Person Quits After 3 Days Of Work After They Realized The Hybrid Work Model Was A Lie
In recent years, the option to work remotely has been a godsend for countless companies. It has kept high risk individuals safer during the pandemic, allowed families to spend more time together and simplified many workers’ days by eliminating commute times and costs. (Not to mention that nobody knows if you’re wearing pajama pants on a Zoom call, right?) While some businesses have recently returned to their offices, having flexibility to work from home has become a dealbreaker for many employees.
So when Reddit user InfamousCommission38 applied for a new job, the promise of a “hybrid” work environment was extremely appealing. Unfortunately, this week they found themselves recounting the tale of their short-lived position on the Antiwork subreddit. With 1.9 million members, r/Antiwork boasts the tagline “Unemployment for all, not just the rich!” and provides a space for fed up employees to bond. Keep reading to see InfamousCommission38’s frustrating encounter, similar stories from r/Antiwork and our exclusive interview with Dr. Lynne Kennette, a Professor of Psychology at Durham College. Then check out some of Bored Panda‘s other stories featuring remote work and terrible bosses!
After being promised a “hybrid” work environment, this employee was shocked to hear that working remotely was only allowed after 5pm
As the pandemic forced companies to adapt to remote work, many employees feel this lifestyle has actually benefitted them. A 2020 survey found that 80% of respondents believe having a job with flexibility allows them time to better care for their mental health. 92% of them even believe a flexible job makes them a happier person. An important benefit many note from working from home is reduction in stress levels. Over three quarters of employees surveyed reported that workplace stress negatively impacts their mental health, which can be mitigated by working from home. Not having to fight traffic twice a day and getting an additional half hour of sleep can go a long way in improving quality of life. That extra time can be used to take your dog for a walk, catch up with a friend, prepare healthier meals or read a few more chapters of that book you’ve been dying to finish.
In their article “Healthier at Home“, Dr. Lynne N. Kennette and Dr. Phoebe S. Lin explored the many psychological benefits of working remotely. They mention that simple advantages of being at home such as sitting closer to more windows can improve employees’ moods. Other factors that may cause stress in an office are much simpler to manage at home as well. Pregnant employees rushing to the bathroom with morning sickness and new mothers needing to find time to pump will have a much easier time at home. Caring for children in general becomes easier with a more flexible schedule, noted Kennette and Lin. Limiting time around toxic coworkers can also be a game changer in employee morale. Unfortunately, prejudices persist in some offices, but staying in the comfort of their homes allows groups often discriminated against, such as members of minority religious groups and transgender employees, a safer work environment.
In her interview with Bored Panda, Dr. Kennette told us that common misconceptions about working from home are that it’s easier or less work. “I know that I likely put in more hours working from home because I am less distracted,” she told us. “I don’t have colleagues popping into my office to tell me about their weekend, or to ask about my family.” “I really enjoy chatting with my colleagues, but it takes away from my work time!” she added. “And if you’re sick (or your child is), you are far less likely to use a sick day if you’re working remotely, so again, productivity is likely to be less affected by remote work than the traditional in-person office working conditions.” She’s right. Over the course of a two-year study, Professor Nicholas Bloom at Stanford University found that “employees working from home actually accomplished more of a ‘true’ full shift each day, as they didn’t use up time getting ready, commuting, leaving the office multiple times, or being late”. Companies even cut costs by eliminating the need to rent huge office spaces, making remote working a win for everyone.
Responses from readers are filled with shared frustration and support
Unfortunately many readers had similar experiences to share
We asked Dr. Kennette if she had any advice on incentivizing supervisors who are hesitant to let employees work remotely. She warns that it is a difficult topic to navigate, but “if you approach your supervisor with some research data that supports it as a viable option for you… then I think many will be open to at least having a conversation about it”. She also suggests proposing a “test period” of working remotely to see how it goes first. Although it’s no guarantee of change, Dr. Kennette still encourages employees to ask for what they believe will better their productivity and morale. “Good supervisors want to keep good employees,” she told us. “So I don’t think it hurts to ask for the working conditions that you think will make you a better employee for the company. And even if the answer is ‘no’ right now, it doesn’t mean you can’t bring it up again in the future.”
When asked if working from home is for everyone, Dr. Kennette was clear that, while it does not serve every situation, it is a nuanced topic. She shared with us words of wisdom about how important it can be to just have a say. “When you are forced into a work arrangement, you’re less likely to be happy about it. If you have some choice in the matter, however, not only will you be happier about it, but you’re also likely to be more productive because you want to work for that company and you do it well because you have some control over your own life and work.” She went on to explain that “even if you are forced to work hybrid, but you get to choose which days you come in, that’ll be better because you have a choice”. She elaborated on our desire for options with an example many of us can relate to. “It’s similar to how most parents manage their young (and even older) children. You don’t have a choice about whether you put your boots on or not, but you can choose which pair of boots, or whether you put the left one or the right one on first. Any time we are given some choice (or an illusion of choice!) we’re more likely to be happy about the outcome and consequently work better/harder.”
Other members of r/Antiwork have shared their experiences of dealing with misleading employers
Some employers wait until the last minute to finally be honest about the work schedule
Image credits: Formal_Appointment75
Despite the numerous benefits of working from home, there are a few challenges to be aware of. Some employees find it difficult to stop working when the clock strikes 5pm because they aren’t in a hurry to get home. Lines can become blurred when your home and office occupy the same space, so employees must set boundaries. One tip to keep your house from becoming a constant reminder of your job is to have a designated area where you work, that ideally can be avoided after hours. Of course, not everyone has the luxury of an entire room for an office, but even a small desk or corner of a room dedicated to “work hours only” can help. Setting strict boundaries like this can make it easier to turn on your professional persona when needed and relax when the work day is done.
Another tip CNBC suggests for preventing burnout is to have a “start-up” and “shut-down” routine for every working day. It can be jarring for your commute to shrink to the 15 steps between your bedroom and office. Something as simple as putting on a nicer outfit in the morning then changing into cozier clothes at the end of the day can help your brain adjust. Maybe in the morning you feel more energized to begin work after having a cup of coffee and reading the news. Routines are comforting, and it’s important to provide our bodies time to smoothly transition in and out of work mode.
Members of r/Antiwork are warning others to read job descriptions closely and call out employers when their job postings are inaccurate
Image credits: JustLikeCatnip
Image credits: JustLikeCatnip
Having a healthy work-life balance is vital for mental health and longevity in our careers. In this age of working from home, many employees have tasted the benefits of remote jobs and are refusing to return to traditional office culture. We hope that you too have a flexible work schedule that allows you time to take care of yourself and enjoy your life.
Have you ever had to defend yourself to an employer who misled you, like in the stories above? If so, we’d love to hear in the comments how you were able to stick it to the man!
Bottom line is: if the employer can’t confidently tell you that it’s a remote job, be skeptical
Image credits: LowDownYeet
387Kviews
Share on FacebookAre all US businesses run by idiots, morons and sociopaths? Or is it just the majority of them? Really, the number and frequency of topics about how badly US employees are treated by US employers is getting insane. It makes me think that all the "freedom" that this "great nation" is so proud about, comes down to the freedom of a select group of people to treat other people like shyte.
Precisely right. The only thing you forgot are these same employers whining about, "Nobody wants to work anymore!"
Load More Replies...It used to be that people would lie to get a job. Now jobs lie to get people.
OK, "work from home after 5 pm" is of course total b******t, but if I were looking for a hybrid job and actually wanted to work more than 50% (MWF) from home, I would bring this up early in the interview process to see if that is ok. Often WFH means you can work one day remotely, not more than half the time.
That job wasn't phrased as "WFH is OK sometimes" it was described as "hybrid". A hybrid is usually half and half.
Load More Replies...My job is pulling this. We were told that a position would be work from home, even though recently we were told WFH was not allowed. So I pushed and pushed for clarification, and they finally said, "Well, if it's after 5 or on weekends, they can work from home!". That's not what that means...
Long before WFH became a thing, I requested the accommodation because of a mystery illness that made me miss more hours at work. Everyone knew I was a workaholic, so missing days at a time was not typical for me. Each time I made an informal inquiry, word would come down the chain that our work was suitable for leaving the office. Finally, my doctors told me that going to work was causing too much stress on my body, and they suggested applying for long-term disability if my job would not allow me to WFH. I sent a formal letter up the chain requesting a WFH schedule with two or three half days in the office. I noted that the request was pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act, thus requiring a formal written response with the justification for denial. A month later, I opened a certified letter that essentially said, your extended sick leave is terminated.
Return to work ready to work 80-hour pay periods (the government can work flex hours like that), or we will place you in a non-pay status and begin processing your termination. Please note that the previous denials requesting accommodations are a part of this notice. We do not believe your illness constitutes a disability. Therefore, ADA does not apply. Before the curse words left my mouth, I emailed my disability retirement application to HR and dropped the one for Social Security at their office that day. It took 18 months, but both approved disability based on the totality of the medical records. Six months later, a hurricane ripped parts of the office to shreds. After that, 80% of the office was WFH. A year later, they had a process to deliver paper documents via FedEx. Once per month, the documents went to a different office for electronic scanning. It looks to me like the job was well-suited for WFH.
Load More Replies...This is nothing new. When I was in my late-late teens I took a job that stated there would be no weekend work. I informed the manager I could not work weekends. She agreed that it wouldn't be a problem, I would not have to work weekends. I hadn't been out of training and on the job 3-days when she informed me I would be on shift that weekend. I reminded her of our conversation during the interview and she had the psycho balls to look me right in the eye and claim she never said that. I wouldn't have taken the job if I had known. I gave my 2-week (I was young and dumb) and she "fired" me and put me on a "No Hire" List for the company. Out of curiosity I applied for a job there last year; they didn't even call me back. I'm still on the No-Hire list over 10 years later. To this day, I make it a firm policy to never work for a Liar. If you lie to me, about anything, I walk about.
As a fed govt worker I have found this to be true long before covid. Several postings about flexi telework or full telework - I ask about it in the interview & it's confirmed then start the job only to be told "oh we only allow tw for supv or mgr roles" or "tw is only allowed on a certain day & only if no one else is teleworking & only if the whole chain of command agrees" or another one told me "tw is only available after being here 2 years" - this was after being burned once and making sure to get tw promise in writing as I was leaving job that I had flexi tw where depending on if I was needed in the office for an in person meeting otherwise I was at home. They swore up & down they understood & position was full tw except for dept mtg twice a month. Only to get past training & told no I have to wait till I have been in service two years. I proceed to fight with HR & mgmt to no avail. Left to work with state govt that's 75% telework & feds hr asking me why are you leaving? LOL
This is why we need a law pretty much stating all work is done by basic contract and the contract itself should be the job posting, because otherwise there is no incentive for a company to tell the truth about a job before hiring as they can just shuffle thru employees to get the work done and never have to pay out anything but background checks and drug screens while trying to slip in somewhere that if you don't give 2 weeks they will dock your last paycheck to minimum wage and use that to cover the screen and background check and its all legal.
My last job was a hell, started my own company because of it. Occasionally I look at joboffers. I'm not a dumb guy, but there is so much hot air in those texts that I simply don't understand what the hell they are actually offering. If they can't write a normal ad, why even bother trying to respond in a way that is in line with that blurb?
I took a contract (temporary, full time) job where I was initially told I could work from home one day a week (but not Friday, never Friday, because "Three-day weekend, no way"). So, it was clear that the manager didn't trust the employees, but I needed the job and I wasn't going to be an employee. Then, when I started, it turned out he'd lied, because I was a contractor, so I did a time card and he couldn't trust me to work from home at all. It was a short job. (I ended up having the contract terminated early because I wasn't getting the project finished "fast enough" (they kept changing the parameters), but then I got unemployment.
Two different stories: One, I was hired for M-F 8-5. I have health issues, and I was starting to have more and more frequent seizures at work. The nature of the work was very cyclical, there could be hours or days where there was nothing to do, so we'd be sent home early or told not to come in at all. Because of my health issues, I had a meeting with my boss and her boss to see if they'd be willing to give me scheduling accommodations--I could do M-F 8-noon, M-F 1-5, MWF 8-5, or just stay home entirely when it was slow, and do M-F 8-5 when it was busy. They acted like those accommodations were the most ridiculous thing they'd ever heard, and reiterated that "We hired you for M-F 8-5!" They seemed very surprised when I said, "Well, then, consider this my resignation," and I quit.
Second incident: I'm disabled and I can't drive, so I was preferably looking for remote work, or at least something I could do entirely in an office setting, no travel. I applied for a "customer service" job with an insurance agency. Turned out that it involved literally traveling to accident sites to talk to customers who'd just had a fenderbender. Since I can't drive, I politely told the interviewer that wouldn't work, and we ended the interview amicably. A couple of days later, I get a call from a different lady, at the same insurance agency, about the same job. I reminded her that I'd already told the first interviewer that I wouldn't be a good fit, because I can't drive. She gasped and said, "Oh--I just thought you meant that you didn't *like* to drive!" Facepalm...
Load More Replies...Even service industry jobs are playing that game now. They claim 'remote" in the ad but what that really means when you did into it is that the position is actually a 1099 contractor position with no benefits and "remote means you are dispatched from home. In some cases, you are expected to supply your own vehicle but carry liability insurance (at your expense) that is to usually upto 1 miiion of coverage.
You can work from home full time with my business. Two weeks of in-office training to start is all i ask. Maybe drop by if you have payments or paperwork. Good pay. No takers. I have no idea what people think they are getting out of a job, but these stories here, mostly BS, and designed to make it seem like only bosses are asses.
Lost my job as the move to remote took on. Company decided to downsize as they were going fully remote. Took me a rough 6months before I got a couple of serious offers. Both a hundred miles away. First would have paid decently and I could drive daily for a few months then start maybe doing a week at a long term hotel while I looked for a place. They decided against it. The other was a state job paying about 5k less than my previous employer. At least gas was a little cheaper for awhile but I put in about a year and my old employer had a position. Got it easily along with a 10k raise to what I was making currently. My boss tried to sell me on staying with the state because I'd learn more. They couldn't match it obviously. Almost 6 months later he hit me up asking if I'd be willing to return. I reminded him my offer figure and fully remote. The counter : hybrid work with 2 days in office and only 3k less money than now plus the 100 mile drives again.
I'm currently working at a job with a hybrid model (MT remote, WTF in office) ... problem is, I'm in IT and we always have to have a presence so with two technicians, we end up splitting the remote days so that we both work 4 days a week instead of 3 like everybody else ...
Applied as a temp for a job that had offices in Connecticut and New York City ... the description called for 2 positions, one for each location ... a week after, I'm sent to Connecticut (accessible via 2 hour train ride) and found out that both positions were for that location after the first week ... didn't bother going back the next day ... they tried to argue that I also lied when I told them that I had to take Thursday's off to care for my children while their mother was going to therapy, but this agreed to during the interview with a sense of sympathy ... in any case, that bridge with the recruiter was burnt ...
The job located in Pennsylvania might actually be remote but only if the person resides in Pennsylvania. That’s because you have to be registered in each state where you have people working and pay taxes/ follow employment rules for that state. If you are a small company with one worker in that state, it’s probably not worth the aggravation and many companies restrict where their remote employees are located. This is fairly common so my reply to the applicant who wanted to report the job posting as false would be “Good luck with that.”
GenZ, you better wake up to the words, "at-will". Employers don't owe you anything. It is your responsibility to "get it writing" at the time of your interview. If the employer changes their policy, it is what it is. Going to the office won't kill you. The other option for being picky is to continue to live at home with your parents until you find something steady. As a blue collar retiree, not going to work is not an option and nowadays we get paid just as much as you with benefits and a bargaining unit.
As someone who has always had to commute to my job, cry me a f-ing river...
A lying company is a lying company. That's something you would have to deal with too.
Load More Replies...You sound jealous and you talk like you need a truck and a mustache to feel manly
Load More Replies...So have I. Asking for basic rights and a living wage isn't whining. Nor is asking the employer to be truthful. Sad troll is obvious ..
Load More Replies...Are all US businesses run by idiots, morons and sociopaths? Or is it just the majority of them? Really, the number and frequency of topics about how badly US employees are treated by US employers is getting insane. It makes me think that all the "freedom" that this "great nation" is so proud about, comes down to the freedom of a select group of people to treat other people like shyte.
Precisely right. The only thing you forgot are these same employers whining about, "Nobody wants to work anymore!"
Load More Replies...It used to be that people would lie to get a job. Now jobs lie to get people.
OK, "work from home after 5 pm" is of course total b******t, but if I were looking for a hybrid job and actually wanted to work more than 50% (MWF) from home, I would bring this up early in the interview process to see if that is ok. Often WFH means you can work one day remotely, not more than half the time.
That job wasn't phrased as "WFH is OK sometimes" it was described as "hybrid". A hybrid is usually half and half.
Load More Replies...My job is pulling this. We were told that a position would be work from home, even though recently we were told WFH was not allowed. So I pushed and pushed for clarification, and they finally said, "Well, if it's after 5 or on weekends, they can work from home!". That's not what that means...
Long before WFH became a thing, I requested the accommodation because of a mystery illness that made me miss more hours at work. Everyone knew I was a workaholic, so missing days at a time was not typical for me. Each time I made an informal inquiry, word would come down the chain that our work was suitable for leaving the office. Finally, my doctors told me that going to work was causing too much stress on my body, and they suggested applying for long-term disability if my job would not allow me to WFH. I sent a formal letter up the chain requesting a WFH schedule with two or three half days in the office. I noted that the request was pursuant to the Americans With Disabilities Act, thus requiring a formal written response with the justification for denial. A month later, I opened a certified letter that essentially said, your extended sick leave is terminated.
Return to work ready to work 80-hour pay periods (the government can work flex hours like that), or we will place you in a non-pay status and begin processing your termination. Please note that the previous denials requesting accommodations are a part of this notice. We do not believe your illness constitutes a disability. Therefore, ADA does not apply. Before the curse words left my mouth, I emailed my disability retirement application to HR and dropped the one for Social Security at their office that day. It took 18 months, but both approved disability based on the totality of the medical records. Six months later, a hurricane ripped parts of the office to shreds. After that, 80% of the office was WFH. A year later, they had a process to deliver paper documents via FedEx. Once per month, the documents went to a different office for electronic scanning. It looks to me like the job was well-suited for WFH.
Load More Replies...This is nothing new. When I was in my late-late teens I took a job that stated there would be no weekend work. I informed the manager I could not work weekends. She agreed that it wouldn't be a problem, I would not have to work weekends. I hadn't been out of training and on the job 3-days when she informed me I would be on shift that weekend. I reminded her of our conversation during the interview and she had the psycho balls to look me right in the eye and claim she never said that. I wouldn't have taken the job if I had known. I gave my 2-week (I was young and dumb) and she "fired" me and put me on a "No Hire" List for the company. Out of curiosity I applied for a job there last year; they didn't even call me back. I'm still on the No-Hire list over 10 years later. To this day, I make it a firm policy to never work for a Liar. If you lie to me, about anything, I walk about.
As a fed govt worker I have found this to be true long before covid. Several postings about flexi telework or full telework - I ask about it in the interview & it's confirmed then start the job only to be told "oh we only allow tw for supv or mgr roles" or "tw is only allowed on a certain day & only if no one else is teleworking & only if the whole chain of command agrees" or another one told me "tw is only available after being here 2 years" - this was after being burned once and making sure to get tw promise in writing as I was leaving job that I had flexi tw where depending on if I was needed in the office for an in person meeting otherwise I was at home. They swore up & down they understood & position was full tw except for dept mtg twice a month. Only to get past training & told no I have to wait till I have been in service two years. I proceed to fight with HR & mgmt to no avail. Left to work with state govt that's 75% telework & feds hr asking me why are you leaving? LOL
This is why we need a law pretty much stating all work is done by basic contract and the contract itself should be the job posting, because otherwise there is no incentive for a company to tell the truth about a job before hiring as they can just shuffle thru employees to get the work done and never have to pay out anything but background checks and drug screens while trying to slip in somewhere that if you don't give 2 weeks they will dock your last paycheck to minimum wage and use that to cover the screen and background check and its all legal.
My last job was a hell, started my own company because of it. Occasionally I look at joboffers. I'm not a dumb guy, but there is so much hot air in those texts that I simply don't understand what the hell they are actually offering. If they can't write a normal ad, why even bother trying to respond in a way that is in line with that blurb?
I took a contract (temporary, full time) job where I was initially told I could work from home one day a week (but not Friday, never Friday, because "Three-day weekend, no way"). So, it was clear that the manager didn't trust the employees, but I needed the job and I wasn't going to be an employee. Then, when I started, it turned out he'd lied, because I was a contractor, so I did a time card and he couldn't trust me to work from home at all. It was a short job. (I ended up having the contract terminated early because I wasn't getting the project finished "fast enough" (they kept changing the parameters), but then I got unemployment.
Two different stories: One, I was hired for M-F 8-5. I have health issues, and I was starting to have more and more frequent seizures at work. The nature of the work was very cyclical, there could be hours or days where there was nothing to do, so we'd be sent home early or told not to come in at all. Because of my health issues, I had a meeting with my boss and her boss to see if they'd be willing to give me scheduling accommodations--I could do M-F 8-noon, M-F 1-5, MWF 8-5, or just stay home entirely when it was slow, and do M-F 8-5 when it was busy. They acted like those accommodations were the most ridiculous thing they'd ever heard, and reiterated that "We hired you for M-F 8-5!" They seemed very surprised when I said, "Well, then, consider this my resignation," and I quit.
Second incident: I'm disabled and I can't drive, so I was preferably looking for remote work, or at least something I could do entirely in an office setting, no travel. I applied for a "customer service" job with an insurance agency. Turned out that it involved literally traveling to accident sites to talk to customers who'd just had a fenderbender. Since I can't drive, I politely told the interviewer that wouldn't work, and we ended the interview amicably. A couple of days later, I get a call from a different lady, at the same insurance agency, about the same job. I reminded her that I'd already told the first interviewer that I wouldn't be a good fit, because I can't drive. She gasped and said, "Oh--I just thought you meant that you didn't *like* to drive!" Facepalm...
Load More Replies...Even service industry jobs are playing that game now. They claim 'remote" in the ad but what that really means when you did into it is that the position is actually a 1099 contractor position with no benefits and "remote means you are dispatched from home. In some cases, you are expected to supply your own vehicle but carry liability insurance (at your expense) that is to usually upto 1 miiion of coverage.
You can work from home full time with my business. Two weeks of in-office training to start is all i ask. Maybe drop by if you have payments or paperwork. Good pay. No takers. I have no idea what people think they are getting out of a job, but these stories here, mostly BS, and designed to make it seem like only bosses are asses.
Lost my job as the move to remote took on. Company decided to downsize as they were going fully remote. Took me a rough 6months before I got a couple of serious offers. Both a hundred miles away. First would have paid decently and I could drive daily for a few months then start maybe doing a week at a long term hotel while I looked for a place. They decided against it. The other was a state job paying about 5k less than my previous employer. At least gas was a little cheaper for awhile but I put in about a year and my old employer had a position. Got it easily along with a 10k raise to what I was making currently. My boss tried to sell me on staying with the state because I'd learn more. They couldn't match it obviously. Almost 6 months later he hit me up asking if I'd be willing to return. I reminded him my offer figure and fully remote. The counter : hybrid work with 2 days in office and only 3k less money than now plus the 100 mile drives again.
I'm currently working at a job with a hybrid model (MT remote, WTF in office) ... problem is, I'm in IT and we always have to have a presence so with two technicians, we end up splitting the remote days so that we both work 4 days a week instead of 3 like everybody else ...
Applied as a temp for a job that had offices in Connecticut and New York City ... the description called for 2 positions, one for each location ... a week after, I'm sent to Connecticut (accessible via 2 hour train ride) and found out that both positions were for that location after the first week ... didn't bother going back the next day ... they tried to argue that I also lied when I told them that I had to take Thursday's off to care for my children while their mother was going to therapy, but this agreed to during the interview with a sense of sympathy ... in any case, that bridge with the recruiter was burnt ...
The job located in Pennsylvania might actually be remote but only if the person resides in Pennsylvania. That’s because you have to be registered in each state where you have people working and pay taxes/ follow employment rules for that state. If you are a small company with one worker in that state, it’s probably not worth the aggravation and many companies restrict where their remote employees are located. This is fairly common so my reply to the applicant who wanted to report the job posting as false would be “Good luck with that.”
GenZ, you better wake up to the words, "at-will". Employers don't owe you anything. It is your responsibility to "get it writing" at the time of your interview. If the employer changes their policy, it is what it is. Going to the office won't kill you. The other option for being picky is to continue to live at home with your parents until you find something steady. As a blue collar retiree, not going to work is not an option and nowadays we get paid just as much as you with benefits and a bargaining unit.
As someone who has always had to commute to my job, cry me a f-ing river...
A lying company is a lying company. That's something you would have to deal with too.
Load More Replies...You sound jealous and you talk like you need a truck and a mustache to feel manly
Load More Replies...So have I. Asking for basic rights and a living wage isn't whining. Nor is asking the employer to be truthful. Sad troll is obvious ..
Load More Replies...
87
49