Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser
BoredPanda Add Post

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Job Recruiter Gives This Nurse An Opportunity To Negotiate, Turns Out They Just Want To Bait Her Into Taking Lower Pay
58points
65
People1 month ago

Job Recruiter Gives This Nurse An Opportunity To Negotiate, Turns Out They Just Want To Bait Her Into Taking Lower Pay

Negotiating your salary at a job interview feels kind of wrong because you feel like you need that job more than the employer needs you, so you don’t want to ask too much as it could make them not consider you as a candidate. Although many recruiters and HR specialists on social media keep encouraging job applicants to do that.

One nurse did just that. Actually, it was the recruiter who suggested negotiating as the candidate’s resume specified her preferred starting rate, which was too high for the company. The nurse responded that she was willing to discuss the matter, but got a response that they don’t negotiate on salary, which infuriated the woman, so she went on Reddit to vent.

More info: Reddit

Nurse looking for a job was willing to accept an offer lower than her initial minimum, but for the recruiter, negotiation meant accepting the fixed rate

Imge credits: Nenad Stojkovic (not the actual image)

The Reddit user Jbeez4117 is a licensed practical nurse (LPN) with 11 years of experience and also a new graduate registered nurse (RN). If you are not familiar with these terms, then LPNs work mainly with doctors and registered nurses, providing them assistance, and RNs work directly with patients.

The responsibilities reflect in the salaries as according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, RNs earn approximately $17,500 a year more than LPNs. With the additional education, Jbeez4117 has different wage expectations while looking for a new job.

Because the nurse had 11 years of experience, she believed she deserved to earn $34 per hour, but the clinic was offering $29/hr

Image credits: u/Jbeez4117

Image credits: u/Jbeez4117

Her expectation is to earn $34 per hour. Judging from the reaction in the comments, it isn’t too much to ask for. According to Becker’s ASC Review, the average national hourly wage for registered nurses is almost $39.

In the comments, the Redditor revealed that her location is central Florida, and there, the average is $33.42. Considering that the Original Poster (OP) has plenty of experience, she is not afraid to ask for a bit more.

When asked, the woman agreed to negotiate and find a middle ground where everyone was happy

A private fertility office in Florida replied to Jbeez4117’s job application but the recruiter had to mention that their starting rate was $29 per hour, which is $5 less than the OP’s requirement. The person asked if the nurse would negotiate.

The nurse responded positively and agreed to discuss the wage which would satisfy both parties, as she would love to work at that particular practice because it specialized in women’s health, which was her passion. What is more, she had 7 years of experience working in that field.

But the recruiter responded that $29 was the final offer, seemingly forgetting they were the ones that opened the negotiation

People in the comments believed the nurse was actually asking for too little and the clinic’s offer was even more ridiculous

The job recruiter probably forgot that they were the ones to suggest salary negotiation in the first place because after the nurse agreed to lower her expected pay, the recruiter stated that the starting rate was actually non-negotiable.

While responding to the comments, Jbeez4117 said that she didn’t even respond to the latest email. That is understandable, because it is quite disrespectful to ask for negotiation when one is actually asking the applicant to just accept the initial offer.

Redditors were also appalled at the recruiter’s audacity because they felt the clinic was trying to lure the nurse into a trap

A few people pointed out that it was a mistake for Jbeez4117 to mention that she wanted that job because she actually enjoyed working in women’s health. They suspected that this could have indicated to the recruiter that she would back down and accept a lower offer.

It could also be that the recruiter was put off by the woman mentioning another offer she was considering, because according to Investopedia, it is one of the salary negotiation mistakes. Although, Indeed claims that it actually shows your worth and may end in better salary offers, which was not the case this time.

In the end, the nurse didn’t respond to the email and hopefully found a better offer elsewhere

Do you think the nurse was asking for too much? Would you have continued to negotiate with this recruiter? Also, do you agree that this was a one-sided negotiation and the clinic wasn’t even planning on increasing their offer? Let us know your thoughts on the matter in the comments!

Share on Facebook
You May Like
Popular on Bored Panda
Share your thoughts
Whodathunkit
Community Member
1 month ago

Nurse here with 30 years of experience. I can't imagine earning this low of an hourly rate. That is ridiculous.

z
Community Member
1 month ago

story aside, this post is really hard to read

enohPilivE
Community Member
1 month ago

Recruiter should be fired if he/she does not have an explicit direction to negotiate for lower pay. A recruiter's job is to acquire talent, not squeeze on price. There are a million different ways to "cut costs" in an enterprise. Skimping on the talent that does the real work is a brain dead way and dehumanizing activity which turns your organization from an enterprise to a pyramid scheme kleptocracy. Yes, executives and managers should earn more - but it shouldn't be at the cost of squeezing your people that do the day to day. That's called being a total jerk.

Load More Comments
Whodathunkit
Community Member
1 month ago

Nurse here with 30 years of experience. I can't imagine earning this low of an hourly rate. That is ridiculous.

z
Community Member
1 month ago

story aside, this post is really hard to read

enohPilivE
Community Member
1 month ago

Recruiter should be fired if he/she does not have an explicit direction to negotiate for lower pay. A recruiter's job is to acquire talent, not squeeze on price. There are a million different ways to "cut costs" in an enterprise. Skimping on the talent that does the real work is a brain dead way and dehumanizing activity which turns your organization from an enterprise to a pyramid scheme kleptocracy. Yes, executives and managers should earn more - but it shouldn't be at the cost of squeezing your people that do the day to day. That's called being a total jerk.

Load More Comments
Popular on Bored Panda
Popular on Bored Panda
User Submissions
Also on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda