Australia’s Wealthiest Tycoon Demands Removal Of Unflattering Double Chin Portrait From Gallery
Gina Rinehart, the richest person in Australia, demanded the take-down of her portrait from the National Gallery of Australia (NGA).
The portrait, which was deemed unflattering by the mining magnate, was created by the acclaimed Archibald Prize-winning Aboriginal artist Vincent Namatjira.
Set to be on display until July 21, the Australian tycoon’s portrait is one of Vincent’s 21 individual portraits that make up a single piece in his exhibition, called “Australia in Colour.”
Gina Rinehart sparked a controversy as she demanded the removal of her portrait from the National Gallery of Australia
Image credits: Quinn Rooney/Getty Images
The piece includes the portraits of the late Queen Elizabeth II, American musician Jimi Hendrix, Australian Aboriginal rights activist Vincent Lingiari, and the former Prime Minister of Australia Scott Morrison hanging alongside the image of Australia’s top billionaire.
The 70-year-old mining heiress approached NGA to have her Vincent-created portrait removed from public display. However, the Canberra gallery refused her request and said it should be left hanging up on the yellow wall of the gallery to foster public debate.
Australia’s wealthiest tycoon said her portrait, made by artist Vincent Namatjira, was unflattering
Image credits: Vincent Namatjira via Tu_4_yu / Twitter
“Since 1973, when the National Gallery acquired Jackson Pollock’s Blue Poles, there has been a dynamic discussion on the artistic merits of works in the national collection, and/or on display at the gallery,” it said.
“We present works of art to the Australian public to inspire people to explore, experience and learn about art,” the statement added.
Gina Rinehart’s portrait hangs alongside those of late Queen Elizabeth II, American musician Jimi Hendrix, and others as part of the artist’s exhibition “Australia in Colour”
View this post on Instagram
The gallery remained resolute in keeping the portrait on display despite receiving complaints not only from Australia’s most wealthy woman but also from individuals connected to her company, Hancock Prospecting, and from athletes her company sponsors.
Vincent addressed the controversy around his paintings that feature world leaders and famed figures in a cartoonish manner.
“I paint the world as I see it,” the artist said, as quoted by news.com.au.
Vincent Namatjira addressed the controversy and said, “People don’t have to like my paintings”
Gina Rinehart portrait in context: one part of a much larger artwork
Vincent Namatjira says he ‘paints the world as he sees it’
Isn’t freedom of art/expression as essential as freedom of speech?
If you don’t like the reflection, don’t look in the mirrorhttps://t.co/LoUssMl6mMpic.twitter.com/sOV3p0oCys— Prof Ray Wills (@ProfRayWills) May 17, 2024
“People don’t have to like my paintings, but I hope they take the time to look and think, ‘Why has this Aboriginal bloke painted these powerful people? What is he trying to say?’ I paint people who are wealthy, powerful, or significant – people who have had an influence on this country, and on me personally, whether directly or indirectly, whether for good or for bad,” he continued.
“Some people might not like it, other people might find it funny, but I hope people look beneath the surface and see the serious side too,” he added.
True. I know I would never have heard of this if she hadn't put up a fuss.
Load More Replies...I find them all sort of awful. But it seems like that was the intention, to do something garish and cartoonish. I mean, the Queen was not buck-toothed, thats a caricature of an inbred English royal
Load More Replies...I think her portrait is hilarious 😂 😃 "I paint the world how I see it." Is such a wicked burn, I'm guessing he doesn't like her much!
If you don't like the reflection don't look into the mirror... Priceless!
Load More Replies...It's a portrait of her, not her portrait. And that, my friend, is the crucial difference.
It should be noted that people in Australia are mercilessly taking the p**s out of Gina for her demand, with parodies (Gina's 'portrait' face Photoshopped onto all sorts of other pictures) appearing everywhere.
Oh, we really are. She is such a garbage human - I think the portrait is perfect.
Load More Replies...He makes everyone look ugly! I'm guessing on purpose. Or he's just a really bad artist. ;)
The artist apparently often uses satire in his works. I read an interview/article that said he often "takes aim at the rich, white and privileged – with status-puncturing irreverence."
Load More Replies...Gina Reinhart is an awful lump of garbage human being, and that painting is an accurate representation of her.
To understand the kind of person she is: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-05/rinehart-says-aussie-workers-overpaid-unproductive/4243866 Here she calls for Australian pay to "be more competitive" with Africans earning $2 a day. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2012-aug-30-la-fi-mo-richest-woman-20120830-story.html Here she says the poor should work harder and have less fun to become millionaires like her, who inherited her wealth. https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/leaders/rinehart-calls-for-tax-cuts-criticises-renewables-and-eyesore-solar-panels-20231215-p5err5 Here's her demanding tax cuts and hating on renewables and solar. Let us just say she seems like the sort who would actually take offense at a caricature.
I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder but... I just don't like them. I found the ghanaian movie posters much better.
It's completely fine to hate an art style, I find these works quite ugly, and I'd be happy to never have to look at them again. But there's a huge difference between ugly/bad art and unskilled art, and it's very clear which people don't know enough about it to recognize that.
I can't believe that guy is considered a talented artist worthy of gallery showings. It's like if someone with schizophrenia painted Annie Wilkes from Misery. It's not art, it's a train wreck.
Why specifically a schizophrenic person? Are people with schizophrenia known to be markedly less talented at painting than people without schizophrenia? I don't think you can paint a whole neurological disorder in a single stroke like that. Those who boldly claim a noted artist lacks talent, however, often do tend to fall more or less into the same category of "Not an Artist."
Load More Replies...I think the artist is either a bad painter or taking the p**s. She doesn't look like that.
I would do the same in her situation. Sorry, but it's too ugly. I don't like his style to be honest.
She didn't comission the portrait, so she really has no say in where it hangs. If she wanted to get rid of it, then she should have quietly bought it instead of demanding the gallery take it down.
Load More Replies...It's a bloody awful portrait, as are all the others. However the Gallery has the right to display them. I wonder if Vincent is related to that wonderful and celebrated Aboriginal artist Albert Namatjira ? HE knew how to paint.
if she want it removed she has money enough to buy it and keep it private
I think you'd be hard pressed to find ONE member of the Australian public who is on Gina's side in this.
I think it an excellent likeness, except the artist omitted the smeared eyeliner. Has Gina not heard of primer?
She could buy the painting and be done with it. But instead, she made herself a household name.
I assure you that she can not. Just because the facial features are distorted and the painting is not aesthetically pleasing doesn't mean it was done without skill.
Load More Replies...She is short, obese, and a terrible person who comes from a long line of terrible people.
Load More Replies...True. I know I would never have heard of this if she hadn't put up a fuss.
Load More Replies...I find them all sort of awful. But it seems like that was the intention, to do something garish and cartoonish. I mean, the Queen was not buck-toothed, thats a caricature of an inbred English royal
Load More Replies...I think her portrait is hilarious 😂 😃 "I paint the world how I see it." Is such a wicked burn, I'm guessing he doesn't like her much!
If you don't like the reflection don't look into the mirror... Priceless!
Load More Replies...It's a portrait of her, not her portrait. And that, my friend, is the crucial difference.
It should be noted that people in Australia are mercilessly taking the p**s out of Gina for her demand, with parodies (Gina's 'portrait' face Photoshopped onto all sorts of other pictures) appearing everywhere.
Oh, we really are. She is such a garbage human - I think the portrait is perfect.
Load More Replies...He makes everyone look ugly! I'm guessing on purpose. Or he's just a really bad artist. ;)
The artist apparently often uses satire in his works. I read an interview/article that said he often "takes aim at the rich, white and privileged – with status-puncturing irreverence."
Load More Replies...Gina Reinhart is an awful lump of garbage human being, and that painting is an accurate representation of her.
To understand the kind of person she is: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-05/rinehart-says-aussie-workers-overpaid-unproductive/4243866 Here she calls for Australian pay to "be more competitive" with Africans earning $2 a day. https://www.latimes.com/business/la-xpm-2012-aug-30-la-fi-mo-richest-woman-20120830-story.html Here she says the poor should work harder and have less fun to become millionaires like her, who inherited her wealth. https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/leaders/rinehart-calls-for-tax-cuts-criticises-renewables-and-eyesore-solar-panels-20231215-p5err5 Here's her demanding tax cuts and hating on renewables and solar. Let us just say she seems like the sort who would actually take offense at a caricature.
I know beauty is in the eye of the beholder but... I just don't like them. I found the ghanaian movie posters much better.
It's completely fine to hate an art style, I find these works quite ugly, and I'd be happy to never have to look at them again. But there's a huge difference between ugly/bad art and unskilled art, and it's very clear which people don't know enough about it to recognize that.
I can't believe that guy is considered a talented artist worthy of gallery showings. It's like if someone with schizophrenia painted Annie Wilkes from Misery. It's not art, it's a train wreck.
Why specifically a schizophrenic person? Are people with schizophrenia known to be markedly less talented at painting than people without schizophrenia? I don't think you can paint a whole neurological disorder in a single stroke like that. Those who boldly claim a noted artist lacks talent, however, often do tend to fall more or less into the same category of "Not an Artist."
Load More Replies...I think the artist is either a bad painter or taking the p**s. She doesn't look like that.
I would do the same in her situation. Sorry, but it's too ugly. I don't like his style to be honest.
She didn't comission the portrait, so she really has no say in where it hangs. If she wanted to get rid of it, then she should have quietly bought it instead of demanding the gallery take it down.
Load More Replies...It's a bloody awful portrait, as are all the others. However the Gallery has the right to display them. I wonder if Vincent is related to that wonderful and celebrated Aboriginal artist Albert Namatjira ? HE knew how to paint.
if she want it removed she has money enough to buy it and keep it private
I think you'd be hard pressed to find ONE member of the Australian public who is on Gina's side in this.
I think it an excellent likeness, except the artist omitted the smeared eyeliner. Has Gina not heard of primer?
She could buy the painting and be done with it. But instead, she made herself a household name.
I assure you that she can not. Just because the facial features are distorted and the painting is not aesthetically pleasing doesn't mean it was done without skill.
Load More Replies...She is short, obese, and a terrible person who comes from a long line of terrible people.
Load More Replies...



65
95