level. And yet there are so many people saying "Oh, it's all big business, it's out of our hands, we're doomed" etc. We are not doomed. Things are bad but you CAN take action. Top thing you can do: 1. Throw away less food. Next best: 2. Eat less meat (particularly beef). Those are ACHIEVABLE. Problem-solving FTW! 🙂
I hear what you're saying, KatHat, and I certainly do my part. But then I read about planes flying empty during the pandemic to keep their gates at the airports and I can't help but go "why the f**k do I even bother?"
Load More Replies...It seems many are missing the point here. Example "climate change" is a package of smaller problems. Then we assume it is because of X, Y, and Z. X and Z are factual problems and Y, it is an assumption to connect X and Z. In the example of "climate change" just stop calling it that. Call.out the specific problem you want to address. There is no Climate Change. There are hundreds of little problems that need to be addressed. Climate Change is a bundle of the small problems plus a bunch of b******t like a Cable company bundle. You want internet. But it is cheaper to buy phone, internet, cable, etc... In one big bundle you don't need.
Your lizard brain wants you to just survive in the short term (fight, flight, feed, freeze, fear, fornication) and doesn't know the long term exists. You hear the wolves howling every night so you don't go into the woods to chop firewood. Maybe the wolves will go away tonight. A month later you freeze to death when 4 feet of snow falls and you can't reach the woods to chop more.
Load More Replies...Don't forget that people will make bad decisions that they know mean their future self will suffer...because they don't even have empathy for their future selves.
This would be student loans. Future self believed in Rosy future or opposite, I would be dead and wouldn't have to repay..... Neither has happened, Momma always had the best advice, You made your bed now you have to lie in it thorns and all.
Sounds kinda like religious education. Make sacrifices in your life. Minor inconveniences are better for you in the long run.
To be fair, he's only saying to do this when the options seem otherwise equal.
Load More Replies...If I have two chores, I try to do the worst/hardest/most difficult one first. That way I have the easy one later when I'm more tired.
Ding! Ding! The reason I've been saying shareholders, and not capitalism, is the problem with medical prices. Capitalism would enforce the route with the highest profits (which could be decades away and will require the company to be a good citizen), shareholders enforce the route with the most profits NOW with no regards for how it hurts the company, the community or long-term profits.
This is actually the most helpful one for me because I've already taken the more difficult choice by quitting my safe and easy job and agreeing to move to another city. Staying at this job would have been the safer choice, but I want more from life.
Hence the attitude toward climate change for the past 20 years
Some of my teachers uses to tell us to find someone who can sit with us so that we can explain the things we learnt that day. Or at least sir a doll or something in front of us and teach it. I have subjected my mom to a lot of my "teaching" over the years and still do. She studied commerce and I'm a science student so that makes it hard sometimes but I think she understands some of the stuff I talk about. And it makes me really happy when she does
Came to the comments to say this! (For those not in the know, it's a technical-person thing where explaining an issue to someone will often cause you to discover the problem. That's because you need to fill in many more details and question all your assumptions when explaining. And it works nearly as well to just explain to a plastic duck as to a co-worker...)
Load More Replies...The single most important indicator of the truth of this is the fact that general knowledge and literacy have declined and given way to very insular skills - while we downsize the amount of written work at schools. Lots of multiple choice, of fill in the gap, of matching pictures with pre-written sentences. Our classrooms are much too full, it takes a long time for students to grapple with rephrasing what they understood and write it down - and it’s a helluva lot of work to pore over it, evaluate and correct it. Smaller groups of learners are essential for a more thorough learning experience.
in university, i volunteered to tutor some of the other students because i had a decent handle on the material. My grades got way better after i started tutoring, i'm sure mostly because i had to explain things to others and that really made me understand it better.
That's why college and private school taught me to always take notes on our reading assignments
I love this idea. I'm going to try applying it more. It will hep me practise explaining things as well because I'm usually awful at it!
Every school day I asked my kids if they learned something new in school and what was it. Then I listened and asked clarification questions.
If you grew up in Germany after the war and before 1989, you know how hard the Cold War was fought in our heads. Both, West and East have constantly been trying to picture each other as the villain.
"In research on the underlying motivation of the Machiavellian, TU Dorman University's Christian Blötner and Sebastian Bergold proposed that what they call 'avoidance' motivation leads these individuals to experience a deep sense of distrust and highly 'negative views of human nature," Whitbourne explained.
But not all cynics would qualify as people high on this overall trait of Machiavellianism. "It's possible that the very skeptical have simply developed a so-called 'cognitive style,' or analytical type of mindset that causes them to look at situations from all possible angles."
For most of humanity's existence, we made most of our judgements on what we could see. Our visual range was our limit for making decisions and our eyes were how we got that information. We didn't ask our eyes to do it - they just do. That sight has now been extended through the internet. We can now make real time decisions using data our tools find for us without us acting. A farmer 120 years ago made a choice of what to wear that day based on looking out the window. You make that choice by having your phone tell you, without you asking, its going to snow 8-12" in 8 hours. Our senses are no longer limited to what we can see or hear out our front door. They've been extended so we can now watch a bomb explode 4000 miles away live or decide to buy something because you see 3 million people are doing the same thing RIGHT NOW. The crypto dealer has replaced the shuckster with the pea under the walnut because they've learned to manipulate your new senses like the pea guy did your sight.
Load More Replies...Vultures feed on the dead. This is more like a Japanese meal of live monkey brains.
Our scope is no longer localized, it's been broadened by phones. Like your brain has thoughts or reactions, your phone has notifications that demand attention and can affect you internally through emotion or knowledge. We even store memories and information in our phones. I get it.
I think this concept is lost on younger people b/c this is how they manage their info/phone time. This is now normal. Phones and computers have become sensory input devices but ultimately our brains are our processing units... If they have been programmed correctly.
can't really agree here...our senses capture information, faster that we can deal with. so whatever we understand is because of culture...we don't capture any information trough our technology, but trough our culture....all information we get trough technology has been process by the cultural values of the users
I would say devices and sensors are extending our ability to sense the world around us but not yet developed to the extent where we may interpret and protect ourselves from that which may inflict harm. It is still external even if it feels intimate.
Or simply wait the 48 hours after forming opinions and beliefs before voicing them?
Yeah but often we give our opinions in the middle of arguments which makes it pointless to wait for two days before saying something.
Load More Replies...I learned a long time ago that every time I wanted to write something when I was mad, or a complaint, or present a problem, I would send the email to myself. The next day I would read it as though it were directed at me and then edit it so I didn't hate the writer. It's been working well for me for a while.
That's a silly name for the rule. It should be called the shopping-cat rule. The principle of leaving something in your online shopping cart for 48 hours...
I don't allow myself to go on FB or reply to text messages in the first hour of being awake, I'm quite unreasonable.
Maybe then there wouldn't be a daily apology from some celebrity who didn't think before speaking
mmm...is not really a statement that applies well in life...modern behavioural science show that we make decision very fast and subconsciously, most times before you even understand what is going on, your mind is ready made, and it lets you know after. we just need to com up with argument to support it....ever buy something you though you needed, and results that you didn't, but will spend a lot of time coming up with reassons why it was right to buy it?
I disagree. It's harder to learn whether it's defensible or not if you don't try to defend it. Just don't double down on things or be unwilling to change your mind with further input.
Load More Replies...Imagine if somebody set out to write a song all about irony. Imagine if that song didn't contain a single example of irony. And it was titled 'Ironic'. Isn't that ironic? Maybe Alanis was playing the long game all along.
'And isn't it mildly irritating - don't you think?'
Load More Replies...I disagree. For example, graphs A and B could be of the same data but viewed from different axes. Likewise, C could be the same data, but more accurately shown.
but accuracy does not account for the mental process to interpret it. The more complex the visualization of the data we espend more effort in understanding it, than interpret it
Load More Replies...There's more than one side to this. Graph A tells a clear story, a straight line, an obvious message. Graphs B and C show less and less correlation as data is added. 1) If added data is relevant and important, then it becomes more accurate, but more complex and harder to communicate (Ex: climate change, which is multi-faceted, not simply cured by buying an economy car), and therefore it becomes more difficult to make a valid point (it IS actually beneficial to buy an economy car). 2) If additional data is NOT relevant, then your final data just clouds the correlation of the original data and loses its punch (Ex: Strong correlation between smoking and cancer, but then you add information about every chemical ever exposed to every test subject.). 3) In another case, initial data is misleading and the additional data is needed to prove that these were not "meaningful associations" in the first place (Ex: Google "spurious correlations").
I wish I could upvote you more than once. Very insightful comments on the original post.
Load More Replies...This is the reason that people think that they can make sense of the stars and constellations. They are so far away that they seem to be painted on a 2D surface with some distinct shapes (like The Big Dipper). However, the stars not only have immense differences in distance from us, but we are seeing them at vastly different periods. Those shapes are merely a 2D projection of a vastly different 3D world, and are a 0 dimensional projection of 1 dimensional space.
This falls apart if the data doesn't show patterns until you add the third dimension. You * could * generalize the way you did, but it is very dependent on the nature of the data. For example, what if the three colors appeared the same in some measurement at similar temperatures, but only at vary different pressures. The graphs would be less insightful until you got to the third dimension of adding pressure data.
"Indeed, you might argue that some form of cynicism is adaptive," Whitbourne said. "Think about the highly gullible people you know who are easily swayed by whatever winds might be sweeping over the media landscape. Not only could they put themselves at risk for being swindled by the ads that fund the media landscape, but they can also be led to accept faulty information that puts their health and well-being in jeopardy. Maybe it is better to think twice or perhaps three times before rushing into such a poor decision."
I've also heard this argument misapplied to a degree. If you have someone who is a constant, selfish, lying manipulator, and that person seems to come up with a good idea, it's time to examine that idea very closely. Not because that person couldn't possibly suggest something helpful and good, but because of the high likelihood that they're presenting misleading facts along with it, or misrepresenting what the effects will be, because you know the person must have a selfish agenda behind the idea or they would never ever bring it up.
I've seen this every time one of those on-the-street comedic presenters asks people what they think of a plan by Trump and when they say it's great, tell them it's Obama's.
Wouldn't that example mean we judge a message by its perceived origin, not the messenger?
Whenever my mom tells me some shocking news she learned from F'book, I assume it's not true.
Its in the name "new". You don't report the corn is still growing. You report the new thing - the hail crushed some of it. The next day that hail is no longer new so you report how many people will starve. It distorts the reality that there's another 24 million acres of corn that didn't get hit and there's a chance farmer Bob will have a bumper crop. The news is reporting what has changed and expect us to put it into perspective. Sometimes we don't have enough of the "old" to understand what the "new" means.
When looking back, after all the news you read and watched, it's crazy how little of that you remember; what seems like bits and pieces are just the aftermath of the big media storm surrounding what it is you remember.
In customer service, people are considerably more likely to complain than compliment. Its when things dont go right that people get upset and remember.
ive never viewed anyone as having a fixed personality. if you asked me to name 3 or more personality traits of my best friend, or asked me to tell you what theyre like or what theyd do in a situation, i wouldnt be able to answer. most likely id sit there for 2+ minutes and come up with "oh theyre cool"
Ah, so you have a fluid enough mind to understand them?
Load More Replies...In other words, I've been a b***h to a lot of undeserving people :-(
I'm the other way around. I know myself well enough to know that when I do wrong, I had no real excuse. I don't know others as well as I know myself. Who knows what their day has been like, what their childhood was like, what personal battles they're currently fighting?
I view myself as having changing personality but others fixed, that's right
The biases of the measurer may make a difference, but not always in the same way and sometimes lead to contrary results.
In fact, knowing why some people believe in unsubstantiated claims and why misinformation guides their actions can be a valuable tool for resisting these traps. If you question loud phrases, you aren't automatically a cynic. Maybe you're just (a very healthy) skeptic.
Just another way that shows that eyewitnesses are one of the least reliable factors in determining guilt.
And it shows other items on this list to be true and meaningful: the tendency to copy others in strange new situations and the fact that hardly any reports of factual events are relayed in objective language.
Load More Replies...That graph is a good example of how to present misleading data. The difference between the higest (41) and lowest (32) estimate is less than 25%, but by starting the X-axis at 30 makes it look more than 80%.
You don't remember the actual event. What you remember is the last time you recalled and related that memory. Like a game of Telephone, memories change over time.
You change it enough and you've managed to gaslight yourself.
Load More Replies...Right, because bumping shoulders would surely be softer than if you hit my shoulder. I think I even mixed them up in my head when reading the graph (confirmation bias maybe)
Load More Replies...Memories are formed again by your brain when accessed, and very susceptible to this effect.
This reminds me of the "Challenger" experiment. Researchers interviewed people about what they were doing when they first heard about the Challenger space shuttle explosion. Years later, they asked the same people about what they recalled about the tragedy, and none of them remembered it in the same way. "Flashbulb" memories are never reliable.
Load More Replies...jeez the "contact" was at 32 speed wow that's fast (also to whoever made this graph please add labels)
The President would outsource the kill and avoid confronting reality personally.
It would be good if leaders had to kill themselves to launch a nuclear strike. If it was really worth it, they’d make the sacrifice.
I disagree.. I encourage you to think harder about this... Most people who are leaders are narcissistic on some level. So the odds of them killing themselves for the greater good would be much lower, not higher. even if the situation called for it.
Load More Replies...I remember an old (U.S.) TV commercial about a "war" being the leaders of the two countries being the ones to actually fistfight. Since then, I've noticed that it's usually the case that the ones most likely to call for physical force are the ones LEAST likely to be the ones to implement it (and face the direct and immediate resistance).
I think that would only work if the volunteer was someone the president knew and liked.
That just increases motive for assissantion leading to unrest and potential power vacuums.
Load More Replies...This seems very common with weapons, the easier they are to use, and the further away you can be from the victim, the easier it is to "pull the trigger". That's why in court they look at the type of weapon used to determine if it was in cold blood or crime of passion.
And that's how you know a public person is talking BS when they bring up the "American People".
just like how most politicians have shifted to taking away our freedoms/rights during this pandemic, because they need to give us a solution. The power gains from perceived help/protection is just as egregious as representing a higher authority.
You're in this horrific situation because duh the Bible. It is supposed to be this way. God said in the Bible you might get into heaven if you just endure this suffering and make me rich. But wait, wait, wait DO NOT learn how to read. I'll have to come up with something else then 😶
Now you'll have to forgive me, because I'm distanced from the situation and may sorely not know what I'm talking about, but I thought there were a lot of people that agreed with Trudeau? It's just that the people who disagree are much much louder.
Load More Replies...This is how the GOP gets away with absolutely everything, it found the ONE thing that a large group of people find completely intolerable--abortion--and attached themselves to that.
This is basically what Diogenes the Cynic said. You have to get outside of your society's norms to see your society as it is.
Step outside the box. Smash it. Take everything with a pinch of salt. Don't judge a book by it's cover.......
Load More Replies...Netflix top 10 list and ‘Trending’ sections tell me what I don’t care to watch. My newest pet peeve is the word “trending”. Ugh, I hate it
See also: "Sugar makes kids hyperactive", and the myths surrounding MSG.
And whatever else the health faddists are saying is bad for you.
Load More Replies...I remember these kids going around malls preaching about the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide. Some people were getting really freaked out. It was an experiment on suggestability. Just so no one worries dihydrogen monoxide = h2o
Now, I'm not going to say anything negative about the vaccine, but, how do you "meta-analyze" if the symptoms are due to reverse placebo or not? I get that you can prove it exists (ignoring the ethicality of "making people sick), but how do you link it to a specific thing that reasonably might have said side effects?
I don't know if that's A good example. My son and I did get sick from the 2nd covid shot. I am still a supporter of it.
Hang on, I'd like some elaboration on this, I feel like there's a number of things you could be trying to say.
Load More Replies...Describing Zersetzung like this, would be like describing the Hindenburg disaster as 'an inconveniently timed surprise campfire'. It was systematic deconstruction of people's lives to prevent them from any rebellion against the state - including ruining their careers, their home life, separating them from their loved ones, their children. It was targeting the human soul, it wasn't an April Fool's prank.
A good example of gaslighting is in a Star Tell TNG episode where Picard is tortured by someone who repeatedly tells him there are four lights shining when there are three. By the end of the episode, he begins to see four lights.
true, but gaslighting in a relationship isn't necessarily making them think they're insane, it's just making them feel that their perception of something is inaccurate, even if they were sure of it before.
I mean, my impression isn't that, in it's current form, that it's just lying, but specifically that it does so in a way that causes a person to doubt or change something that they previously believed to be fact, most frequently by pure repetition. I didn't think the sanity part came into it. (Also was Gaslight actually the name of the piece? I couldn't remember but thought it was something else)
I hate how over-used and abused this word is these days. Can people just stop using words they don't know the meaning of? There is no shame in not knowing something; just don't pretend that you do. Look it up instead, learn something, then use it. I do it all the time and I get to learn new and interesting words. I love it!
Gaslighting is also used to make someone's doubt their own judgements, feelings, capabilities, etc. not only sanity
Using “literally” hyperbolically is one thing, but suggesting that gaslighting doesn’t mean gaslighting is a little too meta for me.
Load More Replies...Like the Kanye stuff he does non stop all day. I don't follow anyone famous on Instagram but the news sure loves to cover all his dumb posts. Can't escape it.
But he just wants to be left alone. Of course he also wants his almost ex wife back, until tomorrow when he just wants to fling some more abuse at her. Then he wants to be left alone again.
Load More Replies...This is why I don't jump in to comment on every topic, every day. Think, then act.
There's a rule for that I think. Something about a fool who thinks he is superior because he speaks so quickly....
Load More Replies...This is way longer than the seven minutes advertised but I'll let it slide because it's quite interesting.
That's because we are really stopping and thinking about these rather than skimming lol
Load More Replies...I myself am autistic, classify black and white and after being betrayed by words need behavioural proof for anything and everything now. It's a horrendous state of being to be trapped in and also the complete opposite of this... anyone else out there with me?! Or is it just me?... :(
I don't know how to edit... *sp in first line should be classically
Load More Replies...If it's easier to make yourself look good on social, why does Facebook make me think people are getting worse and worse by the minute?
Because the reverse side of things is anonymity. If you're hiding behind an online name and profile picture, you don't end up being held personally accountable for what you say.
Load More Replies...One spontaneous or stupid post online can ruin a person despite years of acting as a good person because of this phenomenon.
Love this one. You could build a house for the homeless but still be judged harshly for your views online.
I am so glad I fulfilled my biological imperative already. Now I don't have to impress anybody.
Ah but you do. Evolutionary fitness is measured by how many grandkids you can have versus others. Your genes have to be good enough so that your kids can also pass them along. Guess whose job it is to teach the kids how to use their genetics to accentuate the positive and overcome the negative? Not many 4 year olds impressing the boss so they can buy glasses to learn how to read or 16 year olds spontaneously learning which traits to look for in a potential mate.
Load More Replies...That's why I tell the woman I'm into that I'm actively selling her on me. And, boy, it's hard.
don't agree...we are social beings, we use emotional connections as a mean of survival...the more friends you have in the group, the lower the chance of getting left behind. so things like sex and the behaviour surrounding it are also to make strong connections, friends, sexual partners are also allies within the community. so doesn't matter if the relationship doesn't lead to reproduction, it fullfylls a role in our survival as social animals. our behaviour is calibrated to make the kind of allies that will support us, and our children in the future...i many many cultures potential mates and potential emotional partners are no necessarily the same. but in small societies is a social imperative to mate, for the societies future. but not necessarily for you as an individual
Because men are more attacted to pretty and stupid (to feel dominance over both the woman and other suitors) and women are more attracted to wealthy and manipulatable? (to gain access to more resources but also seceretly control said resources)
Well they're also just to increase personal survival, as well; group belonging is a safety net most of us instinctively seek
yes and no, I think a lot of social media is virtue signalling to our incrowd which has to do with group belonging not necessarily breeding. Particularly if you think of say groups for LGBTQIA+ people who aren't de facto going to breed.
On the one hand, just because you're not consciously expecting to procreate doesn't mean you're immune to the hormones (aces might get a by though). On the other hand, I do think it's a dramatic oversimplification to begin with.
Load More Replies...People loved the thread and some even provided more interesting insights
www.yourfallacy.is and www.yourbias.is are great sites with similar content.
Dunning-Kruger is one of the most unusual and inventive concepts, but by golly, it's so damn true.
The irony of Dunning-Kruger is it's one of the most known, but also most misunderstood effects of it's kind. And most people don't realize they didn't get it right.
Load More Replies...I have the Tony Effect, named after my friend. It is thus: the problem where someone can't take a compliment, turning everything into a "no u" battle. I have the Gracie-Inara Effect: in every children's choir there will be that one kid who sings the loudest and the most out of tune. And finally, I have the Queen Kate Issue, where if you think about someone as a romantic interest for long enough, you'll actually think you're in love with them. These are things I have experienced and what I have found to be true. And now I show them to the world.
If I never read anything on BP again, this piece will be the one I will remember!
www.yourfallacy.is and www.yourbias.is are great sites with similar content.
Dunning-Kruger is one of the most unusual and inventive concepts, but by golly, it's so damn true.
The irony of Dunning-Kruger is it's one of the most known, but also most misunderstood effects of it's kind. And most people don't realize they didn't get it right.
Load More Replies...I have the Tony Effect, named after my friend. It is thus: the problem where someone can't take a compliment, turning everything into a "no u" battle. I have the Gracie-Inara Effect: in every children's choir there will be that one kid who sings the loudest and the most out of tune. And finally, I have the Queen Kate Issue, where if you think about someone as a romantic interest for long enough, you'll actually think you're in love with them. These are things I have experienced and what I have found to be true. And now I show them to the world.
If I never read anything on BP again, this piece will be the one I will remember!









