122Kviews
“Complete This Image In A Way That Proves You Won’t Be Replaced By AI”: 30 People Finish A T-Rex Sketch In A Way AI Wouldn’t
A Twitter user named @anloremi started a thread on the platform in which he invited people to complete the T-rex image to prove that there is no way AI could replace human art. The results are unique and clever, with a human-like humorous twist to it.
This is the primary image on which users expressed their creativity.
"Complete this image in a way that proves you won’t be replaced by AI"
More info: Twitter
This post may include affiliate links.
Note: this post originally had 47 images. It’s been shortened to the top 30 images based on user votes.
Not to long ago I thought AI was rather harmless, but after seeing a handful of tumblr posts, I've come to the conclusion that before AI exists it needs its own rules and regulations, but we just skipped right over that bit and went straight to thief
AI is harmless. It’s just an alghorithm for data processing, nothing less, nothing more. The fact that it violates rules are only because some people decided that they will ignore them. There are enormous number of openly licensed images available, so we might get “legal” dataset for AI soon. It’s just it’s a trend now, it will take a time to straighten things up. Until then it really shouldn’t be used outside personal use (generating single use images for your DnD campaign? yes, please! Entering competition with AI generated image? Just hell no!)
Load More Replies...
For us BP regulars, we need one where the entire body is censored for no apparent reason.
I think the lesson here is that if a user is asked to complete a picture and they actually draw an accurate depiction of the intended image, they're probably a robot.
Not to long ago I thought AI was rather harmless, but after seeing a handful of tumblr posts, I've come to the conclusion that before AI exists it needs its own rules and regulations, but we just skipped right over that bit and went straight to thief
AI is harmless. It’s just an alghorithm for data processing, nothing less, nothing more. The fact that it violates rules are only because some people decided that they will ignore them. There are enormous number of openly licensed images available, so we might get “legal” dataset for AI soon. It’s just it’s a trend now, it will take a time to straighten things up. Until then it really shouldn’t be used outside personal use (generating single use images for your DnD campaign? yes, please! Entering competition with AI generated image? Just hell no!)
Load More Replies... For us BP regulars, we need one where the entire body is censored for no apparent reason.
I think the lesson here is that if a user is asked to complete a picture and they actually draw an accurate depiction of the intended image, they're probably a robot.
