Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
28
Massive Outrage After McDonald’s Calls Cops On 13YO School Girl Over New Policy
A teenage girl’s arrest outside a UK McDonald’s has launched a fierce online debate over youth policies and police conduct, after a short clip of the incident went viral with more than 3 million views overnight.
The viral post, shared Sunday (August 10), claimed the 13-year-old was detained “due to a policy stating school kids are not allowed in after 5pm” and that “McDonald’s called the police after an argument escalated.”
Highlights
- A 13-year-old girl's arrest at a UK McDonald's ignited a viral debate after going viral over 3 million views overnight.
- The post claimed the teenager was detained for violating a rule that forbids people under 18 from going to McDonald's after 5pm.
- Netizens noticed several inconsistencies with the claim.
In the video, three officers can be seen confronting the girl as she stands next to what appears to be a classmate, with a McDonald’s worker nearby. The 13-year-old is then forcefully removed from the scene, kicking and screaming in dramatic fashion.
“That’s insane. Meanwhile criminals go free,” one user wrote.
Local viewers, however, noticed something was off.
From the origin of the “5 pm rule,” to the fact that her classmate wasn’t removed from the scene, many suspected the incident had less to do with McDonald’s, and more to do with the teenager’s behavior.
RELATED:
Footage of a 13-year-old being forcefully removed from a McDonald’s went viral, with netizens criticizing the officers
Image credits: NoCapMediaa
“Really we’re arresting young girls and we can’t even arrest real criminals!?” a viewer wrote, echoing the sentiments of thousands as the clip made its way to all social media channels.
“They are being so ab*sive towards the teenager,” another added. “There are far more important crimes the police should be worried about.”
Image credits: NoCapMediaa
Similar comments argued the police would’ve looked away if she was being harassed, pointing to the existence of a “two-tier system” in the country when dealing with different individuals.
“I wish they were this effective when it comes to capturing actual delinquents,” a user wrote.
Image credits: NoCapMediaa
Beyond the officers’ behavior, many viewers, especially those from outside the UK, were taken aback by the alleged reason for the teenager’s removal: the 5 pm rule.
Some called it “ridiculous” and “embarrassing,” questioning why a global fast-food chain would take such a hardline stance over something as harmless as a teenager sitting in a restaurant.
Turns out McDonalds‘ had a very good reason for putting the measure in place.
The ban was put in place in 2022 due to a rise in anti-social behavior towards employees and customers
Image credits: NoCapMediaa
The policy was first put in place in August 2022, when a McDonald’s in Liverpool introduced a ban on students under 18 eating inside after 5 pm unless accompanied by an adult.
A spokesperson for McDonald’s UK explained at the time that the measure was implemented after staff at the 24-hour location had been subjected to “verbal and physical abuse” from groups of minors.
A schoolgirl was arrested at Mcdonalds due to a policy stating school kids are not allowed in after 5pm. McDonalds called the police after an argument escalated. 😧 pic.twitter.com/PhxvZJkKPo
— Wild content (@NoCapMediaa) August 11, 2025
“Over recent weeks, we have seen an increase in the number of incidents of anti-social behavior in the area with our people being subjected to verbal and physical abuse,” the spokesperson said.
“We have a zero-tolerance policy when it comes to crime and anti-social behavior.”
The decision, they added, “was not taken lightly” and was made in coordination with local police.
More importantly, the spokesperson went on to share a key detail that would prove essential in uncovering the truth behind the 13-year-old’s arrest:
The rule was explicitly described as temporary and applied only to that specific McDonald’s restaurant in Liverpool.
Image credits: Daniel Way/Unsplash (Not the actual photo)
This, coupled with the fact that the 13-year-old’s classmate was not detained by police, and the fact that she was clearly seen carrying items from the restaurant, led many viewers to suspect that the teenager’s removal had nothing to do with the supposed rule at all.
The teenager was arrested in June, and a fact-check revealed her removal had nothing to do with the alleged rule
Image credits: U. J. Alexander/Adobe Stock (Not the actual photo)
Their suspicions turned out to be true as a fact-check by UK netizens revealed the viral clip was not from this month at all, but from June 9, 2025.
Local reports describe officers on foot patrol entering the Liscard Way McDonald’s in Wirral after seeing a group of youths run out. Inside, they identified the 13-year-old, who had previously been barred from the restaurant and had allegedly been “seen swearing at staff.”
Her attitude only worsened once she was asked to leave, throwing insults and expletives toward employees. At one point, during an attempt to escort her out, one officer was reportedly scratched on the face and kicked in the groin.
Police aid was immediately requested, and the events depicted in the viral clip ensued.
Following her arrest, the teenager was released to her parents and was ordered to attend a police interview at an undisclosed date.
Image credits: Joiarib Morales Uc/Unsplash (Not the actual photo)
The viral post, shared by an X account that claims to post “what the news won’t show,” was in reality classic outrage bait.
Its framing was carefully designed to provoke anger, portraying the student as an innocent victim and the police as needlessly aggressive.
Key context was omitted, and a misleading claim was inserted that her arrest stemmed from the so-called “5 pm rule.” Regardless, the damage was already done.
“This makes no sense.” It didn’t take long for netizens to notice inconsistencies in the alleged story
Image credits: thec0med1an
Image credits: AnnDrogyne
Image credits: LeeHurstComic
Image credits: world_mission66
Image credits: BigBrenLFC
Image credits: brisology
Image credits: Dj_Jish_Josh
Image credits: _KevinArmstrong
Image credits: Buhanochka_Z
Image credits: BrunellaCapitan
Image credits: Catoiswatching
Image credits: I_Menelaus
Image credits: Huey1N
Image credits: darklake99
Image credits: marktournier2
Image credits: amkathu18
Image credits: foerster_bryan
Image credits: This_Old_Lady
Image credits: 12_menke
Image credits: TraderJoex
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
UKDeek 3 months ago (edited)
My step-son works as a Shift Manager in a McDonalds here in the UK, and he tells me all the time of disorderly behaviour from customers, and several occasions the Police have been called as damage has been causes, or staff asssaulted. This video, like a lot of videos on the internet, does not paint the full picture. In most places in the UK, trespass is a civilian matter, so the Police cannot arrest someone for trespass - meaning this girl could not have been arrested in this McDonalds for being there when the staff didn't want her there. However, if she became violent and / or abbusive, then she absoutely can be arrested for either Public Order offence or Breach of the Peace.
Krd 3 months ago
So blanket bans are the answer? Why not banning individuals that break the rules? Why should an entire class of people be punished because of a minority amount of them is behaving poorly? What's next, banning all black people because one black person did something bad? Plus unless she hurt or damaged something, than arresting a teen is just so uncouth. But this specific incident aside, blanket bans are effectively legal discrimination. Very sad so many people are ok with these kinds of tactics. Wouldn't be so supportive if it was you or your family being banned/arrested for trying to patronize a local business.
Load More Replies...
Janelle Collard 3 months ago (edited)
Exhibit A in *why* McDonald's has the "no unaccompanied minors after 5 PM" rule.
Anthony Elmore 3 months ago
Honestly, it'd be enough grounds to have her trespassed by itself, but it sounds like They were looking the other way on it until she started acting out.
Load More Replies...
Sian E 3 months ago
Nasty little madam F'd Around and Found Out. And unfortunately will probably be back there already, causing a nuisance. Even if they ban her from the premises she is going to hang around outside with her little friends in an attempt to rile the staff. Because for some reason, teenagers like that find being obnoxious is hilarious.
Kevin Hickey 3 months ago
They always have, since the dawn of civilization. Why did they sell her food?
Load More Replies... UKDeek 3 months ago (edited)
My step-son works as a Shift Manager in a McDonalds here in the UK, and he tells me all the time of disorderly behaviour from customers, and several occasions the Police have been called as damage has been causes, or staff asssaulted. This video, like a lot of videos on the internet, does not paint the full picture. In most places in the UK, trespass is a civilian matter, so the Police cannot arrest someone for trespass - meaning this girl could not have been arrested in this McDonalds for being there when the staff didn't want her there. However, if she became violent and / or abbusive, then she absoutely can be arrested for either Public Order offence or Breach of the Peace.
Krd 3 months ago
So blanket bans are the answer? Why not banning individuals that break the rules? Why should an entire class of people be punished because of a minority amount of them is behaving poorly? What's next, banning all black people because one black person did something bad? Plus unless she hurt or damaged something, than arresting a teen is just so uncouth. But this specific incident aside, blanket bans are effectively legal discrimination. Very sad so many people are ok with these kinds of tactics. Wouldn't be so supportive if it was you or your family being banned/arrested for trying to patronize a local business.
Load More Replies... Janelle Collard 3 months ago (edited)
Exhibit A in *why* McDonald's has the "no unaccompanied minors after 5 PM" rule.
Anthony Elmore 3 months ago
Honestly, it'd be enough grounds to have her trespassed by itself, but it sounds like They were looking the other way on it until she started acting out.
Load More Replies... Sian E 3 months ago
Nasty little madam F'd Around and Found Out. And unfortunately will probably be back there already, causing a nuisance. Even if they ban her from the premises she is going to hang around outside with her little friends in an attempt to rile the staff. Because for some reason, teenagers like that find being obnoxious is hilarious.
Kevin Hickey 3 months ago
They always have, since the dawn of civilization. Why did they sell her food?
Load More Replies... You May Like “Disgusting”: Fans Brutally Slam Joey Swoll For Controversial Take On Trans Gym Locker Room Fight "I'm Born Female": Bearded Trans Man Forced To Explain Himself After Woman Confronts Him Pastors Call Woman A “Witch” For Exposing Churches’ Double Standards With “Brilliant” Experiment
Gabija Saveiskyte
Karina Babenok
Karina Babenok
Related on Bored Panda
27
53