Person Wonders Why Some Bigger Countries Look Small On Maps, People Explain It To Him Like He’s 10

Different formulas for cutting and stretching the 3D surface of the globe exist, each with its own advantages and drawbacks. These formulas are called projections, because they "project" a 3D surface onto a 2D surface.

The most common today is, without a doubt, the Mercator projection. It was invented in the 16th century by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator, and it was used heavily in shipping navigation. The main advantage of the Mercator projection is that you can follow straight lines on the map by following a constant direction on a compass.

With the proliferation of the internet, the Mercator projection made a very strong comeback. Its properties proved to fit the way interactive maps work really well, and so it was adopted by Google Maps and other similar services.

But as we see from Ken's image, the Mercator projection has some serious drawbacks, with the biggest one being that it introduces big deformations in the north and south.

Unfamiliar with the Mercator projection's characteristics, one might think Greenland is roughly the same size as the African continent. But that is far from the truth.

If you superimpose Greenland on Africa, it shrinks to roughly the size of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In reality, Africa can hold Greenland 14 times: Greenland has a surface area of 2.17 million square kilometres (836,000 square miles), while Africa covers 30.4 million square kilometres (11.7 million square miles), and the DRC is 2.35 million square kilometres (907,000 square miles).

You can play with this yourself on thetruesize.com, where you can "drag and drop" countries and continents on top of each other to see how they compare.

Interestingly, the African Union has even introduced a campaign to encourage governments and international organizations to stop using the Mercator map so that the continent is represented more accurately.

"It might seem to be just a map, but in reality, it is not," AU Commission deputy chairperson Selma Malika Haddadi told Reuters, saying the Mercator fostered a false impression that Africa was "marginal," despite being the world's second-largest continent by area, with over a billion people.

Criticism of the Mercator map is not new, but the 'Correct The Map' campaign, led by advocacy groups Africa No Filter and Speak Up Africa, has revived the debate, urging organizations to adopt the 2018 Equal Earth projection, which aims to reflect countries' true sizes.

"The current size of the map of Africa is wrong," Moky Makura, executive director of Africa No Filter, also told Reuters. "It's the world's longest misinformation and disinformation campaign, and it just simply has to stop."

Fara Ndiaye, co-founder of Speak Up Africa, said the Mercator projection affects Africans' identity and pride, especially for children who might encounter it early in school.

However, this initiative also has its critics. For example, historical researchers Thomas Suárez and Hamish Monk argue that the Mercator projection is not a product of European chauvinism, because all map projections are compromises designed for a particular purpose.

Again, the Mercator projection was a solution to a critical need — plotting a straight line that corresponds to a “straight” line on the Earth.

Plus, the Mercator map's ability to preserve the shape of land masses is the reason why it's still so commonly used in schools.

"With the dawn of satellites and GPS, the Mercator projection has fallen from favour because it is no longer needed to aid navigation," Monk explained. "Modern cartographers are free to blend equal-area maps, such as the Gall-Peters, with shape-preserving projections, such as the Mercator, and split [the] difference between size and shape."

"But there is no 'correct' map projection, and the idea that the Mercator projection is symptomatic of European imperialism is a modern critique. The fairest way to see the Earth is to study a globe."