We and our trusted partners use technology such as cookies on our site to personalize content and ads, provide social media features, and analyze our traffic. You can read more about it and change your preferences here.
It will take a great deal of effort to win back the trust of someone you have cheated on. In the process, you will deal with their constant doubts and questions about your every move, which you can’t really blame them for.
This was a reality between a couple where the husband had a history of infidelity. To make things worse, he got close to a female colleague and involved his spouse in the other woman’s family affairs.
The wife had been utterly confused, but her gut instincts had been sounding the alarm. She now turns to the Reddit community for some much-needed answers.
RELATED:
Regaining a spouse’s trust after infidelity requires effort
Woman looking suspicious and stressed while man stands behind her, relating to nannying his girlfriend’s children for free.
According to the woman, their therapist told her husband to no longer be friends with a woman, given how he’d been unfaithful in the past. However, navigating these waters can be quite challenging, according to some experts we spoke with.
Licensed psychotherapist Jessica Foley, LMHC, says it wouldn’t be fair because it promotes a “sense of untrust,” which may cause such rules to backfire in the long run.
Meanwhile, licensed psychotherapist and betrayal trauma expert Christina Kantzavelos, LCSW, pointed out that setting these rules depends on intent and context because setting boundaries is different from enforcing control. And if a spouse’s interactions continue to trigger their partner’s betrayal trauma, requesting limitations would be appropriate.
ADVERTISEMENT
Communication expert and University of Illinois Springfield director and professor, Dr. Beth Ribarsky, recognizes that friends from the opposite sex can be a source of tension. She adds that even if physical infidelity doesn’t happen, emotional cheating could be a considerable risk.
ADVERTISEMENT
If couples must go down this road, Voyager Recovery Center Medical Director Dr. Lori Bohn, PHMNP, says they should approach it from a place of empathy.
“Naturally, feelings may run wild, but putting complete bans on social contacts is likely to breed ill feelings and an undue imbalance in the relationship,” she said.
Betrayed spouses must recognize the signs of whether or not the marriage is worth staying in
It would’ve been a less complicated situation if the couple in the story hadn’t married. However, in their case, the woman must recognize the telltale signs to determine whether the relationship is still worth fighting for.
According to Kantzavelos, one indicator is if the unfaithful spouse refuses to take accountability for their actions and continues to engage in harmful behaviors that don’t repair the broken trust.
As for the betrayed partner, a clear sign to know that it is time to leave is if they feel chronically unsafe, resentful, and emotionally shut down despite genuine efforts.
ADVERTISEMENT
Dr. Bohn says another sign would be the inability to engage in discussions.
“The choice to walk away from a marriage is personal, but one’s emotional and mental health must be of the utmost importance,” she said.
Both Kantzavelos and Dr. Bohn have mentioned the option of professional help to deal with a partner’s infidelity. However, as the woman briefly mentioned in her story, she and her husband had already undergone therapy, seemingly to no avail.
Her next best move is to involve lawyers and initiate the divorce proceedings, given that her husband has shown no signs or intentions of wanting to regain her trust and make her feel secure again.
Commenters sided with her and advised her to rethink the marriage
Screenshot of a Reddit comment discussing suspicion of cheating and concerns about nannying coworker’s girlfriend’s children for free.
ADVERTISEMENT
Screenshot of a Reddit comment warning about a husband’s coworker and suspicions involving nannying girlfriend’s children for free.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment text displayed on a white background about nannying his girlfriend's children for free, posted by user AnnNonNeeMous.
Comment warning about cheating, advising self-love and leaving the unfaithful partner in a relationship situation.
Screenshot of a Reddit comment discussing suspicion about husband’s coworker and unpaid nannying of girlfriend’s children.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment expressing concern about nannying husband's coworker's children for free and its impact on kids' well-being.
Comment about choosing between children and coworker’s children, highlighting suspicion and free nannying concerns.
Screenshot of a forum comment warning about gaslighting and a suspicious relationship involving nannying his girlfriend’s children.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment discussing emotional manipulation and suspicion involving a husband’s coworker and nannying girlfriend’s children.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment text on a social media post about nannying his girlfriend’s children for free and suspicion about husband’s coworker.
Screenshot of an online comment expressing suspicion about nannying his girlfriend’s children for free and advice to investigate.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment discussing suspicion around nannying husband's coworker’s girlfriend’s children for free and childcare issues.
Text comment discussing suspicion about nannying husband's coworker’s children for free and raising concerns.
ADVERTISEMENT
Woman looking suspicious while caring for boyfriend's girlfriend's children, feeling doubtful about husband's coworker situation.
Comment discussing husband’s behavior and concerns about wife nannying his girlfriend’s children for free.
ADVERTISEMENT
Woman suspects husband’s coworker while nannying his girlfriend’s children for free, raising trust and respect issues.
Comment warning about nannying husband’s girlfriend’s children and suspicion of cheating coworker.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment discussing suspicion about nannying coworker’s children and concerns over emotional cheating and child safety.
ADVERTISEMENT
Screenshot of a Reddit comment questioning if the children are the husband’s other kids, related to nannying suspicion.
Comment discussing suspicion of cheating in a relationship involving husband’s coworker and emotional affair concerns.
Screenshot of a Reddit comment discussing suspicions about husband’s coworker and free nannying of girlfriend’s children.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment expressing concern about babysitting another woman’s kids for free, doubting husband's intentions and urging divorce.
Screenshot of an online comment revealing suspicion about a husband’s coworker and unpaid nannying of his girlfriend’s children.
Comment urging to stop free nannying and change locks, showing suspicion about husband’s coworker and girlfriend’s children.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment expressing suspicion about nannying husband's coworker's children for free, highlighting distrust and discomfort.
ADVERTISEMENT
Woman suspicious of husband’s coworker for nannying his girlfriend’s children for free and taking her feelings for granted.
Screenshot of a Reddit comment warning about nannying his girlfriend’s children for free and growing suspicion of husband’s coworker.
ADVERTISEMENT
Woman looking suspicious while using phone, reflecting concerns about nannying and husband’s coworker situation.
People in the comments had varying reactions about the new developments
Comment discussing boundaries and suspicions about nannying coworker’s children and husband’s behavior concerns.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment discussing suspicion and frustration about nannying husband's coworker's children for free and possible infidelity.
ADVERTISEMENT
Comment text reading DARVO 101 in response to a woman suspicious of husband’s coworker nannying his girlfriend’s children for free.
Screenshot of an online comment discussing suspicion about nannying his girlfriend’s children for free.
Screenshot of a comment explaining gaslighting in the context of suspicion about nannying a coworker’s girlfriend’s children.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Screenshot of an online comment discussing concerns about nannying his girlfriend’s children for free and relationship trust issues.
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
I'm a visual editor at Bored Panda. I kickstart my day with a mug of coffee bigger than my head, ready to tackle Photoshop. I navigate through the digital jungle with finesse, fueled by bamboo breaks and caffeine kicks. When the workday winds down, you might catch me devouring bamboo snacks while binging on the latest TV show, gaming or I could be out in nature, soaking up the tranquility and communing with my inner panda.
I'm a visual editor at Bored Panda. I kickstart my day with a mug of coffee bigger than my head, ready to tackle Photoshop. I navigate through the digital jungle with finesse, fueled by bamboo breaks and caffeine kicks. When the workday winds down, you might catch me devouring bamboo snacks while binging on the latest TV show, gaming or I could be out in nature, soaking up the tranquility and communing with my inner panda.
Married men can have friends, be they women or men. The issue here is that Cheaters cannot be Married men. This therapist sux IMO... Actively damaging his patient by feeding her a delusion that the marriage can "recover". How the F are you supposed to recover something that does not exist anymore?
I was just about to type that the therapist is an idiot. Real men can refrain from trying to bang their female friends. If the female friend wanted to, then not a friend.
Thank you. That's the bit I found suspect. My partner and I have friends of both genders. And they're just that, friends. Neither of us want to jump our friends.
If the therapist was talking to a same-s*x couple, would they give the same advice? Doubt it.
"Our therapist told him that... married men shouldn't have female friends." Yeah, this therapist is an idiot. Perhaps her husband specifically can't handle having female friends because of his issues, most married men have no issue having female friends.
“Cheaters cannot be Married men”: That leaves just married women to be cheaters. I don’t understand your logic here, Ben, unless you edited your post and forgot to change one or more words because obviously married men CAN be cheaters. We read about ‘em here most days (but I’m aware you know that already).
Ahahah I think you are stuck on one semantic interpretation of the words. I will try my best to explain what i actually mean.
"
Cheaters can't be married men or women or people or whatever. As in married, people by definition are faithful to their partners. Once one cheats = no longer faithful = no longer qualified to be titled as "married"
There, i deconstructed it the best i could!
"
AHhah this part I find hilarious, "“Cheaters cannot be Married men”: That leaves just married women to be cheaters." Yes, only them for as was written in the second X chromosome! Those are the rules!
I am being sarcastic obviously cus that conclusion from the misunderstanding is so unhinged that it loops back to being hilarious XD
Married is a legal status, a literal contract signed by both parties. Cheating doesn’t automatically invalidate the contract, they are still married. Separation, doesn’t automatically invalidate the contract, they are *still* married. What it does is often initiate the legal process of dissolving the contract, otherwise known as divorce. Only once that process is complete are they no longer married. What’s unhinged is you insisting there’s “semantic interpretation” of this legal fact. That’s *not* how it works.
You need to consider the fact that there are ppl who value other things more than they do "legal status". Cheaters are not married to me like they are in the eyes of most folk.
Here is an extreme example of what I mean.
Would you care the SLIGHTEST BIT about the "legality" of a child bride/groom forced marriage. Would the paper work help you see it as a "marriage"?
Yeh i think about those things and that is why "legal status" in general means nothing to me.
Believe it or not, I’m fully in support of your statement that parents shouldn’t have the right to agree to a minor getting married. For me, this goes beyond parental rights to decide what is best for their child. Marriage should only ever happen between two people who are old enough to decide for themselves. You chose a straw man argument to prove your point when neither of the parties involved were minors. Whether we like or agree with it or not, marriage is a legal status. I’m glad that many countries are willing to discount the legality of a contract entered into by parents of a minor. The paperwork counts but it can be and is walked back once the legal system confirms that at least one of the participants wasn’t old enough to agree.
Married men can have friends, be they women or men. The issue here is that Cheaters cannot be Married men. This therapist sux IMO... Actively damaging his patient by feeding her a delusion that the marriage can "recover". How the F are you supposed to recover something that does not exist anymore?
I was just about to type that the therapist is an idiot. Real men can refrain from trying to bang their female friends. If the female friend wanted to, then not a friend.
Thank you. That's the bit I found suspect. My partner and I have friends of both genders. And they're just that, friends. Neither of us want to jump our friends.
If the therapist was talking to a same-s*x couple, would they give the same advice? Doubt it.
"Our therapist told him that... married men shouldn't have female friends." Yeah, this therapist is an idiot. Perhaps her husband specifically can't handle having female friends because of his issues, most married men have no issue having female friends.
“Cheaters cannot be Married men”: That leaves just married women to be cheaters. I don’t understand your logic here, Ben, unless you edited your post and forgot to change one or more words because obviously married men CAN be cheaters. We read about ‘em here most days (but I’m aware you know that already).
Ahahah I think you are stuck on one semantic interpretation of the words. I will try my best to explain what i actually mean.
"
Cheaters can't be married men or women or people or whatever. As in married, people by definition are faithful to their partners. Once one cheats = no longer faithful = no longer qualified to be titled as "married"
There, i deconstructed it the best i could!
"
AHhah this part I find hilarious, "“Cheaters cannot be Married men”: That leaves just married women to be cheaters." Yes, only them for as was written in the second X chromosome! Those are the rules!
I am being sarcastic obviously cus that conclusion from the misunderstanding is so unhinged that it loops back to being hilarious XD
Married is a legal status, a literal contract signed by both parties. Cheating doesn’t automatically invalidate the contract, they are still married. Separation, doesn’t automatically invalidate the contract, they are *still* married. What it does is often initiate the legal process of dissolving the contract, otherwise known as divorce. Only once that process is complete are they no longer married. What’s unhinged is you insisting there’s “semantic interpretation” of this legal fact. That’s *not* how it works.
You need to consider the fact that there are ppl who value other things more than they do "legal status". Cheaters are not married to me like they are in the eyes of most folk.
Here is an extreme example of what I mean.
Would you care the SLIGHTEST BIT about the "legality" of a child bride/groom forced marriage. Would the paper work help you see it as a "marriage"?
Yeh i think about those things and that is why "legal status" in general means nothing to me.
Believe it or not, I’m fully in support of your statement that parents shouldn’t have the right to agree to a minor getting married. For me, this goes beyond parental rights to decide what is best for their child. Marriage should only ever happen between two people who are old enough to decide for themselves. You chose a straw man argument to prove your point when neither of the parties involved were minors. Whether we like or agree with it or not, marriage is a legal status. I’m glad that many countries are willing to discount the legality of a contract entered into by parents of a minor. The paperwork counts but it can be and is walked back once the legal system confirms that at least one of the participants wasn’t old enough to agree.
26
35