Job Applicant Sparks Viral Debate After Refusing To Do 90-Minute Test Task For Free
A recruiter ignited controversy after rejecting a candidate who refused to complete a 90-minute skill assessment test.
The employer, who goes by M. Stanfield on X (formerly known as Twitter), expressed his frustration when a Gen Z job seeker refused to complete a task for an investment analyst position.
The post read:
“Me: [I] really enjoyed the call. Please see attached financial modeling test.
- Recruiter faces backlash for rejecting Gen Z applicant who refused a 90-minute unpaid skill test.
- Online critics argue that a 90-min test is excessive without knowing where the applicant stands in the hiring process.
- Research shows a trend towards skills-based hiring over traditional resume evaluations.
“Gen Z applicant: this looks like a lot of work. Without knowing where I stand in the process, I’m not comfortable spending 90 minutes in Excel.
“Me:…well…I can tell you where you stand now.”
A job recruiter’s reason for rejecting a candidate was met with criticism online
Image credits: Pexels/Nicola Barts
In follow-up posts, M. Stanfield shared that the skill assessment test was “one of the first things discussed in the interview.”
He also wrote that “if an analyst can’t hammer that out in 90 minutes, they’re not the right person.”
Furthermore, the recruiter admitted that if the job applicant had asked to be compensated for the task, he would’ve “gladly paid and probably hired” the Gen Zer.
M. Stanfield’s posts were met with criticism on social media, with many users pointing out that an hour and a half is a lot of time to work for free.
“To be fair, a lot of places are just using applicants for free labor. The job doesn’t exist. The ‘test’ is the only work they need done,” someone suggested.
“Applicant is right. Unless you offered to compensate for that 90 minutes. He has no idea how many applicants remain in the process. He probably has interviews with other businesses. Effort vs. reward definitely not there for this. Good for him,” another person penned.
The recruiter complained about the job seeker refusing to complete a 90-minute skill assessment test to advance in the hiring process
Image credits: Pexels/Fauxels
Another X user chimed in, “Why would someone accept spending 90 mins of their time jumping through hoops when they might not even get the job?”
Then, a separate individual shared his experience devoting time to a skill assessment test, only to be ignored and not get any feedback from the company later. “I don’t mind doing work for free to show what I can do. But last time I did this, the company ghosted me after I spent a weekend on a take-home,” he wrote.
“Without knowing where I stand in the process, I’m not comfortable spending 90 minutes in Excel,” the applicant stated
Image credits: Unsplash/Campaign Creators
Another employer also weighed in on the situation, saying that skill assessment tests are a better indicator of whether an applicant is fit for a role compared to a résumé or a job interview.
“I’ve watched people that present themselves so well fall flat when asked to do real work. Also, I’ve seen people who were on the fence about just kill it. When you hire these people, you want to invest in them and have them there for years,” they wrote.
To which someone responded, “Totally makes sense but the caveat is I think you need to be a final stage candidate. Not as a first-round filter for 100 people.”
Generation Z, sometimes known as “Zoomers,” is a cohort that spans from 1997 to 2012. Unlike millennials, Gen Zers are referred to as the first fully “digitally native” generation, given that they grew up with social media.
According to a 2023 survey carried out by Indeed and The Center for Generational Kinetics, more than half of respondents aged 16-24 stated that they’ve been “ghosted” by hiring managers.
Me: really enjoyed the call. Please see attached financial modeling test
Gen Z applicant: this looks like a lot of work. Without knowing where I stand in the process, I’m not comfortable spending 90 minutes in Excel
Me:…well…I can tell you where you stand now
— m. stanfield (@mu2myoc) April 23, 2024
Additionally, 4 in 10 Gen Zers said the most frustrating aspect of looking for a job was not receiving feedback from employers when they don’t get hired.
When it comes to drawn-out hiring processes, the response was clear: half said they wouldn’t apply for a job that required three separate interviews.
Meanwhile, a 2022 survey from the Society for Human Resource Management found that 79% of HR professionals believe that scores on skills assessments are just as (or more important) than traditional criteria in hiring decisions.
New research indicates a growing inclination toward skills-based hiring, marking a departure from conventional résumés. Over 70% of survey respondents—employees and employers from different continents— stated that skills-based hiring is more effective than relying on résumés, according to a report published by Test Gorilla.
“I wouldn’t do a 90-minute task for free,” a social media user wrote
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
You May Also Like
Woman Refuses To Chip In For Babysitting Because She Doesn’t Even Have Kids, Asks If She’s A Jerk
Do you think childless individuals should be expected to chip in for group babysitting costs during friend gatherings?
17 Y.O. Is Done Sharing Her Birthday With Her Late Twin, Parents Are Not Having It
Do you think the girl should be allowed to celebrate her birthday without the remembrance of her deceased twin?
I've done technical skills tests that would be part of the job. However, everyone had the same test, it wasn't work that needed to be done, and the test was limited to 30 minutes at the most. The reason for the test is because some people lie about their skills or over-estimate their abilities. Example: someone said they knew Photoshop, but a test revealed that they only knew one tool.
test = free job. No thanks. If you exploit me in the application phase you will exploit me also later.
It's not exploitation, it's verifying skills. When employers have moved away from conventional resumes to instead hire based on skills, which means they're not necessarily looking at education or past employment, how are they supposed to know that you aren't full of $hit? You can spend the years and gain the immense amount of debt getting the paper work, or you can spend an hour or two proving yourself. The word of a stranger who has motivation to misrepresent themselves isn't worth much.
Load More Replies...
I've had to do mock assessments for jobs, but it takes no more than 15 minutes. It's not anything that the company could use for anything other than a skill assessment. I've worked in financial institutions and it's just more of a test of how to interact with people and not to give away account information if the person isn't on the account. But this particular instance sounds like they wanted free labor.
I've done technical skills tests that would be part of the job. However, everyone had the same test, it wasn't work that needed to be done, and the test was limited to 30 minutes at the most. The reason for the test is because some people lie about their skills or over-estimate their abilities. Example: someone said they knew Photoshop, but a test revealed that they only knew one tool.
test = free job. No thanks. If you exploit me in the application phase you will exploit me also later.
It's not exploitation, it's verifying skills. When employers have moved away from conventional resumes to instead hire based on skills, which means they're not necessarily looking at education or past employment, how are they supposed to know that you aren't full of $hit? You can spend the years and gain the immense amount of debt getting the paper work, or you can spend an hour or two proving yourself. The word of a stranger who has motivation to misrepresent themselves isn't worth much.
Load More Replies... I've had to do mock assessments for jobs, but it takes no more than 15 minutes. It's not anything that the company could use for anything other than a skill assessment. I've worked in financial institutions and it's just more of a test of how to interact with people and not to give away account information if the person isn't on the account. But this particular instance sounds like they wanted free labor.
27
35