When it comes to new movie releases, people’s eyes often turn to the box office in order to determine whether it was a success. If a film fails to break even by a large amount when it’s first released in the theaters, it is sadly considered a box office bomb or box office flop. While it’s common knowledge that movies that don’t make a profit are considered to be box office flops, the list doesn’t end there. Movies that don’t manage to exceed their expected profit and break by a large amount are sadly considered box office flops too.

However, some movies manage to turn it around later. Therefore, we compiled a list of well-known movies that started out as nothing but yet another box office flop. These are by no means everyone's favorites, but rather films that managed to get up after the initial disappointment at the box office and are now having constant TV re-runs or have found other ways to people's hearts and home screens.

#1

The Shawshank Redemption

The Shawshank Redemption

Budget: $25,000,000
Box office earnings: $28,428,150
When you think about The Shawshank Redemption, you probably think of it as an ageless classic and tribute it for cinematic immortality. However, it didn’t really pop at first. While it made a noble $3,428,150 when it came out, it is still considered one of the biggest box office fails. Despite it being well-received by critics, it only gained more significant popularity after making a splash at the Academy Awards. The makers of the film can now also enjoy successful home video sales.

Columbia Pictures Report

Troux
Community Member
9 months ago

The main thing that hurt this movie was that it debuted alongside Pulp Fiction, Clerks and not too long after Forrest Gump. It was simply overshadowed and it was never as marketable as the rest. The cast was not star-studded and the overall plotline isn't incredibly gripping. It's difficult to advertise good storytelling except by word of mouth!

View More Replies...
View more comments
#2

Blade Runner

Blade Runner

Budget: $28,000,000
Box office earnings: $39,342,912
The famous Ridley Scott’s science fiction film was first shown in theatres in 1982. Rotten Tomatoes claims the film “was a box office and critical bust upon its initial exhibition, but its unique postmodern production design became hugely influential within the sci-fi genre, and the film gained a significant cult following that increased its stature.” It remains a fan-favorite among science fiction fans and even got a sequel 35 years later.

Warner Bros Report

GFSTaylor
Community Member
9 months ago

Bladerunner was released in 1982.

View More Replies...
View more comments
#3

Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory

Willy Wonka & The Chocolate Factory

Budget: $3,000,000
Box office earnings: $4,000,000
This American musical came out in 1971 starring Gene Wilder as Willy Wonka, but was seemingly overlooked by audiences at the time of its initial release. The now-iconic family classic had a budget of 3 million dollars, but only manage to make one million dollars profit during its original theatrical release. However, it seems people only needed some time to start to appreciate this gem.

Paramount Pictures Report

columbokateUK
Community Member
9 months ago

I wouldn't watch any film with gene wilder for years because of this film! He's terrifying 😶

View More Replies...
View more comments
#4

Stardust

Stardust

Budget: $70,000,000
Box office earnings: $137,515,140
Matthew Vaughn’s romantic fantasy adventure released in 2007 is based on Neil Gaiman's 1999 novel of the same name and stars Claire Danes, Charlie Cox, Sienna Miller, Ricky Gervais, Michelle Pfeiffer, Robert De Niro, and a few other great stars. It was off to a decent start with good critical reviews. However, it didn’t earn its lot at the box office, especially in the US. However, it found a way to fans’ hearts via various streaming services and has earned a cult following since its initial release.

Paramount Pictures Report

Ilir Ajdini
Community Member
9 months ago

I liked this movie very much. Claire Danes shined in her role of a star

View More Replies...
View more comments
#5

It's A Wonderful Life

It's A Wonderful Life

Budget: $3,180,000
Box office earnings: $3,300,000
While this 1946 Christmas fantasy drama is now considered to be a cinematic classic, it faced a rocky start at the beginning. With a $3.7 million dollar budget, it only managed to earn back $3.3 million. However, it didn’t have to wait long for the success as it was nominated for five Academy Awards the same year and remains one of people’s favorite Christmas movies of all time.

Liberty Films Report

Aunt Messy
Community Member
9 months ago

I hate this movie. I know I'm probably the only one who does, but it's a tear jerky smarm fest with virtually no redeeming features. Also...it's boring as hell.

View More Replies...
View more comments
#6

Fight Club

Fight Club

Budget: $63,000,000
Box office earnings: $101,187,503
Despite how hard to believe this movie actually made this list and the fact that probably most people consider it to be an undying cinematic classic at this point, Fight Club didn’t really do that well at the box office when it first came out in 1999. Despite that technically it didn’t make a loss at the box office, it didn’t live up to the expectations at first and wasn’t immediately financially successful. However, it managed to turn it around and become one of the generation-defining movies for many millennials.

20th Century Fox Report

Bill Taylor
Community Member
9 months ago

I must be the only male to not like this film.

View More Replies...
View more comments
#7

Hocus Pocus

Hocus Pocus

Budget: $28,000,000
Box office earnings: $39,514,713
Even though this 1993 American comedy horror film is now watched all around the world during Halloween and has become a seasonal favorite, it was released during summer. It received mostly negative and mixed reviews from critics upon its release and lost Disney approximately $16.5 million. However, becoming a seasonal favorite, which resulted in a yearly spike in home video sales, turned Hocus Pocus into a commercial success after all.

Buena Vista Pictures Report

Ilir Ajdini
Community Member
9 months ago

I have never heard about this movie...

View More Replies...
View more comments
#8

Donnie Darko

Donnie Darko

Budget: $6,000,000
Box office earnings: $2,962,988
This unique debut from Richard Kelly reached theaters in 2001. Despite having an uncanny script and amazing cast, it only stayed on cinema screens for 28 days, only made $2,962,988 at the box office, and thus didn’t even manage to even out the cost of production, which was $6,000,000. However, this failure might be related not only to the film and its marketing, but also to the fact that the film came out shortly after the 9/11 tragedy and featured a pretty prominent plane crash in its storyline. Despite that, it received critical acclaim and a surprising financial success on the home video market and has developed a cult following since its initial release.

Newmarket Films Report

Aunt Messy
Community Member
9 months ago

That gave me nightmares for YEARS. I will never look at a rabbit the same way again.

View More Replies...
View more comments
#9

Matilda

Matilda

Budget: $36,000,000
Box office earnings: $33,459,416
Even though this 1996 family comedy-drama, based on Roald Dahl’s novel of the same name, has become a fan favorite over the years, it was first released to a rocky start. Despite having received positive reviews from critics, it was a complete box office flop, grossing only $33 million in the United States on a $36 million budget. Thankfully, it got a new life and cult audiences with TV reruns and even became quite successful in the home video market.

TriStar Pictures Report

Oskar vanZandt
Community Member
9 months ago

Great family film... fine adaptation of Roald Dahl's story.

View more comments
#10

Heathers

Heathers

Budget: $3,000,000
Box office earnings: $1,108,462
Some like to poetically say that Heathers walked so that Mean Girls and similar chick flicks could run. While the film had mostly positive critical feedback, it didn’t help it gain success among theater audiences. With a budget of an estimated $3,000,000, Heathers only grossed $1,108,462 at the box office. It took some time for people to appreciate the genius behind the film, but people learned to love it since its initial release in 1989 and it now has a cult following.

New World Pictures Report

PyroarRanger
Community Member
9 months ago

How very!

View More Replies...
View more comments
#11

Kubo And The Two Strings

Kubo And The Two Strings

Budget: $60,000,000
Box office earnings: $76,249,438
This stop-motion animated action-fantasy film seemed to have all it takes – it was voiced by such A-listers as Charlize Theron, Rooney Mara, Matthew McConaughey, and Ralph Fiennes and was released to critical acclaim. However, grossing only $77 million worldwide against a budget of $60 million, it is still considered to be one of the biggest box office disappointments. Despite that, fantasy fans all over the world seem to appreciate the stop-motion aesthetic and brilliant writing, making it fans’ favorite.

Focus Features Report

glowworm2
Community Member
9 months ago

The problem with Laika's stop motion films is that while they are beautifully and painstakingly made and extremely creative, they don't advertise nearly as much as Disney, Pixar and Dreamworks do in order to make their films more well known. I always enjoy their films though.

View More Replies...
View more comments
See Also on Bored Panda
#12

Scott Pilgrim vs. The World

Scott Pilgrim vs. The World

Budget: $60,000,000
Box office earnings: $47,664,559
Some say this 2010s comedy was never destined for success and was hard to sell to mainstream audiences from the beginning. Peter Debruge of Variety gave the film a mixed review, and called it "an example of attention-deficit filmmaking at both its finest and its most frustrating". Despite it having a budget of $60,000,000 and flopping at box office by only earning $47,664,559, it managed to find its active audience a bit later and is now praised for having killer-cast, extraordinary aesthetics and a script with endless possibilities for quoting.

Universal Pictures Report

Vanta Black
Community Member
9 months ago

"We are Sex Bob-omb, and we're here to watch Scott Pilgrim kick your teeth in! 1234!"

View more comments
#13

The Man From U.N.C.L.E.

The Man From U.N.C.L.E.

Budget: $75,000,000
Box office earnings: $107,045,109
This 2015 spy film directed by Guy Ritchie had a pretty incredible crew and an A-lister cast starring Henry Cavill, Armie Hammer, Alicia Vikander, and Hugh Grant. However, it seems that having these two things settled is often not enough for a film to be a box office success. The Hollywood Reporter estimated the film lost the studio at least $80 million when factoring together all expenses and revenues.

Warner Bros Report

Ilir Ajdini
Community Member
9 months ago

Most of Guy Ritchie's other works are much better than this one, I think. Except "Swept Away", of course

View More Replies...
View more comments
#14

Almost Famous

Almost Famous

Budget: $60,000,000
Box office earnings: $47,383,689
Just as the name of this 2000 comedy-drama suggests, this film is… well, almost famous. It only grossed $47,383,689 worldwide against a budget of $60,000,000. Despite this box office disappointment, the film managed to reach its audiences since then and has become a fan favorite coming-of-age drama. Fans seem to love not only its wonderful cast, but its vintage aesthetics and honesty, too.

Sony Pictures Report

Bepina
Community Member
9 months ago

I still don't get the hype around this film. It's not bad but nothing special as well.

View more comments
#15

Blade Runner 2049

Blade Runner 2049

Budget: $150,000,000
Box office earnings: $259,239,658
Just like Blade Runner, Blade Runner 2049 didn’t receive its success immediately. It was expected to debut to an additional $60 million internationally (outside the US); however, the debut ended up making only $50.2 million and was considered a disappointment after its opening weekend. Maybe the audiences were just fed up with sci-fi movies at the time because it managed to turn fans around and found its way to home screens after leaving the theaters.

Warner Bros Report

Harold Summer
Community Member
9 months ago

Visually amazing, but unremarkable plot line. Can't even remember what happened.

Corey Smith
Community Member
9 months ago

I agree. Plus, I think people are getting tired of all the reboot/remakes.

Load More Replies...
CP
Community Member
9 months ago

This is a great movie. It was a more than worthy sequel.

Ray Heap
Community Member
9 months ago

There are two kinds of people in the world; those who understood Bladerunner and those who don´t.

Kevin Camp
Community Member
9 months ago

Like its predecessor, and lost amid the current crop of flow chart derived action movies, this movie was too intellectual for most. Compared the most action movies and especially the superhero genre wo employ very basic storylines and rely on special effects and action to carry the day, both Bladerunner movies require the audience to pay attention and think about what they are seeing and the allegories employed.

2WheelTravlr
Community Member
9 months ago

I need to give it another watch. I absolutely hated it when I saw it in the theater, even though the visuals were gorgeous I just thought the plotline was messy and unfocused.

Load More Replies...
Bill Taylor
Community Member
9 months ago

It's a Ryan Gosling thing for me, I've tried to like a movie he has been in, including LaLa Land, Blue Valentine, The Notebook, but no luck so far. I just don't like him as a leading man, not sure why Hollywood tries to push him on audiences.

Pittsburgh rare
Community Member
9 months ago

A wobbling trunk with googly eyes is more expressive than RG.

Load More Replies...
Steve Barnett
Community Member
9 months ago

Got bored after the first whatever minutes. Sorry, LOVE 'Bladerunner', but this sequel just did nothing for me. Sadly, also made me realise that Jared Leto isn't actually such a good actor after all (Okay, 'Dallas Buyers Club' withstanding). Sorry Jared, solely my own opinion.

TheReader19
Community Member
9 months ago (edited)

Hated this remake, it's reminds me of the crappy remake of Total Recall 😤

Efraim Ondrej Kubik
Community Member
8 months ago

Took me three views to fully appriciate the movie. Then I watched it like 20 times every day in a row, bought some collectible action figures of K and Deckard and fell in love with the universe :D

Jo Ellen Washburn
Community Member
9 months ago

Doesn't even come close to the original. No need for a remake.

Steve Cruz
Community Member
9 months ago

The gold standard running time for films is 1:52. This ran nearly an longer and shouldn't have. A version was on YouTube for almost a year before it was pulled that ran 1:40 and no dialogue was cut. The smartphone app "RunPee" usually lists 4–5 times during a movie when one could run and pee without missing much. RunPee lists over an hour of Pee time for this film.

Teodora L. Kostadinova
Community Member
9 months ago

I was very negative when I heard that there was going to be a sequel.I bought the ticket mentally prepared to be very disapointed, but then I actually cried my eyes out in the theater. Can't wait for Villeneuve's Dune.

Pittsburgh rare
Community Member
9 months ago

I love the original one, so I gave it a shot. The only highlight for me was Harrison Ford not giving a ****.

Hallak65
Community Member
9 months ago

It was beautiful, but way too long. If they cut 30 from it, it would be a masterpiece.

Max L.
Community Member
9 months ago

I loved it but it’s evidently made to honor the first chapter fans, which I belong to.

Elsa May
Community Member
9 months ago

I can't believe they made over 100 million dollars on that boring pile of turd

Jonathan Scargill
Community Member
9 months ago

Interesting thread but maybe we could have profit/loss for each movie?

Percil Duncan
Community Member
9 months ago

blade-runn...e9b286.gif blade-runner-2049-5ecf056e9b286.gif

Percil Duncan
Community Member
9 months ago

the dogs bollocks basically....

Percil Duncan
Community Member
9 months ago

the dogs bollocks

Chris DiFonso
Community Member
9 months ago

I thought this movie was very slow and very boring and a waste of time to watch.

Craymoss
Community Member
9 months ago

This remake sucked dirty diseased dead butthole. Just, no.

Mónica Elisabeth Sacco
Community Member
9 months ago

Ryan Gosslin sucks. Ruined the movie

Grumble O'Pug
Community Member
9 months ago

Just no.

View More Replies...
View more comments