Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

This Female Body Part Was Deemed Useless And Erased From Textbooks, Now Scientists Say They Got It Wrong
Microscopic image showing the female body part once deemed useless now reconsidered by scientists in new research.

This Female Body Part Was Deemed Useless And Erased From Textbooks, Now Scientists Say They Got It Wrong

30

ADVERTISEMENT

For more than a century, a tiny structure connected to the female reproductive system was treated as little more than a useless leftover.

The rete ovarii, first described in humans in 1870, eventually disappeared from modern anatomy textbooks. But new research suggests this small structure may actually communicate with the ovary, respond to hormones, and release proteins that could help regulate ovarian function.

Highlights
  • New research suggested the rete ovarii may communicate with the ovary.
  • The tiny structure was once considered vestigial and eventually disappeared from modern anatomy textbooks.
  • Researchers stressed that the findings came mainly from mice.

The findings have sparked a fresh conversation about how science still has to learn about female anatomy.

“Why has it taken until 2026 for medical researchers to actually FOCUS on female biology/healthcare?” wrote one netizen.

RELATED:

    Rete Ovarii has a distinctive horseshoe-like shape and sits around the base of the ovary

    eLife/D. Anbarci et al

    The rete ovarii, often shortened to RO, is a small network of tubes connected to the ovary.

    Scientists first described it in humans in 1870. It also exists in several other mammals, including cows, sheep, pigs, dogs, monkeys, and guinea pigs.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    For years, however, researchers did not know what it actually did. Because they could not see an obvious purpose, they eventually classified it as vestigial.

    In simple terms, that means scientists believed it was a leftover from earlier development that no longer had an important job.

    The rete ovarii even appeared in early editions of Gray’s Anatomy, one of the most famous anatomy textbooks. But over time, it disappeared from newer editions and was treated as a functionless part of the adult ovary.

    That old assumption is now being questioned.

    A research team found that the tiny structure is far more active than expected

    In a study published by National Library of Medicine in 2024, scientists studied the rete ovarii in mice to understand its development and possible function.

    They discovered that it is not one solid piece of tissue. Instead, it has three connected regions: the intraovarian rete, the connecting rete, and the extraovarian rete.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The extraovarian rete, or EOR, is particularly interesting. It forms a twisted tube with a wider end and contains cells that appear able to move material actively.

    Researchers injected a fluorescent dye into the EOR to see where fluid moved.

    The dye traveled from the rete ovarii toward the ovary. When they experimented in the opposite direction, putting the dye into the ovary, it did not travel back into the rete.

    eLife/D. Anbarci et al

    That suggested the structure has a specific direction of fluid movement rather than sitting beside the ovary doing nothing.

    The team also found evidence that the rete ovarii produces proteins.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Using laboratory techniques to analyze the material released by the structure, researchers identified several candidate proteins, including IGFBP2. This protein can influence the availability of growth factors involved in ovarian follicle development.

    That matters because ovarian follicles contain immature eggs and play an important role in reproduction.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Researchers also found that rete ovarii act like an “antenna” for the ovary

    eLife/D. Anbarci et al

    The extraovarian rete sits close to blood vessels, nerves, and immune cells. Its cells also contain receptors for hormones such as estrogen and progesterone.

    Those findings led the researchers to suggest that the structure could receive information from different parts of the body and pass signals toward the ovary.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    This study described the EOR as potentially acting like an “antenna.”

    In simple terms, the idea is that the structure could sense changes involving hormones, nerves, blood flow, or immune activity and then respond by releasing proteins into the ovary.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Researchers have also found that some of the genes active in the rete ovarii change with estrogen levels.

    eLife/D. Anbarci et al

    That raises the possibility that the structure responds to the body’s reproductive cycle rather than remaining inactive.

    Dilara Anbarci, a developmental biologist at the University of Michigan and one of the researchers involved, said, “There’s still so much we can’t even begin to comprehend about female anatomy.”

    She added that she hoped the research would encourage scientists to take another look at what they do not yet understand about the ovary.

    The findings are interesting, but researchers have not proved that the rete ovarii is essential for human fertility

    eLife/D. Anbarci et al

    The main experiments were conducted in mice, and scientists are still working out exactly what the structure does.

    Serge Nef, a developmental biologist at the University of Geneva who was not involved in the research, told Science News that the findings show that “something is going on,” but stressed that it is still the beginning of the story.

    Researchers have not yet removed or turned off the rete ovarii in a living mouse to see whether doing so directly changes fertility.

    @michelleisawolf Welcome back #comedy #womenshealth #science #hormones ♬ original sound – Michelle Wolf

    An older study also suggests that normal follicles can still develop when researchers remove the tissue from which the rete ovarii develops early on. That could mean the structure has a supportive role rather than being necessary.

    And while humans have been confirmed to have the rete ovarii, scientists do not yet know whether the human structure works exactly like the one observed in mice.

    For now, the research shows that the rete ovarii appears to be much more biologically active than scientists once assumed. It does not prove that the structure is the key to human fertility.

    The story has also sparked a broader discussion about how medical science has studied female bodies throughout history

    Cottonbro Studio/Pexels (not the actual photo)

    Adam Taylor, a professor of anatomy at Lancaster University who was not involved in the study, explained that scientists in the late 1800s did not have the technology researchers have today.

    “When this structure was first discovered in the late 1800s, it was assumed that it had no purpose because scientists couldn’t see its function within the body,” Taylor told Live Science.

    Modern imaging, microscopy and molecular techniques now allow researchers to observe things that would have been difficult to detect in the past, including changes in blood flow and the proteins produced by tiny structures.

    That is why scientists can now ask questions about the rete ovarii that earlier researchers could not easily answer.

    Kaboom Pics/Pexels (not the actual photo)

    The research has also brought renewed attention to other gaps in the history of women’s health research.

    The source noted that the National Institutes of Health did not formally require including women as subjects in federally funded clinical research until 1993.

    However, the idea that male doctors “deleted” the rete ovarii because they decided it was useless is more complicated than that viral claim suggests.

    The historical record showed that scientists struggled to determine the structure’s function, while advances in modern technology have now opened the door to studying it in much greater detail.

    “This is the first time I’ve heard of this organ,” wrote one netizen

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook
    Samridhi Goel
    Samridhi Goel

    Writer, News Writer

    Read more »

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Read less »
    Samridhi Goel
    Samridhi Goel

    Writer, News Writer

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    What do you think ?
    Seedy Vine
    Community Member
    1 month ago

    When oh when will we be people?! smh

    Upward Gravity
    Community Member
    1 month ago

    Oh my!

    Load More Replies...
    Tabitha
    Community Member
    1 month ago (edited)

    “When this structure was first discovered in the late 1800s, it was assumed that it had no purpose because scientists couldn’t see its function within the body,“ Funny, the appendix was discovered in the 1730s, yet it wasn’t dismissed even though it truly has little to no impact on the body BECAUSE men have appendixes. But a part of a woman’s body that was initially thought to have no impact on reproduction is so totally dismissed—-left out of medical books and education for two centuries—-that even modern medical professionals don’t know about it. Go f*cking figure, right?

    Rick Murray
    Community Member
    1 month ago

    Medicine: Trust us, we know what we're doing. Also medicine: No idea what this bit of a woman is for, so let's just call it useless and pretend it doesn't exist.

    Tabitha
    Community Member
    1 month ago

    If it’s not in or on a man, we don’t need to study it and try to understand it—-even if it turns out to have a genuine medical purpose. That’s why women died from heart attacks for so many years, because women’s heart attacks do not present in the same way that men’s heart attacks do. So they went undetected and women were sent home, essentially to d*e in their beds, by doctors after being told they just had the flu, or maybe their period was going to start in a day or two, or they were merely imagining, or were hysterical, or were overreacting to, the symptoms they were experiencing. All because researchers only studied men, because their results were more u inform, and women’s results were all over the map. You would think all those variables in women’s results would be the EXACT reason why they should be studied! But no, they wanted easy, uniform results, so they ignored 51% of the population and let them suffer and d*e needlessly.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Seedy Vine
    Community Member
    1 month ago

    When oh when will we be people?! smh

    Upward Gravity
    Community Member
    1 month ago

    Oh my!

    Load More Replies...
    Tabitha
    Community Member
    1 month ago (edited)

    “When this structure was first discovered in the late 1800s, it was assumed that it had no purpose because scientists couldn’t see its function within the body,“ Funny, the appendix was discovered in the 1730s, yet it wasn’t dismissed even though it truly has little to no impact on the body BECAUSE men have appendixes. But a part of a woman’s body that was initially thought to have no impact on reproduction is so totally dismissed—-left out of medical books and education for two centuries—-that even modern medical professionals don’t know about it. Go f*cking figure, right?

    ADVERTISEMENT
    Rick Murray
    Community Member
    1 month ago

    Medicine: Trust us, we know what we're doing. Also medicine: No idea what this bit of a woman is for, so let's just call it useless and pretend it doesn't exist.

    Tabitha
    Community Member
    1 month ago

    If it’s not in or on a man, we don’t need to study it and try to understand it—-even if it turns out to have a genuine medical purpose. That’s why women died from heart attacks for so many years, because women’s heart attacks do not present in the same way that men’s heart attacks do. So they went undetected and women were sent home, essentially to d*e in their beds, by doctors after being told they just had the flu, or maybe their period was going to start in a day or two, or they were merely imagining, or were hysterical, or were overreacting to, the symptoms they were experiencing. All because researchers only studied men, because their results were more u inform, and women’s results were all over the map. You would think all those variables in women’s results would be the EXACT reason why they should be studied! But no, they wanted easy, uniform results, so they ignored 51% of the population and let them suffer and d*e needlessly.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT