Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
3
J.K. Rowling Brutally Mocks Harry Potter Event Organizers Over Apology To Transgender Community
Ahead of a Harry Potter-themed event set to take place in Stanley Park, Vancouver, the organizers have publicly distanced themselves from the franchise’s controversial author.
J.K. Rowling shared the news on her social media, not only expressing her feelings but also issuing a scathing response to the organization.
The British author has long been criticized for her controversial opinions on transgender rights, sparking debate and backlash over the years.
Highlights
- The Vancouver Park Board formally disavowed J.K. Rowling following backlash to a Harry Potter–themed event scheduled at Stanley Park.
- In response, the British author mocked the decision on X, saying the disavowal “hasn’t been much of a blow.”
- The board’s commissioner also issued an apology to the LGBTQ+ and transgender community.
- “I honestly don’t know how anyone could recover from this disavowal. I mean, Parks and Recs?” joked one user.
“You can’t smoke this woman. Don’t even try. She will cut you down with a literary katana and pour salty retorts into your wounds. You have all been warned,” joked one user.
RELATED:
J.K. Rowling was publicly disavowed by the Vancouver Park Board in a series of posts on social media
Image credits: CityNews
On October 10, Rowling shared a screenshot of statements made by Vancouver Park Board commissioner Tom Digby on her X account.
According to Digby, the park board voted unanimously on Tuesday to issue an apology regarding the event Harry Potter: A Forbidden Forest Experience, scheduled to open on November 7.
The apology was directed toward members of Vancouver’s 2SLGBTQ+ Advisory Committee, who were disappointed by the board’s decision to host an event associated with Rowling.
Image credits: Harry Potter: A Forbidden Forest Experience
Image credits: AlastairMcA30
As the 60-year-old author has been vocal about her anti-trans stance on gender politics for years, the committee did not want the park to host an event linked to her franchise.
Tom’s statement, shared yesterday, read, “Last night, @ParkBoard did the right thing. Apologized to TGD2S community after emotional discussion. Shared some tears. Disavowed JKR. Will undertake concrete actions to rebuild trust.”
The Harry Potter: A Forbidden Forest Experience event is set to open in Vancouver’s Stanley Park this November
Image credits: jk_rowling/X
In response to Digby and the park board’s disavowal of her, Rowling fired back sarcastically, claiming she had no idea the park had ever “avowed” her.
In light of this, she added that the disavowal “hasn’t been much of a blow.”
Rowling went on to urge the board to first send her a “certificate of avowal” before publicly severing ties in the future.
“Wait until I’ve proudly framed it, hung it over my PC and taken a selfie with it, THEN revoke it.”
Image credits: jk_rowling
The screenshot Rowling shared also included a September 15 post from Digby, in which he first announced an “emergency meeting” that night to discuss the matter of “hosting the Harry Potter themed event.”
He encouraged followers to submit questions via email, noting, “Board meeting does not permit public speakers but you can email and watch live…”
The 60-year-old author has sparked numerous controversies with her outspoken stance on gender and anti-trans views
Image credits: Vancouver Park Board Meeting
Tickets for the upcoming immersive event are priced at $84 for adults and $68 for children aged three to 12.
A family bundle, which includes two adults and two children, is priced at $376.
Rowling’s X post received over 800,000 views within hours and sparked mixed reactions from netizens.
The majority supported the author and her statements, while some applauded the park board members for apologizing to the LGBTQ+ community.
Image credits: Harry Potter: A Forbidden Forest Experience
One critic wrote, “Mark my words. J.K. Rowling will NEVER recover from this.”
However, Rowling did not let the comment go unanswered, responding with yet another sarcastic reply in the comment section.
“I wouldn’t say ‘never’, but with time, therapy and the support of my family, I anticipate that I’ll be able to hear the words ‘Vancouver Parks and Recreations’ without suffering a serious breakdown within two to three years.”
The LGBTQ+ and trans community felt “personally very attacked” by the planning of the Rowling-associated event
Image credits: vangreens
The event, first announced in early September, was immediately met with massive backlash and criticism from the public.
Addressing the controversy, Digby told Global Newsat the time, “I have learned a great deal in the last five days about the linkage of the Harry Potter franchise with J.K. Rowling and I am very surprised at what I’ve learned and I was not aware of the reputational risk…”
“The gender diverse and particularly trans community feels personally very attacked by actions that J.K. Rowling has taken.”
Image credits: jk_rowling/X
Image credits: Acts17David
Image credits: jk_rowling
He further emphasized his pride in Vancouver’s “diverse gender communities” and his desire to find a solution to include them in the event.
The Vancouver Board of Parks is not the only organization to have cut ties with Rowling, who has faced public feuds with a large portion of the acting industry, including Emma Watson, who played Hermione Granger.
Rowling recently lashed out at Emma Watson over criticisms of her anti-trans views on social media
Image credits: Harry Potter: A Forbidden Forest Experience
Emma, who has long spoken out against the author’s controversial stance, was recently slammed by Rowling.
In an X post shared in late September, the Harry Potter creator stated firmly that a “former professional association” does not give Watson the right to “critique me and my views in public.”
“Emma has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is.”
Image credits: Harry Potter: A Forbidden Forest Experience
The controversy even reached mainstream comedy when, during the premiere of the 51st season of Saturday Night Live, the sketch comedy show mocked the creator of Harry Potter.
Comedian Bowen Yang dressed as the franchise’s character Dobby and held up a T-shirt with Rowling’s name pronounced as “They. K. Rowling,” featuring an image of her with a pixie cut.
Image credits: Juno News
“House elves aren’t the victims. Master Rowling is. She gets so much hate mail,” said Yang, mocking the author.
Rowling’s response to being disavowed sparked mixed reactions from netizens, with some supporting her stance and others criticizing it
Image credits: coccinellanovem
Image credits: lore_zenteno
Image credits: ArtemisiaZan
Image credits: allysharratt2
Image credits: sunnrahkarbel
Image credits: JohnThomsonSK
Image credits: BarbaraDoduk
Image credits: ChristinaBehme4
Image credits: IrisThinksMeh
Image credits: therunninggrave
Image credits: DreaLeePower
Image credits: JohnnyOfSparta
Image credits: champagnepaaaji
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
JB 1 month ago
No, I don’t think so. Try reading the prose “First they came” written by Martin Niemölle. We must speak out against bigotry whenever, wherever, we see it because if we stop, thinking that silence will drown her out, all that’s left is the voices of hate.
Load More Replies... JB 1 month ago
I didn’t expect to laugh out loud reading this however Just No Rowling succeeded in making me splutter with her declaration that ‘a “former professional relationship” does not give Watson the right to critique me and my views in public.’ Sunshine, when you post your views publicly and use your platform to promote hate we *all* have the right to critique you.
UKGrandad 1 month ago (edited)
Rowling didn't say that Watson does not have the right to critique her. That is both a misquote and out of context. Her exact words, in her response to Watson's recent statement about always feeling grateful to Rowling despite her views, were "I’m not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days ...However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right – nay, obligation – to critique me and my views in public.. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public – but I have the same right, and I’ve finally decided to exercise it."
Load More Replies...
FreeTheUnicorn 1 month ago
She cares so little about it that she... Complains publicly and gives them free publicity?
UKGrandad 1 month ago
She isn't complaining, she's mocking, and rightly so.
Load More Replies... Boris Long-Johnson 1 month ago
I’m pretty sure she still retains the rights for a lot of Harry Potter stuff. Every time you buy Harry Potter, she gets a cut.
QuickSilver20061 1 month ago
I wanted to add my two cents on this article because I am a resident of BC and I am Absolutely Disgusted at the behaviour of the Vancouver's Parks & Recreation board. They shouldn't have pandered to the mentally ill because they have pretty much become the laughing stock of Canada and I honestly think the whole board should Resign in Disgrace
UKGrandad 1 month ago
From the article: "The event, first announced in early September, was immediately met with massive backlash and criticism from the public." Did it? Or did a very small number of people from one particular 'community' make a great deal of noise? Still, I suppose that accurate reporting doesn't make for such a dramatic story, which is also why Rowling is always described as being 'anti-trans' and 'anti LGBT' rather than the more honest 'pro-women's rights'.
Apatheist Account2 1 month ago
How were they able to plan a Harry Potter themed event without her say-so anyway? That's trampling all over her copyright. If she hasn't agreed to it and agreed royalties, it shouldn't be happening. I'm sure she'll continue to stand up for women's rights, and men have no right to comment on what women should and should not be forced to accept.
Sabrina Wade 1 month ago
She doesn't stand for women's rights though. She's a raving misogynist and a racist.
Load More Replies... 
Nova Rook 1 month ago
Of course she is going to mock the civil treatment of people she resents. She is not a good person.
UKGrandad 1 month ago (edited)
When you've spent millions of pounds (or dollars) of your own money to set up a rápe crisis centre and shelter for abúsed women and girls, your opinion on who qualifies as a good person might then carry some weight. Until then you'll just be another whiner cheering on those trying to destroy women's rights. Feel free to make your usual bleating about lies and stalkers.
Load More Replies... JB 1 month ago
No, I don’t think so. Try reading the prose “First they came” written by Martin Niemölle. We must speak out against bigotry whenever, wherever, we see it because if we stop, thinking that silence will drown her out, all that’s left is the voices of hate.
Load More Replies... JB 1 month ago
I didn’t expect to laugh out loud reading this however Just No Rowling succeeded in making me splutter with her declaration that ‘a “former professional relationship” does not give Watson the right to critique me and my views in public.’ Sunshine, when you post your views publicly and use your platform to promote hate we *all* have the right to critique you.
UKGrandad 1 month ago (edited)
Rowling didn't say that Watson does not have the right to critique her. That is both a misquote and out of context. Her exact words, in her response to Watson's recent statement about always feeling grateful to Rowling despite her views, were "I’m not owed eternal agreement from any actor who once played a character I created. The idea is as ludicrous as me checking with the boss I had when I was twenty-one for what opinions I should hold these days ...However, Emma and Dan in particular have both made it clear over the last few years that they think our former professional association gives them a particular right – nay, obligation – to critique me and my views in public.. Emma is rightly free to disagree with me and indeed to discuss her feelings about me in public – but I have the same right, and I’ve finally decided to exercise it."
Load More Replies... FreeTheUnicorn 1 month ago
She cares so little about it that she... Complains publicly and gives them free publicity?
UKGrandad 1 month ago
She isn't complaining, she's mocking, and rightly so.
Load More Replies... Boris Long-Johnson 1 month ago
I’m pretty sure she still retains the rights for a lot of Harry Potter stuff. Every time you buy Harry Potter, she gets a cut.
QuickSilver20061 1 month ago
I wanted to add my two cents on this article because I am a resident of BC and I am Absolutely Disgusted at the behaviour of the Vancouver's Parks & Recreation board. They shouldn't have pandered to the mentally ill because they have pretty much become the laughing stock of Canada and I honestly think the whole board should Resign in Disgrace
UKGrandad 1 month ago
From the article: "The event, first announced in early September, was immediately met with massive backlash and criticism from the public." Did it? Or did a very small number of people from one particular 'community' make a great deal of noise? Still, I suppose that accurate reporting doesn't make for such a dramatic story, which is also why Rowling is always described as being 'anti-trans' and 'anti LGBT' rather than the more honest 'pro-women's rights'.
Apatheist Account2 1 month ago
How were they able to plan a Harry Potter themed event without her say-so anyway? That's trampling all over her copyright. If she hasn't agreed to it and agreed royalties, it shouldn't be happening. I'm sure she'll continue to stand up for women's rights, and men have no right to comment on what women should and should not be forced to accept.
Sabrina Wade 1 month ago
She doesn't stand for women's rights though. She's a raving misogynist and a racist.
Load More Replies... Nova Rook 1 month ago
Of course she is going to mock the civil treatment of people she resents. She is not a good person.
UKGrandad 1 month ago (edited)
When you've spent millions of pounds (or dollars) of your own money to set up a rápe crisis centre and shelter for abúsed women and girls, your opinion on who qualifies as a good person might then carry some weight. Until then you'll just be another whiner cheering on those trying to destroy women's rights. Feel free to make your usual bleating about lies and stalkers.
Load More Replies... You May Like "Child Actors End Up Becoming Terrible Adult Actors": Stranger Things Star Brutally Slammed For His Performance In New Season 179 Easy & Hard Harry Potter Trivia Questions for Potterverse Parties "A Nightmare": Fans React To Millie Bobby Brown’s Story About How She Started Dating Jake Bongiovi
Analice Couto
Eligijus Sinkunas
Lei RV
Related on Bored Panda
8
36