Have a closer look and you'll see that Stephen McMennamy's photos are not your usual Photoshop manipulations. Previously featured on Bored Panda, the art director comes up with all sorts of weird objects and scenarios by seamlessly combining two different photos into one. And he's back with more awesome work!
"It’s really just from looking around and seeing what things are out in the world might make for an interesting fit or what would make for a nice contrast once combined," McMennamy told PetaPixel. "As far as process, it’s just a matter of me hunting things down and aiming for the cleanest shot possible."
More info: stephenmc.com | Facebook | Instagram | Tumblr
This post may include affiliate links.
Lightbulb + Egg
Excavator + Ice Cream Scoop
This is probably my favorite one! What a creative concept of two completely different ideas put together!
Banana + Car
Cupcake + Toothbrush
Hair + Brush
Headphones + Donuts
Candy + Garden Sprayer
Fries + Smokes
My Twirling 5 Year Old + A Hibiscus Flower
Grapes + Balloon
Paintbrush + Bananas
If the brush is in yellow paint, would be more awesome. I like the idea
Cauliflower + Poodle
Drink Umbrella + Beach Umbrella
Green Paint + Daylily
Candle + Flashlight
Cotton Stuffing + Gold Necklaces
Wood Posts + Fry Container
I can see all the lines. That's not the point. It's a mashup, it shows where one ends and another begins. Use your imagination.
Pvc Pipe + Chocolate Milk & Straw
Soda Bottles + Christmas Lights
what a unique way of putting together things that don't usually fit together!
How can it be seamlessly if you can most assuredly see a seam in every picture? Not with the two subjects, either. The backgrounds are not even close in some of these. The concept is cool, the description is misleading.
what a unique way of putting together things that don't usually fit together!
How can it be seamlessly if you can most assuredly see a seam in every picture? Not with the two subjects, either. The backgrounds are not even close in some of these. The concept is cool, the description is misleading.
