Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

BoredPanda Add post form topAdd Post
Tooltip close

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Family Wins Case Against Mistress Who Used Deceased Lover’s Sperm To Conceive
14

Court Dismisses Lawsuit Of Mistress Who Used Man’s Sperm To Conceive Without His Consent

ADVERTISEMENT

A court in China recently ruled against a woman who claimed she used her deceased lover’s frozen embryo to give birth to a baby boy and sought to have the child inherit his assets.

In April 2021, a married man, surnamed Wen, lost his life in a traffic accident in Qingyuan, located in China’s southeastern Guangdong Province. 

In December of that year, his extramarital lover, surnamed Ling, gave birth to a son, Xiaowen, after using an embryo that had been previously fertilized and frozen at a private clinic.

Highlights
  • A Chinese court ruled against a woman claiming inheritance rights for her son born from her deceased lover's frozen embryo.
  • The deceased, Wen, left no will regarding posthumous embryo use, complicating the child's claim to inheritance.
  • Ling, the mother, could not prove the embryo was fertilized by Wen or that she had permission to use his sperm.

Ling claims that the embryo used in the procedure had been created from sperm and eggs collected from Wen and herself before his death, as per ChinaDaily.

Image credits: Pexels/Nadezhda Moryak

In August 2023, Ling filed a lawsuit with the Qingcheng court, demanding that Wen’s wife share Wen’s life insurance, property, and company equity shares with Xiaowen.

The court dismissed Ling’s claim, establishing that Ling failed to prove that the frozen eggs were fertilized by Wen or provide conclusive evidence that the man had given her permission to use his sperm.

Additionally, Wen didn’t state anything in his will regarding posthumous embryo transplantation.

Wen’s wife was reportedly unaware that Ling had given birth to her son by embryo transfer surgery.

The court ruled against Ling, citing she could not provide conclusive evidence that her lover had fertilized the eggs or that the man had given her permission to use his sperm

ADVERTISEMENT

Image credits: Pexels/Amina Filkins

Embryo transfer, an assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedure often linked with in vitro fertilization (IVF), involves placing one or more fertilized eggs—referred to as embryos—into the uterus.

IVF can be done using a couple’s own eggs and sperm. Alternatively, it can involve eggs, sperm, or embryos from a known or unknown donor. In other cases, people may choose to have a gestational carrier — someone who has an embryo implanted in their uterus — deliver the baby.

Laws in China lack clarity regarding the inheritance rights of babies born from frozen embryos, as Zhao Nyuhuan, a lawyer with the Ronly&Tenwen Partners law firm, told Guangzhou Daily.

Additionally, the man, surnamed Wen, didn’t state anything in his will regarding posthumous embryo transplantation.

Image credits: Pexels/MART PRODUCTION

While the Civil Code enacted in 2021 recognizes the inheritance rights of fetuses, it does not explicitly mention frozen embryos. However, “given the potential for frozen embryos to develop into complete life forms, it is worth considering whether to grant them some degree of legal protection under certain conditions such as the right of inheritance,” the lawyer said.

Huang Dehao, from Zhonglun W&D Law Firm, explained that embryo transfer surgery at qualified private clinics is legal as long as the surgery is agreed upon by the owners of the frozen embryos.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senior partner Lin Zhaorun from Genius Law Firm believes that, due to the complexity and ethical considerations involved in this process, courts should assess each situation on a case-by-case basis.

Share on Facebook
Marina Urman

Marina Urman

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

Marina is a journalist at Bored Panda. Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, she holds a Bachelor of Social Science. In her spare time, you can find her baking sweet treats, reading, or binge-watching a docuseries on Netflix. Her main areas of interest are pop culture, literature, and education.

Read less »
Marina Urman

Marina Urman

Writer, BoredPanda staff

Marina is a journalist at Bored Panda. Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, she holds a Bachelor of Social Science. In her spare time, you can find her baking sweet treats, reading, or binge-watching a docuseries on Netflix. Her main areas of interest are pop culture, literature, and education.

Ugnė Lazauskaitė

Ugnė Lazauskaitė

Author, BoredPanda staff

Read more »

I am employed as a Visual Editor in the news team. I make sure you have the best pictures near the most interesting text. In general all day I am looking at all you favourite celebrities facies and I am geting payed for it!

Read less »

Ugnė Lazauskaitė

Ugnė Lazauskaitė

Author, BoredPanda staff

I am employed as a Visual Editor in the news team. I make sure you have the best pictures near the most interesting text. In general all day I am looking at all you favourite celebrities facies and I am geting payed for it!

What do you think ?
Add photo comments
POST
ceecu1985 avatar
CatWoman1014
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I agree with the courts. It’s almost as if she did it on the sole purpose of getting the inheritance. Consent is important. I think she should have had a discussion with his family beforehand before just resorting to that.

tabbygirl04152020 avatar
Tabitha
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We don't know if she maybe had a discussion with him that no-one else knows about, and he died before he could make what they discussed official. It's not like she snuck into the sperm bank in the middle of the night, stole vials of his sperm, and inseminated herself, ffs.

Load More Replies...
lmm-kuiper avatar
Sanne
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I agree with the other reasons why the court ruled against her, but "The court dismissed Ling’s claim, establishing that Ling failed to prove that the frozen eggs were fertilized by Wen" is just weird. It shouldn't be difficult to do a paternity test on the kid. There has to be living family of the man or a hair or something to test against.

carolineplotner_1 avatar
rorschach-penguin
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well, you can't prove that the relative is actually related to Wen either, can you? And I don't think the court has the right to seize the DNA of a living relative regardless.

Load More Replies...
rhodaguirreparras avatar
Pittsburgh rare
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I find it hard to believe that a married man went through the whole rounds to fertilise his mistress's eggs. The fact that he didn't write a will means that he wasn't really concerned about her future either. But anyway, a DNA test should clarify it, and IF he's his son, an independent party should establish and administer that money away from his mum's claws.

Load More Comments
ceecu1985 avatar
CatWoman1014
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I agree with the courts. It’s almost as if she did it on the sole purpose of getting the inheritance. Consent is important. I think she should have had a discussion with his family beforehand before just resorting to that.

tabbygirl04152020 avatar
Tabitha
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

We don't know if she maybe had a discussion with him that no-one else knows about, and he died before he could make what they discussed official. It's not like she snuck into the sperm bank in the middle of the night, stole vials of his sperm, and inseminated herself, ffs.

Load More Replies...
lmm-kuiper avatar
Sanne
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I agree with the other reasons why the court ruled against her, but "The court dismissed Ling’s claim, establishing that Ling failed to prove that the frozen eggs were fertilized by Wen" is just weird. It shouldn't be difficult to do a paternity test on the kid. There has to be living family of the man or a hair or something to test against.

carolineplotner_1 avatar
rorschach-penguin
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

Well, you can't prove that the relative is actually related to Wen either, can you? And I don't think the court has the right to seize the DNA of a living relative regardless.

Load More Replies...
rhodaguirreparras avatar
Pittsburgh rare
Community Member
2 weeks ago DotsCreated by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

I find it hard to believe that a married man went through the whole rounds to fertilise his mistress's eggs. The fact that he didn't write a will means that he wasn't really concerned about her future either. But anyway, a DNA test should clarify it, and IF he's his son, an independent party should establish and administer that money away from his mum's claws.

Load More Comments
You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
Related on Bored Panda
Trending on Bored Panda
Also on Bored Panda