Traveling etiquette isn’t always respected amongst all travelers.
We have all experienced sitting on a plane with the occasional naked-foot dimwit, greedy seat space robber, and backseat kicker. But for those who particularly hold animosity towards the occasional loud sound produced by the younger ones, there might now be a silver lining.
Turkish leisure airline Corendon is introducing a child-free zone on its A350 flights between Amsterdam and the Dutch Caribbean island of Curacao.
The carrier’s only adult area, which little ones are completely banned from, is set to launch in just a few weeks from November 3 this year, with future passengers already enabled to book seats in the distinctive area.
Corendon Airlines has launched an adult-only zone on some of its planes
Image credits: AlexVog (not the actual photo)
According to Corendon, the area in the front of the aircraft will feature nine ‘XL’ seats with additional legroom and a total of 93 standard seats.
The airline explained in a press release published in August that the specially designated zone is “intended for travelers traveling without children and for business travelers who want to work in a quiet environment”. It also informed that the introduction of the only adult zone also has a positive effect on parents with children, as they won’t have to “worry as much about possible reactions from fellow passengers if their child is busier or crying”.
The zone will be physically separated from the rest of the aircraft by walls and curtains, “creating a shielded environment that contributes to a quiet and relaxing flight”, the airline wrote.
A seat reservation in the only adult zone will cost €45 per single journey, while an XL seat in the only adult zone will cost €100 each way. Moreover, the only adult zone will exclusively become accessible to passengers aged 16 and over.
Passengers must be at least 16 in order to sit in the specially designated zones
Image credits: hwilson8 (not the actual photo)
“On board our flights we always strive to respond to the different needs of our customers,” Atilay Uslu, the founder of Corendon, said. He continued: “We are also the first Dutch airline to introduce the only adult zone because we try to appeal to travelers who are looking for some extra peace and quiet during their flight.
“We also believe that this can have a positive effect on parents traveling with small children. They can enjoy the flight without worrying when their children make more noise.”
The announcement is a rather unusual advancement in airplane history, seeing as carriers tend to follow strict policies where pets are forbidden, and smoking has long been banished entirely.
As a result, people expressed divided reactions, with some condemning the new zone altogether.
A man wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter): “More like a crying adults section.”
“A babe should sue because of age discrimination,” another person commented.
A separate individual wrote: “So apparently airlines are considering making ‘child-free zones’ on planes, and I can’t decide if this is a dystopian shift or not, but generally it’s really sad how little tolerance people have for children and babies – even acting like they shouldn’t be in public.”
“The ‘adults’ that can’t deal maturely with a crying baby usually ARE the problem.. so I’ll pass on paying extra to be grouped in with those unstable snowflakes,” another X user exclaimed.
Child-free zones on airplanes have sparked a divided conversation amongst many travelers with most of them thinking it’s rather “disgusting”
Image credits: LizardKangz_95
Image credits: danielgodfrey
As Corendon’s adult zone sparked a lengthy debate online, other people saw the news as a rather positive one, as a person posted on X: “16 is too young. I’d raise it to 21.
“Have you ever seen a drunken 16-year-old on the way to a Caribbean vacation?”
Another X user chimed in: “Might be a good idea. Parents worry about their kids being bothersome.. relieve some pressure for them too.” A mom commented: “I have kids, and I approve this.”
“I have 2 small kids. It is a fantastic idea. All airlines should do it. In fact, they should introduce adult-only flights,” another parent wrote.
A separate person commented: “I would be an immediate frequent flyer for an adults-only airline.
Image credits: LizardKangz_95
Image credits: TheWiseAmanita
Image credits: cokeandcake
Image credits: gremlinscottges
Image credits: michaelxdillman
Image credits: LysanderBoomer
Corendon Airlines isn’t the only carrier offering a special zone on planes, dedicated to quiet and peace.
AirAsia introduced last month new “quiet zones” on their X flights, “simply because we know that sometimes all you need is some peace and quiet for a more pleasant journey with us,” the airline wrote.
The quiet zone promises little to no noise, zero disturbances, and soft ambient lighting.
Moreover, children below the age of 10 are forbidden into this zone, which is exclusively available on AirAsia X A330 aircraft that fly to countries such as South Korea, Japan, Australia, and Taiwan.
Back in 2016, Indian airline IndiGo also launched its own child-free quiet zone aboard some of its planes.
The carrier wrote: “Keeping in mind the comfort and convenience of all passengers, row numbers one to four and 11 to 14 are generally kept as a Quiet Zone on IndiGo flights.
“These zones have been created for business travelers who prefer to use the quiet time to do their work.”
As reported by The National News, a survey conducted on 3,292 travelers in the UAE revealed opinions about children on planes.
Of the 3,292 respondents, 60 percent said that they had been disrupted by a child on a plane, and 64 percent said there should be child-free areas on planes.
Only 14 percent of respondents agreed with the suggestion that children should be banned from business class – but more than half of them said they would take a child-free flight if one were available.
Others, however, think it’s a great initiative
Image credits: SpiceyRenfro
Image credits: Finnish_Agorist
Image credits: KellyOwens9997
Image credits: anon_DAOT
Image credits: seacheo
Image credits: Dosaku
Image credits: eugene71408194
Image credits: JamesZizron1
Image credits: missing_clue
Image credits: Dosaku
Image credits: anniodarone3
Really no different an intention than quiet cars on a train. Some people have to sleep, work, or generally have silence during their travel time. What’s the big deal in that? For those thinking it’s discriminatory and that “babies are people too,” what if you (or your child) are neurodivergent and/or super sound sensitive? Just because babies are little people who wail does that mean others should have to be subjected to a horrid traumatic experience inflight if there is another, more tranquil alternative?
The silence carts were also only introduced because more and more people decided to be loud a******s in public transport. I mean, I've no preference for noise or silence, but I very much do have a preference for people being considerate of eachother and not play loud music or shrieking "OMG SANDDDRAAAA AHIIIII IT'S BEEN AGESS NO I CAN TALK BABE TELL ME HOW YOU AAAAARREREE!!!!!" at the top of their lungs when on the phone. It's called sharing a public space, and people seem less and less capable of doing that.
Load More Replies...
I am someone who would happily pay more to sit in a child-free zone while traveling. I am always terrified when I fly, so I don't need the extra stimulation.
How is this controversial? There are quiet sections in trains too. There are hotels that are just for childfree people. Some people just find it hard to tolerate children (of strangers) in their vicinity. There is nothing wrong with that. Stop treating people who don’t like kids as if there is something wrong with them. They usually didn’t choose to dislike them.
(of strangers). That's the key for me. I can listen to a neice or nephew scream with no annoyance at all because I really care about them. Strangers though? No, I don't want to or have to listen to their children scream through an entire flight.
Load More Replies...
Really no different an intention than quiet cars on a train. Some people have to sleep, work, or generally have silence during their travel time. What’s the big deal in that? For those thinking it’s discriminatory and that “babies are people too,” what if you (or your child) are neurodivergent and/or super sound sensitive? Just because babies are little people who wail does that mean others should have to be subjected to a horrid traumatic experience inflight if there is another, more tranquil alternative?
The silence carts were also only introduced because more and more people decided to be loud a******s in public transport. I mean, I've no preference for noise or silence, but I very much do have a preference for people being considerate of eachother and not play loud music or shrieking "OMG SANDDDRAAAA AHIIIII IT'S BEEN AGESS NO I CAN TALK BABE TELL ME HOW YOU AAAAARREREE!!!!!" at the top of their lungs when on the phone. It's called sharing a public space, and people seem less and less capable of doing that.
Load More Replies... I am someone who would happily pay more to sit in a child-free zone while traveling. I am always terrified when I fly, so I don't need the extra stimulation.
How is this controversial? There are quiet sections in trains too. There are hotels that are just for childfree people. Some people just find it hard to tolerate children (of strangers) in their vicinity. There is nothing wrong with that. Stop treating people who don’t like kids as if there is something wrong with them. They usually didn’t choose to dislike them.
(of strangers). That's the key for me. I can listen to a neice or nephew scream with no annoyance at all because I really care about them. Strangers though? No, I don't want to or have to listen to their children scream through an entire flight.
Load More Replies...
46
100