After Seeing This Map With The Actual Size Of Every Country, You’ll Never Look At The World The Same
161Kviews
Probably most of us are familiar with the famous saying ‘my whole life was a lie,’ and we hate to tell you that, but it most likely was when it comes to the world map as we know it. Let’s just jump ahead and say there are no conspiracy theories here. It’s just not that simple laying out a globe on a flat piece of paper as in the Mercator map that we are all so familiar with. Good thing this climate data scientist took up the task of educating the masses on country size comparison and put up a map projection that shows real sizes together with those shown in regular maps. Even though his usual routines consist of analyzing various climate data and tracking climate change, geography is something tied closely together with his field of work. And if you follow him on social media, you will notice he has a genuine concern for environment and education, constantly filling his feed with various informational posts and interesting facts. In this particular map, he marked the true objects in the darker color and put them against a regular map so you can see the difference. Take a look at each continent on the planet and one extra treat – a supposedly huge island. Scroll down to see the true sized world map for yourself!
More info: Neil Kaye
World Map With True Country Size And Shape
Image credits: Neil Kaye
North America
Image credits: Neil Kaye
Russia
Image credits: Neil Kaye
Europe And Asia
Image credits: Neil Kaye
Africa
Image credits: Neil Kaye
Antarctica
Image credits: Neil Kaye
South America
Image credits: Neil Kaye
Greenland
Image credits: Neil Kaye
Australia
Image credits: Neil Kaye
161Kviews
Share on Facebook
What a weird and uninformative article. There are many map projections, and this is just the most common one, called the Mercator projection. There is no correct way to turn a sphere into a rectangle.
Exactly. I really don't see the point of this post. It's like having discovered hot water, as we say in Italy.
More precisely, there is no way to project a sphere onto a plane WITHOUT MISLEADING DISTORTION, and that is the heart of the matter. The Mercator projection is ignorant bullshit. It was published way back in *1569!!!* to illustrate known shipping lanes at the time. It was never intended as a map of the Earth because who knew? Do yourself a favor and walk into an office supply store or local library and stare at a GLOBE or satellite photos from space to educate yourself on the relative sizes of earth’s land masses and how TINY our own countries actually are. For example and comparison, did you know kilometer for kilometer how really, REALLY vast the continent of Africa is? original-1.jpg
The Mercator projection became popular because it's easy to navigate by. Quite an important feature for hundreds of years (basically up until GPS became ubiquitous), far from ignorant bullshit.
In this map there is not only a mercator projection, in darker shapes you get a kind of Peter projection too I mean a real proportional size that actually exists. Imagine that Spain is 5 km around and France another 5, you musn't draw a 10 km Spain and 2 km France.
This comment has been deleted.
This comment has been deleted.
This comment has been deleted.
When I was a kid in about the 3rd grade (1960-61) one of the cardboard globes in our classroom got damaged and was going to be discarded. I took it home and cut out the countries as best I could (thick cardboard, kids' scissors) and learned the same thing. I find it hard to fathom that anyone who has completed elementary school would be surprised to learn that the Mercator Projection grossly distorted the dimensions of nations.
Well, I know people of higher education actually believing the earth is flat!
Really? I have only ever heard of them on the internet.
The mercator projection distort Earth space (not "nations" really), but the closer you get to the pole, the bigger the distortion. Landmasses (and, OK, "nations") near the equator are only very slightly distorted.
Am I missing some obvious information. Which colour is the true representation and which colour is the commonly understood representation. Is it saying they are bigger or smaller? It's not clear at all!
The darker colour shows the true proportions, the pale colour shows how they're represented on our world maps.
Smaller one is the "true" one the bigger is the common
Yes. "In this particular map, he marked the true objects in the darker color and put them against a regular map so you can see the difference."
Yeah, what She asked. It is not clear.
As said above, there cannot be any "true" representation of a sphere on a rectangle. The lighter parts represent the Mercator projection (probabaly the most common, distort the areas but preserve the correct shapes). The darker parts are local projections, which DO NOT preserve shapes and size, yeah, this article is a fraud. But the smaller the country, the more accurate they are, especially regarding to the global mercator projection. Their main issue is that they disconnect countries borders, adding spaces in between that DO NOT exist. Keep in mind that none of them is true, they both distort space in there own way. The only "true" map is a globe, all projections distort space. You can see a bunch of existing projections here : https://www.jasondavies.com/maps/transition/ (From a mapmaker who is starting to get pissed of reading such misleading articles)
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Because you're undereducated, nothing to be braggin about
You sir, get this medal for being a jerk.
congratulations, you just won the asshole of the day award!
Neon_Sketch_Art like
candacejmchenry what
What a weird and uninformative article. There are many map projections, and this is just the most common one, called the Mercator projection. There is no correct way to turn a sphere into a rectangle.
Exactly. I really don't see the point of this post. It's like having discovered hot water, as we say in Italy.
More precisely, there is no way to project a sphere onto a plane WITHOUT MISLEADING DISTORTION, and that is the heart of the matter. The Mercator projection is ignorant bullshit. It was published way back in *1569!!!* to illustrate known shipping lanes at the time. It was never intended as a map of the Earth because who knew? Do yourself a favor and walk into an office supply store or local library and stare at a GLOBE or satellite photos from space to educate yourself on the relative sizes of earth’s land masses and how TINY our own countries actually are. For example and comparison, did you know kilometer for kilometer how really, REALLY vast the continent of Africa is? original-1.jpg
The Mercator projection became popular because it's easy to navigate by. Quite an important feature for hundreds of years (basically up until GPS became ubiquitous), far from ignorant bullshit.
In this map there is not only a mercator projection, in darker shapes you get a kind of Peter projection too I mean a real proportional size that actually exists. Imagine that Spain is 5 km around and France another 5, you musn't draw a 10 km Spain and 2 km France.
This comment has been deleted.
This comment has been deleted.
This comment has been deleted.
When I was a kid in about the 3rd grade (1960-61) one of the cardboard globes in our classroom got damaged and was going to be discarded. I took it home and cut out the countries as best I could (thick cardboard, kids' scissors) and learned the same thing. I find it hard to fathom that anyone who has completed elementary school would be surprised to learn that the Mercator Projection grossly distorted the dimensions of nations.
Well, I know people of higher education actually believing the earth is flat!
Really? I have only ever heard of them on the internet.
The mercator projection distort Earth space (not "nations" really), but the closer you get to the pole, the bigger the distortion. Landmasses (and, OK, "nations") near the equator are only very slightly distorted.
Am I missing some obvious information. Which colour is the true representation and which colour is the commonly understood representation. Is it saying they are bigger or smaller? It's not clear at all!
The darker colour shows the true proportions, the pale colour shows how they're represented on our world maps.
Smaller one is the "true" one the bigger is the common
Yes. "In this particular map, he marked the true objects in the darker color and put them against a regular map so you can see the difference."
Yeah, what She asked. It is not clear.
As said above, there cannot be any "true" representation of a sphere on a rectangle. The lighter parts represent the Mercator projection (probabaly the most common, distort the areas but preserve the correct shapes). The darker parts are local projections, which DO NOT preserve shapes and size, yeah, this article is a fraud. But the smaller the country, the more accurate they are, especially regarding to the global mercator projection. Their main issue is that they disconnect countries borders, adding spaces in between that DO NOT exist. Keep in mind that none of them is true, they both distort space in there own way. The only "true" map is a globe, all projections distort space. You can see a bunch of existing projections here : https://www.jasondavies.com/maps/transition/ (From a mapmaker who is starting to get pissed of reading such misleading articles)
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
Because you're undereducated, nothing to be braggin about
You sir, get this medal for being a jerk.
congratulations, you just won the asshole of the day award!
Neon_Sketch_Art like
candacejmchenry what