Comedian Pokes Fun At “Conservative Logic” By “Defending” 30 Of The Most Evil Villains
Comedy is one of those few things that seems like it will never hit the bottom of the barrel. As long as the world continues to spin, people will continue to come up with ways to keep everyone entertained through laughter.
Take Greg Larsen, for instance. The award-winning actor, writer, director, and comedian went to Twitter asking people to share names of those who are universally agreed to be evil. You know, people like genocidal dictators, serial killers, and just plain baddies, whether real or fictional.
This way, he challenged himself to defend them and their actions using “conservative logic.” And the internet delivered, bringing in nearly 80,000 likes and over 18,000 retweets, suggesting some of the seemingly most undefendable people (and non-humans) in history.
Image credits: gregmlarsen
Bored Panda invites you to read through some of Greg’s best attempts at defending these baddies to the best of his “conservative” ability. And while you’re down there, why not vote and comment on the ones you enjoyed the most!
More Info: Twitter
This post may include affiliate links.
Greg Larsen is an award-winning actor, writer, director, comedian and podcaster from Melbourne, Australia. He’s best known for his work in The Grub Podcast, At Home Alone Together, Get Krack!n, and Tonightly with Tom Ballard.
Back in August of 2020, Greg went to Twitter with a bit of a wild idea—he asked his followers to name the absolute most evil people on the planet—people like genocidal dictators, serial killers, and the like.
The internet was keen to respond immediately after this tweet went live. Now, many were posting actual historical figures, like Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Kim Jong Un, but others spiced it up, suggesting more than just politicians and infamous people in history.
The list quickly grew with the likes of Joffrey Baratheon from Game of Thrones, Immortan Joe from Mad Max, Bowser from the Mario universe, The Borg from Star Trek, and many more.
Covid literally destroyed the annual influenza epidemic. Good on you Covid-19.
HELPING THE BRITISH ECONOMY- LMAO WHY IS THIS SOMETHING THEY WOULD ACTUALLY SAY
Yet others took a more comic approach and suggested defending the likes of Mr. Burns from The Simpsons, Wile E. Coyote from Road Runner, and Ursula from The Little Mermaid. There was even one person who put up a picture of Vegemite iSnack 2.0 and asked to defend the marketing guy who invented it.
The thread garnered nearly 80,000 likes with over 18,000 retweets and over 6,000 quote tweets in mere days. If you want, you can check out the whole thread here.
But before you go, why not let us know which defenses you loved the most or what other evil people you would like to see defended in the comment section below!
I feel like I have to post something, because currently there are no comments here
It is indeed the planets fault for not being careful where to float, just like an automobile not looking at the road and crashing into a motorcycle.
Love the fact that the response doesn’t know what inquisition means
This is actually the argument you hear from Manson worshipers and apologists today. Problem is you're still guilty of murder if you have someone else do it for you
He's (or was) actually considered a national hero in Romania if I'm not mistaken, for defending against the Ottoman Empire
Note: this post originally had 52 images. It’s been shortened to the top 30 images based on user votes.
I both love and hate how accurate this is, oh my gosh. I swear, 95% of the conservative arguments I see on social media look exactly like this, and generally rely on logical fallacies instead of hard evidence.
You know you're good when I *know* this is a joke but it's still pissing me off a bit haha
He is spot on with the endless repetitions of "arguments" that conservatives use. "Show me the evidence." is one of their biggest favorites. But when you show them the evidence their inevitable reply is :" Yeah, fake news from lame stream media. Stay blind."
Did people not read the title? The whole point is getting seeing the absurdity of conservative logic. You don't need metal gymnastics to understand, just read the title, lol.
I had to quit. B/c it started to read more like my neighbor who spouts Newsmax/etc.
These are awesome! He should do the reverse where he uses Republican logic to make good people bad
This is hilarious, but per seeing some of the comments, I think one has to have a acute sense of sarcasm to actually get these.
This is one of the most amazing piece of rhetoric I have ever read. It is terrifying and beautiful at the same time.
The catchphrases are spot on and I still can't get over how they've shortened 'Anti Fascist' to 'Antifa' so as to hide the fact that if you take the opposing view you are backing Fascism..
Can we agree that by adding in or leaving out context on purpose, things can be skewed to manipulate the audience. If you want these things to not exist, start demanding that people in arguments/debates give all information, not just whatever suits their side of the story. If they don't do so, instantly agree with the other side. It's simple, people either want the unbiased truth to prevail, or to win for their own benefit only. Learn to spot the difference.
Leave it to Bored Panda users to ruin a thread with their complete lack of understanding of the premise. This one is better for reddit.
It was fun until he stopped defending them and started blaiming lefts for everything. (I know he is kidding, but it would be more fun if he would just defend the villains instead of saying that the only reason they are bad is because of the lefties.)
These are funny and there are plenty of conservatives that argue like this, but not all conservatives argue like this and there are plenty of progressives that do too. What someone thinks and how they think are two different things.
Excellent approach, hits the nail on the head 👍🏻. I think the implied questions on Wile .E. Coyote and Joffrey are valid though. We know the intentions of Wile and his actions, that's not the case in possible edited videos. And the mentality of getting rid of anything deemed as bad at all costs sparked a lot of violence (from left and right). Questioning sources and actions of groups doesn't seem "conservative" to me, just a sensible thing to do
I both love and hate how accurate this is, oh my gosh. I swear, 95% of the conservative arguments I see on social media look exactly like this, and generally rely on logical fallacies instead of hard evidence.
You know you're good when I *know* this is a joke but it's still pissing me off a bit haha
He is spot on with the endless repetitions of "arguments" that conservatives use. "Show me the evidence." is one of their biggest favorites. But when you show them the evidence their inevitable reply is :" Yeah, fake news from lame stream media. Stay blind."
Did people not read the title? The whole point is getting seeing the absurdity of conservative logic. You don't need metal gymnastics to understand, just read the title, lol.
I had to quit. B/c it started to read more like my neighbor who spouts Newsmax/etc.
These are awesome! He should do the reverse where he uses Republican logic to make good people bad
This is hilarious, but per seeing some of the comments, I think one has to have a acute sense of sarcasm to actually get these.
This is one of the most amazing piece of rhetoric I have ever read. It is terrifying and beautiful at the same time.
The catchphrases are spot on and I still can't get over how they've shortened 'Anti Fascist' to 'Antifa' so as to hide the fact that if you take the opposing view you are backing Fascism..
Can we agree that by adding in or leaving out context on purpose, things can be skewed to manipulate the audience. If you want these things to not exist, start demanding that people in arguments/debates give all information, not just whatever suits their side of the story. If they don't do so, instantly agree with the other side. It's simple, people either want the unbiased truth to prevail, or to win for their own benefit only. Learn to spot the difference.
Leave it to Bored Panda users to ruin a thread with their complete lack of understanding of the premise. This one is better for reddit.
It was fun until he stopped defending them and started blaiming lefts for everything. (I know he is kidding, but it would be more fun if he would just defend the villains instead of saying that the only reason they are bad is because of the lefties.)
These are funny and there are plenty of conservatives that argue like this, but not all conservatives argue like this and there are plenty of progressives that do too. What someone thinks and how they think are two different things.
Excellent approach, hits the nail on the head 👍🏻. I think the implied questions on Wile .E. Coyote and Joffrey are valid though. We know the intentions of Wile and his actions, that's not the case in possible edited videos. And the mentality of getting rid of anything deemed as bad at all costs sparked a lot of violence (from left and right). Questioning sources and actions of groups doesn't seem "conservative" to me, just a sensible thing to do