Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

BF Refuses To Help Pay For Parking Spot Since He Doesn’t Drive, Leaves GF Confused
780

Woman Asks If She's Wrong To Expect Blind BF To Help Pay For Parking Even Though He Doesn't Drive

ADVERTISEMENT

Every relationship requires people to compromise. Whether it’s about which side up the toilet paper should be or what to eat for dinner, couples have to learn to adjust as they live together. When one person in the relationship is differently abled, their partner might need to compromise more.

But is that always fair? One couple got into an argument over parking costs. The girlfriend felt it was fair that the boyfriend should pitch in to cover half of the fee, even though he is legally blind. However, he didn’t feel it was fair and refused. At first, the woman backed down but later started doubting her reaction. She weighed the reasons she thought his pitching in would be fair and decided to double-check with the Internet.

Blind people experience the world differently, so their partners might need to compromise more often

This girlfriend wanted her boyfriend to help cover parking costs, but he refused

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: bilanol / envatoelements (not the actual photo)

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: petruninsphotos / envatoelements (not the actual photo)

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Inside_Version4898

Image credits: KATRIN BOLOVTSOVA / pexels (not the actual photo)

The issue for this couple here seems to be about compromising rather than about the parking fee. Yes, the boyfriend might not be willing to spend his money on a service he doesn’t directly use. But the girlfriend’s list of things she conceded so that the couple could move to a place of the boyfriend’s choosing indicates that he might not be willing to compromise.

Experts point out that communication in relationships is key, especially when one person in the couple has a disability. Relationships are often about giving and taking, and it wouldn’t be fair to ask one person to make more sacrifices.

The author of Cleaning Up Your Mental Mess, Dr. Caroline Leaf, writes that compromise is not a one-way street. “Everyone involved needs to try to understand the other person and the reason they want something a certain way.”

From what the woman wrote in her post, it seems that she thinks she’s conceding more to her boyfriend’s demands because of his disability. And while perfect relationships don’t exist and it’s practically impossible to agree on everything all the time, partners can draw boundaries.

“The key is to find ways to give each other space to be individuals while being intentional about creating shared experiences and values that allow you both to connect meaningfully is important in any relationship,” Dr. Leaf writes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Judita Mikalkevičė / pexels (not the actual photo)

Relationships where one person has a disability, of course, differ from the ones where both partners are equally physically abled. Romantic relationships often become harder because of the disabled partner’s fear of dependency, loss of identity, and potentially diminished relationships.

Research shows that when couples think of the disability as shared, relationships might be more successful. Scientists call this ‘dyadic coping.’ Psychologist Isabella Bertschi led a study where she claimed that dyadic coping can help “alleviate stress and promote adjustment in couples who face disabling health impairments.”

However, achieving that we-ness is easier said than done. Mary Sanders, LMFT, told Next Avenue that the healthy partner might feel guilt and shame. “It’s very intimidating for them to share their fears, their grief and anger,” she said. They might think: “He’s going through so much: I don’t want to burden him with my feelings.”

Bertschi explains that it’s the opposite. Sharing doubts and fears can strengthen the relationship. Not communicating your needs and wants, she says, “undermines trust in the relationship.”

Perhaps, in this case, the boyfriend should consider dyadic coping. If the couple shares the struggles of his disability together, he could pitch in and help his girlfriend cover half of the parking fee, couldn’t he?

ADVERTISEMENT

People said the girlfriend wasn’t the jerk here, and the couple needed to discuss the issue more

ADVERTISEMENT
Poll icon

Poll Question

Thanks! Check out the results:

You May Also Like

Woman Refuses To Chip In For Babysitting Because She Doesn’t Even Have Kids, Asks If She’s A Jerk

Do you think childless individuals should be expected to chip in for group babysitting costs during friend gatherings?

Take the Poll

“They Saw The Blood Leave My Body”: Woman Refuses To Tip 10% At Bridal Store

How do you feel about the practice of tipping at a bridal store?

Take the Poll

17 Y.O. Is Done Sharing Her Birthday With Her Late Twin, Parents Are Not Having It

Do you think the girl should be allowed to celebrate her birthday without the remembrance of her deceased twin?

Take the Poll
Share on Facebook
You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
myronmog avatar
moggie63
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is easy. He doesn't feel as if he has any responsibility for the car so, when wants to go anywhere, charge him taxi rates. He's already decided that the move benefits him immensely and you're to go along with it even though you don't seem to be gaining anything from it. Your feelings are being ignored and it won't get any better. You know what to do.

ianbuhagiar_1 avatar
BewilderedBanana
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think the issue here is much deeper than whether he wants to split the cost of the parking spot or not. The move itself is the issue - OP doesn't want to move but is agreeing to move to make her partner happy (or at least happier). However, it sounds like she herself will be unhappy (or at least less happy than she is now). Compromise is important in a relationship, but this isn't compromise. Compromise would be moving somewhere where both parties are happy and feel safe. Being unhappy yourself to make your partner happy isn't compromise, it isn't healthy and will only breed resentment. Then the issue of not contributing to the parking spot is something else... quite selfish on his side i think, assuming he enjoys the benefits of owning the car as well.

kenbeattie avatar
Ken Beattie
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I hate to say it, but he sounds like he's weaponising his disability to some extent. Maybe without realising it, maybe deliberately. But he's getting her to make concessions because it'll be easier for him and she feels guilty not making those concessions. Not time to break up just yet, but they definitely need to have a more serious talk about expectations.

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
myronmog avatar
moggie63
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

This is easy. He doesn't feel as if he has any responsibility for the car so, when wants to go anywhere, charge him taxi rates. He's already decided that the move benefits him immensely and you're to go along with it even though you don't seem to be gaining anything from it. Your feelings are being ignored and it won't get any better. You know what to do.

ianbuhagiar_1 avatar
BewilderedBanana
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I think the issue here is much deeper than whether he wants to split the cost of the parking spot or not. The move itself is the issue - OP doesn't want to move but is agreeing to move to make her partner happy (or at least happier). However, it sounds like she herself will be unhappy (or at least less happy than she is now). Compromise is important in a relationship, but this isn't compromise. Compromise would be moving somewhere where both parties are happy and feel safe. Being unhappy yourself to make your partner happy isn't compromise, it isn't healthy and will only breed resentment. Then the issue of not contributing to the parking spot is something else... quite selfish on his side i think, assuming he enjoys the benefits of owning the car as well.

kenbeattie avatar
Ken Beattie
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I hate to say it, but he sounds like he's weaponising his disability to some extent. Maybe without realising it, maybe deliberately. But he's getting her to make concessions because it'll be easier for him and she feels guilty not making those concessions. Not time to break up just yet, but they definitely need to have a more serious talk about expectations.

Load More Replies...
Load More Comments
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda