“Embarrasing”: People React To J.K. Rowling’s Comments On Glamour UK’s ‘Women Of The Year’ Cover
JK Rowling, despite having previously complained about netizens threatening her life, is back on social media, stirring the ever-inflammatory gender debate.
This time, she took aim at Glamour UK’s Women of the Year 2025 issue, which features nine transgender women.
But Glamour may be seen as having drawn first blood in the new spat. In promoting this edition, the publication referenced the UK Supreme Court’s April ruling that excluded trans women “from the legal definition” of gender—an outcome Rowling had publicly supported and celebrated.
- JK Rowling reignited the gender debate after criticizing Glamour UK’s Women of the Year issue.
- The magazine featured nine transgender women and subtly referenced a court ruling Rowling supported.
- Glamour clapped back at Rowling on X, replying, “Better luck next year Jo x.”
As with many of her posts on the topic, some fans have rallied behind her remarks, while others see her as a “rabid frothing” transphobe.
Glamour UK named-dropped high-profiles like Pedro Pascal and Mariah Carey to get its point across
Image credits: Getty/Samir Hussein
The post that set the Harry Potter mastermind off went live on Instagram on October 30.
“When London-based American designer Conner Ives closed his AW25 show wearing the now iconic ‘Protect the Dolls’ T-shirt in support of trans women, a full-blown cultural moment was born,” the Glamour update read.
“After April’s UK Supreme Court ruling excluding trans women from the legal definition of […], the message became a rallying cry for solidarity, visibility and resilience.”
To enforce its point, the outlet dropped names like Pedro Pascal (who has a trans sibling), Tilda Swinton, and Mariah Carey as ambassadors for the cause, as they were also seen wearing “Protect the Dolls” T-shirts.
Rowling posted Glamour Magazine’s cover with a criticism
I grew up in an era when mainstream women’s magazines told girls they needed to be thinner and prettier.
Now mainstream women’s magazines tell girls that men are better women than they are. pic.twitter.com/ybEFr8XdSv
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) October 30, 2025
Image credits: Getty/Walter McBride
Glamour confirmed that it would be “crowning” nine “dolls” in “music, publishing, and activism, as our Women of the Year.”
While there were many encores, there was a slew of dissenting comments emanating from women who felt insulted by Glamour’s choice.
Rowling led the charge from X, where she reposted Glamour’s photo of the featured nine, along with the caption:
“I grew up in an era when mainstream women’s magazines told girls they needed to be thinner and prettier.”
“Now mainstream women’s magazines tell girls that men are better than women they are.”
Rowling’s post drew a fair amount of support
Image credits: British GLAMOUR
“What sickens me is so many women are cheering this on. They think they are in the right by completely ignoring women’s needs in their efforts to make sure no man ever experiences hurt feelings,” wrote one person favoring Rowling’s perspective.
The same sentiments appeared alongside the magazine’s Instagram post when one person, summing up the general trans-sceptic stance in the thread, wrote:
“So Glamour’s Women of the Year are… men.”
Glamour Magazine also weighed in on Rowling’s post, wishing her better luck next year
Image credits: British GLAMOUR
To others, these reactions were nothing more than “rabid frothing.” One netizen wrote as much and thanked the publication for “being inclusive.”
“Glamour has always been trans inclusive, and this simply states that trans women are valid, not better,” wrote another, bearing the same sentiments but trying to explain the magazine’s stance on gender issues.
It appears that Glamour anticipated a reaction from Rowling, and they did not have to wait very long, as the author’s reaction came the very next day.
Glamour then telegraphed to her that, yes, this new campaign was with her in mind by responding directly to her X critique with: “Better luck next year Jo x.”
Rowling’s post comes less than a month after SNL mocked her
Image credits: British GLAMOUR
Rowling’s latest post comes less than a month after she was lampooned on SNL.
On the program’s 51st season premiere, Bowen Yang played the role of Dobby, who the author purportedly sent to establish, once and for all, the definition of a woman.
Later, Yang was seen wearing a T-shirt that read “They K Rowling” meshing her name into the non-binary vocabulary that she more often than not finds herself on the wrong side of.
In this sketch, Chang referenced “threats” Rowling had allegedly received—a topic the author has held against actors like Emma Watson, who starred in the Harry Potter universe.
JK Rowling previously complained about being threatened for her stance on gender issues
@glamouruk Everyone deserves that first memory of feeling truly beautiful 💞 From #BelPriestley‘s prom look to #MyaMehmi‘s first clip in extensions, these are the Dolls’ #GirlhoodFirsts♬ original sound – GLAMOUR UK
Image credits: British GLAMOUR
In an earlier post, she slammed Watson, who played Hermione Granger, for taking on the role of a “de facto spokesperson” for her.
One day in 2022, when the internet furor surrounding Rowling was at its most chaotic, both attended the All Witches’ ceremony where Watson spoke.
After her speech, she passed a note to Rowling that read: “I’m so sorry for what you’re going through.”
What Rowling was “going through” included, by her own account, a variety of “threats” resulting in her security measures being “tightened considerably.”
“I was constantly worried for my family’s safety,” Rowling complained on X.
Rowling once took aim at Watson for not calling her when the threats against her were at their peak
I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic and comfortable to them. I’d march with you if you were discriminated against on the basis of being trans. At the same time, my life has been shaped by being female. I do not believe it’s hateful to say so.
— J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) June 6, 2020
Image credits: jkrowling
The part that Rowling begrudged Watson for was having a note passed to her when she (Watson) had her (Rowling’s) number, and could have called at any time before, during, and after the social media savagery, but did not.
The nine trans women included in this year’s lineup are British media personalities Munroe Bergdorf, Shon Faye, Bel Priestley, Munya, Ceval Omar, Taira, Dani St James, Maxine Heron, and Mya Mehmi.
Another netizen finds the term dolls “creepy and repellent”
Image credits: rejserin
Image credits: LeandadeLisle
Image credits: CCAngelKing
Image credits: ZubyMusic
Image credits: jeanettedenise
Image credits: Ego_eimi_outis
Image credits: d_shawstein
Image credits: seanbwparker
Image credits: _mandy_murphy_
Image credits: ChazSmith
Image credits: ACaragoli
Image credits: Wouter_Raffel
Image credits: KidayaG
Image credits: Cyberbloke
Image credits: crit_gen
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
The magazines don't "tell girls girls that men are better at being women than they are". They're telling trans girls that they are fantastic women too. Trans women are simply people who are women on the inside but had the misfortune of being born with a body that doesn't fit their soul, and they deserve to be accepted as the women they are in their hearts. In today's world, where trans people are being used as scapegoats by people who are angry at the world, it's good that magazines celebrate trans women too. Being trans is already hard enough without having to deal with all the hate, they deserve a bit of extra recognition. Trans women are not men, they're women who used to have a male body.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Load More Replies...Saying that trans women are "men in disguise" is denying their gender as women and is transphobic. She said it, her words, no one can deny that anymore. (also I'm a biological woman and she doesn't speak for me, or my mother, or my aunt, or every biological woman I know).
I'll say the same thing about J.K. Rowling that I said about Ann Rice many years ago: Shut up and write your books. NO ONE cares about your so-called, "Social commentary". (Edited to fix typo.)
Writers have an important political role because what they write can reveal issues about your society and raise awareness (Like Susan Collins with the Hunger Games serie or every book Georges Orwell ever wrote) but it shouldn't be made at the expense of human's rights.
Load More Replies...She throws a lot of shade for someone whose entire face has been replaced via surgery
Wow. The results of the poll question are scary. At the moment I am writing this it's 63% that say "No, it undermines the purpose of a woman’s award." Are there really that many transphobes here on BP???
Trans “women” are not women. Cope and seethe if you cannot handle basic reality. 100 years from now people will look back at this short moment of mass insanity and wonder how people were so stupid.
I think that there is no harm in putting an oppressed minority on a cover by themselves. Much like covers with only black people, gay people or disabled people, it show that those people exist on a various spectrum and that they are all human worthy of respect. The cover wanted to celebrate a specific subject, the Dolls, and that's what they did.
Load More Replies...No, it's not nearly that simple. The ruling applies ONLY to the terms of the Equality Act, and states that changing your s*x in real life does not change your s*x for the purposes of the Equality Act, which assumes that your s*x is fixed at birth. Gender is irrelevant to the ruling. However, a Gender Recognition Certificate is still valid for all purposes except those of sexual discrimination under the Equality Act.
Load More Replies..."Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them", chapter 20
Load More Replies...Ah yes, a little nod there to one of the key planks of twentieth century neoNazi discourse. Instructive, isn't it, how people, having decided to be intolerant of one minority, rapidly progress to be intolerant of them all...
Load More Replies...Quick and honest question, what do you think about covers composed of only black people ?
Load More Replies...The magazines don't "tell girls girls that men are better at being women than they are". They're telling trans girls that they are fantastic women too. Trans women are simply people who are women on the inside but had the misfortune of being born with a body that doesn't fit their soul, and they deserve to be accepted as the women they are in their hearts. In today's world, where trans people are being used as scapegoats by people who are angry at the world, it's good that magazines celebrate trans women too. Being trans is already hard enough without having to deal with all the hate, they deserve a bit of extra recognition. Trans women are not men, they're women who used to have a male body.
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Load More Replies...Saying that trans women are "men in disguise" is denying their gender as women and is transphobic. She said it, her words, no one can deny that anymore. (also I'm a biological woman and she doesn't speak for me, or my mother, or my aunt, or every biological woman I know).
I'll say the same thing about J.K. Rowling that I said about Ann Rice many years ago: Shut up and write your books. NO ONE cares about your so-called, "Social commentary". (Edited to fix typo.)
Writers have an important political role because what they write can reveal issues about your society and raise awareness (Like Susan Collins with the Hunger Games serie or every book Georges Orwell ever wrote) but it shouldn't be made at the expense of human's rights.
Load More Replies...She throws a lot of shade for someone whose entire face has been replaced via surgery
Wow. The results of the poll question are scary. At the moment I am writing this it's 63% that say "No, it undermines the purpose of a woman’s award." Are there really that many transphobes here on BP???
Trans “women” are not women. Cope and seethe if you cannot handle basic reality. 100 years from now people will look back at this short moment of mass insanity and wonder how people were so stupid.
I think that there is no harm in putting an oppressed minority on a cover by themselves. Much like covers with only black people, gay people or disabled people, it show that those people exist on a various spectrum and that they are all human worthy of respect. The cover wanted to celebrate a specific subject, the Dolls, and that's what they did.
Load More Replies...No, it's not nearly that simple. The ruling applies ONLY to the terms of the Equality Act, and states that changing your s*x in real life does not change your s*x for the purposes of the Equality Act, which assumes that your s*x is fixed at birth. Gender is irrelevant to the ruling. However, a Gender Recognition Certificate is still valid for all purposes except those of sexual discrimination under the Equality Act.
Load More Replies..."Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them", chapter 20
Load More Replies...Ah yes, a little nod there to one of the key planks of twentieth century neoNazi discourse. Instructive, isn't it, how people, having decided to be intolerant of one minority, rapidly progress to be intolerant of them all...
Load More Replies...Quick and honest question, what do you think about covers composed of only black people ?
Load More Replies...























2
50