Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

People Furious Over Judge’s Decision In The Laken Snelling Baby Case After New Evidence Surfaces
Young woman smiling in a gym wearing a cheerleader uniform related to Laken Snelling baby case controversy.

People Furious Over Judge’s Decision In The Laken Snelling Baby Case After New Evidence Surfaces

18

ADVERTISEMENT

A Kentucky judge has modified release conditions for Laken Snelling, a 21-year-old former University of Kentucky cheerleader accused of discarding her newborn in a closet

“Snelling must contact Pretrial Services within seven days to facilitate the commencement of electronic monitoring,” the order stated.

The update received polarizing reactions from netizens, many of whom argued that Snelling should be charged with m**der.

Highlights
  • Former University of Kentucky cheerleader Laken Snelling must now wear an electronic monitor while awaiting a grand jury’s decision about her shocking case.
  • A judge recently modified her release terms, ordering full house arrest at her father’s home.
  • Online reactions remain divided, with some calling the court’s decision too lenient, considering the gravity of her actions.
RELATED:

    A judge has mandated that Snelling be subjected to electronic monitoring as her case continues

    Young woman with long blonde hair and a neutral expression, related to the Laken Snelling baby case controversy.

    Image credits: Lexington Police Department

    According to court documents obtained by PEOPLE, Judge Melissa Moore Murphy ordered Snelling to begin wearing an electronic monitor within seven days and to remain under house arrest. 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The decision reverses an earlier arrangement that allowed her to split time between both parents’ residences. 

    Woman with long blonde hair in a red shirt looking down during the Laken Snelling baby case courtroom proceedings.

    Image credits: WBIR Channel 10

    The latest order requires her to wear an electronic monitor and remain on house arrest at her father’s home in Tennessee as she awaits a grand jury’s decision on whether she will be indicted. 

    The court has not publicly explained why the conditions of her house arrest were modified.

    Young woman with a large bow and face paint inside a gym, related to the Laken Snelling baby case controversy.

    Image credits: laken_snelling

    ADVERTISEMENT

    First Assistant County Attorney John Hyne, who submitted the proposed order, did not respond to requests for comment, the publication noted.

    Snelling’s case involves allegations that on August 27, she gave birth alone “to a baby which fell onto the floor of her bedroom,” according to search warrant affidavits cited by PEOPLE.

    Comment expressing outrage over judge’s decision in Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence emerges.

    Authorities have alleged that Snelling wrapped her baby in a towel and placed it in a trash bag along with her placenta. She then hid the baby in a closet and left her off-campus home to attend class.

    Her roommates later found blood in the room and alerted police, leading to Snelling’s arrest.

    Comment from Laurie Hill expressing anger over a judge’s decision in the Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    She was initially charged with a**se of a c**pse, tampering with physical evidence, and concealing the birth of an infant, but has pleaded not guilty to all counts.

    Previous reports have revealed that Snelling had been researching hidden pregnancies on the internet

    Young couple holding hands outdoors in a grassy field, related to Laken Snelling baby case public reaction.

    Image credits: laken_snelling

    Separate filings obtained by WKYT-TV have revealed that investigators found internet searches for “concealed or hidden pregnancy” on Snelling’s phone in the days leading up to the alleged incident. 

    The device also contained images related to pregnancies and Snelling while she was in labor. Some of the photos, however, had been deleted from her device.

    Young couple sitting in a grassy field, relating to the Laken Snelling baby case as new evidence sparks public fury.

    Image credits: laken_snelling

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Police noted that the deletions led them to believe “other items could have also been deleted in an attempt to hide any evidence of the pregnancy, birth and newborn baby.”

    According to a Us Weekly report, Snelling later “admitted to giving birth” and to “concealing the birth by cleaning any evidence, placing all cleaning items used inside of a black trash bag, including the infant, who was wrapped in a towel.”

    Comment from Tracee Michelle expressing outrage over privilege in the Laken Snelling baby case reaction.

    At the time of her arrest, Snelling was still enrolled at the University of Kentucky. She was also a member of the school’s STUNT cheerleading team.

    By early September, however, a spokesperson from the University of Kentucky confirmed that Snelling was no longer enrolled in the school. She was also no longer part of the STUNT team.

    Comment demanding charges for the father in the Laken Snelling baby case amid new evidence and judge’s decision controversy.

    Despite leaving the school, Snelling was joined by about ten fellow students during a court appearance on September 26 in an apparent show of support.

    Her classmates attended the proceedings, though they did not speak to the media, according to WLWT-5

    Young woman in a pink dress taking a mirror selfie, related to people furious over judge’s decision in baby case.

    Image credits: laken_snelling

    Snelling is currently out on a $100,000 bond as she waits for the grand jury’s decision

    Young woman wearing a bright yellow dress and hat smiling inside a room, related to the Laken Snelling baby case news.

    Image credits: laken_snelling

    Snelling remains out on a $100,000 surety bond as she awaits a grand jury’s decision on whether she will face formal indictment. 

    Her defense attorney has declined to comment on the ongoing proceedings, while legal experts have stated that the grand jury’s decision will determine whether her case will proceed to trial or if it will be dismissed. 

    Woman with long blonde hair in red dress standing beside man in suit during legal proceedings related to Laken Snelling baby case.

    Image credits: Law&Crime Network

    Until then, Snelling will remain confined to her father’s home under electronic monitoring. The restriction, however, has proven polarizing, with some critics arguing that it was far too lenient.

    “She should be charged with m**der. Why isn’t she in jail like most m**derers would be?” one commenter wrote. Another argued, “An alleged stillborn birth is not a c**me. Attempting to conceal said alleged stillbirth and going about your day, a c**me worth paying for.”

    Netizens shared their thoughts on Laken Snelling’s case on social media

    Comment by Jaz Shear questioning the judge’s decision in the Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence.

    Comment from Pamela Brock expressing anger over judge’s decision in the Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence surfaces.

    Comment expressing anger over judge’s decision in the Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence emerges.

    Comment from Pattie Erker expressing disbelief and anger over the judge’s decision in the Laken Snelling baby case.

    Comment on social media expressing anger over judge’s decision in Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence emerges.

    Alt text: Comment expressing anger over judge’s decision and new evidence in the Laken Snelling baby case.

    Screenshot of a social media comment showing anger over judge’s decision in the Laken Snelling baby case.

    Screenshot of a Facebook comment expressing opinion on the Laken Snelling baby case and recent judge's decision.

    Comment expressing frustration over judge’s decision in the Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence emerges

    Comment from Phyllis Benson Childress expressing shock and anger over judge’s decision in Laken Snelling baby case.

    Comment from Layla Jane expressing outrage over a judge’s decision in the Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence.

    Comment from Amy Flash expressing anger over judge’s decision in Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence surfaces.

    Alt text: Online comment showing outrage over judge's decision in Laken Snelling baby case after new evidence emerges

    Comment expressing anger over judge’s decision in baby case, with reaction icons visible below the text.

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Peter Michael de Jesus

    Peter Michael de Jesus

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    Read more »

    After almost a decade of reporting straight hard news, I now bring that discipline to entertainment writing at Bored Panda. I cover celebrity updates, viral trends, and cultural stories with speed and accuracy, while also embracing the lighter, evergreen side of pop culture. My articles are often syndicated to MSN, extending their reach to broader audiences. My goal is straightforward: to deliver trustworthy coverage that keeps readers informed about the stories dominating the conversation today.

    Read less »
    Peter Michael de Jesus

    Peter Michael de Jesus

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    After almost a decade of reporting straight hard news, I now bring that discipline to entertainment writing at Bored Panda. I cover celebrity updates, viral trends, and cultural stories with speed and accuracy, while also embracing the lighter, evergreen side of pop culture. My articles are often syndicated to MSN, extending their reach to broader audiences. My goal is straightforward: to deliver trustworthy coverage that keeps readers informed about the stories dominating the conversation today.

    What do you think ?
    mp7dvnrw85
    Community Member
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Kentucky banned abortion. This is a result of that.

    FreeTheUnicorn
    Community Member
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If the court doesn't think she's a flight risk, or a risk to the community, being on house arrest is pretty normal, if you can pay the bail. The only people who should be in jail before they are convicted are those who can be shown to be so dangerous, the risk to the public outweighs the infringement on civil liberties and due process. Jail before trial is meant to be for extreme cases. As guilty as it seems she is, she's entitled to a trial and shouldn't be punished until she's actually found guilty. It's a terrifying day in America when so many people are rooting against the presumption of innocence in the courts

    Petra Peitsch
    Community Member
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Imagine her being a homeless woman, with 0 chance to have any of normal and real defense. And in plus imagine her being in the same siruation, but not caucasian. Are you aware of the issues binging you up, or are you Murican? It's up to you ....

    Load More Replies...
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Dill
    Community Member
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't know American law but electronically tagging her and full house arrest at one property hasn't improved her current lot as far as I can tell. The decision reverses an earlier arrangement that allowed her to split time between both parents’ residences. Why be furious about this change? She's waiting to find out if she'll be charged with m****r (I'm not commenting on that aspect, I don't know enough about the case or the evidence there is) and if she is, it will go to trial. Changing her current conditions makes no difference to these aspects. They can't just lock her up without examining the evidence or without a fair trial. This is just one stage in a long process and hopefully she'll get the outcome she deserves.

    Roni Stone
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think the outrage and uproar are from the perceived double standard for pretty young white women and literally every one else in this nation. If a woman of color was in this situation, the general feeling is that she would definitely be in jail right now. I kind of agree with that feeling, too. She gets to be home with her family where someone else would be in a cell.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    mp7dvnrw85
    Community Member
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Kentucky banned abortion. This is a result of that.

    FreeTheUnicorn
    Community Member
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If the court doesn't think she's a flight risk, or a risk to the community, being on house arrest is pretty normal, if you can pay the bail. The only people who should be in jail before they are convicted are those who can be shown to be so dangerous, the risk to the public outweighs the infringement on civil liberties and due process. Jail before trial is meant to be for extreme cases. As guilty as it seems she is, she's entitled to a trial and shouldn't be punished until she's actually found guilty. It's a terrifying day in America when so many people are rooting against the presumption of innocence in the courts

    Petra Peitsch
    Community Member
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Imagine her being a homeless woman, with 0 chance to have any of normal and real defense. And in plus imagine her being in the same siruation, but not caucasian. Are you aware of the issues binging you up, or are you Murican? It's up to you ....

    Load More Replies...
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Dill
    Community Member
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't know American law but electronically tagging her and full house arrest at one property hasn't improved her current lot as far as I can tell. The decision reverses an earlier arrangement that allowed her to split time between both parents’ residences. Why be furious about this change? She's waiting to find out if she'll be charged with m****r (I'm not commenting on that aspect, I don't know enough about the case or the evidence there is) and if she is, it will go to trial. Changing her current conditions makes no difference to these aspects. They can't just lock her up without examining the evidence or without a fair trial. This is just one stage in a long process and hopefully she'll get the outcome she deserves.

    Roni Stone
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 month ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I think the outrage and uproar are from the perceived double standard for pretty young white women and literally every one else in this nation. If a woman of color was in this situation, the general feeling is that she would definitely be in jail right now. I kind of agree with that feeling, too. She gets to be home with her family where someone else would be in a cell.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT