Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

“Audacity And Entitlement”: James Van Der Beek Owed $260k In Unpaid Taxes At One Point
James Van Der Beek and woman outdoors in natural light, a candid close-up highlighting Van Der Beek tax problems topic.

“Audacity And Entitlement”: James Van Der Beek Owed $260k In Unpaid Taxes At One Point

18

ADVERTISEMENT

James Van Der Beek’s financial history has come under intense scrutiny following his heartbreaking passing on February 11, after a “long and courageous battle” with stage 3 colorectal cancer.

Newly surfaced reports indicate that the late 48-year-old star faced significant tax issues, which, combined with a recent multimillion-dollar property purchase, have fueled controversy surrounding a GoFundMe campaign for his family.

Highlights
  • James Van Der Beek’s family GoFundMe sparked fresh backlash after a massive IRS tax lien from 2021 resurfaced online.
  • Netizens questioned the timing of the fundraiser after reports revealed the actor and his wife purchased a $4.76 million Texas ranch just weeks before his passing.
  • While critics called the situation “suspicious,” supporters defended James, saying he was simply trying to secure a "home" for his wife and their six kids.

A GoFundMe page was launched after his passing for his wife, Kimberly Van Der Beek, and their six young children to cover medical bills and living expenses.

While some netizens sympathized with the family, others reacted to the tax problem revelation, writing online, “If your gonna start a GoFund for money hours after someone’s d**d expect your whole financial situation to be dissected. They’ve bought this scrutiny on themselves…”

BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting

    James Van Der Beek’s massive IRS tax problem has been revealed amid his family’s ongoing GoFundMe controversy

    Image credits: vanderkimberly

    ADVERTISEMENT

    James Van Der Beek’s passing was confirmed by his wife, Kimberly Van Der Beek, following the actor’s August 2023 diagnosis with stage 3 colorectal cancer.

    Throughout his treatment process, the Dawson’s Creek star was vocal about his financial struggles while battling the illness.

    Following his passing, James’ family and friends launched a GoFundMe page for Kimberly and their six children: Olivia, 15, Joshua, 13, Annabel, 12, Emilia, 9, Gwendolyn, 7, and Jeremiah, 4.

    Image credits: vanderjames

    Part of the fundraising message read, “Throughout his illness, the family faced not only emotional challenges but also significant financial strain as they did everything possible to support James and provide for his care.”

    “The costs of James’s medical care and the extended fight against cancer have left the family out of funds.”

    Amid this, a report by Realtor revealed that the actor and his wife purchased a $4.76 million ranch in Spicewood, Texas, on January 9, just weeks before James’ passing.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: vanderjames

    The Van Der Beeks had reportedly been renting the property since 2020, and, according to the late actor’s representative, they purchased it “with the help of friends through a trust so they could shift from rent to mortgage.”

    The purchase sparked controversy due to the timing, with many critics questioning why a family with significant real estate assets was seeking public donations.

    The resurfaced details from 2021 split the internet, as some sympathized with the grieving family while others questioned their lifestyle choices

    Image credits: Realtor.com

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    One netizen harshly criticized, “So they want to stay in their big house and keep the kids in private school. I feel bad for them but maybe cut back and you won’t need handouts.”

    Others echoed similar sentiments, writing, “I mean, maybe they can’t afford their home. It’s pretty common to downsize when your spouse d*es. It’s a huge ranch with acres.”

    Yesterday, TMZ reported that James and Kimberly struggled with a massive federal tax lien issued in November 2021 for unpaid taxes.

    According to the outlet, the IRS declared the couple owed $269,328.62 in unpaid taxes.

    Image credits: vanderjames

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The lien was reportedly paid off in full and released in April 2022, a year before the 48-year-old’s cancer diagnosis.

    The resurfaced details sparked mixed reactions on social media, as some supported the actor’s decision to purchase the ranch, while others criticized him for making an “expensive purchase” while the family was already struggling financially.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    One critic wrote, “They should have never purchased a home that expensive. I doubt the people who donated thought a chunk of the money would be going towards paying for a 4.7 million dollar home. The audacity.”

    The 48-year-old reportedly passed away at his $4.76 million ranch in Austin, Texas, after a nearly three-year battle with colorectal cancer

    Image credits: vanderjames

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Another in agreement said, “He was a great guy and all, but how did he expect to pay for all of the things you need to keep a house worth that much.”

    “It’s wild that he purchased a 4.8 million dollar home in January, and friends paid the down payment! Bonkers. His wife says there’s nothing left and a GFM is started… Something really stinks here… A 4.8 million home is absurd, and they’re broke??!! They are living way beyond their means, and the people who donated are paying for it. The audacity and entitlement is breathtaking,” commented a third netizen.

    Image credits: vanderjames

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    “You are in tax debt. Your friends help you buy a $4m house… No problem with him wanting his family to remain in the same home after he passed if he was able to afford it. BUT, why then the need for a go fund me from the public? If they were unable to maintain that level of living they should have downsized…”

    Meanwhile, supporters argued that “states won’t let a home be taken in a bankruptcy action so this may have been done to protect his family.”

    One person said in James’ defense, “He was renting it for several years & just now purchased it. I’m sure he wanted to make sure his wife & 6 children were taken care of before he d**d.”

    Image credits: vanderjames

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Another wrote, “This isn’t just a home. It is a ranch. It where they have precious memories. James wanted to leave his family a place he knew they would be safe. He wanted his children to grow up without worry. Isn’t that what all parents want?”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “Unless you’ve walked in someone else’s shoes, don’t pass judgement… If he bought something like that it was because he was trying to make sure his family has a place to live after he d**d.”

    Last year, James auctioned off memorabilia from Dawson’s Creek and Varsity Blues to raise money for his treatment due to hefty medical bills

    Image credits: vanderjames

    In a 2021 interview with Austin Life, James spoke about his and Kimberly’s decision to move into their Texas ranch, which they were renting at the time, as the couple “wanted to give the children space and we wanted them to live in nature.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “It’s a magical place. There’s an energy that transcends any one religion or ideology.”

    As Bored Panda previously reported, last year James raised money with auction house Propstore by selling off collector items from Dawson’s Creek, including parts of his wardrobe, props, and set pieces, to help pay for his colorectal cancer treatment.

    Image credits: vanderjames

    He told People, “I’ve been storing these treasures for years, waiting for the right time to do something with them, and with all of the recent unexpected twists and turns life has presented recently, it’s clear that the time is now.”

    “He wanted to secure the home for his wife and children when he knew the end was near. At least they have a roof over their heads,” one netizen wrote

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Amita Kumari

    Amita Kumari

    Writer, News Writer

    Read more »

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Read less »
    Amita Kumari

    Amita Kumari

    Writer, News Writer

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    What do you think ?
    The Chronic Insomniac
    Community Member
    5 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Maybe this is an unpopular opinion but my husband died unexpectedly in 2022 at age 48 and I lost EVERYTHING and ended up selling most of our belongings for pennies on the dollar and now live in a bedroom in my mothers home thousands of miles away from where I spent my life with my husband. The audacity to buy an almost 5 million dollar ranch and then ask for handouts in order to pay your bills is wild to me. Downvote me if you must.

    truthteller
    Community Member
    3 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I really think he was a nice guy and seems like a lovely family. With that being said, they don't need a house that big. Maybe downsize into a 2 million dollar house on 5 acres?? That wouldn't exactly be skid row. Also, did he not have a significant life insurance policy with 6 kids?? And finally, I think the cost of his treatments was so high due to a lot of experimental, snake oil medicine. Overall, seems like there were some poor choices made. I just really, really hope the family actually needs the money and is not taking advantage of an unsuspecting public.

    SlightlyTarnished
    Community Member
    4 minutes ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The biggest issue is health care in the US. He had health insurance while acting and a member of the actors union. He lost that insurance prior to his illness due to not working enough days per year to qualify, he chose not to buy insurance on the market like so many Americans have to do. To opt to not purchase coverage when you have a family is insane, I understand the costs can be a struggle for some people, that's why so many previously uninsured people opted for insurance thanks to The ACA (Obama Care) which now the MAGA crowd is trying to destroy. ACA insurance is based on income, and prohibits insurance companies from denying coverage, charging higher premiums, or excluding treatment for pre-existing conditions. So, the reality of Van Der Beeks' situation is they made a conscious decision to not secure insurance. They also made a conscious decision to purchase a home they were not qualified to buy, nor could pay the mortgage, through "assistance" of a friend. It all just seems negligent on the family's part.

    Load More Comments
    The Chronic Insomniac
    Community Member
    5 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Maybe this is an unpopular opinion but my husband died unexpectedly in 2022 at age 48 and I lost EVERYTHING and ended up selling most of our belongings for pennies on the dollar and now live in a bedroom in my mothers home thousands of miles away from where I spent my life with my husband. The audacity to buy an almost 5 million dollar ranch and then ask for handouts in order to pay your bills is wild to me. Downvote me if you must.

    truthteller
    Community Member
    3 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I really think he was a nice guy and seems like a lovely family. With that being said, they don't need a house that big. Maybe downsize into a 2 million dollar house on 5 acres?? That wouldn't exactly be skid row. Also, did he not have a significant life insurance policy with 6 kids?? And finally, I think the cost of his treatments was so high due to a lot of experimental, snake oil medicine. Overall, seems like there were some poor choices made. I just really, really hope the family actually needs the money and is not taking advantage of an unsuspecting public.

    SlightlyTarnished
    Community Member
    4 minutes ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The biggest issue is health care in the US. He had health insurance while acting and a member of the actors union. He lost that insurance prior to his illness due to not working enough days per year to qualify, he chose not to buy insurance on the market like so many Americans have to do. To opt to not purchase coverage when you have a family is insane, I understand the costs can be a struggle for some people, that's why so many previously uninsured people opted for insurance thanks to The ACA (Obama Care) which now the MAGA crowd is trying to destroy. ACA insurance is based on income, and prohibits insurance companies from denying coverage, charging higher premiums, or excluding treatment for pre-existing conditions. So, the reality of Van Der Beeks' situation is they made a conscious decision to not secure insurance. They also made a conscious decision to purchase a home they were not qualified to buy, nor could pay the mortgage, through "assistance" of a friend. It all just seems negligent on the family's part.

    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT