“Everyone Just Laughed It Off”: 26 Movie Scenes That Definitely Didn’t Age Well
When we watch films, we know that we’re not seeing real life. We can suspend our disbelief to accept that bullet holes won't zoom through car doors and humans can simply brush off brutal injuries and continue along with their days. But just because movies aren’t real life doesn’t mean they should be riddled with problematic content…
Cinephiles on Reddit have been discussing some of the most famous films and scenes from years ago that definitely wouldn’t be well received today. From casual examples of racism and misogyny to consent being completely ignored, we’ve gathered some of the most blatantly problematic examples below. So enjoy reading through and being reminded of which movies you don't need to rewatch, and be sure to upvote the films that aged like milk!
This post may include affiliate links.
Grease. That scene where Danny is pressuring Sandy in the car. And just his entire behaviour towards her. Ew.
Are there things in Grease that are not acceptable today? Yes. Do I still love that movie and know every word? Also yes
It's beyond gross. The "did you get very far" "did she put up a fight" song is the worst.
Load More Replies...To be fair, it was always meant to be off putting, the purpose of the scene is to show what an a*****e Danny is when being around his friends. Same with the song lyrics about "if she put up a fight" - it's to put emphasis on the bad influence they have on him
Came here to say this - it was never supposed to by okay!! It was supposed to show how gross that group of guys are!
Load More Replies...Typical high school stuff. At least the writers let Sandy leave and slam the door on Danny's ummm... bulge.
If you stop and think about it, this movie/play did an excellent job of highlighting problematic behaviours of the time. If you can’t wrap your head around the idea that it was intended to challenge common concepts then most of the movie/play was lost on you. Even Shakespeare was a subversive. His plays were popular because they focused on the intrinsic hypocrisy and foolishness of group think. Here ends a sermon from someone who actually understood that literature doesn’t just reflect reality, it provides a commentary from the writer’s perspective.
I think you missed the point. He was a young idiot who didnt respect his woman but learned over the course of the movie that he was wrong
That movie came out when I was in jr. high and even then I thought the actors looked waayyyyy too old be playing teenagers.
To be fair, Danny felt pressured by his friends to look cool or whatever. That doesn't make it right, of course.
The way Natalie is constantly body-shamed in Love Actually.
I agree but I also wonder if the point of him falling for her was to show that she had nothing to be ashamed about? I always thought she was pretty and didn't see anything wrong about her figure.
Because that’s not the case anymore... ?! and personally, I would kill to be as beautiful as Natalie
You didn't think Hollywood was going to use an actor that's unattractive and/or fat to play a character that's gets shamed as unattractive and/or fat, did you?
Load More Replies...It was used for comedy. The film wouldn’t have been different without it.
Load More Replies...It's really a shame, because the pressure that falls on the women in Hollywood is enormous which in turn is transferred to all the women. Not just about their body, but also their appearance.
To this very day I still find this movie incredibly cheesy and cringey and I can’t quite put my finger on it.
Oh no, reality in a movie! The point in her case is she finds someone who likes her for her.
American Beauty. Something about Kevin Spacey trying to have sex with an underage kid makes it tough to watch now.
That scene was pertinent to the movie, not gratuitous. It's supposed to have shock value.
It was tough to watch them! But I think that was the point of the movie
It never ceased to annoy me when this is brought up...it was supposed to be creepy, the whole point of the film is middle aged man having a crisis.
I would love to rewatch 'The Shipping News' but Kevin Spacey just creeps me out too much now.
I don't know why the film was so acclaimed when it came out. It gave me the creeps when I first saw it.
That's why. It was supposed to be creepy! It did what it was supposed to do!
Load More Replies...
Jim shares nude video of Nadia on the internet in American Pie. Everyone just laughed it off.
The thing is, stuff like this happens more often now as kids have camera phones. So to say it hasn't aged well is inaccurate. If anything, you could say that this was ahead of its time and warning us of the dangers of the Internet.
It hasn't aged well because everyone thought it was funny. It might happen more often nowadays but less people think it s funny. Well, at least I hope it's less people now.
Load More Replies...If you don't know, then you should never be allowed near a real woman.
Load More Replies...
Sixteen Candles. A lot of racism, casually addressing sexual assault, and later an actual date [sex crime].
u/thesecondaqaurius:16 Candles, the scene where he hands his drunk girlfriend to the geeky freshman and tells him to do whatever he wants... hella problematic.
And also can we just say rape, knowing your assailant is most common. It's just rape ffs. (Not knocking your use) oh and also let's not overlook the sex trafficking as well
Load More Replies...I disappear for a week and return to find BP replacing rape with [sex crime], what's next? "I lifted my sword and [gave them a boo-boo]"
Watch George Carlin - Soft Language on youtube. BP are literally doing exactly what he talks about in that clip. Also, it's very funny. RIP George.
One day someone will post an item about Rohypnol and BP will describe it as "date [sex crime] [illegal substances]"
You can say great movie, on the whole it was and it IS fiction, but to say you don't care about sex trafficking, rape, racism, wth guy?
Load More Replies...
Breakfast at Tiffany’s. Awful yellow face by Mickey Rooney.
This is one of my favourite films, but his scenes always ruin it for me. Like why did they do this??
Mickey Rooney wasn't comfortable with the situation at all, but the studio kept insisting that it would be the funniest thing ever once they finished editing. Spoilers: it was not and people didn't love it back then either
Load More Replies...It wasn't. It also wasn't as funny as they must have thought it would be even back then.
Load More Replies...Now, there's a movie that could use a re-make. It's a good story, and could be updated intelligently, without the 'problems'.
Just cut all scenes with Mr Yunioshi. I can't watch this movie because I know his scenes are coming. Just a horrible scene and character, even aside from the blatant racism
Load More Replies...How about Sean Connery as Japanese in You Only Live Twice?
Load More Replies...
When Vince Vaughn is forced to have sex with Gloria in Wedding Crashers.
Just cuz it's a man getting raped instead of a woman doesn't make it funny.
While we're at it, can we stop perpetuating the myth that it's hot when female teachers sleep with their underage male students? Literally saw a newspaper article about this and it literally said the teacher 'had sex with' the student. Not 'raped' him, but 'had sex with'. Gross.
Load More Replies...Oh yes, let's ignore the part where he said no several times and physically tried to get away from the situation.
Load More Replies...
We saw Holiday Inn on Prime and said "It'll be a nice Bing Crosby movie with some Christmas songs," turned it on, and suddenly the cast is there in black face singing some of the most racist s**t I've ever heard.
In the UK we had a very popular Saturday evening prime time show(1970's) called the Black and White Minstrels show. Check that out if you get a chance!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It had a prime time weekend slot until 1984. And this was when there were only 3 channels available to choose from.
Load More Replies...It's very difficult to imagine a time when this was considered normal and no one would blink an eye at Bing Crosby in blackface. God bless YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29UtQflUlXc
Why are you surprised, this is a time when white people routinely murdered, raped, beat and committed other crimes against Black Americans? “Very difficult to imagine” is how we as white people allow ourselves to ignore and perpetuate racism. You know, like how rapists say it was consensual sex? No one blinked and eye? Pretty sure Black people blinked many an eye, not thinking that Black people are indeed people is how you yourself have been groomed to be racist.
Load More Replies...I'm soooooo glad they removed that song/scene when they adapted it for stage!
It was 1942 these things were done. Unfortunate part of history but it does show how far we have come in a relatively short time. Yes it was very hard to watch. Heart wrenching.
This is not the most racist shıt I've ever heard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9sitVOoxb8
Blank Check. An adult woman kisses the little boy on the lips for waaaay longer than I'm comfortable with. Imagine if the genders were reversed.
Why would reversing the genders be worse? It's completely disgusting no matter what adult is making out with what child.
I think it was more of "the outrage would have been hella louder." We all know that young men and older women is always held differently. Or we wouldn't have the slang term "cougar" used so flippantly.
Load More Replies...I find it stupid that people, unfortunately, would make a bigger deal if a man did it to a girl just because he's a man and she's a girl. It's complete rubbish, though. It should be equally bad no matter the gender of the people involved.
Imagine if the genders were reversed? Worse? Don't think so. Both p3do.
I don't think they're saying it would be worse, but rather that people would be more outraged by it. There's a societal tendency to think that guys always want sex and that a young boy is "lucky" to have an experienced older woman to "teach" them. It's untrue, of course; definitely gross and definitely abuse.
Load More Replies...Shirley Henderson was in her 30's when she was hired to play Moaning Myrtle, a teenage ghost in Harry Potter. The character had a crush on the twelve year old Harry. Radcliffe was 13-15 while Henderson worked with him. It was creepy watching Myrtle fawning all over Harry, and I wonder how weird it was to the actors.
Yeah, me. It was a great movie, but the little boy losing his virginity at his age with grown up chick was far beyond the line. Ew
Load More Replies...Wow. He looks way younger than he did the last time I saw that movie. Granted, that must have been more than twenty years ago now.
Also the one with Nicole Kidman (I can't remember the name) where she kisses a young boy because he claims to be her dead husband reborn.
Just saw this last night with the ladies in my family... Seven Brides for Seven Brothers.
Those ginger fellas literally went one by one and abducted the hottest chicks from some town then held them hostage for months until through Stockholm Syndrome the women all fell for them.
I guess OP didn't realize that the movie is actually a version of the rape of the Sabines. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rape_of_the_Sabine_Women#Adaptations
I grew up watching this movie with my sisters. I will always sing and dance to it, but, being a family that loves to discuss social issues, it has been a great and evolving talking point over the years. A couple of tiny redeeming factors it has is a strong main female character (Millie) who stands up for what she believes in from the beginning and defies her husband AND that the main male character does read lose his mistake and tries to make amends.
WHAT?! I haven’t ever seen this, so I assumed it was just 7 brothers finding their respective wives! At the age of 47, I am truly shocked! 😳
Honestly, there's a bit more to the story than they're portraying here. A backwoods man, Adam, meets & marries a pretty awesome townswoman, Millie. She doesn't realize his 6 uncivilized brothers will be living with them, too, but she quickly shows them all who's boss and starts teaching them manners & to respect others. At a barn raising, the 6 brothers catch the eyes of 6 women. However, as they live in the hills, they have little chance of marrying them. Adam suggests (without Millie's knowledge) that they do like the Romans did & bring them to the hills by force. The girls' relatives pursue but an avalanche blocks the road so the girls are stuck for ~6 months. Millie is HORRIFIED. She forbids all the men from setting foot in the house. Over the 6 months, the girls start furious but gradually forgive them as they see the men realizing how badly they messed up and trying to make amends. Adam even says "if someone did this to my daughter, I'd string him up from the nearest tree." (cont....)
Load More Replies...Adding random and super specific details to your story is a common way to inject humor into your writing.
Load More Replies...Ikr, as a redhead myself I cringed a bit reading that, felt like op was slightly insulting redheads
Load More Replies...Ha, was just watching this movie the other day and my daughter asked what it was, I said it's my favorite movie about a family that kidnaps a bunch of girls and holds them hostage in a mountain cabin until they all develop Stockholm syndrome, then they all get married.
The movie is so ridiculous it's funny... What's not funny is that it wasn't meant to hyperbole...
Yeah, the values dissonance is strong in this one. I happen to have the DVD, I still like to see the dances, but that is pretty much all this movie has for my nowdays.
But Milly looked after all the girls and kept the boys in their place.Taught them how to behave and sorted everything.I still love this film.
Revenge of the Nerds.
Even if you chalk up the spy cams to be "80s College Comedy Hi-jinx" the scene where Lewis has sex with Betty because she thinks he's Stan definitely isn't cool today.
There’s a name for that, it’s called “R@pe by Deception”. Not to mention the sceneswhere those gosh-darn wacky nerds put hidden cameras in the girls’ house and watch them naked (oh, and one of the nerds is 12 years old), or put the nude pictures of Betty at the bottom of the pie. Comedy!
Robot Chicken did a funny sketch where the Nerds all face judgement and incarceration. That movie and Porkey's... Such 70s scum
"Such 70s scum" with 'Animal House' paving the way for them all...
Load More Replies...
That scene in the first Rocky movie where he seduces Adrian by coercing her into his apartment after she's said no, physically blocking the exit when she tries to leave, taking his clothes off without any encouragement, and then kissing her without any consent as she clearly tries to resist.
The "it's true love" s**t is especially stupid in situations like this.
A bite to the throat usually leads to a clear way - and sometimes to a dead body on the floor. In case somebody needs self defense tips...
One of the great movies, ruined by that one scene. I know what they were going for (she's shy, he knows it and knows the only way through is to persist) but NO just NO NO NO.
This puts on display how men were expected to lead in romance back then... This was especially true when dealing with a shy woman... Is it ok by today's standards? Of course not... But let me just say if Rocky doesn't hit on her then she never breaks out of her timidity to grow beyond her brother into her own person... And btw they get married and stay together for the entirety of the series up to her death... So I'm pretty sure that she was cool with it in retrospect
White Chicks.
Try making a movie with that premise with those kind of jokes today.
Part of me wonders if that's why they did it...never saw it, looked like a bad movie.
Load More Replies...There shouldn't be any sort of "x-facing" though an argument can be made that context matters a la Tropic Thunder. But conflating "whitefacing" with any other is completely ridiculous in every context. Again, it shouldn't be done but saying White Chicks is just as bad as Breakfast At Tiffany's or any minstrel show is flatout asinine and minimizes the harm that blackface, yellowface, etc. has caused marginalized groups.
I never understood the popularity of this movie. Not because it offended me, I just didn't think it was funny.
One of those "It's so bad it's a classic" things
Load More Replies...Or in the same year but with blackface; I don’t imagine that being well perceived?
I mean those two things aren't comparable at all since painting your face white doesn't contain a reference to an extremely racist and dehumanizing cultural practice.
Load More Replies...Oh honey. You're like those people who miss the point of Blazing Saddles and claim it couldn't have been made today. Of course it could, the movie exists to ridicule racists.
Their eyes were the problem I'm white, give 0 f***s about the white face But this movie deserves to be up there due to the Marilyn Manson contacts
A whole segment in Peter Pan with a bunch of Native American people singing a song called 'What Makes the Red Man Red?'
I saw it when I was a kid in the 1950s. I knew nothing about stereotypes, but - even though this was my favorite movie - something inside me said the equivalent of "Really?" I suspect that what my parents had told me about prejudice against black skins told me it applied to red ones too.
There are actually a lot of cringy things in old, beloved cartoons. Like Bugs Bunny imitating the Japanese. I mean yikes. :(
There’s a set of Looney Tunes shorts that have not been shown on TV since 1968 known as the Censored 11 due to racist depictions of black people. One of them is actually really good but most of them are pretty cringy overall.
Load More Replies...Lots of old Disney movies have the "racist portion" but strangely they seem to keep most of it to that one portion.
Major australian sweet company only recently changed name of a popular raspberry chew from redskin. Logo was a american indian But nowhere near as bad as our popular ..c**n .,cheese.
James Bond [commits serious sex crime] on P. Galore in Goldfinger.
Ngl, there were times in those early Bond movies when I almost wanted the bad guy to win lol
And Sean as himself was rather a bad guy when it came to women as well
Load More Replies...You can always tell when someone has not read the books. Bond is a brute. he smokes, drinks, womanises, kills people for a living. But the movie industry kept feminising him until we peaked with Pierce Brosnan as pretty boy spy.
By "feminising" him did you mean "civilising" him?
Load More Replies...His treatment of women is why his bond will never be my favorite bond...
Daniel Craig is my favorite Bond. A lot more depth to his character, and he isn't a rapist.
Load More Replies...If a serious sex crime is rape then what is a non serious sex crime?
Lazeby slaps girl for her it stop redisting. Very very bizarre
Besides that, I never got into the movies - there is a threat to the whole world and they send one guy instead of, I don't know, the SAS or a whole NATO task force?
Never Been Kissed. The teacher becomes interested in Drew Barrymore’s character. She’s an adult but “plays” a high school student.
In it's somewhat defense, that's pretty reductive. He's not a "good guy" because it's gross either way but he's more mad that she was a reporter who used underhanded tactics to write a story than that she wasn't a minor.
Load More Replies...Same. Yeah, the teacher-student thing is pretty gross but we can still enjoy media that is problematic as long as we recognize it. I don't suddenly hate Harry Potter because Rowling is a piece of s**t.
Load More Replies...
Soul Man (1986) C. Thomas Howell in blackface to get a college scholarship.
To be fair, this movie was considered problematic and poorly executed when it was released. It pretty much destroyed C. Thomas Howell's career
I recall watching this baock in the day. I remember his friend(s) telling him it was a straight up bad idea; he actually did experience racism from the police and when he finally admitted to his deed, he got expelled and had to repay the scholarship.
I watched this as a young boy and didn't understand even then how everyone couldn't tell he was white and wearing makeup
This whole stupid thing about using dark makeup being the equivalent of "blackface" is, well, stupid. Blackface was particular makeup that performers used and then used it mock black people while getting a laugh out of the audience. When I was little in the 70s, I LOVED ME some Janet Jackson. If I had wanted to dress up like her, I might have tried to look like her, and put dark makeup on. I mean, people wear wigs and do all kinds of things to dress up like other people, and the makeup would be no different. I would not have been doing anything wrong if I'd done that. (I knew her mainly as an actor at the time, not a singer, so it's not so likely I would have dressed up like her.) Now, the actual plot of this movie is a bigger question. The fact that he disguised himself in some way isn't really the issue. I mean, why is the makeup the issue and not the hair? Just the fact that people point to one and not the other shows how dumb this is.
Well, that is exactly what a low key racist would say. Think of blackface as rape and your rant was a man grabbing a woman’s crotch.
Load More Replies...Jimmy Kimmel and Sara Silverman did blackface too, but they seem to have gotten a pass.
Blade Runner. Hold on, don't get furious yet. The film still is 95% brilliance; the soundtrack, the directing, the acting. But there's that scene where Rachael is trying to leave Rick's home after discovering her life is a lie, Rick refuses to let her leave, holding the door shut and physically handling her until he pins her to a wall and kisses her "passionately". I think it's meant to be taken as "a man taking charge" in the way the 80's loved that, but it comes across as super, super ra**y now. TL:DR Rick Deckard sexually assaults a woman during a severe mental breakdown.
My ex tried that one on thinking it was sexy. It went over about as well as you would expect.
My impression on this scene is that Deckard does this only after discovering that Rachel is a machine. He's treating her like an object, in the same way that, when talking to Tyrell earlier, on finding out Rachel is a replicant, he stopped calling her "she" and started calling her "it". "How can it not know what it is?" This is actually one of the themes of the movie: all the replicants have feelings, like real people. Rachel has memories and even thought she was real. But to "real" humans, the replicants are machines, objects ... literally objectified. They're replaceable, disposable. Pris was a "pleasure model", and Roy was used for combat. They were enslaved, dehumanized, despite being as intelligent as the scientists that created them. I never felt the scene was supposed to be "sexy". I think it was always supposed to be disturbing, and an insight into why the replicants were rebelling ... that and the fact they living "designed obsolescence" with a four-year lifespan.
Look at it this way. Rachel is a Replicant, an artificial person. In their society, that's the same as owning a sex doll. She isn't human, therefore she has no rights. Deckard can do whatever he wants with her. Technically, it is not assault.
Not everyone loved it, even in the eighties. Translation: Women have ALWAYS hated this kind of male fantasy b******t.
I think OP was saying that 80s media loved it (media which was controlled by men)
Load More Replies...The point of that scene is to highlight that despite his attraction to her Deckard doesn't consider replicants to be full humans... So he ignores her basic rights to get what he desires... His attitude changes by the film's end after his run in with Hauer's character
This, to me, is a perfect example of why we shouldn't necessarily hold media and art to some arbitrary purity test. Set you own boundaries but to me It doesn't have to be an "all or nothing" situation. Blade Runner is a masterpiece and this is easily the worst part of it. I think "of the time" does excuse some things but ultimately this is a small, terrible part of a great whole. None of us are perfect, I'm sure especially so when we were younger or even just several years ago.
Pretty much the whole premise of Bladerunner is the observation that dehumanizing people so you can treat them as nothing more than objects is a bad thing.
Load More Replies...I think some people are missing the point...here, Deckard isn't acting towards her the way he would a human woman, he is having trouble seeing her as 100% real or 100%replicant, so his behavior matches that confusion. Is he acting inappropriately, I feel that way when I watch it but I try to keep the context straight... his character is not sure of how to act and so it comes across as wrong to the viewers, myself included. I think he is ultimately confused by his attraction to her and the part of him that is repulsed by replicants (and partially his attraction) makes him behave that way towards Rachael.
Tiptoes. For a movie made in 2003, it’s surprisingly offensive toward little people. Having to watch Gary Oldman waddle around on his knees with a fake hump on his shoulder (which is essentially a wadded up T-shirt shoved under the one he’s already wearing) is just too much.
What baffles me is that they had an actual person with dwarfism, Peter Dinklange, playing a supporting role in this film, who could have played the main role instead.
Peter Dinklange doesn't like taking roles where highlighting dwarfism is the main/only point
Load More Replies...I have yet to meet a person with dwarfism who approves of the term "little person". they've all said it's the most condescending sh1t they've ever heard. You're not being PC by using that phrase, you're being a tw@t.
When movie makers lean toward star-power instead of proper representation.
Mrs Doubtfire. Today, Daniel Hillard would never see the world as a free man again.
Did you know it was actually based on a book? I didn't. It's called Madame Doubtfire and the plot is pretty much the same. I don't remember if it's the same in the movie because I haven't seen the thing in about 25 years, but at the end Daniel gets busted and realises what a selfish a*****e he's been and that he needs to change his ways and stop being unfair to his ex by ignoring her valid criticisms of what an irresponsible slob he is.
I rewatched the movie not long ago, and one thing I liked is that this stunt blows up Daniel's life. It costs him not just custody, but even unsupervised visitation with his kids. They tack on a bit of happy ending in that Daniel is allowed to see his kids again, but he doesn't get back with his ex like most movies of the era did, and he actually experiences negative consequences for his zany antics.
Load More Replies...Not to mention he almost killed his ex's new fella, he knew that he was allergic to pepper, regardless whether or not he didn't intend to " kill the poor bast**d " , fact is, he almost did, yet, somehow that's forgotten about....??
He did it because some AH judge and the mom decided he could only see his kids once every two weeks. Come on. It made me cry when I rewatched it. Who does that to a dad, and especially the kids???
His subsequent actions of violating his exes private life like that, trying to break up her -healthy- new relationship, absolutely prove the point that he did not have the responsibility and accountability to be a father though. I love Robin Williams, the film is funny, but as a character study...? Quite f'ing creepy
Load More Replies...When you really think of it, his wife probably heard every schtick he had 1000 times. She would have clocked him in 3 minutes IRL.
That was my husbands first question about this movie
Load More Replies...Thus is when Danieland his brother are trying different looks for Mrs. D.
Load More Replies...Again, I thought this was highly problematic at the time. Most people now probably still don't see it as a problem. The people who see it as a problem now, probably would have seen it as a problem then, too. I thought the wife should have done her damnedest to make sure he never saw those kids again. Hated that movie.
TEACHERS with Nick Nolte. Warm fuzzy teacher helps a student get an abortion. She is knocked up by his buddy, the gym teacher, and they all want to keep it quiet. This was just a side story to show how much this teacher cared about his students...so gross....
A couple things: 1. The gym teacher wasn't a "buddy". 2. Yes, the teacher having sex with the student is gross. But I didn't see anything in the movie hinting it was anything else. 3. Yes, as a teacher, Nick Nolte's character had a responsibility to report the incident to other people: teachers, parents, etc. However, the student didn't want that. She begged the teacher not to tell her parents saying "they'd kill me; my father would throw me out; my whole life would be over" (yes, I went back and watched the scene). He didn't ask who the father was. He saw a student who was upset and desperate and tried to help her. Even offered other suggestions (have the baby and put it up for adoption). 4. Yes, he was wrong and the school threatened to fire him. I think this is kind of misrepresenting the movie a bit.
Correct. A teacher getting a student pregnant is not played for laughs in any sort of way, it was seen as being every bit as horrific then as it is now. The point of him taking her to get an abortion was to show that in many schools teachers are the most stable and influential adults in the lives of many kids. Basically showing that he was more of a father figure to her than her own father
Load More Replies...
Animal House, with its [sex crime]-contemplation scene.
The scene where he decides not to and his shoulder devil calls him a f@***t?
Not seen it but surely that's what a shoulder devil would do?
Load More Replies...
National Lampoon's Vacation. If an IRL Clark W. Griswold really did the things in the movie he'd be branded a domestic terrorist, not including the stealing from a hotel and k*****g a dog.
I'm probably the only person on the planet that doesn't find these movies at all amusing. Christmas Vacation, honestly, is very sad and kinda heartbreaking.
He didn’t steal from the hotel. He put the check that he knew was good in the register. It just violated the hotel policy, and pretty much the policy of any business at the time’s, policy of holding a personal check at least a week to ensure that there were sufficient funds in the account. Clark knew he had enough funds, but had no way to get to them without his credit cards, so he was breaking a policy, but not the law
The first Ace Ventura. Its still funny, but there is not way in hell they'd be able to make it now.
Personally i still find this movie funny. Im part of the LGBTQ+ community and i see it as a point in history but that doesnt mean i cant enjoy it now. Personally i dont find it offensive, the same way i dont find gay jokes offensive. If you dont like it then dont watch.
Yeah. I'm also queer and I think it's borderline. Remembering that Einhorn/Finkestein got the gender reassignment to hide, not because they actually identified as a woman.
Load More Replies...I honestly don't find this movie any good. What's so funny about it? Jim Carrey making faces? And I'm not talking about 'problematic' parts.
God, I hate the "coUldN't bE MaDE nOWaDaYS" stupidity. 1) Yes, I would hope we moved and grown from some of the stupid s**t we used to think was okay (see: blackface; rape for comedy; etc). If, today, you can't make something funny without using those s****y things we've moved on from then you're probably just not funny. 2) Comedy is cyclical. People say this same stupid s**t every few years. You couldn't make "edgy" comedy after Revenge of the Nerds...until American Pie happened. Couldn't make an "edgy" comedy after American Pie...until The Hangover. Rinse repeat.
The character is obviously not Trans, abd I think his reaction is more being lied to and taken advantage of. Plus Carrey has stated he played the scene as over the top as possible.
I actually thought the second film was wayyyyyy funnier than the first. Especially the scene where he's trapped in the rhino.
If you can't make comedy without ridiculing / stereotypizing / ostracizing minority groups, then you just suck at making comedy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Load More Replies...
Dirty Dancing... P**ophilia isn't as accepted now as it was in the 80s.
We didn’t see the same movie then, because she’s making the decision, not him. she makes it clear that she wants to be with him as he pushes her away
At 17 and 25, this relationship would be illegal in many places.
Load More Replies...She is 17 at least. I understand that legally she is a minor but that is NOT pedophilia. Plus he is supposed to be in his 20ies.
So old enough to be out on her own and independent? Who would have thunk it. (Also old enough to knowingly take on an unconscionable amount of debt to get an education in the US)
Load More Replies...WHAT pedophilia??? There was no prepubescent child in that movie! Please don't throw around specific terms like that if you don't know what they mean.
Someone wrote recently, possibly somewhere on BP, that when you're older enough to be a parent her father's point of view suddenly looks like the only way to see it.
The movie would have been a whole lot less sketchy if they had just slightly raised the age of Baby, gotta say.
I would argue 'context' for a lot of these as I do whenever I hear the screeches of 'WHY IS HISTORY BAAAD'. But to be honest, most of these films were pretty awful even when they were released...
I had forgotten about that when I thoughtlessly sat down with my kids to watch it...
Load More Replies...I hate articles like this so much. Yeah. Things were different back then. PEOPLE were different. Some things are questionable, and some are just way over the line, but as a society we have progressed to where these things bother us now. That is a good thing. We don't have to let these things ruin entertainment where you feel guilty even watching it. Just accept them as products of their era and find the laughs or drama they provide. Watching a 40 year old movie through today's societal lens is silly.
I don't think it's silly. It's how people can improve and learn. Some like to dissect films and some like to just watch. Personally I'm more the latter, I like escapism fiction but sometimes the former is fun to see others discussing.
Load More Replies...Not a movie, but Celiene Dion met her husband when she was 12...and he was about 30.
He totally groomed her and lied to her mother’s face that he didn’t start having sex with her before she turned 18. I was glad he died and I hope she got some age-appropriate young peen before her diagnosis.
Load More Replies...Most people here seem to not be able to grasp the fact that films like Revenge of the Nerds were NOT meant to be taken seriously. Yes, even 40 years ago people knew that if you did the things in the film, you'd be arrested. Nobody in 1984 actually believed colleges were like that. Everyone understood that it was an over-the-top R-rated slapstick comedy for adults.
"White Men Can't Jump". If it was any color other than white, the movie would have been protested right out of theaters.
you...you just read an article with recent movies having blackface
Load More Replies...I think it's important to have artistic freedom to adress even the darkest and most hideous subjects but I think how these subjects are addressed is equally important. What is wrong with some of these movies (some I would argue shouldn't be on this list) is not that they included horrible things within the narrative, it's that they portrayed them as being acceptable or irrelevant.
Yes, this is the point of most of the list. It was protrayed how it was allowed and thought to be back then a lot. Some of the fims back then could have been benefit from more progressive direction but it was the history we had to learn from.
Load More Replies...There's a pirate film from 1942, that my dad loves called "The Black Swan"> I have not seen it in full, but he's seen it at least twice a few years ago. Needless to say, whenever the main male character, who unfortunately shares my name, mentions that he was watching the female lead in her room while she slept and at one point just roughly abducts her because he loves her despite her being betrothed to a nobleman, I kept shouting out "Bad pirate!" or mentioning how inappropriate his behavior was, pirate be damned.
Blackface - was a part of theater it is now impossible to talk about, or study. Why yes, it was horribly racist. Moving on; it was also a way to make good money performing. Very popular - so that - if you search YouTube carefully among "early Black " films/performances - you will find more than one group of highly talented Black artists - performing IN BLACKFACE. Yes, Black performers sometimes put on the same makeup - which looks about 1% less phony on them than on white folk. Why? Theater. Way to make a living. Quite likely there some venues where they would not be allowed on stage if they were just normal Black folk - but pretending to be WHITE with Black makeup - sure! What a joke! And incidentally, these guys are fantastic artists... Yes, it's a mad, mad, mad, mad world.
It's even worse that "black" people could only be accepted as performers by wearing black face. Just because they did it doesn't mean they enjoyed it!
Load More Replies...What did our parents tell us about these kinds of problems? Remember? - No you don't- because THESE problems did not EXIST for them - the technology to make old movies instantly available was barely even dreamed of. All you could see was what was in the theaters right now. And- have "Times changed"? Um. They always do. We're going to HAVE to get around to where we judge a piece of art - in it's own time context. Can we remark on changes? Sure. But if you want to accuse people in another time, of not seeing the world exactly as YOU do today - you're a wee bit infantile.
I would argue 'context' for a lot of these as I do whenever I hear the screeches of 'WHY IS HISTORY BAAAD'. But to be honest, most of these films were pretty awful even when they were released...
I had forgotten about that when I thoughtlessly sat down with my kids to watch it...
Load More Replies...I hate articles like this so much. Yeah. Things were different back then. PEOPLE were different. Some things are questionable, and some are just way over the line, but as a society we have progressed to where these things bother us now. That is a good thing. We don't have to let these things ruin entertainment where you feel guilty even watching it. Just accept them as products of their era and find the laughs or drama they provide. Watching a 40 year old movie through today's societal lens is silly.
I don't think it's silly. It's how people can improve and learn. Some like to dissect films and some like to just watch. Personally I'm more the latter, I like escapism fiction but sometimes the former is fun to see others discussing.
Load More Replies...Not a movie, but Celiene Dion met her husband when she was 12...and he was about 30.
He totally groomed her and lied to her mother’s face that he didn’t start having sex with her before she turned 18. I was glad he died and I hope she got some age-appropriate young peen before her diagnosis.
Load More Replies...Most people here seem to not be able to grasp the fact that films like Revenge of the Nerds were NOT meant to be taken seriously. Yes, even 40 years ago people knew that if you did the things in the film, you'd be arrested. Nobody in 1984 actually believed colleges were like that. Everyone understood that it was an over-the-top R-rated slapstick comedy for adults.
"White Men Can't Jump". If it was any color other than white, the movie would have been protested right out of theaters.
you...you just read an article with recent movies having blackface
Load More Replies...I think it's important to have artistic freedom to adress even the darkest and most hideous subjects but I think how these subjects are addressed is equally important. What is wrong with some of these movies (some I would argue shouldn't be on this list) is not that they included horrible things within the narrative, it's that they portrayed them as being acceptable or irrelevant.
Yes, this is the point of most of the list. It was protrayed how it was allowed and thought to be back then a lot. Some of the fims back then could have been benefit from more progressive direction but it was the history we had to learn from.
Load More Replies...There's a pirate film from 1942, that my dad loves called "The Black Swan"> I have not seen it in full, but he's seen it at least twice a few years ago. Needless to say, whenever the main male character, who unfortunately shares my name, mentions that he was watching the female lead in her room while she slept and at one point just roughly abducts her because he loves her despite her being betrothed to a nobleman, I kept shouting out "Bad pirate!" or mentioning how inappropriate his behavior was, pirate be damned.
Blackface - was a part of theater it is now impossible to talk about, or study. Why yes, it was horribly racist. Moving on; it was also a way to make good money performing. Very popular - so that - if you search YouTube carefully among "early Black " films/performances - you will find more than one group of highly talented Black artists - performing IN BLACKFACE. Yes, Black performers sometimes put on the same makeup - which looks about 1% less phony on them than on white folk. Why? Theater. Way to make a living. Quite likely there some venues where they would not be allowed on stage if they were just normal Black folk - but pretending to be WHITE with Black makeup - sure! What a joke! And incidentally, these guys are fantastic artists... Yes, it's a mad, mad, mad, mad world.
It's even worse that "black" people could only be accepted as performers by wearing black face. Just because they did it doesn't mean they enjoyed it!
Load More Replies...What did our parents tell us about these kinds of problems? Remember? - No you don't- because THESE problems did not EXIST for them - the technology to make old movies instantly available was barely even dreamed of. All you could see was what was in the theaters right now. And- have "Times changed"? Um. They always do. We're going to HAVE to get around to where we judge a piece of art - in it's own time context. Can we remark on changes? Sure. But if you want to accuse people in another time, of not seeing the world exactly as YOU do today - you're a wee bit infantile.
