“Why Is This Being Allowed?” Meghan Markle’s Behavior On Australian Tour Sparks Backlash
As Meghan Markle and Prince Harry arrived in Australia on Tuesday, April 14, for a four-day visit, the internet quickly began picking apart the Duchess of Sussex’s “gross” body language.
The couple’s visit marks their return to the country since their widely followed 2018 royal tour, but what was expected to be a nostalgic and celebratory comeback has instead sparked a heated online backlash.
- Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s return to Australia has sparked intense backlash, with critics calling the visit a “quasi-royal tour.”
- From comparisons to Princess Diana and Catherine, Princess of Wales, Meghan’s on-camera behavior has become the center of a heated online debate.
- A royal expert also weighed in on the couple’s appearances, fueling speculation that the tour may be tied to commercial interests.
As videos from their first day circulated widely across social media, viewers began drawing comparisons, with many accusing Meghan of “cosplaying” other royal members.
“Stunts like this is EXACTLY why the titles need to be cut. They are gaslighting the public… and now they’re subjecting the poor Aussies to the same grifter a*use,” fumed one netizen.
Meghan Markle was brutally slammed, as critics accused her of copying Princess Diana and Catherine, Princess of Wales
Image credits: Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images
Unlike their previous visit, Meghan and Prince Harry traveled to Australia as private citizens on a privately funded trip, combining charitable engagements with commercial events.
Reportedly, their latest tour focuses on mental health, community resilience, and support for veterans.
On day one, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex attended several events in the bustling city of Melbourne, including visits to the Royal Children’s Hospital, the Australian National Veterans’ Art Museum, and McAuley Community Services for Women, where Meghan made a solo appearance.
Image credits: newscomauHQ
Image credits: MWJ_UK
While netizens have largely expressed dissatisfaction with the tour, the first day sparked significant controversy, particularly surrounding the couple’s visit to the Royal Children’s Hospital.
The 90-minute visit involved personal interactions with young patients and carried echoes of royal legacy, as it served as an homage to Harry’s late mother, Princess Diana.
In October 1985, Diana visited the hospital, founded by her then mother-in-law, Queen Elizabeth II, alongside her then-husband, Charles III.
Image credits: newscomauHQ
According to media reports, despite their status as private citizens, the couple received a massive reception, with hundreds of families and staff lining the hospital balconies to catch a glimpse of them.
Harry and Meghan spent roughly 15 to 40 minutes in the foyer, shaking hands, taking selfies, and accepting flowers and handmade drawings from patients.
The couple’s Australian tour marks their return to the country after more than seven years, this time as private citizens
Image credits: theheraldsun
Image credits: nancytsidley
They also held private meetings with young oncology patients, including 12-year-old Novalie Morris, who told People, “I gave Harry flowers and he said ‘thank you’ and he told me to ‘keep on being brave.’ It cheered me up a lot and I’ll keep thinking about that.”
Moreover, when some attendees addressed Meghan by her royal title, she reportedly responded warmly, saying, “Call me Meg.”
However, several videos from the couple’s hospital visit upset viewers, with many criticizing the Suits alum’s body language in the clips.
Did Meghan really hand a gift to her handler like she’s a Royal?!?! #StripTheTitlespic.twitter.com/nFGE8SJlkG
— Nancy Sidley (@nancytsidley) April 14, 2026
Image credits: stellahenworth
Some harshly accused her of “copying” the demeanor of her sister-in-law, Catherine, Princess of Wales, as well as Princess Diana.
One displeased netizen wrote, “She’s desperately trying to act like Catherine!”
Another agreed, saying, “Reminds me of the Diana years.. phenomenon,” while a third commented, “Literally copying Prince William and Princess Catherine. So pathetic. I can’t believe they dragged these poor sick people out to create an illusion of excitement and a welcoming crowd.”
Image credits: Jayne Fincher/Princess Diana Archive/Getty Images
Others expressed, “She is even more pathetic… with her narcissism. Who does she think she is? When will the RF remove their titles??? This trampling around the globe acting like a fake fool has to stop.”
Some critics also took issue with the optics of the visit, claiming that young patients were “paraded” out of their rooms to welcome the couple, while noting that, during her visits, Princess Diana was known for going room-to-room to meet patients individually.
One critic expressed online, “Absolutely disgusting that the hospital wheeled out obviously sick children for this ‘ego trip!!’”
Image credits: scottishdailyrecord
One netizen fumed, “Poor sick children being subjected to this. They are not royalty and should not be treated as such. All these people are doing is feeding their ego.”
Another commenter said, “This makes me angry. They’re treating this as a quasi-royal tour, not a private visit. They really think they are still royals with all the trappings that go with it.”
“What the actual f**k is this? They are doing a pseudo-royal tour here,” remarked a third.
Image credits: Royal-jjj
Another comment read, “I am disgusted with the hospital using sick children this way for a photo op.”
“Those poor kids and their families used as pr for the grifters. I wouldn’t let my child anywhere near them,” one person commented, while others noted, “They don’t donate and they don’t need to bring awareness to anything… I’m annoyed they were allowed to exploit children like this while their own children are hidden away…”
“She is basking in the attention! It doesn’t matter to her if this is an “official” royal tour or not, all that matters is she’s getting attention from people and she feels important. Look at me! Look at me!”
Image credits: newscomauHQ
Contrary to the online accusations, Harry and Meghan support various causes and regularly donate through their foundation Archewell Philanthropies, which was rebranded from the Archewell Foundation last year.
In some clips, Meghan was seen bending down to speak to young children at eye level, a gesture Princess Catherine consistently uses during public engagements, particularly with children.
One royal expert labeled Meghan and Prince Harry’s four-day visit as a “desperate attempt to monetise their status”
Image credits: newscomauHQ
While the internet has labeled the visit a “quasi-royal tour,” experts have also suggested that the couple may be leveraging royal-style appearances to advance commercial interests.
According to Giselle Bastin, an associate professor at Flinders University and an expert on the British royal family, “It’s well known that the Sussexes are in dire need of income and so a staging of a quasi-royal tour to Australia is being regarded as a rather desperate attempt to monetise their status as royalty.”
Image credits: scottishdailyrecord
She told the Australian Associated Press (AAP), “During the 2018 tour, Meghan was overheard to say that she couldn’t believe she ‘wasn’t being paid for this’, and the irony is that this time she is coming to Australia and being paid.”
While Bastin alluded to the couple being paid for the visit, this remains a matter of debate, as there is no direct evidence confirming the claim.
However, reports suggest that during the visit, Meghan is headlining the “Her Best Life” luxury women’s retreat at the InterContinental Sydney Coogee Beach, with tickets priced between $2,699 and $3,199 for the weekend.
Prince Harry is also a featured speaker at the InterEdge Psychosocial Safety Summit, where tickets range from $997 to $2,378.
Moreover, the tour coincides with Meghan’s recent trademarking of her lifestyle brand, As Ever, in Australia for products such as jams and homeware.
“It’s insulting, honestly. Crowds to meet 2 private citizens who brought nothing with them besides a camera crew,” wrote one critic
Image credits: OrochiMarkle
Image credits: MsPrint_2
Image credits: ArtsandCulture
Image credits: MenagaMani1650
Image credits: beemabart
Image credits: LisaTrampolina6
Image credits: sillymesue30
Image credits: ninasdolcevida
Image credits: MissSass1978
Image credits: ms_oz23
Image credits: VampireGurrrl
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
So this is the couple who belittled and left the royal family because they wanted to live a private life, acting as fake royals and making money from being sided as royals.
You mean the royals like the pervert Prince Andrew and his equally nauseating wife, Sarah Ferguson? You can say what you want about Harry and Meghan, but they sure do not have the weight of being connected to the likes of Epstein. Furthermore, you should educate yourself, as Harry and Meghan are still heavily involved in global causes as private citizens. They launched The Parents’ Network to protect children from online exploitation and sextortion, and Harry has spent twenty years supporting children with HIV/AIDS through Sentebale. He’s also still a dedicated patron for WellChild and Scotty’s Little Soldiers, while their foundation provides medical aid and prosthetics for children in war zones like Ukraine and Gaza. They didn't stop the work; they just stopped doing it for a family that protected Andrew while throwing them to the wolves.
Load More Replies...If they genuinely wanted to leave the royal bubble they would have renounced all titles, theirs and their kids. But they realise how much money can be made from the royal connection.
They actually do have lives of their own. They're basically the new Britney as far as the media likes to spin it. They will never do right by the press because Harry sued them.
Load More Replies...If this was anyone else, say a different celebrity, there would be no hate. But nope, haters will keep hating.
From the article: "Meghan and Prince Harry traveled to Australia as private citizens on a privately funded trip, combining charitable engagements with commercial events. Reportedly, their latest tour focuses on mental health, community resilience, and support for veterans." From the internet: "Selfish bástards!" 🙄
This poor couple. No matter how much outreach they do, or how many times they attempt to be human, the Internet hates them. I cannot understand this. I wish them and their children good health, humor and a great life.
It's the hypocrisy. They didn't want to be working royals but expect the same privileges as one. Harry has demanded the same taxpayer funded security as working royals. They're happy to use the titles of Duke and Duchess, but don't want the responsibility that comes with it. They've critised the royal family and monarchies, but the only reason they've been able to make lots of money from Netflix deals, books and podcasts in because of who his family are. If they were really concerned about outreach, they'd have been better off staying as working royals as they'd have had a much bigger platform to raise awareness of important issues. Also, let's not forget that they have been caught out in lies already. Footage from their documentary showing paparazzi turned out to be from different events that were nothing to do with them. They claimed they got married in secret before the big wedding in the back garden with the Archbishop of Canterbury, but this wouldn't be a legal ceremony in the UK. There's nothing "poor" about them. They live in a mansion in California and live off the proceeds of telling their story to the highest bidders.
Load More Replies...How dare Harry & Meghan exist and do things! It’s an insult to people who get insulted!
I don’t particularly like or dislike them, but I can’t understand why she gets so much hate. It seems like she’s d****d if she does and d****d if she doesn’t
She "stole" Prince Harry, is not lily white, had a mind of her own, called out blatant racism in the monarchy - and that was even before they got married.
Load More Replies...so drawing attention to children in need is a bad thing now if not officially approved by internet?
I've no issue with them personally but I don't feel comfortable about the children being taken from their comfort zone and put in intimidating (germ laden) crowds. Things like can be overwhelming when you're not sick. I would hope that medical staff would have the ok of parents (who don't always make the best choices if we're completely honest) and would only choose children well enough to cope - but it feels all kinds of wrong. They should go to the children, not bring the children to them. It also doesn't draw attention to 'children in need' in any useful or purposeful way.
Load More Replies...So they took time out of a personally paid vacation to bring joy to the likes of sick children and veterans….and we are pissed off about this? They are celebrities regardless of affiliation. And as royals…they had been stripped of their security detail so they chose to step down and live their lives outside of the monarchy. Why are people still angry with them for doing stuff that made the day special for those that have difficult lives? Answer…because it’s a black woman. How dare she exist.
"Tone-deaf" is the favourite buzzword of people with no actual point to make except that people must blindly conform to their personal idea of acceptability.
Load More Replies...All I know is that William and Catherine don't get this amount of hate. They are the golden couple and everyone else, including his own brother, gets nothing but b.s. from the British press and, apparently, the British public. No wonder he left. Oh wait! That was Meghan's fault too.
Only the British public that reads the Daily Mail. Some people are fans, most genuinely don't spend any time at all thinking about any of them. They have very little impact on most people's days.
Load More Replies...So this is the couple who belittled and left the royal family because they wanted to live a private life, acting as fake royals and making money from being sided as royals.
You mean the royals like the pervert Prince Andrew and his equally nauseating wife, Sarah Ferguson? You can say what you want about Harry and Meghan, but they sure do not have the weight of being connected to the likes of Epstein. Furthermore, you should educate yourself, as Harry and Meghan are still heavily involved in global causes as private citizens. They launched The Parents’ Network to protect children from online exploitation and sextortion, and Harry has spent twenty years supporting children with HIV/AIDS through Sentebale. He’s also still a dedicated patron for WellChild and Scotty’s Little Soldiers, while their foundation provides medical aid and prosthetics for children in war zones like Ukraine and Gaza. They didn't stop the work; they just stopped doing it for a family that protected Andrew while throwing them to the wolves.
Load More Replies...If they genuinely wanted to leave the royal bubble they would have renounced all titles, theirs and their kids. But they realise how much money can be made from the royal connection.
They actually do have lives of their own. They're basically the new Britney as far as the media likes to spin it. They will never do right by the press because Harry sued them.
Load More Replies...If this was anyone else, say a different celebrity, there would be no hate. But nope, haters will keep hating.
From the article: "Meghan and Prince Harry traveled to Australia as private citizens on a privately funded trip, combining charitable engagements with commercial events. Reportedly, their latest tour focuses on mental health, community resilience, and support for veterans." From the internet: "Selfish bástards!" 🙄
This poor couple. No matter how much outreach they do, or how many times they attempt to be human, the Internet hates them. I cannot understand this. I wish them and their children good health, humor and a great life.
It's the hypocrisy. They didn't want to be working royals but expect the same privileges as one. Harry has demanded the same taxpayer funded security as working royals. They're happy to use the titles of Duke and Duchess, but don't want the responsibility that comes with it. They've critised the royal family and monarchies, but the only reason they've been able to make lots of money from Netflix deals, books and podcasts in because of who his family are. If they were really concerned about outreach, they'd have been better off staying as working royals as they'd have had a much bigger platform to raise awareness of important issues. Also, let's not forget that they have been caught out in lies already. Footage from their documentary showing paparazzi turned out to be from different events that were nothing to do with them. They claimed they got married in secret before the big wedding in the back garden with the Archbishop of Canterbury, but this wouldn't be a legal ceremony in the UK. There's nothing "poor" about them. They live in a mansion in California and live off the proceeds of telling their story to the highest bidders.
Load More Replies...How dare Harry & Meghan exist and do things! It’s an insult to people who get insulted!
I don’t particularly like or dislike them, but I can’t understand why she gets so much hate. It seems like she’s d****d if she does and d****d if she doesn’t
She "stole" Prince Harry, is not lily white, had a mind of her own, called out blatant racism in the monarchy - and that was even before they got married.
Load More Replies...so drawing attention to children in need is a bad thing now if not officially approved by internet?
I've no issue with them personally but I don't feel comfortable about the children being taken from their comfort zone and put in intimidating (germ laden) crowds. Things like can be overwhelming when you're not sick. I would hope that medical staff would have the ok of parents (who don't always make the best choices if we're completely honest) and would only choose children well enough to cope - but it feels all kinds of wrong. They should go to the children, not bring the children to them. It also doesn't draw attention to 'children in need' in any useful or purposeful way.
Load More Replies...So they took time out of a personally paid vacation to bring joy to the likes of sick children and veterans….and we are pissed off about this? They are celebrities regardless of affiliation. And as royals…they had been stripped of their security detail so they chose to step down and live their lives outside of the monarchy. Why are people still angry with them for doing stuff that made the day special for those that have difficult lives? Answer…because it’s a black woman. How dare she exist.
"Tone-deaf" is the favourite buzzword of people with no actual point to make except that people must blindly conform to their personal idea of acceptability.
Load More Replies...All I know is that William and Catherine don't get this amount of hate. They are the golden couple and everyone else, including his own brother, gets nothing but b.s. from the British press and, apparently, the British public. No wonder he left. Oh wait! That was Meghan's fault too.
Only the British public that reads the Daily Mail. Some people are fans, most genuinely don't spend any time at all thinking about any of them. They have very little impact on most people's days.
Load More Replies...



























-44
58