When AI Meets Magic: I Gave Harry Potter Characters A Shrek-Tastic Makeover (14 Pics)
Have you ever wondered what the Harry Potter series would look like if it was an animation? If so, you've come to the right place! I asked AI image generator Midjourney to reimagine a selection of the most popular characters in Harry Potter in the animation style of DreamWorks, specifically as characters from Shrek.
A cartoon version of the Harry Potter movies would be absolutely incredible, and this mash-up of styles works perfectly. Scroll down to see the results of a Harry Potter and DreamWorks Shrek animation style mash-up!
More info: tiktok.com
This post may include affiliate links.
Hermione Granger
Severus Snape
Looks a bit too old and too sturdy. Snape is 37 in the last book and described as quite thin.
Harry Potter
he did see lots of deaths though…
Load More Replies...Just what? Why are his eyes like that? Where is his scar---is it that weird shadow on his forhead? Why is his hair so BIG?!?!
Ron Weasley
I love looking at pictures and wondering what the hell is going on with the subject's mouth
Draco Malfoy
He looks too innocent but it's alright...EXCEPT WHY DOES HE HAVE HARRY'S EYES?!
Lacks the seething emotions and arrogant presence of the real Malfoy. No bueno.
Rubeus Hagrid
Hair/beard too well maintained/clean. Lacks the presence of the creatures for which he lives. Def not the real Hagrid.
Albus Dumbledore
And violence wise my hands are not the cleanest
Load More Replies...This looks like Gandalf and Thoron Oakenshield had a baby.
Alfred, it's not that I don't agree with you, but you don't have to do this on ALL of them.
Load More Replies...Two of Dumbledore's most defining features are his long thin nose, and his half moon spectacles!!!! Wtf are they??
Luna Lovegood
apparently Luna was a succubus/demon or something the whole time. huh.
This wouldn't be the worst if this was some random character from another show or movie, cuz it's cute yeah, but that is NOT Luna.
Fred And George Weasley
They were identical. Even their mother wasn't always sure.
They look too different! I always imagined them as both looking like the one on the right (Who I assume is George).
No no no no no. Nope. They were so identical that their mother couldn't tell them apart.
Looks like 2 of Prince Hans 13 brothers from Frozen than the Weasley twins.
All for some random person to get an ugly image spat out in a mere matter of seconds, whereas true artists spend hours, to days and maybe even months creating real art.
Load More Replies...Bellatrix Lestrange
Little Harry Potter
No. Hair should be BLACK. He was UNDER FED. NEVER round or chubby faced.
Minerva Mcgonagall
Ummm...I mean she was an Animagus but...not like THIS....(and why are her ears so big???? help me)
Okay, I'm not familiar with the books... but is she supposed to be a yoda-cat-woman?
Moaning Myrtle
is she she-hulks long long long long long long long long lost sister or something?
Voldemort (Who Got His Nose Back!)
There is no "I" in "AI". It's just elaborate copy/paste algorithms. It's isn't capable of originality, and its "knowledge" was stolen by vacuuming up copyrighted items - frequently over the direct objections of the sites hosting those items. Do better.
repeat after me: typing prompts into a bar does not make you an artist. If you wanna use it for fun, fine, but don't repost these images claiming it as your art, and claiming you're an artist. Honestly, BP, you should know better. (Also i'm calling out the fact that ages ago when AI first started getting posted I said no to AI art and got a ton of people downvoting me to the point I almost got permabanned. But Anyhow I'm glad people realise how bad it is now xD)
I agree, but I would post it crediting the AI rather than myself
Load More Replies...AI ≠ Art. If we could go without seeing ugly, stolen, sterile, soulless images on this site for a nice long while (AKA: forever), I think most people on BP would greatly appreciate that. Why do the real talented artists have to struggle to get any recognition on this site, whereas these hacks get pushed to the top?
The person that posted this is not an artist, but these aren't too bad. Most of the ones I get when I type a prompt in an ai generator are horrific. 🤪
There is no "I" in "AI". It's just elaborate copy/paste algorithms. It's isn't capable of originality, and its "knowledge" was stolen by vacuuming up copyrighted items - frequently over the direct objections of the sites hosting those items. Do better.
repeat after me: typing prompts into a bar does not make you an artist. If you wanna use it for fun, fine, but don't repost these images claiming it as your art, and claiming you're an artist. Honestly, BP, you should know better. (Also i'm calling out the fact that ages ago when AI first started getting posted I said no to AI art and got a ton of people downvoting me to the point I almost got permabanned. But Anyhow I'm glad people realise how bad it is now xD)
I agree, but I would post it crediting the AI rather than myself
Load More Replies...AI ≠ Art. If we could go without seeing ugly, stolen, sterile, soulless images on this site for a nice long while (AKA: forever), I think most people on BP would greatly appreciate that. Why do the real talented artists have to struggle to get any recognition on this site, whereas these hacks get pushed to the top?
The person that posted this is not an artist, but these aren't too bad. Most of the ones I get when I type a prompt in an ai generator are horrific. 🤪
